Professional Documents
Culture Documents
306
(1)
Where F is the Faraday, Ap the protonmotive force in
mV, AE the membrane potential in mV and ApH the
pH gradient across the inner membrane [l - 31.
D. G. Nicholls
307
V
N
~- 1
Pl
(7)
n
where V is the volume of filtrate, N the total counts
of the isotope in the aliquot before filtration and n
the counts of the isotope retained on the membrane
filter. If these spaces are r, c and h for rubidium,
methylammonium and acetate, respectively, and the
matrix volume, determined as the sucrose-impermeable space, is m,then the the degree of concentration
Mitochondria1 Proton-ElectrochemicalGradient
308
(]I:
0.1
4'
0
1 .o
0.5
1.5
l3 PH
which closely approximated to those for the determination of A p . The incubation medium contained
250 mM sucrose, 10 mM choline chloride, 10 mM
glycyl glycine, 0.5 pM valinomycin, 0.46 mM KCI,
0.1 mM sodium-ADP, 1 pCi/ml [3H]ADP, 1 mg/ml
albumin, 0.93 mM sodium phosphate and 1 mM
sodium-EDTA. Further additions are detailed in the
text. Mitochondria, 1.3 mg/ml, were added to the
incubation, and 3 min allowed for equilibration of
the added [3H]ADPwith the matrix adenine nucleotide
pool. 5 mM sodium 3-hydroxybutyrate was then
added, and a further 4min allowed for equilibrium
to be attained. The incubation was filtered through
a 0.6 pm cellulose nitrate membrane filter, and the
filtrate was quenched in PCA. Neutralised extracts
were separated on polyethylimine cellulose thin-layer
plates, eluting with 1 M LiCI. Spots were eluted with
10 mM HCL, 1 M NaCl, and counted for tritium.
h-v
m
C - h
m
C - h
The dependency of
upon ApH calculated from
Eqn (9) is plotted in Fig. 1. Once ApH is known, the
exact value of u can be determined from Eqns (5), (6)
and (8), to enable the degree of concentration of
rubidium to be determined.
D. G. Nicholls
309
Calculation for
counts/min
[jH]Acetate
['4C]Methylammonium
86Rb+
268 133
71 306
11200
Membrane filters
A
counts/min
-
11638
3 844
61 1
13501
2912
1712
Apparent 'spaces'
on membrane filters
18.15
22.79
23.08
h ([3H]acetate)
c (['4C]methylammonium)
r ("Rb')
21.21
17.03
72.17
Concentration in matrix
[Eqn @)I
A
[Aclii [Aclo
[CH,NH21 i/[CHSNHz lo
[Rbl i/[Rblo
- 59 ApH (from Fig. I)
AE [from Eqn (2)]
Ap [from Eqn (I)]
B
26. I
29.0
30.1
- 86
+ 88
+ 2
344.4
+ 83
+ 150
+ 233
Mitochondria1 Proton-ElectrochemicalGradient
310
250
250
200
;
150
E
100
50
0
250
t
200
150
04
0
3 1oc
6
[Phosphate] ( m M )
10
5c
Fig. 4. Ap as a function of the initial external phosphate concentration for rat liver mitochondria oxidising 3-hydroxybutyrate. Conditions were as for Table 1 B, with the further
4
6
[KCII (mM)
10
Fig. 3. Ap as a function of the initial external potassium concentration for rat liver mitochondria oxidising 3-hydroxybutyrate. Conditions were as for Table 1 B, except that the
initial external potassium concentration was varied. (A) Assuming a constant matrix volume of 0.4 pl/mg; (B) assuming
osmotic equilibrium with potassium contributing 50 % of the
matrix osmolarity. (A) Ap, (0)AE, (0) - 59 ApH
D. G . Nicholls
31 1
Table 2. The relation between the extra-mitochondrial phosphate potential and protonmotive force j o r rat liver mitochondria
oxidising 3-hydroxybuzyrare
The experiment was performed as described in Methods. Further additions to the incubation medium are detailed below. The
extra-mitochondria1ATP/ADP ratio was determined 4 min after the initiation of respirationby the addition of 3-hydroxybutyrate.
