Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INCORPORATED
Research Paper
Presented to the Faculty of
College of Arts and Sciences
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Main Campus
Sta. Cruz, Laguna
ADRIMAR A. ADRIANO
JANUARY 2016
APPROVAL SHEET
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researcher would like to express his deepest thanks to all which
and who gave unselfish support, help, and guidance for the completion of this
research work:
Laguna State Polytechnic University, for offering the course of BS
Mathematics where the researcher belongs;
Nestor
M.
De
Vera
Ph.
D.,
University
President,
for
the
ABSTRACT
Preliminaries
Page
TITLE PAGE..................................................................................................i
APPROVAL SHEET......................................................................................ii
DEDICATION...............................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................iv
ABSTRACT.................................................................................................vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................vii
LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................x
CHAPTER
1
METHODOLOGY
Research Design.................................................................................14
Research Procedure...........................................................................14
Research Instrument...........................................................................14
Mathematical Formulation...................................................................15
10
Recommendations..............................................................................25
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Books.............................................................................................26
B. Journals.........................................................................................26
C. Unpublished Materials...................................................................26
APPENDICES
A. Letter of Request...........................................................................27
B. Final Computation..........................................................................31
C. Answer Report of Final Computation.............................................32
D. Sensitivity Report of Final Computation........................................33
E. Limit Report of Final Computation.................................................33
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................57
CURRICULUM VITAE.................................................................................61
11
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1 Preliminary Data..............................................................................17
2 Linear Programming Matrix.............................................................19
3 Final Solution...................................................................................21
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Linear programming (LP) is a tool for solving optimization problems.
George Dantzig developed an efficient method, the simplex algorithm, for
solving linear programming problems (also called LP). Since the development
of the simplex algorithm, LP has been used to solve optimization problems in
industries as diverse as banking, education, forestry, petroleum, and trucking.
In a survey of Fortune 500 firms, 85% of the respondents said they had used
linear programming. According to Kantorovich (1939) as cited by Dantzig
(1965), there are two ways of increasing the efficiency of the work of a shop,
an enterprise, or a whole branch of industry. One way is by various
improvements in technology; that is, new attachments for individual
machines, changes in technological processes, and the discovery of new,
better kinds of raw materials. The other way-thus far much less used-is
improvement in the organization of planning and production. Here are
included, for instance, such questions as the distribution of work among
individual machines of the enterprise or among mechanisms, the correct
distribution of orders among enterprises, the correct distribution of different
Theoretical Framework
There are several ways to solve a production planning problem. The
most direct of these is extracting all possible solutions and computing the
associated cost of each.
Production planning has expanded with the aim of covering all factors
involved in the problem. As Dantzig (1965) puts it, production planning, also
known as the production smoothing problem is concerned with the problems
of scheduling its production over the number of future time periods, with the
total time span being considered called the planning horizon. The
information available to the planner consists of the following:
Assumptions
The study aimed to:
1. formulate a mathematical model that will yield an optimal production policy
that satisfies the product demand
2. minimize the production and inventory cost and determine the optimal
production plan specifying the number of units of each product to be obtained
from each production source in each future time periods.
3. determine the optimal number of milk, cheese, yogurt and cream to be
produce within a month.
10
they would use the same study about making a production plan.
Definition of Terms
Constraints. A mathematical expression that combine the variables to
express limit on the possible solutions.
Linear programming. A mathematical technique for finding optimal
solutions to problems that can be expressed using linear equations and
inequalities.
Net- profit. The actual profit after working expenses not included in
11
Chapter 2
12
changing conditions that farms face. Based on the type of the research
problem and basic assumptions, the models could be grouped into
deterministic and probabilistic or stochastic (Strauss et al, 2008). When all
required information is supposed to be known with certainty, the model is
deterministic supposing there is no risk (variability) and the decision-making is
done under complete certainty (Lee and Olson, 2006). Additionally, the theory
distinguishes between positive and normative models, wherein normative
models are designed to show what the optimal economic result should be
(Howitt, 2005).
