ONE SMPLT ANOVA

ONEWAY Strength BY Brands

/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS.

Oneway

Notes
Output Created

08-SEP-2013 14:08:56

Comments

Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

40
User-defined missing values are treated as

Definition of Missing

missing.

Missing Value Handling

Statistics for each analysis are based on

Cases Used

cases with no missing data for any variable

in the analysis.
ONEWAY Strength BY Brands

Syntax

/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS.

Resources

Processor Time

00:00:00.00

Elapsed Time

00:00:00.00

[DataSet0]

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Strength
Levene Statistic
1.672

df1

df2
3

Sig.
36

.190

.190 > alpha so H0 regarding homogeinity of variances accepted!!!

Moving on to test anova the
ANOVA
Strength
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

df

Mean Square

1986.475

662.158

495.500

36

13.764

2481.975

39

F
48.108

Sig.
.000

Here significance (.000 also called p value) is < alpha, reject H0 for the anova
Thus the means are different!!
ANOVA complete here---------------------------------

POST-HOC-TEST: [To now know which all means are different from each other]
Tukeys test (multiple comparison test)

Ho: Mu(K)= Mu(G)

H1: Mu(K)<> Mu(G

Ho: Mu(K)= Mu(H)

H1: Mu(K)<>Mu(H)

H1: Mu(K)=Mu(T)
H1: Mu(K)<>Mu(T)

H1: Mu(G)=Mu(H)
H1: Mu(G)<>Mu(H)

H1: Mu(G)=Mu(T)
H1: Mu(G)<>Mu(T)

H1: Mu(H)=Mu(T)
H1: Mu(H)<>Mu(T)

ONEWAY Strength BY Brands

/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS.

Oneway

Notes
Output Created

08-SEP-2013 14:08:56

Comments

Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

40
User-defined missing values are treated as

Definition of Missing

missing.

Missing Value Handling

Statistics for each analysis are based on

Cases Used

cases with no missing data for any variable

in the analysis.
ONEWAY Strength BY Brands

Syntax

/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS.

Resources

Processor Time

00:00:00.00

Elapsed Time

00:00:00.00

[DataSet0]

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Strength
Levene Statistic
1.672

df1

df2
3

Sig.
36

.190

ANOVA
Strength
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

df

Mean Square

1986.475

662.158

495.500

36

13.764

2481.975

39

Sig.

48.108

.000

DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet0.

DATASET CLOSE DataSet1.
ONEWAY Strength BY Brands
/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY ALPHA(0.05).

Oneway

Notes
Output Created

08-SEP-2013 14:17:20

Comments

Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Definition of Missing
Missing Value Handling

40
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.
Statistics for each analysis are based on

Cases Used

cases with no missing data for any variable

in the analysis.
ONEWAY Strength BY Brands
/STATISTICS HOMOGENEITY

Syntax

/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY ALPHA(0.05).

Resources

Processor Time

00:00:00.03

Elapsed Time

00:00:00.05

[DataSet0]

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Strength
Levene Statistic
1.672

df1

df2
3

Sig.
36

.190

ANOVA
Strength
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

df

Mean Square

1986.475

662.158

495.500

36

13.764

2481.975

39

F
48.108

Sig.
.000

Post Hoc Tests

Comparison
:
Look @ col1
and Col 2:

Kroger V/s Glad: .948 >

alpha: accept that
kroger and glad are not
Kroger V/s Tuffstuff: .000 < alpha: accept that kroger and Hefty
statistically different
are statistically different ( now the question arises which is better:
to find which mean is better look @ col2: mean difference of the
same:
Kroger V/s Hefty: .900
Krogerthat
Tuffstuff=16 so K>T thus Kroger is better than Hefty
> alpha: accept
kroger and Hefty are
not statistically
different

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Strength
Tukey HSD
(I) Brands

(J) Brands

Mean Difference

Std. Error

Sig.

(I-J)

Kroger

-.90000

1.65915

.948

-5.3685

Hefty

.50000

1.65915

.990

-3.9685

16.10000*

1.65915

.000

.90000

1.65915

.948

Same for4.9685
the rest of
11.6315 combos:
20.5685
G/vs: Kroger:
Accept
-3.5685
5.3685

1.40000

1.65915

.833

-3.0685

5.8685

17.00000

1.65915

.000

12.5315

21.4685

-.50000

1.65915

.990

-4.9685

3.9685

Kroger
Hefty
TuffStuff
Kroger
Hefty

3.5685> T
Reject: Glad

-1.40000

1.65915

1.65915

Same
rest of combos:3.0685
Tufstuff /vs:
.833 for the -5.8685
Hefty:
Reject:
Hefty
is
better
.000
11.1315
20.0685

1.65915

.000
H>T

-20.5685

-11.6315

Glad

-17.00000

1.65915

.000

-21.4685

-12.5315

Hefty

-15.60000*

1.65915

.000

-20.0685

-11.1315

Glad
TuffStuff

15.60000

Kroger
TuffStuff

Lower Bound

the rest of
combos:
G/vs: Tuffstuff:
Upper Bound

Glad

TuffStuff
Glad

95% Confidence
Interval
Same
for

-16.10000

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

We can see from boxes above that T is not better than

anyone so we can say that Dont Buy T
IF there comes K>G>T then we can say that K is best
and T is worst:

Homogeneous Subsets

Slways look for the worst not necressariy thr best

Strength
Tukey HSD
Brands

Subset for alpha = 0.05

1

TuffStuff

10

Hefty

10

34.9000

Kroger

10

35.4000

Glad

10

36.3000

Sig.

19.3000

1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are

displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.000.

.833