Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Division
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of REALTORS
500 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202.383.1000
The survey is sent to 50,000 REALTORS who are selected through simple random sampling. To increase the response rate, the survey is
also sent to respondents in the previous three surveys who provided their email addresses. The number of responses to a specific question
varies because the question may not be applicable to the respondent or because of non-response. To encourage survey participation, eight
REALTORS are randomly selected to receive a gift card.
2 The team acknowledges Jessica Lautz, Managing Director, Survey Research and Communications, Meredith Dunn, Research
Communications Manager, Amanda Riggs, Research Survey Analyst, and Brandi Snowden, Research Survey Analyst, for their inputs in
improving the survey and in editing and disseminating the report. Acknowledgement also goes to Lisa Herceg, Director, Marketing
Research, who sends out the survey to members.
Table of Contents
Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 3
I.
Summary
While local conditions vary, the REALTORS buyer traffic and the confidence index for single-family
homes remained above 50 in September 2016, indicating that more local markets were strong rather
than weak. The buyer traffic index, an indicator of homebuying interest, was higher than last years
level, indicating better market conditions from one year ago. However, it was lower than the previous
months level, in part due to the seasonal slowdown in some areas. 3 The seller traffic index also rose
slightly from one year ago, but it has remained below 50 since September 2008, indicating that seller
activity is still weak.
First-time homebuyers rose to 34 percent of sales, up from 29 percent one year ago. 4 The last time the
share rose to this level was in June 2012. Sustained job creation, continued low mortgage rates, and the
possibility of future rate increases may have spurred greater participation from first-time homebuyers.
Distressed properties dipped to a new low of four percent of sales. Purchases for investment purposes
made up 14 percent of sales, and cash sales accounted for 21 percent of sales. Nationally, amid tight
supply, half of properties that sold in September 2016 were on the market for 39 days or less compared
to 49 days one year ago.
Lack of supply, declining affordability, appraisal issues, and lender processing delays continued to be
reported as the key issues affecting sales. REALTORS in areas affected by Hurricane Matthew noted
that market conditions have become more uncertain in their areas. Some REALTORS observedthey
expect a slowdown after the presidential election as buyers and sellers assess the direction of economy
and home prices. Still, most respondents were confident about the outlook over the next six months for
single-family homes and townhomes. With home prices increasingly becoming less affordable,
respondents typically expected prices to increase at a slower pace of 3.0 percent in the next 12 months.
September 2016 REALTORS Confidence Index Survey Highlights
RCI Buyer Traffic Index
RCI Seller Traffic Index
RCI Current Conditions: Single-Family Sales
RCI Six-Month Outlook: Single-Family Sales
First-Time Home Buyers, as Percent of Sales
Sales to Investors, as Percent of Sales
Cash Sales, as Percent of Sales
Distressed Sales, as Percent of Sales
Median Days on Market
Median Expected Price Growth in Next 12 Months (%)
Sept 2016
59
44
65
65
34
14
21
4
39
3.0
Aug 2016
61
44
69
66
31
13
22
5
36
3.1
Sept 2015
53
41
61
62
29
13
24
7
49
3.2
An index greater than 50 indicates the number of respondents who reported strong (index=100) outnumbered those who reported
weak (index=0). An index equal to 50 indicates an equal number of respondents reporting strong and weak market conditions. The
index is not adjusted for seasonality effects.
4 NARs 2015 Profile of Home Buyer and Sellers (HBS) reports that among primary residence home buyers, 32 percent were first-time
home buyers. The HBS surveys primary residence home buyers, while the monthly RCI Survey surveys REALTORS and also captures
purchases for investment purposes and vacation/second homes.
I.
Market Conditions
59
44
200801
200806
200811
200904
200909
201002
201007
201012
201105
201110
201203
201208
201301
201306
201311
201404
201409
201502
201507
201512
201605
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Local conditions vary in each state, but the REALTORS Buyer Traffic Index indicates that buyer traffic
was moderate to very strong in all states except in Wyoming, New Mexico, Mississippi, and
Connecticut, where buyer traffic was weak. 6
The Buyer Traffic Index provides information on the level of homebuying demand or interest which may materialize as a contract to
purchase or closed sale after two or three months.
