Rev 1 As Revised and Issued d09-Pmc-br-064 Mep SD Submittal Rfa

Hill International Project
Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.

One & Two ICC Project,
Dadar (E),Mumbai
INDIA-400014
E-mail: One&TwoICC@hillintl.com
www.hillintl.com
Our Ref:
D09-PMC-BR-064
Date:
28 January 2015
To:
Bombay Realty
C-1, Wadia International Centre (Bombay Dyeing),
Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli,
Mumbai 400 025, India.
Attention:
Mr Vishal Sharma (Sr. VP)
Project:
ICC Phase 1 - One ICC & Two ICC
Subject:
MEP Schematic Design Submittal Request for Approval
Dear Sir,
We refer to the MEP Schematic Design submittal as attached. We note some aspects of the
design are subject to input from consultants yet to be appointed. There is a risk of abortive
design work if the current MEP design program is maintained without all other consultant
inputs. However, there is a greater risk (construction delay and/or abortive building work) if
the MEP DD & Tender stages do not continue as per the current program.
Review Meetings were held on 27th and 28th January 2015 at BR office to finalise the review
by B&W and present the outcomes of the review including BR comments made during the
meetings. The matters discussed with the review outcomes are described in the B&W
Review Comments including Executive Summary and Tracker Sheets.
On the basis of the B&W Review Comments, it is hereby recommended that the Owner
accept the submittal with comments and request your kind approval to instruct the
consultant to proceed with the Detail Design stage of the documentation.
Program
Yours Sincerely,
Mark Sperberg
Project Manager
Hill International
Cc :
File
Attachments: Submittal electronic transmission via email on 23/01/15
Submittal transmittal (1 paper copy & CD) delivered to BR office 27/01/15
B&W Review Comments & Tracker Sheets with Review Outcome Notes
Page 1 of 1
ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN STAGE COMMENTS (ICC TOWER One & Two)
Section
Comment
Peer Review Consultant

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
MEPC Reply as per Remarks
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
Comments Remaining from Concept Stage

No details or space and volume
All required details for substation are mentioned in dwgs no. R-314-ICC-ELdrawings have been provided for the
001/002/003/004 - ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR B3/2/1/GROUND FLOOR.
substation, any of the main
switchrooms and no details have been However, electrical rooms/ DB rooms will be furnished with additional set of information.
provided of the incoming service details.
Comment-1
Comment-2
Comment-3
All switchrooms, electrical rooms, DB

rooms to be detailed as part of scheme
design package and submitted for B&W
review. This is to ensure all space and
volume provision is correctly sized and
acceptable.
Whilst spaces are identified for various items of

equipment, there is a lot of detail missing from
the drawing, generally as follows:
There is no details of the incoming 11kV
connection route and how this is routed once it
enters the building. Is the 11kV cabling ran in a
trench/on cable tray Trench/Cable tray sizes
and routes need to be identified.
Only 2No. transformers are shown for each
tower all transformers for both landlord and
apartments for both towers need to be shown.
Connections between H.T.
panel/transformers/L.T. Switchboards to be
identified.
All landlord/apartment L.T.
Switchboards/Feeder Pillars to be shown on
drawing.
High End Electrical Equipment Space

Planning Layout at Ground and
Basement -1 drawing received as part
of revised schematic design package further comments provided under
relevant section below.
LT meters located on the service floors

which feed apartment supplies on
floorsabove/below (20 floors). The
meter panels and positioning will need
to be carefully reviewed and planned
considering the clear space is between
floor and slab is approximately
1800mm. The metering allowance
(consideration for 4no. meters per floor
for each apartment ) and required space
needs to be coordinated and agreed
with TATA for schematic stage.
The Per Floor LT. Metering Scheme is finalized as per the discussion had with the Supply Co. Please provide date for release of updated
Hence, Metering at Service flrs option is now ruled-out.
drawings and confirmation that electrical shaft
is adequately sized.
The space available for the L.T. Meters at every floor is also confirmed by the Supply Co.
However, minor modifications are executed within Electrical Shaft to accommodate the
elements.
Electrical Shaft Layout at Service 1, 2 &

3 and Typical Floor drawing received as
part of revised schematic design
package - further comments provided
under relevant section below.
Some landlord cables run vertically for

240m. This may have major issues for
cable runs regarding volt drop increasing cross sectional area (cable
costs/size) and space planning of risers
needs to be reviewed for schematic
Design stage.
Ok.

3 and Typical Floor drawing received as
part of revised schematic design
package - further comments provided
under relevant section below.
Please provide date for release of updated

BR Remarks MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
Comment-4

Comment - B&W
Fire life safety equipment such as fire
pumps and Lifts should have duel
supplies in diverse routing/risers
(normal & Emergency) to the local fire
pump control panel via local changeover
switch. This NFPA requirement must be
discussed and agreed with Chief Fire
Officer and their exact requirements to
be included in Schematic stage
drawings. NFPA 13 extract below:
17.7.3.7 There shall be not less than
two sources of power supply for the fire
pumps. Where the sources of power are
electrical, these shall be a main
generator and an emergency source of
power.
17.7.3.8 One supply shall be taken from
the main switchboard by separate
feeders reserved solely for that purpose.
17.7.3.9 Such feeders shall be run to a
changeover switch situated near to the
sprinkler unit, and the switch normally
shall be kept closed to the feeder from
the emergency switchboard.
17.7.3.10 The changeover switch shall
be clearly labeled, and no other switch
shall be permitted in these feeders.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Considering the available 'space constraints', this kind of provision is not possible to
provide.
This requires urgent resolution as implications

are onerous.
Accordingly, Client is also made aware about this space / design limitation during our last
work-shop had at AHC Office.
Authority Approvals Consultant to confirm if

current MEPC provision is adequate.
As per our regular practice for other on-going projects as well, the given scheme for D.G.
back-up provision works fine with respect to the CFO requirement.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
FLS alternative route required under
NFPA. Electrical shaft to be increased
to accommodate dedicated shaft for
FLS cabling. Ref 8, item (viii) of CFO
NOC.
BR agreed at workshop 28.01.15 that
shaft would be increased accordingly.
AHC to advise FSI impact.
Further to reconfirm this issue, Liaisoing Agency to address to address the same.
There are no UPS systems shown on the Please refer dwgs no. R-314-ICC-ONE/TWO-EL-152/152A - ELECTRICAL POWER
schematic. The following systems and
DISTRIBUTION, where UPS Feed is considered at MDB-FIRE EMERGENCY.
associated components will require
UPS: Telecoms equipment, CCTV, Access
Control, BMS, Aircraft Warning Lights,
etc. This should be fully detailed at
Schematic Design stage.
The following systems and associated

components will require UPS: Telecoms
equipment, CCTV, Access Control, BMS, Aircraft
Warning Lights, etc.
Size of UPS required, where is it located?
SDB-UPS for ICC-1 serves DB's for

Access Control, CCTV & FAPA systems.
System sized to provide 15 min cover
to allow load to be transferred to D.G.
sets. UPS to Telecomms, BMS and
Aircraft Warning Ltg systems still to be
detailed. Information to be provided by
MEPC during DD Stage.
It is also recommended that 1 No.
additional service lift is supplied from
the generator to still operate in the
event of power failure.
Comment-5
Comment-6
Conceptual sizing of worse case busbars,

cable trays, trunking, etc. should be
provided to aid understanding and
provide comfort with space planning of
plant rooms and risers. The Local Utility
providers need to be contacted to
understand their requirements (e.g.
incoming telecom room size, riser sizes,
shared rooms/risers, seperate
emergency cabling riser, etc). Once
understood, MEP to show generic riser
and electrical room plans at 1:25 scale
to clearly show adequate space
planning of services and coordinated
distribution.
Dwgs submitted as SD Stage are mentioned with the sizes of Risers / cable trays etc.
The detailed information about the Tele/data rooms will not cover under our scope of
works, however necessary rooms with suitable sizes are marked as per the general
requirement.
MEPC to show generic riser and electrical room

plans at 1:25 scale to clearly show adequate
space planning of services and coordinated
distribution.
Date for release of drawings required.

