Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227521860
CITATIONS
READS
30
1,437
5 authors, including:
Amir Ghandi
Seyed M A Razavi
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
596
Original article
The rheological properties of ketchup as a function of different
hydrocolloids and temperature
Arash Koocheki,1 Amir Ghandi,2 Seyed M. A. Razavi,1 Seyed Ali Mortazavi1 & Todor Vasiljevic3,*
1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
2 Institute of Food and Crop Science, School of Science and Engineering, University of Ballarat, PO Box 663, Ballarat, Vic. 3353, Australia
3 School of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
(Received 13 April 2008; Accepted in revised form 30 September 2008)
Summary
The ow properties of ketchup were assessed upon addition of commonly used food thickeners: guar,
xanthan and CMC gum at three dierent concentrations (0.5%, 0.75% and 1%) and four temperatures (25,
35, 45 and 55 C). The ketchup without supplementation served as a control. All ketchup formulations
exhibited non-Newtonian, pseudoplastic behaviour at all temperatures and hydrocolloid levels. The Powerlaw and Herschel-Buckley model were successfully applied to t the shear stress versus shear rate data. The
ow behaviour indices, n and n, varied in the range of 0.1890.228 and 0.2160.263, respectively.
The consistency coecients, k and k, were in the range of 8.4227.22 and 6.5620.10 Pa sn, respectively. The
addition of hydrocolloids increased the yield point (s0) and apparent viscosity of the ketchup in comparison
to that of the control. The Arrhenius equation was successfully used to describe the eects of temperature on
the apparent viscosity of the prepared formulations. The Ea value appeared in the range between 5492.6 and
21475.8 J mol)1.
Keywords
Introduction
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01868.x
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Materials
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
ups
Ingredients formulation
Formulation
5000
500
60
175
25
15
1.5
1.25
1.5
1
597
598
s s0 k0 c_ n
where s is the shear stress (Pa); (_c) is the shear rate (s)1);
k and k are the consistency coefcients (Pa sn); n and n
are the ow behaviour index (dimensionless); and s0 is
the yield point (Pa s). The temperature dependency was
evaluated by tting the Arrhenius-type model to experimental data using the consistency index as an indication
of the viscous nature of food (Sengul et al., 2005):
k k0 eEa =RT
Flow behaviour
Table 2 Adjusted mean squares from analysis of variance of rheological properties of ketchups
Source of variation
DF
s0 (Pa)
P-value
k (Pa sn)
P-value
k (Pa sn)
P-value
Hydrocolloid (H)
Concentration (C)
Temperature (T)
HC
HT
CT
HCT
Error
2
3
3
6
6
9
18
48
39.228
155.299
37.37
6.542
1.816
2.032
1.087
0.395
<
<
<
<
39.538
198.621
141.489
4.938
2.130
10.111
0.746
0.197
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
108.428
351.86
281.115
12.6
5.487
21.48
0.809
0.145
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.001
< 0.0001
0.003
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
k and k (consistency coefficient, Pa sn) and s0 (yield point, Pa) were obtained by fitting the power law and HerschelBulkley models, respectively, to the
data.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Table 3 Eect of hydrocolloid concentration and temperature on yield point (so), consistency coecient (k, k) and ow behaviour index (n, n)
from the power law and HerschelBulkley model of formulated ketchupsa
Power law model
Hydrocolloid/
concentration (%)
HerschelBulkley
Temperature (C)
k (Pa sn)
R2
k (Pa sn)
r2
25
35
45
55
19.34
11.38
9.53
8.42
0.228
0.225
0.219
0.213
0.999
0.995
0.998
0.999
4.41
2.18
2.39
2.57
16.18
9.89
7.82
6.56
0.250
0.244
0.244
0.244
0.991
0.992
0.992
0.993
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
23.82
22.04
19.85
17.84
24.64
23.18
21.43
18.96
26.73
25.62
23.31
20.97
0.218
0.214
0.212
0.208
0.211
0.209
0.205
0.199
0.204
0.203
0.198
0.199
0.998
0.998
0.999
0.997
0.999
0.999
0.998
0.998
0.999
0.999
0.996
0.998
9.37
7.79
6.42
6.11
10.04
9.98
7.12
7.45
11.87
11.39
8.93
7.68
16.70
16.22
14.83
13.23
17.33
16.41
16.06
13.36
18.38
17.19
16.68
15.24
0.257
0.249
0.242
0.243
0.255
0.255
0.238
0.239
0.250
0.252
0.244
0.238
0.991
0.992
0.992
0.990
0.991
0.992
0.993
0.993
0.992
0.992
0.992
0.991
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
22.54
17.04
15.99
14.26
23.87
18.88
16.44
15.77
24.63
19.72
17.68
16.98
0.215
0.208
0.206
0.204
0.231
0.227
0.219
0.218
0.206
0.198
0.194
0.189
0.998
0.995
0.997
0.998
0.999
0.999
0.997
0.999
0.999
0.998
0.999
0.997
9.05
5.88
6.01
3.78
7.39
4.67
5.04
5.00
9.33
7.56
4.11
5.38
16.00
12.71
11.73
11.45
18.54
15.46
12.53
11.86
17.84
14.11
14.31
12.60
0.256
0.243
0.244
0.229
0.263
0.251
0.249
0.248
0.256
0.238
0.216
0.219
0.991
