Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE HISTORY
Introduction: Conservative, non-antibiotic and non-surgical management of acute diverticulitis is currently being investigated. To better inform clinical decisions, better understanding of disease mechanisms, disease burden and severity is needed.
Methods: Literature search of risk factors, pathophysiology, epidemiology and disease burden/severity
reported over the last decade.
Results: Acute diverticulitis is a common disease and has a high disease burden. Incidence of hospital
admissions is reported around 71 per 100,000 population, with reported increase in several subpopulations over the last decades. The incidence is likely to increase further with the aging populations. Risk
factors for left-sided acute diverticulitis include dietary, anthropometric and lifestyle factors. Disease
mechanisms are still poorly understood, but a distinction between inflammation and infection is
emerging. The integrative and complex role of the gut microbiota has become an interesting factor for
both understanding the disease as well as a potential target for intervention using probiotics. Mild,
self-limiting events are increasingly reported from studies of successful non-antibiotic management in
a considerable number of cases. Risk markers of progression to or presence of severe, complicated disease are needed for better disease stratification. Current risk stratification by clinical, imaging or endoscopic means is imperfect and needs validation. Long-term results from minimal-invasive and
comparative surgical trials may better help inform clinicians and patients.
Conclusions: Over- and under-treatment as well as over- and under-diagnosis of severity is likely to
continue in clinical practice due to lack of reliable, robust and universal severity and classification systems. Better understanding of pathophysiology is needed.
Introduction
Acute colonic diverticulitis is a common disease condition in
the Western world. Understanding of the mechanisms and
risk factors leading to development of diverticulae and subsequent inflammation has been poorly understood in the
past and, consequently, management strategies may have
suffered from inadequate appreciation of underlying pathogenesis leading to over- and under-treatment using
both antibiotics, preventive measures, as well as surgical
approaches.[13] This is reflected in a number of deviations
in coexisting expert recommendations, or societal and
national guidelines issued in the past.[49] However, emerging evidence has challenged past understanding of acute
diverticulitis, which has led to a number of challenges of previous management strategies, including less use of antibiotics
for uncomplicated disease, the role of preventive measures
and debate over surgical approaches for complicated
cases.[3,1012] Still, management appears to vary considerably between regions.[1316] In order to arrive at more uni-
ksoreide@mac.com
KEYWORDS
Methods
A literature search of the English literature over the past decade (January 2006June 2016) for studies related to epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and surveillance.
Key search words used included epidemiology, risk factors,
pathomechanism, pathogenesis, severity, classification
coupled with Booolean word AND for Acute diverticulitis.
Papers from the past 5 years were prioritized, as were studies
of higher evidence level (i.e., randomized trials). Systematic
reviews, meta-analysis and updated guidelines were
searched, where available.
K. SREIDE ET AL.
Results
Pathogenesis of disease
The prevalence of diverticulosis of the colon increases with
age and is found in approximately 10% of those aged
50 years rising to 50% in those over 80 years. Change in the
extracellular matrix and altered collagen structure with age
partly explains this pattern. Diverticulae typically occur in the
colonic wall where the capillary mesenteric arteries perforate
the tissue, thus rendering a potential weakness in the wall
(Figure 1).
Diverticulae occur more frequently in the sigmoid as
opposed to the right colon, indicating a relation to both
intraluminal pressure and intraluminal content. No clear genetic defect has been identified in those with diverticulitis.
The estimated liability due to genetic factors was reported at
between 40% and 50% in two Scandinavian studies of siblings.[17,18] The reported risk was greater in twins with the
greatest risk in monozygotic twins.
Low-grade inflammation as propagated in patients with
obesity may also play a role in the pathogenesis of acute
diverticulitis.[19] More recently the integrative and complex
Figure 1. Illustration of the multifactorial influence on diverticulitis development and risk of progression during a life-time perspective.
Risk factors
Risk factors for left-sided acute diverticulitis include dietary,
anthropometric and lifestyle factors. Consumption of a vegetarian diet was associated with a 31% (relative risk [RR]: 0.69,
95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.550.86) lower risk of admission to hospital or death from diverticular disease compared
to meat eaters in a large cohort study.[41] Increasing dietary
fiber intake has been shown in two large cohort studies to
be associated with a decreased risk of developing symptomatic diverticular disease (Table 1).[42,43]
Patients with known diverticular disease were previously
advised not to consume nuts, popcorn and corn. However a
recent report from the American Health Care Professionals
Follow Study found no relationship between consumption of
corn, nuts or popcorn with the development of
diverticulitis.[44]
A near 3-fold increase in RR of acute diverticulitis was
reported following a diagnosis of alcoholism in a Danish
Exposure
Comparison
Adjusted
RR (95% CI)
Diet
Crowe et al. [42]
Aldoori et al. [43]
690,075
43,881
0.86 (0.840.88)
0.63 (0.440.91)
Smoking
Hjern et al. [47]
Aldoori et al. [46]
Nonsmokers
Nonsmokers
35,809
47,678
1.32 (1.111.57)
1.25 (0.752.09)
BMI
Hjern et al. [49]
Strate et al. [48]
36,592
47,228
1.33 (1.031.72)
1.78 (1.082.94)
Physical activity
Hjern et al. [49]
Strate et al. [50]
<30 min/day
>57.4 MET-h/week
>30 min/day
<8.2 MET-h/week
31,456
47,228
1.53 (1.281.82)
0.75 (0.580.95)