3 and Typical Floor and High End
Electrical Equipment Space Planning
Layout at Ground and Basement -1
drawings received as part of revised
schematic design package - further
comments provided under relevant
section below.
Section
Comment
Comment-7
Comment-8
Comment-9
Comment-10

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
There are no Supply Authority

transformers shown. This should be
identified so as an allowance for earth
electrodes can be shown on schematic
allowing for space planning and earth
electrode positioning at next stage. All
electrode positions to be coordinated
with Architect and shown on Schematic
design drawings.
The fire alarm drawing only shows 1no.
Fire alarm panel/voice alarm at ground
level with seven loops feeding the
building. Some loops appear to be over
500m in length. MEP to liaise with
specialist fire alarm supplier to provide
manufacturers guidance to suit local
and international requirements.
Additional networked panel should be
considered at fire command, building
entrances and security office. This must
be incorporated at Schematic stage.
Details such as Supply Co. transformers will be available from the respective Supply Co.
Also, these proposed Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP) for ICC-1 & 2 will have Pier-to-pier
integration feature for the seamless integrations.
Please check this statement (2,500m max loop

length) with a FA manufacturer. The loop
usually covers zones which are limited to max.
2000 sqm area. The limiting factor of loop
length is usually the device type/quantity and
associated volt drop which usually equates to
120no. devices (which covers most
manufacturers). If sounders and flashing
beacons are powered from the loop, the
maximum loop length will decrease
dramatically.
Aircraft warning lights to follow

international guidelines as there are no
local requirements in Mumbai. Flashing
lights on Tower 1 and 2 sysetm should
be synchronised; this should be
identified at schematic stage. Any
variation to international code should
be agreed with BR.
BR to liase with Telecom providers to
record their requirements regarding
main intake room, riser allowance and
distributed rooms for apartment
telecoms and GSM (mobile telephone
antennas). MEP to incorporate
requirements in Schematic Design stage.
Ok, revised dwgs will be issued shortly.

drawings.
However, space provision for the additional Earth Pits is already made in dwgs no. R-314ICC-EL-004 - ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR.
Please confirm if the supply company have

provisionally confirmed the allocated room
sizes and locations.
As confirmed with major of Product Manufacturers, the maximum loop length of FA system Letter required from proposed fire alarm
can be extended upto 2.5Km. Hence, to have a common FACP for individual tower will
vendor to confirm current design intent is
suffice the system requirement.
acceptable.
Considering this requirement, Bsmt-1 dwgs is already incorporated with additional rooms
provisions for Tele. / Internet / GPON rooms.
Client required to appoint

AV/IT/Telecomms/Security/BMS Consultant so
all requirements can be incorporated in the
Ref. Dwgs. R-314-ICC-EL-003 - ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR 1ST BSMT FLOOR. design.
MEPC to confirm if any initial discussions have
been undertaken with the telecomms providers
to confirm outline requirements.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
MEPC now have TATA layout and are to
reflect on DD drawings to ensure space
is adequately sized. Columns
restricting access via roller shutters to
be moved and drawings updated for
DD.
Revised drawing shows additional

loops to serve the building plus
connections to repeater panels and
interface with PAVA identified.
Loop loading calculations to be
provided by MEPC during DD Stage.
Max. 125No. devices per loop
allowable - loops 1-9 appear to exceed
this limit.
Aviation Lighting Schematic for ICC-1

drawing received as part of revised
section below.
Client required to appoint

AV/IT/Telecomms/Security/ BMS
Consultant so all requirements can be
incorporated in the design.
MEPC to confirm if any initial
discussions have been undertaken with
the telecomms providers to confirm
outline requirements. Further detail to
be provided by MEPC during DD Stage.
Schematic Design Stage Comments
Electrical Calculations
9.1.2
Transformer sizing for apartment loads This will not be accepted to the Supply Company.
to be based on TCL utilising 0.95p.f. and
an overall diversity of 0.8.
Comment-1
This means the transformers are not sized for

the calculated maximum demand.
Transformer sizing for landlord area

loads to be based on TCL utilising
0.95p.f. and an overall diversity of 0.8.
Comment-2
The current calculation for transformer sizing

applies a diversity to an already diversified load
which appears unusual.
Its Supply Co. general practice herein India to derive the Transformer size based on the
Over-all Demand Load but not on the Total Connected Load (TCL). The same concept is
followed herein design.
However the P.F. is already considered is of 0.95 to size the Trafo.
Is this acceptable to Tata and if so please

provide written acceptance from Tata?
The current calculation for transformer sizing
applies a diversity to an already diversified load
which appears unusual?
This means the transformers are not sized for
the calculated maximum demand.
Is this acceptable to Tata and if so please
provide written acceptance from Tata.
Maximum demand calculation and

transformer sizing. MEPC/BR team
confirmed TATA have approved and it
is in accordance with local diversity
requirements.
Maximum demand calculation and

transformer sizing. MEPC/BR team
confirmed TATA have approved and it
is in accordance with local diversity
requirements.
Section
Comment
Comment-3

Comment - B&W
Sizing of D.G. sets insufficient to cope
with estimated emergency load during
fire condition. Estimated load during fire
is 1681kVA and 2 No. D.G. sets rated at
1010kVA and 625kVA have been
proposed. This will provide 1635kVA
which is 46kVA lower than required.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Please note, these load figures are just a ball-park figures & can be further fine tunnned
during DD Stage based on the actual load demands. And also can be fitted within the
projected D.G. Sizes.
Generators shall be sized to meet minimum life

safety requirements with no compromise for
cost/technical reasons.
However, to accommodate such small short-fall, increasing the D.G. Size will not be the
recommended solution (Techno-commercial point of view).
Please provide more detailed breakdown of

these miscellaneous loads.
Additional detail on miscellaneous

loads to be provided by MEPC during
DD Stage.
No allowance has been made within the Please refer the Electrical Load Assessment where necessary ventilation load is considered
load assessment for the car park level
for all basements.
jet fans.
It appears these allowances are for the intake

and exhaust fans but not the jet fans - please
provide more detailed breakdown to ensure
clarity.
Allowances appear to be for the intake

and exhaust fans but not the jet fans detailed breakdown to be provided by
MEPC during DD Stage.
Lift core pressurization fans are also

required at S1 level.
Noted & will be incorporated.

drawings.
Load details of lift core pressurization

fans to be provided by MEPC during DD
Stage.
The emergency lighting calculation

should be directed at escape route
floors only (target area) and should
have an average of 13.8lux and a min of
1.1lux.
Please note, the dia-lux calculation submitted is not for the entire floor plate but for the
specific areas just to give idea about the achieved lux level with designed lighting.
Please provide updated calculations to reflect

proposals to enable B&W to check and confirm
acceptance.
Detailed general and emergency

lighting calculations to be provided for
all areas by MEPC during DD stage to
prove compliance with regulations.
Please provide updated calculations to reflect

proposals to enable B&W to check and confirm
acceptance.
Please provide updated calculations to

reflect proposals to enable B&W to
check and confirm acceptance.
However, to increase the lux level the light fixture will be replace with 2x28w (which is
presently 1x28w).
The calc provided is based on 3 seperate Also its to be noted that the Emergency lighting will be provided for all drive ways / lobby
zones, with a 2.8 ceiling height (to be
areas & will not only for the escape routes. However to trace the escape route, necessary
confirmed).
EXIT signages will be provided separately.
Zone 1 produces an average lux of 5.05
and min of 0.42.
Zone 2 produces an average lux of 7.17
and min of 0.60.
Zone 3 produces an average lux of 15
and min of 0.80.
The general lighting calculation should
be in accordance with CIBSE Lighting
code and EN 12464. The car parks
should be 75 lux average on floor and
300lux on in/out ramps.
Comment-8
Generators shall be sized to meet

minimum life safety requirements with
no compromise for cost/technical
reasons.
No allowance has been made within the Please refer the Electrical Load Assessment where 100Kw load is assumed for such misc.
load assessment for the BMU.
usages.
Comment-6
Comment-7
Final Conclusion
Additional load information to be

provided by MEPC during DD Stage to
confirm actual load demands and
confirm D.G. sizing.
Comment-4
Comment-5
MEPC Comments
Lighting layout is developed as per the NBC Guidelines & accordingly avg. 30lux is required
along the drive-ways / ramps.
As the building is going for Gold rating, its necessary to control the power consumption.
However, as per the requirement to enhance the lux lvl, 1x28w light fixture will be replaced
with 2x28w.
The calc provided is based on 3 seperate

zones, with a 2.8 ceiling height (to be
confirmed).
Zone 1 produces an average lux of 32.
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A151 Earthing Schematic for ICC-One
The drawing is marked as generic only
and lacks detail for schematic design
stage.
Please elaborate which details are lacking within the dwgs.
The drawing is noted as generic only with the

intention to develop the earthing strategy.
All panels etc shown are noted as indicative.
9.1.3
Comment-1
Only the main earth system schematic drawing

has been provided, none of the other earthing
system requirements details appear to be
available, e.g. clean earth system, IT system,
Lightning Protection, equipotential bonding.
Revised drawing addresses issue

- item closed.
Section
Comment
Comment-2
Comment-3

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
No symbols have been provided on the As all dwgs elements are labeled precisely, hence no separate Symbols table is mentioned
drawings.
separately.
Dissimilar metals have been proposed
within the earthing schematic generic
drawing namely 50mm x 6mm and
25mm x 6mm GI strip and 2.5mm2 pvc
copper wire. This can provide
installation issues within the installation
as time progresses.
Earth strips for example are shown on the

schematic with no legend.
Its not possible to avoid combination of 02 dissimilar metals, as main earthing back-bone is The proposed dissimilar metal strategy is not
of GI. For flat D.B.s either we need to go with Cu. or Al. type cables. However to go with
recommended.
2.5sq.mm. Cu. is more superior option rather to go with Al., considering the Mechanical
withstand capacity of Cu.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
All parts suitablly labelled - Item
closed.
Verbal confirmation from MEPC
(received 22/01/15) that aluminium
shall be used throughout - sizing of
conductors to be addressed during DD
stage. Cost implication to be presented
as beyond BOQ.
BR agreed with B&W recommendation
at MEP workshop 28.01.15.
Comment-4
Only the main earth system schematic Please re-visit the dwgs, where earthing strategy for all various system is mentioned.
drawing has been provided, none of the
other earthing system requirements
details appear to be available, e.g. clean
earth system, IT system, Lightning
Protection, equipotential bonding.
The drawing does not identify clearly these

other systems and the associated earthing
strategy.