Linear programming (LP) is the most often used mathematical
programming method, even due to its simplified linear and normative nature,
it shows quite accurately what the farmers do or how their behaviour changes
if the production conditions change (Hazell and Norton, 1986). The LP has
been introduced by Dantzig in 1947 (Lee and Olson, 2006) and since then it
has been successfully used in finding an optimal production plan in different
areas, most often with an objective function for maximizing the total gross
margin or net income. LP has been already proven as useful method in farm
production planning (Scarpari M.S. and Beauclair E.G.F, 2010; Alabdulkader
A.M. et al, 2012; Kebede E. and Gan J., 1999; Majewski E. and Was A.,
2005) , whereas Boehlje and Eidman (1984) stressed that this method can be
applied to all resource allocation problem the farmer is faced with. It also
proved to be more applicable for solving complex problems than other more
13
14
Thus, even managers with the right qualities to be successful often fail due to
uncontrollable circumstances.
Efficiency relates to the overall productivity of the dairy farm (Lund &
Hill, 1979). In order to measure efficiency, it is necessary to take into account
all inputs that determine an output. It is critical to analyze efficiency in this
manner because using a measurement that does not take into account all
inputs of production will give a biased result.
Efficient dairy farms often have lower costs of production than
inefficient dairy farms (Mosheim & Lovell, 2009). However, there have been
results in studies that show that efficiency only increases with cow numbers to
a certain point, and then increasing herd size actually leads to a decrease in
efficiency. It has also been shown that long-run average costs sometimes
portray a typical U-shaped graph (Alvarez & Arias, 2003). This means that at
a certain size, farms become less efficient and costs rise. In the past studies
have been conducted that have concluded that this inefficiency can be
overcome by an increase in managerial ability.
A study conducted by Tauer and Mishra (2006) analyzed the factors
that account for inefficiency on dairy farms. They were interested in seeing
what role managerial ability played in reducing inefficiency on dairy farms.
The researchers hypothesized that when a farm adopts a new technology but
does not increase efficiency that it is caused by poor management. Tauer and
Mishra discovered that herd size and farmer age were associated with
15
16
17
cropping pattern in North Darfur State, Sudan. The models gave a cropping
pattern different from the farmers production plan. The solution gave a
profitable objective function while the farmers plan gained them a loss.
An LP model was formulated by Kaur et al (2010) to suggest the
optimal cropping pattern for maximizing net returns and to ensure significant
savings of groundwater use in Punjab. The optimal production plan increased
returns by 4 per percent along with groundwater savings of 26.55 per cent.
Bamiro et al (2012) actualized by LP model the optimal cassava based
combination. The resulting crop combinations resulted in increased gross
margin.
In modeling the economic aspects of the farm, we assume that the
farmer simply seeks to maximize income (Hazel & Norton, 1986). However, in
reality, the production options open to a farmer may be restricted by the need
to observe sound husbandry practices such as crop rotations (Hazel &
Norton, 1986). Crop rotations are important for pest and disease control and
maintaining soil fertility (Hazel & Norton, 1986). In this study, a linear
programming model that incorporates crop rotation requirements is developed
for a rural farmer in Bindura, Zimbabwe
18
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
19
department. After having approved, the researcher had found a subject where
he applied the model for his study. He was allowed by the farm owner to
gather data needed for the completion of this study. After all the data were
collected, the researcher started on modelling the problem.
Research Instrument
An interview with the plant manager will be conducted to acquire
additional information such as production sources, production schedule,
demand and sales strategy of the company, and information regarding the
clients. Each of the products has different shelf lives; therefore the analysis
for the data was defined in a daily basis.
Excel Solver
The researcher will use the Excel Solver to solve linear problems in
forecasting the probable sales of each of the product.
B.
Model Formulation
An optimization problem can be represented in the following way:
Given: a function f : A
element x0 in A such that f(x0) f(x) for all x in A ("minimization") or such that
f(x0) f(x) for all x in A ("maximization").
Typically, A is some subset of the Euclidean space Rn, often specified
by a set of constraints, equalities or inequalities that the members of A have
to satisfy. The domain A of f is called the search space or the choice set,
while the elements of A are called candidate solutions or feasible solutions.
20
the expression
holds; that is to say, on some region around x * all of the function values are
greater than or equal to the value at that point. Local maxima are defined
similarly.
