You are on page 1of 93

Repair or Alteration of Pressure Vessels

James C. Keenan
Senior Staff Engineer
National Board
Category: Design/Fabrication
Summary: This article was originally published in the Summer 2010 National Board BULLETIN.

The purpose of this article is to briefly identify some of the special requirements applicable to the repair or alteration
of pressure vessels fabricated of quenched and tempered (UHT) materials and, in particular, the additional rules that
should be utilized when repairs or alterations are made to these items.
The most frequent contact with these vessels as a repair organization or inspector is the repair or alteration of overthe-road liquid petroleum gas (LPG) transport vessels. The information contained in this article pertains to vessels
fabricated utilizing Code Case 1204-11 or Section VIII, Div. 1, Part UHT, depending on the year built.
Repairs or alterations to these vessels should follow the rules of Part UHT of Section VIII, Div. 1, and the National
Board Inspection Code (NBIC).
The following paragraphs include a summary of areas to be considered when repairs or alterations to quenched and
tempered materials are encountered.

Design of Nozzles and Other Connections (UHT-18)


UHT-18 requires all nozzle welds to be full-penetration design. There are also specific requirements for nozzle
materials, geometry, and attachment details.

Materials (UHT-5, UHT-6, UHT-18, UHT-86)


All material listed in Table UHT-23 shall be impact-tested as required by UHT-6 in the final heat-treated condition. In
some cases additional drop weight tests may be required based on minimum design metal temperature.
The thickness limitations of the material specification shall not be exceeded.
Prior to the 1994 addenda, only UHT material could be used for head and shell sections joined to each other.
However, addendum 94 revised UHT-5 (b) to now permit the joining of UHT materials to UCS or UHA materials in the
head and shell sections.

Nozzles and reinforcement pads shall be made of material with a specified minimum yield strength within 20
percent of that of the shell to which they are attached; however, pipe flanges, pipe, or communicating chambers may
be carbon, low-, or high-alloy steels welded to nozzle necks of the required material provided the rules of UHT-18 (b)
(1 thru 4) or UHT-18 (c)(1 thru 4) are satisfied.
In general, UHT-28(a) requires all structural attachments and stiffening rings which are welded directly to pressure
parts shall be made from materials of specified minimum yield strength within 20 percent of the materials to which
they are attached. UHT-28 (b) modifies this requirement for certain materials. Its important to note that this includes
all attachments, permanent or temporary, that are welded to the pressure boundary.

Welding & Welding Procedure Qualification (UHT-17, UHT-20, UHT-30, UHT-82, UHT-83, UHT-84, UHT-85 &
Section IX )
Section VIII, Div.1, Part UHT, identifies the rules for welding quenched and tempered materials. Section IX also has
additional requirements for welding these materials:

All category A, B & C and all other welded joints between parts of the pressure-containing enclosure which
are not defined by the category designation shall be Type 1 of Table UW-12 unless otherwise exempted by
UHT-17.

Maximum joint offset values shall meet UHT-20 rather than UW-33 (a).

UHT-30 requires the attachment of stiffening rings to be in accordance with UG-30.

UHT-82 contains the specific requirements regarding the performance of welding and qualification of
welding procedures for these materials. Repair organizations are cautioned to review these requirements
and become familiar with them prior to performing any repairs and/or alterations.

Any surfaces cut by metal melting methods (i.e., torch cutting, arc gouging) that are not to be rewelded shall have
1/16-inch removed by grinding or other mechanical means and be inspected by the MT or PT method after grinding
(UHT-83).
The requirements of UW-35 (a) and UW-51 (b) shall be met except for SA-517 material. The maximum weld
reinforcement shall not exceed 10 percent of the plate thickness or 1/8-inch (3.0mm), whichever is less. Undercut or
abrupt transitions are not permitted on groove, fillet, and butt welds (UHT-84).
Temporary welds shall be removed after they have served their purpose and shall be made using qualified welding
procedures and welders. The base metal shall then be restored to a smooth contour. The removal area shall be
examined by the MT or PT examination method for the detection of cracks. Repair welds, if required, shall be
accomplished utilizing qualified welding procedures and welders and reexamined by MT or PT upon completion
(UHT-85).
As stated in the introduction, the repair organization and inspectors involvement with these materials is generally with
over-the-road LPG transport vessels being repaired or altered. In many cases the manufacturers data report
identifies the head and shell material as T-1 or Code Case 1204 when stamped prior to 1968. After 1968, this material
is identified as SA-517 Grade E or Grade F.
One final note: When selecting a WPS to perform a repair or alteration, it is necessary to perform a thorough review
of the WPS to ensure it addresses all of the essential and supplemental essential variables required by both Part
UHT and Section IX.

Nondestructive Examination (NDE) UHT-57


All welded joints of Type No. (1) Table UW-12 shall be radiographed for their full length in accordance with UW-51
after any corrosion-resistant alloy cover weld has been deposited.

Nozzle attachment welds shall be RT, PT, or MT examined as specified in UHT-57 (b). Corrosion-resistant overlay
weld deposits shall be examined by the PT method.
All welds, including welds for attaching nonpressure parts to heat-treated steels shall be examined for cracks by the
MT or PT method after the hydrostatic test, except as permitted by UHT-57 (d) and (e). If using MT, a method that will
avoid arc strikes shall be used.

Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) UHT-56


All vessels or vessel parts constructed of steels listed in Table UHT-23 shall be post weld heat treated when required
by Table UHT-56.
All welding of connections and attachments shall be post weld heat treated whenever required by Table UHT-56
based on the greatest thickness of material at the point of attachment of the head or shell [(see UHT-56 (b) & (c)].
Caution: Even though UHT-82(g) may exempt these vessels from PWHT requirements the Department of
Transportation (DOT) may require PWHT of tanks constructed in accordance with Part UHT (Ref: DOT, NTTC Spec.
MC-331). If this is the case, welding procedures and welders must be qualified with PWHT. Some minor repairs may
be exempted by DOT; in this case special bulletins have been issued by DOT that further exempts PWHT.

Nameplates (UHT_115)
Do not stamp repair nameplate information directly on vessels with shell thicknesses less than -inch (13mm).
Nameplates are preferred on vessels constructed by this part in all thicknesses in preference to stamping.

Summary
It is hoped this information will make both the repair organization and inspector aware of the additional or different
requirements when repairing or altering vessels made of quenched and tempered steel. This information is not
intended to be used in place of the Code. Individuals using this information must consult the Code for the specific
requirements pertaining to these materials.
For all repairs or alterations to these vessels, it is essential the materials and heat treatment requirements be known.
To accomplish this the repair organization must obtain a copy of the original manufacturers data report or ascertain
the material type through testing. In most cases the data report will be available from the vessel owner. If National
Board registered, it will be available from the National Board.
With safety in mind, repair organizations and inspectors are urged to become familiar with the additional code
requirements prior to performing or authorizing repairs or alterations on these types of vessels.

Oversizing of separator nozzles - any disadvantages? Luis 'Li' Heng Projects Portfolio
Manager at Costain Upstream Hello, In my experience as an Operations-based
Process Engineer, I have faced many instances of production bottlenecks due to
nozzle restrictions. I think it is a shame to restrict production simply because of
nozzles, when nozzles could be slightly oversized upon initial design. Of course,
there is always an element of oversizing due to standard piping sizes - ie one
calculates the required internal pipe ID for a nozzle and then selects the next
standard piping size up. Properly designed and monitored production capacity tests
usually help push the envelope. However, would there be any major disadvantage in
selecting, say, the second next size up? It is always cheaper to fabricate a vessel
with oversized nozzles than modify the vessel or simply add parallel vessels during
debottlenecking campaigns. With a larger than required nozzle, one can install an
adequately sized piping reduction downstream (or upstream) of the nozzle and, in
the future, if production increases, one can easily modify this piece of piping to
accommodate larger flowrates. Personally, I can only see a real problem for inlet
nozzles. The size of inlet devices would indeed be proportionate to that of the
nozzle, which would affect structural design and cost. However, I still think that it is
cheaper to incorporate a larger inlet device upon initial fabrication, rather than
retrofit other inlet devices, modify nozzles or install other vessels to adapt to
increased production. Of course, if the initially installed inlet device is, say, a halfopen pipe, one can easily retrofit a device which allows higher throughputs.
However, if the installed separator is already fitted with the highestthroughput inlet
device type, retrofitting becomes tricky. I have not mentioned any other types of
separator bottlenecks herein, as it is an entirely different subject. Just as for
oversized PSVs, which tend to chatter, has anyone - Operations based professional experienced real-life disadvantages with slightly oversized separator nozzles? Any
views on a theoretical point of view are also welcome. Thank you in advance.

Replacement and repair of nozzles for pressure vessels


US 5918911 A
ABSTRACT
For nozzle replacement, repair and initial installation in ASME pressure vessels, disclosed are nozzles,
nozzle assemblies and nozzle repair assemblies, all of which are mechanically attached and mechanically
sealed to the vessel, i.e., without any welding to the vessel, and in most embodiments without any
welding at all. For nozzle replacement, a part or the entire existing nozzle is removed and a partial or full
replacement nozzle or nozzle assembly is mechanically attached and mechanically sealed to the vessel.
For nozzle repair, the existing nozzle within the bore is not removed, and a mechanical seal is provided
for the existing nozzle which may also be welded or mechanically attached to the repair assembly. Also
disclosed are: a corrosion resistant leak path or paths past the nozzle to the exterior of the vessel and
beyond the insulation surrounding the vessel such that any leakage can visually be detected; an antirotation device or devices which prevent a mechanically attached nozzle part from rotating relative to the
vessel; and an assembly which rotatably couples a sleeve threaded to the bore or a clamp device and a
nozzle or nozzle body so that the sleeve may be tightened without breaking a weld between the nozzle
and the assembly which attaches the nozzle to the sleeve; and a clamp which releasably frictionally
engages a nozzle and releasably attaches it to a sleeve or flange that is mechanically attached to the
vessel.

DESCRIPTION
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/239,177 filed May 6, 1994, (now U.S.
Pat. No. 5,605,361) titled "REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES FOR PRESSURE VESSELS AND METHOD
OF ATTACHING SAME". The entire contents and disclosure of application Ser. No. 08/239,177 (referred
to below as "the prior application") are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention disclosed herein relates to nozzles, nozzle assemblies, and nozzle repair assemblies for
vessels and piping that are installed either initially or as replacements without any welding at all to the
vessel. (A "nozzle" may be, or include as part thereof, a sleeve and/or, piping. A "vessel" may also be
large bore piping.) The invention more particularly relates to nozzles, nozzle assemblies, nozzle repair
assemblies and procedures which replace or repair nozzles that are attached to the vessel on the inside

diameter of the vessel with a J groove structural weld. (The term "nozzle assembly" is sometimes
interchangeably used herein with the term "partial nozzle assembly" which encompasses an assembly
that includes part of an existing nozzle and a partial replacement nozzle or the term "full nozzle assembly"
which encompasses an assembly that includes a full replacement nozzle. Both partial and full nozzle
assemblies in addition may include components such as gaskets, packing glands, a spring, and antirotation and leak path devices etc. These assemblies provide a mechanical attachment of a nozzle to a
vessel, a mechanical seal of a nozzle, or both. The term "nozzle repair assembly" encompasses an
existing nozzle and a structure which mechanically seals the existing nozzle or attaches the existing
nozzle to the vessel without welding to the vessel, or both.) The invention has particular application to
nozzles, nozzle assemblies, nozzle repair assemblies and procedures which replace, repair or initially
install nozzles in ASME pressure vessels and large bore piping of pressurized water reactor (PWR)
nuclear power facilities, either because a nozzle has failed, or to prevent future failure or leakage due to a
phenomenon known as Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking, PWSCC. Repair of a nozzle also
encompasses plugging the bore, for example, replacing a heater with a plug. Further, the invention relates
to replacement and repair of nozzles and assemblies that were previously replaced or repaired.
A typical PWR nuclear power generating facility includes in part a reactor vessel, steam generator,
pressurizer vessel, and a reactor coolant piping system, all of which operate under high pressure.
Nozzles are attached to the vessels and/or piping for a number of purposes, e.g., for connecting piping
and instrumentation, vents, and to secure control element drive mechanisms and heater elements. A
typical pressurizer vessel 20 is shown in FIG. 1 with nozzles 22 for vents, nozzles 24 for sample or liquid
level, nozzles 25 (one of which is shown behind nozzle 24) for pressure sensing, a nozzle 26 for
temperature measuring, and a number of nozzles 27 for heating elements. All of those nozzles were
heretofore welded to the pressurizer vessel at the time of original manufacture.
As shown in FIG. 2, inconel or stainless cladding 29 is welded to the interior of the pressurizer vessel
which is made of carbon steel. The nozzle 26 shown in 5 cross section in FIG. 2, which is exemplary of
the welded nozzles 22 and 24-27, passes through a hole or bore 30 in the pressurizer vessel 20 and is
structurally welded at its interior end 32 to the vessel 20 with a J-groove weld 34 along the interior
opening to the bore 30. The diameter of nozzle 32 is slightly less than the diameter of bore 30, so that
there is a small annular space 36 between the nozzle exterior and the wall of bore 30. In some
applications the nozzles are fit tight to the bore, and in a control rod drive mechanism, they are installed
with a shrink fit process. The J-groove weld 34 also functions as a seal weld to seal the annular space 36.
A reactor vessel (not shown) similarly has nozzles represented by nozzle 26 in FIG. 2 welded thereto. The
piping of the reactor coolant system (not shown) also includes similar nozzles welded thereto. Further
details of pressurizer vessels, reactor vessels, and coolant system piping, in particular, and nuclear power
facilities, in general, are known to those of skill in the art.
As mentioned, the invention has particular application to the replacement of nozzles which have failed,
and to the prevention of nozzle failures and leakage in nuclear power facilities due to the PWSCC

phenomenon, which occurs on components having a susceptible material, high tensile stresses, high
temperature and which are in a corrosive environment, conditions which primarily exist on nozzle
penetrations in the pressurizer vessel, reactor coolant piping, and the reactor vessel. Such failures are
manifested by cracking, which the applicant recognized resulted from several contributing factors. Such
cracking occurs at the grain boundaries on the inside diameter of the nozzle material (Alloy 600) at or
near the heat affected zone of the weld and propagates radially outward through the thickness of the
nozzle which eventually leads to small leakage of the reactor coolant supply. Recently, failures have also
occurred on stainless steel pressurizer nozzles though the failure mechanism is not known.
As indicated, nozzles of these types have failed over time and have had to be replaced or repaired, either
because of a failure in the nozzle or the weld attaching and sealing the nozzle to the vessel. A typical
replacement procedure in a nuclear power plant environment requires shutting down the nuclear power
plant, removing the nozzle, which typically requires machining operations, and welding a replacement
nozzle to the vessel or piping. The welded replacement nozzles currently in use closely duplicate the
original welded nozzle they replace, except that they may be made of a different alloy, e.g., Alloy 690
(less susceptible to PWSCC) instead of Alloy 600, and may also be represented by the nozzle shown in
FIG. 2. Other weld repair methods involve installing a thick weld pad on the outside of the vessel and
structurally welding the nozzle to the pad, and seal welding the interior end of the nozzle to the vessel.
Other refinements to this method involve inserting a thin sleeve between the nozzle and vessel, seal
welding the thin sleeve on the inside diameter of the vessel, and structurally welding the thin sleeve and
nozzle on the outside of the vessel. This methodology promotes less weld residual stress and eliminates
the axial thermal stresses imposed since the nozzle is now free ended and allowed to grow thermally
when the vessel heats up. Still another derivative of the weld pad designs is the use of a partial nozzle
instead of a full nozzle. With this approach, only a portion of the nozzle is removed leaving the cracked
portion of the nozzle remaining in place. A partial nozzle is structurally welded to the weld pad leaving
approximately a 1/16" to 1/8" gap between the existing and new nozzle. A final derivative of the weld pad
is replacing a portion of the existing heater nozzle, otherwise known as a heater sleeve, with a plug
instead of a partial nozzle or sleeve, which is used due to the inherent difficulties of aligning the
replacement nozzle such that the heaters can be reinstalled. Therefore, the failed heater location is
abandoned in place with the plug preventing further leakage. Also, a heater sleeve may be plugged
because a replacement for the failed heater is not available during the repair period, typically a scheduled
outage. The heater will then be replaced during next scheduled outage.
The above partial nozzle replacement and plugs are normally used as last resorts since the carbon steel
vessel is exposed to reactor coolant containing boric acid which can corrode the vessel and since the
failed nozzle can continue to crack with the crack propagating into the base material of the vessel. Boric
acid corrosion, though a concern, has not proven to corrode the vessel bore to any sufficient depth for at
least one nozzle installed in the steam space in the pressurizer, which is in a low oxygen, stagnant
environment. However, corrosion could be a concern for those areas with high fluid flow such as nozzles
on reactor coolant piping.

Another method of plugging a heater location, though currently not used in the industry, involves removing
a portion of the existing nozzle, inserting a new nozzle with split flared ends that compress during
insertion and expand once the nozzle is fully inserted such that the flared ends overlap the inboard end of
the existing nozzle relying on the integrity of the existing nozzle and weld to prevent ejection of the
replaced nozzle. Once the split flared nozzle is installed, a portion of the nozzle is then rolled with high
compressive load expanding the rolled area into the vessel bore, thereby forming a seal therebetween.
After the rolled joint is formed a steel rod is inserted through the nozzle past the split flared ends, which
prevents them from compressing inward, and a seal weld is applied at the outside diameter of the vessel
at the nozzle and rod interface. The inherent problem with this plug is the rolled joint. The rolling process
causes a compressive stress layer in the joint itself, but at the interface between the rolled and non rolled
area, high tensile stresses are imposed which promote cracking. Cracking has been observed in the
rolled transition region on similar repairs used for steam generator A600 tubes. Though this method uses
A690 as the replacement material, A690 is not believed to be immune from PWSCC. Furthermore, the
rolled joint may not be reliable to form a seal for extended periods because of relaxation over time in the
rolled area. Any leakage here would cause severe corrosion to the outside of the vessel because as the
reactor coolant leaks to the atmosphere, it flashes to steam and is in a highly oxygenated environment.
Replacements employing the above-described procedures in a nuclear power plant currently require a
minimum of approximately fourteen days for some types of nozzles (although some claim a minimum of
seven to ten days), and are extremely expensive. Including the lost revenue resulting from plant shutdown, which may be as high as $750,000 per day, the total cost of each repair can result in several
millions dollars if the repair has to be performed in a non-scheduled facility shut down.
The above-described nozzle replacement and repair procedures and any other replacement and repair
procedure that requires welding to the vessel not only is time consuming and therefore expensive, but
also exposes repair personnel to more radiation than the replacement and repair procedures disclosed
herein, particularly where the nozzle replacement or repair procedure involves personnel entering inside
the vessel to perform the procedure. Also, both the original welded nozzle and the known welded
replacement nozzles and methods subject the welded nozzle to high residual stresses imposed by weld
shrinkage. These high residual stresses increase the susceptibility to PWSCC. Thus, the welded
replacement nozzle offers no improvement over the original nozzle in terms of expected life and reduction
of failures, other than any improvement that may result from use of a superior nozzle material. Although,
Alloy 690 material is less susceptible to PWSCC than Alloy 600, it is not known that the change in nozzle
material alone will not eliminate the possibility of nozzle failures. At least three utilities have replaced
nozzles using the original design criteria, Alloy 690 material for the nozzle, and alloy 600 weld material,
and have experienced failures in the weld material itself Based on this information, improved nozzle
replacement and repair methods are needed.
There now appears to be some recognition in the field that replacement and/or repair of nozzles in
pressure vessels of nuclear power plants may proceed without structurally welding a replacement nozzle

to the vessel. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,149,490 and 5,202,082 (both of Brown et al.) and U.S. Pat.
No. 5,404,382 (Russ et al.) (see FIGS. 8 and 9) describe methods and apparatus for replacing a nozzle
for a pressurizer vessel without structurally welding the nozzle to the vessel. Although the replacement
nozzles of the '490 and '382 patents are mechanically attached to the pressurizer vessel, according to
these patents welding is still required to provide the seal between the nozzle and the pressurizer vessel.
Therefore, the residual stresses discussed above are imposed on the nozzle by the weld whether it be a
structural weld or a seal weld, which imposes less stress than a structural weld. The '382 patent discloses
with respect to FIGS. 8 and 9 that the weld seams are free from loading because the nozzle is
prestressed in a such a way that axial and horizontal forces acting on the nozzle are compensated for.
Here, as understood by the applicant, the purpose of the prestressing is to compress the tapered nozzle
against the vessel bore to eliminate lateral movement of the nozzle and bending at the weld location. It
appears that the replacement procedure disclosed in the '382 patent can only be used in those locations
where the inside of the vessel can be accessed such as the reactor head. This method cannot be used in
the heater locations and most likely could not be used in the reactor coolant piping (typically 28" piping
located in a confined area, with a high dose rate that can not be easily shielded).
In the replacement procedure and nozzle described in the '082 patent, the original welded nozzle is not
fully removed, and a mechanical seal is made between the remaining cracked nozzle portion and the end
of the replacement nozzle. Leaving part of the existing nozzle at the interior welded may lead to future
cracking in the existing failed portion of the Alloy 600 nozzle that was not removed from the vessel.
However, further cracking in the base material of the vessel would not likely result in reactor coolant
leakage. Experience and analysis indicate that the base material of the vessel will only crack some
minimum distance into the base material which will not jeopardize the integrity of the vessel. Boric acid
corrosion for this design is less of a concern than the partial nozzle welded design discussed above due
to the fact that there is not an exposed gap between the new and existing nozzle thereby limiting or
eliminating boric acid from contacting the vessel. Partial nozzle designs not having sealing capabilities
between the new and existing nozzle can be justified readily where the nozzles are located in stagnant
region of the pressurizer vessel, e.g. the liquid space or the upper steam space because there is a limited
amount of bore cavity available for the stagnant boric acid to collect and oxidize between fuel cycles and
because the reactant coolant has a low oxygen content. Further, if corrosion does occur, a protective
oxidation layer will form which resists further corrosion in the stagnant environment. Therefore, partial
nozzle replacements without a seal between the existing nozzle and the partial replacement nozzle
appear to be justified for the life of the plant. For those locations in which the partial nozzle replacement
without the seal is not in a stagnant environment, i.e., reactor coolant piping, additional evaluations are
required to justify extended usage. Partial nozzle designs with the seal between the existing nozzle and
the partial replacement nozzle can be used in stagnant environment locations and at high fluid flow
locations; however, a better design practice would be to remove the cracked nozzle to eliminate further
degradation of the vessel. The procedure described in the '082 patent thus has the drawback that a
portion of the failed nozzle remains structurally welded to the vessel and therefore continues to subject
the vessel to the same stresses as the original nozzle, although, as mentioned above, there now appears

to be justification for employing partial nozzle replacements. In any event, the remaining nozzle portion
and the vessel portion surrounding the bore opening are subject to further degradation.
As far as the applicant is aware, the replacement nozzles and replacement procedures disclosed in the
'490 and '082 patents have not been used in a nuclear power facility anywhere, and the replacement
nozzles and nozzle replacement procedures disclosed in FIGS. 8 and 9 of the '382 patent have not been
used in a nuclear power facility in the United States.
A repair procedure has also been developed which does not use welded replacements and plugs. This
repair procedure involves leaving the existing nozzle installed, installing a split flange exterior to the
vessel, applying a split seal at the outside diameter of the vessel and nozzle interface, and providing an
unloaded anti-ejection device. In the event the existing nozzle were to crack due to PWSCC, the seal at
the outside of the vessel is intended to prevent reactor coolant leakage. This repair procedure is intended
as a preventative leakage measure as opposed to an ASME code section XI type of repair or
replacement. Nuclear Regulatory approval may be required before this repair procedure could be used.
However, it has already been installed at one utility as a preventive measure. This methodology does not
prevent PWSCC from occurring. However, without further evaluation it is unknown by the applicant if the
repair is acceptable for the life of the plant. It is possible that if the nozzle began to crack at numerous
locations, the crack could propagate axially from the J-groove weld to beyond the seal incorporated at the
flange. However, if this occurred it would not be a significant safety concern but would require additional
repairs.
The following U.S. patents relate to installing, replacing, repairing or sealing nozzles, sleeves, tubes or
plugs in pressure vessels and piping: U.S. Pat. No. 2,711,841 (Schaefer et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,255,840
(Loch et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,440,339 (Tamai et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,480,841 (Schukei et al.); U.S. Pat.
No. 4,615,477 (Spada et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,653,483 (Margotta); U.S. Pat. No. 4,723,795 (Shenoy); U.S.
Pat. No. 4,826,217 (Guerrero); U.S. Pat. No. 5,091,140 (Dixon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,801 (Dixon et
al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,196,160 (Porowski); U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,895 (Wivagg); U.S. Pat. No. 5,271,048
(Behake et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,274,683 (Broda et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,878 (Porowski); U.S. Pat. No.
5,297,187 (Sodergren et al.) U.S. Pat. No. 5,323,428 (Porter et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,768
(Weems).
Also a method similar to that used in steam generator tube repairs has been proposed with certain
modifications to the Nuclear Regulatory Committee for repairing a leaking nozzle. According to the
proposal, the existing nozzle is rolled and deformed against the ID of the vessel such that a seal is
created between the nozzle and vessel. (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,768 (Weems), cited above). Also, an
optional A690 sleeve could be rolled into the existing nozzle forming a seal therebetween. A similar design
was also proposed for a plug. However, the Nuclear Regulatory Committee declined the proposals
because that rolling technique causes high tensile stresses at the rolled transition region which promotes
PWSCC, and because that repair method may be only leak limiting which could allow the boric acid in the
reactor coolant to erode a portion of the carbon steel vessel.

Nozzles are currently being replaced or repaired in PWR nuclear power facilities both because they have
failed and as a preventive measure where a statistical analysis has indicated a high probability of a future
failure. Nozzle failures and such statistically indicated failures have been occurring frequently enough to
be a major concern for nuclear power plant operators (and owners) for a number of reasons including the
high cost of repairs and the millions of dollars in lost revenue due to plant shut down. Therefore, there is a
need for procedures for replacing and repairing nozzles that have failed or may fail or leak in the future,
that (a) reduce the time and expense required to make the replacement or repair and (b) do not require
confined entry into a pressure vessel, which reduce radiation exposure to the personnel performing the
replacement or repair, and (c) reduce the susceptibility to PWSCC and do not result in further degradation
of the vessel, and accordingly reduce the risk of future failures and leaks. A similar need also exists for a
nozzle for initial installation applications and a method of initially installing such a nozzle in a vessel.
The invention disclosed herein addresses the above-described needs and avoids the problems discussed
above, and provides original nozzles and nozzle assemblies, replacement nozzles and nozzle
assemblies, nozzle repair assemblies and procedures for installing and repairing nozzles and nozzle
assemblies mechanically in pressure vessels in nuclear power facilities (and in other fields) that avoid
some or all of the problems discussed above, and which do not employ a structural weld or a weld of any
kind to the vessel.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the invention disclosed herein to reduce the susceptibility to PWSCC of replacement
nozzles and initial installation nozzles in nuclear power facilities as much as reasonably achievable, and
thereby reduce the possibility of future nozzle failures.
It is another object of the invention to reduce the time and expense involved with installing a replacement
or initial installation nozzle, or repairing an existing nozzle in a vessel, particularly in a nuclear power
facility.
It is another object of the invention to not require confined entry into a vessel in order to install a
replacement or initial installation nozzle in the vessel, or to repair an existing nozzle, particularly in a
nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention to reduce the exposure to radiation of repair personnel in a nuclear
power facility while installing a replacement or initial nozzle installation, or repairing an existing nozzle in a
vessel.
It is another object of the invention to install a replacement or initial installation nozzle in a vessel, or
repair an existing nozzle without structurally welding the nozzle to the vessel, particularly in a nuclear
power facility.