- item closed.
2.5mm2 PVC flex bonding conductors

Please elaborate.
undersized. Sizing of conductor to be in
accordance with SP 30 (2011): National
Electrical Code of India, Part 1, Section
14, Clause 7.
"For flexible cables, the size of the earthcontinuity conductors should be equal to the
size of the current-carrying conductors and for
metal sheathed, PVC and tough rubber
sheathed cables the sizes of the earthcontinuity conductors shall be in accordance
with relevant Indian Standards".
Sizing of conductors to be carried out

as part of DD stage. Electrical Code,
Section 7.5.2 Earth Continuity
Conductors and Earth Wires not
Contained in the Cables states the
following: The size of the earthcontinuity conductors should be
correlated with the size of the current
carrying conductors, that is, the sizes of
earth-continuity conductors should not
be less than half of the largest current
carrying conductors, provided the
minimum size of earth-continuity
conductors is not less than 1.5 mm2 for
copper and 2.5 mm2 for aluminium
and need not be greater than 70 mm2
for copper and 120 mm2 for
aluminium.
Comment-5
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A152 Electrical Power Distribution Schematic for Common Area Loads ICC-One
stage.

intention to develop the power distribution
strategy.
9.1.3
Comment-1
Please update to ensure schematic is project

specific and ensure no references to generic or
indicative.
Please ensure all loads, cable sizes, protective
devices are accurately sized.

- item closed.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
Cable sizing calculations required to
confirm that cable sizes identified on
the drawings are correct.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
As clarified earlier, all such details will be furnished during DD Stage during availability of all Calculations required for all main and sub-main
other load details.
cable sizes at schematic design stage.
Basic cable sizing shall be provided to ensure
that the electrical shafts are adequately sized
and we do not feel that this is unreasonable at
this stage of such a project. The comment we
made was Some landlord cables run vertically
for 240m. This may have major issues for cable
runs regarding volt drop - increasing cross
sectional area (cable costs/size) and space
planning of risers needs to be reviewed for
schematic stage. The response we received
was simply ok, which we do not feel is an
unacceptable response or a mechanism to
resolve this issue.
Comment-2
Comment-3
The sub-main cable sizes emanating

from D.G. Synchronising Panel to serve
Miscellaneous Emergency Loads and
MDB-Fire Emergency panels to be
added to the drawing.
We would request confirmation that a
form 3b, type 2 MDB is acceptable to
TATA. We would recommend that Form
4, Type 6 should be the minimum
standard for a MDB due to ongoing
safety conditions for operatives during
maintenance, extensions and outage
prevention, etc.
During DD Stage details.
Sub-main cable sizes shall be provided at

schematic design stage.
The design of all panel boards under TATA will be governed by TATA.
We would recommend that Form 4, Type 6

should be the minimum standard for a MDB
However, all other panel boards are recommended to go with Form3b, Type-2 construction due to ongoing safety conditions for operatives
to control the costing issue. As Form4, Type-6 will increase the costing tremendously.
during maintenance, extensions and outage
prevention, etc.
Comment-4
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
Main sub-main cable sizing calculations
required at DD stage to enable B&W to
check that cables are sized accordingly
and sufficient containment provision
has been allowed for within main
building risers. SD package allows for
worst case sizing and some sizes may
reduce subject to detailed assessment
of volt drop based on actual circuit
lenghts.
All sub-main cable sizes added to

drawing. Cable sizing calculations
required to verify as per above.
Form 3 allows adjustment of settings

and undertaking of limited
maintenance in functional units, as
applicable whilst adjacent circuits are
live. Form 4 allows for connection and
disconnection of cables, adjusting
settings and undertaking limited
maintenance in functional units, as
applicable whilst adjacent circuits are
live. Given the nature of the building
and should the need arise for works to
be undertaken to the main
switchboard we would recommend
form 4 as minimum. Cost implication to
be presented to Client as beyond BOQ.
Client to confirm requirement.
BR agreed at workshop 28.01.15 with
B&W recommendation to proceed with
form 4, type 6 for DD stage.
Comment-5
Comment-6
Circuit Protective Device cascading and

discrimination study required to confirm
acceptable operation of CPDs under
fault conditions.
Cable sizes to be shown for circuits
emanating from SDB-Emergency
Lighting and SDB-Ltg+Pwr
Cascading / discrimination will required to go with the higher rating (almost double) of
switch-gears & will increased the costing heavily. Client required to take a call on this issue
before to confirm.
Further discussions required with B&W, MEPC,

Client team.
Refer to comments above.

drawings have been provided for any of
the electrical equipment rooms
indicated on the drawings.
Comment-7
Please refer to comment above:

distribution.
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A153 L.T. Meter Schematic for Apartments ICC-One
Further discussions required with

B&W, MEPC, Client team. Study to be
provided by MEPC/switchgear vendor
during DD stage.
All sub-main cable sizes added to
drawing. Cable sizing calculations
required to verify as per above.

section below.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
stage.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
intention to develop the power distribution
strategy.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
- item closed.

9.1.3
Comment-1
Please update to ensure schematic is project

specific and ensure no references to generic or
indicative.
Cable sizing calculations required to

confirm that cable sizes identified on
the drawings are correct.

resolve this issue.
Comment-2
Comment-3
Comment-4
Comment-5
Please ensure all loads, cable sizes, protective

devices are accurately sized and included on
drawing.
Calculations required for all main and sub-main
cable sizes at schematic design stage.
Transformer serving apartment load

Its a Typographical error, please ignore the same. Anyways, as mentioned earlier, Apt.
identified as 1000kVA on schematic
Transformer selection will be governed by the respective Supply Company.
drawing but load assessment indicates a
load of 2642kVA. Schematic drawing to
be updated accordingly to show
correctly sized/number of transformers
required.
Please update drawing to ensure accuracy.
Circuit Protective Device cascading and Will be taken care by the Electrical Contractor on board during the shop dwg preparations. We expect this to be undertaken as part of the
discrimination study required to confirm
design and not by the Contractor.
acceptable operation of CPDs under
fault conditions.
Further discussions required with B&W, MEPC,
Client team.
Please refer to comment above:
distribution.
Rising busbar system should be fully

To reduce the costing part, reducing riser strategy is followed.
rated along its entire length and should
not reduce in rating as it rises through
the building.
Rising busbar system should be fully rated

along its entire length and should not reduce in
rating as it rises through the building.
Comment-6

lenghts.

is adequately sized. Maximum demand
calculation and transformer sizing MEPC/BR team confirmed TATA have
approved and it is in accordance with
local diversity requirements.
Further discussions required with

B&W, MEPC, Client team. Study to be
provided by MEPC/switchgear vendor
during DD stage.
section below.
Verbal confirmation from MEPC

(received 22/01/15) that rising busbar
system shall be fully rated along it's
entire length - to be shown on final
drawing issue. Cost implication to be
presented as beyond BOQ.
BR agreed with B&W recommendation
at MEP Workshop 28.01.15 to proceed
with fully rated rising main busbar.
Comment-7
Rating of MCB serving Penthouse

apartments insufficient for diversified
connected load. Diversified load of
53.9kW is approximately 80A. A 63A
MCB has been identified.
Ok.
Please update and reissue drawing.
Updated drawing received - issue

closed.
Section
Comment
Comment-8

Comment - B&W
Cable sizes serving apartments to be
added to drawing.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Add indicative sizes after undertaking outline

cable calculations to drawings and confirm
during DD stage.
Please confirm that space for required This option is now over-ruled & per floor L.T. Metering option is finalized.
meters (installed at technical floors) has
been coordinated and discussed with
TATA for their approval.
Comment-9
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
Updated drawing received - issue
closed.
section below.
MEP-EL-SLD-A154 Aviation Lighting Schematic for ICC-One
9.1.3
Comment-1
Comment-2
Comment-3
Comment-4

stage.
Since expected set of information need to come from the specialized Vendor & hence will
not be included within the dwgs. Also its required to check whether major products
available in Indian market fulfills this required.
An acceptable scheme design to be issued to

specialist vendor to provide detailed design.

- item closed.
No symbols have been provided on the

drawings.

- item closed.
Synchronised flashing of aviation lights

between towers not detailed on the
drawing. This will need to be addressed
for the detail design stage.
Aviation warning lighting to be designed Ok.
in accordance with international
guidelines. Any variation from
international code to be agreed with BR.
Please confirm design criteria for
aviation lighting.