A large number of algorithms proposed for solving non-convex
problems including the majority of commercially available solvers are not
capable of making a distinction between local optimal solutions and rigorous
optimal solutions, and will treat the former as actual solutions to the original
21
22
Chapter 4
Products
Whole Milk
1Liter
Non Fat Milk
1Liter
Non Fat Milk
200ml
Choco Milk
1Liter
Choco Milk
200ml
Live Yogurt
Strawberry
Live Yogurt
Blueberry
Live Yogurt
Nata
Live Yogurt
Mango
Live Yogurt
Pineapple
Demand
Labor and
Production
Cost
Net Profit
Resources
Available
3508
378864
94716
3800
1949
194900
48725
2400
7780
178940
31120
8000
3807
380700
95175
4000
226807
5216561
907228
48000
2902
55718.4
13929.6
1900
2667
51206.4
12801.6
1700
2491
47827.2
11956.8
1500
1895
36384
9096
1400
1778
34137.6
8534.4
1200
23
24
THE CONSTRAINTS:
RESOURCES
99
95
90
70
70
RHS
300
135 80
8200
25
TABLE 2
The table above presents the initial data that had been placed in the
Subjected to:
Yogurt PineappleStorage Capacity of
130
70
280
130
Milk1LNo. of Whole
Milk 1LNo. ofMilk
Non200ml
Fat No. of NonMilk
Fat 1LNo. of Choco
26
27
Chapter 5
28
The program used for this study was the Microsoft Excel solver (2007)
and Microsoft Word (2007).
Findings
The following findings were obtained based on the data that were analyzed:
29
to be produced should be
NUMBER pieces
10. The number of Live Yogurt Pineapple to be produced should be
NUMBER pieces
11. The total amount of income is MoneyPhp.
Conclusions;
The following conclusions were obtained based on the findings of the
study:
1. Through the Mathematical model used in this study, the optimal
numbers of Whole Milk 1Liter to be produced were determined.
2. Through the mathematical model used in this study, the optimal
numbers of Non Fat Milk 1Liter and Non Fat Milk 200ml to be produced
were determined.
3. Through the mathematical model used in this study, the optimal
numbers of Choco Milk 1Liter and Choco Milk 200ml to be produced
were determined.
4. Through the mathematical model used in this study, the optimal
numbers of Live Yogurt Strawberry, Live Yogurt Blueberry, Live Yogurt
Nata, Live Yogurt Mango, and Live Yogurt Pineapple to be produced
were determined.
30
5. Through the mathematical model used in this study, the total amount of
income was determined.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusions taken from the study, the
following recommendations are given:
1. A closer and better forecast can be obtained if there were more data
available in the company, if the sales from the last two months or more
years were given instead of four months.
2. The model has been more efficient and effective if all the products are
considered and maximization of the storage capacity of the plant was
included in the study.
3. Other researchers may also use another kind of software for solving
the optimal allocation of resources and determining the optimal number
of products should be sold in order to maximize the net profit.
4. As the study showed that in order to formulate the mathematical model
of the allocation of resources problem, the objectives must be
determined.
5. Future researchers should have a follow up study on determining the
additional land, labor and capital of a farm using linear programming to
make the model better.
31
Bibliography
A. Books
Dantzig, George B., Introduction to LINEAR PROGRAMMING and
Extension
Hillier F. S. and Lieberman G. S. (2005). Introduction to Operation Research
(8th Edition) New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Johnson, L. A. and W. R. Smythe, (1996). Introduction to Linear
Programming with Application. Prentice Hall, Inc. England Cliffs, New Jersey.
Taha, H. A. (2003). Operation Research: An Inroduction (7th Edition).
Singapore Pearson Education. (Asia) Pte Ltd
Dent, J.B., S.R. Harrison and K.B. Woodford (1986). Farm Planning with
Linear Programming: Concept and Practice, Butterworths, Sydney.
Lewis, Catherine,Linear Programming: Theory and Applications.
B. Unpublished Materials
Dalangin, A. D. and M.C. Gonzalez (2007). Inventory Analysis of a Dairy
Producing Cooperative Unpublished Undergraduate Special Problem,
University of the Philippines-Los Banos, College Laguna.
32
APPENDIX A
LETTER OF REQUEST
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Main Campus
Santa Cruz, Laguna
Greetings!
I am ADRIMAR AQUINO ADRIANO a graduating student of Laguna State
Polytechnic University taking up Bachelor of Science in Mathematics. I am in
the process of preparing my thesis as a requirement for graduation. As a part
of our academic requirement, I would like to conduct a research study entitled
Profit Optimization for Hacienda Macalauan Incorporated.
In view of the above, I am requesting permission to be my client for my
research study. This is for research purposes only; therefore rest assured that
all of the information will be treated confidentially.
Hoping and praying of your esteemed consideration of this humble request.
Thank you very much, more power and God Bless.