It is another object of the invention to install a replacement or initial installation nozzle in a vessel without
any welding at all, particularly in a nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention to repair an existing nozzle without any welding at all, or at least
without welding the existing nozzle to the vessel, particularly in a nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention when replacing a nozzle in a vessel to remove the entire existing
nozzle and to install a complete (whole) mechanical nozzle replacement, thereby removing the defective
(or possibly defective) portion of the existing nozzle and avoiding further degradation to the vessel.
It is another object of the invention when partially replacing a nozzle in a vessel to not remove the part of
the existing nozzle adjacent the interior of the vessel, i.e., to only remove the part of the existing nozzle
from a point beyond the J-groove weld to the exterior of the vessel, and to install a partial mechanical
nozzle replacement which is sealed to the bore adjacent the remaining nozzle portion, thereby simplifying
removal of the existing nozzle.
It is another object of the invention when repairing an existing nozzle to not remove the nozzle at all, but
to either provide a mechanical seal for the existing nozzle, or attach the existing nozzle to the vessel
without welding the existing nozzle to the vessel, or both.
It is another object of the invention provide a mechanical attachment and/or a mechanical seal in the
repair an existing nozzle without employing a weld of any kind, or optionally, a weld that is not made to
the vessel, e.g., a weld of the existing nozzle to a clamp or flange device located outside of the vessel.
It is another object of the invention to provide nozzles, nozzle assemblies and nozzle repair assemblies
which may be installed in vessels while achieving the objects set forth above.
It is another object of the invention to apply the techniques described herein and in the prior application
for full nozzle replacement to partial nozzle replacement and nozzle repair, and to apply the techniques
described herein for partial nozzle replacement to full nozzle replacement and nozzle repair.
It is another object of the invention to provide a primary and a secondary seal for applicable replacement
and repair assemblies to prevent leakage if the primary seal leaks.
It is another object of the invention to provide a primary corrosion resistant leak path in replacement and
repair assemblies so that in the event the primary and secondary seals leak, corrosion of the vessel
would not occur.
It is another object of the invention to provide a secondary corrosion resistant leak path in replacement
and repair assemblies in the event the primary and secondary seals leak and the primary leak path seals
failed, so that corrosion of the vessel would not occur.

It is another object of the invention to provide a leak path or paths which provide a visual indication of any
leakage in the leak path.
It is another object of the invention to provide a means to prevent nozzle rotation in replacement and
repair assemblies for those parts which may have high torsional loads.
It is another object of the invention to live load the mechanical seals provided by the invention such that
seal shrinkage over time will not cause leakage.
The applicant recognized that the effect of high tensile stresses in nozzles introduced by welds that
structurally attach and/or seal the nozzle to the vessel and the corrosive effect of coolant within the vessel
can be limited by mechanical designs, which are disclosed herein and in the prior application.
The invention(s) disclosed herein and in the prior application achieve the above and other objects by
providing full and partial nozzle replacements and full and partial nozzle replacement assemblies for
vessels, and repairs for existing nozzles, all of which are mechanically attached to the vessel and
mechanically sealed to the vessel, i.e., without any welding at all to the vessel. The invention(s) also
provide nozzle replacement and repair procedures for mechanically attaching and mechanically sealing
existing nozzles, the full and partial nozzles and nozzle assemblies to the vessel, and for repairing
nozzles, also without any welding to the vessel. The replacement and repair techniques, features and
arrangements disclosed herein are also applicable to initial nozzle installation. Therefore, "replacement"
should be understood to encompass initial installation where applicable. Most embodiments of the
invention do not use any weld at all, although some may weld the nozzle to a sleeve or flange that is
mechanically attached to the vessel.
The full and partial replacement nozzles and replacement and repair assemblies are flanged, clamped, or
bolted or compressively loaded to the vessel, and in some embodiments a part of the replacement nozzle
is attached to the vessel with an interference fit. In all embodiments a mechanical seal is obtained using
the interference fit between metal surfaces of a part of the nozzle and the vessel (which surfaces may be
polished), and/or by use of sealing materials. In most embodiments, the seals are live-loaded to selfcompensate for changes in the sealing material after initial installation. Also, in most embodiments, the
parts of a nozzle assembly adjustably compressively load the sealing material, so that a part or parts may
be tightened after initial installation to compensate for shrinkage of the sealing material. In the case of
replacement of an existing nozzle, a part or the entire existing nozzle is removed and a partial or full
nozzle or nozzle assembly is mechanically attached and mechanically sealed to the vessel. In the case of
repair, the existing nozzle within the bore is not removed, and a mechanical seal is provided for the
existing nozzle, and the existing nozzle may also be attached to the vessel without welding it to the
vessel. For use in booth replacement and repair, means are also provided to attach the nozzle to the
vessel without any welding at all via a clamping arrangement engaged at the nozzle and a drive sleeve.
The invention departs significantly from the prior art of nozzle replacement and initial installation by not

utilizing a weld of any kind, which eliminates the stresses imposed by welding and significantly reduces
the risk of a PWSCC type failure, or by not utilizing any weld at all.
The invention(s) disclosed herein further provide a corrosion resistant leak path or paths past the nozzle
or nozzle assembly to the exterior of the vessel should the mechanical seals leak for any reason. The
leak path or paths channel any reactor coolant leakage which may occur through a corrosion resistant
path out past the exterior surface of the vessel and beyond the insulation surrounding the vessel to the
oxygenated environment where the coolant can flash steam without eroding the vessel. Preferably, any
leakage in a leak path or leak paths is visible.
Further, the invention(s) disclosed herein provide an anti-rotation device or devices which prevent a
mechanically attached nozzle part from rotating relative to the vessel.
Still Further, the invention(s) disclosed herein provide a repair assembly which rotatably couples a sleeve
threaded to the bore and a nozzle or nozzle body so that the sleeve may be tightened without breaking a
weld between the nozzle and the assembly which attaches the nozzle to the sleeve. This technique
allows the sleeve to be torqued to tighten a mechanical seal without having to break the weld.
According to one embodiment of the invention, an existing nozzle in a bore of an ASME pressure vessel
is partially replaced by a replacement nozzle or replacement nozzle assembly, which comprises a nozzle
stub opening to the interior of the vessel and extending part way into the bore and a partial replacement
nozzle or nozzle assembly extending therefrom or spaced therefrom to the exterior of the vessel. The
nozzle stub is part of a previously installed nozzle which the nozzle or nozzle assembly is replacing, and
is welded to the vessel where the bore opens to the interior of the vessel. The replacement nozzle or
nozzle assembly also includes the partial replacement nozzle or assembly extending from adjacent the
nozzle stub in the bore, through the bore and exiting the bore to the exterior of the vessel, which is
mechanically attached to the vessel, and one or more mechanical seals of the partial replacement nozzle
or assembly to the vessel. In some embodiments, a mechanical seal is independent of the existing nozzle
stub, and in others cooperates with the nozzle stub to form the mechanical seal.
According to another embodiment of the invention, an existing nozzle in a bore of an ASME pressure
vessel is entirely removed and replaced by a full replacement nozzle or replacement nozzle assembly
extending from the interior of the vessel, through the bore and exiting the bore to the exterior of the
vessel. The full replacement nozzle or assembly is mechanically attached to vessel, and a mechanical
seal is made of the full nozzle or assembly to the vessel when the full nozzle or assembly is mechanically
attached to the vessel.
In the repair embodiments, the existing nozzle remains welded to the vessel at the opening of the bore
extending out of the vessel. A repair assembly is provided comprising a sleeve mechanically attached to
the vessel, e.g., by threading the sleeve to the bore or by a flange bolted to the vessel, with the sleeve

extending into the bore surrounding a substantial portion of the nozzle in the bore. A mechanical seal of
the sleeve to the vessel within the bore is made surrounding the existing nozzle.
If PWSCC were to occur after making a repair as described herein, a portion or all of the existing nozzle
may be removed and a partial or full nozzle replacement made as described herein. The adaptation of the
bore is the same as in the applicable partial or full nozzle replacement, except that part or all the existing
nozzle is removed and a full or partial nozzle is installed.
In the partial and full replacement nozzles and assemblies, and also in the repair assemblies, the
mechanical seal or seals may be entirely within the bore or only at the vessel exterior surrounding the
bore, or both.
Various mechanical arrangements are disclosed for mechanically attaching partial and full replacement
nozzles and assemblies and repair assemblies to the vessel. The nozzle may be one-piece or an
assembly including a nozzle body and another part such as a sleeve or flange for mechanically attaching
the nozzle body to the vessel. In one embodiment, the nozzle or nozzle assembly or repair assembly may
include a sleeve which has exterior threads that engage interior threads in the bore to bolt the nozzle or
assembly to the vessel, or the nozzle or assembly may be configured to engage structure in the bore
when the nozzle or assembly is tightened in the bore to mechanically compressively load the nozzle or
assembly to the vessel. The engaging structure may be interfering sections of the bore and a nozzle part,
e.g., tapered sections of a nozzle part and the bore or a tapered sleeve inserted in the bore, or a flanged
nozzle part and a shoulder in the bore, or a flange engaged with or attached to a nozzle body exteriorly of
the vessel and bolted to the vessel.
In another embodiment, a clamp arrangement frictionally engages the nozzle and a drive sleeve to
mechanically attach the nozzle to the vessel without welding.
The mechanical seal may be provided by sealing material, e.g., gasket material or packing material,
glands or rings compressed between interfering surfaces of the nozzle or nozzle assembly and the bore
or vessel exterior. For example, sealing material may be compressed between tapered surfaces, flanges
and shoulders in the bore and an external flange and the vessel exterior, to name a few. Alternatively, a
mechanical seal may be provided between contacting surfaces such as are compressively loaded
together when the nozzle or nozzle assembly is attached to the vessel or via a shrink fit. Again, the seals
may be live-loaded and also the compression thereof may be adjusted.
In partial nozzle replacement embodiments where the nozzle stub remains in the bore and repair
embodiments where the entire nozzle remains in the bore, the bore may be enlarged around the existing
nozzle and a nozzle, nozzle body or sleeve overlapping the existing nozzle, with sealing material
positioned around the existing nozzle compressed by the end of the nozzle, nozzle body or sleeve. This
embodiment does not axially load the existing nozzle.

This application discloses additional embodiments of full nozzle replacements, and also discloses
embodiments of partial nozzle replacements and existing nozzle repairs. The features and principles
disclosed herein and in the prior application may be utilized for full nozzle replacement, partial nozzle
replacement and nozzle repair. Thus, it will be apparent to those of skill in the technical field to which this
application relates that such features and principles disclosed in connection with one embodiment may be
applied to other embodiments.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary
and not limiting, in which like numerals refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:
FIG. 1 is an elevation view, partially in vertical section, of a conventional pressurizer vessel in a typical
nuclear power generating plant
FIG. 2 is a section view of one of the conventional nozzles attached to the vessel depicted in FIG. 1 taken
along line 2--2 in FIG. 1;
FIGS. 3-7 are section views similar to that of FIG. 2 of embodiments of full replacement nozzles or full
nozzle replacement assemblies and part of the vessel depicted in FIG. 1, identical to FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10
and 12, respectively, of the prior application;
FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 10A, 11 and 12 are section views similar to that of FIG. 4, but depicting embodiments of
partial nozzle replacement assemblies in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which
incorporate a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 4;
FIG. 13 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 3 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 3 and an anti-rotation device;
FIG. 14 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 9 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates features from the embodiments of FIGS. 3 and 13;
FIG. 15 is section view similar to that of FIG. 14 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or feature of the embodiment of FIG. 14 and clamps the replacement nozzle to the
vessel to form a seal at the cladding on the interior of the vessel;
FIG. 16 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 3 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or features from the embodiments of FIGS. 3, 7 and 15;

FIG. 17 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 14 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly
incorporating a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 14 and leak paths, and an anti-rotation
device;
FIG. 18 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 17 depicting a partial nozzle replacement assembly in
which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a feature or features from the
embodiments of FIGS. 9 and 17 with another embodiment of an anti-rotation device;
FIG. 19 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 18 depicting another embodiment of a partial nozzle
replacement assembly in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a
feature or features of the embodiments of FIGS. 5 and 18;
FIG. 20 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 18 depicting still another embodiment of a partial nozzle
replacement assembly in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a
feature or features of the embodiments of FIGS. 5 and 18;
FIG. 21 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 9 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 9;
FIG. 22 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 18 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 18;
FIG. 23 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 19 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 19;
FIG. 24 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 20 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 20;
FIG. 25 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 24 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates the features of FIG. 24 and allows the repair to be installed without cutting the existing
nozzle;
FIG. 26 is a sectional view similar to that of FIG. 22 depicting an assembly for a nozzle which
incorporates the features of FIG. 22 including the option of welding the nozzle to a drive sleeve but which
permits the drive sleeve to be adjusted relative to the vessel to tighten a mechanical seal after the repair
assembly has been in service; and
FIG. 27 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 26 depicting an assembly for a nozzle which incorporates
a feature or features of FIGS. 25 and 26, allows installation without cutting the nozzle and without
employing a weld as in FIG. 25; and allows a drive sleeve or flange to be tightened as in FIG. 26.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


Although the preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings are described below in connection with
replacement of a welded nozzle in the pressurizer vessel and reactor coolant piping of a nuclear power
facility, the invention is not limited to that and encompasses installation of nozzles in other vessels and
piping and the repair of existing nozzles. The invention further encompasses the initial installation of
nozzles in new as well as in existing vessels and piping. Further, the invention inherently encompasses
replacement and repair of nozzles that were previously replaced or repaired. As specifically indicated or
suggested herein, or as will be apparent to those of skill in the art, an attachment or sealing system of an
embodiment or embodiments described herein, or a feature or features of an embodiment or
embodiments described herein may be applicable to, or incorporatable in, other embodiments.
The embodiments of full replacement nozzles and assemblies depicted in FIGS. 3-7 are identical to those
in FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12, respectively, of the prior application. In those embodiments, the original
welded nozzle 26 (FIG. 2) has been completely removed, leaving the J-groove weld. 34 and the cladding
29 surrounding the bore 30 for the nozzle substantially in tact. The old nozzle may be machined or drilled
out; therefore destroying the nozzle. In the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-7 herein, and in the prior
application, the replacement nozzle may be clamped, bolted, flanged, or interference fitted in the bore or
hole of the vessel.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 61 depicted in FIG. 3 (FIG. 6 in the prior application), employs a
compressive loading system for mechanically attaching a nozzle body 62 to vessel 20. The compressive
loading of the nozzle body 62 is accomplished by bolting a cylindrical sleeve 68 to the bore against the
nozzle body 62, which loads the nozzle body in compression within the bore. Here, the nozzle assembly
61 includes the nozzle body 62 and the cylindrical sleeve 68. Loading the nozzle body in compression
makes it less susceptible to PWSCC. If a crack developed in the nozzle body due to PWSCC (or any
other mechanism), since the nozzle body is loaded in compression, the crack will not propagate, or at
least is less likely to propagate. This principle is applied in other mechanical nozzle replacements
discussed below. The nozzle body 62 has a tapered portion 63 which may be a full or partial length taper
ending in a smaller diameter end 64 projecting from the interior entrance of the bore 60 in the vessel 20
and a larger diameter end 65 within bore 60. The nozzle body 62 also includes a tubular portion 66
projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20. The diameter of the tubular portion 66 is smaller than the
larger diameter end 65 of the tapered portion 63, and a flange 67 is formed where the diameter of the
bore changes from the smaller to the larger diameter. The nozzle assembly 61 also includes an externally
threaded cylindrical sleeve 68, and the bore 60 includes a threaded cylindrical portion 69 and a tapered
portion 70. The sleeve 68 has wrenching flats 59 on the exterior circumference thereof for tightening the
sleeve in the bore. Tightening the sleeve 68 in the threaded bore portion 69 against the flange 65 of the
nozzle body forces the tapered portion 63 of the nozzle body into a compressive mechanical engagement
with the tapered portion 70 of the bore 60 to mechanically attach the nozzle body 62 to the vessel 20. A
mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle portion 63 and the

tapered bore portion 70 by engagement of the two surfaces, which are polished as described above and
in the prior application. Sleeve 68 is tightened sufficiently to ensure that the seal is obtained. Instead of
polished surfaces, sealing material as described in the prior application and herein may be positioned
within bore portion 70 between the bore wall and the exterior of the nozzle body 63 to create the seal.
If necessary, a spring washer as described in the prior application or a Belville washer may be employed
between nozzle sleeve 68 and the flange 65 of the nozzle body 62 to live load the seal, i.e., maintain a
resilient compressive loading on the seal which self compensates over time due to seal shrinkage or other
factors. The seals in most of the embodiments described herein may similarly be live-loaded by a spring
or washer, and specific reference thereto is not made in every such embodiment The sealing material
may comprise gasket material or packing material, for example, Grafoil seal material, Grafoil seal rings,
packing glands etc., as is known in the art.
Typically, rings and packing materials may be employed where the seal is radially restrained, e.g., the
sealing material 56 in FIG. 8 between the bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159; and gasket
material may be employed elsewhere, e.g., the sealing material 56 in FIG. 8 between the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152 and the end 73e of the nozzle 71e. The packing material and packing gland may be of
Grafoil, e.g., a Grafoil seal ring as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,826,217 (cited above).
FIG. 4 (FIG. 7 in the prior application) illustrates a replacement nozzle 71 bolted to the vessel. Full nozzle
71 is similar to fill nozzle replacement assembly 61, but is one-piece, and includes a tapered nozzle body
72 having a smaller diameter end 73 at the interior entrance of the tapered bore 60 in the vessel 20, a
tubular end 75 projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20 and a larger diameter, tubular threaded portion
76. The diameter of the nozzle body 72 increases from the interior end 73 to the threaded portion 76.
(Reference numeral 60 indicates a bore with a full or partial taper in it and numeral 30 indicates a
cylindrical bore of a single diameter or a plurality of diameters.) The diameter of bore 60 similarly
increases from the interior end of the bore to a cylindrical threaded portion 77 at the exterior end of the
bore. Wrenching flats 59 are provided on nozzle body 72 adjacent the threaded portion 76 for tightening
the nozzle into the threaded portion 77 of the bore 60. The nozzle 71 is structurally attached to the vessel
20 by tightening the nozzle into the bore, which forces the tapered portion of the nozzle body 72 into
compressive mechanical engagement with the tapered bore 60 to mechanically bolt the nozzle body 72 to
the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle
portion 72 and the tapered bore 60 by engagement of the two surfaces, as described above in connection
with FIG. 3 and in the prior application.
Referring to FIG. 5 (FIG. 10 in the prior application), full nozzle replacement assembly 71c is bolted to
vessel 20 by an exterior flange 86c and bolts 88c. Both the nozzle body 72c and the bore 30 are
cylindrical, and the mechanical attachment of the nozzle assembly 71c to the vessel is achieved by
bolting the flange 86c directly against the exterior wall of the vessel. The flange 86c is a separate piece
from the nozzle body 72c and may be attached to the nozzle body in any suitable manner, e.g., by a weld
87 (which should be stressed relieved prior to installation). However, the flange 86c and nozzle body 72c

may be formed as one piece, as shown in FIG. 11 of the prior application. The flange 86c is contoured to
follow the contour of the exterior wall of the vessel 20 against which it bears. Spacers 91 are provided
between the heads of bolts 88c and the flange 86c. A thin corrosion resistant sleeve 89, e.g., made of
Alloy 690, is shrink fitted or rolled into bore 30 so as to mechanically seal the sleeve 89 to the bore 30.
Sealing material 56 between flange 86c and the exterior vessel wall provides the pressure retaining
mechanical seal.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 71b depicted in FIG. 6 (FIG. 9 in the prior application) is compressively
mechanically attached to vessel 20 by an exterior flange 86 bolted to the vessel 20 by a plurality of bolts
88 and threaded holes 90 in the exterior wall of the vessel Exterior flange 86 is a separate piece from
nozzle 71b (or in an alternate embodiment may be one-piece with or without welding to the nozzle), and is
engaged with nozzle assembly 71b as follows. Nozzle assembly 71b includes a tubular end 75b of
reduced diameter projecting from the vessel 20 which forms a circular shoulder or flange 92. Flange 86
includes a circular recess 94 with a central hole 96 therein. The shoulder 92 on the nozzle assembly 71b
is received in the recess 94 in the flange 86 with the tubular portion 75b of the nozzle body 72b passing
through the central hole 96 in the flange's recess 94. Bore 60 and nozzle body 72b are tapered generally
as described for nozzle 71 in FIG. 4, and tightening bolts 88 causes the flange 86 to draw the nozzle body
72b into bore 60 into compressive frictional engagement therewith. If necessary, spring washers (not
shown) may be provided between the heads of bolts 88 and flange 86. A mechanical seal is obtained
between the exterior of the nozzle body 72b and the walls of bore 60, as described above in connection
with FIGS. 3 and 4.
Full nozzle replacement 110 shown in FIG. 7 (FIG. 12 in the prior application) is frictionally attached to the
vessel 20 and mechanically sealed by an interference fit of the nozzle 110 in the bore 30. Nozzle 110 is
tubular and bore 30 is cylindrical. At equal temperatures of the nozzle 110 and the vessel portion 20
surrounding the bore 30, the diameter of the nozzle is slightly larger than the diameter of the vessel bore.
The nozzle 110 is inserted into the bore by creating a substantial temperature gradient between the two
so that the diameter of the nozzle is reduced or the diameter of the bore is increased, or both. The
temperature of the vessel 20 surrounding the bore 30 is increased to expand the diameter of the bore, or
the nozzle 110 is cooled to reduce its diameter, or both. After the nozzle 110 has been inserted into the
bore 30, the temperature gradient is reduced so that the nozzle 110 frictionally engages the wall of the
bore 30 in an interference fit to both mechanically attach the nozzle and mechanically seal its exterior with
the wall of the bore at the operating temperatures of interest. The exterior of the nozzle and the bore are
polished to assist in creating a seal therebetween. If desired, a mechanical seal or seals, in addition to the
mechanical seal obtained from the interference fit and polished surfaces, may be provided as discussed
herein and in the prior application.
FIGS. 8-20 illustrate embodiments of full and partial nozzle replacement assemblies which are
improvements over the embodiments illustrated in the prior application (including FIGS. 3-7 of this
application which are identical to FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12, respectively, of the prior application), and

which introduce features not disclosed in the prior application as well as applying features disclosed in the
prior application for improved full nozzle replacement and partial nozzle replacement, which may also be
applied to nozzle repair. As indicated above, individual features, or combinations of features, from the
embodiments of FIGS. 8-20 may be applied to other embodiments, or combined in various combinations.
FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 show variations of the full nozzle replacement 71 of FIG. 4 for partial nozzle
replacement assemblies 150, 170, 180, 190 and 190a that include the part (or stub) 152 of an existing
nozzle adjacent the interior of the vessel 20 and a partial replacement nozzle 71e, 71f, 71g, 71h and 71i,
respectively. For FIG. 10A, the partial nozzle replacement assembly 185 is a variation of the full nozzle
replacement of FIG. 7, which includes an existing nozzle stub 152 and a partial replacement nozzle 110a.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 10A, 11 and 12, a portion of the existing nozzle is removed leaving
the nozzle stub 152 extending into or flush to the bore from the interior of the vessel. Both the nozzle stub
152 and its J-groove weld 34 are left in tact and substantially undisturbed. Removal may be accomplished
as described above for removal of the entire nozzle, and in other ways which are known to those of skill in
this art. The vessel bore may be altered only to the extent of threading it adjacent the exterior of the
vessel, and/or it may be enlarged or tapered as described below.
Referring to FIG. 8, a portion 77e of the bore 30 adjacent the exterior of the vessel is enlarged in diameter
and threaded. A shoulder 156 is formed in the bore 30 at the interface of the larger diameter portion 77e
and a smaller diameter portion 30e. The replacement nozzle 71e likewise includes a smaller diameter
portion 158 sized to be received in the smaller diameter bore portion 30e and a threaded larger diameter
portion 76e to be threadedly received in the larger diameter bore portion 77e, and a flange 159 at the
interface of the smaller and larger diameter portions. Sealing material 56 (e.g., packing material) is
positioned in the bore between the bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159. The replacement nozzle
71e is tightened to the bore (using the wrenching flats 59) to compressively mechanically and structurally
attach the replacement nozzle 71e to the vessel 20. Also, tightening the replacement nozzle 71e in the
bore compresses the sealing material 56 between the bore shoulder 159 and the nozzle flange 157 to
mechanically seal the replacement nozzle 71e to the vessel. Another mechanical seal may be provided in
the bore between the interior end 73e of the replacement nozzle 71e and the end 162 of the nozzle stub
152 by sealing material 56 (e.g., gasket or packing material) which also is compressed by tightening the
nozzle to the bore. Where a mechanical seal is provided between the annular edges of adjacent nozzle
sections, such as the end 162 of nozzle stub 152 and the interior end 73e of replacement nozzle 71e, the
edge is chambered at 163 for the new and existing nozzle (not shown) to cause the seal to compress
radially into the nozzle and prevent the packing material from extruding through the gapped region
between the two nozzles. Achieving the seal between nozzle stub 152 and replacement nozzle 71e
requires some axial loading on the existing nozzle stub 152. Alternatively, a gap may be left between the
replacement nozzle 71 and the existing nozzle stub 152 so that the existing nozzle stub 152 is not
subjected to any axial or radial loading which might otherwise stress the J-groove weld 34. The length of
tubular section 158 is selected so that some thread is available in the vessel bore after initial installation
to further tighten the nozzle into the bore during service to compensate for shrinkage of the sealing

material 56. The bore and nozzle or external compression sleeve are similarly threaded in FIGS. 3, 9, 10,
11, 12-24. The mechanical seals formed at bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159, and at the end
162 of nozzle stub 152 and the interior end 73e of replacement nozzle 71e are adjustably-loaded, i.e., the
degree of compression of the respective sealing material 56 may be adjusted during service, for example,
to compensate for seal shrinkage. In most the embodiments disclosed herein, the mechanical seals are
similarly adjustably-loaded, and specific reference thereto will not be made in each embodiment.
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 170 depicted in FIG. 9 differs from the partial nozzle
replacement assembly 150 in FIG. 8 in that the replacement nozzle 7 If of FIG. 9 seals with the existing
nozzle stub 152 around the circumference thereof without axially loading the nozzle stub 152. In this
embodiment, the bore 30 from a point overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 to the exterior of
the vessel is enlarged in diameter to define the enlarged diameter portion 77f and a shoulder 156 in the
portion of the enlarged bore overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stud 152. The enlarged diameter bore
portion 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel. The replacement nozzle 71f is sized to be
received in the larger diameter bore portion 77f and includes a threaded portion 76f threadedly received in
the threaded portion of larger diameter bore portion 77f The ID of the replacement nozzle 71f at the
interior end 174 thereof is enlarged to receive therein the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152. Sealing material
56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is positioned between the bore shoulder 156 and the end 174 of the
replacement nozzle 71f surrounding the end of the nozzle stub 152. The replacement nozzle 71f is
tightened to the bore to compressively, mechanically and structurally attach the replacement nozzle 71f to
the vessel 20. Also, tightening the replacement nozzle 71f in the bore compresses the sealing material 56
against the shoulder 156 and against the outer circumference of the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 to
mechanically seal the replacement nozzle 71f to the vessel. Sealing material 56 (e.g. gasket material)
may also be compressed between the end 162 of the existing nozzle stub 152 and shoulder 175 where
the nozzle ID changes diameter however, this would axially load the nozzle stub.
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 180 depicted in FIG. 10 differs from the partial nozzle
replacement assembly 150 in FIG. 8 in that the replacement nozzle 71g seals axially only with the end
162 of existing nozzle stub 152. The bore 30 is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel, but unlike the
nozzle replacement assembly 150, the bore 30 extending from the end of the nozzle stub 152 to the
exterior of the vessel is not enlarged in diameter, and no shoulder is formed in the bore sufficient to insert
a seal. The replacement nozzle 71g is sized to be received in the bore 30 and includes a threaded portion
76g threadedly received in the threaded portion of the bore. Tightening the replacement nozzle 71g to the
bore mechanically bolts and structurally attaches the replacement nozzle 71g to the vessel 20. A
mechanical seal is provided in the bore between the interior end of the replacement nozzle 71f and the
end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 by sealing material 56 (e.g. gasket material) which is compressed
therebetween when the nozzle is tightened to the bore. The nozzle replacement 170 (FIG. 9) without the
sealing material 56 between the end 162 of nozzle stub 152 and the shoulder 175 of the nozzle 71f is
presently preferred over this embodiment and the embodiment of FIG. 8 because those embodiments
axially load the existing nozzle stub 152.