- item closed.
Please confirm design criteria proposed.
MEPC to confirm design criteria

proposed. Aviation lighting is specialist
vendor design, further information to
be provided during DD stage.
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A156 Lightning Protection Schematic for ICC-One
9.1.3
Comment-1

stage
The drawing is very generic and does not

identify number of down conductors, locations
etc.
Vendor design, to be addressed during

detailed design stage.
MEP-EL-FAPA-SD-SLD-A155 Fire Alarm and Public Address Schematic for ICC-One

9.1.3
Comment-1
Comment-2

stage.
Has the fire alarm cause & effect been
agreed with BR/fire officer for operation
of elevators/gas/smoke vent/access
control etc.?
Major cause-n-effect for designed FAPA system will be general & will be as per the
respective CFO NOC requirement, however for for any specific feature / requirement
necessary call will be taken during further stages of the project.
The drawing is generic only and does not reflect

project specifics i.e. main entrance repeat
panels, correct number of loops etc.
This information is required to ensure the FA
and PA system is designed to meet the project
specific requirements.

- item closed.
CFO NOC requirements to be detailed
and further information to be provided
during DD Stage to enable B&W to
review and confirm compliance.
Please finalise now to ensure no design

changes later in the project.
Only 1No. fire alarm panel is shown on
the drawing. Additional panels at the
building entrance, fire command room
and security office to be considered and
added to the drawing.
Comment-3
As shown, the Main FACP will be located at Fire Control Room at Grd. Flr. These FACPs will
have further integration facility with Fire Repeater Panel located at main entrance. This
additional set of information will be furnished during further stages of project. However
multiple repeater panels will not be planned, considering the residential project & to
control the costing.
This is not reflected on the drawing, please

update and re-issue.
Revised drawing addresses issue,

additional FARP identified as well as
interface to PAVA system
- item closed.
Section
Comment
Comment-4

Comment - B&W
7No. loops are shown to serve the
building. Confirmation required that
loop length will not be an issue and
there are no volt drop issues when the
loops are fully loaded. Confirmation also
required on the number of devices that
can be installed per loop and that this is
not exceeded when installed.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
As FAPA system is basically a Vendor driven system, hence we dont have any control to
confirm the nos. of loops & total devices/detectors in every loop, the only thing which we
can do during DD Stage also that we can define the nos. of loops as per the worst case
scenario.
As far as Volt Drop issue is concerned, all the major system manufacturers have feasibility
to exetend the loop upto 2.5Km minimum with any workability issue.
Letter required from proposed fire alarm

vendor to confirm current design intent is
acceptable.
Please check this statement (2,500m max loop
length) with a FA manufacturer. The loop
usually covers zones which are limited to max.
2000 sqm area. The limiting factor of loop
length is usually the device type/quantity and
associated volt drop which usually equates to
125no. devices (which covers most
manufacturers). If sounders and flashing
beacons are powered from the loop, the
maximum loop length will decrease
dramatically.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
Loop loading calculations to be
provided for detail design stage.
Drawing states maximum of 125No.
detectors per loop however loops 1-9
appear overloaded.
Note, max no. of devices will reduce
with the introduction of devices with
combined sounder/strobe bases
(where applicable) thus reducing the
maximum no. per loop. Vendor to
confirm loop loadings and information
to be provided during DD stage.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A101 Space Planning Layout for Typical Floor for ICC-One

There are no drawing notes or legend
provided on the drawing and the
drawing lacks detail for schematic
design stage.
9.1.3
All required set of information is furnished to demonstrate the system / explored option for Only shaft information is provided which is still
Electrical Shaft space planning point of view. However, please elaborate which other
to be finalised and shaft size confirmed.
information is expected.
Drawing does not show any containment
routes, electrical services to landlords areas
such as lighting and small power.
Final shaft layout to be confirmed.

Primary containment added to revised
drawing. No other electrical services
shown within landlord areas outside of
the shaft.
Comment-1
Electrical layout of risers to be agreed

and drawing to be updated to suit.
Risers are sized as per the derived rating with telescopic type of option. The sizes are
referred from the manufacturers catalogues.
Comment-2
No services shown to apartments, no

apartment DB's shown etc.
Services to apartments (including DB's)

added to revised drawing.

resolve this issue.

lenghts.
Riser layouts need to be updated to
correspond with layout identified on
drawing MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A105.
All metering proposals to be shown.
Comment-3
Comment-4
Services outside of riser to be identified Space planning is elaborated to address this concern. However further detailing will be
including all primary containment
furnished during the DD Stage when further set of information will be available.
routes and service provisions to
individual apartments.
Locations for main services within

Ok.
apartments to be added to drawings
which should include, as a minimum,
distribution boards and comms cabinet
locations.
Information is required at schematic design

stage to ensure all space and volume prvision is
acceptable and works prior to commencing
detailed design.
Proposals shall be provided for all areas so they
can be agreed and approved prior to
commencing detailed design.
Please provide date for release of information.
Containment added to revised drawing.

No other electrical services shown
within landlord areas outside of the
shaft - other service details to be added
to drawing at DD stage.
Services to apartments (including DB's)

added to revised drawing - issue closec.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A102 Space Planning Layout for Service Floor 1 for ICC-One
9.1.3
Comment-1

design stage.
All required set of information is furnished to demonstrate the system / explored option for Apart from the shafts the drawing has no
information.
Where is the primary containment, lighting,
small power, fire alarms etc?

Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Risers are sized as per the derived rating with telescopic type of option (earlier this option is Information is required at schematic design
also presented to Client to demonstrate its COMMERCIAL impact). The sizes are referred
from the manufacturers catalogues.
detailed design.
resolve this issue.
Comment-2
Comment-3
M&E equipment layouts for technical

Please refer dwgs no. R-314-ICC-EL-102 - ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR
floor to be shown on the drawing and
SERVICE FLOOR-1, where all required set of information is projected.
primary service routes identified. No
details or space and volume drawings
have been provided for any of the
electrical equipment rooms indicated on
the drawings.
Apart from the shafts the drawing has no

information.
Please refer to the comment above.
Also, where is all the MEP equipment on the
drawing with associated power supplies?
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
lenghts.
Main containment routes identified on

revised drawings. Containment sizing
calcs to be provided at DD stage to
confirm sufficient size of trays.
Main plant equipment added to
drawings. Power supplies to be
identified at DD Stage.
Locations of mechanical control panels
to be identified on the drawings to
ensure sufficient space available.
9.1.3
Comment-1

design stage.
Comment-2
information.
Risers are sized as per the derived rating with telescopic type of option (earlier this option is Information is required at schematic design
also presented to Client to demonstrate its COMMERCIAL impact). The sizes are referred
from the manufacturers catalogues.
detailed design.
resolve this issue.

lenghts.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response

the drawings.

information.
Comment-3
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
9.1.3
Comment-1

design stage.
information.
detailed design.
resolve this issue.
Comment-2

the drawings.

information.
Comment-3

lenghts.

MEP-EL-SD-DWG-097 Space Planning Layout for 3rd Basement Floor
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
design stage.
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
All required set of information is furnished to demonstrate the system / explored option for No primary containment sizes identified on
drawing.
Main secondary containment with sizes to be
shown.
The drawing does not identify any other
electrical services - small power, lighting, fire
alarms etc.
5.1.1
All DB's shall be referenced and identified on

the drawing.
Comment-1

MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
Primary containment added to
drawings - sizes indicated Containment Calcs required at DD
Stage to confirm suitable sizes.
Other electrical services to be added to
drawing along with main mechanical
plant (Equipment/ducts/pipe routes) to
ensure layouts are co-ordinated across
disciplines.
DB's added to drawing and suitably
referenced - locations of DB's to be
considered, FOH locations not
considered suitable.
MEP equipment to be added to
drawing with associated power
supplies.


detailed design.
resolve this issue.
Comment-2

lenghts.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-098 Space Planning Layout for 2nd Basement Floor

design stage.
drawing.
shown.
alarms etc.
5.1.1
Comment-1

the drawing.

disciplines.
supplies.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response

detailed design.
resolve this issue.
Comment-2
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
lenghts.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-099 Space Planning Layout for 1st Basement Floor

design stage.
drawing.
shown.
alarms etc.
5.1.1

the drawing.
Comment-1


disciplines.
supplies.
Comment-2
How do you propose to get the D.G. sets Please refer the dwgs. no. R-314-ICC-EL-004 - ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR
to 1st basement level? Is addition
GROND FLOOR, where Equipment Hatch is shown for the D.G. Sets & other heavy
steelwork/lifting beams required above equipments of Bsmt.1.
access hatch? How are they removed in
future if required?
How are the D.G. sets moved into
position avoiding the structural column
within the D.G. room?
The two end generators can not be removed

via the hatch without the removal of the two
inner generators which is not acceptable.
Also, all generators are physically drawn the
same size but with different kVA ratings.
It is our view that this area requires review and
revised space planning.
Comment-3
Comment-4
Comment-5
Additional roller shutter access

between D.G. room and adjacent car
park to be provided to allow for safe
access/egress for D.G. sets.
Additional roller shutter access

between D.G. room and adjacent car
park to be provided to allow for safe
access/egress for D.G. sets.
All primary containment to be shown on Ok.

drawing (drawn to scale) with suitably
labeled indicative sizes.

drawings.
Updated drawing received, please see

additional comments under relevant
section below.