K. SREIDE ET AL.
cohort of female and male alcoholic patients (RR: 2.9, 95% CI:
2.14.0 and RR: 2.0 95% CI: 1.52.6).[45] In moderate drinkers
this relationship appears to be weaker with a 1.4-fold
increase in risk in those drinking >30 g of alcohol per day
compared to nondrinkers (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.941.97).[46]
Current and past smoking was associated with a moderate
increase in the risk of developing symptomatic diverticular
disease compared to nonsmokers (Table 1).[46,47]
An increased risk of acute diverticulitis has been reported
in obese men (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2, RR: 1.78,
95% CI: 1.082.94 compared to BMI <21 kg/m2).[48] A similarly increased risk of diverticular disease and complicated
disease has been reported amongst obese women (BMI
>30 kg/m2, RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.031.72 compared to BMI
2024.99 kg/m2).[49] Two large cohort studies have reported
that increased physical activity is associated with a reduced
risk of acute diverticulitis (Table 1).[49,50]
A recent casecontrol study from Sweden found no evidence that that statins affected the development of symptomatic diverticular disease in general (adjusted OR: 1.00,
95% CI: 0.941.06).[51] However, in the same study, current
statin use was associated with a reduced risk of emergency
surgery for diverticular disease (adjusted OR: 0.70, 95% CI:
0.550.89).
Classification of disease
Historically, the stages of diverticulitis have been classified
using the Hinchey classification,[52] for which Classes III
and IV would require immediate surgery with resection of
the diseased bowel and a stoma (Hartmanns procedure).[53,54] This approach has been challenged as imaging
studies have revealed that even patients with generalized
peritonitis and free air may recover by less invasive measures, such as intravenous antibiotics, percutaneous drainage
and potentially laparoscopic lavage with appropriately
placed drains.[1] There are currently no imaging studies,
biomarkers or clinical risk scores that perfectly predict
which patients will benefit from any given treatment,
although several risk factors and proposed systems
exist.[55,56] Proposed classification systems include an
endoscopy-based score,[57,58] image-based approaches
including ultrasound [59,60] and computed tomography,[6163] as well as a combined clinicalradiological
physiology-based assessment.[64] A recent opinion-based,
consensus severity-grading system has been proposed for
emergency general surgery conditions including acute
diverticulitis, but currently lacks validation.[65] The variation
and approach to the disease assessments in the different
settings likely reflects the variable predominant populations
at risk seen by the different specialties; thus, endoscopists
and internists may be more prone to see patients with
less severe disease, and consequently rely on endoscopic
and ultrasonography findings, whereas surgeons typical see
patients with an acute abdomen and have potentially
more critically ill population to evaluate, and thus prefer
CT and vital signs-based scores.[55] Clearly, further studies
into the best classification system are needed.
Prevention of recurrence
Conservative treatment has become the primary choice in
the prevention of a recurrent episode of diverticulitis. A highfiber diet is still recommended in several guidelines despite
the fact that high-quality evidence for effectiveness of a
high-fiber diet in the treatment of diverticular disease is
lacking.
Lifestyle factors seem to have an impact on the course of
diverticular disease. Several prospective cohort studies and a
number of retrospective studies have found positive associations between obesity and diverticular complications.[48,49]
Smoking also increases the likelihood of complications in
diverticulitis.[66,67] Lifestyle counseling may need to be
given more emphasis in the (preventive) management of
diverticular disease and its complications. However, prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of lifestyle changes, once
diverticular disease has emerged, is required.
In the last few years, new medical therapies such as
probiotics (mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria) and
5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA; Mesalazine) have been studied.