The partial nozzle replacement assembly 185 depicted in FIG. 10A applies a sleeve 110a in the bore 30,
as described for sleeve 110 of FIG. 7 to mechanically attach and seal the sleeve 110a in the bore 30.
Additionally, sealing material 56 is compressed between the interior end of the sleeve 100a and the end
of 162 of the nozzle stub 152 when the sleeve 110a is attached by hydraulically or other means forcing
the nozzle into the vessel.
FIG. 11 shows another variation of the full replacement nozzle 71 of FIG. 4 for a partial nozzle
replacement assembly 190 that includes an existing nozzle stub 152 adjacent the interior of the vessel 20
and a replacement nozzle 71h. In this embodiment, the bore 60 from which the existing nozzle has been
removed is enlarged in three sections. The bore is tapered in a first section 74h immediately adjacent the
nozzle stub 152, increasing in diameter as the bore progresses towards the exterior of the vessel. In a
second section 182 adjacent the tapered first section 74h, the bore is cylindrical having the largest
diameter of the tapered section 74h. In a third section 77h, the bore has a diameter further enlarged from
that of bore section 182 and is threaded. A shoulder 156 is formed in the bore 60 at the interface of the
two larger diameter sections 182, 77h. The replacement nozzle 71h likewise includes a tapered portion
72h sized to be received in the tapered section 74h of the bore, a smaller cylindrical portion 184 sized to
be received in the cylindrical section 182 of the bore, and a threaded larger diameter portion 76h sized to
be threadedly received in the threaded larger diameter section 77h. The replacement nozzle 71h is
structurally attached to the vessel 20 by tightening the nozzle into the bore, which forces the tapered
portion 72h of the nozzle into mechanical engagement with the tapered section 74h of the bore to
mechanically bolt the replacement nozzle 71h to the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between
the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle portion 72h and the tapered bore section 74h by
engagement of the two surfaces, as described above and in the prior application. A gap 186 is left
between the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 and the interior end of the replacement nozzle 71h. However,
another mechanical seal may be provided in gap 186 as shown in FIG. 12 (described below).
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 190a shown in FIG. 12 is identical to partial nozzle replacement
assembly 190 except that no gap is left between the tapered nozzle portion 72h and the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152, and sealing material 56 (e.g., gasket or packing material) is positioned thereat and
compressed when the replacement nozzle 71i is tightened to the bore to form another mechanical seal
within the bore.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 10, 11, and 12, a shoulder similar to shoulder 156 in FIG. 8 may be provided
in the gap region 188 in the bore, and a flange may be provided on the nozzle similar to flange 159 in
FIG. 8, and another mechanical seal may be provided in this gap, as shown in FIG. 8. (This additional
mechanical seal may also be provided in the embodiments of FIGS. 13, 14, 15 and 16.)
FIGS. 13-16 respectively illustrate full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b, 232 and 242 in which the
existing nozzle has been completely removed. The nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b and 232 in
the embodiments of FIGS. 1315, respectively, employ full nozzles which extend to the interior of the
vessel while the replacement nozzle assembly 242 in the embodiment of FIG. 16 employs a partial nozzle

that terminates within the bore of the vessel sealed with respect to a shrink fit sleeve 244 that extends to
the interior of the vessel and packing material 56. The full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b, 232
and 242 all utilize a nozzle assembly of at least two parts excluding the seals themselves which includes
a drive or compression sleeve threaded to the bore of the vessel like the nozzle assembly 61 shown in
FIG. 3.
Referring to FIGS. 13-16, the procedure for the installing full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b,
232 and 242 removes the existing nozzle entirely, and the vessel bore is altered to provide tapered and/or
larger diameter sections, and/or threads in the bore adjacent the exterior of the vessel.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 61a depicted in FIG. 13, like the nozzle assembly 61 of FIG. 3,
employs a compressive loading system for mechanically attaching the nozzle to vessel 20, and includes a
nozzle body 62a having a tapered portion 63a having a smaller diameter end 64a projecting from the
interior entrance of the bore 60 in the vessel 20 and a larger diameter end 65a within bore 60. The nozzle
body 62a also includes a tubular portion 66a projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20. The diameter of
the tubular portion 66a is smaller than the larger diameter end 65a of the tapered portion 63a, and a
flange 67a is formed where the diameter of the nozzle changes from the smaller to larger diameter. The
nozzle replacement assembly 61a also includes an externally threaded cylindrical drive sleeve 68a, and
the bore 60, includes a threaded cylindrical portion 69a and a tapered portion 70a. Tightening the sleeve
68a (using wrenching flats thereof, not shown) into the threaded bore portion 69a against the flange 67a
of the nozzle body forces the tapered portion 63a of the nozzle body into compressive mechanical
engagement with the tapered portion 70a of the bore 60 to mechanically attach the nozzle body 62a to
the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle
portion 63a and the tapered bore portion 70a by engagement of the two surfaces, as described above.
Sleeve 68a is tightened sufficiently to ensure that the seal is obtained.
The full nozzle replacement assembly 61a described so far with respect to FIG. 13 is basically the same
as for the full nozzle assembly 61 of FIG. 3, except for the lengths of the tapers in the nozzle body 62a
and the bore 60a the length of the taper in the bore and nozzle may vary from embodiment to
embodiment. For example, the taper may be less than 1/2" in length. In addition, nozzle replacement
assembly 61a provides packing material for a secondary seal at the interface of the tapered and
cylindrical sections of the bore (i.e., at the flange 67a of the nozzle), and includes an anti-rotation device
206 described in detail below. Still referring to FIG. 13, a thrust bearing 202 is positioned between the
flange 67a of the nozzle body 62a and the interior end of the nozzle drive sleeve 68a, which facilitates
tightening the sleeve 68a in the bore 60a. Sealing material 56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is also
positioned between the thrust bearing 202 and the interior end of the drive sleeve 68a.
The anti-rotation device 206 is implemented in the full nozzle replacement assembly 61a of FIG. 13 as an
optional feature by an axial slot defined by adjacent slot portions 207a, 207b in the bore 60 and in the

tapered portion 63a of the nozzle body 62a, respectively, and key stock 208 projecting into engagement
with both the axial slot portions 207a, and 207b in the bore and the nozzle.
The full nozzle replacement assembly 61b shown in FIG. 14, like the full nozzle replacement assembly
61a of FIG. 13, is compressively mechanically attached to the vessel and utilizes a tapered bore/tapered
nozzle, but does so without actually tapering the vessel bore. Full nozzle replacement assembly 61b
similar to nozzle assembly 61a of FIG. 13, includes a nozzle body 62b and a threaded drive sleeve 68b.
The nozzle body 62b includes a tapered portion 63b, a cylindrical portion 222 and a flange 224 at the
interface of the cylindrical and tapered portions of the nozzle body. The bore 30 for full nozzle
replacement assembly 220 does not include a tapered portion, and instead includes a smaller diameter
cylindrical portion 226 and a larger diameter cylindrical portion 69b, which form a shoulder 67b at the
interface thereof. Instead of a tapered bore section, a sleeve 204 having a cylindrical OD and a tapered
ID is positioned in the smaller diameter bore section 226 sized to engage the tapered nozzle portion 63b
when the drive sleeve 68b is tightened to the bore. The sleeve 204 has a flanged interior end 223 which
engages the flange 67b in the bore to initially hold and position the sleeve 204 in the bore. Sealing
material 56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is positioned between the nozzle flange 224 and the interior
end of the drive sleeve 68b which is compressed when the drive sleeve is tightened to the bore.
Tightening the drive sleeve 68b to the bore compressively loads the nozzle body 62b to the vessel. Full
nozzle replacement assembly 61b provides a seal at the interface of the different diameter sections of the
bore 226, in addition to the mechanical seal between the tapered surfaces of the nozzle and the sleeve
204.
Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 16, the flange 224 on the nozzle body 62b may be omitted, the tubular
section 222 of the nozzle body adjacent the exterior end of the drive sleeve 68b may be threaded along
with drive sleeve 68b, to mechanically attach the nozzle body to the vessel and compress the sealing
material 56 between the end of the drive sleeve and the flanged portion 223 of the sleeve 204, and lock
nuts may be tightened against the drive sleeve to prevent the drive sleeve from loosening in the event the
vessel or nozzle experiences vibration due to fluid-induced vibration or some other mechanism. As
discussed above full nozzle replacement assembly 61b provides a seal at the interface of the different
diameter sections of the bore, in addition to the mechanical seal between the tapered surfaces of the
nozzle and the sleeve 204. This arrangement allows separate loadings for the two sealing surfaces, and
can be applied to other embodiments as well.
Referring to FIG. 15, full nozzle replacement assembly 232 employs a cylindrical bore 30 threaded
adjacent the exterior of the vessel 20 and a full replacement nozzle that is mechanically attached to the
vessel 20 by a drive or attaching sleeve 68b threaded to the vessel. Full nozzle replacement assembly
232 includes a nozzle body 233, and the drive sleeve 68b and a seal alignment spacer sleeve 235. The
nozzle body 233 has tubular section 234 ending in a flanged end 236 projecting into the interior of the
vessel 20. Spacer sleeve 235 and the end 236 of the nozzle body in the interior of the vessel are flanged
at the angle of the ID of the vessel. Drive sleeve 68b, is threaded adjacent its exterior end and is sized to

be threadedly received in the threaded portion of the bore 30 structurally attaching the sleeve and nozzle
assemble to the vessel. The spacer sleeve 235 is positioned in the bore between the drive sleeve 68b
and the flanged end 236 of the nozzle body 233. Sealing 56a (e.g., a first packing seal ring or gland is
positioned between sleeves 68b and 235 and sealing material 56b (e.g., a second packing seal ring or
gland) is positioned between sleeve 235 and the flanged end 236 of the nozzle body 233. The nozzle
body 233 is positioned in the bore 60a, followed by sealing material 56b, the inner sleeve 235 and sealing
material 56a. The drive sleeve 68b is threaded to the bore 30, and a nut 238 is tightened to a threaded
section 229 of the tubular section 234 of the nozzle body 233 to mechanically compress sealing materials
56a and 56.
Referring to FIG. 16, full nozzle replacement assembly 242 (referred to as a full nozzle since all of the
existing nozzle is removed) employs a bore 30 similar to the one shown in FIG. 14, which includes a
cylindrical section 226 of smaller diameter opening to the vessel interior and a cylindrical section 60b of
larger diameter opening to the exterior of the vessel which is threaded adjacent the opening to the
exterior of the vessel. The cylindrical bore sections 222 and 60b of different diameter form a shoulder 67b
within the bore at the interface of the two sections. The full nozzle replacement assembly 242 includes a
nozzle body 243 having a tubular section 222 and a drive sleeve 68b. The tubular section 222 terminates
within the smaller diameter section 226 of the bore and projections therefrom in an exteriorly threaded
section 229. The drive sleeve 68b is exteriorly threaded adjacent the interior end of the sleeve and sized
to be threadedly received in bore section 60b. The drive sleeve 68b is interiorly threaded adjacent the end
projecting from the vessel. The full nozzle replacement assembly 242 also includes a sleeve 244 shrink
fitted to the cylindrical nozzle section 222 and extending to the shoulder 67b in the bore as described
above in connection with nozzle 110 in FIG. 7, with the end 246 of the nozzle body 243 received in the
end of the sleeve 244. Sealing material 56 (e.g., a packing seal ring or gland) is positioned in the bore
between the shoulder 67b and the flange 204 of the nozzle body. After the sleeve 244 has been shrink
fitted to the bore 30, the sealing material 56 is positioned at flange surface 67b and the drive sleeve 68b
is tightened to the bore to compress the sealing material 56. The threaded section 229 of the nozzle body
243 is threaded to the drive sleeve 68b to structurally attach the nozzle body 243 to drive sleeve 68b
which is structurally attached to the vessel with threads 69b. The locking nuts 228 prevent the nozzle from
loosening.
In the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-4, 6-16 and 21, mechanical seals are provided solely within the
bore. In FIGS. 5, 17-20, and 22-25, mechanical seals are or may be provided also at the vessel OD.
FIG. 17 shows a full nozzle replacement assembly 250 which is a variation of the full nozzle replacement
assembly 61b shown in FIG. 14 and incorporates an anti-rotation device and two leak paths features. The
function of the leak paths is to channel any reactor coolant leakage which may occur through a corrosion
resistant leak path out past the exterior surface of the vessel in a visible manner, e.g., to the oxygenated
environment where the coolant can flash steam without eroding the vessel. Like full nozzle replacement
assembly 220 of FIG. 14, the bore 30 of full nozzle replacement assembly 250 includes a smaller

diameter cylindrical portion 226 and a larger diameter cylindrical portion 69b, which form a shoulder 65b
at the interface thereof. The full nozzle replacement assembly 250 is similar to that of nozzle assembly
61b of FIG. 14 in that nozzle assembly 250 includes a nozzle body 62b and a threaded drive sleeve 68b,
with the nozzle body 62b including a tapered portion 63b, a cylindrical portion 222 and a flange 224 at the
interface of the cylindrical and tapered portions of the nozzle body. As in the full nozzle replacement
assembly 61b of FIG. 14, instead of a tapered bore section, the full nozzle replacement assembly 250
includes a sleeve 204 having a cylindrical OD and a tapered ID positioned in the smaller diameter bore
section 226 sized to engage the tapered nozzle portion 63b when the drive sleeve 68b is tightened to the
bore. Full nozzle replacement assembly 250 (FIG. 17) includes the following additional elements: a first
anti-rotation device 255 for preventing rotation of the sleeve 204 in the bore; a second anti-rotation device
258 for preventing rotation of the nozzle body 62b in the bore, circumferential vapor collection groove
282, first packing seal ring or gland 56a, flat washer 260, Belville washer 262; lantern ring 264; two
concentric packing seal rings or glands 56b, c; axial vapor channel slot 280, gasket 56; channeling sleeve
268; channeling passages 270, and jam nut 271. Full nozzle replacement assembly 250 provides a
primary seal at the tapered sections 226, 63b of the sleeve 204 and the nozzle body 62b, a secondary
seal at the packing seal ring 56a, and a tertiary seal at the packing seal rings 56b, c.
The anti-rotation device 255 (FIG. 17) comprises registered slot portions 271a, b, in the vessel and the
flange 223 of the sleeve 204 and a key stock 208 in the registered slot portions. The anti-rotation device
255 prevents the sleeve 226 from rotating relative to the bore. The anti-rotation device 258 comprises
registered slot portions 271a, b in the sleeve flange 223 and on the nozzle body flange 224, and a
cylindrical key stock 208 in the registered slot portions 271a, b. The anti-rotation device 258 prevents the
nozzle body 62b from rotating relative to the sleeve 204, and thereby from rotating relative to the vessel
20. The slots 271a, b and the key stock 208 for anti-rotation devices 255 and 258 may be of circular or
rectangular cross-section. The flat washer 260 and the Belville washer 262 assist in securely
compressively loading the nozzle body 62b in the bore, and line-load the seals.
As mentioned, the packing seal ring 56a provides a secondary seal to prevent leakage. The packing seal
rings 56b, c. provide a tertiary seal forming a primary leak path with the inclusion of lantern ring 264 that
axially projects between the concentric packing seal rings 56b, c and includes a series of passages 265
spaced circumferentially about the lantern ring extending axially therethrough from one end to the other.
The passages 265 are positioned to extend between the spaced concentric packing seal rings 56b, c into
circumferential groove 276 where the coolant collects and passes through a series of passages 270
spaced circumferentially (i.e., each having a circumferential width of substantially less than 360 degrees)
extending axially from one end to the other of drive sleeve 68b and allows the coolant to escape to the
atmosphere. The finction of the slot 268 in the lantern ring 264 is to collect any fluid which may leak past
an assumed failed seal at the tapered nozzle body 63b and the tapered sleeve 226 interface or the bore
to tapered sleeve 226 interface and the secondary packing seal ring 56a, and to channel the leaked fluid
to the axial passages 265 in the lantern ring 264. Grooves 269 perpendicularly intersecting circumferential
grooves 268 channel the leaked fluid to the circumferential grooves 268. The function of the slot 276 in

the sleeve end 272 is to collect any fluid which passes through the passages 265 in the lantern ring 264
and to channel that fluid to the axial passages 270 in the sleeve 68b. Thus, the primary leak path directs
any fluid passing between the tapered nozzle body portion 63b and the sleeve 204, and/or between the
sleeve 204 and the bore, which also leaks past a failed secondary packing seal ring 56a, to the passages
265 in the lantern ring 264 and the passages 270 in the sleeve 68b, from which the leaking fluid is
discharged at the end 274 of the drive sleeve 68b outside of the vessel. Although not shown, the lantern
ring 264, packing seal ring 56c, and sleeve 274 could easily be modified to channel the primary leak path
between sleeve 274 and nozzle body 62b. The groove 276 is of sufficient depth to allow additional
compression by tightening sleeve 68b should the seal shrink with time.
Elements defining the secondary leak path include: an axial slot 280 in drive sleeve 68b which the
channeling sleeve 268 overlays; and a radial groove 282 extending 360 in the circumference of the drive
sleeve 68b closed by the channeling sleeve 268. The radial groove 282 starts in the axial channel 280
and extends in the drive sleeve 68b past the channeling sleeve 268 where it opens to the outside of the
vessel. Gasket 56 prevents in leakage on to the vessel. Thus, the secondary leak path directs any fluid
passing between the tapered nozzle body portion 63b and the sleeve 204, and/or between the sleeve 204
and the bore, which also leaks past a failed first packing seal ring 56a and a failed second packing seal
ring 56b and/or c to the radial channel 282, which then directs the fluid to axial groove 280 from which the
leaking fluid is discharged outside of the vessel in a corrosion resistant means such that leakage will not
erode the vessel.
FIG. 18 shows a partial nozzle replacement assembly 300 which is a variation of the full nozzle
replacement assembly 250 of FIG. 17, and which incorporates a feature or features from the partial
nozzle replacement assembly 170 of FIG. 9, to provide a partial nozzle replacement assembly that
includes an existing nozzle stub 152 adjacent the interior of the vessel 20. In this embodiment, like nozzle
replacement assembly 170 (FIG. 9), a portion of the existing nozzle is removed leaving the nozzle stub
152 extending into the bore from the interior of the vessel. Both the nozzle stub 152 and its J-groove weld
34 are left in tact and substantially undisturbed. The entire portion 77f of the bore 30 extending from the
end of the nozzle stub 152 to the exterior of the vessel is enlarged in diameter, including a portion 174
overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152. A shoulder 65b is formed in the interface of the smaller
and larger diameter portions. The enlarged diameter bore portion 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of
the vessel. The replacement nozzle assembly 300 includes a nozzle body 62c and a drive sleeve 68c,
similar to nozzle replacement assembly 250 of FIG. 17. However, the nozzle body 62c is configured like
the one piece nozzle 71f of FIG. 9 in that it overlaps the existing nozzle stub 152. The ID of the
replacement nozzle body 62c at the interior end 174 thereof is enlarged to receive therein the end 162 of
the nozzle stub 152, as in replacement nozzle 170 of FIG. 9. A packing seal ring 56a is positioned
between the bore shoulder 67b and the end 174 of the nozzle body 62c, surrounding the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152, and another packing seal ring 56d is applied at the flanged end 174 of the nozzle body
62c. The anti-rotation device 310 of the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300, which differs from the
anti-rotation devices of full nozzle replacement assembly 250, includes an axial slot 171a in the existing

nozzle stub 152 and a tab 208a machined into the nozzle body 62c and radially projecting therefrom into
the slot 171a. If tortional loads are high a plurality of axial slots and tabs can be used.
Alternatively, the anti-rotation device 310 may be formed by axial groove portion, circular or tapered in
nature, in the existing nozzle stub 152 and a similar groove in nozzle body 62c into which the key stock is
inserted and held (several grooves and key stocks could be used if tortional loads demanded such). The
nozzle groove is of sufficient length to allow further compression loading from time to time The nozzle
replacement assembly 300 is otherwise as described for nozzle replacement assembly 250 depicted in
FIG. 17, and includes the primary and secondary leak paths as described for nozzle replacement
assembly 250.
FIG. 19 depicts a partial nozzle replacement assembly 320 similar to the partial nozzle replacement
assembly 300 shown in FIG. 18, but which bolts the nozzle sleeve 68d to the vessel exterior with a flange
87a similar to the one used to bolt nozzle assembly 71c to the vessel as shown in FIG. 5. The nozzle
body 62d is inserted into the bore, and the flange 87a along with channeling sleeve 268 (fabricated and
fillet welded 324 to flange) is sealed against an annular taper guide 322 and the vessel OD by sealing
(e.g., gasket) material 56, and bolted to the vessel exterior with threaded bolts 88c in threaded holes 90c
in the vessel. Taper guide 322 provides alignment of the nozzle to the vessel such that the nozzle may be
compressed into the vessel to form a tight interference fit to resist external bending loads that may be
applied to the nozzle. (Though not shown for the other embodiments this may be applied to all of the
embodiments in this application.) The drive sleeve 68d is then tightened to channeling sleeve 268 to
compressively load the nozzle body 62d to the vessel. The jam nut 271 is then tightened to prevent the
drive sleeve 68d from loosening. This embodiment also provides the same primary and secondary leak
paths and anti-rotation device as in the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300, and is otherwise the
same as the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300.
FIG. 20 depicts a partial nozzle replacement assembly 330 also similar to the partial nozzle replacement
assembly 300 shown in FIG. 18, but which bolts the drive sleeve 68e to the vessel exterior with an
external flange 86a similar to the one used to bolt nozzle assembly 71b to the vessel as shown in FIG. 6.
Exterior flange 86a is a separate piece from drive sleeve 68e (or in an alternate embodiment may be onepiece with the drive sleeve), and is threaded to the drive sleeve 68e. The external flange 86a is bolted to
the vessel exterior by threaded bolts 88 in threaded holes 90 with the sealing (e.g., gasket) material 56
surrounding the taper guide 332 compressed between the end of a sleeve portion 334 of the flange 86a
and the exterior of the vessel. Flange 86a is bolted on in this manner such that it does not have to
conform to the curvature of the vessel as does flange 87a of FIG. 19 which can be difficult for heater
nozzles inserted on the hillside of the spherical shaped head at the bottom of the pressurizer vessel The
drive sleeve 68e is threaded to the flange 86a to compress the packing seal rings 56a-d. This
embodiment is otherwise like the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300 (FIG. 18) and provides the
same primary and secondary leak paths and anti-rotation device.

Although only a single key stock is shown for each anti-rotation device, depending on the tortional loads
experienced by the nozzle, multiple key stocks could be used in combination.
In the embodiments described above, a structurally welded and seal welded nozzle may be full or partially
removed by cutting or machining operations. As mentioned, the invention is also applicable to
replacement of nozzles attached and sealed in other ways, (e.g., as described in the prior art discussed
above and by mechanical attachment and sealing as described herein). A full or partial nozzle
replacement, similar to a nozzle repair described below, may be of the precautionary type in which the
existing nozzle has not failed in any way and the full or partial nozzle replacement by mechanical means
is made for precautionary purposes. Typically, a precautionary replacement will also be made when the
system is shut down for other reasons, such as scheduled refueling in a nuclear facility. Further, the
invention is applicable to the repair of existing nozzles which do not require removal of the existing
nozzle.
FIGS. 21-25 disclose repair embodiments which leave the existing nozzle within the bore in tact, and
further attach the existing nozzle to the vessel and mechanically seal the existing nozzle to the vessel. A
nozzle repair may be used in the event that the existing nozzle leaks or as a precaution in which the
existing nozzle has not failed in any way and the mechanical sealing and further attachment of the nozzle
to the vessel are made for precautionary purposes. In the embodiments of FIG. 21-25, the existing nozzle
is mechanically sealed to the vessel, and may be further attached to the vessel by a fillet weld between
the existing nozzle and a sleeve which is mechanically attached to the vessel. FIG. 26 provides a system
applicable to the embodiments of FIGS. 21-25 which enables the drive sleeve to be torqued even after
the fillet weld is applied to the existing nozzle. In the embodiments of FIGS. 21-24, the existing nozzle is
cut off outside of the vessel to enable mechanical sealing to proceed, and in the embodiment of FIG. 25,
the existing nozzle is left entirely in tact by use of a split seal and flange. FIGS. 21-25 apply to nozzle
repair, features and techniques disclosed herein and in the prior application for full and/or partial nozzle
replacement. Typically, a precautionary repair will be made when the system is shut down for other
reasons, such as scheduled refueling in a nuclear facility.
FIGS. 21-24 depict a nozzle repair assembly 350, 360, 370, and 380 in which an existing nozzle 352 is
left entirely in tact within the bore 30 but is cut off at some point 354 outside of the vessel 20. nozzle
repair assembly 350 of FIG. 21 applies a technique similar to the partial nozzle replacement assembly of
FIG. 9 to nozzle repair. Referring to FIG. 21, the diameter of the bore 30 is enlarged starting at a point
spaced in the bore from the J-groove weld 34 to provide an enlarged diameter bore section 77f as in FIG.
9. The bore section 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel 20 and a sleeve 71f is threaded to
the bore, as in FIG. 9. Sealing (e.g., packing) material 56 positioned between the interior end 174 of the
sleeve 71f and the shoulder 156 formed where the larger diameter bore section 77f meets the smaller
diameter bore 30, and is compressed when the sleeve is threaded to the bore to provide the mechanical
attachment and the mechanical seal. The nozzle repair assembly 350 is the same as the partial nozzle
replacement assembly of FIG. 9, except that the entire existing nozzle 352 is left within the bore and no

changes are made to the existing nozzle (and bore). The existing nozzle 352 may be welded to the sleeve
71f with a fillet weld 356 to provide for further attachment of the nozzle 352 to the vessel 20, functioning
as an anti-ejection device or the sleeve 71f may be modified and a clamping device 406 used as shown in
FIGS. 26 and 27 (described below) to allow the sleeve to be torqued from time to time to compress the
mechanical seal and prevent leakage.
In the nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 depicted in FIGS. 22-24, respectively, the techniques of
the partial nozzle replacement assemblies 300, 320 and 330 of FIGS. 18-20, respectively, are applied to
repairing a nozzle. The nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 are the same as the partial nozzle
replacement assemblies 300, 320 and 330 of FIGS. 18-20, except that the entire existing nozzle 352 is
left within the bore. Also, the existing nozzle 352 in nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 may be
welded to the respective sleeve with a fillet weld 356 to provide for further attachment of the nozzle 352 to
the vessel 20, functioning as an anti-ejection device, or the respective sleeves may be modified as shown
in FIG. 26 for the reason stated above in connection with FIG. 21. The nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370
and 380 of FIGS. 22-24 utilize the leak paths of FIGS. 18-20 and other elements shown in FIGS. 18-20,
respectively. Another difference between the embodiments of FIGS. 22 and 24 and those of FIGS. 18 and
20 and is that in FIGS. 22 and 24 the exterior mechanical seal between the respective sleeve or flange is
made with packing material in a short enlarged bore diameter section 358 defining an annular groove
between the bore and the sleeve at the OD of the vessel, while in FIGS. 18 and 20 the seal is made on
the exterior surface of the vessel OD with gasket material.
The nozzle repair assembly 390 depicted in FIG. 25 is a combination of the nozzle repair assembly 360
and 380 in FIGS. 22 and 24. Nozzle repair assembly 390 utilizes a flange 86c similar to the clamp device
86b of FIG. 24 and a portion 392 of a drive sleeve similar to the drive sleeve 68c of FIG. 22. In addition,
the flange 86c is split and is clamped to the existing nozzle 352 by bolts 394. The split flange 86c
frictionally engages the existing nozzle to mechanically attach the nozzle to the vessel. This enables the
sleeve portion 392 and the clamp device 86c to be attached to the existing nozzle 352 and the vessel 20
without cutting the existing nozzle and without the need for a weld to provide additional structural support.
The sleeve portion 392 mechanically seals the existing nozzle 352 in the same manner as the partial
nozzle replacement assembly of FIG. 18 and the nozzle repair assembly of FIG. 22 are sealed, except
that the clamp device 86c may be tightened to the vessel after initial assembly and tightening of the clamp
device 86c, without breaking any weld, by tightening bolts 88 to compress the mechanical seals therein
after initial installation. However, if desired, the nozzle 352 may also be fillet welded to the clamp device
86c to provide additional support.
FIG. 26 depicts a technique for attaching the sleeve of FIGS. 21-24 to an existing nozzle 352 so that the
sleeve may be tightened to the bore while attached to the existing nozzle. In the nozzle -to- sleeve
attachment 400, the nozzle 352 is welded to a compression ring 402, and the sleeve 61 is rotatably
coupled to the compression ring 402 rather than being welded to the existing nozzle 352. The
compression ring 402 is internally threaded, and an externally threaded tubular sleeve 404 through which

the existing nozzle 352 passes is threaded to the compression ring 402. The tubular sleeve section 404
has wrenching flats 59 is rotatably coupled to the drive sleeve 61 by a mechanical clamp arrangement
406 comprising circumferential grooves 408, 409 in adjacent ends of the drive sleeve 61 and the tubular
sleeve section 404, and a split clamp 412 having annular projections 414, 415. The annular projections
414, 415 of the split clamp 412 are rotatably received and engaged in grooves 408, 409, respectively. A
jam nut 418 is threaded on the tubular sleeve section 404 against the compression ring 402. After the
drive sleeve 61 has initially been installed and tightened, the tubular sleeve section 404, compression ring
402 and jam nut 418 (loosened) are installed and clamped to the drive sleeve 61 with the clamp
arrangement 406, as follows. The compression ring 402 is welded to the existing nozzle with the fillet
weld 356. The tubular sleeve section 404 is turned in a counter clockwise direction such that tubular
sleeve section 404 rotates out of compression ring 402 and compresses the nozzle, with minimal loading,
into the compression ring 402 to load the drive sleeve 61. The jam nut 418 is then tightened. During
service, the loading on the drive sleeve 61 may be adjusted without breaking the fillet weld 356 by
backing off the jam nut 418 and rotating the tubular sleeve section 404 using the wrenching flats 59. The
jam nut 418 is then re-tightened against the compression ring 402. Also, depending upon the torqued
relationship of the compression ring 402, drive sleeve 404 and jam nut 418, the nozzle-to-sleeve
attachment 400 may provide either tension or no load to the existing nozzle 352, or compression as
described above. Where the existing nozzle 352 is either tensioned or not loaded, ring 402 would not be
referenced to as a "compression" ring.
FIG. 27 depicts a technique for attaching the sleeve of FIGS. 21-24 to an existing nozzle 352 so that the
sleeve may be tightened to the bore while attached to the existing nozzle. In the nozzle -to- sleeve
attachment 400 (FIG. 26), the nozzle 352 is welded to a compression ring 402, and the sleeve 61 is
rotatably coupled to the compression ring 402 which is welded to the existing nozzle 352. In the
embodiment of FIG. 27 no weld to the nozzle is employed, and instead the nozzle is frictionally clamped
to the sleeve 61 by a split clamp 420. The split clamp 420 includes the annular projection 414 of clamp
412 which is rotatably received and engaged in the groove 408 of the sleeve 61. The other end of the split
clamp 420 includes a split ring 424 extending into frictional engagement with the nozzle 352. Tightening
the bolt 394 compresses the split ring 424 around the nozzle 352 to frictionally clamp the nozzle. The
sleeve 61 may be tightened simply by loosening bolts 394 on the split clamp 420. Once sleeve 61 is
tightened, bolts 394 are retorqued.
As mentioned above, after implementing a repair according to the embodiments of FIGS. 21-25, a full or
partial nozzle replacement may be made later as described herein for the applicable replacement, e.g.,
FIGS. 17-20. For example, after a repair according to FIGS. 22, 23 or 24 was made, a partial nozzle
replacement according to FIGS. 18, 19 or 20, respectively, may be made, and after the repair shown in
FIG. 22 was made, the full nozzle replacement shown in FIG. 17 may be made. Other variations will be
apparent to those of skill in the art from the disclosure herein.