All major equipment rooms are incorporated with required set of information, however
drawings have been provided for any of other smaller size electrical rooms will be detailed out during further stage of the projects.
This requires detailing at schematic design

stage of the project to ensure all space and
volume provision is correct.

section below.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-100 Space Planning Layout for Ground Floor

design stage.
drawing.
shown.
alarms etc.
5.1.1

the drawing.
Comment-1


disciplines.
supplies.
Whilst spaces are identified for various Incoming HT Lines route will be incorporated within the revise dwgs & will issue it shortly.
bits of equipment, there is a lot of detail
missing from the drawing, generally as Substation area for Apt. is marked , however further detailing will be by the respective
follows:
supply co.
Comment-2
Comment-3
Comment-4

drawings.

section below.
They still route through the HT room. Is this

acceptable to TATA?
Acceptable to TATA -D.G. exhaust

within dedicated shaft - issue closed

drawings.

section below.
There is no details of the incoming

Landlord load will be fed through the H.T. Connections, hence no need for the Feeder Pillar.
11kV connection route and how this is
routed once it enters the building. Is the
11kV cabling ran in a trench/on cable
tray Trench/Cable tray sizes and
routes need to be identified.
Only 2No. transformers are shown for
each tower all transformers for both
landlord and apartments for both
towers need to be shown.
Connections between H.T.
panel/transformers/L.T. Switchboards to
be identified.
All landlord/apartment L.T.
Switchboards/Feeder Pillars to be
shown on drawing.
D.G. exhaust rises within H.T. Panel
room has this been agreed and
accepted by TATA?
All primary containment to be shown on
drawing (drawn to scale) with suitably
labeled indicative sizes.
Exhaust pipe are routed through the shaft & not required any access from HT Panel room.
Also required movement space is available from this shaft , considering all these scenarios
no specific permission required to asked from the TATA.
ok.
Section
Comment

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Comment-7
Comment-8

detailed design.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
section below.

resolve this issue.
Comment-5
Comment-6
How are the transformers brought to

site/off-loaded/positioned
transformers are currently shown within
their own individual rooms with no
external access.
D.G. exhaust shaft partially impedes
access into substation has this been
discussed and accepted by TATA?
There will not be individual rooms for every transformer, necessary modifications within
the dwgs will be done & resubmit the dwgs.

drawings.

- item closed.
Point not clear but explanation can be as marked for comment-3 above.
The exhaust shafts appear to restrict access to

the substation. Is this arrangement acceptable
to TATA?
drawings.
Revised drawing received - issue closed
Ok & will be issued shortly.

section below.
Additional Comments on Updated Schematic Design Package (Received 16.01.15)
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-101 High End Electrical Equipment Space Planning Layout for Ground and 1st Basement Floor
Comment-1
Comment-2
Comment-3
Comment-4
Comment-5
Have typical transformer dimensions

been identified and can you confirm
that they will fit through the roller
shutter doors.
Access around the LT switchboard at
ground floor level looks tight. Access
method to be reviewed.
Access around the HT Panel at ground
floor level looks tight. Access method to
be reviewed.
LT/HT Panel and transformer layout for
ground floor TATA sub-station to serve
apartments to be identified on drawing.
We accept that this is still in discussion
with TATA but as a minimum space
planning needs to be undertaken to
demonstrate how the HT/LT panels and
transformers interface.
MEPC have confirmed (MEP SD Review

Meeting 27/01/2015) that transformers
will fit through the opening provided issue closed.
To be addressed at DD Stage
70kVA Static Inverter in Basment-1

electrical panel room. Assume that this
to serve SDB-Emergency Lighting as
indicated on schematic drawing MEP-ELSD-SLD-A152. If so, why is this needed?
Emergency Lighting should be provided
with dedicated battery back-up for 3hr
operation and will not require UPS for
15min standby.
MEPC have confirmed (MEP SD Review

Meeting 27/01/2015) that this is static
inverter to serve emergency lighting
installation - issue closed

is adequately sized. Columns
restricting access via roller shutters to
be moved and drawings updated for
DD.
Section
Comment
Comment-6

Comment - B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
Distribution boards 2A/2B/2C/2D/2E not

shown in One ICC Electrical Panel Room
and Distribution boards 12A/12B not
shown in Two ICC Electrical Panel Room.
MEPC Comments
Final Conclusion
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A105 Electrical Shaft Layout for Service Floors 1, 2 & 3 and Typical Floor for ICC-One
Comment-1
Comment-2
Comment-3
The Per Floor LT. Metering Scheme is

finalized as per the discussion had with
the Supply Co. Space for the L.T. Meters
at every floor confirmed by the Supply
Co., details of meter locations to be
added to drawing.
Some landlord cables run vertically for
240m. This may have major issues for
cable runs regarding volt drop increasing cross sectional area (cable
costs/size) and space planning of risers
needs to be reviewed for schematic
Design stage.
MEPC confirmed shaft is approved by

TATA and metering will be shown at DD
stage.
300mm cable tray identified for ELV

within riser. What about additional
tray/ladder for BMS / Structured Cabling
/ fibre / GSM / Fire Alarms?
Specialist Sub-Contractors to be
appointed to enable sizing of main
distribution routes to be concluded.

lenghts.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A153A DB Distribution Strategy for ICC-One
Comment-1
It would have been useful to identify

MSB and SMDB's on the drawing to
provide greater understanding of
distribution strategy
Cable sizing calculations are to be
provided as part of DD to confirm all
sizes identified are suitable.
3core cable has been used to serve a

number of TP&N distribution boards what about the neutral?
Some DB's indicate the levels served
whilst others do not. It would be useful
if the levels served were added to all
boards.

lenghts.
Comment-2
Comment-3
Comment-4
General Comments from MEP Workshop 27th and 28th January 2015
Comment-1
GSM for mobile signal boost to be

allowed for by specialist sub-contractor
Comment-2
Fibre allowance for high speed internet

connection and VOIP telecoms to be
addressed by specialist sub-contractor.
BR to appoint specialist sub-contractor

to progress design. B&W to review at
DD stage.
BR to appoint specialist sub-contractor
to progress design. B&W to review at
DD stage.
CO-ORDINATION SCHEMATIC DESIGN STAGE COMMENTS (ICC TOWER One & Two)
Section
Comment
Peer Review Consultant Comment B&W
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
B&W Further Comments
B&W Final Conclusion
Schematic Design Stage Comments
General
5.1.1
Comment-1
The drawings are generally incomplete,

all primary distribution routes and
services are not identified and are
required as a minimum at schematic
design stage. We require confirmation
at this stage of the design that all the
services fit into the building.
This is unrealistic and and very general comment,

please note that the various intake line as listed
below has been incorported in the drawings.1)
water supply intake , tanker water intake ,2) ELV
entry point.3) cable tray from substation to tower
and interconnecting shafts between substation and
the electrical room,4) Rain water out going points
,6) external fire hydrant line going out ,external
hydrant locations , siamese connection points,7)
Earth pits loactions. which full fills all the
requirement as per our scope.
We reiterate that the drawings provided at not

at a level we would expect at a Schematic design
stage. There are a number of areas which still
require co-ordination and represent a risk to the
project to complete in detailed design stage.
These should be resolved at this stage of the
project.
As we have already provided all the

information required at this stage , if any
specific information about any area is
required ,we can look into and detailed
out same as per requirement
We will review the drawings to be issued

on the 16th January and make comment
where we require any further
information/details.
A clearance of 2340mm is shown below

the jet fans. Client to confirm if this
AHC has confirmed that 2,340mm is
clearance is acceptable as 2,400mm clear within local code requirements. Item
is typically the minimum requirement in a closed.
car park.
Comment-2
Sections are required through the car

park area to demonstrate that the
services fit and there is no headroom
issue. This will need to include the car
park jet fan system.
We will generate the section and will release the

same by 12 Dec 2014.
We are yet to receive these drawings.
Attached drawing for your reference
Comment-3
Sections are required through the

service floors to demonstrate that
access to all plant and equipment can
be achieved.
we have done some of the sections to co-ordinate

the sevices and cut out/Sleeve requirements in
stractural shear walls , however we will detailed out
more sections in detail design stage to show service
maintainance movement .
Sections have been provided for technical floors

where the least equipment is provided. No
sections provided for the heavily serviced
technical floors (i.e Service Floor 02). Sections
should cover any potential 'pinch point' where
MEP equipment is located.
As the main shaft has gone under revision

, we will detailed out the same once we
have the updated Architectural
Awaiting updated drawings.
drawing.Same will be released by 16th jan
2015
Item Closed.
Reviewed during workshop in Mumbai

27.01.15.
Access route to be shown and 1 meter
clearance to be provided throughout
route.
MEPC to minimise impact at DD stage.
ICC-1&2-MEP-CO-PL-097 MEP Services Layout for Basement -3 Floor Layout
5.1.1
Comment-1
Comment-2
The shafts for the pump room

ventilation are actually entering the fire
water tank and not the pump room. So
elements of co-ordination are still to
complete.
As the drawing has two background , one with shaft

as per old AHC layout and other with MEP shaft
requirements , to avoid this confusion we will reWe are yet to receive these drawings.
send the drawing after co-ordinating with AHC
team by 12 Dec 2014.
Pump room layouts required. We have

no evidence that the spaces large
enough or that they work.
A block plan with all pumps and othe equipments
Pump room should be fire rated for 2
will be released by 12th dec 2014
hours as required by NFPA 20 for such
room housing fire pumps.

