Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The small intestine is the primary digestion and absorption site of dietary nutrients. The digestive enzymes
and electrolytes in the intestinal fluid that are secreted
by the pancreas, intestinal glands, and mucosal cells are
responsible for the hydrolysis of dietary macronutrients
and play vital roles in regulating products for transport.
Several studies have shown that protease activities in
the intestinal fluid are changed proportionately in response to the amounts of protein in the diet, whereas
the amylase and lipase activities are dependent on their
respective substrate carbohydrate and lipid contents
(Corring, 1980; Valette et al., 1992; Yago et al., 1997;
Zhao et al., 2007). Snook and Meyer (1964) reported
that when rats received whole-egg protein, trypsin and
chymotrypsin activities increased within intestinal con2012 Poultry Science Association Inc.
Received December 7, 2011.
Accepted March 16, 2012.
1 Corresponding author: zsummit@163.com
tents when compared with a casein diet, which indicated that the types of ingested protein sources could
affect digestive enzyme secretion. As a component of
intestinal fluid, electrolytes in the intestinal tract are
required for proper digestive enzyme functionality and
the absorption of dietary hydrolysates (Clemens and
Maloiy, 1978; Knarreborg et al., 2003). Sullivan et al.
(1974) reported that magnesium and calcium could
bind protein and were correlated with the amylase and
protease activities in the pancreatic juice of pigs, which
meant dietary composition could affect the ion concentration of intestinal fluid. In the practical feed formulation for Chinese yellow chickens, corn is the main
source of cereal grain, whereas the proteinaceous ingredient varies greatly. To reduce the feed costs, soybean
meal is usually substituted with relative low-quality
protein feed, such as cottonseed meal, peanut meal, or
rapeseed meal. However, the antinutritional ingredients
and imbalanced digestible amino acids in the diet may
have related influences on the activities of intestinal
digestive enzymes and the concentration of ion in intestinal fluid. Few data were reported on the relationship
1641
ABSTRACT An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary protein source on the digestive enzymes and electrolyte composition of digesta fluid in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of chickens. A
2 3 factorial and completely randomized design that
used 2 types of diets that differed only in their protein
source [a corn-soybean meal-miscellaneous meal diet
(CSMD) and a corn-miscellaneous meal diet (CMD)]
and 3 types of cannulated roosters (duodenal, jejunal,
and ileal cannulations) was adopted. The experiments
included 5 replicates for each of the 6 treatments, and
each replicate involved 3 cannulated chickens. The digesta samples were collected for 1 h every 4 h between
09:30 and 18:30 h on d 31, 33, and 35 of the experiment. The amylase, lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin
activities and the electrolyte composition in the duodenal, jejunal, and ileal fluid were determined. In gen-
1642
Ren et al.
Table 1. Composition and nutrient content of the pre-experimental and experimental diets on DM
basis
Ingredient (%)
CSMD1
CMD1
72.16
17.20
2.80
3.00
0.90
1.62
1.00
0.36
0.28
0.38
0.15
0.05
0.10
2,900
17.05
3.80
2.77
0.94
0.54
63.65
7.97
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.60
3.00
3.00
1.34
1.10
1.00
0.60
0.29
0.15
0.12
0.08
0.10
3,150
19.15
6.96
3.72
12.36
3.94
50.35
0.89
0.63
64.37
6.00
5.17
4.00
5.00
4.47
3.00
3.00
1.28
1.14
1.00
0.78
0.29
0.16
0.12
0.12
0.10
3,150
18.66
7.22
3.40
13.42
4.16
48.14
0.89
0.63
1CSMD
Corn
Soybean meal, 43% CP
Cottonseed meal, 42% CP
Peanut meal, 45.5% CP
Rapeseed meal, 36% CP
Corn gluten meal, 60% CP
Soybean oil
Wheat middings
Wheat bran
Expanded soybean
Calcium hydrophosphate
Limestone
Premix2
l-Lys (65%)
Sodium chloride
dl-Met (solid)
Sodium bicarbonate
l-Thr
Choline chloride (50%)
Nutrient content
ME3 (kcal/kg)
CP4 (%)
Crude fat4 (%)
Crude fiber4 (%)
ADF4 (%)
NDF4 (%)
Starch4 (%)
Calcium (%)
Total P (%)
Pre-experimental
diet
1643
Statistical Analysis
The data were tested for homogeneity of variance using the Levene test (Milliken and Johnson, 1984), data
were then analyzed by ANOVA according to a completely randomized design with treatments arranged in
a 2 3 factorial arrangement using the GLM procedures of SAS version 8 (SAS Institute, 1990). An interaction was included in the statistical model as Y = diet
effect + intestinal effect + diet intestine effect + error. Treatment means were separated using orthogonal
contrasts with P < 0.05 considered significant.
Item
Essential amino acid (%)
Arg
His
Ile
Leu
Lys
Met
Phe
Thr
Val
Nonessential amino acid (%)
Ala
Asp
Cys
Glu
Gly
Pro
Ser
Tyr
Total amino acid
CSMD1
CMD1
1.14
0.54
0.69
1.95
1.10
0.37
0.94
0.78
0.85
1.08
1.59
0.36
3.54
0.76
1.16
0.95
0.71
18.51
1.06
0.52
0.64
1.99
1.14
0.36
0.93
0.80
0.83
1.10
1.47
0.34
3.44
0.73
1.16
0.94
0.73
18.18
1644
Ren et al.