6 The index for each state is based on data for the last three months to increase the observations for each state. Small states such as AK,
ND, SD, MT, VT, WY, WV, DE, and D.C., may have fewer than 30 observations. Respondents were asked How do you rate the past
month's buyer traffic in the neighborhood(s) or area(s) where you make most of your sales? Respondents rated conditions or expectations
as Strong (100), Moderate (50), and Weak (0). The responses are compiled into a diffusion index. For graphical purposes, index
values 25 and lower are labeled Very weak, values greater than 25 to 48 are labeled Weak, values greater than 48 to 52 are labeled
Moderate, values greater than 52 to 75 are labeled Strong, and values greater than 75 are labeled Very strong.
Seller traffic conditions were weak in many states, measured by the REALTORS Seller Traffic
Index. 7 Seller traffic conditions were moderate to strong in several states, including those that had
benefited from the oil boom but are now facing job cutbacks and weak job growth because of lingering
lower oil and natural resources pricesnamely Alaska, North Dakota, Montana, New Mexico, Texas,
Oklahoma, and Louisiana.
Respondents were asked How do you rate the past month's seller traffic in the neighborhood(s) or area(s) where you make most of your
sales? Respondents rated conditions or expectations as Strong (100), Moderate (50), and Weak (0). The responses are compiled into
a diffusion index. A value of 50 indicates a balance of respondents who reported Strong and Weak markets. For graphical purposes,
index values 25 and lower are labeled Very weak, values greater than 25 to 48 are labeled Weak, values greater than 48 to 52 are
labeled Moderate, values greater than 52 to 75 are labeled Strong, and values greater than 75 are labeled Very strong.
Employment conditions affect the supply and demand for housing. The chart that follows shows the
change in non-farm employment in August 2016 from August 2015 by state. Non-farm employment
contracted in the oil-producing states of North Dakota, Wyoming, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana,
while jobs increased only modestly in Alaska, Montana, New Mexico, and West Virginia. 8 In some of
these states, the job cutbacks or slower job growth has led to more home selling. 9 Texas has been more
resilient than other oil-producing states, with employment growing above the national average.
Employment growth was strongest in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah, and buyer traffic was
strong to very strong in these states.
For a review of states in which oil has an outsized economic impact, see this blog:
http://economistsoutlook.blogs.realtor.org/2016/03/21/is-california-an-oil-producing-state/
9
https://communityimpact.com/houston/the-woodlands/economic-development/2015/12/09/falling-oil-prices-starting-to-affect-woodlandseconomy/; http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/06/north-dakota-oil-boom-bust/396620/
10 Respondents were asked What are your expectations for the housing market over the next six months compared to the current state of
the market in the neighborhood(s) or area(s) where you make most of your sales? The responses for each type of property are compiled
into an index. An index of 50 indicates a balance of respondents having weak (index=0) and strong (index=100) expectations or all
respondents having moderate (=50) expectations. The index is not adjusted for seasonality.
11The bill, which was championed by NAR, passed the House of Representatives 427-0 and the Senate under unanimous consent on
September 14, 2016 and was signed by President Obama on September 29, 2016. See http://www.realtor.org/articles/president-obamasigns-hr-3700
100
80
60
48
40
0
200801
200805
200809
200901
200905
200909
201001
201005
201009
201101
201105
201109
201201
201205
201209
201301
201305
201309
201401
201405
201409
201501
201505
201509
201601
201605
201609
20
Single-family
Townhome
Condominium
In the single-family homes market, the outlook in the next six months is strong to very strong in
almost all states. 12 In the townhomes market, the outlook is more mixed in a narrow range, ranging from
very weak to strong. The condominium market shows the most variability with the outlook ranging
from very weak to very strong across the fifty states and District of Columbia.
12 The market outlook for each state is based on data for the last three months to increase the observations for each state. Small states such
as AK, ND, SD, MT, VT, WY, WV, DE, and D.C., may have fewer than 30 observations. Respondents rated conditions or expectations as
Strong (100), Moderate (50), and Weak (0). The responses are compiled into a diffusion index. A diffusion index greater than 50
means that more respondents rated conditions as Strong than Weak. For graphical purposes, index values 25 and lower are labeled
Very weak, values greater than 25 to 48 are labeled Weak, values greater than 48 to 52 are labeled Moderate, values greater than 52
to 75 are labeled Strong, and values greater than 75 are labeled Very strong.