Phosphate potential was varied by the addition of varying concentrations of potassium or phosphate to the medium. The
phosphate potential was calculated on the assumption of a stoichiometry of two protons translocated per ATP synthesised,
employing a value of - 7.9 kcal/mol for the standard free energy of hydrolysis of ATP [9]. Values for Ap were obtained from the
experiments depicted in Fig. 3 and 4
Kf
Pi
ADP
ATP/ADP
FM
mM
__
0.46
0.91
1.91
2.91
4.91
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
ATP
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
1.43
2.43
3.43
5.43
7.93
82
79
47
17
5
84
87
87
88
89
7
16
48
77
88
6
6
5
5
5
11.4
5.1
1.0
0.22
0.055
13.1
17.8
17.2
16.9
19.2
[ATPI
[ADP] [Pi]
Phosphate
potential
M-'
mV
13 400
5 990
1100
240
59
9 700
7 600
5 100
3 200
2 400
292
282
261
241
223
288
285
280
274
27 1
Ap
230
214
1 94
186
175
210
204
200
191
184
312
250
100
200
50
>
-E
->
150
-E
4
1oc
-5c
-1oc
5c
C
10
20
30
40
[KCII (mM)
50
60
70
4
Time ( m i n )
J.
m
150
-> 100
E
50
c
-5c
-100
4
6
Time (rnin)
10
D. G. Nicholls
250
313
10
20
30
Proton current (nequiv. rnin-
+
40
*
50
rng-1)
CONCLUSION
By the chemiosmotic theory, state 4 respiration is
limited by the proton permeability-of the inner membrane [1,2], a proton circuit being established
composed of a generator (the respiratory chain) and
a resistance (the inner membrane). The apparent
conductance of the inner membrane in terms of
proton re-entry has been estimated in state 4 from
the ratio of the proton current (calculated from the
respiratory rate multiplied by the H + / O ratio), to the
protonmotive force. Mitchell and Moyle obtained a
value of O.ll/nequiv. Hf x min- x mg protein-
x mV- in this way [15]. If the inner membrane
behaves as an ohmic conductor of protons, then there
will be a strict proportionality between the proton
current and Ap. The relationship between proton
current and Ap was investigated in the experiment
depicted in Fig. 8. Mitochondria were incubated with
succinate, the activity of succinate dehydrogenase
being controlled by titration with malonate. The rate
of oxygen uptake was recorded and an aliquot was
filtered to determine Ap. The curve relating proton
current to Ap consists of two regions. Up to 180 mV
the inner membrane behaves as an ohmic conductor
of protons, however at higher potentials an increase
of proton conductance becomes apparent, the proton
current increasing faster than Ap. Thus the figure of
230 mV obtained for Ap in state 4 may well be limited
Eur. J. Biochem. 50 (1974)
The results presented in this communication confirm the value for the protonmotive force obtained
by Mitchell and Moyle [3] for mitochondria during
controlled respiration and extend their observations
by continuously monitoring Ap during state 3 respiration (Fig. 6), and during ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 7). The
absence of a protonmotive force in the absence of
respiration and in the presence of uncoupler, which was
assumed on thermodynamic grounds by Mitchell and
Moyle [3], is here confirmed experimentally (Table 1
and Fig. 5).
Such discrepancies as occur between this communication and the original determination of protonmotive force [3], are limited to conditions where the
latter technique is operating at the limits of sensitivity,
namely in the absence of respiration, and in the
presence of high potassium concentrations.
Thus in the presence of rotenone and FCCP, the
components of the zero protonmotive force measured
by isotope distribution are considerably greater than
the
33 mV and - 33 mV previously reported. A
membrane potential of +33mV corresponds to a
potassium gradient in the presence of valinomycin of
only 3.6-fold [Eqn (2)], which in the absence of added
potassium in the incubation medium, would imply
virtually complete depletion of matrix potassium in
the presence of valinomycin and uncoupler. It may
314
Mitochondria1Proton-Electrochemical Gradient
tential of the mitochondrion is not evidence per se
that this gradient is the intermediate in ATP production [1,2], failure to observed a gradient with
these characteristics is sufficient to invalidate a chemiosmotic concept of energy transduction.