Very truly yours,
________________
Adrimar A. Adriano
Student Researcher
Noted by:
_________________
Dr, Merilyn P. Jucalla
Thesis Adviser
33
APPENDIX B
List of
Table 1. Daily
Whole Milk
to Sept. 2015
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
19
0
39
25
29
29
45
23
23
29
24
25
43
47
34
20
22
32
26
24
30
13
27
0
62
30
35
30
18
19
JUL
35
36
13
35
32
17
28
38
29
21
33
27
11
22
42
38
34
28
38
13
27
36
24
28
47
37
15
27
67
55
AUG
29
31
0
37
30
30
35
34
131
18
33
24
36
21
16
33
17
20
28
46
0
5
53
18
20
0
31
19
34
31
SEPT
25
29
25
33
30
21
31
30
85
23
28
29
27
29
33
32
26
28
30
22
22
26
33
22
36
28
25
28
33
24
Demands
Sales for P&B
(1L) from Jun.
34
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
13
5
36
21
3
3
13
7
12
13
5
13
12
4
21
14
14
18
4
14
29
18
23
17
38
29
10
27
JUL
20
28
10
25
19
0
16
26
17
10
20
15
3
16
17
11
21
6
13
1
22
29
15
22
23
9
0
25
22
19
AUG
18
6
0
4
37
21
9
37
13
5
16
33
1
0
49
5
4
7
6
25
0
0
17
0
25
66
19
10
67
6
SEPT
15
9
37
18
23
39
3
21
13
20
16
23
11
32
13
16
43
9
13
11
16
4
8
13
15
23
15
16
16
16
35
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
50
0
90
0
10
0
80
10
50
50
250
289
116
0
20
180
20
25
80
0
280
0
280
70
160
30
0
200
JUL
150
0
150
234
174
0
30
200
60
0
150
150
0
0
235
60
0
204
125
0
100
132
0
150
100
111
0
145
152
70
AUG
50
0
0
110
30
0
0
110
50
0
0
30
110
273
100
60
0
30
50
60
0
40
50
0
0
80
20
10
84
0
SEPT
62
60
61
59
55
58
51
48
41
46
45
42
38
40
43
41
40
37
38
35
32
30
27
29
26
29
27
25
25
21
36
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
5
3
6
13
3
0
1
0
7
2
11
5
18
1
3
9
15
1
8
11
11
0
0
5
22
15
2
27
JUL
6
14
6
18
6
1
12
6
8
13
13
20
0
12
34
8
2
5
15
2
25
12
5
2405
10
3
0
22
19
16
AUG
4
1
0
0
28
15
0
21
4
4
12
0
0
0
60
6
0
3
1
20
0
0
9
0
10
25
16
8
50
1
SEPT
39
38
36
35
33
31
29
27
25
23
20
18
16
13
10
8
5
1
2
5
9
13
16
21
30
30
30
29
29
29
37
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
70
2150
1350
1100
645
0
1230
530
3100
1200
255
3675
3100
0
1650
3985
2180
390
1750
400
3440
0
4770
2295
8470
1300
0
4640
JUL
5750
660
2550
7300
9410
0
1480
6600
1735
150
3780
3900
0
2160
6400
1020
1350
5448
1750
0
3000
2573
2360
100
610
3191
0
3140
3850
4186
AUG
515
1840
0
3710
1450
1400
803
2850
1570
0
2244
1584
2100
993
3850
850
0
2900
3668
2240
0
0
2550
0
1150
2780
3132
1050
2125
835
SEPT
1276
1314
1240
1206
1280
1411
1407
1369
1446
1419
1355
1370
1391
1328
1308
1384
1345
1311
1369
1348
1315
1321
1318
1312
1254
1204
1211
1155
1159
1182
38
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
22
10
18
80
88
0
0
3
30
11
30
29
24
0
25
19
10
33
12
0
30
0
44
18
83
44
0
26
JUL
25
32
12
55
30
0
10
32
20
17
23
27
0
5
0
37
17
19
35
0
16
20
28
24
30
46
0
40
21
10
AUG
51
40
0
20
30
87
27
29
50
0
55
17
50
20
56
32
0
45
15
38
0
10
35
0
10
10
0
24
23
35
SEPT
26
26
25
25
25
25
26
27
27
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
39
Table 7.