Comments have been made on water tank
layout drawings.
Comment-3
All the tanks has been detailed out with all the
Access and ladder provision into Fire
sleeves ,maintanance cut out , rungs within the
Water Tanks not identified on drawing.
tanks , same will forwarded for your reference.
We note your email which states maintenance

operative will provide ladders for tank access.
We do not recommendd that this is a safe
access arrangement, fixed ladder(s) are
recommended.
Comment-4
No services shown for toilet area.
As the toilet locations are not confirmed hence

same was not attended.
We await details of this proposals for this area.
Attached drawing for Pump room area

your reference.
Noted shaft relocated.
Access on ICC1 fire water tank-1 manhole Please ensure sufficient maintenance
still appears difficult due to the position of access is maintained. We will review
the fire pumps. Please review.
again at DD stage.
Item Closed.
Item Closed.
Please provide response.
We will work on this after we receive the

drawings from AHC team
Awaiting drawing.
External ladder now provided. See

drawing ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-112
No services shown for toilet area.
Please incorporate in DD stage.
ICC-1&2-MEP-CO-PL-097A MEP Services Layout for Basement -3 Ceiling Layout
5.1.1
Comment-1
Jet fans are not identified on the

drawing. Are they co-ordinated?
Sections required to ensure there are
no headroom issues.
As discussed we will issue general section with

services one part of basement area by 12 dec 2014.
This drawing is not clear as it currently

Attached Basememt -2 (part drawing )for
includes all services. Please position on
your reference
separate drawing for review.
No layout drawing received with jet fan

layout. Please provide for review at DD
stage. Sectional drawing received.
BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
Comment-2
CFD required for car park ventilation

strategy to prove system operation.
MEPC Reply
This will be part of HVAC ventilation tender ,which

vender has to be submit before installation.
B&W Response
It is recommended that the Client

approves the car park ventilation
specialist to undertake a CFD analysis
prior to commencement of DD to prove
system operation.
Noted.
Shafts are to be constructed early in

programme and will be difficult to
change later without cost and time
issues.
Comment-3
No primary distribution routes are

identified.
Primary distribution line such as main fire loop,

sprinkler loop,water supply line to tank and to the
shaft, cable tray from substation/electrical room to
shaft , ELV cable tray from entry point to ELV rooms
and then to shaft , rain water line from terrace to
exit point in retaining wall , soil and waste main
lines from shaft to STP area.All this lines area shown
in our co-ordianted drawing
Comment-4
Pump room layouts required.
A block plan with all pump will be released by 12th

dec 2014 , further detailing will be done at detail
design stage
Comment-5
Some fire shafts are located within

ventilation shafts.
The location has been addressed to AHC for their

confirmation , this will be fine tuned as per the
architect requirement
Comment-6
Some fire shafts are located in

inaccessible locations behind car
parking spaces and staircase.
Comment-7
Main sprinkler pipe noted as a loop, but

Noted will update the drawing.
is not drawn as a loop.
This comment refers to basement level B3 and

such services are not fully identified. No
electrical services shown and no MEP services
shown in core areas.
Our electrical team has already provided

the required drawing for your approval
,resending the same for your refernce.
Noted.
Item closed.
No further comment.
We await revised drawings.
Final confirmation awaited from AHC

team
Containment routes now shown on coordination drawings.
Item Closed.

27.01.15.
Please review.
Marked up drawings identifying new

locations to be submitted as part of RFA
and updated during detailed design.

27.01.15.
Noted will look into this.

team
Please review.

Sprinkler main to be shown as a loop.

Please incorporate at DD stage.
Sprinkler main now not a loop. Is this

correct?
In addition sprinkler design at DD stage

to follow NFPA requirements for zone
control valve maximum areas.

27.01.15.
5.1.1
Comment-1
Have ventilation shaft positions been co- we have already provided all inputs to the AHC
ordinated with Architectural layout?
team , still this shaft are under review.
Comment-2
Floor drainage positions not shown.
The drawing shows the drainage points and the

section for the same.

team
This is unclear on current plans on low level

drawing, please review.
Resending the drawing which shows all

the drain requirements.

team
Please review.
Swimming pool location to be provided

by landscape consultant within 4 weeks
and shafts co-ordinated.
Item Closed.
This is still not clear on the combined
services drawing. Please position on
Floor drans now shown.

27.01.15.
Comment-3

ventilation shafts.
The location as been addressed to AHC for their

architect requirement/inputs.
Please review.

BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
5.1.1
Comment-1
Comment-2
At the MEP workshop it was agreed to

provide a co-ordinated services layout
for a particular area showing sprinklers,
lighting, fire alarms, jet fans etc. This
We will release the drawing by 12 Dec 2014.
has not been detailed. There is no
comfort at this stage that a coordinated solution is provided.

Noted will update the drawing.
Please ensure suitable clearances are

provided throughout the car park.
Jet fan positions are still not shown. All

other services appear co-ordinated.
Include at DD stage.

correct?
Sprinkler main needs to be shown as a

loop. Please incorporate at DD stage.
27.01.15.
Comment-3

ventilation shafts.
The locations has been addressed to AHC for their

architect requirement/inputs.
Comment-4
Louvres for ventilation shafts appear

small in relation to shaft dimensions.
Please provide calculations for
ventilation rates and louvre sizing.
we have provided the louvered area requirement

to the AHC team , same has been marked in the coordianted drawing .We have already provide all the We await revised drawings and car park
ventilation calculations along with schematic design ventilation schematic with louvre areas shown.
submision ,same has been attached along with this
email.
We have already shared the plan ,

sections will be shared once we have final Awaiting section drawings.
confirmation from AHC team
Comment-5
Water tank rooms to be fully detailed

and sizing and routing of incoming
water service to be shown. Incoming
water position for ICC2 shown, but
incoming water position for ICC1 not
shown.
Pump room will be detailed out in our detail design

submision , however the meter location and water
Comments made on B3 water tank drawings.
incomer has been shown infort of Icc-1 entrance
lobby
We have already shared the water tank

detailed drawing along with block plan for
various pumps ,further detialing will be
Noted.
done is next stage of design.Resend the
draiwng for ready reference.
Comment-6
Sectional drawing detailing position and

arrangement for basement ventilation As we have not yet received the confirmation for
shafts to be detailed. This taking into
Ventilation shaft , once AHC confirms the same we
account provision for attenuation and will detailed out this area with all required sections.
future maintenance.
We would recommend that this is resolved

urgently as it is a risk item for the project. The
size of the shafts and associated builder's work
means they require integration into the scheme
now to avoid any issues later in the project.
Yes we have already informed AHC team

to clear this issue and are awaiting for the
Please review.
confirmation/updated arch drawing with
our shafts incorporated.
Comment-7
Fire brigade water connection to ICC2

fire water tank from ground floor
Four way fire brigade connection is already shown
identified but not shown on schematic. in the drawing.
Please clarify. Same applies to ICC1.
Please review schematic as comment refers.
Resending the drawing by high lighting the Noted fire brigade connections now
same for reference.
shown on schmematics.

team
Please review.

Calculations received.
Item closed.
Item Closed.
Item closed.
Separate drawing now received
showing sectional detail.
Item Closed.
We await revised drawings and car park

ventilation schematic with louvre areas shown.
5.1.1
Comment-1
we have already provided all outputs to the AHC

Have ventilation shaft positions been coteam , still this shaft are under discussion and coordinated with Architectural layout?
ordinations.
Comment-2
Floor drainage positions not shown.
Please refer floor plan , the requirement is already

provided in the drawing .

Please review.
urgently as it is a risk item for the project. The confirmation/updated arch drawing with
size of the shafts and associated builder's work our shafts incorporated.
This is unclear on current plans on low level

drawing, please review.
Resending the drawing which shows all

the drain requirements.
This is still not clear on the combined

services drawing. Please position on

27.01.15.
Item closed.
Floor drains now shown.
BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
MEPC Reply
B&W Response

27.01.15.
Comment-3

ventilation shafts.

architect requirement.
Comment-4
Water tank rooms to be fully detailed

and sizing and routing of incoming
water service to be shown. Incoming
water position for ICC2 shown, but
incoming water position for ICC1 not
shown.
Pump room will be detailed out in our detail design

submision , however the meter location and water
Comments made on water tank drawings.
incomer has been shown infort of ICC-1 entrance
lobby.
We have already shared the water tank

detailed drawing along with block plan for
various pumps ,further detialing will be
Noted.
done is next stage of design.Resend the
draiwng for ready reference.
Item Closed.
Comment-5
Ventilation and cooling required for

garbage / OWC machine / sorting
room.
Will updated the drawings with this requirment.
We are working on this plan will send you

the scheme by 3rd Jan 2015
No ventilation shown in ICC 2 garbage

room. To be provided during DD stage.

team
Please review.