3.0%
2.0%
201607
201603
201511
201507
201503
201411
201407
201403
201311
201307
201303
201211
201207
201203
201111
201107
201103
0.0%
201011
1.0%
The map below shows the median expected price change in the next 12 months among REALTORS
who responded to the JulySeptember 2016 RCI surveys. Price expectations vary by area, and the
median expected price change is a measure that represents the middle value of the distribution of
responses. The areas of strongest median expected price growth are in Washington, Oregon, and South
Carolina where the median expected price growth was more than four to five percent. In California, the
median expected price growth is in the range of two to three percent.
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
13
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
Oct2012-Dec2012
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Oct2012-Dec2012
In many states, REALTORS expect prices to increase at a slower pace in the next 12 months than was
expected in previous months. 13
REALTORS Median Expected Price Change Over the
Next 12 Months in Some West States
CA
OR
WA
CO
NV
UT
The data shown here are states with observations of about at least 150 over the rolling three-month period.
10
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
Oct2012-Dec2012
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
Oct2012-Dec2012
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
MI
MN
OH
WI
GA
NC
SC
11
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
TX
Oct2012-Dec2012
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Jul2016-Sep2016
Apr2016-Jun2016
Jan2016-Mar2016
Oct2015-Dec2015
Jul2015-Sep2015
Apr2015-Jun2015
Jan2015-Mar2015
Oct2014-Dec2014
Jul2014-Sep2014
Apr2014-Jun2014
Jan2014-Mar2014
Oct2013-Dec2013
Jul2013-Sep2013
Apr2013-Jun2013
Jan2013-Mar2013
PA
Oct2012-Dec2012
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
11
Respondents were asked For the last house that you closed in the past month, how long was it on the market from listing time to the time
the seller accepted the buyers offer? The median is the number of days at which half of the properties stayed on the market. In generating
the median days on market at the state level, we use data for the last three surveys to have close to 30 observations. Small states such as AK,
ND, SD, MT, VT, WY, WV, DE, and D.C., may have fewer than 30 observations.
12
150
100
201105
201108
201111
201202
201205
201208
201211
201302
201305
201308
201311
201402
201405
201408
201411
201502
201505
201508
201511
201602
201605
201608
50
All
Foreclosed
Short sale
Non-distressed
Nationally, 44 percent of properties were on the market for less than a month 14. Only ten percent of
properties were on the market for six months or longer.
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
19%
12%
7%
5%
3%
4%
3%
3%
12
Less 1 to less 2 to less 3 to less 4 to less 5 to less 6 to less 9 to less
than 1 than 2 than 3 than 4 than 5 than 6 than 9 than 12 months
month months months months months months months months or more
201509
201608
201609
In many states, half of the properties that sold in JulySeptember 2016 were on the market for less than
31 days. Looking at changes in this value over the last few years, in most states the median length of
time that properties stay on the market continues to fall amid tight inventory conditions. 15 Local
conditions vary, and the data is provided for REALTORS who want to compare local markets against
other states and the national summary.
14
15
Days on market usually refers to the time period from listing date to contract date.
The data shown here are states with observations of about at least 150 over the rolling three-month period.
13
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
OR
WA
14
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
CO
NV
UT
MI
MN
OH
WI
15
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
GA
NC
SC
VA
TX
16
MA
NJ
NY
PA
201103-201105
201106-201108
201109-201111
201112-201202
201203-201205
201206-201208
201209-201211
201212-201302
201303-201305
201306-201308
201309-201311
201402-201404
201405-201407
201408-201410
201411-201501
201502-201504
201505-201507
201508-201510
201511-201601
201602-201604
201605-201607
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
34%
20%
0%
200810
200902
200906
200910
201002
201006
201010
201102
201106
201110
201202
201206
201210
201302
201306
201310
201402
201406
201410
201502
201506
201510
201602
201606
10%
12
First-time buyers accounted for about 32 percent of all home buyers based on data from NARs 2015 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers
(HBS). The HBS is a survey of primary residence home buyers and does not capture investor purchases but does cover both existing and
new home sales. The RCI Survey is a survey of REALTORS about their transactions and captures purchases for investment purposes and
second homes for existing homes.
