Ingl-3201-Lp1 Individual Paragraph Practice Rubric

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn
2016-2017 First Semester

English-3201-LP1
Prof. Davieliz Villafae Coln
Individual Paragraph Practice Rubric
Students Name: ___________________________________ Student Number: ______________
COMPONENTS
RANGE
Punctuality
Commitment to
Instructions
Title Page
DESCRIPTION
10
The work was submitted on time and in presentable

form (binding with staples, clips, or other materials).
The work was submitted on time but not in presentable

form. In other words, the binding of the written work
had not been finalized by the time of submission.
The work was not submitted on time (whether it was

presentable or not).
10
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD:

The written work showed commitment to
instructions as presented and discussed in class.
GOOD:
Many instructions were followed, but there were
some that were not.
FAIR TO POOR:
Some instructions were followed, but there was a
considerable amount of them that were not.
VERY POOR:
Few or no instructions were followed.
10

The title page followed the APA style.
GOOD:
The title page followed some aspects of the APA
style.
FAIR TO POOR:
The title page barely followed the APA style.
VERY POOR:
The title page did not comply with the APA style.
1

English-3201-LP1
COMPONENTS
Handwritten
Activities
RANGE
20
12
10
10
0
Peer Editing
Evaluation
16
14
2
First Keyboarded
Draft
18
DESCRIPTION
10

Activities 13 to 16 from the textbook were
completed and signed by the professor as evidence.
GOOD:
Activities 13 to 16 from the textbook were
completed but did not show the professors
signature on the specified date for revisions.
FAIR TO POOR:
Some of the assigned activities were missing either
with the professors signature or without it.
VERY POOR:
All of the assigned activities and the professors
signature were missing.
A copy of the first keyboarded draft was included
and showed great improvement from the
handwritten activity to this draft.
GOOD:
and showed some improvement from the
FAIR TO POOR:
but showed little to no improvement from the
VERY POOR:
The first keyboarded draft was not included.
The group included all the peer evaluations done to the
first keyboarded draft. In addition, each member of the
group became a peer evaluator for the rest of the
groups.

English-3201-LP1
COMPONENTS
RANGE
Peer Editing
Evaluation
(Continuation)
DESCRIPTION
The group included some of the peer evaluations done
to the first keyboarded draft, or evidence of each
members contribution to evaluate other groups
paragraphs was missing.
Writing Room
The group did not include any type of peer editing

evaluation.
Both the paper slip provided by a tutor from the Writing

Room and the draft that he/she corrected were included.
One of the evidence documents provided by or taken to
the Writing Room was missing, or none of the
documents that evidenced having received service from
the Writing Room was included.
Final Keyboarded
Draft
Heading
5
The MLA style was applied as instructed in class.
The MLA style was not applied adequately.

Topic Sentence
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The topic sentence appeared as the first sentence of
the paragraph, including indention.
The topic sentence showed a main subject and a
controlling idea (paying close attention to the
controlling idea questions).
The topic sentence was clear and focused on one idea
only.
FAIR TO POOR:
The topic sentence did not appear as the first sentence
of the paragraph, and no indention was visible.
The topic sentence showed problems with the main
subject and controlling idea.
The topic sentence was unclear and did not focus on
one idea only.
3

English-3201-LP1
COMPONENTS
Final Keyboarded
Draft (Continuation)
RANGE
DESCRIPTION
Supporting Detail Sentences
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
A minimum of 3 supporting detail sentences
appeared right after the topic sentence.
Each supporting detail sentence was directly
connected to the controlling idea of the topic
sentence.
Transitions were used to make each supporting idea
flow accordingly throughout the entire paragraph.
The repetition of terms was kept to a minimum.
FAIR TO POOR:
Some or all of the supporting detail sentences had
nothing to do with the topic sentence.
Transitions were not used, and they were necessary to
connect each supporting idea.
The repetition of terms was overused.
Concluding Sentence
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The concluding sentence appeared as the last
sentence of the paragraph.
The concluding sentence showed a direct connection
to the topic sentence without repeating the latters
main subject and controlling idea.
The concluding sentence was clear and demonstrated
that the paragraph had come to an end.
FAIR TO POOR:
The concluding sentence did not appear at the end of
the paragraph.
The concluding sentence did not show a direct
connection to the topic sentence or was simply
missing.
The concluding sentence was unclear and did not
demonstrate that the paragraph had come to an end.

English-3201-LP1
COMPONENTS
Final Keyboarded
Draft (Continuation)
Total Score
RANGE
DESCRIPTION
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The paragraph showed good use of grammar
conventions, punctuation, and spelling in general.
FAIR TO POOR:
The paragraph showed problems with grammar
conventions, punctuation, and spelling from
beginning to end.
_________/100 COMMENTS:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________

Ingl-3201-Lp1 Individual Paragraph Practice Rubric

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ingl-3201-Lp1 Individual Paragraph Practice Rubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn

2016-2017 First Semester

The work was submitted on time and in presentable

The work was submitted on time but not in presentable

The work was not submitted on time (whether it was

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD:

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD:

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD:

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn

The group did not include any type of peer editing

Both the paper slip provided by a tutor from the Writing

The MLA style was applied as instructed in class.

The MLA style was not applied adequately.

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn

University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn

You might also like