Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Increased mental
health problems:
high stress, long
hour work, influx of
technology,
economic
uncertainty,
political unrest and
natural disasters
etc.
Objective -- Hypotheses
An Experimental Design
Study involved pre/posttests
with comparison groups to
test the effectiveness of Life
Coaching program among a
group of Thai persons of
working age.
improving
participants goal
enhancing levels
of Self-efficacy,
Hope and Life
Satisfaction
H: There are significant correlational relationships among goal striving, selfefficacy, and hope in promoting life satisfaction (subjective well-being)
among working persons within the Thai environment through evidencebased life coaching intervention.
Methodology
Participants
Instruments
Data Analysis
Working persons
Talent group of one
Public Co.
Randomly assigned twogroups-- using 5-session
LCP Program
repeated measures to
Methodology
Methodology
Emergenetics Assessment
Methodology
Screening Process
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI
53)
===================
Exclusion criterion: 2 SD
above T-score (>70)
47 participants took the test
T-score ranged 38.12
87.52 (mean=50)
3 participants
with T-score
>70 (6.4%)
2 included in the
coaching program
( 1st and 2nd)
Coaching
LCP: 5 Sessions
SS
Concept
Contents
Time
Objective, Coaching
protocol, Randomly
divided Coaching &
Control groups
8 hrs
60
mins
Understand self
thinking & behaviors,
Smart goal setup
60
mins
4th follow up
60
mins
60
mins
Morningcoaching
group
Afternooncontrol
group
8 hrs
Coaching
1.Objective
2. Pre-assessment &
Consent
3. Randomly assigned
2 groups
4. LCP Program
5. Coaching Timetable
Coaching
Coaching
Closing Session
Morning Session
Coaching Group only
SharingCOP
Afternoon Session
Combined
Presentation
Workshop-transfer skill
Post Assessment
Control group
Result
Result
Experimental Group
Control Group
Pretest M (SD)
Posttest M (SD)
Pretest M (SD)
Posttest M (SD)
Goal Striving
1.50 (.69)
4.00 (.92)
1.00 (.01)
2.10 (.64)
Self-efficacy
3.15 (.28)
3.49 (.32)
3.04 (.35)
3.19 (.27)
Hope
5.23 (.43)
5.73 (.52)
5.26 (.44)
5.63 (.56)
Life
Satisfaction
4.83 (.71)
5.41 (.62)
4.53 (.81)
4.90 (1.02)
Goal Striving
The Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Self-efficacy
The Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Hope
The Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Group-interaction = not-sig
(p>.05)
Life Coaching = M-diff 0.50
(5.73-5.23)
Control = M-diff 0.37 (5.63-5.26)
Life Satisfaction
The Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Group-interaction = not-sig
(p>.05)
Life Coaching = M-diff 0.58
(5.41-4.83)
Control = M-diff 0.37 (4.90-4.53)
Discussion
In line with researches: Green et al., 2006, 2007 and Spence & Grant, 2007.
Sample size effect of both
coaching & control group.
Only Goal Striving = Sig
Self-efficacy, Hope
and Life-satisfaction
=
not significant
(20 vs 25 GSI)
Contamination effect of
Coaching Group
Way Forward
future research
Other specific group of
population: Coaching for
executives, sales or medical
professionals.
Online wellness or career
coaching
Additional Qualitative
nature to gain more
insight of coaching
experience
Preventive Scheme
of Health Care: using
Positive Psychology
as preventive
measure to enhance
resilience against
Depression, Stress,
Anxiety
Way Forward
Conclusion
Life coaching using
cognitive behavioral
and solution-focused
model:
Effective in promoting
well-being
Participants Reflection
(P # 1)
Useful tool which enable me to
think systematically, understand
self and actualize personal goal.
(P # 5)
Discover the goal in life
and the know how to
materialize it with the
SMART goal practice.
(P # 3)
Learn how to set clear
life goal. Could yield
more benefit if
company would provide
more sessions and
follow up.
(P # 6)
To realize personal goal
clearly and serve as a
reflecting mirror to help
transform oneself. Enable the
use of coaching tools to help
others.
Q&A
Thank you.