17
Buyers 34 years old and under, who are likely to be first-time buyers, accounted for 31 percent of
residential buyers in September 2016, (28 percent in August 2016; 28 percent in September 2015). This
slight increase in the share of younger buyers from recent months was offset by a slight decrease in the
share of middle-aged buyers. The share of buyers 34 and under has been on an uptrend from the 26
percent share in July 2013 when this information was first collected in the survey. 16
45%
52%
31%
26%
22%
Age 35 to 55
201609
201607
201605
201603
201601
201511
201509
201507
201505
201503
201501
201411
201409
201407
23%
201311
201307
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Homebuyers who were renting prior to their recent home purchase accounted for 41 percent of sales (39
percent in August 2016; 35 percent in September 2015). The slight increase in buying by previous
renters was coupled with a decrease in buyers who previously owned their home. The fraction of buyers
who were renting prior to their recent home purchase has been increasing from the 36 percent share in
August 2014 when this information was first collected. 17
16
NARs 2015 Profile of Home Buyer and Sellers (HBS) reports that among primary residence home buyers, 31 percent were 18-34 years
old. The HBS surveys primary residence home buyers, while the monthly RCI Survey surveys REALTORS and also captures purchases
for investment purposes and vacation/second homes.
17
NARs 2015 Profile of Home Buyer and Sellers (HBS) reports that among primary residence home buyers, 45 percent renter an
apartment or house. The HBS surveys primary residence home buyers, while the monthly RCI Survey surveys REALTORS and also
captures purchases for investment purposes and vacation/second homes.
18
60% 55%
201608
201606
201604
201602
201512
201510
201508
201506
201504
0%
10%
201502
9%
201412
20%
41%
201410
36%
201408
40%
49%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
0%
200810
200902
200906
200910
201002
201006
201010
201102
201106
201110
201202
201206
201210
201302
201306
201310
201402
201406
201410
201502
201506
201510
201602
201606
10%
Foreclosed
Short sale
The survey asks respondents who had a sale in the month to report on the characteristics of the most recent sale closed.
19
purposes have generally been on the decline, with fewer distressed sales on the market and with home
prices rising to levels that make the purchase less attractive as an investment. Low mortgage rates are
less of a benefit to investors since many of them use cash to purchase a home. 18
30%
25%
20%
14%
15%
10%
0%
200810
200902
200906
200910
201002
201006
201010
201102
201106
201110
201202
201206
201210
201302
201306
201310
201402
201406
201410
201502
201506
201510
201602
201606
5%
18
21%
200810
200902
200906
200910
201002
201006
201010
201102
201106
201110
201202
201206
201210
201302
201306
201310
201402
201406
201410
201502
201506
201510
201602
201606
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
20
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
65%
50%
45%
20%
6%
Investor
International
First-time
buyer
*The RCI survey captures only non-U.S. citizens whose permanent residence is in another country
(Type A). NAR has a separate survey on foreign buyers that captures both Type A buyers and nonU.S. citizens who reside in the United States on work, student, or other types of visas (Type B).
Buyer Downpayments
Among all buyers who are financing a home purchase, 36 percent made a downpayment of at least 20
percent, a share that has remained about the same since NAR began collecting this information in 2011.
50%
40%
30%
20%
0%
201104
201107
201110
201201
201204
201207
201210
201301
201304
201307
201310
201401
201404
201407
201410
201501
201504
201507
201510
201601
201604
201607
10%
Among sales to first-time buyers who purchased a property in JulySeptember 2016 and who obtained a
mortgage, 64 percent made a downpayment of zero to six percent (66 percent in August 2016; 69
percent in September 2015). In June 2009 when NAR first collected this information, 74 percent of firsttime homebuyers obtained loans with a zero to six percent downpayment. Recent moves have been
implemented to make credit more widely available, such as FHAs reduction of its annual mortgage
insurance premiums and GSEs acceptance of three percent downpayment mortgages. However, these
measures do not appear to have made a significant impact on attracting first-time homebuyers, perhaps
due to lack of information about these products. In fact, NARs 2016 Q3 Housing Opportunities and
Market Experience (HOME) Survey found that 37 percent of those aged 34 or under believe that they
need more than 20 percent for a downpayment while only 13 percent believe they need a downpayment
21
of five percent or less. 19 Additionally, although low downpayment loans are available, some buyers may
want to save for a bigger downpayment to save on mortgage insurance premium payments and to avoid
the cost that comes with making a lower downpayment.