No ventilation appears to be provided either,

please confirm.
Comment-6
Cooling required to electrical rooms.
Only ventilation has been considered for all the

plant rooms which is more than adequate.
Please confirm no regulatory requirements to

provide cooling and no detrimental effect on
equipment in these rooms.

No ventilation or cooling shown. To be

provided during DD stage.
Cooling required to main LV room and
lift motor room.
Temperature ratings of all equipment in these

rooms will require review and confirmation.
Comment-7
Hose reels shall be provided every 100

ft in accordance with the CFO NOC.
Currently there is insufficient coverage.
Please review.
The Hose real location has been designed with

respect to total sprinklered building I,e 45 M
distance , the same has been highlighted to BR
team to get this updated in final CFO NOC.
45 metre hose reels are often not accepted as

they are more difficult to pull from the reel due
to the additional weight. Please provide
Awaiting for CFO response
coverage of fire hose reels.
Noted.
MEPC to review at DD stage.
We will await CFO response.
Comment-8
Ventilation provision to internal rooms. Will updated the requirement.

No services shown in drivers lounge. To

be provided during DD stage.
5.1.1
Comment-1
At MEP workshop it was agreed to

provide a co-ordinated services layout
for a particular area showing sprinklers, We will release the drawing by 12 Dec 2014.
lighting, fire alarms, jet fans etc. This
has not been detailed on drawings.
Comment-2

will updated the drawing .
Item closed.
Please ensure suitable clearances are

provided throughout the car park.
Attached updated drawing for your

reference

correct?
Detailed layout now shown on drawing

R-314-ICC-2-MEP-CO-102.
Sprinkler main to be shown as a loop.

Please incorporate at DD stage.

Comment-3

ventilation shafts.

architect requirement/inputs

urgently as it is a risk item for the project. The team
In addition sprinkler design at DD stage

to follow NFPA requirements for zone
control valve maximum areas.

27.01.15.
Please review.

BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
Comment-4
Louvres for ventilation shafts appear

small in relation to shaft dimensions.
Please provide calculations for
ventilation rates and louvre sizing.
Please also review position of louvre.
MEPC Reply
we have provide the area requirement to the AHC

team , same has been marked in the co-ordinated
drawing . we have already provide all the
ventilation calculations along with schematic design
submision ,same has been attached along with this
email.
B&W Response

Awaiting section drawings.
urgently as it is a risk item for the project. The confirmation/updated arch drawing with
size of the shafts and associated builder's work our shafts incorporated.
Comment-5
Sectional scaled drawing detailing

position and arrangement for basement
ventilation shafts to be detailed. We
request this detailed drawing is
provided for comment. This needs to
take into account provision for
As we have not yet received the confirmation for
attenuation and future maintenance.
Ventilation shafts , once AHC confirms the same we
Particularly at -1 Basement level we are
will detailed this area with all sections required.
concerned that the position of the fan
and attenuation as the intake louvre is
located at the level directly above and
we need confirmation on how the
layout and distribution is achieved at -1
Basement level.
Comment-1
Fire control rooms need independent

ventilation to 9.0 ACH in accordance
with NFPA guidelines.
Noted .
Please allow services accordingly.
updated drawing will be released by 3rd

Jan 2015.
Comment-2
Co-ordination of fire brigade

connections to be reviewed with
Architect. ICC2 position is currently
located behind a louvre.
Drawing is shared with AHC team for their inputs.
We await response.
Awaiting AHC confirmation for the same. Please review.


our shafts incorporated. After we receive
the sahft confirmation we will issue the
section details with all requirements
Calculations received.
Item closed.
Item closed.
Separate drawing now received
showing sectional detail.
ICC-1&2-MEP-CO-PL-100 MEP Services Layout for Ground Floor
5.1.1
Comment-3
The car park supply and extract air

shafts are not co-ordinated and clash
with areas around the building. The
concern is that this should be resolved
at this stage of the design and will
potentially significantly impact the car
park ventilation strategy. A detailed
review with the Architect is required.
Item closed.
Awaiting revised drawing.
Reviewed at workshop in Mumbai

27.01.15.
Item closed.
Louvre position moved.

As we have not yet received the confirmation for
Ventialtion shaft , once AHC confirms the same we
will detailed this area with all sections required.
Comment-4
Please confirm how the three

ventilation systems are terminated at
this level.

The car park exhust and pump room exhaust will be
discharged at higher level and supply air to the
pump room will be taken at lower level, section
showing the same will be generated once AHC
confirms the shaft locations and sizes .
Comment-5
No details have been provided for the

landlords areas at ground floor. HVAC,
fire and plumbing services to be
detailed.
Noted.same will be detailed out once AHC provide

us the final layouts.


Noted.
We will release the Out door unit

locations and other servcies provsions
Please make allowance for services to area now
which needs to be made for this area for
with design to be completed when layouts
AHC confirmation by 7th jan 2015 .
received.
Awaiting drawings.
ICC-1&2-MEP-CO-PL-101 MEP Services Layout for Podium Floor - NOTE DRAWING NOW DELETED

27.01.15.
Marked up drawing identifying outline
swimming pool location to be
submitted as part of RFA and shaft
locations adjusted accordingly.
Louvre position now shown. Connection

details to be confirmed at DD stage.
Separate single service drawings now

received.
To be refined at DD stage.
BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
5.1.1
Comment
MEPC Reply
Comment-1
The car park supply air shafts are not coordinated and clash with areas such as
the swimming pool and changing areas. As we have not yet received the confirmation for
The concern is that this should be
Ventialtion shaft , once AHC confirms the same we
resolved at this stage of the design and will detailed this area with all sections as required.
will potentially significantly impact the
car park ventilation strategy.
Comment-2

landlords areas in main entrance area.
HVAC and plumbing services to be
detailed.
Noted same will be detailed out once AHC provide


club house area. HVAC and plumbing
services to be detailed.
Noted same will be detailed out once AHC provide

B&W Response


Awaiting drawings.
section details with all requirements.
Noted.
We will release the Out door unit

locations and other servcies provsions
Please make allowance for services to area now
which needs to be made for this area for
AHC confirmation by 7th jan 2015 .
received.
Awaiting drawings.

27.01.15.
Separate single service drawings now

received.
To be refined at DD stage.
Awaiting sub-consultant appointments.
Noted.
Comment-3
As we do not have any working drawing

Please make allowance for services to area now hence are unable to freeze the services
requirements for this area.
received.
Awaiting drawings.
To complete MEP design at DD stage.
IICC-1-MEP-CO-PL-102 MEP Services Layout for Typical Floor Plan
Comment-1
Review proximity of sprinkler positions

with supply air diffusers and distance
noted ,will look into the requirements
from walls in accordance with NFPA 13.
Comment-2
Please refer to comments made on

individual services layout drawings.
No further comments.
Please note that the fine tuning of

sprinklers /grills lacations will be done
with interior draiwing in our detailed
design.
Noted.
We will review during DD stage.
Item closed.
Noted.
ICC-1-MEP-CO-PL-102A MEP Part Section Layout for Typical Floor Plan
Comment-1
Comment-2
FCU rating different to that shown on

layout plans. Please clarify.
will update the drawing
Floor standing side discharge unit

details, however specification sent by
MEP-CE is for a top discharge unit.
Please clarify.
The VRV type and location are under discussion,

however all the air cooled VRV will be top discharge
Noted.
with cowl piece to discharge the hot air till the
external face of the building.
Attached updated drawing for your

reference
Item closed.
Noted.
Drawing updated.
Item Closed. Floor standing unit shown.
ICC-1-MEP-CO-PL-103 MEP Services Layout for Service Floor 01
Comment-1
We are concerned that access to the

various plant and equipment will be
severely restricted in a number of
areas. The ductwork is currently
drawing single line which does not
highlight the true extent of the issue. A
detailed section is required and a floor
plan showing access routes for
maintenance.
yes, we understand your concern but with the floor

to floor height of 2 M with structure of 450mm ,
this will have very tight access points, however we
will further detailed out with all section across the
services floor to understand height available.This
will be done at our detail design stage
We await revised drawings and reiterate our

concerns.
We see this as a risk item for the project and
recommend a revised drawing is provided at
Schematic Design stage prior to moving into
Detailed Design.

27.01.15.
Awaiting revised drawings.
drawing.However we have have updated
the old sections adding more services.
Height restriction of 1m will be difficult

to avoid in isolated areas due to
regulatory requirements.
Impact to be minimised at DD stage.
Item closed.
Comment-2

Noted
ICC-1-MEP-CO-PL-103A MEP Section Layout for Service Floor 01
BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Section
Comment
Comment-1
Comment-2
MEPC Reply
B&W Response
The comment does not close out this issue as it

yes , this has been highlited to AHC /BR ,as we have
Fan position blocking escape corridor.
is a major concern.
four access point of which two are blocked with
Also plan shows fans located with one
fans , and we do not have alternative to this
above the other. This is not detailed on
It is recommended to look at alternative
points,this was discussed and agreed in our cosection. Please confirm.
solutions such as locating the fans in the
ordination meeting. .
technical area and not in the corridor.
Not all services shown on section.