Table 3. Effect of dietary protein quality on digestive enzymes in intestinal fluid of chickens
Item
Duodenum
Duodenum
Jejunum
Jejunum
Ileum
Ileum
Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
Amylase,1
U/mL
Lipase,1
U/mL
Trypsin,1
U/mL
Chymotrypsin,1
U/mL
106.1
5.73
430.7
430.3
183.3
232.6
27.96
55.9c
430.5a
207.5b
249.6
238
<0.001
0.617
0.049
0.028
0.992
0.217
1.52
1.27
0.41
0.42
0.05
0.05
0.11
1.40a
0.41b
0.05c
0.66
0.62
<0.001
0.389
0.433
0.123
0.95
0.991
13.4
14.2
49.8
50.5
19.2
20.6
3.34
13.8b
50.2a
19.9b
27.5
28.4
<0.001
0.727
0.992
0.877
0.881
0.764
8.00
6.97
14.5
13.3
4.77
4.46
0.95
7.48b
13.7a
4.58c
9.09
8.25
<0.001
0.291
0.888
0.453
0.39
0.821
acMeans
Diet2
CSMD
CMD
CSMD
CMD
CSMD
CMD
SEM
Main effect
Intestinal section
Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
Diet
CSMD
CMD
Source of variation, P-value
Intestinal section
Diet
Intestinal section diet
CSMD vs. CMD
CSMD vs. CMD
CSMD vs. CMD
Intestinal
fluid
1645
pH,1 mean
(CV, %)
Na+,1
mmol/mL
K+,1
mmol/mL
Cl,1
mmol/mL
Ca2+,1
mmol/mL
Mg2+,1
mmol/mL
Duodenum
Duodenum
Jejunum
Jejunum
Ileum
Ileum
5.17 (3.84)
4.78 (5.60)
8.11 (1.15)
8.12 (1.39)
8.74 (0.90)
8.79 (0.70)
0.069
4.98c
8.12b
8.77a
7.34
7.23
<0.001
0.060
0.007
0.001
0.951
0.627
12.0
16.4
37.8
34.0
58.8
54.6
3.74
14.2c
35.9b
56.7a
36.2
35.0
<0.001
0.698
0.444
0.414
0.48
0.435
13.3
13.2
11.5
11.4
14.7
14.4
0.34
13.3b
11.5c
14.6a
13.2
13.0
<0.001
0.517
0.945
0.85
0.767
0.524
109.4
115.2
102.8
104.0
15.0
16.6
2.16
112.3a
103.4b
15.8c
75.7
78.6
<0.001
0.117
0.509
0.07
0.698
0.605
13.6
15.9
11.6
13.4
4.89
4.91
1.36
14.8a
12.5a
4.90b
10.0
11.4
<0.001
0.228
0.683
0.241
0.363
0.99
8.15
9.41
17.4
21.4
14.3
16.5
0.77
8.78c
19.4a
15.4b
13.3b
15.8a
<0.001
0.001
0.221
0.258
0.001
0.057
Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
acMeans
Diet2
CSMD
CMD
CSMD
CMD
CSMD
CMD
SEM
Main effect
Intestinal section
Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
Diet
CSMD
CMD
Source of variation, P-value
Intestinal section
Diet
Intestinal section diet
CSMD vs. CMD
CSMD vs. CMD
CSMD vs. CMD
Intestinal
fluid
1646
Ren et al.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Ao, T., A. H. Cantor, A. J. Pescatore, and J. L. Pierce. 2008. In
vitro evaluation of feed-grade enzyme activity at pH levels simulating various parts of the avian digestive tract. Anim. Feed Sci.
Technol. 140:462468.
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official
Methods of Analysis. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC.
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2002. Official
Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC International, Arlington,
VA.
Barnett, R. N., S. B. Skodon, and M. H. Goldberg. 1973. Performance of kits used for clinical chemical analysis of calcium in
serum. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 59:836845.
Berot, S., and J. Briffaud. 1983. Parameters for obtaining concentrates from rapeseed and sunflower meal. Qualitas Plantarum:
Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 33:237242.
Braude, R., R. J. Fulforo, and A. G. Low. 1976. Studies on digestion
and absorption in the intestines of growing pigs. Measurements of
the flow of digesta and pH. Br. J. Nutr. 36:497510.
Clemens, E. T., and G. M. Maloiy. 1978. Cyclic changes in the osmolality and electrolyte composition in the gastrointestinal tract
of the rock hyrax. J. Nutr. 108:988993.
Corring, T. 1980. The adaptation of digestive enzymes to the diet:
Its physiological significance. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 20(4B):1217
1235.
Dahlqvist, A. 1962. A method for the determination of amylase in
intestinal content. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 14:145151.
Fordtran, J. S., and T. W. Locklear. 1966. Ionic constituents and
osmolality of gastric and small-intestinal fluids after eating. Am.
J. Dig. Dis. 11:503521.
Furuya, S., K. Sakamoto, and S. Takahashi. 1979. A new in vitro
method for the estimation of digestibility using the intestinal
fluid of the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 41:511520.
Heller, V. G. 1936. Effect of minerals and fiber on avian intestinal
pH. Poult. Sci. 15:397399.
Hendrix, T. R., and T. M. Bayless. 1970. Digestion: Intestinal secretion. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 32:139164.
Knarreborg, A., S. K. Jensen, and R. M. Engberg. 2003. Pancreatic
lipase activity as influenced by unconjugated bile acids and pH,
measured in vitro and in vivo. J. Nutr. Biochem. 14:259265.
Krogdahl, A. 1985. Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry. J.
Nutr. 115:675685.
Low, A. G. 1982. The activity of pepsin, chymotrypsin and trypsin
during 24 h periods in the small intestine of growing pigs. Br. J.
Nutr. 48:147159.
Malagelada, J. R., K. H. Holtermuller, J. T. Mccall, and V. L. W.
Go. 1978. Pancreatic, gallbladder, and intestinal responses to in-