Professional Documents
Culture Documents
December 2012
Nuris Ismail, Reid Paquin
Asset Management:
Building the Business Case for the Executive
With the uncertainty surrounding the economic recovery, manufacturing
executives are compelled to make difficult decisions related to capital and
operational budgets that remain very tight. It is good news then that
Aberdeen's December 2011 Enterprise Asset Management in 2012: A Data
Driven Predictive Approach to Maintenance report uncovered that having the
ability to increase return on assets and optimize utilizations can translate
into significant savings. Aberdeen surveyed 140 manufacturing executives to
determine the Best-in-Class business and technology capabilities that were
being adopted to address these issues.
December 2012
Analyst Insight
Aberdeens Insights provide the
analyst's perspective on the
research as drawn from an
aggregated view of research
surveys, interviews, and
data analysis
This Analyst Insight will uncover how top performing companies are able to
manage the reliability of their asset base to execute an asset management
strategy, which results in higher operational and financial performance. All of
this will build the business case for manufacturers to gain support from
executives to win budget and resources to implement an effective asset
management program.
Business Context
Unplanned downtime, inability to maintain planned production rates, safety
and environmental incidences are all problems that can be traced directly to
recurring equipment failure and operation mismatches in production rates
and capacities. Asset management is the methodical planning and control of
an asset throughout its lifecycle, including design and construction,
operation, maintenance, upgrades, and eventual disposal or decommission.
The challenges for managing asset lifecycle differ for each asset. For a
company commissioning a new piece of equipment, the challenge may be
bringing the asset online quickly after acceptance. For complex asset-based
manufacturing it may be related to tool and process qualification. For a
running facility it is maximizing asset effectiveness, availability, and reliability,
while for other enterprises it may be related to asset decommissioning.
These are compounded by the ongoing challenges of a retiring workforce,
an aging infrastructure, employee safety, and regulatory compliance, among
others.
only in terms of how it has improved plant operations, but also how
successful these programs have been for achieving financial goals.
Respondents were divided into three categories based on their aggregate
performance in these four metrics: the top 20% of performers (Best-inClass), the middle 50% (Industry Average), and the bottom 30% of
performers (Laggards). Table 1 displays the aggregated performance of Bestin-Class, Industry Average, and Laggard organizations.
Table 1: Top Performers Earn Best-in-Class Status
Definition of
Maturity Class
Best-in-Class:
Top 20%
of aggregate
performance scorers
Industry Average:
Middle 50%
of aggregate
performance scorers
Laggard:
Bottom 30%
of aggregate
performance scorers
Best-in-Class Strategies
The top strategy adopted by the Best-in-Class is to utilize analytical tools to
plan out capital expenditures. This allows these leaders to predict their
maintenance and safety, reduce the overall risk in their operations, and even
forecast the eventual need for replacement of an existing asset and plan the
budget for its replacement (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Strategic Actions
Improve long term capital
planning with better
analytical tools
25%
16%
17%
Outsource maintenance
activities to third party
7%
13%
4%
0%
Best-inClass
All Others
10%
20%
Percentage of Respondents, n = 140
30%
The Best-in-Class companies first collect all of their asset information from
different plants and store it in a centralized knowledge warehouse. In doing
so, they remove this information from individual data sources (such as excel
spreadsheets and access databases located on personal computers) and have
a single repository for data collection. In addition, the Best-in-Class also
provide historical and real-time asset data for intelligent decision making.
By having robust data like this at hand, manufacturers can see how a
particular asset has historically performed and compare that to how it is
running in real-time. This is crucial in determining whether an asset is
running at its peak or if maintenance is needed. In addition, by using trending
data, companies are able to predict adverse events. Best-in-Class companies
provide this information on-demand, thus enabling easier information
access, which reduces unscheduled downtime and improves asset
performance. All of these capabilities are needed for manufacturers to
move from a reactive, break-fix methodology to a predictive maintenance
strategy.
Industry
Average
Laggards
56%
44%
23%
55%
35%
22%
42%
33%
31%
Sustainability Capability
Investing in technologies to gather asset and energy data has enabled the
Best-in-Class to benchmark asset performance and determine the cost of
maintaining versus replacing the asset for a newer, more energy efficient
version. For example, if there is a compressor that uses more energy than
expected, with the help of the available data, the plant manager can schedule
maintenance to understand the spike in energy consumption and establish
corrective action to optimize productivity and reduce energy utilization.
Through these capabilities, the Best-in-Class see a decrease in total energy
consumption of 9% as compared to Laggards who experienced a 3%
increase year over year.
Technology Enablers
Technology adoption is an important step for implementing an asset
management strategy. The Best-in-Class are more invested in software
solutions to automate business process as well as knowledge- and
performance-management capabilities. The Best-in-Class are also more
likely than their competitors to invest in an Enterprise Asset Management
(EAM) solution. An EAM system provides a single platform for connecting
workers, assets, processes, knowledge, and decision-making capabilities
based on collected information.
EAM solutions provide a core set of functionality to manage work orders,
materials, spare parts, employee data, procurement, and maintenance
schedules on a single platform. In short, EAM provides a holistic view of a
company's asset base, empowering managers to control and improve the
quality, safety, and efficiency of their operations.
However, adoption of EAM is just the first step. To realize Best-in-Class
performance, companies also need to integrate their EAM solution with
their other technology investments (Figure 5). One of the roadblocks to
this process is manufacturer adoption of technology applications that
function independently.
Figure 5: Interoperability with EAM System
Implementation and
internalizing Predictive
Maintenance Technologies plus
providing a means of
communicating results of
analysis to all parties are
designed to anticipate and
mitigate failures, thus reducing
risk of loss of function and noncompliance with environmental
regulations. Cost avoidance and
avoidance of failures became
obvious right from the start of
this initiative. RCM analysis is
being done on the most critical
assets. However,
implementation of results is
encountering roadblocks at the
deck plate level."
Source: Aberdeen Group, November 2012
~Maintenance Consultant
Industrial Equipment
Manufacturer
At the highest level, the Best-in-Class are more likely than their competitors
to adopt Master Data Management (MDM) solutions, otherwise known as
"Big Data." Big Data has been a reality in the manufacturing world for quite
some time, considering the wealth of information collected from the
manufacturing facility on a daily basis.
In asset management, data is collected from multiple sources, such as the
actual controller, sub-meters, data historians, and paper-based system.
MDM is used by the Best-in-Class to eliminate duplicate data points, scrub
out incorrect data, and standardize the information (such as supplier,
equipment, audit data, etc.) into an authoritative master data source. This
ensures the collected data is accurate and reliable, which is vital for proper
decision-making.
Once the data is stored in a single repository, the Best-in-Class are able to
put context around the information by utilizing asset dashboards, workflows
and analytics to be more predictive in their maintenance and asset
strategies. These modules automate data collection, analyze and monitor
data, and automatically escalate adverse events to appropriate decision
makers at the right time, in the right format, to prevent or reduce the
impact of equipment failure.
Key Takeaways
With the tightening of budgets, managers are being asked to do more with
less. Because of this, it is not easy to procure funding to start or improve
upon an asset management program. However, the operational and financial
gains that stem from a proper management system well outweigh the
investment needed. By implementing a program centered on reliability and
predictive maintenance, companies will be able to gain visibility, improve
efficiency, and ultimately save money.
Related Research
Operational Risk Management: Getting
Ahead of the Risk Curve; November
2012
Enterprise Asset Management 2012: A
Data Driven Predictive Approach to
Maintenance; December 2011