As also mentioned above, the implementations described herein of the nozzle replacements and repairs
avoid all or some of the problems discussed above, and the embodiment of FIG. 17 avoids all of the
problems discussed above. The partial nozzle replacements, such as the embodiment of FIG. 18, avoid
all the concerns except that of continued cracking. Partial nozzle replacements that do not have sealing
between the new and existing nozzles, such as the embodiment of FIG. 11, may not over come all the
corrosion concerns if they are placed in an environment that is not stagnant. While further analysis,
evaluation and information is necessary to determine whether all of the embodiments disclosed herein are
acceptable for the life of the facility, they are all believed to be acceptable for at least short term, most
likely long term, and in most cases the life of plant given that they are installed in the locations for which
they were designed, e.g., those embodiments with a gap between the existing and new partial nozzle are
in stagnant environments, and repaired nozzles include fracture mechanic evaluations justifying that the
nozzle will not continue to crack beyond the seal. However, the repair embodiments and the partial nozzle
replacement embodiments not employing seals between the existing and new partial nozzle (in
environments which may not be suitable for long term corrosion concerns) could at least be used for an
interim period until such time it was determined necessary or prudent to replace the repaired nozzle or
partial nozzle with one of the other full or partial nozzle replacement embodiments described herein. In
certain circumstances, such as particular plant modes of operation, one repair or replacement
embodiment or technique may be more suitable than another given these conditions. Those experienced
in the art are capable of making the determination as to whether or not a particular embodiment or
technique used for a particular application can be considered short term, long term, or a life of plant repair
or replacement. In the event the repair or replacement is considered as interim and it becomes necessary,
those experienced in the art can select the appropriate full or partial nozzle replacement that corresponds
to the repair or partial nozzle previously used.
As indicated above, rather than replace all or part of an existing nozzle or repair an existing nozzle, the
invention can be applied to provide a plug, particularly for a heater sleeve. For example, in the case of a
failed heater and heater sleeve, the heater sleeve may be fully or partially removed and replaced as
described above but with a plug or capped nozzle rather than a nozzle due to the fact that a new heater
may not be available.
All of the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-26 may be used in large bore piping, as well as pressure
vessels in general, and do not require entry into the vessel or pipe or a remote system to install them.
In the claims, the term vessel is used in a broad sense and, unless otherwise indicated, is meant to
include, but not to be limited to, vessels, piping, etc., of different types which may operate under pressure
and which may be used in different nuclear and non-nuclear ASME pressure vessel applications, and the
term nozzle is used in a broad sense and is meant to include, but not be limited to, nozzles, sleeves, large
bore pipes, pipe portions, etc. Also, where applicable in the claims, "nozzle" encompasses a nozzle
assembly, which may include a nozzle having one or more parts, seals, one or more anti-rotation devices,
and one or more leak paths.

While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many
variations and modifications, as will be evident to those skilled in this art, may be made without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, it will be apparent that one or more features in
one embodiment may be applicable to other embodiments, or applied to a full or partial nozzle
replacement, or to a repair. Although many examples are described above, specific reference of the
applicability of a feature described in connection with one embodiment is not made in every other
applicable embodiment One such example is that the thrust bearing 202 in FIG. 13 may be used in the
embodiments depicted in many of the other figures. Other examples will be apparent to those of skill in
this art.
Therefore, the invention, as set forth in the appended claims, is not to be limited to the precise details of
construction set forth above, as such variations and modifications are intended to be included within the
spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

CLAIMS(65)
What is claimed is:
1. The combination of a nozzle assembly and an ASME pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a nozzle stub coaxial with said bore which opens to the interior of said vessel, extends therefrom part way
into said bore and terminates therein, said nozzle stub being welded to said vessel where said bore
opens to the interior of said vessel;
a partial nozzle extending from the vicinity of said nozzle stub in said bore, through said bore and exiting
said bore to the exterior of said vessel, said partial nozzle having at least one section within said bore
coaxial with said nozzle stub which has an outer diameter larger than the outer diameter of said nozzle
stub;
a mechanical coupling of said partial nozzle to said vessel operative to provide a mechanical attachment
of said partial nozzle to said vessel, said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said partial
nozzle and said vessel;
said bore having a smaller diameter section surrounding at least part of said nozzle stub and a larger
diameter section surrounding said at least one section of said partial nozzle, said bore having a shoulder
where the smaller and larger diameter sections thereof meet;
at least a part of said at least one section of said partial nozzle in said bore and at least a part of said
shoulder in said bore having a same diameter; and
a mechanical non-welded seal of said partial nozzle in said bore comprising sealing material positioned in
said bore compressed by action of said at least one section of said partial nozzle and said shoulder of
said bore.
2. The combination of claim 1 wherein said mechanical coupling comprises interior threads in said bore
and exterior threads on said partial nozzle positioned to engage said interior threads in said bore, said
mechanical attachment including structure in said bore and structure on said partial nozzle configured to
engage in said bore in a tightened condition of said partial nozzle in said bore to provide said mechanical
attachment of said partial nozzle to said vessel.
3. The combination of claim 1 wherein said mechanical coupling comprises bolts threaded to said vessel
and a flange, said mechanical coupling including a coupling of said bolts to said flange and a coupling of
said flange to said partial nozzle.
4. The combination of claim 3 comprising another mechanical seal of said partial nozzle to said vessel
which includes sealing material compressed between said flange and the exterior of said vessel.
5. The combination of claim 1 wherein said partial nozzle has another section within said bore of a smaller
diameter than said at least one section positioned adjacent said nozzle stub, said partial nozzle having a
flange in said bore where said another section and said at least one section of said partial nozzle meet

positioned in said bore in the vicinity of said shoulder said sealing material being positioned in said bore
compressed between said flange and said shoulder to provide said mechanical seal thereat.
6. The combination of claim 5 comprising another mechanical seal in said bore between said nozzle stub
and said another section of said partial nozzle.
7. The nozzle assembly of claim 1 wherein said partial nozzle comprises a nozzle body which includes
said at least one section, and a drive sleeve, said bore having a threaded section adjacent the exterior of
said vessel, said drive sleeve being threaded to said threaded section of said bore, said nozzle body
passing through said sleeve to the exterior of said vessel, at least a portion of said sleeve having said
same diameter, whereby said nozzle body is mechanically attached to said vessel and said sealing
material is compressed by said sleeve threaded and tightened in said bore.
8. The combination of a nozzle assembly and a pressure vessel of a nuclear power facility having a bore,
comprising:
a full nozzle extending from the interior of said vessel, through said bore and exiting said bore to the
exterior of said vessel;
a mechanical coupling of said full nozzle to said vessel operative to provide for a mechanical attachment
of said full nozzle to said vessel said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said full nozzle
and said vessel; and
a mechanical, non-welded seal of said full nozzle to said vessel.
9. The combination of claim 8 wherein said full nozzle has a tapered section within said bore which
increases in diameter away from the interior of said vessel, said bore correspondingly having a tapered
section which correspondingly increases in diameter away from the interior of said vessel, said tapered
section of said full nozzle engaging said tapered section of said bore directly or with sealing material
therebetween sufficient to provide said mechanical seal thereat.
10. The combination of claim 8 wherein said full nozzle, at least within said bore, is one-piece excluding
any sealing material.
11. The combination of claim 8 wherein said full nozzle comprises:
a nozzle body extending from the interior of said vessel, through said bore and exiting said bore to the
exterior of said vessel, and a drive sleeve sized to concentrically slidably fit on said nozzle body;
said mechanical coupling comprising exterior threads on said drive sleeve and interior threads in said
bore adjacent to the exterior of said vessel positioned to engage said threads on said drive sleeve to
attach said drive sleeve to said vessel, and an annular flange on said nozzle body in said bore engaged
by said drive sleeve.
12. The combination of claim 11 wherein said mechanical seal includes sealing material in said bore
compressed between said annular flange and an end of said sleeve adjacent thereto.

13. The combination of claim 8 wherein said full nozzle comprises a nozzle body extending from the
interior of said vessel through said bore and exiting said bore and a drive sleeve surrounding a portion of
said nozzle body in said bore adjacent the exterior of said vessel, said bore having a larger diameter
section adjacent the exterior of said vessel surrounding said drive sleeve and a smaller diameter section
adjacent the interior of said vessel surrounding said nozzle body and defining a shoulder therebetween,
said mechanical coupling comprising exterior threads on said drive sleeve in said bore and interior
threads in said larger diameter section of said bore positioned to engage said threads on said drive
sleeve to attach said drive sleeve to said vessel, and exterior threads on said nozzle body extending from
inside said drive sleeve to outside said drive sleeve and interior threads on said drive sleeve positioned to
engage said exterior threads on said nozzle body to attach said nozzle body to said drive sleeve, and a
nut threaded to said nozzle body outside said drive sleeve tightened against said drive sleeve, said
mechanical seal comprising sealing material positioned and compressed between an end of said drive
sleeve in said bore and said shoulder in said bore.
14. The combination of claim 8 comprising a sleeve positioned in said bore extending from the interior of
said vessel and terminating in said bore, said sleeve having a tubular OD and a section with a tapered ID
which increases in diameter away from the interior of said vessel, said full nozzle having a tapered
section within said sleeve corresponding to the taper of said sleeve tapered section, said mechanical seal
being formed by sealing contact of said tapered sections of said sleeve and said full nozzle.
15. The combination of claim 13 comprising another mechanical seal in said bore, said full nozzle
comprising a sleeve in said bore adjacent an end of said nozzle body in said bore interference fitted with
said bore to form said another mechanical seal thereat.
16. The combination of a nozzle assembly and an ASME pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a sleeve opening to the interior of said vessel and extending part way into said bore, said sleeve being
shrink fit to mechanically attach it to said vessel and mechanically seal it in the bore;
a nozzle extending from at least adjacent said sleeve in said bore, through said bore and exiting said bore
to the exterior of said vessel;
a mechanical coupling of said nozzle to said vessel operative to provide a mechanical attachment of said
nozzle to said vessel, said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said nozzle and said vessel;
and
a mechanical seal of said nozzle to said vessel.
17. The combination of claim 16 wherein said nozzle has a smaller diameter tubular section within said
bore positioned within said first sleeve and a larger diameter tubular section within said bore adjacent said
smaller diameter section which meet and define an annular flange thereat, said bore correspondingly
having a smaller diameter section surrounding said first sleeve and a larger diameter section adjacent
said smaller diameter section which meet and define an annular shoulder thereat, said mechanical seal
comprising sealing material positioned in said bore compressed under action at least of said annular
flange and said annular shoulder.

18. The combination of a nozzle assembly and an ASME pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a nozzle stub which opens to the interior of said vessel and extends therefrom part way into said bore,
said nozzle stub being welded to said vessel where said bore opens to the interior of said vessel;
a partial nozzle extending from the vicinity of said nozzle stub in said bore, through said bore and exiting
said bore to the exterior of said vessel;
a mechanical coupling of said partial nozzle to said vessel operative to provide a mechanical attachment
of said partial nozzle to said vessel, said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said partial
nozzle and said vessel and comprising bolts threaded to said vessel, a flange and a coupling of said bolts
to said flange and a coupling of said flange to said partial nozzle; and
a mechanical seal of said partial nozzle to said vessel.
19. The combination of claim 18 wherein said coupling of said flange to said nozzle comprises a sleeve
threaded to said partial nozzle which is coupled to said flange.
20. The combination of claim 18 wherein said seal of said nozzle to said vessel is in said bore, and
comprising another seal of said nozzle to said vessel including sealing material compressed between said
flange and the exterior of said vessel.
21. The combination of claim 20 wherein said partial nozzle has a smaller diameter tubular section within
said bore positioned adjacent said nozzle stub and a larger diameter tubular section within said bore
adjacent said smaller diameter section which meet and define an annular flange thereat, said bore
correspondingly having a smaller diameter section adjacent said nozzle stub and a larger diameter
section adjacent said smaller diameter section which meet and define an annular shoulder thereat, said
mechanical seal comprising sealing material positioned in said bore compressed under action at of said
annular flange and said annular shoulder.
22. The combination of claim 21 comprising another mechanical seal in said bore between said nozzle
stub and said partial nozzle.
23. The combination of claim 18 wherein said partial nozzle has a tubular section within said bore
adjacent said nozzle stub which has an inner diameter larger than the outer diameter of said nozzle stub
tubular section, said tubular section of said partial nozzle overlapping said tubular section of said nozzle
stub;
said bore having a smaller diameter section adjacent said nozzle stub tubular section and a larger
diameter section adjacent thereto surrounding said tubular section of said partial nozzle, said bore having
an annular shoulder where said smaller and larger diameter sections thereof meet;
said mechanical coupling comprising an end of said tubular section in said bore of said partial nozzle
compressively engaging said shoulder in said bore;

said mechanical seal between said nozzle stub and said partial nozzle comprising sealing material
surrounding said tubular section of said nozzle stub compressed between said bore shoulder and an end
of said tubular section of said partial nozzle.
24. The combination of claim 19 wherein said sleeve is threaded to said partial nozzle exteriorly of said
vessel extending beyond a side of said flange facing away from said vessel, said sleeve in a tightened
condition thereof engaging said flange and being coupled to said flange by a weld.
25. The combination of a nozzle assembly and a pressure vessel of a nuclear power facility having a
bore, comprising:
a full nozzle extending from the interior of said vessel, through said bore and exiting said bore to the
exterior of said vessel, a flange coupled to said full nozzle outside of said bore, said full nozzle and said
bore having structure which engages under compressive loading of said nozzle in said bore and bolts
attaching said flange to the exterior of said vessel and providing said compressive loading of said nozzle
in said bore; and
a mechanical seal, in said bore, of said full nozzle to said vessel.
26. The combination of claim 25 wherein said full nozzle has a tapered section within said bore which
increases in diameter away from the interior of said vessel, said bore correspondingly having a tapered
section which correspondingly increases in diameter away from the interior of said vessel, said tapered
section of said full nozzle sealing with said tapered section of said bore directly or with sealing material
compressed therebetween to provide said mechanical seal thereat.
27. The combination of claim 26 wherein said full nozzle, at least within said bore, is one-piece excluding
any sealing material.
28. The combination of claim 26 wherein said full nozzle comprises:
a nozzle body extending from the interior of said vessel, through said bore and exiting said bore to the
exterior of said vessel, said nozzle body including said tapered section of said full nozzle and a tubular
section positioned adjacent thereto on a side thereof away from the interior of said vessel, said nozzle
body having an annular flange where said tapered section and said tubular section meet; and
a sleeve sized to concentrically slidably fit on said tubular section of said nozzle body in engagement with
said annular flange;
said flange being coupled to said sleeve and providing said compressive loading to said nozzle through
said sleeve and said annular flange.
29. The combination of claim 25 wherein said flange is a split flange.
30. The combination of an initial installation, replacement or repair nozzle assembly and an ASME
pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a nozzle extending from and exiting said bore to the exterior of said vessel, said nozzle being attached to
said vessel;

a mechanical seal in said bore between said nozzle and said vessel; and
structure forming a leak path along which any liquid in said bore which leaks past said mechanical seal in
said bore can flow to the exterior of said vessel, said structure forming at least one passage having a
circumferential width of substantially less than 360 degrees through which leaking liquid can be
channeled.
31. The combination of claim 30 comprising a first mechanical seal and a second mechanical seal in said
bore between said nozzle and said vessel, said first mechanical seal being closer to said vessel interior
than said second mechanical seal, said leak path being provided from said second mechanical seal
extending to the exterior of said vessel.
32. The combination of claim 31 comprising another leak path form said first mechanical seal extending to
the exterior of said vessel.
33. The combination of claim 30 wherein said nozzle is a full nozzle mechanically attached to said vessel
extending from the interior to the exterior of said vessel.
34. The combination of clam 30 wherein said nozzle is a full nozzle welded to said vessel extending from
the interior to the exterior of said vessel.
35. The combination of claim 30 comprising means for mechanically attaching said nozzle to said vessel.
36. The combination of a nozzle assembly and a pressure vessel of a nuclear power facility having a
bore, comprising:
a nozzle extending from and exiting said bore to the exterior of said vessel;
a mechanical coupling of said nozzle to said vessel operative to provide for a mechanical attachment of
said nozzle to said vessel, said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said nozzle and said
vessel; and
an anti-rotation device coupled to at least one part of said nozzle and to said vessel without a weld to said
vessel to resist rotation of said at least one part in said bore.
37. The combination of claim 36 wherein said anti-rotation device comprises key stock engaging with said
at least one part and said vessel in said bore.
38. The combination of claim 36 wherein said anti-rotation device comprises a mechanical engagement of
said at least one part with another part welded to said nozzle.
39. The combination of a nozzle and an ASME pressure vessel having a bore, said nozzle being welded
to said vessel and passing through said bore, said bore having a diameter slightly larger than a diameter
of said nozzle adjacent the interior of said vessel and a diameter substantially larger than a diameter of
said nozzle adjacent the exterior of said vessel, said nozzle being welded to said vessel at the opening of
said bore to the vessel interior; said combination comprising:

a sleeve extending into said bore surrounding a substantial portion of said nozzle in said bore where the
diameter thereof is substantially larger than the diameter of said nozzle;
a mechanical coupling of said sleeve to said vessel and said mechanical coupling not including a weld;
a mechanical seal of said sleeve to said vessel within said bore surrounding said nozzle.
40. The combination of claim 39 wherein said mechanical seal of said sleeve to said vessel comprises an
annular shoulder where the larger and smaller diameter bore portions meet and compressed sealing
material between an end of said sleeve in said bore and said shoulder.
41. The combination of claim 39 wherein said mechanical seal of said sleeve to said vessel comprises a
taper in said bore transitioning between a larger diameter closer to the vessel exterior and a smaller
diameter closer to the vessel interior, a corresponding taper in said sleeve, and said mechanical
attachment of said sleeve to said vessel forcing the tapered portions of said bore and sleeve into sealing
engagement.
42. The combination of claim 39 wherein said mechanical attachment of said sleeve to said vessel
comprises exterior threads on sleeve and interior threads in said bore which engage.
43. The combination of claim 39 wherein said sleeve extends exteriorly of said vessel surrounding said
nozzle, a flange coupled to said sleeve exteriorly of said vessel, and bolts coupled to said flange attached
to the vessel exterior.
44. The combination of claim 43 comprising another mechanical seal between said flange and the vessel.
45. The combination of claim 40 wherein said sleeve extends exteriorly of said vessel surrounding said
nozzle, said nozzle extending from said sleeve, and comprising a weld between said nozzle and said
sleeve outside of said bore.
46. The combination of claim 45 comprising a tubular element, said weld attaching said nozzle to said
tubular element, and a mechanical coupling rotatably attaching said sleeve to said tubular element,
whereby said sleeve may be rotated in said bore while welded to said nozzle.
47. The combination of claim 39 wherein said sleeve extends exteriorly of said vessel surrounding said
nozzle, said nozzle extending from said sleeve, and a clamp frictionally engaging said nozzle and
attached to said sleeve.
48. The combination of claim 47 comprising bolts attached to the vessel exterior and a flange, said flange
being coupled to said bolts and to said clamp.
49. A method of mechanically attaching and mechanically sealing a nozzle welded to a pressure vessel of
a nuclear power facility which extends into a bore of the vessel and exteriorly of the vessel, comprising:
enlarging the diameter of the bore to be substantially larger than that of the nozzle for a portion thereof
adjacent the exterior of the vessel;

mechanically attaching a sleeve to the vessel which extends into the bore surrounding a substantial
portion of the nozzle in the enlarged bore; and
mechanically sealing the sleeve within the bore surrounding the existing nozzle.
50. The method of claim 49 wherein the step of mechanically sealing the sleeve comprises forming an
annular shoulder where the enlarged and existing bore portions meet, positioning sealing material
between the end of the sleeve in the bore and the shoulder, and compressing the sealing material
therebetween.
51. The method of claim 50 wherein the step of mechanically sealing the sleeve comprises forming a
taper in the bore transitioning between a larger diameter closer to the vessel exterior and a smaller
diameter closer to the vessel interior, forming a corresponding taper in the sleeve, and forcing the tapered
portions of the bore and sleeve into sealing engagement compressing any sealing material therebetween.
52. The method of claim 50 wherein the step of mechanically attaching the sleeve to the vessel comprises
threading the sleeve in the bore.
53. The method of claim 50 wherein the sleeve extends exteriorly of the vessel surrounding the nozzle,
and wherein the step of mechanically attaching the sleeve to the vessel comprises coupling a flange to
the vessel with bolts threaded to the vessel and coupling the flange to the sleeve exteriorly of the vessel.
54. The method of claim 53 comprising the step of mechanically sealing the flange to the vessel.
55. The method of claim 53 wherein the sleeve extends exteriorly of the vessel surrounding the nozzle,
and comprising the step of welding the existing nozzle to the sleeve outside of the bore.
56. The method of claim 55 wherein the step of mechanically attaching the sleeve to the vessel comprises
threading the sleeve in the bore, and wherein the step of welding the sleeve to the existing nozzle
comprises welding the sleeve to an element which is rotatably coupled to the sleeve, whereby the sleeve
may be rotated in the bore while welded to the existing nozzle.
57. A method of partially replacing an existing nozzle in a pressure vessel of a nuclear power facility which
is welded to the vessel where the bore opens to the interior of the vessel, comprising:
removing a portion of the existing nozzle adjacent the exterior of the vessel and leaving a nozzle stub
welded to the vessel where the bore opens to the interior of the vessel and extending part way into the
bore;
mechanically attaching a partial nozzle to the vessel extending from adjacent said nozzle stub in the bore,
through the bore and exiting the bore to the exterior of the vessel; and
mechanically sealing the partial nozzle to the vessel solely within the bore.
58. The combination of an initial installation, replacement or repair nozzle assembly and an ASME
pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:

a nozzle extending from and exiting said bore to the exterior of said vessel, said nozzle being welded to
said vessel; and
means for mechanically sealing said nozzle including sealing material compressed within said bore such
that said sealing material may be further compressed to tighten said mechanical seal without breaking
said weld.
59. The combination of claim 58 wherein said means for sealing provides two mechanical seals of said
nozzle to said vessel and comprising means for independently compressively said seals.
60. The nozzle assembly of claim 58 wherein said means for sealing live-loads said seal.
61. The combination of an initial installation, replacement or repair nozzle assembly and an ASME
pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a nozzle stub which opens to the interior of said vessel and extends therefrom part way into said bore,
said nozzle stub being welded to said vessel where said bore opens to the interior of said vessel, and a
partial nozzle extending from adjacent said nozzle stub in said bore, through said bore and exiting said
bore to the exterior of said vessel, said partial nozzle being attached to said vessel;
a mechanical seal in said bore between said partial nozzle and said vessel; and
structure forming a leak path along which any liquid in said bore which leaks past said mechanical seal in
said bore can flow to the exterior of said vessel.
62. The combination of a nozzle assembly and an ASME pressure vessel having a bore, comprising:
a nozzle which opens to the interior of said vessel and extends therefrom in said bore, through said bore
and exits said bore to the exterior of said vessel;
a mechanical coupling of said nozzle to said vessel operative to provide for a mechanical attachment of
said nozzle to said vessel, said mechanical coupling not including a weld between said nozzle and said
vessel, said mechanical coupling comprising bolts threaded to said vessel and a flange, and including a
coupling of said bolts to said flange and a coupling of said flange to said nozzle; and
a mechanical, non-welded seal of said nozzle to said vessel.
63. The combination of claim 62 wherein said coupling of said flange to said nozzle is operative to
compressively load said nozzle to said vessel.
64. The combination of claim 8 wherein said coupling of said flange to said full nozzle is operative to
compressively load said full nozzle to said vessel.
65. The combination of an initial installation, replacement or repair nozzle assembly and an ASME
pressure vessel having a bore and adapted to contain a corrosive liquid therein without corroding the
interior of said vessel, comprising:
a nozzle extending from and exiting said bore to the exterior of said vessel, said nozzle being attached to
said vessel;

a mechanical seal in said bore between said nozzle and said vessel; and
structure forming a leak path along which any liquid in said bore which leaks past said mechanical seal in
said bore can flow to the exterior of said vessel, said structure forming said leak path which comes into
contact with any liquid flowing in said leak path being resistant to corrosion by the corrosive liquid which
said vessel is adapted to contain.