Share of First-time Buyers Obtaining a Mortgage Who Put in
a Zero to Six Percent Downpayment as of September 2016*
64%
200906
200912
201004
201008
201012
201104
201108
201112
201204
201208
201212
201304
201308
201312
201404
201408
201412
201504
201508
201512
201604
201608
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
65%
60%
55%
50%
201607-201609
201606-201608
201605-201607
201604-201606
201603-201605
201602-201604
201601-201603
201512-201602
201511-201601
201510-201512
201509-201511
201508-201510
201507-201509
201506-201508
201505-201507
201504-201506
201503-201505
201502-201504
63%
201501-201503
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
19
See: http://www.realtor.org/reports/2016-q3-homeownership-opportunities-and-market-experience-home-survey.
22
Among contracts that had a delayed settlement (30 percent), issues related to obtaining financing,
appraisal, and home inspection were the primary causes of the delay.
Problems Encountered for Contracts That Were Delayed But Eventually
Went Into Settlement in JulySeptember 2016*
(Delayed Contracts Represent 30 Percent of Closed or Terminated Contracts)
Issues related to obtaining financing
Appraisal issues
Home inspection/environmental issues
Titling/deed issues
Contingencies stated in the contract
Issues in buy/sell distressed property
No problems encountered
Home/hazard/flood insurance issues
Buyer lost job
Other
13%
10%
8%
5%
3%
2%
1%
45%
27%
21%
*Based on the respondent's most recent contract that went into settlement or was terminated during this
period. Percentages will not sum to 100 percent because multiple responses are allowed. "Other" includes
buyer or seller backing out, price disagreement, non-price disagreement, HOA issues, builder delays, delays
related to complying with regulation, etc.
The fraction of delays due to appraisals has increased in recent months, in part due to a shortage of
appraisers. 20 The fraction of delays due to financing has accounted for nearly half of all delayed contract
settlements.
Among Contracts That Had Delayed Settlement, Percent of
Contracts with Issues Related to Appraisal
18%
21%
16%
22% 23%
27% 27%
23%
27%
20
23
47% 47%
42% 46%
46% 45%
45% 45%
Among contracts that were terminated (seven percent), issues related to home inspections, obtaining
financing, and appraisals were the major causes of termination.
Problems Encountered for Contracts That Were Terminated
in JulySeptember 2016*
(Terminated Contracts Represent Seven Percent of
Closed or Terminated Contracts)
Home inspection/environmental issues
Issues related to obtaining financing
Appraisal issues
18%
Contingencies stated in the contract
9%
No problems encountered
5%
Issues in buy/sell distressed property
3%
Titling/deed issues
3%
Buyer lost job
2%
Home/hazard/flood insurance issues
1%
Other
24%
28%
24%
*Based on the respondent's most recent contract that went into settlement or was terminated during this
period. Percentages will not sum to 100 percent because multiple responses are allowed. "Other" includes
buyer or seller backing out, price disagreement, non-price disagreement, HOA issues, builder delays, etc.
24
The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of REALTORS, The Voice for Real Estate, is Americas largest
trade association, representing over 1 million members, including NARs institutes, societies, and
councils, involved in all aspects of the real estate industry. NAR membership includes brokers,
salespeople, property managers, appraisers, counselors and others engaged in both residential and
commercial real estate. The term REALTOR is a registered collective membership mark that
identifies a real estate professional who is a member of the National Association of REALTORS
and subscribes to its strict Code of Ethics. Working for America's property owners, the National
Association provides a facility for professional development, research, and exchange of information
among its members, and to the public and government for the purpose of preserving the free
enterprise system and the right to own real property.
The Mission of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of REALTORS Research Division is to collect
and disseminate timely, accurate, and comprehensive real estate data and to conduct economic
analysis in order to inform and engage members, consumers, policy makers, and the media in a
professional and accessible manner.
To find out about other products from NARs Research Division, visit
www.REALTOR.org/research-and-statistics
25