Probiotics may seem a promising therapy for symptomatic
diverticular disease or for prevention of recurrent diverticulitis, but data are limited.[68]
Appraisal of a systematic review from 2010 shows only
two of the six included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating 5-ASA (Mesalazine) treatment enrolled patients with
diverticulitis and these studies were poor quality.[69] The
other four RCTs enrolled patients with diverticular disease. A
more recent systematic review demonstrated lack of good
evidence to support medical therapy with either 5-ASA or
probiotics, for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.[68]
Furthermore, after these reviews another four RCTs have
been performed, three negative trials and one positive
trial.[7073] Two North-American trials (PREVENT1 and
PREVENT 2) [70] have indicated no effect on reducing recurrence rates of recurrent attacks with mesalazine compared to
placebo. One study has found a statistically significant protective effect of mesalazine use with or without probiotics,
but the relapse rate in the placebo group was almost double
(46% vs. <30% for the other trials) and the subgroups are
hampered by small numbers.[73] Routine use of medical
therapy for relapse prevention after diverticulitis cannot be
recommended based on the available evidence.[74]
Conclusion
Acute colonic diverticulitis is a common disease, with a high
disease burden in modern society. Over- and under-treatment and over- and under-diagnosis of severity is likely due
to lack of reliable, robust and universal severity and classification systems. The incidence is likely to increase with the
growing and aging populations. While the disease mechanisms are still poorly understood, a clear distinction between
inflammation and infection has become more evident with
the successful non-antibiotic management in a considerable
number of cases. Further understanding of inflammatory factors and infectious components is needed. Risk markers of
disease progression or with ability to detect or predict
severe, complicated disease are needed for better disease
stratification. Long-term results from minimal-invasive and
comparative surgical trials may better help inform clinicians
and patients.
Disclosure statement
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
SSAT. SSAT patient care guidelines: surgical treatment of diverticulitis; 2007[cited 2014 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.ssat.
com/cgi-bin/divert.cgi.
Andersen JC, Bundgaard L, Elbrond H, et al. Danish national
guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease. Dan Med J.
2012;59:C4453.
Fujita T. Feasibility of the practice guidelines for colonic diverticulitis. Surgery. 2012;151:491492.
Kruis W, Germer CT, Leifeld L. Diverticular disease: guidelines of
the German society for gastroenterology, digestive and metabolic
diseases and the German society for general and visceral surgery.
Digestion. 2014;90:190207.
Vennix S, Morton DG, Hahnloser D, et al. Systematic review of evidence and consensus on diverticulitis: an analysis of national and
international guidelines. Colorectal Dis. 2014;11:866878.
Eglinton TW, Frizelle FA. Trials of surgical treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis: finding what they look for. Ann Intern Med.
2016;164:195196.
Costi R, Zarzavadjian le Bian A, Smadja C, et al. Operative or nonoperative management of Hinchey III purulent acute diverticulitis?
Can J Surg. 2016;59:E2E3.
Centor RM. Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: what to do until
we have better data. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:120121.
Khan DZ, Kelly ME, OReilly J, et al. A national evaluation of the
management practices of acute diverticulitis. Surgeon. 2016;
doi:10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.004.
Wright GP, Flermoen SL, Robinett DM, et al. Surgeon specialization impacts the management but not outcomes of acute complicated diverticulitis. Am J Surg. 2015; 211:10351040.
OLeary DP, Lynch N, Clancy C, et al. International, expert-based,
consensus statement regarding the management of acute
diverticulitis. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:899904.
Jaung R, Robertson J, Rowbotham D, et al. Current management
of acute diverticulitis: a survey of Australasian surgeons. New
Zealand Med J. 2016;129:2329.
Granlund J, Svensson T, Olen O, et al. The genetic influence on
diverticular disease a twin study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2012;35:11031107.
Strate LL, Erichsen R, Baron JA, et al. Heritability and familial
aggregation of diverticular disease: a population-based study
of twins and siblings. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:736742.e1.
quiz e14.
Comstock SS, Lewis MM, Pathak DR, et al. Cross-sectional analysis
of obesity and serum analytes in males identifies sRAGE as a
novel biomarker inversely associated with diverticulosis. PLoS
One. 2014;9:e95232.
Daniels L, Philipszoon LE, Boermeester MA. A hypothesis: important role for gut microbiota in the etiopathogenesis of diverticular
disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:539543.
Lahner E, Bellisario C, Hassan C, et al. Probiotics in the treatment
of diverticular disease. A systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver
Dis. 2016;25:7986.
Daniels L, Budding AE, de Korte N, et al. Fecal microbiome analysis as a diagnostic test for diverticulitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol
Infect Dis. 2014;33:19271936.
Spiller RC. Changing views on diverticular disease: impact of
aging, obesity, diet, and microbiota. Neurogastroenterol Motil.
2015;27:305312.
Ferguson LR, Laing B, Marlow G, et al. The role of vitamin D in
reducing gastrointestinal disease risk and assessment of individual
dietary intake needs: focus on genetic and genomic technologies.
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60:119133.
Chabok A, Pahlman L, Hjern F, et al. Randomized clinical trial of
antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg.