DESCRIPTION
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/239,177 filed May 6, 1994, (now U.S.
Pat. No. 5,605,361) titled "REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES FOR PRESSURE VESSELS AND METHOD
OF ATTACHING SAME". The entire contents and disclosure of application Ser. No. 08/239,177 (referred
to below as "the prior application") are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention disclosed herein relates to nozzles, nozzle assemblies, and nozzle repair assemblies for
vessels and piping that are installed either initially or as replacements without any welding at all to the
vessel. (A "nozzle" may be, or include as part thereof, a sleeve and/or, piping. A "vessel" may also be
large bore piping.) The invention more particularly relates to nozzles, nozzle assemblies, nozzle repair
assemblies and procedures which replace or repair nozzles that are attached to the vessel on the inside
diameter of the vessel with a J groove structural weld. (The term "nozzle assembly" is sometimes
interchangeably used herein with the term "partial nozzle assembly" which encompasses an assembly
that includes part of an existing nozzle and a partial replacement nozzle or the term "full nozzle assembly"
which encompasses an assembly that includes a full replacement nozzle. Both partial and full nozzle
assemblies in addition may include components such as gaskets, packing glands, a spring, and antirotation and leak path devices etc. These assemblies provide a mechanical attachment of a nozzle to a
vessel, a mechanical seal of a nozzle, or both. The term "nozzle repair assembly" encompasses an
existing nozzle and a structure which mechanically seals the existing nozzle or attaches the existing
nozzle to the vessel without welding to the vessel, or both.) The invention has particular application to
nozzles, nozzle assemblies, nozzle repair assemblies and procedures which replace, repair or initially
install nozzles in ASME pressure vessels and large bore piping of pressurized water reactor (PWR)
nuclear power facilities, either because a nozzle has failed, or to prevent future failure or leakage due to a
phenomenon known as Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking, PWSCC. Repair of a nozzle also
encompasses plugging the bore, for example, replacing a heater with a plug. Further, the invention relates
to replacement and repair of nozzles and assemblies that were previously replaced or repaired.
A typical PWR nuclear power generating facility includes in part a reactor vessel, steam generator,
pressurizer vessel, and a reactor coolant piping system, all of which operate under high pressure.
Nozzles are attached to the vessels and/or piping for a number of purposes, e.g., for connecting piping
and instrumentation, vents, and to secure control element drive mechanisms and heater elements. A
typical pressurizer vessel 20 is shown in FIG. 1 with nozzles 22 for vents, nozzles 24 for sample or liquid

level, nozzles 25 (one of which is shown behind nozzle 24) for pressure sensing, a nozzle 26 for
temperature measuring, and a number of nozzles 27 for heating elements. All of those nozzles were
heretofore welded to the pressurizer vessel at the time of original manufacture.
As shown in FIG. 2, inconel or stainless cladding 29 is welded to the interior of the pressurizer vessel
which is made of carbon steel. The nozzle 26 shown in 5 cross section in FIG. 2, which is exemplary of
the welded nozzles 22 and 24-27, passes through a hole or bore 30 in the pressurizer vessel 20 and is
structurally welded at its interior end 32 to the vessel 20 with a J-groove weld 34 along the interior
opening to the bore 30. The diameter of nozzle 32 is slightly less than the diameter of bore 30, so that
there is a small annular space 36 between the nozzle exterior and the wall of bore 30. In some
applications the nozzles are fit tight to the bore, and in a control rod drive mechanism, they are installed
with a shrink fit process. The J-groove weld 34 also functions as a seal weld to seal the annular space 36.
A reactor vessel (not shown) similarly has nozzles represented by nozzle 26 in FIG. 2 welded thereto. The
piping of the reactor coolant system (not shown) also includes similar nozzles welded thereto. Further
details of pressurizer vessels, reactor vessels, and coolant system piping, in particular, and nuclear power
facilities, in general, are known to those of skill in the art.
As mentioned, the invention has particular application to the replacement of nozzles which have failed,
and to the prevention of nozzle failures and leakage in nuclear power facilities due to the PWSCC
phenomenon, which occurs on components having a susceptible material, high tensile stresses, high
temperature and which are in a corrosive environment, conditions which primarily exist on nozzle
penetrations in the pressurizer vessel, reactor coolant piping, and the reactor vessel. Such failures are
manifested by cracking, which the applicant recognized resulted from several contributing factors. Such
cracking occurs at the grain boundaries on the inside diameter of the nozzle material (Alloy 600) at or
near the heat affected zone of the weld and propagates radially outward through the thickness of the
nozzle which eventually leads to small leakage of the reactor coolant supply. Recently, failures have also
occurred on stainless steel pressurizer nozzles though the failure mechanism is not known.
As indicated, nozzles of these types have failed over time and have had to be replaced or repaired, either
because of a failure in the nozzle or the weld attaching and sealing the nozzle to the vessel. A typical
replacement procedure in a nuclear power plant environment requires shutting down the nuclear power
plant, removing the nozzle, which typically requires machining operations, and welding a replacement
nozzle to the vessel or piping. The welded replacement nozzles currently in use closely duplicate the
original welded nozzle they replace, except that they may be made of a different alloy, e.g., Alloy 690
(less susceptible to PWSCC) instead of Alloy 600, and may also be represented by the nozzle shown in
FIG. 2. Other weld repair methods involve installing a thick weld pad on the outside of the vessel and
structurally welding the nozzle to the pad, and seal welding the interior end of the nozzle to the vessel.
Other refinements to this method involve inserting a thin sleeve between the nozzle and vessel, seal
welding the thin sleeve on the inside diameter of the vessel, and structurally welding the thin sleeve and
nozzle on the outside of the vessel. This methodology promotes less weld residual stress and eliminates

the axial thermal stresses imposed since the nozzle is now free ended and allowed to grow thermally
when the vessel heats up. Still another derivative of the weld pad designs is the use of a partial nozzle
instead of a full nozzle. With this approach, only a portion of the nozzle is removed leaving the cracked
portion of the nozzle remaining in place. A partial nozzle is structurally welded to the weld pad leaving
approximately a 1/16" to 1/8" gap between the existing and new nozzle. A final derivative of the weld pad
is replacing a portion of the existing heater nozzle, otherwise known as a heater sleeve, with a plug
instead of a partial nozzle or sleeve, which is used due to the inherent difficulties of aligning the
replacement nozzle such that the heaters can be reinstalled. Therefore, the failed heater location is
abandoned in place with the plug preventing further leakage. Also, a heater sleeve may be plugged
because a replacement for the failed heater is not available during the repair period, typically a scheduled
outage. The heater will then be replaced during next scheduled outage.
The above partial nozzle replacement and plugs are normally used as last resorts since the carbon steel
vessel is exposed to reactor coolant containing boric acid which can corrode the vessel and since the
failed nozzle can continue to crack with the crack propagating into the base material of the vessel. Boric
acid corrosion, though a concern, has not proven to corrode the vessel bore to any sufficient depth for at
least one nozzle installed in the steam space in the pressurizer, which is in a low oxygen, stagnant
environment. However, corrosion could be a concern for those areas with high fluid flow such as nozzles
on reactor coolant piping.
Another method of plugging a heater location, though currently not used in the industry, involves removing
a portion of the existing nozzle, inserting a new nozzle with split flared ends that compress during
insertion and expand once the nozzle is fully inserted such that the flared ends overlap the inboard end of
the existing nozzle relying on the integrity of the existing nozzle and weld to prevent ejection of the
replaced nozzle. Once the split flared nozzle is installed, a portion of the nozzle is then rolled with high
compressive load expanding the rolled area into the vessel bore, thereby forming a seal therebetween.
After the rolled joint is formed a steel rod is inserted through the nozzle past the split flared ends, which
prevents them from compressing inward, and a seal weld is applied at the outside diameter of the vessel
at the nozzle and rod interface. The inherent problem with this plug is the rolled joint. The rolling process
causes a compressive stress layer in the joint itself, but at the interface between the rolled and non rolled
area, high tensile stresses are imposed which promote cracking. Cracking has been observed in the
rolled transition region on similar repairs used for steam generator A600 tubes. Though this method uses
A690 as the replacement material, A690 is not believed to be immune from PWSCC. Furthermore, the
rolled joint may not be reliable to form a seal for extended periods because of relaxation over time in the
rolled area. Any leakage here would cause severe corrosion to the outside of the vessel because as the
reactor coolant leaks to the atmosphere, it flashes to steam and is in a highly oxygenated environment.
Replacements employing the above-described procedures in a nuclear power plant currently require a
minimum of approximately fourteen days for some types of nozzles (although some claim a minimum of
seven to ten days), and are extremely expensive. Including the lost revenue resulting from plant shut-

down, which may be as high as $750,000 per day, the total cost of each repair can result in several
millions dollars if the repair has to be performed in a non-scheduled facility shut down.
The above-described nozzle replacement and repair procedures and any other replacement and repair
procedure that requires welding to the vessel not only is time consuming and therefore expensive, but
also exposes repair personnel to more radiation than the replacement and repair procedures disclosed
herein, particularly where the nozzle replacement or repair procedure involves personnel entering inside
the vessel to perform the procedure. Also, both the original welded nozzle and the known welded
replacement nozzles and methods subject the welded nozzle to high residual stresses imposed by weld
shrinkage. These high residual stresses increase the susceptibility to PWSCC. Thus, the welded
replacement nozzle offers no improvement over the original nozzle in terms of expected life and reduction
of failures, other than any improvement that may result from use of a superior nozzle material. Although,
Alloy 690 material is less susceptible to PWSCC than Alloy 600, it is not known that the change in nozzle
material alone will not eliminate the possibility of nozzle failures. At least three utilities have replaced
nozzles using the original design criteria, Alloy 690 material for the nozzle, and alloy 600 weld material,
and have experienced failures in the weld material itself Based on this information, improved nozzle
replacement and repair methods are needed.
There now appears to be some recognition in the field that replacement and/or repair of nozzles in
pressure vessels of nuclear power plants may proceed without structurally welding a replacement nozzle
to the vessel. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,149,490 and 5,202,082 (both of Brown et al.) and U.S. Pat.
No. 5,404,382 (Russ et al.) (see FIGS. 8 and 9) describe methods and apparatus for replacing a nozzle
for a pressurizer vessel without structurally welding the nozzle to the vessel. Although the replacement
nozzles of the '490 and '382 patents are mechanically attached to the pressurizer vessel, according to
these patents welding is still required to provide the seal between the nozzle and the pressurizer vessel.
Therefore, the residual stresses discussed above are imposed on the nozzle by the weld whether it be a
structural weld or a seal weld, which imposes less stress than a structural weld. The '382 patent discloses
with respect to FIGS. 8 and 9 that the weld seams are free from loading because the nozzle is
prestressed in a such a way that axial and horizontal forces acting on the nozzle are compensated for.
Here, as understood by the applicant, the purpose of the prestressing is to compress the tapered nozzle
against the vessel bore to eliminate lateral movement of the nozzle and bending at the weld location. It
appears that the replacement procedure disclosed in the '382 patent can only be used in those locations
where the inside of the vessel can be accessed such as the reactor head. This method cannot be used in
the heater locations and most likely could not be used in the reactor coolant piping (typically 28" piping
located in a confined area, with a high dose rate that can not be easily shielded).
In the replacement procedure and nozzle described in the '082 patent, the original welded nozzle is not
fully removed, and a mechanical seal is made between the remaining cracked nozzle portion and the end
of the replacement nozzle. Leaving part of the existing nozzle at the interior welded may lead to future
cracking in the existing failed portion of the Alloy 600 nozzle that was not removed from the vessel.

However, further cracking in the base material of the vessel would not likely result in reactor coolant
leakage. Experience and analysis indicate that the base material of the vessel will only crack some
minimum distance into the base material which will not jeopardize the integrity of the vessel. Boric acid
corrosion for this design is less of a concern than the partial nozzle welded design discussed above due
to the fact that there is not an exposed gap between the new and existing nozzle thereby limiting or
eliminating boric acid from contacting the vessel. Partial nozzle designs not having sealing capabilities
between the new and existing nozzle can be justified readily where the nozzles are located in stagnant
region of the pressurizer vessel, e.g. the liquid space or the upper steam space because there is a limited
amount of bore cavity available for the stagnant boric acid to collect and oxidize between fuel cycles and
because the reactant coolant has a low oxygen content. Further, if corrosion does occur, a protective
oxidation layer will form which resists further corrosion in the stagnant environment. Therefore, partial
nozzle replacements without a seal between the existing nozzle and the partial replacement nozzle
appear to be justified for the life of the plant. For those locations in which the partial nozzle replacement
without the seal is not in a stagnant environment, i.e., reactor coolant piping, additional evaluations are
required to justify extended usage. Partial nozzle designs with the seal between the existing nozzle and
the partial replacement nozzle can be used in stagnant environment locations and at high fluid flow
locations; however, a better design practice would be to remove the cracked nozzle to eliminate further
degradation of the vessel. The procedure described in the '082 patent thus has the drawback that a
portion of the failed nozzle remains structurally welded to the vessel and therefore continues to subject
the vessel to the same stresses as the original nozzle, although, as mentioned above, there now appears
to be justification for employing partial nozzle replacements. In any event, the remaining nozzle portion
and the vessel portion surrounding the bore opening are subject to further degradation.
As far as the applicant is aware, the replacement nozzles and replacement procedures disclosed in the
'490 and '082 patents have not been used in a nuclear power facility anywhere, and the replacement
nozzles and nozzle replacement procedures disclosed in FIGS. 8 and 9 of the '382 patent have not been
used in a nuclear power facility in the United States.
A repair procedure has also been developed which does not use welded replacements and plugs. This
repair procedure involves leaving the existing nozzle installed, installing a split flange exterior to the
vessel, applying a split seal at the outside diameter of the vessel and nozzle interface, and providing an
unloaded anti-ejection device. In the event the existing nozzle were to crack due to PWSCC, the seal at
the outside of the vessel is intended to prevent reactor coolant leakage. This repair procedure is intended
as a preventative leakage measure as opposed to an ASME code section XI type of repair or
replacement. Nuclear Regulatory approval may be required before this repair procedure could be used.
However, it has already been installed at one utility as a preventive measure. This methodology does not
prevent PWSCC from occurring. However, without further evaluation it is unknown by the applicant if the
repair is acceptable for the life of the plant. It is possible that if the nozzle began to crack at numerous
locations, the crack could propagate axially from the J-groove weld to beyond the seal incorporated at the

flange. However, if this occurred it would not be a significant safety concern but would require additional
repairs.
The following U.S. patents relate to installing, replacing, repairing or sealing nozzles, sleeves, tubes or
plugs in pressure vessels and piping: U.S. Pat. No. 2,711,841 (Schaefer et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,255,840
(Loch et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,440,339 (Tamai et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,480,841 (Schukei et al.); U.S. Pat.
No. 4,615,477 (Spada et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,653,483 (Margotta); U.S. Pat. No. 4,723,795 (Shenoy); U.S.
Pat. No. 4,826,217 (Guerrero); U.S. Pat. No. 5,091,140 (Dixon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,801 (Dixon et
al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,196,160 (Porowski); U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,895 (Wivagg); U.S. Pat. No. 5,271,048
(Behake et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,274,683 (Broda et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,878 (Porowski); U.S. Pat. No.
5,297,187 (Sodergren et al.) U.S. Pat. No. 5,323,428 (Porter et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,768
(Weems).
Also a method similar to that used in steam generator tube repairs has been proposed with certain
modifications to the Nuclear Regulatory Committee for repairing a leaking nozzle. According to the
proposal, the existing nozzle is rolled and deformed against the ID of the vessel such that a seal is
created between the nozzle and vessel. (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,768 (Weems), cited above). Also, an
optional A690 sleeve could be rolled into the existing nozzle forming a seal therebetween. A similar design
was also proposed for a plug. However, the Nuclear Regulatory Committee declined the proposals
because that rolling technique causes high tensile stresses at the rolled transition region which promotes
PWSCC, and because that repair method may be only leak limiting which could allow the boric acid in the
reactor coolant to erode a portion of the carbon steel vessel.
Nozzles are currently being replaced or repaired in PWR nuclear power facilities both because they have
failed and as a preventive measure where a statistical analysis has indicated a high probability of a future
failure. Nozzle failures and such statistically indicated failures have been occurring frequently enough to
be a major concern for nuclear power plant operators (and owners) for a number of reasons including the
high cost of repairs and the millions of dollars in lost revenue due to plant shut down. Therefore, there is a
need for procedures for replacing and repairing nozzles that have failed or may fail or leak in the future,
that (a) reduce the time and expense required to make the replacement or repair and (b) do not require
confined entry into a pressure vessel, which reduce radiation exposure to the personnel performing the
replacement or repair, and (c) reduce the susceptibility to PWSCC and do not result in further degradation
of the vessel, and accordingly reduce the risk of future failures and leaks. A similar need also exists for a
nozzle for initial installation applications and a method of initially installing such a nozzle in a vessel.
The invention disclosed herein addresses the above-described needs and avoids the problems discussed
above, and provides original nozzles and nozzle assemblies, replacement nozzles and nozzle
assemblies, nozzle repair assemblies and procedures for installing and repairing nozzles and nozzle
assemblies mechanically in pressure vessels in nuclear power facilities (and in other fields) that avoid
some or all of the problems discussed above, and which do not employ a structural weld or a weld of any
kind to the vessel.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION


It is an object of the invention disclosed herein to reduce the susceptibility to PWSCC of replacement
nozzles and initial installation nozzles in nuclear power facilities as much as reasonably achievable, and
thereby reduce the possibility of future nozzle failures.
It is another object of the invention to reduce the time and expense involved with installing a replacement
or initial installation nozzle, or repairing an existing nozzle in a vessel, particularly in a nuclear power
facility.
It is another object of the invention to not require confined entry into a vessel in order to install a
replacement or initial installation nozzle in the vessel, or to repair an existing nozzle, particularly in a
nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention to reduce the exposure to radiation of repair personnel in a nuclear
power facility while installing a replacement or initial nozzle installation, or repairing an existing nozzle in a
vessel.
It is another object of the invention to install a replacement or initial installation nozzle in a vessel, or
repair an existing nozzle without structurally welding the nozzle to the vessel, particularly in a nuclear
power facility.
It is another object of the invention to install a replacement or initial installation nozzle in a vessel without
any welding at all, particularly in a nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention to repair an existing nozzle without any welding at all, or at least
without welding the existing nozzle to the vessel, particularly in a nuclear power facility.
It is another object of the invention when replacing a nozzle in a vessel to remove the entire existing
nozzle and to install a complete (whole) mechanical nozzle replacement, thereby removing the defective
(or possibly defective) portion of the existing nozzle and avoiding further degradation to the vessel.
It is another object of the invention when partially replacing a nozzle in a vessel to not remove the part of
the existing nozzle adjacent the interior of the vessel, i.e., to only remove the part of the existing nozzle
from a point beyond the J-groove weld to the exterior of the vessel, and to install a partial mechanical
nozzle replacement which is sealed to the bore adjacent the remaining nozzle portion, thereby simplifying
removal of the existing nozzle.
It is another object of the invention when repairing an existing nozzle to not remove the nozzle at all, but
to either provide a mechanical seal for the existing nozzle, or attach the existing nozzle to the vessel
without welding the existing nozzle to the vessel, or both.

It is another object of the invention provide a mechanical attachment and/or a mechanical seal in the
repair an existing nozzle without employing a weld of any kind, or optionally, a weld that is not made to
the vessel, e.g., a weld of the existing nozzle to a clamp or flange device located outside of the vessel.
It is another object of the invention to provide nozzles, nozzle assemblies and nozzle repair assemblies
which may be installed in vessels while achieving the objects set forth above.
It is another object of the invention to apply the techniques described herein and in the prior application
for full nozzle replacement to partial nozzle replacement and nozzle repair, and to apply the techniques
described herein for partial nozzle replacement to full nozzle replacement and nozzle repair.
It is another object of the invention to provide a primary and a secondary seal for applicable replacement
and repair assemblies to prevent leakage if the primary seal leaks.
It is another object of the invention to provide a primary corrosion resistant leak path in replacement and
repair assemblies so that in the event the primary and secondary seals leak, corrosion of the vessel
would not occur.
It is another object of the invention to provide a secondary corrosion resistant leak path in replacement
and repair assemblies in the event the primary and secondary seals leak and the primary leak path seals
failed, so that corrosion of the vessel would not occur.
It is another object of the invention to provide a leak path or paths which provide a visual indication of any
leakage in the leak path.
It is another object of the invention to provide a means to prevent nozzle rotation in replacement and
repair assemblies for those parts which may have high torsional loads.
It is another object of the invention to live load the mechanical seals provided by the invention such that
seal shrinkage over time will not cause leakage.
The applicant recognized that the effect of high tensile stresses in nozzles introduced by welds that
structurally attach and/or seal the nozzle to the vessel and the corrosive effect of coolant within the vessel
can be limited by mechanical designs, which are disclosed herein and in the prior application.
The invention(s) disclosed herein and in the prior application achieve the above and other objects by
providing full and partial nozzle replacements and full and partial nozzle replacement assemblies for
vessels, and repairs for existing nozzles, all of which are mechanically attached to the vessel and
mechanically sealed to the vessel, i.e., without any welding at all to the vessel. The invention(s) also
provide nozzle replacement and repair procedures for mechanically attaching and mechanically sealing
existing nozzles, the full and partial nozzles and nozzle assemblies to the vessel, and for repairing

nozzles, also without any welding to the vessel. The replacement and repair techniques, features and
arrangements disclosed herein are also applicable to initial nozzle installation. Therefore, "replacement"
should be understood to encompass initial installation where applicable. Most embodiments of the
invention do not use any weld at all, although some may weld the nozzle to a sleeve or flange that is
mechanically attached to the vessel.
The full and partial replacement nozzles and replacement and repair assemblies are flanged, clamped, or
bolted or compressively loaded to the vessel, and in some embodiments a part of the replacement nozzle
is attached to the vessel with an interference fit. In all embodiments a mechanical seal is obtained using
the interference fit between metal surfaces of a part of the nozzle and the vessel (which surfaces may be
polished), and/or by use of sealing materials. In most embodiments, the seals are live-loaded to selfcompensate for changes in the sealing material after initial installation. Also, in most embodiments, the
parts of a nozzle assembly adjustably compressively load the sealing material, so that a part or parts may
be tightened after initial installation to compensate for shrinkage of the sealing material. In the case of
replacement of an existing nozzle, a part or the entire existing nozzle is removed and a partial or full
nozzle or nozzle assembly is mechanically attached and mechanically sealed to the vessel. In the case of
repair, the existing nozzle within the bore is not removed, and a mechanical seal is provided for the
existing nozzle, and the existing nozzle may also be attached to the vessel without welding it to the
vessel. For use in booth replacement and repair, means are also provided to attach the nozzle to the
vessel without any welding at all via a clamping arrangement engaged at the nozzle and a drive sleeve.
The invention departs significantly from the prior art of nozzle replacement and initial installation by not
utilizing a weld of any kind, which eliminates the stresses imposed by welding and significantly reduces
the risk of a PWSCC type failure, or by not utilizing any weld at all.
The invention(s) disclosed herein further provide a corrosion resistant leak path or paths past the nozzle
or nozzle assembly to the exterior of the vessel should the mechanical seals leak for any reason. The
leak path or paths channel any reactor coolant leakage which may occur through a corrosion resistant
path out past the exterior surface of the vessel and beyond the insulation surrounding the vessel to the
oxygenated environment where the coolant can flash steam without eroding the vessel. Preferably, any
leakage in a leak path or leak paths is visible.
Further, the invention(s) disclosed herein provide an anti-rotation device or devices which prevent a
mechanically attached nozzle part from rotating relative to the vessel.
Still Further, the invention(s) disclosed herein provide a repair assembly which rotatably couples a sleeve
threaded to the bore and a nozzle or nozzle body so that the sleeve may be tightened without breaking a
weld between the nozzle and the assembly which attaches the nozzle to the sleeve. This technique
allows the sleeve to be torqued to tighten a mechanical seal without having to break the weld.
According to one embodiment of the invention, an existing nozzle in a bore of an ASME pressure vessel
is partially replaced by a replacement nozzle or replacement nozzle assembly, which comprises a nozzle

stub opening to the interior of the vessel and extending part way into the bore and a partial replacement
nozzle or nozzle assembly extending therefrom or spaced therefrom to the exterior of the vessel. The
nozzle stub is part of a previously installed nozzle which the nozzle or nozzle assembly is replacing, and
is welded to the vessel where the bore opens to the interior of the vessel. The replacement nozzle or
nozzle assembly also includes the partial replacement nozzle or assembly extending from adjacent the
nozzle stub in the bore, through the bore and exiting the bore to the exterior of the vessel, which is
mechanically attached to the vessel, and one or more mechanical seals of the partial replacement nozzle
or assembly to the vessel. In some embodiments, a mechanical seal is independent of the existing nozzle
stub, and in others cooperates with the nozzle stub to form the mechanical seal.
According to another embodiment of the invention, an existing nozzle in a bore of an ASME pressure
vessel is entirely removed and replaced by a full replacement nozzle or replacement nozzle assembly
extending from the interior of the vessel, through the bore and exiting the bore to the exterior of the
vessel. The full replacement nozzle or assembly is mechanically attached to vessel, and a mechanical
seal is made of the full nozzle or assembly to the vessel when the full nozzle or assembly is mechanically
attached to the vessel.
In the repair embodiments, the existing nozzle remains welded to the vessel at the opening of the bore
extending out of the vessel. A repair assembly is provided comprising a sleeve mechanically attached to
the vessel, e.g., by threading the sleeve to the bore or by a flange bolted to the vessel, with the sleeve
extending into the bore surrounding a substantial portion of the nozzle in the bore. A mechanical seal of
the sleeve to the vessel within the bore is made surrounding the existing nozzle.
If PWSCC were to occur after making a repair as described herein, a portion or all of the existing nozzle
may be removed and a partial or full nozzle replacement made as described herein. The adaptation of the
bore is the same as in the applicable partial or full nozzle replacement, except that part or all the existing
nozzle is removed and a full or partial nozzle is installed.
In the partial and full replacement nozzles and assemblies, and also in the repair assemblies, the
mechanical seal or seals may be entirely within the bore or only at the vessel exterior surrounding the
bore, or both.
Various mechanical arrangements are disclosed for mechanically attaching partial and full replacement
nozzles and assemblies and repair assemblies to the vessel. The nozzle may be one-piece or an
assembly including a nozzle body and another part such as a sleeve or flange for mechanically attaching
the nozzle body to the vessel. In one embodiment, the nozzle or nozzle assembly or repair assembly may
include a sleeve which has exterior threads that engage interior threads in the bore to bolt the nozzle or
assembly to the vessel, or the nozzle or assembly may be configured to engage structure in the bore
when the nozzle or assembly is tightened in the bore to mechanically compressively load the nozzle or
assembly to the vessel. The engaging structure may be interfering sections of the bore and a nozzle part,
e.g., tapered sections of a nozzle part and the bore or a tapered sleeve inserted in the bore, or a flanged

nozzle part and a shoulder in the bore, or a flange engaged with or attached to a nozzle body exteriorly of
the vessel and bolted to the vessel.
In another embodiment, a clamp arrangement frictionally engages the nozzle and a drive sleeve to
mechanically attach the nozzle to the vessel without welding.
The mechanical seal may be provided by sealing material, e.g., gasket material or packing material,
glands or rings compressed between interfering surfaces of the nozzle or nozzle assembly and the bore
or vessel exterior. For example, sealing material may be compressed between tapered surfaces, flanges
and shoulders in the bore and an external flange and the vessel exterior, to name a few. Alternatively, a
mechanical seal may be provided between contacting surfaces such as are compressively loaded
together when the nozzle or nozzle assembly is attached to the vessel or via a shrink fit. Again, the seals
may be live-loaded and also the compression thereof may be adjusted.
In partial nozzle replacement embodiments where the nozzle stub remains in the bore and repair
embodiments where the entire nozzle remains in the bore, the bore may be enlarged around the existing
nozzle and a nozzle, nozzle body or sleeve overlapping the existing nozzle, with sealing material
positioned around the existing nozzle compressed by the end of the nozzle, nozzle body or sleeve. This
embodiment does not axially load the existing nozzle.
This application discloses additional embodiments of full nozzle replacements, and also discloses
embodiments of partial nozzle replacements and existing nozzle repairs. The features and principles
disclosed herein and in the prior application may be utilized for full nozzle replacement, partial nozzle
replacement and nozzle repair. Thus, it will be apparent to those of skill in the technical field to which this
application relates that such features and principles disclosed in connection with one embodiment may be
applied to other embodiments.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary
and not limiting, in which like numerals refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:
FIG. 1 is an elevation view, partially in vertical section, of a conventional pressurizer vessel in a typical
nuclear power generating plant
FIG. 2 is a section view of one of the conventional nozzles attached to the vessel depicted in FIG. 1 taken
along line 2--2 in FIG. 1;
FIGS. 3-7 are section views similar to that of FIG. 2 of embodiments of full replacement nozzles or full
nozzle replacement assemblies and part of the vessel depicted in FIG. 1, identical to FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10
and 12, respectively, of the prior application;

FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 10A, 11 and 12 are section views similar to that of FIG. 4, but depicting embodiments of
partial nozzle replacement assemblies in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which
incorporate a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 4;
FIG. 13 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 3 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 3 and an anti-rotation device;
FIG. 14 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 9 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates features from the embodiments of FIGS. 3 and 13;
FIG. 15 is section view similar to that of FIG. 14 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or feature of the embodiment of FIG. 14 and clamps the replacement nozzle to the
vessel to form a seal at the cladding on the interior of the vessel;
FIG. 16 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 3 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly which
incorporates a feature or features from the embodiments of FIGS. 3, 7 and 15;
FIG. 17 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 14 depicting a full nozzle replacement assembly
incorporating a feature or features of the embodiment of FIG. 14 and leak paths, and an anti-rotation
device;
FIG. 18 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 17 depicting a partial nozzle replacement assembly in
which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a feature or features from the
embodiments of FIGS. 9 and 17 with another embodiment of an anti-rotation device;
FIG. 19 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 18 depicting another embodiment of a partial nozzle
replacement assembly in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a
feature or features of the embodiments of FIGS. 5 and 18;
FIG. 20 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 18 depicting still another embodiment of a partial nozzle
replacement assembly in which part of the original nozzle is not removed and which incorporates a
feature or features of the embodiments of FIGS. 5 and 18;
FIG. 21 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 9 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 9;
FIG. 22 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 18 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 18;
FIG. 23 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 19 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 19;

FIG. 24 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 20 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates a feature or features of FIG. 20;
FIG. 25 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 24 depicting a repair assembly for an existing nozzle which
incorporates the features of FIG. 24 and allows the repair to be installed without cutting the existing
nozzle;
FIG. 26 is a sectional view similar to that of FIG. 22 depicting an assembly for a nozzle which
incorporates the features of FIG. 22 including the option of welding the nozzle to a drive sleeve but which
permits the drive sleeve to be adjusted relative to the vessel to tighten a mechanical seal after the repair
assembly has been in service; and
FIG. 27 is a section view similar to that of FIG. 26 depicting an assembly for a nozzle which incorporates
a feature or features of FIGS. 25 and 26, allows installation without cutting the nozzle and without
employing a weld as in FIG. 25; and allows a drive sleeve or flange to be tightened as in FIG. 26.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Although the preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings are described below in connection with
replacement of a welded nozzle in the pressurizer vessel and reactor coolant piping of a nuclear power
facility, the invention is not limited to that and encompasses installation of nozzles in other vessels and
piping and the repair of existing nozzles. The invention further encompasses the initial installation of
nozzles in new as well as in existing vessels and piping. Further, the invention inherently encompasses
replacement and repair of nozzles that were previously replaced or repaired. As specifically indicated or
suggested herein, or as will be apparent to those of skill in the art, an attachment or sealing system of an
embodiment or embodiments described herein, or a feature or features of an embodiment or
embodiments described herein may be applicable to, or incorporatable in, other embodiments.
The embodiments of full replacement nozzles and assemblies depicted in FIGS. 3-7 are identical to those
in FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12, respectively, of the prior application. In those embodiments, the original
welded nozzle 26 (FIG. 2) has been completely removed, leaving the J-groove weld. 34 and the cladding
29 surrounding the bore 30 for the nozzle substantially in tact. The old nozzle may be machined or drilled
out; therefore destroying the nozzle. In the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-7 herein, and in the prior
application, the replacement nozzle may be clamped, bolted, flanged, or interference fitted in the bore or
hole of the vessel.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 61 depicted in FIG. 3 (FIG. 6 in the prior application), employs a
compressive loading system for mechanically attaching a nozzle body 62 to vessel 20. The compressive
loading of the nozzle body 62 is accomplished by bolting a cylindrical sleeve 68 to the bore against the
nozzle body 62, which loads the nozzle body in compression within the bore. Here, the nozzle assembly
61 includes the nozzle body 62 and the cylindrical sleeve 68. Loading the nozzle body in compression

makes it less susceptible to PWSCC. If a crack developed in the nozzle body due to PWSCC (or any
other mechanism), since the nozzle body is loaded in compression, the crack will not propagate, or at
least is less likely to propagate. This principle is applied in other mechanical nozzle replacements
discussed below. The nozzle body 62 has a tapered portion 63 which may be a full or partial length taper
ending in a smaller diameter end 64 projecting from the interior entrance of the bore 60 in the vessel 20
and a larger diameter end 65 within bore 60. The nozzle body 62 also includes a tubular portion 66
projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20. The diameter of the tubular portion 66 is smaller than the
larger diameter end 65 of the tapered portion 63, and a flange 67 is formed where the diameter of the
bore changes from the smaller to the larger diameter. The nozzle assembly 61 also includes an externally
threaded cylindrical sleeve 68, and the bore 60 includes a threaded cylindrical portion 69 and a tapered
portion 70. The sleeve 68 has wrenching flats 59 on the exterior circumference thereof for tightening the
sleeve in the bore. Tightening the sleeve 68 in the threaded bore portion 69 against the flange 65 of the
nozzle body forces the tapered portion 63 of the nozzle body into a compressive mechanical engagement
with the tapered portion 70 of the bore 60 to mechanically attach the nozzle body 62 to the vessel 20. A
mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle portion 63 and the
tapered bore portion 70 by engagement of the two surfaces, which are polished as described above and
in the prior application. Sleeve 68 is tightened sufficiently to ensure that the seal is obtained. Instead of
polished surfaces, sealing material as described in the prior application and herein may be positioned
within bore portion 70 between the bore wall and the exterior of the nozzle body 63 to create the seal.
If necessary, a spring washer as described in the prior application or a Belville washer may be employed
between nozzle sleeve 68 and the flange 65 of the nozzle body 62 to live load the seal, i.e., maintain a
resilient compressive loading on the seal which self compensates over time due to seal shrinkage or other
factors. The seals in most of the embodiments described herein may similarly be live-loaded by a spring
or washer, and specific reference thereto is not made in every such embodiment The sealing material
may comprise gasket material or packing material, for example, Grafoil seal material, Grafoil seal rings,
packing glands etc., as is known in the art.
Typically, rings and packing materials may be employed where the seal is radially restrained, e.g., the
sealing material 56 in FIG. 8 between the bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159; and gasket
material may be employed elsewhere, e.g., the sealing material 56 in FIG. 8 between the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152 and the end 73e of the nozzle 71e. The packing material and packing gland may be of
Grafoil, e.g., a Grafoil seal ring as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,826,217 (cited above).
FIG. 4 (FIG. 7 in the prior application) illustrates a replacement nozzle 71 bolted to the vessel. Full nozzle
71 is similar to fill nozzle replacement assembly 61, but is one-piece, and includes a tapered nozzle body
72 having a smaller diameter end 73 at the interior entrance of the tapered bore 60 in the vessel 20, a
tubular end 75 projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20 and a larger diameter, tubular threaded portion
76. The diameter of the nozzle body 72 increases from the interior end 73 to the threaded portion 76.
(Reference numeral 60 indicates a bore with a full or partial taper in it and numeral 30 indicates a

cylindrical bore of a single diameter or a plurality of diameters.) The diameter of bore 60 similarly
increases from the interior end of the bore to a cylindrical threaded portion 77 at the exterior end of the
bore. Wrenching flats 59 are provided on nozzle body 72 adjacent the threaded portion 76 for tightening
the nozzle into the threaded portion 77 of the bore 60. The nozzle 71 is structurally attached to the vessel
20 by tightening the nozzle into the bore, which forces the tapered portion of the nozzle body 72 into
compressive mechanical engagement with the tapered bore 60 to mechanically bolt the nozzle body 72 to
the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle
portion 72 and the tapered bore 60 by engagement of the two surfaces, as described above in connection
with FIG. 3 and in the prior application.
Referring to FIG. 5 (FIG. 10 in the prior application), full nozzle replacement assembly 71c is bolted to
vessel 20 by an exterior flange 86c and bolts 88c. Both the nozzle body 72c and the bore 30 are
cylindrical, and the mechanical attachment of the nozzle assembly 71c to the vessel is achieved by
bolting the flange 86c directly against the exterior wall of the vessel. The flange 86c is a separate piece
from the nozzle body 72c and may be attached to the nozzle body in any suitable manner, e.g., by a weld
87 (which should be stressed relieved prior to installation). However, the flange 86c and nozzle body 72c
may be formed as one piece, as shown in FIG. 11 of the prior application. The flange 86c is contoured to
follow the contour of the exterior wall of the vessel 20 against which it bears. Spacers 91 are provided
between the heads of bolts 88c and the flange 86c. A thin corrosion resistant sleeve 89, e.g., made of
Alloy 690, is shrink fitted or rolled into bore 30 so as to mechanically seal the sleeve 89 to the bore 30.
Sealing material 56 between flange 86c and the exterior vessel wall provides the pressure retaining
mechanical seal.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 71b depicted in FIG. 6 (FIG. 9 in the prior application) is compressively
mechanically attached to vessel 20 by an exterior flange 86 bolted to the vessel 20 by a plurality of bolts
88 and threaded holes 90 in the exterior wall of the vessel Exterior flange 86 is a separate piece from
nozzle 71b (or in an alternate embodiment may be one-piece with or without welding to the nozzle), and is
engaged with nozzle assembly 71b as follows. Nozzle assembly 71b includes a tubular end 75b of
reduced diameter projecting from the vessel 20 which forms a circular shoulder or flange 92. Flange 86
includes a circular recess 94 with a central hole 96 therein. The shoulder 92 on the nozzle assembly 71b
is received in the recess 94 in the flange 86 with the tubular portion 75b of the nozzle body 72b passing
through the central hole 96 in the flange's recess 94. Bore 60 and nozzle body 72b are tapered generally
as described for nozzle 71 in FIG. 4, and tightening bolts 88 causes the flange 86 to draw the nozzle body
72b into bore 60 into compressive frictional engagement therewith. If necessary, spring washers (not
shown) may be provided between the heads of bolts 88 and flange 86. A mechanical seal is obtained
between the exterior of the nozzle body 72b and the walls of bore 60, as described above in connection
with FIGS. 3 and 4.
Full nozzle replacement 110 shown in FIG. 7 (FIG. 12 in the prior application) is frictionally attached to the
vessel 20 and mechanically sealed by an interference fit of the nozzle 110 in the bore 30. Nozzle 110 is

tubular and bore 30 is cylindrical. At equal temperatures of the nozzle 110 and the vessel portion 20
surrounding the bore 30, the diameter of the nozzle is slightly larger than the diameter of the vessel bore.
The nozzle 110 is inserted into the bore by creating a substantial temperature gradient between the two
so that the diameter of the nozzle is reduced or the diameter of the bore is increased, or both. The
temperature of the vessel 20 surrounding the bore 30 is increased to expand the diameter of the bore, or
the nozzle 110 is cooled to reduce its diameter, or both. After the nozzle 110 has been inserted into the
bore 30, the temperature gradient is reduced so that the nozzle 110 frictionally engages the wall of the
bore 30 in an interference fit to both mechanically attach the nozzle and mechanically seal its exterior with
the wall of the bore at the operating temperatures of interest. The exterior of the nozzle and the bore are
polished to assist in creating a seal therebetween. If desired, a mechanical seal or seals, in addition to the
mechanical seal obtained from the interference fit and polished surfaces, may be provided as discussed
herein and in the prior application.
FIGS. 8-20 illustrate embodiments of full and partial nozzle replacement assemblies which are
improvements over the embodiments illustrated in the prior application (including FIGS. 3-7 of this
application which are identical to FIGS. 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12, respectively, of the prior application), and
which introduce features not disclosed in the prior application as well as applying features disclosed in the
prior application for improved full nozzle replacement and partial nozzle replacement, which may also be
applied to nozzle repair. As indicated above, individual features, or combinations of features, from the
embodiments of FIGS. 8-20 may be applied to other embodiments, or combined in various combinations.
FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 show variations of the full nozzle replacement 71 of FIG. 4 for partial nozzle
replacement assemblies 150, 170, 180, 190 and 190a that include the part (or stub) 152 of an existing
nozzle adjacent the interior of the vessel 20 and a partial replacement nozzle 71e, 71f, 71g, 71h and 71i,
respectively. For FIG. 10A, the partial nozzle replacement assembly 185 is a variation of the full nozzle
replacement of FIG. 7, which includes an existing nozzle stub 152 and a partial replacement nozzle 110a.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 10A, 11 and 12, a portion of the existing nozzle is removed leaving
the nozzle stub 152 extending into or flush to the bore from the interior of the vessel. Both the nozzle stub
152 and its J-groove weld 34 are left in tact and substantially undisturbed. Removal may be accomplished
as described above for removal of the entire nozzle, and in other ways which are known to those of skill in
this art. The vessel bore may be altered only to the extent of threading it adjacent the exterior of the
vessel, and/or it may be enlarged or tapered as described below.
Referring to FIG. 8, a portion 77e of the bore 30 adjacent the exterior of the vessel is enlarged in diameter
and threaded. A shoulder 156 is formed in the bore 30 at the interface of the larger diameter portion 77e
and a smaller diameter portion 30e. The replacement nozzle 71e likewise includes a smaller diameter
portion 158 sized to be received in the smaller diameter bore portion 30e and a threaded larger diameter
portion 76e to be threadedly received in the larger diameter bore portion 77e, and a flange 159 at the
interface of the smaller and larger diameter portions. Sealing material 56 (e.g., packing material) is
positioned in the bore between the bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159. The replacement nozzle

71e is tightened to the bore (using the wrenching flats 59) to compressively mechanically and structurally
attach the replacement nozzle 71e to the vessel 20. Also, tightening the replacement nozzle 71e in the
bore compresses the sealing material 56 between the bore shoulder 159 and the nozzle flange 157 to
mechanically seal the replacement nozzle 71e to the vessel. Another mechanical seal may be provided in
the bore between the interior end 73e of the replacement nozzle 71e and the end 162 of the nozzle stub
152 by sealing material 56 (e.g., gasket or packing material) which also is compressed by tightening the
nozzle to the bore. Where a mechanical seal is provided between the annular edges of adjacent nozzle
sections, such as the end 162 of nozzle stub 152 and the interior end 73e of replacement nozzle 71e, the
edge is chambered at 163 for the new and existing nozzle (not shown) to cause the seal to compress
radially into the nozzle and prevent the packing material from extruding through the gapped region
between the two nozzles. Achieving the seal between nozzle stub 152 and replacement nozzle 71e
requires some axial loading on the existing nozzle stub 152. Alternatively, a gap may be left between the
replacement nozzle 71 and the existing nozzle stub 152 so that the existing nozzle stub 152 is not
subjected to any axial or radial loading which might otherwise stress the J-groove weld 34. The length of
tubular section 158 is selected so that some thread is available in the vessel bore after initial installation
to further tighten the nozzle into the bore during service to compensate for shrinkage of the sealing
material 56. The bore and nozzle or external compression sleeve are similarly threaded in FIGS. 3, 9, 10,
11, 12-24. The mechanical seals formed at bore shoulder 156 and the nozzle flange 159, and at the end
162 of nozzle stub 152 and the interior end 73e of replacement nozzle 71e are adjustably-loaded, i.e., the
degree of compression of the respective sealing material 56 may be adjusted during service, for example,
to compensate for seal shrinkage. In most the embodiments disclosed herein, the mechanical seals are
similarly adjustably-loaded, and specific reference thereto will not be made in each embodiment.
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 170 depicted in FIG. 9 differs from the partial nozzle
replacement assembly 150 in FIG. 8 in that the replacement nozzle 7 If of FIG. 9 seals with the existing
nozzle stub 152 around the circumference thereof without axially loading the nozzle stub 152. In this
embodiment, the bore 30 from a point overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 to the exterior of
the vessel is enlarged in diameter to define the enlarged diameter portion 77f and a shoulder 156 in the
portion of the enlarged bore overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stud 152. The enlarged diameter bore
portion 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel. The replacement nozzle 71f is sized to be
received in the larger diameter bore portion 77f and includes a threaded portion 76f threadedly received in
the threaded portion of larger diameter bore portion 77f The ID of the replacement nozzle 71f at the
interior end 174 thereof is enlarged to receive therein the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152. Sealing material
56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is positioned between the bore shoulder 156 and the end 174 of the
replacement nozzle 71f surrounding the end of the nozzle stub 152. The replacement nozzle 71f is
tightened to the bore to compressively, mechanically and structurally attach the replacement nozzle 71f to
the vessel 20. Also, tightening the replacement nozzle 71f in the bore compresses the sealing material 56
against the shoulder 156 and against the outer circumference of the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 to
mechanically seal the replacement nozzle 71f to the vessel. Sealing material 56 (e.g. gasket material)

may also be compressed between the end 162 of the existing nozzle stub 152 and shoulder 175 where
the nozzle ID changes diameter however, this would axially load the nozzle stub.
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 180 depicted in FIG. 10 differs from the partial nozzle
replacement assembly 150 in FIG. 8 in that the replacement nozzle 71g seals axially only with the end
162 of existing nozzle stub 152. The bore 30 is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel, but unlike the
nozzle replacement assembly 150, the bore 30 extending from the end of the nozzle stub 152 to the
exterior of the vessel is not enlarged in diameter, and no shoulder is formed in the bore sufficient to insert
a seal. The replacement nozzle 71g is sized to be received in the bore 30 and includes a threaded portion
76g threadedly received in the threaded portion of the bore. Tightening the replacement nozzle 71g to the
bore mechanically bolts and structurally attaches the replacement nozzle 71g to the vessel 20. A
mechanical seal is provided in the bore between the interior end of the replacement nozzle 71f and the
end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 by sealing material 56 (e.g. gasket material) which is compressed
therebetween when the nozzle is tightened to the bore. The nozzle replacement 170 (FIG. 9) without the
sealing material 56 between the end 162 of nozzle stub 152 and the shoulder 175 of the nozzle 71f is
presently preferred over this embodiment and the embodiment of FIG. 8 because those embodiments
axially load the existing nozzle stub 152.
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 185 depicted in FIG. 10A applies a sleeve 110a in the bore 30,
as described for sleeve 110 of FIG. 7 to mechanically attach and seal the sleeve 110a in the bore 30.
Additionally, sealing material 56 is compressed between the interior end of the sleeve 100a and the end
of 162 of the nozzle stub 152 when the sleeve 110a is attached by hydraulically or other means forcing
the nozzle into the vessel.
FIG. 11 shows another variation of the full replacement nozzle 71 of FIG. 4 for a partial nozzle
replacement assembly 190 that includes an existing nozzle stub 152 adjacent the interior of the vessel 20
and a replacement nozzle 71h. In this embodiment, the bore 60 from which the existing nozzle has been
removed is enlarged in three sections. The bore is tapered in a first section 74h immediately adjacent the
nozzle stub 152, increasing in diameter as the bore progresses towards the exterior of the vessel. In a
second section 182 adjacent the tapered first section 74h, the bore is cylindrical having the largest
diameter of the tapered section 74h. In a third section 77h, the bore has a diameter further enlarged from
that of bore section 182 and is threaded. A shoulder 156 is formed in the bore 60 at the interface of the
two larger diameter sections 182, 77h. The replacement nozzle 71h likewise includes a tapered portion
72h sized to be received in the tapered section 74h of the bore, a smaller cylindrical portion 184 sized to
be received in the cylindrical section 182 of the bore, and a threaded larger diameter portion 76h sized to
be threadedly received in the threaded larger diameter section 77h. The replacement nozzle 71h is
structurally attached to the vessel 20 by tightening the nozzle into the bore, which forces the tapered
portion 72h of the nozzle into mechanical engagement with the tapered section 74h of the bore to
mechanically bolt the replacement nozzle 71h to the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between
the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle portion 72h and the tapered bore section 74h by

engagement of the two surfaces, as described above and in the prior application. A gap 186 is left
between the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152 and the interior end of the replacement nozzle 71h. However,
another mechanical seal may be provided in gap 186 as shown in FIG. 12 (described below).
The partial nozzle replacement assembly 190a shown in FIG. 12 is identical to partial nozzle replacement
assembly 190 except that no gap is left between the tapered nozzle portion 72h and the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152, and sealing material 56 (e.g., gasket or packing material) is positioned thereat and
compressed when the replacement nozzle 71i is tightened to the bore to form another mechanical seal
within the bore.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 10, 11, and 12, a shoulder similar to shoulder 156 in FIG. 8 may be provided
in the gap region 188 in the bore, and a flange may be provided on the nozzle similar to flange 159 in
FIG. 8, and another mechanical seal may be provided in this gap, as shown in FIG. 8. (This additional
mechanical seal may also be provided in the embodiments of FIGS. 13, 14, 15 and 16.)
FIGS. 13-16 respectively illustrate full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b, 232 and 242 in which the
existing nozzle has been completely removed. The nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b and 232 in
the embodiments of FIGS. 1315, respectively, employ full nozzles which extend to the interior of the
vessel while the replacement nozzle assembly 242 in the embodiment of FIG. 16 employs a partial nozzle
that terminates within the bore of the vessel sealed with respect to a shrink fit sleeve 244 that extends to
the interior of the vessel and packing material 56. The full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b, 232
and 242 all utilize a nozzle assembly of at least two parts excluding the seals themselves which includes
a drive or compression sleeve threaded to the bore of the vessel like the nozzle assembly 61 shown in
FIG. 3.
Referring to FIGS. 13-16, the procedure for the installing full nozzle replacement assemblies 61a, 61b,
232 and 242 removes the existing nozzle entirely, and the vessel bore is altered to provide tapered and/or
larger diameter sections, and/or threads in the bore adjacent the exterior of the vessel.
Full nozzle replacement assembly 61a depicted in FIG. 13, like the nozzle assembly 61 of FIG. 3,
employs a compressive loading system for mechanically attaching the nozzle to vessel 20, and includes a
nozzle body 62a having a tapered portion 63a having a smaller diameter end 64a projecting from the
interior entrance of the bore 60 in the vessel 20 and a larger diameter end 65a within bore 60. The nozzle
body 62a also includes a tubular portion 66a projecting from the exterior of the vessel 20. The diameter of
the tubular portion 66a is smaller than the larger diameter end 65a of the tapered portion 63a, and a
flange 67a is formed where the diameter of the nozzle changes from the smaller to larger diameter. The
nozzle replacement assembly 61a also includes an externally threaded cylindrical drive sleeve 68a, and
the bore 60, includes a threaded cylindrical portion 69a and a tapered portion 70a. Tightening the sleeve
68a (using wrenching flats thereof, not shown) into the threaded bore portion 69a against the flange 67a
of the nozzle body forces the tapered portion 63a of the nozzle body into compressive mechanical
engagement with the tapered portion 70a of the bore 60 to mechanically attach the nozzle body 62a to

the vessel 20. A mechanical seal is obtained between the contacting surfaces of the tapered nozzle
portion 63a and the tapered bore portion 70a by engagement of the two surfaces, as described above.
Sleeve 68a is tightened sufficiently to ensure that the seal is obtained.
The full nozzle replacement assembly 61a described so far with respect to FIG. 13 is basically the same
as for the full nozzle assembly 61 of FIG. 3, except for the lengths of the tapers in the nozzle body 62a
and the bore 60a the length of the taper in the bore and nozzle may vary from embodiment to
embodiment. For example, the taper may be less than 1/2" in length. In addition, nozzle replacement
assembly 61a provides packing material for a secondary seal at the interface of the tapered and
cylindrical sections of the bore (i.e., at the flange 67a of the nozzle), and includes an anti-rotation device
206 described in detail below. Still referring to FIG. 13, a thrust bearing 202 is positioned between the
flange 67a of the nozzle body 62a and the interior end of the nozzle drive sleeve 68a, which facilitates
tightening the sleeve 68a in the bore 60a. Sealing material 56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is also
positioned between the thrust bearing 202 and the interior end of the drive sleeve 68a.
The anti-rotation device 206 is implemented in the full nozzle replacement assembly 61a of FIG. 13 as an
optional feature by an axial slot defined by adjacent slot portions 207a, 207b in the bore 60 and in the
tapered portion 63a of the nozzle body 62a, respectively, and key stock 208 projecting into engagement
with both the axial slot portions 207a, and 207b in the bore and the nozzle.
The full nozzle replacement assembly 61b shown in FIG. 14, like the full nozzle replacement assembly
61a of FIG. 13, is compressively mechanically attached to the vessel and utilizes a tapered bore/tapered
nozzle, but does so without actually tapering the vessel bore. Full nozzle replacement assembly 61b
similar to nozzle assembly 61a of FIG. 13, includes a nozzle body 62b and a threaded drive sleeve 68b.
The nozzle body 62b includes a tapered portion 63b, a cylindrical portion 222 and a flange 224 at the
interface of the cylindrical and tapered portions of the nozzle body. The bore 30 for full nozzle
replacement assembly 220 does not include a tapered portion, and instead includes a smaller diameter
cylindrical portion 226 and a larger diameter cylindrical portion 69b, which form a shoulder 67b at the
interface thereof. Instead of a tapered bore section, a sleeve 204 having a cylindrical OD and a tapered
ID is positioned in the smaller diameter bore section 226 sized to engage the tapered nozzle portion 63b
when the drive sleeve 68b is tightened to the bore. The sleeve 204 has a flanged interior end 223 which
engages the flange 67b in the bore to initially hold and position the sleeve 204 in the bore. Sealing
material 56 (e.g., packing or gland material) is positioned between the nozzle flange 224 and the interior
end of the drive sleeve 68b which is compressed when the drive sleeve is tightened to the bore.
Tightening the drive sleeve 68b to the bore compressively loads the nozzle body 62b to the vessel. Full
nozzle replacement assembly 61b provides a seal at the interface of the different diameter sections of the
bore 226, in addition to the mechanical seal between the tapered surfaces of the nozzle and the sleeve
204.

Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 16, the flange 224 on the nozzle body 62b may be omitted, the tubular
section 222 of the nozzle body adjacent the exterior end of the drive sleeve 68b may be threaded along
with drive sleeve 68b, to mechanically attach the nozzle body to the vessel and compress the sealing
material 56 between the end of the drive sleeve and the flanged portion 223 of the sleeve 204, and lock
nuts may be tightened against the drive sleeve to prevent the drive sleeve from loosening in the event the
vessel or nozzle experiences vibration due to fluid-induced vibration or some other mechanism. As
discussed above full nozzle replacement assembly 61b provides a seal at the interface of the different
diameter sections of the bore, in addition to the mechanical seal between the tapered surfaces of the
nozzle and the sleeve 204. This arrangement allows separate loadings for the two sealing surfaces, and
can be applied to other embodiments as well.
Referring to FIG. 15, full nozzle replacement assembly 232 employs a cylindrical bore 30 threaded
adjacent the exterior of the vessel 20 and a full replacement nozzle that is mechanically attached to the
vessel 20 by a drive or attaching sleeve 68b threaded to the vessel. Full nozzle replacement assembly
232 includes a nozzle body 233, and the drive sleeve 68b and a seal alignment spacer sleeve 235. The
nozzle body 233 has tubular section 234 ending in a flanged end 236 projecting into the interior of the
vessel 20. Spacer sleeve 235 and the end 236 of the nozzle body in the interior of the vessel are flanged
at the angle of the ID of the vessel. Drive sleeve 68b, is threaded adjacent its exterior end and is sized to
be threadedly received in the threaded portion of the bore 30 structurally attaching the sleeve and nozzle
assemble to the vessel. The spacer sleeve 235 is positioned in the bore between the drive sleeve 68b
and the flanged end 236 of the nozzle body 233. Sealing 56a (e.g., a first packing seal ring or gland is
positioned between sleeves 68b and 235 and sealing material 56b (e.g., a second packing seal ring or
gland) is positioned between sleeve 235 and the flanged end 236 of the nozzle body 233. The nozzle
body 233 is positioned in the bore 60a, followed by sealing material 56b, the inner sleeve 235 and sealing
material 56a. The drive sleeve 68b is threaded to the bore 30, and a nut 238 is tightened to a threaded
section 229 of the tubular section 234 of the nozzle body 233 to mechanically compress sealing materials
56a and 56.
Referring to FIG. 16, full nozzle replacement assembly 242 (referred to as a full nozzle since all of the
existing nozzle is removed) employs a bore 30 similar to the one shown in FIG. 14, which includes a
cylindrical section 226 of smaller diameter opening to the vessel interior and a cylindrical section 60b of
larger diameter opening to the exterior of the vessel which is threaded adjacent the opening to the
exterior of the vessel. The cylindrical bore sections 222 and 60b of different diameter form a shoulder 67b
within the bore at the interface of the two sections. The full nozzle replacement assembly 242 includes a
nozzle body 243 having a tubular section 222 and a drive sleeve 68b. The tubular section 222 terminates
within the smaller diameter section 226 of the bore and projections therefrom in an exteriorly threaded
section 229. The drive sleeve 68b is exteriorly threaded adjacent the interior end of the sleeve and sized
to be threadedly received in bore section 60b. The drive sleeve 68b is interiorly threaded adjacent the end
projecting from the vessel. The full nozzle replacement assembly 242 also includes a sleeve 244 shrink
fitted to the cylindrical nozzle section 222 and extending to the shoulder 67b in the bore as described

above in connection with nozzle 110 in FIG. 7, with the end 246 of the nozzle body 243 received in the
end of the sleeve 244. Sealing material 56 (e.g., a packing seal ring or gland) is positioned in the bore
between the shoulder 67b and the flange 204 of the nozzle body. After the sleeve 244 has been shrink
fitted to the bore 30, the sealing material 56 is positioned at flange surface 67b and the drive sleeve 68b
is tightened to the bore to compress the sealing material 56. The threaded section 229 of the nozzle body
243 is threaded to the drive sleeve 68b to structurally attach the nozzle body 243 to drive sleeve 68b
which is structurally attached to the vessel with threads 69b. The locking nuts 228 prevent the nozzle from
loosening.
In the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-4, 6-16 and 21, mechanical seals are provided solely within the
bore. In FIGS. 5, 17-20, and 22-25, mechanical seals are or may be provided also at the vessel OD.
FIG. 17 shows a full nozzle replacement assembly 250 which is a variation of the full nozzle replacement
assembly 61b shown in FIG. 14 and incorporates an anti-rotation device and two leak paths features. The
function of the leak paths is to channel any reactor coolant leakage which may occur through a corrosion
resistant leak path out past the exterior surface of the vessel in a visible manner, e.g., to the oxygenated
environment where the coolant can flash steam without eroding the vessel. Like full nozzle replacement
assembly 220 of FIG. 14, the bore 30 of full nozzle replacement assembly 250 includes a smaller
diameter cylindrical portion 226 and a larger diameter cylindrical portion 69b, which form a shoulder 65b
at the interface thereof. The full nozzle replacement assembly 250 is similar to that of nozzle assembly
61b of FIG. 14 in that nozzle assembly 250 includes a nozzle body 62b and a threaded drive sleeve 68b,
with the nozzle body 62b including a tapered portion 63b, a cylindrical portion 222 and a flange 224 at the
interface of the cylindrical and tapered portions of the nozzle body. As in the full nozzle replacement
assembly 61b of FIG. 14, instead of a tapered bore section, the full nozzle replacement assembly 250
includes a sleeve 204 having a cylindrical OD and a tapered ID positioned in the smaller diameter bore
section 226 sized to engage the tapered nozzle portion 63b when the drive sleeve 68b is tightened to the
bore. Full nozzle replacement assembly 250 (FIG. 17) includes the following additional elements: a first
anti-rotation device 255 for preventing rotation of the sleeve 204 in the bore; a second anti-rotation device
258 for preventing rotation of the nozzle body 62b in the bore, circumferential vapor collection groove
282, first packing seal ring or gland 56a, flat washer 260, Belville washer 262; lantern ring 264; two
concentric packing seal rings or glands 56b, c; axial vapor channel slot 280, gasket 56; channeling sleeve
268; channeling passages 270, and jam nut 271. Full nozzle replacement assembly 250 provides a
primary seal at the tapered sections 226, 63b of the sleeve 204 and the nozzle body 62b, a secondary
seal at the packing seal ring 56a, and a tertiary seal at the packing seal rings 56b, c.
The anti-rotation device 255 (FIG. 17) comprises registered slot portions 271a, b, in the vessel and the
flange 223 of the sleeve 204 and a key stock 208 in the registered slot portions. The anti-rotation device
255 prevents the sleeve 226 from rotating relative to the bore. The anti-rotation device 258 comprises
registered slot portions 271a, b in the sleeve flange 223 and on the nozzle body flange 224, and a
cylindrical key stock 208 in the registered slot portions 271a, b. The anti-rotation device 258 prevents the

nozzle body 62b from rotating relative to the sleeve 204, and thereby from rotating relative to the vessel
20. The slots 271a, b and the key stock 208 for anti-rotation devices 255 and 258 may be of circular or
rectangular cross-section. The flat washer 260 and the Belville washer 262 assist in securely
compressively loading the nozzle body 62b in the bore, and line-load the seals.
As mentioned, the packing seal ring 56a provides a secondary seal to prevent leakage. The packing seal
rings 56b, c. provide a tertiary seal forming a primary leak path with the inclusion of lantern ring 264 that
axially projects between the concentric packing seal rings 56b, c and includes a series of passages 265
spaced circumferentially about the lantern ring extending axially therethrough from one end to the other.
The passages 265 are positioned to extend between the spaced concentric packing seal rings 56b, c into
circumferential groove 276 where the coolant collects and passes through a series of passages 270
spaced circumferentially (i.e., each having a circumferential width of substantially less than 360 degrees)
extending axially from one end to the other of drive sleeve 68b and allows the coolant to escape to the
atmosphere. The finction of the slot 268 in the lantern ring 264 is to collect any fluid which may leak past
an assumed failed seal at the tapered nozzle body 63b and the tapered sleeve 226 interface or the bore
to tapered sleeve 226 interface and the secondary packing seal ring 56a, and to channel the leaked fluid
to the axial passages 265 in the lantern ring 264. Grooves 269 perpendicularly intersecting circumferential
grooves 268 channel the leaked fluid to the circumferential grooves 268. The function of the slot 276 in
the sleeve end 272 is to collect any fluid which passes through the passages 265 in the lantern ring 264
and to channel that fluid to the axial passages 270 in the sleeve 68b. Thus, the primary leak path directs
any fluid passing between the tapered nozzle body portion 63b and the sleeve 204, and/or between the
sleeve 204 and the bore, which also leaks past a failed secondary packing seal ring 56a, to the passages
265 in the lantern ring 264 and the passages 270 in the sleeve 68b, from which the leaking fluid is
discharged at the end 274 of the drive sleeve 68b outside of the vessel. Although not shown, the lantern
ring 264, packing seal ring 56c, and sleeve 274 could easily be modified to channel the primary leak path
between sleeve 274 and nozzle body 62b. The groove 276 is of sufficient depth to allow additional
compression by tightening sleeve 68b should the seal shrink with time.
Elements defining the secondary leak path include: an axial slot 280 in drive sleeve 68b which the
channeling sleeve 268 overlays; and a radial groove 282 extending 360 in the circumference of the drive
sleeve 68b closed by the channeling sleeve 268. The radial groove 282 starts in the axial channel 280
and extends in the drive sleeve 68b past the channeling sleeve 268 where it opens to the outside of the
vessel. Gasket 56 prevents in leakage on to the vessel. Thus, the secondary leak path directs any fluid
passing between the tapered nozzle body portion 63b and the sleeve 204, and/or between the sleeve 204
and the bore, which also leaks past a failed first packing seal ring 56a and a failed second packing seal
ring 56b and/or c to the radial channel 282, which then directs the fluid to axial groove 280 from which the
leaking fluid is discharged outside of the vessel in a corrosion resistant means such that leakage will not
erode the vessel.

FIG. 18 shows a partial nozzle replacement assembly 300 which is a variation of the full nozzle
replacement assembly 250 of FIG. 17, and which incorporates a feature or features from the partial
nozzle replacement assembly 170 of FIG. 9, to provide a partial nozzle replacement assembly that
includes an existing nozzle stub 152 adjacent the interior of the vessel 20. In this embodiment, like nozzle
replacement assembly 170 (FIG. 9), a portion of the existing nozzle is removed leaving the nozzle stub
152 extending into the bore from the interior of the vessel. Both the nozzle stub 152 and its J-groove weld
34 are left in tact and substantially undisturbed. The entire portion 77f of the bore 30 extending from the
end of the nozzle stub 152 to the exterior of the vessel is enlarged in diameter, including a portion 174
overlapping the end 162 of the nozzle stub 152. A shoulder 65b is formed in the interface of the smaller
and larger diameter portions. The enlarged diameter bore portion 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of
the vessel. The replacement nozzle assembly 300 includes a nozzle body 62c and a drive sleeve 68c,
similar to nozzle replacement assembly 250 of FIG. 17. However, the nozzle body 62c is configured like
the one piece nozzle 71f of FIG. 9 in that it overlaps the existing nozzle stub 152. The ID of the
replacement nozzle body 62c at the interior end 174 thereof is enlarged to receive therein the end 162 of
the nozzle stub 152, as in replacement nozzle 170 of FIG. 9. A packing seal ring 56a is positioned
between the bore shoulder 67b and the end 174 of the nozzle body 62c, surrounding the end 162 of the
nozzle stub 152, and another packing seal ring 56d is applied at the flanged end 174 of the nozzle body
62c. The anti-rotation device 310 of the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300, which differs from the
anti-rotation devices of full nozzle replacement assembly 250, includes an axial slot 171a in the existing
nozzle stub 152 and a tab 208a machined into the nozzle body 62c and radially projecting therefrom into
the slot 171a. If tortional loads are high a plurality of axial slots and tabs can be used.
Alternatively, the anti-rotation device 310 may be formed by axial groove portion, circular or tapered in
nature, in the existing nozzle stub 152 and a similar groove in nozzle body 62c into which the key stock is
inserted and held (several grooves and key stocks could be used if tortional loads demanded such). The
nozzle groove is of sufficient length to allow further compression loading from time to time The nozzle
replacement assembly 300 is otherwise as described for nozzle replacement assembly 250 depicted in
FIG. 17, and includes the primary and secondary leak paths as described for nozzle replacement
assembly 250.
FIG. 19 depicts a partial nozzle replacement assembly 320 similar to the partial nozzle replacement
assembly 300 shown in FIG. 18, but which bolts the nozzle sleeve 68d to the vessel exterior with a flange
87a similar to the one used to bolt nozzle assembly 71c to the vessel as shown in FIG. 5. The nozzle
body 62d is inserted into the bore, and the flange 87a along with channeling sleeve 268 (fabricated and
fillet welded 324 to flange) is sealed against an annular taper guide 322 and the vessel OD by sealing
(e.g., gasket) material 56, and bolted to the vessel exterior with threaded bolts 88c in threaded holes 90c
in the vessel. Taper guide 322 provides alignment of the nozzle to the vessel such that the nozzle may be
compressed into the vessel to form a tight interference fit to resist external bending loads that may be
applied to the nozzle. (Though not shown for the other embodiments this may be applied to all of the
embodiments in this application.) The drive sleeve 68d is then tightened to channeling sleeve 268 to

compressively load the nozzle body 62d to the vessel. The jam nut 271 is then tightened to prevent the
drive sleeve 68d from loosening. This embodiment also provides the same primary and secondary leak
paths and anti-rotation device as in the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300, and is otherwise the
same as the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300.
FIG. 20 depicts a partial nozzle replacement assembly 330 also similar to the partial nozzle replacement
assembly 300 shown in FIG. 18, but which bolts the drive sleeve 68e to the vessel exterior with an
external flange 86a similar to the one used to bolt nozzle assembly 71b to the vessel as shown in FIG. 6.
Exterior flange 86a is a separate piece from drive sleeve 68e (or in an alternate embodiment may be onepiece with the drive sleeve), and is threaded to the drive sleeve 68e. The external flange 86a is bolted to
the vessel exterior by threaded bolts 88 in threaded holes 90 with the sealing (e.g., gasket) material 56
surrounding the taper guide 332 compressed between the end of a sleeve portion 334 of the flange 86a
and the exterior of the vessel. Flange 86a is bolted on in this manner such that it does not have to
conform to the curvature of the vessel as does flange 87a of FIG. 19 which can be difficult for heater
nozzles inserted on the hillside of the spherical shaped head at the bottom of the pressurizer vessel The
drive sleeve 68e is threaded to the flange 86a to compress the packing seal rings 56a-d. This
embodiment is otherwise like the partial nozzle replacement assembly 300 (FIG. 18) and provides the
same primary and secondary leak paths and anti-rotation device.
Although only a single key stock is shown for each anti-rotation device, depending on the tortional loads
experienced by the nozzle, multiple key stocks could be used in combination.
In the embodiments described above, a structurally welded and seal welded nozzle may be full or partially
removed by cutting or machining operations. As mentioned, the invention is also applicable to
replacement of nozzles attached and sealed in other ways, (e.g., as described in the prior art discussed
above and by mechanical attachment and sealing as described herein). A full or partial nozzle
replacement, similar to a nozzle repair described below, may be of the precautionary type in which the
existing nozzle has not failed in any way and the full or partial nozzle replacement by mechanical means
is made for precautionary purposes. Typically, a precautionary replacement will also be made when the
system is shut down for other reasons, such as scheduled refueling in a nuclear facility. Further, the
invention is applicable to the repair of existing nozzles which do not require removal of the existing
nozzle.
FIGS. 21-25 disclose repair embodiments which leave the existing nozzle within the bore in tact, and
further attach the existing nozzle to the vessel and mechanically seal the existing nozzle to the vessel. A
nozzle repair may be used in the event that the existing nozzle leaks or as a precaution in which the
existing nozzle has not failed in any way and the mechanical sealing and further attachment of the nozzle
to the vessel are made for precautionary purposes. In the embodiments of FIG. 21-25, the existing nozzle
is mechanically sealed to the vessel, and may be further attached to the vessel by a fillet weld between
the existing nozzle and a sleeve which is mechanically attached to the vessel. FIG. 26 provides a system
applicable to the embodiments of FIGS. 21-25 which enables the drive sleeve to be torqued even after

the fillet weld is applied to the existing nozzle. In the embodiments of FIGS. 21-24, the existing nozzle is
cut off outside of the vessel to enable mechanical sealing to proceed, and in the embodiment of FIG. 25,
the existing nozzle is left entirely in tact by use of a split seal and flange. FIGS. 21-25 apply to nozzle
repair, features and techniques disclosed herein and in the prior application for full and/or partial nozzle
replacement. Typically, a precautionary repair will be made when the system is shut down for other
reasons, such as scheduled refueling in a nuclear facility.
FIGS. 21-24 depict a nozzle repair assembly 350, 360, 370, and 380 in which an existing nozzle 352 is
left entirely in tact within the bore 30 but is cut off at some point 354 outside of the vessel 20. nozzle
repair assembly 350 of FIG. 21 applies a technique similar to the partial nozzle replacement assembly of
FIG. 9 to nozzle repair. Referring to FIG. 21, the diameter of the bore 30 is enlarged starting at a point
spaced in the bore from the J-groove weld 34 to provide an enlarged diameter bore section 77f as in FIG.
9. The bore section 77f is threaded adjacent the exterior of the vessel 20 and a sleeve 71f is threaded to
the bore, as in FIG. 9. Sealing (e.g., packing) material 56 positioned between the interior end 174 of the
sleeve 71f and the shoulder 156 formed where the larger diameter bore section 77f meets the smaller
diameter bore 30, and is compressed when the sleeve is threaded to the bore to provide the mechanical
attachment and the mechanical seal. The nozzle repair assembly 350 is the same as the partial nozzle
replacement assembly of FIG. 9, except that the entire existing nozzle 352 is left within the bore and no
changes are made to the existing nozzle (and bore). The existing nozzle 352 may be welded to the sleeve
71f with a fillet weld 356 to provide for further attachment of the nozzle 352 to the vessel 20, functioning
as an anti-ejection device or the sleeve 71f may be modified and a clamping device 406 used as shown in
FIGS. 26 and 27 (described below) to allow the sleeve to be torqued from time to time to compress the
mechanical seal and prevent leakage.
In the nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 depicted in FIGS. 22-24, respectively, the techniques of
the partial nozzle replacement assemblies 300, 320 and 330 of FIGS. 18-20, respectively, are applied to
repairing a nozzle. The nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 are the same as the partial nozzle
replacement assemblies 300, 320 and 330 of FIGS. 18-20, except that the entire existing nozzle 352 is
left within the bore. Also, the existing nozzle 352 in nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370 and 380 may be
welded to the respective sleeve with a fillet weld 356 to provide for further attachment of the nozzle 352 to
the vessel 20, functioning as an anti-ejection device, or the respective sleeves may be modified as shown
in FIG. 26 for the reason stated above in connection with FIG. 21. The nozzle repair assemblies 360, 370
and 380 of FIGS. 22-24 utilize the leak paths of FIGS. 18-20 and other elements shown in FIGS. 18-20,
respectively. Another difference between the embodiments of FIGS. 22 and 24 and those of FIGS. 18 and
20 and is that in FIGS. 22 and 24 the exterior mechanical seal between the respective sleeve or flange is
made with packing material in a short enlarged bore diameter section 358 defining an annular groove
between the bore and the sleeve at the OD of the vessel, while in FIGS. 18 and 20 the seal is made on
the exterior surface of the vessel OD with gasket material.

The nozzle repair assembly 390 depicted in FIG. 25 is a combination of the nozzle repair assembly 360
and 380 in FIGS. 22 and 24. Nozzle repair assembly 390 utilizes a flange 86c similar to the clamp device
86b of FIG. 24 and a portion 392 of a drive sleeve similar to the drive sleeve 68c of FIG. 22. In addition,
the flange 86c is split and is clamped to the existing nozzle 352 by bolts 394. The split flange 86c
frictionally engages the existing nozzle to mechanically attach the nozzle to the vessel. This enables the
sleeve portion 392 and the clamp device 86c to be attached to the existing nozzle 352 and the vessel 20
without cutting the existing nozzle and without the need for a weld to provide additional structural support.
The sleeve portion 392 mechanically seals the existing nozzle 352 in the same manner as the partial
nozzle replacement assembly of FIG. 18 and the nozzle repair assembly of FIG. 22 are sealed, except
that the clamp device 86c may be tightened to the vessel after initial assembly and tightening of the clamp
device 86c, without breaking any weld, by tightening bolts 88 to compress the mechanical seals therein
after initial installation. However, if desired, the nozzle 352 may also be fillet welded to the clamp device
86c to provide additional support.
FIG. 26 depicts a technique for attaching the sleeve of FIGS. 21-24 to an existing nozzle 352 so that the
sleeve may be tightened to the bore while attached to the existing nozzle. In the nozzle -to- sleeve
attachment 400, the nozzle 352 is welded to a compression ring 402, and the sleeve 61 is rotatably
coupled to the compression ring 402 rather than being welded to the existing nozzle 352. The
compression ring 402 is internally threaded, and an externally threaded tubular sleeve 404 through which
the existing nozzle 352 passes is threaded to the compression ring 402. The tubular sleeve section 404
has wrenching flats 59 is rotatably coupled to the drive sleeve 61 by a mechanical clamp arrangement
406 comprising circumferential grooves 408, 409 in adjacent ends of the drive sleeve 61 and the tubular
sleeve section 404, and a split clamp 412 having annular projections 414, 415. The annular projections
414, 415 of the split clamp 412 are rotatably received and engaged in grooves 408, 409, respectively. A
jam nut 418 is threaded on the tubular sleeve section 404 against the compression ring 402. After the
drive sleeve 61 has initially been installed and tightened, the tubular sleeve section 404, compression ring
402 and jam nut 418 (loosened) are installed and clamped to the drive sleeve 61 with the clamp
arrangement 406, as follows. The compression ring 402 is welded to the existing nozzle with the fillet
weld 356. The tubular sleeve section 404 is turned in a counter clockwise direction such that tubular
sleeve section 404 rotates out of compression ring 402 and compresses the nozzle, with minimal loading,
into the compression ring 402 to load the drive sleeve 61. The jam nut 418 is then tightened. During
service, the loading on the drive sleeve 61 may be adjusted without breaking the fillet weld 356 by
backing off the jam nut 418 and rotating the tubular sleeve section 404 using the wrenching flats 59. The
jam nut 418 is then re-tightened against the compression ring 402. Also, depending upon the torqued
relationship of the compression ring 402, drive sleeve 404 and jam nut 418, the nozzle-to-sleeve
attachment 400 may provide either tension or no load to the existing nozzle 352, or compression as
described above. Where the existing nozzle 352 is either tensioned or not loaded, ring 402 would not be
referenced to as a "compression" ring.

FIG. 27 depicts a technique for attaching the sleeve of FIGS. 21-24 to an existing nozzle 352 so that the
sleeve may be tightened to the bore while attached to the existing nozzle. In the nozzle -to- sleeve
attachment 400 (FIG. 26), the nozzle 352 is welded to a compression ring 402, and the sleeve 61 is
rotatably coupled to the compression ring 402 which is welded to the existing nozzle 352. In the
embodiment of FIG. 27 no weld to the nozzle is employed, and instead the nozzle is frictionally clamped
to the sleeve 61 by a split clamp 420. The split clamp 420 includes the annular projection 414 of clamp
412 which is rotatably received and engaged in the groove 408 of the sleeve 61. The other end of the split
clamp 420 includes a split ring 424 extending into frictional engagement with the nozzle 352. Tightening
the bolt 394 compresses the split ring 424 around the nozzle 352 to frictionally clamp the nozzle. The
sleeve 61 may be tightened simply by loosening bolts 394 on the split clamp 420. Once sleeve 61 is
tightened, bolts 394 are retorqued.
As mentioned above, after implementing a repair according to the embodiments of FIGS. 21-25, a full or
partial nozzle replacement may be made later as described herein for the applicable replacement, e.g.,
FIGS. 17-20. For example, after a repair according to FIGS. 22, 23 or 24 was made, a partial nozzle
replacement according to FIGS. 18, 19 or 20, respectively, may be made, and after the repair shown in
FIG. 22 was made, the full nozzle replacement shown in FIG. 17 may be made. Other variations will be
apparent to those of skill in the art from the disclosure herein.
As also mentioned above, the implementations described herein of the nozzle replacements and repairs
avoid all or some of the problems discussed above, and the embodiment of FIG. 17 avoids all of the
problems discussed above. The partial nozzle replacements, such as the embodiment of FIG. 18, avoid
all the concerns except that of continued cracking. Partial nozzle replacements that do not have sealing
between the new and existing nozzles, such as the embodiment of FIG. 11, may not over come all the
corrosion concerns if they are placed in an environment that is not stagnant. While further analysis,
evaluation and information is necessary to determine whether all of the embodiments disclosed herein are
acceptable for the life of the facility, they are all believed to be acceptable for at least short term, most
likely long term, and in most cases the life of plant given that they are installed in the locations for which
they were designed, e.g., those embodiments with a gap between the existing and new partial nozzle are
in stagnant environments, and repaired nozzles include fracture mechanic evaluations justifying that the
nozzle will not continue to crack beyond the seal. However, the repair embodiments and the partial nozzle
replacement embodiments not employing seals between the existing and new partial nozzle (in
environments which may not be suitable for long term corrosion concerns) could at least be used for an
interim period until such time it was determined necessary or prudent to replace the repaired nozzle or
partial nozzle with one of the other full or partial nozzle replacement embodiments described herein. In
certain circumstances, such as particular plant modes of operation, one repair or replacement
embodiment or technique may be more suitable than another given these conditions. Those experienced
in the art are capable of making the determination as to whether or not a particular embodiment or
technique used for a particular application can be considered short term, long term, or a life of plant repair
or replacement. In the event the repair or replacement is considered as interim and it becomes necessary,

those experienced in the art can select the appropriate full or partial nozzle replacement that corresponds
to the repair or partial nozzle previously used.
As indicated above, rather than replace all or part of an existing nozzle or repair an existing nozzle, the
invention can be applied to provide a plug, particularly for a heater sleeve. For example, in the case of a
failed heater and heater sleeve, the heater sleeve may be fully or partially removed and replaced as
described above but with a plug or capped nozzle rather than a nozzle due to the fact that a new heater
may not be available.
All of the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3-26 may be used in large bore piping, as well as pressure
vessels in general, and do not require entry into the vessel or pipe or a remote system to install them.
In the claims, the term vessel is used in a broad sense and, unless otherwise indicated, is meant to
include, but not to be limited to, vessels, piping, etc., of different types which may operate under pressure
and which may be used in different nuclear and non-nuclear ASME pressure vessel applications, and the
term nozzle is used in a broad sense and is meant to include, but not be limited to, nozzles, sleeves, large
bore pipes, pipe portions, etc. Also, where applicable in the claims, "nozzle" encompasses a nozzle
assembly, which may include a nozzle having one or more parts, seals, one or more anti-rotation devices,
and one or more leak paths.
While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many
variations and modifications, as will be evident to those skilled in this art, may be made without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, it will be apparent that one or more features in
one embodiment may be applicable to other embodiments, or applied to a full or partial nozzle
replacement, or to a repair. Although many examples are described above, specific reference of the
applicability of a feature described in connection with one embodiment is not made in every other
applicable embodiment One such example is that the thrust bearing 202 in FIG. 13 may be used in the
embodiments depicted in many of the other figures. Other examples will be apparent to those of skill in
this art.
Therefore, the invention, as set forth in the appended claims, is not to be limited to the precise details of
construction set forth above, as such variations and modifications are intended to be included within the
spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

PATENT CITATIONS
Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

US1658525
*

Dec 6, 1926

Feb 7, 1928

Evelyn C Housley

Flue joint

US1817850

Feb 8, 1930

Aug 4, 1931

Schwalbach

Heater

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

*
US2711841
*
US2800912
*
US2874749
*

US2935341
*

Applicant

Title

Alfons P
Jan 17, 1952

Aug 17, 1956

Aug 3, 1956

Aug 19, 1957

Basf Ag

Corrosion-proof
covers for
pressure vessels

Jul 30, 1957

Everett Bernard S

Mounting for
pressure relief
valve

Feb 24, 1959

Firestone Tire &


Rubber Co

Valve for
directional
change

May 3, 1960

Steinen William F

Nozzle mounting
with automatic
lock for flexible
plastic tubing or
hose
Nuclear vapor
generating
apparatus

Jun 28, 1955

US3114414
*

Feb 14, 1958

Dec 17, 1963

Babcock &
Wilcox Co

US3348850
*

Jan 27, 1967

Oct 24, 1967

Michael J Scales

Pipe joint and


seal

US3491198
*

Jan 24, 1968

Jan 20, 1970

Ocean Science &


Eng

Pressure vessel
wall penetrator

US3746308
*

Dec 22, 1971

Jul 17, 1973

Vatterott & Glass


Tool & Mfg I

Gas manifold
construction

Mar 17, 1981

Westinghouse
Electric Corp.

Method of
repairing a
heating element
in a pressurizer

US4255840
*

Oct 21, 1975

US4319961
*

Dec 6, 1979

Mar 16, 1982

Framatome

Fixing device for


detachably
fixing a heating
element

US4400020
*

Aug 10, 1981

Aug 23, 1983

Keller Russell D

Pressure tank
connector

US4436117
*

Dec 2, 1982

Mar 13, 1984

Martin John E

Leak resistant
plug assembly

Jun 12, 1981

Apr 3, 1984

Hitachi, Ltd.

US4440339
*

Method of
repairing
housing of

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

control rod
driving system
US4480841
*

Oct 13, 1982

Nov 6, 1984

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Apparatus and
method for
sealing a tube
joint

US4553776
*

Oct 25, 1983

Nov 19, 1985

Shell Oil
Company

Tubing
connector

Arla

Pipe connection
with a seal ring
satisfying
hygienic
demands

Mar 4, 1986

Hackett Steven B

Method and
means for in situ
repair of heat
exchanger tubes
in nuclear
installations or
the like

Sep 16, 1986

Combustion
Engineering Co.,
Inc.