for P&B Live
Blueberry
Sept. 2015
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
18
9
26
80
74
0
0
3
20
11
34
25
24
0
15
19
10
34
26
0
20
0
58
21
69
20
0
16
JUL
15
38
17
55
42
0
7
27
18
17
23
31
20
15
0
37
15
25
30
0
20
30
35
10
30
40
0
40
21
0
AUG
46
20
0
20
19
54
41
28
29
25
5
25
36
0
53
25
0
20
15
28
0
0
41
10
41
10
20
9
32
0
SEPT
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
Daily Sales
Yogurt
from Jun. to
40
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
17
0
17
40
25
0
0
17
15
11
28
25
15
0
20
12
10
30
22
0
24
0
24
10
59
22
0
16
JUL
5
21
29
40
38
0
15
37
28
18
20
51
0
5
0
39
54
25
11
12
10
45
21
2
29
24
0
60
29
27
AUG
38
16
0
10
42
25
20
42
20
15
40
10
53
17
46
1
0
5
10
50
0
0
31
0
14
10
13
32
25
26
SEPT
25
24
24
24
24
25
25
24
25
25
24
24
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
24
24
Sept. 2015
41
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
10
8
15
40
29
0
0
10
30
1
34
34
15
0
20
32
10
20
12
0
30
41
0
49
22
0
0
26
JUL
25
21
23
50
29
0
15
51
20
10
21
29
0
7
0
34
21
25
18
0
10
16
27
2
15
42
10
20
10
24
AUG
39
17
0
10
55
12
20
22
22
0
30
10
38
12
26
7
0
10
10
25
0
5
22
0
10
0
10
14
22
31
SEPT
13
13
13
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
9
Table 9. Daily Sales for P&B Live Yogurt Mango from Jun. to Sept. 2015
42
DAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
JUN
0
0
10
0
10
30
31
0
0
0
15
11
18
29
9
0
10
21
10
10
15
0
20
0
26
10
29
29
0
10
JUL
5
24
24
40
17
0
11
31
10
12
23
32
0
5
0
34
10
10
5
0
32
26
20
2
27
15
0
30
12
2
AUG
28
15
0
10
36
30
54
12
11
0
30
10
39
0
36
5
0
10
10
10
0
5
31
0
10
10
9
15
12
29
SEPT
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
Table 10. Daily Sales for P&B Live Yogurt Pineapple from Jun. to Sept. 2015
43
APPENDIX C
FINAL COMPUTATION
44
APPENDIX D
Answer Report of Final Computation
45
Name
income Total
Original
Value
Final
Value
171875
171875
Original
Value
2305.1345
97
2007.6978
74
Final
Value
2305.1345
97
2007.6978
74
0
2007.6978
74
0
2007.6978
74
0
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
0
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
385.47800
72
Adjustable Cells
Cell
$B$
2
$C$
2
$D$
2
$E$
2
$F$
2
$G$
2
$H$
2
$I$
2
$J$
2
$K$
2
Name
no. of Whole Milk 1L
no. of Non Fat Milk 1L
no. of Non Fat Milk 200ml
no. of Choco Milk 1L
no. of Choco Milk 200ml
no. of Yogurt Strawberry
no. of Yogurt Blueberry
no. of Yogurt Nata
no. of Yogurt Mango
no. of Yogurt Pineapple
46
APPENDIX E
Sensitivity Report of the Final Computation
Adjustable Cells
Cell
$B$
2
$C$
2
$D$
2
$E$
2
$F$
2
$G$
2
$H$
2
Name
no. of Whole Milk 1L
no. of Non Fat Milk 1L
no. of Non Fat Milk 200ml
no. of Choco Milk 1L
no. of Choco Milk 200ml
no. of Yogurt Strawberry
no. of Yogurt Blueberry
$I$2
$J$2
$K$
2
Final
Value
2305.134
597
2007.697
874
0
2007.697
874
0
385.4780
072
385.4780
072
385.4780
072
385.4780
072
385.4780
072
Reduced
Gradient
0
0
1.750013
351
0
1.750013
351
0
0
0
0
0
Constraints
Final
Cell
$L$
5
$L$
7
$L$
8
$L$
Name
production and labor cost
Total
Whole Milk 1L Total
Non Fat Milk 1L Total
Non Fat Milk 200ml Total
Value
687500
2305.134
597
2007.697
874
0
Lagrange
Multiplie
r
0.25
0
0
0
47
Cell
$L$
3
Cell
$B$
2
$C$
2
$D$
2Low
er
$E$
2Limi
t
$F$
2 0
$G$
2 0
$H$
2 0
$I$
2 0
$J$
2 0
$K$
2 0
0
0
0
0
9 Target
Value
$L$ Name
Choco Milk 1L Total
10
income
$L$ Total
Choco Milk 200ml171875
Total
11
$L$
Yogurt Strawberry Total
12Adjustable
$L$
Yogurt Blueberry Total
Name
Value
13
2305.134
$L$