0.992
0.992
0.992
0.993
0.991
0.990
0.991
0.992
0.992
0.992
0.993
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
24.42
23.16
20.87
18.64
25.98
24.58
23.12
20.44
27.22
26.10
24.28
22.13
0.27
0.221
0.219
0.208
0.201
0.216
0.212
0.208
0.199
0.218
0.215
0.204
0.196
0.01
0.998
0.995
0.997
0.998
0.999
0.999
0.997
0.999
0.999
0.998
0.999
0.997
8.59
8.62
6.42
6.90
9.92
9.45
8.36
7.58
9.87
10.34
9.42
8.12
0.44
18.24
17.03
16.16
13.43
18.81
17.17
16.98
14.81
20.10
18.31
17.12
16.11
0.32
0.258
0.258
0.240
0.240
0.255
0.255
0.246
0.237
0.255
0.256
0.244
0.235
0.003
0.992
0.991
0.993
0.993
0.993
0.993
0.992
0.993
0.992
0.992
0.991
0.991
so (Pa)
Control
Xanthan gum
0.5
0.75
1.0
Guar gum
0.5
0.75
1.0
CMC
0.5
0.75
1.0
SEM
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
599
600
(a)
(b)
(c)
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
k0 (Pa sn)
Ea (KJ mol)1)
R2
Control
Xanthan gum
0.5
0.75
1
Guar gum
0.5
0.75
1
CMC
0.5
0.75
1
0.0025
21.47
0.94
1.00
1.49
1.86
7.72
6.85
6.51
0.99
0.96
0.95
0.186
0.24
0.41
11.52
11.09
9.84
0.94
0.95
0.93
(a)
3.50
3.00
Ln k (Pa sn)
2.50
2.00
Control
1.50
3.00
3.10
0.5%
3.20
0.75%
3.30
1%
3.40
1000/T (1 K1)
1.26
2.07
2.87
7.25
6.18
5.49
0.99
0.98
0.97
(b)
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Ln k (Pa sn)
3.00
2.50
2.00
Control
1.50
3.00
3.10
0.5%
3.20
0.75%
3.30
1%
3.40
1000/T (1 K1)
(c)
3.50
3.00
Ln k (Pa sn)
3.50
2.50
2.00
Control
1.50
3.00
3.10
0.5%
3.20
0.75%
3.30
1%
3.40
1000/T (1 K1)
Figure 2 Consistency index as a function of temperature of ketchup
samples stabilised by addition of (a) xanthan, (b) guar, or (c) CMC at
dierent concentrations (0.5%, 0.75% and 1%).
The results of this study indicated that ketchup supplemented with studied hydrocolloids (xanthan, guar,
CMC) behave as non-Newtonian, shear thinning uid
in temperature range of 2555 C. The power law model
601
602
was more reliable estimation of the rheological behaviour of the ketchups than the HerschelBulkley model.
Increasing the gum concentration increased the apparent viscosity in comparison to the control; however, the
eect of guar gum on viscosity was greater than those of
xanthan and CMC gums. The consistency indices
increased with the concentration of all three hydrocolloids showing that addition of these gums stabilises the
consistency of the ketchup. The activation energy in
general is found to decrease using gum substitute as
compared with the control sample. Ketchup containing
1% CMC had the lowest temperature dependency
meaning that had the highest stabilising eect on
ketchup.
References
Alexander, R.J. (1999). Hydrocolloid gums. Part II: Synthetic products. Cereal Foods World, 44, 722725.
Barbosa Canovas, G.V. & Peleg, M. (1983). Flow parameters of
selected commercial semi-liquid food products. Journal of Texture
Studies, 14, 213234.
Bayoda, E., Willers, E.P. & Tornberg, E. (2008). Rheological and
structural characterization of tomato paste and its inuence on the
quality of ketchup. LTW, 41, 12891300.
Bhattacharya, S., Bhat, K.K. & Raghuver, K.G. (1992). Rheology of
Bengal gram cicer arietinum our suspensions. Journal of Food
Engineering, 17, 8396.
Bottiglieri, P., De Sio, F., Fasanaro, G., Mojoli, G., Impembo, M. &
Castaldo, D. (1991). Rheological characterization of ketchup.
Journal of Food Quality, 14, 497512.
Casas, J.A., Santosa, V.E. & Garcia-Ochoa, A. (2000). Xanthan gum
production under several operational conditions: molecular structure and rheological properties. Enzyme and Microbial Technology,
26, 282291.
Chhinnan, M.S., McWaters, K.H. & Rao, V.N.M. (1985). Rheological
characterization of grain legume pastes and eect of hydration time
and water level on apparent viscosity. Journal of Food Science, 50,
11671171.
Crandall, P.G. & Nelson, P.E. (1975). Eects of preparation and
milling on consistency of tomato juice and puree. Journal of Food
Science, 40, 710713.
Dervisoglu, M. & Kokini, J.L. (1986). Steady shear rheology and uid
mechanics of four semi-solid foods. Journal of Food Science, 51,
541625.
Dickinson, E. (2003). Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the inuence on
the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocolloids, 17, 2539.
Dziezak, J.D. (1991). A focus on gums. Food Technology, 45, 116132.
Ford, L.D., Borwankar, R., Martin, R.W. Jr & Holcomb, D.N. (1997).
Dressings and sauces. In: Food Emulsions (edited by S.E. Friberg &
K. Larsson). Pp. 361412. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Garti, N. & Reichman, D. (1993). Hydrocolloids as food emulsiers
and stabilizers. Food Structure, 12, 411426.
Garti, N., Madar, Z., Aserin, A. & Sternheim, B. (1997). Fenugreek
galactomannans as food emulsiers. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und
Technologie, 30, 305311.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Institute of Food Science and Technology