Method of and
apparatus for
providing an
annular seal
Method for
replacing tubes
in a header or
drum

US4570983
*

US4573248
*

US4611813
*

Mar 15, 1983

Jun 4, 1981

Sep 28, 1984

Feb 18, 1986

US4615477
*

Apr 27, 1984

Oct 7, 1986

The Babcock &


Wilcox Company

US4655483
*

May 14,
1984

Apr 7, 1987

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Boundary seal
for vessel
penetration

May 12,
1987

Murray Europe
S.P.A.

Pipe-flange
coupling with
irreversible
screwing at
rotation

Jun 30, 1987

Cummins
Atlantic, Inc.

US4664425
*

Jun 11, 1986

US4676717
*

May 22,
1985

Compressor
housing having
replaceable inlet
throat and

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

method for
manufacturing
compressor
housing
US4723795
*
US4786461
*

May 5, 1986

Sep 30, 1983

Feb 9, 1988

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Instrument
penetration for
high pressure
vessels

Nov 22, 1988

Westinghouse
Electric Corp.

Reactor internals
hold down
spring
Apparatus and
method for
sealing a tube
joint

US4826217
*

Mar 31, 1986

May 2, 1989

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

US4877271
*

Apr 1, 1987

Oct 31, 1989

Rexnord Inc.

Hydraulic
connector

Westinghouse
Electric Corp.

High pressure
thimble/guide
tube seal fitting
with built-in low
pressure seal
especially
suitable for
facilitated and
more efficient
nuclear reactor
refueling service

Siemes
Aktiengesellschaft

Repair lining
and method for
repairing a heat
exchanger tube
with the repair
lining

The Babcock &


Wilcox Company

Method of
replacing a
heater nozzle in
a nuclear reactor
pressurizer

The Babcock &


Wilcox Company

Two piece
pressurizer

US4996018
*

US5079837
*

US5091140
*
US5094801
*

Apr 19, 1989

Mar 5, 1990

Feb 26, 1991

Jan 14, 1992

Aug 16, 1991

Feb 25, 1992

Jan 22, 1990

Mar 10, 1992

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

heater sleeve
US5149490
*

US5196160
*

US5197177
*

Dec 17, 1991

Mar 23, 1992

Mar 25, 1992

B&W Nuclear
Service Company

Method and
apparatus for
replacing a
nozzle

Porowski Jan S

Nuclear reactor
head and process
for obtaining
same

Mar 30, 1993

Bayer
Aktiengesellschaft

Device for
repairing or
renewing
container
nozzles of
enamelled
apparatus
Method and
apparatus for
replacing a
nozzle

Sep 22, 1992

Mar 23, 1993

US5202082
*

Dec 17, 1991

Apr 13, 1993

B&W Nuclear
Service Company

US5209895
*

May 29,
1990

May 11, 1993

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Method of
repairing a
nuclear assembly

Dec 14, 1993

B&W Nuclear
Service Company

Replacement
nozzle and
method for
replacing a
nozzle in a
pressure vessel

Dec 28, 1993

B&W Nuclear
Service Company

Method for
replacing a
nozzle

US5271048
*

US5274683
*

US5278878
*

US5297187
*

Dec 21, 1992

Apr 27, 1993

Nov 13, 1992

Jan 11, 1994

Porowski Jan S

Process for
reducing tensile
welding stresses
in a nozzle in a
nuclear reactor
shell

Dec 23, 1992

Mar 22, 1994

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Pressure vessel
penetration

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

sealing device

US5323428
*

US5367678
*

US5404382
*

US5513227
*

US5603361
*
US5619546
*

Dec 31, 1992

Dec 6, 1990

Oct 25, 1993

Jun 21, 1994

Jun 21, 1994

Nov 22, 1994

Apr 4, 1995

Apr 30, 1996

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Readily
disconnectable
nozzle
arrangement for
use with nuclear
reactor

The Regents Of
The University Of
California

Multiprocessor
system having
statically
determining
resource
allocation
schedule at
compile time
and the using of
static schedule
with processor
signals to control
the execution
time
dynamically

Abb Reaktor
Gmbh

Method of
exchanging a
nozzle passing
through a cover
of a nuclear
reactor pressure
vessel

Combustion
Engineering Inc.

Readily
disconnectable
nozzle
arrangement for
use with a
nuclear reactor
Portable water
balloon and
container filler

Oct 18, 1994

Feb 18, 1997

Cuisinier; Jarret P.

Apr 20, 1995

Apr 8, 1997

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Resistance
temperature
detector nozzle

Cited
Patent

Filing date

Publicatio
n date

Applicant

Title

mechanical
clamp
US5631936
*

US5675618
*

Mar 9, 1994

Oct 20, 1995

May 20,
1997

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Method and
arrangement for
compression
sealing an
omega joint

Oct 7, 1997

Combustion
Engineering Inc.

Mechanical plug
for vessel
penetration and
method therefor

* Cited by examiner

NON-PATENT CITATIONS
Reference

RTD Nozzle Seal Assembly advertisement of ABB Combustion Engineering


Nuclear Operations, Combustion Engineering, Inc.

* Cited by examiner

REFERENCED BY
Citing Patent

US6111928 *

US6125159 *

US6184047 *

US6345084 *

Filing
date

Apr 28,
1998

Jan 7, 1999

May 27,
1999

Nov 19,
1999

Publicati
on date

Aug 29,
2000

Sep 26,
2000

Feb 6, 2001

Feb 5, 2002

Applicant

Title

Combustion
Engineering, Inc.

Top mount
canopy seal
clamp
assembly

Ce Nuclear
Power Llc

Canopy seal
clamp
assembly and
method of
installation

St Assembly Test
Services Pte Ltd

Contactor
sleeve
assembly for
a pick and
place
semiconducto
r device
handler

General Electric
Company

Apparatus
and methods

Citing Patent

Filing
date

Publicati
on date

Applicant

Title

for replacing
a core spray
T-box/thermal
sleeve in a
nuclear
reactor

US6721381 *

Nov 26,
2002

Apr 13,
2004

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

Seal
arrangement
for in-core
instrument
housing

US6945566 *

Mar 23,
2002

Sep 20,
2005

Robert Bosch
Gmbh

High-pressure
connection
device

US7373989 *

Jun 8, 2005

May 20,
2008

Weatherford/Lam
b, Inc.

Flow nozzle
assembly

Framatome Anp

Procedure
and means for
replacing and
procedure for
repairing a
section of a
pipe in the
primary
circuit of a
nuclear
reactor
Threaded
pipe
coupling,
union nut,
connection
stub, and pipe
for a threaded
pipe coupling

US7430266 *

May 3,
2006

Sep 30,
2008

US7467811 *

Dec 7, 2005

Dec 23,
2008

Robert Bosch
Gmbh

US8307717 *

Aug 22,
2008

Nov 13,
2012

Refractory
Anchors, Inc.

Method and
apparatus for
installing an
insulation
material to a
surface and

Citing Patent

Filing
date

Publicati
on date

Applicant

Title

testing
thereof

US8595930

US8672621

US8681922 *

US8724766 *

US8867688

US9053828

Jan 5, 2011

Jan 27, 2011

Dec 14,
2010

Dec 3, 2013

Mar 18,
2014

Mar 25,
2014

Dresser-Rand
Company

Press-fitting
corrosion
resistant
liners in
nozzles and
casings

Dresser-Rand
Company

Welded
structural
flats on cases
to eliminate
nozzles

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

Pressurizer
with a
mechanically
attached
surge nozzle
thermal
sleeve

May 8,
2007

May 13,
2014

General Electric
Company

Compression
sleeves usable
in nuclear
reactors

Jan 18, 2011

Oct 21,
2014

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
mounting
structure

Jun 9, 2015

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

Nuclear
reactor
bottommounted
instrumentati
on nozzle
repair method

Weatherford
Technology
Holdings, Llc

Erosion
resistant flow
nozzle for
downhole
tool

Mar 11,
2013

US9097104

Nov 9, 2011

Aug 4, 2015

US9180557

Apr 21,
2014

Nov 10,
2015

Areva Inc.

Two-piece
replacement

Citing Patent

Filing
date

Publicati
on date

Applicant

Title

nozzle

US9435481 *

Dec 17,
2012

Sep 6, 2016

Westinghouse
Electric Germany
Gmbh

Steam
generator
heating tube
repair device
and repair
method

US20040051306 *

Mar 23,
2002

Mar 18,
2004

Gerhard Weiss

High-pressure
connection
device

US20050117684 *

Mar 4, 2004

Jun 2, 2005

Klarner Richard
G.

Reactor head
with integral
nozzles

US20050135537 *

Oct 1, 2003

Jun 23,
2005

Bruce Hinton

Pressure
vessel

US20050199591 *

Mar 9, 2005

Sep 15,
2005

Westinghouse
Electric Co. Llc

Method of
forming a
weld pad

US20050284643 *

Jun 8, 2005

Dec 29,
2005

Weatherford/Lam
b, Inc.

Flow nozzle
assembly

Payne Ronal J

Small
diameter bore
pressure
vessel
penetration
modification

Jun 15,
2006

Juergen Frasch

Threaded
pipe
coupling,
union nut,
connection
stub, and pipe
for a threaded
pipe coupling

Sep 7, 2006

Framatome Anp

US20060078080 *

Jan 27,
2005

US20060125231 *

Dec 7, 2005

US20060198488 *

May 3,
2006

Apr 13,
2006

Procedure
and means for
replacing and
procedure for
repairing a
section of a

Citing Patent

Filing
date

Publicati
on date

Applicant

Title

pipe in the
primary
circuit of a
nuclear
reactor
Debiasi
International
Limited

Pressure
vessel for
vehicular air
brake system

General Electric
Company

Nozzle
segments and
method of
repairing the
same

Jensen Grant C

Compression
sleeves usable
in nuclear
reactors

Refractory
Anchors, Inc.

Method and
apparatus for
installing an
insulation
material to a
surface and
testing
thereof

Areva Np Inc.

Method for
Repairing
Primary
Nozzle Welds

Jul 14, 2011

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

Pressurizer
with a
mechanically
attached
surge nozzle
thermal
sleeve

US20110194663 *

Aug 11,
2011

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
mounting
structure

US20110206505 *

Aug 25,

Dresser-Rand

Welded

US20080236958 *

US20080267775 *

US20080279325 *

Mar 29,
2007

Apr 30,
2007

May 8,
2007

US20110170650 *

Oct 30,
2008

Nov 13,
2008

Feb 25,
2010

US20100044348 *

US20100325859 *

Oct 2, 2008

Jun 8, 2010

Dec 14,
2010

Dec 30,
2010

Citing Patent

Filing
date

Publicati
on date

Company

Dresser-Rand
Company

Press-fitting
corrosion
resistant
liners in
nozzles and
casings

Westinghouse
Electric Germany
Gmbh

Steam
Generator
Heating Tube
Repair
Device and
Repair
Method

Pressuriser
for pressured
water nuclear
power station

Oct 3, 2012

A pressurizer
with a
mechanically
attached
surge nozzle
thermal
sleeve

Sep 29,
2011

US20130199462 *

Dec 17,
2012

CN101017711B

Dec 28,
2006

Title

structural
flats on cases
to eliminate
nozzles

2011

US20110232290 *

Applicant

Aug 8, 2013

Nov 9, 2011

CN102714068A *

Dec 28,
2010

CN102714068B *

Dec 28,
2010

Aug 3, 2016

EP2346049A2 *

Jan 18, 2011

Jul 20, 2011

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
mounting
structure

EP2346049A3 *

Jan 18, 2011

May 2, 2012

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
mounting
structure

Jan 18, 2011

Mar 13,
2013

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
mounting
structure

EP2568474A2 *

Citing Patent

EP2704152A3 *

WO2004036592A
1*

WO2011087879A
1*

WO2014074155A
1*

Filing
date

Mar 28,
2013

Oct 14,
2003

Dec 28,
2010

Apr 23,
2013

Publicati
on date

Mar 16,
2016

Apr 29,
2004

Jul 21, 2011

May 15,
2014

Applicant

Title

Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd.

Nozzle
repairing
method and
nuclear
reactor vessel

Framatome Anp
Gmbh

Method for
repairing or
preventing
damage to a
bushing

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

A pressurizer
with a
mechanically
attached
surge nozzle
thermal
sleeve

Westinghouse
Electric
Company Llc

Nuclear
reactor
bottommounted
instrumentati
on nozzle
repair method

* Cited by examiner

CLASSIFICATIONS

U.S.
Classif
ication

285/13, 285/197, 285/206, 376/260, 376/204, 285/220, 376/307, 285/211, 285/18


7, 285/15

Interna
tional
Classif
ication

G21C13/036, F16L41/08

Coope
rative
Classif
ication

G21Y2004/50, G21Y2004/301, Y10T29/49865, F16L41/08, G21C13/036, G21Y


2002/104, Y02E30/40, G21Y2002/303,G21Y2002/501, G21Y2002/302

Europe
an

G21C13/036, F16L41/08

Classif
ication
LEGAL EVENTS
Cod
e

Date

Mar 23,
1998

AS

Event

Description

Assignment

Owner name: ENTERGY OPERATIONS,


INC., ARKANSAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF
ASSIGNORS
INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIMS,
WILLIAM;REEL/FRAME:009068/0230
Effective date: 19980223

Dec 10,
1998

AS

Assignment

Owner name: ENTERGY ARKANSAS,


INC., ARKANSAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF
ASSIGNORS
INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENTERGY
OPERATIONS,
INC.;REEL/FRAME:009633/0810
Effective date: 19981201

Jan 3, 2003

FPAY

Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

Jan 22, 2003

REMI

Maintenance
fee reminder
mailed

Jan 2, 2007

FPAY

Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

Jan 5, 2011

FPAY

Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

Google Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google
Patents - Send Feedback
Data provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services

Inspection and Welding Repairs of Pressure Vessels


S. V. GUPTE
B.E., D.M.E.
ASNT LEVEL III - RT,MT,PT,VT
PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTOR (API 510), (CCOE)
PAINT AND COATING INSPECTOR (NACE - INDIA)
LEAD AUDITOR QMS
Corresponding Author Contact:
Email: guptesantosh@hotmail.com

Abstract
Repairs are required for pressure vessels in order to restore its original / intended operating
condition, safe operation and to prolong trouble free service life. The vessel condition
deteriorate due to various factors mainly Mechanical Problems, Process Related Problems
and Corrosion Problems. Repairs are required to be planned and carried out under the strict
supervision and control of a competent Inspector.
The paper briefs the various steps involved in:

Decision making for the repairs depending on location and nature of defect within the
pressure vessel as per ASME as well as API 510 code.

Welding procedure qualifications .

Materials and Welding consumables to be used for procedure qualification .

Requirements and limitations of controlled deposition welding as an alternative to


PWHT, or where Impact testing is a requirement .

By using preheating methods where Impact testing is not a requirement .

Method of "Temper bead techniques" .

Method of "Half bead technique".

NDT that can be employed before, during and after welding .

Necessity of PWHT and Hydrostatic tests .

Repairs and precautions during overlay weld repairs.

Methods and precautions to be taken during alterations and re-rating of pressure


vessels.

Aspects of reporting and re-inspection .

The Paper aims to brief the interested audience involved in welding inspection and repairs of
pressure vessels that can be conducted in Shut downs within Chemical, Refinery,
Petrochemicals and Fertilizer industries; various methods of weld repairs and related
activities such as testing after welding.
Key Words:
Owner user:

Owner or a user organization of the equipment.

Repairer:

The agency or organization, appointed by the owner user for repairs of the
equipment.

Inspector:

A competent inspection engineer having full knowledge of the pressure


vessel construction, in-service inspection welding etc.

Designer:

A competent Pressure Vessel Design Engineer.

Code:

Code or standard used for design / construction and Inspection of Pressure


vessel.

NDT
inspector:

A competent NDT inspector having thorough knowledge and experience of


NDT techniques involved in Construction and repairs.

PWHT:

Post Weld Heat Treatment given to the Pressure vessel during construction
or repairs.

1.0 Introduction:
Repair and maintenance of parts and components is a major activity in any process industry.
Repair welding can be carried out as a logical procedure that ensures the part is usable and
safe. If repairs are done with proper care or precautions, it can avoid premature failures,
large warranty claims, safety of property and personnel and result in satisfied customers.
Failures of pressure vessels are still observed, which result in a costly down time of
production and product losses also sometimes it results in environmental hazards and
unsafe working conditions or disasters. Every owner user wants to extract highest possible
safe service life from equipment. The pressure vessel repairs also cannot be an exception
this philosophy. Modern pressure vessels are constructed in accordance to a recognized code
and established fabrication and welding practice.

2.0 Method of Inspection and decision for repairs.


Pressure vessels are designed to any recognized code of design and construction. We must
under stand that the design thickness can be considerably lower than the actual Fabricated .
During design itself corrosion allowance is added in the base metal thickness and the
manufacturer fabrication chooses the next available thickness. Thereby we have a excess
thickness available for the service which result in a considerably lower operating stress
value.
Steps involved in the decision making for repairs.

Operating conditions, Inspection history, Material of construction of pressure vessel .

Reasons for failure .

Location of the damaged area by visual inspection and evaluation by NDTs.

Re-evaluate the need for repairs (Back to design calculations).

Repair Methods, (For pressure retaining parts) .

Preparation of repair procedures.

Replacement of major components.

2.1 Operating conditions, Inspection history, Material of construction of Pressure


vessel:
A careful study of the operating parameters and inspection history and properly maintained
internal inspection reports, materials of construction, its behavior with the process fluid,
welding techniques used during construction, design consideration etc, also gives an
adequate confidence level about the use of pressure vessel. Such information is also useful
for making the repair decision. Carefully selected material of construction and the
fabrication procedures, welding procedures as well as inspection and certification by the
competent inspection authorities during fabrication stage, always intend to give such
information.
2.2 Reasons for failures:
Undesirable premature failures can occur due to any one or more of the following reasons .
Faulty design, faulty workmanship, wrongly selected material of construction, wrong welding
techniques such premature failures generally occur in an early service period, where as the
normal service failures are attributed to corrosion, changes in the working parameters,
operation of the vessel for which it is not designed, impurities in the operating fluids,
metallurgical changes in the base metal etc. Once the damage is identified the pressure
vessels must be thoroughly inspected to evaluate the extent of damage, need for repair and
the repair method. Thorough visual inspection of the pressure vessel can be supplemented
by a suitable NDT examination, to locate the defects and the extent.
2.3 Location of the damaged area by visual inspection and evaluation by NDT.
On opening the equipment it is necessary to make it safe for entry as the remaining fluid or
fumes of gases could be dangerous for human life. The personnel may be required to stay
for internal inspection there could be possible repairs where hot work is involved, there fore
a safe entry permit from a competent authority i.e from the safety and operation
departments. During internal inspection, some responsible operator should always be
accessible to the inspector performing internal inspection. Such assistance can always be
handy for any critical situation. The external surface should be checked for any corrosion
below the insulation, obvious leakages, structural attachments, connections, foundations,
leak proof tightness of pressure relief valves etc. The internal surface should be reasonably
cleaned so as to visually verify its condition , condition of threaded connections, Flange
connections, closures, internalsand damage due to corrosion. Different corrosion problems
anticipated are pitting, line corrosion., General uniform corrosion, grooving, Galvanic
corrosion, Fatigue, Creep, temperature, Hydrogen attack / Embritterment, Stress corrosion
cracking, Inter-granular corrosion, etc. The identified damage can be supplemented by NDT
for the extent, where by decision for repairs can be taken confidently, various NDT possible,
are UT thickness measurement, UT scanning, RT, MPI and LPT.
2.4 Re-evaluate the need for repairs (Back to design calculations)
Based on the NDT results obtained, the same can be verified by the designer and inspector
by performing design calculations, to ensure that the remaining thickness is still safe, and

whether the repairs are warranted or not. Based on the remaining thickness corrosion rates
are calculated and the MAWP at the available thickness also calculated. If the MAWP
required is lower that the calculated MAWP then the repairs are not warranted provided the
owner user is ready to carry out internal inspection as per next scheduled interval.
Location of defect is also important. On base metal away from the weld metal, a monitor
thinning can be left unattended. In event there are borderline case the thickness can be
recalculated by carrying our full RT and thereby revising the Joint efficiency.
Following design considerations are reviewed during re-evaluation

Patch repairs welded by fillet welding can be used on temporary basis. Such repairs
shall be checked and verified by the design Engineer. The same should be replaced
with permanent measure at the next available maintenance opportunity. A fully
encirclement lap joint may be considered as a permanent repair method. Such full
encirclement patches shall also be designed to meet the code requirements.

Minimum thickness observed shall be evaluated for MAWP and the corrosion rate, so
as to decide the next inspection interval.

Location of localized corrosion, such as on the base metal, away from L seam, Away
from C seam, on the weld joints, on crown portion of the head, etc. thereby,
comparing the original design requirement. e.g. by carrying out L seam Radiography,
the joint efficiency can be revised to 1 and the remaining thickness acceptable can
be revised.

The Inspector should think out all such possibilities and advise the owner user, so as
to take a precise judgment on the repair.

2.5 Repair methods: (For pressure retaining parts)

The cracks are gouged out or removed and weld repairs can be carried out from both
sides, if approach is available,

The deep pits or localized corrosion can be weld built to restore the original
thickness.

The larger area, which cannot be welded by build up, can be replaced with patch or a
shell course or a head.

So far SMAW or GTAW has been the most widely accepted welding processes in the industry,
for its availability of welding equipment and skilled welders. However FCAW or GMAW
processes can also be used if sufficient expertise and equipment are available.
Need less to state that any code requirements, contractual requirements or any statutory /
regulatory requirement must be complied during weld repairs.
Original construction drawing, calculation data and inspection records are important for
repairs. If the original construction data is not accessible, then an analysis of the base
material, including previous weld deposits, becomes mandatory. If dimensions require close
tolerances or if flatness is critical, then benchmarks that will aid the repair without causing

excessive and expensive damage to the work piece must be established.


The crack in weld joint or a defect in the base metal can be repaired by preparing a "U" or a
"V" groove to the full depth and length of crack and then fill up by weld metal deposit as
described here. If the crack exists in the stress concentration region then consult a
competent pressure vessel design Engineer. Corroded area may be restored by weld metal
deposition as described here.
2.6 Preparation of a repair procedure:
The repair procedure should take care of the requirements of the base metal, welding
consumables, sequential weld deposits, requirements of preheat, Interpass temperature,
post weld heating, PWHT, impact test and the NDT requirements. The repair procedure shall
be qualified as per the recognized code such as ASME sec IX, using an experienced welder.
Maintain the records of procedure qualification as well as performance qualification.
If PWHT is required in original construction and it is not practicable or advisable during
repairs, then the Inspector and the Pressure Vessel Design Engineer shall review the reason
for original PWHT of the equipment. If the Original reason why PWHT was done is due to the
service requirements, then the alternative methods given below may be avoided, Details of
Repair Procedures and consideration are given in 3.0 of this article. It is allowed by the
Repair & Inspection code to avoid the PWHT as well as Pressure test after repairs.

3.0 Considerations for repair Procedures: [1 , 2]


3.1 Repair procedure alternative to PWHT, Pre heating method, where impact
testing is not done on the original equipment.

Impact testing is not required when this welding method is used.

This procedure is limited to P1-Gr. 1 & 2; P3 -Gr. 1 & 2 (Excluding Mn-Mo steels)

The weld area is pre heated and maintained at a minimum 150 deg C, during
welding. The temperature is measured to ensure 4" material or 4 times thickness
( whichever is greater) from the each edge of weld is maintained during welding.

The maximum Interpass temperature does not exceed 315 deg C

Carry out welding as per the qualified procedure.

3.2 Repair procedure alternative to PWHT, where impact testing is performed on


the original equipment.
When the original construction required impact test, Notch toughness testing as required by
the code of construction is required. A procedure need to be qualified separately by using a
groove welding on the plate Some additional requirements that can be considered over and
above the supplementary essential variable are:

This procedure is limited to P1; P3 and P4 steels.

All supplementary essential elements of ASME Section IX para QW-250 are applied.

The weld area is pre heated and maintained at a minimum 150 deg C, during
welding. The temperature is measured to ensure 4" material or 4 times thickness
(whichever is greater) from the each edge of weld is maintained during welding.

The maximum Interpass temperature does not exceed 315 deg C .

Maximum heat input shall be calculated and implemented during repairs. The
maximum heat inputs as per qualified procedure must not exceed during welding.

Qualification thickness for the plate material and the grooves are as per the table 1.

If the welding is to be done under NACE standard, MR 0175, then additional test for
hardness measure to be applied.

For SMAW welding process, electrodes with additional supplemental diffusible


hydrogen designator H8 or lower shall be used. The gas used in GTAW or GMAW or
FCAW shall exhibit a dew point no higher than minus 50 deg C.

Welding shall be carried out as per controlled deposition, temper bead or Half bead
technique.

After completion of welding, without allowing to reduce the preheat, the temperature
is raised to 230 to 280 Deg C. and held for minimum period of about 2 Hrs to assist
as Hydrogen bake out treatment.

The Hydrogen bake out treatment can be omitted if electrodes having supplemental
diffusible hydrogen designator H4 are used.

After cooling the weld metal, the excess layer of reinforcement is ground off to
match the surface contour of base metal.
Depth of Test
Groove

Repair groove Depth


Qualified.

Thickness of Test
Coupon Plate

Thickness of Base Metal


Plate (T) qualified.

<t

< 2"

Up to 2"

<t

> 2"

Above 2"

Table 1: Qualification thicknesses for test coupon and test repair groove.

3.3 Non-Destructive Examination and testing of repaired location.

The prepared surface can be checked by using MPI or LPT before welding.

After completion of welding, NDE acceptable to the Authorized Inspector or the


owner user are selected and applied to ensure soundness of the weld.

After repairs the need for pressure test is to be decided by the Inspector. The test
temperature and the minimum design metal temperature of Pressure vessel shall be
carefully evaluated.

If Hydrostatic test is impracticable, then pneumatic test should be considered with


appropriate safety consideration.

3.4 Repair to Stainless steel overlays and clad.

In event any overlay or cladding area is removed, then the base metal gets exposed
to the service environment.

The Inspector should give consideration to remove the possible entrapped hydrogen
if the service and the base metal is prone to hydrogen entrapment, hydrogen
embrittlement, Temper embrittlement etc. A heating treatment such as Hydrogen
bake out at 230 to 280Deg C, for about 2 Hrs. shall be given.

4.0 Execution of welding repairs:

The repairer, under close supervision and surveillance of the Inspector, executes
actual repairs. The written and qualified procedures are strictly followed. In case the
Impact testing is specified, the welding parameters are also monitored and ensured
to be within the range at which the procedure is qualified.

Specified NDE before welding repairs and after welding repairs are carried out and
shall be approved by the Inspector.

After repairs the inspection record and the history of equipment, giving details of
repairs, is updated and next inspection schedule shall be recommended to the owner
user.

5.0 Welding techniques: [1, 2]


5.1 Temper bead welding technique:
The heat affected zone of the bottom bead due to the top bead applied with lower size
electrode, leaves less than 20 to 30 % of the weld metal cross sectional area as a " typical
columnar grains" and the balance is a normalized structure. The top layer of the
reinforcement mainly consisting of columnar grains, is required to be ground out, to match
the surface contour.
5.2 Half bead welding technique,
After every pass, the top half of the weld bead is ground off before applying the next layer.
Such half bead technique also achievs the similar effect of temper bead technique, but then
the consumption of welding electrodes can shoot up.

6.0 Conclusion:
I wish to draw the following conclusions:

Repairs of pressure vessels are not always warranted, the decision of welding repairs
must be taken with due consideration to the location of defect, carefully evaluated
and interpreted NDE results, Design Calculations, Construction condition such as
PWHT and Impact test.

Once the decision of welding repairs is taken then it is necessary to document the
repair procedure giving details of NDT test necessary, Per heat and PWHT, welding
sequence, monitoring the welding parameters, pressure test requirements etc.

Prepare the inspection reports and follow up inspection at a predefined inspection


interval.

7.0 REFERENCES
1. API 510 - Pressure vessel inspection code.
2. ANSI NB 23 - National Board Inspection code.

You might also like