2012;99:532539.
de Korte N, Unlu C, Boermeester MA, et al. Use of antibiotics in
uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2011;98:761767.
Moya P, Arroyo A, Perez-Legaz J, et al. Applicability, safety and
efficiency of outpatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:301307.
K. SREIDE ET AL.
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
[71]
[72]
Skoldberg F, Svensson T, Olen O, et al. A population-based casecontrol study on statin exposure and risk of acute diverticular disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:203210.
Virgilio E, Balducci GE. John Hinchey (1934 to present): father of
modern age of acute complicated diverticulitis of the colon.
World J Surg. 2016; [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s00268016-3546-6.
Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated
diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg. 1978;12:85109.
Wasvary H, Turfah F, Kadro O, et al. Same hospitalization
resection for acute diverticulitis. Am Surg. 1999;65:632635. discussion 6.
Tan JP, Barazanchi AW, Singh PP, et al. Predictors of acute diverticulitis severity: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2016;26:4352.
Pfutzer RH, Kruis W. Management of diverticular disease. Nat Rev
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:629638.
Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Di Mario F, et al. Predictive value of the
Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA)
endoscopic classification on the outcome of diverticular disease
of the colon: an international study. UEG J. 2016;4:604613.
Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Di Mario F, et al. Development and validation of an endoscopic classification of diverticular disease of the
colon: the DICA classification. Dig Dis. 2015;33:6876.
Lembcke B. Ultrasonography in acute diverticulitis credit where
credit is due. Z Gastroenterol. 2016;54:4757.
Lembcke BJ, Strobel D, Dirks K, et al. Statement of the section
internal medicine of the DEGUM ultrasound obtains pole position for clinical imaging in acute diverticulitis. Ultraschall Med.
2015;36:191195.
Thorisson A, Smedh K, Torkzad MR, et al. CT imaging for prediction of complications and recurrence in acute uncomplicated
diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;31:451457.
Sartelli M, Moore FA, Ansaloni L, et al. A proposal for a CT driven
classification of left colon acute diverticulitis. World J Emerg Surg.
2015;10:3.
Flor N, Maconi G, Sardanelli F, et al. Prognostic value of the diverticular disease severity score based on CT colonography: followup in patients recovering from acute diverticulitis. Acad Radiol.
2015;22:15031509.
Sallinen VJ, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. Staging of acute diverticulitis based on clinical, radiologic, and physiologic parameters.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:543551.
Tominaga GT, Staudenmayer KL, Shafi S, et al. The American
Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grading Scale for 16 emergency general surgery conditions: disease-specific criteria characterizing anatomic severity grading. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
2016; [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000001127.
Papagrigoriadis S, Macey L, Bourantas N, et al. Smoking may be
associated with complications in diverticular disease. Br J Surg.
1999;86:923926.
Turunen P, Wikstrom H, Carpelan-Holmstrom M, et al. Smoking
increases the incidence of complicated diverticular disease of the
sigmoid colon. Scand J Surg. 2010;99:1417.
Unlu C, Daniels L, Vrouenraets BC, et al. Systematic review of
medical therapy to prevent recurrent diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal
Dis. 2012;27:11311136.
Gatta L, Vakil N, Vaira D, et al. Efficacy of 5-ASA in the treatment
of colonic diverticular disease. J Clin Gastroenterol.
2010;44:113119.
Raskin JB, Kamm MA, Jamal MM, et al. Mesalamine did not prevent recurrent diverticulitis in phase 3 controlled trials.
Gastroenterology. 2014;147:793802.
Stollman N, Magowan S, Shanahan F, et al. A randomized controlled study of mesalamine after acute diverticulitis: results of
the DIVA trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:621629.
Parente F, Bargiggia S, Prada A, et al. Intermittent treatment with
mesalazine in the prevention of diverticulitis recurrence: a randomized multicentre pilot double-blind placebo-controlled study of
24-month duration. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:14231431.
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
Makela JT, Klintrup K, Rautio T. The role of low CRP values in the
prediction of the development of acute diverticulitis. Int J
Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:2327.
Hogan J, Sehgal R, Murphy D, et al. Do inflammatory indices play
a role in distinguishing between uncomplicated and complicated
diverticulitis? Digest Surg. 2016;34:711.
Schultz JK, Yaqub S, Wallon C, et al. Laparoscopic lavage vs primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis: the SCANDIV
randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:13641375.
Thornell A, Angenete E, Bisgaard T, et al. Laparoscopic lavage
for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:137145.
Vennix S, Musters GD, Mulder IM, et al. Laparoscopic peritoneal
lavage or sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with
purulent peritonitis: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised,
open-label trial. Lancet. 2015;386:12691277.