However, the maintenance of a level of ADP
phosphorylation which requires a free energy in excess
of that which can be donated by the proton electrochemical gradient (Table 2) under comparable conditions is, as has been amply discussed [4- 12,161,
a major obstacle to acceptance of the chemiosmotic
theory in its present form. Unless determinations of
protonmotive force ([3,13,14], this communication)
are substantial underestimates, it is clear that either
a stoichiometry of two protons translocated per ATP
synthesised [29] is not valid under the approach to
equilibrium state 4 conditions, or that the mechanism
of energy transduction is other than chemiosmotic.
This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish
National Science Foundation (2171-025). The author is
grateful to Mrs Agneta Bergstrom for expert technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
1. Mitchell, P. (1966) in Chemiosmotic Coupling in Oxidative
and Photosynthetic Phosphorylation, Glynn Research,
Bodmin, Cornwall.
2. Mitchell, P. (1968) in Chemiosmotic Coupling and Energy
Transduction, Glynn Research, Bodmin, Cornwall.
3. Mitchell, P. & Moyle, J. (1969) Eur. J . Biochem. 7 , 471
-484.
4. Klingenberg, M. (1961) Biochem. Z . 335,243-262.
5 . Cockrell, R. S., Harris, E. J. & Pressman, B. C. (1966)
Biochemistry, 5 , 2326- 2335.
6. Slater, E. C. (1969) in The Energy Level and Metabolic
Control in Mitochondria (Papa, S . , Tager, J. M.,
Quagliarello, E. & Slater, E. C. eds) pp. 255-259,
Adriatica, Bari.
7. Klingenberg, M. (1969) in The Energy Level and Metabolic Control in Mitochondria (Papa, S . , Tager, J. M.,
Quagliarello, E. & Slater, E. C., eds) pp. 189- 193,
Adriatica, Bari.
8. Wilson, D. F. & Erecinska, M. (1972) Biomemhranes:
Molecular Arrangements and Transport Mechanisms
(van Deenan, L. L. M., Riemersma, J. C. & Tager, J.
M., eds) pp. 119- 132, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
9. Rosing, J. & Slater, E. C. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
267,215- 290,
10. Wilson, D. F., Dutton, P. L. &Wagner, M. (1973) Curr.
Top. Bioenerget. 5,233-265.
11 Wilson, D. F. & Owen, C. (1973) Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 53,326- 333.
12 Wilson, D. F., Stubbs, M., Veech, R. L., Erecinska, M.
& Krebs, H. A. (1974) Biochem. J . 140, 57-64.
13 Rottenberg, H. (1970) Eur. J . Biochem. 15, 22-28.
14 Padan, E. & Rottenberg, H. (1973) Eur. J. Biochem. 40,
431 - 437.
15. Mitchell, P. & Moyle, J. (1967) Biochem. J . 104, 588
- 600.
315
D. G. Nicholls
16. Azzone, G. F. & Massari, S. (1971) Eur. J . Biochem.
19,97 - 107.
17. Mitchell, P. & Moyle, J. (1969) Eur. J . Biochem. 9, 149
- 155.
18. Addanki, S., Cahill, F. D. & Sotos, J. F. (1967) Science
(Wash. D . C . ) 155, 1678- 1679.
19. Addanki, S., Cahill, F. D. & Sotos, J. F. (1968) J . Biol.
Chem. 243,2337-2348.
20. Hoek, J. B. Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam
(1972).
21. Nicholls, D. G. & Lindberg, 0. (1972) FEBS Lett. 25,
61 64.
22. Rossi, E. & Azzone, G. F. (1968) Eur. J . Biochem. 7 ,
418-426.
23. Van Dam, K. & Tsou, C. S. (1969) in The Energy Level
~