Yogurt Nata Total
no. of Whole Milk 1L
597
14
no. of Non Fat Milk
2007.697
$L$
Yogurt Mango Total
1L
874
15
no. of Non Fat Milk
$L$
Yogurt Pineapple
Target
Upper Total
Targ0
200ml
16
et
2007.697
Limit
Resu
no.Result
of Choco Milk 1L
874
lt
no. of Choco Milk
109636.3
2305.134
1718
200ml
0
659
597
75
no. of Yogurt
385.4780
121682.5
2007.697 1718
Strawberry
072
531
874
75
no. of Yogurt
385.4780
171875
0
1718
Blueberry
072
75
385.4780
121682.5
2007.697
1718
no. of Yogurt Nata
072
531
874
75
385.4780
171875
0 1718
no. of
Yogurt Mango
072
75
no. of Yogurt
385.4780
170024.7
385.4780
1718
Pineapple
072
056
072
75
170024.7
385.4780 1718
056
072
75
170024.7
385.4780 1718
056
072
75
170024.7
385.4780 1718
056
072
75
170024.7
385.4780 1718
056
072
75
2007.697
874
0
346.9302
065
346.9302
065
346.9302
065
346.9302
065
346.9302
065
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
APPENDIX F
Limit Report of Final
Computation
48
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
49
Linear
Programming
1)
What is the optimal
number of Whole
Milk 1 Liter to be
produced?
Findings
-tionsRecommenda
Through the
Other researchers
Mathematical model
may also use
used in this study, the
another kind of
optimal numbers of
software for solving
Whole Milk 1Liter to be
the optimal
produced were
allocation of
determined.
resources and
determining the
optimal number of
products should be
sold in order to
maximize the net
profit.
Conclusions
50
Conclusions
Findings
-tionsRecommenda
Conclusions-tionsRecommenda
Trough the
Through
Trough
the the
Future
researchers
Through
the
mathematical model mathematical
mathematical
model
model
should
have
amodel
follow
mathematical
1)
2)
used, the optimal
usedthe
in this
study, the
used,
optimal
study
on the
used up
in this
study,
What are the
What are thenumber of Choco Milk
number
of Choco
Milk
number
of Non
Fat Milk
determining
theMilk
number
of
Non
Fat
optimal numbers of optimal numbers
of and Choco Milk1Liter
1Liter
1Liter
and
Choco Milk
to be
produced
additional
1Liter andland,
Non labor
Fat
Choco Milk 1Liter
Non Fat Milk 1Liter
200 ml is pieces. should
200 be
ml to
be produced
pieces
and
and
capital
of
a
farm
200ml
to
be
produced
and Chcoco Mik
and Non Fat Milk
determined.
for Nonwere
Fat Milk
200 ml
using
linear
was
determined.
200 ml to be
200ml to be
is pieces.
programming
to
produced?
produced?
make the model
better.
Linear
Linear
Programming
Programming
51
Conclusions
Statement of the
Problem
Mathematical
Treatment
Linear
Programming
-tionsRecommenda
Conclusions
Trough the
Through the
mathematical model
mathematical model
used the optimal
used in this study, the
number of Yogurt
number of Yogurt
Strawberry, Yogurt
Strawberry, Yogurt
Blueberry, Yogurt Nata,
Blueberry, Yogurt Nata,
Yogurt Mango and
Yogurt Mango and
Yogurt Pineapple is
Yogurt Pineapple to be
pieces.
produced were
determined.
Findings
Future researchers
should have a follow
up study on
determining the
additional land, labor
and capital of a farm
using linear
programming to
make the model
better.
-tionsRecommenda
52
53
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Information
Date of birth:
Place of birth:
Age:
Sex:
Citizenship:
Civil Status:
Educational Background
Tertiary Level:
Secondary Level:
Elementary Level:
54
Participant:
Participant:
Participant:
Trainee:
On-the-Job Training
LandBank of the Philippines-Sta Cruz Capitol Branch
P. Guevarra St., Brgy. I, Sta. Cruz, Laguna
April 6-May 13, 2014
55