Ductwork service missing.
Once the scheme is approved we will updated all

the section in our detailed design.
After we place the fans the area will no

long be passage/corridoor, this will be
part of service space and same has been
agreed and accepted by AHC team.
Drawings reviewed at workshop in

Mumbai 27.01.15.
Awaiting revised drawings to show same.
The current fan location needs to be

agreed with the local CFO at beginning
of DD stage.
We can not approve as based upon the drawings

issued there are some serious co-ordination
issues which require resolution.
Item Closed.
Services now shown on section.
Detailed Design.

27.01.15.
Comment-3
Access past services running at low level

is difficult. Relocate services (i.e.
ductwork) over to the perimeter of the noted we will look into this in our detail design.
service floor to allow better
maintenance access.
This requires review now as if the layout and

arrangement does not work (as currently
appears) then detailed design will be too late to
resolve, particularly if there are Architectural
and Structural implications.

Maintenance route now added to
drawings.
Comment-1

27.01.15.

maintenance.

to floor height of 2 M with stracture of 450mm ,
this will have very tight access points, however we
will further detailed out with all section across the
will be done at our detail design stage

Noted.
We await revised drawings and reiterate our

concerns.
Detailed Design.

drawing.same will be issued by 16th Jan
2015
drawings.
Item closed.
Comment-2
Comment-1

27.01.15.

maintenance.

to floor height of 2 M with stracture of 450mm ,
this will have very tight access points, however we We await revised drawings and reiterate our
will further detailed out with all section across the concerns.
will be done by 15th Dec.

noted

drawing.same will be issued by 16th Jan
2015
drawings.
Item closed.
Comment-2
BR Remarks
MEPC Conclusion
Tucker, William
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dilshad Kotwal <dilshad@hcontractor.com>

Friday, January 23, 2015 7:49 PM
'Vishal Sharma'; Tucker, William
Sperberg, Mark; karl@hcontractor.com; 'Apoorva Sharma'; 'nazeer'; 'Steven Horn'; 'Birju
Patel'
4070_ICC - MEP Schematic Design Deliverable dated 23rd Jan 2015
MEP Comment Tracker_Schematic Comments_ICC 1 2_B&W Comments 23.01.15
(Mechanical)_FINAL.xlsx; MEP Comment Tracker_Schematic Comments_ICC 1 2_B&W
Comments 23.01.15 (Electrical)_FINAL.xlsx; ICC-Dwg.Register for Final schematic Design
stage-(23-1-2015).xls; 150112_MEP Design Deliverable Schedule.pdf
Sub: MEP Schematic Package Deliverable dated 23rd Jan 2015

Dear Vishal & William,
Please find the MEP Schematic Package Deliverable dated 23rd Jan 2015 as per schedule circulated on 13th Jan
2015(attached for your reference).
This submission includes:
1. Complete Schematic Drawings - Please find attached the drawing Transmittal showing the list of all the MEP
Schematic drawings.
As discussed today with Hill, 1 hard copy set will be brought to BR office on 27th Jan 2015. Though all drawings have
been sent by email in parts, we have already couriered a CD containing the entire MEP Schematic drawing package to
Hill International. We will be also carrying the same to BR office on 27th Jan.
2. MEP Schematic Design stage Tracker Sheets - Includes MEPC Co-ordinated service, HVAC, Fire Fighting, Plumbing and
Electrical (Attached to this email).
Kindly note the next milestone is to obtain the client sign-off to the MEP Schematic Design and acquire an "Approval to
proceed to DD stage", which will be discussed on Tuesday, 27th Jan 2015 at the BR office.
Regards,
Dilshad
From: Steven Horn [mailto:SHorn@bw-engineering.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:31 PM
To: Amol More; s.apoorva@hcontractor.com
Cc: Dilshad Kotwal; 'nazeer'; Gavin Wilson
Subject: R10226-ICC-MEP Trackers Final Comments
Dear Karl / Apoorva,

Please find attached our final comments regarding the MEP Schematic Design stage tracker documents.
1
We have used a traffic light system as follows:
Green Item closed.

Amber to be reviewed at DD stage.
No colour item not closed/to be discussed with Client during MEP workshop next week.
I am available tomorrow to discuss any of the attached should you have any queries or comments prior to issuing the
consolidated comments to the Client and Hill International.
Kind regards,
Steven Horn
Abu Dhabi | Baku | Dubai | Manila | Newcastle

t: +44 (0) 191 230 0206
t: +44 (0) 191 230 0406
m: +44 (0) 7880 731 031
http://www.bw-engineering.com
This email, its contents and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient please destroy this email immediately and notify
the sender by return. We take reasonable precautions to ensure our emails are virus free however, we cannot accept responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and
recommend that you employ your own virus checking procedures.
Black & White Engineering Limited

Unit 2.8, First Floor
Generator Studios
Trafalgar Street
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 2LA
T + 44 (0) 191 230 0206
28 January 2015
Mr. Vishal Sharma, SR. VP

Bombay Realty
Wadia International Center
Worli
Mumbai
India
Dear Vishal,
Reference:
ICC Tower One and Two, MEP Schematic Design
The following brief summary report identifies the MEP items discussed during our workshop in Mumbai on 27th
and 28th January 2015.
Please also refer to the Hill International letter dated 28th January 2015 and supporting documents.
The MEP Schematic Design Package is generally approvable with comments and we recommend that MEPC
proceed to Detailed Design.
Yours sincerely,
Steven Horn
Director
shorn@bw-engineering.com
Page 1 of 10
ONE & TWO ICC

DADAR, MUMBAI
SCHEMATIC DESIGN MEP REVIEW
27th & 28th January 2015
Page 2 of 10
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STATUS
The schematic design drawings were reviewed at various stages in accordance with the key
dates at the end of this report. Included at the end of this report is the drawing register of the
latest drawings reviewed by B&W.
Schematic Design Package is generally approvable with comments (refer to comments

highlighted on drawings and tracker).
In order to fill in the missing parts (Penthouses, Clubhouse, Podium Landscaping, Faade
Lighting and Specialist Consultants) to Schematic Design, appointment of Sub-Consultants is
required refer to information required at end of report.
Penthouse layouts to be confirmed / approved by Owner.
Page 3 of 10
KEY COMMENTS DISCUSSED DURING MEP WORKSHOP 27/01/2015
CO-ORDINATION
Car park ventilation and shaft co-ordination through podium swimming pool location to be
provided by landscape consultant within 4 weeks and shafts co-ordinated.
Car park headroom and co-ordination of jet fans AHC confirmed achieved 2.35m is acceptable
under local code requirements. This refers to Levels B2 and B3.
Fire shaft locations (basement areas) marked up drawings identifying new locations to be
submitted as part of RFA to B&W and updated during detailed design.
Service floor and access restrictions (Service Floor 1) height restriction of 1m will be difficult to
avoid in isolated areas due to regulatory requirements.
TATA Substation (transformer size, layout, ventilation requirements). MEPC now have TATA
layout and are to reflect on DD drawings to ensure space is adequately sized.
Columns
restricting access via roller shutters to be moved.
Generator removal and replacement. AHC to show roller shutters (fire rated) to enable removal
via car park.
Electrical shaft (apartment busbar and metering). MEPC confirmed shaft is approved by TATA
and metering will be shown at DD stage.
MEPC confirmed cables have been identified as worst case and will confirm cable sizing
calculations at DD stage.
Central gas system not included (considered more than 12 months ago). Individual cylinders
currently provided per apartment. Can be considered at Detailed Design stage.
Page 4 of 10
Swimming pool is currently not heated.
HVAC
Condensing unit CFD. MEPC have received comments from vendor and are replying. To be
completed at beginning of DD.
Car park CFD. Contractor to try and request vendor to undertake or Client to appoint. This is to
mitigate associated risk with shaft locations prior to them being constructed. Recommended by
B&W.
Fresh air to be treated via connection to back of fan coils units. MEPC to undertake
pyschrometric analysis and ensure fan coil unit cooling coils are sized correctly.
Fresh air provision to bedrooms. Arup faade/acoustic engineer to comment regarding wind
pressure, velocity and potential noise issues. 25% concern with natural ventilation proposal at
higher floors. Solution available should fresh air be provided to bedrooms but will impact ceiling
heights.
Acoustic consultant appointment (number of issues to resolve, refer to information required).
The draft CFO NOC with comments by AHC/MEPC/B&W are currently being followed in design.
Note: Those comments (issued 23/01/15) have not been incorporated in the final draft as
informed by BR Regulatory. AHC to submit a list of items that cannot be complied with for BR to
apply for revised NOC.
Pressurisation fan locations and NFPA enclosure requirement. Not a local requirement and
implications to provide.
Cooling/ventilation to electrical rooms. To be developed during DD.
Page 5 of 10
Apartment service riser co-ordination. Structural core wall has been modified with recess where
shafts are located.
Fire rated ductwork required for all pressurization systems.
PLUMBING
Water sample and analysis report. Client to confirm when this will be undertaken.
Letter from STP vendor (connection to kitchen waste) to be provided to confirm if any additional
maintenance or reduced life expectancy anticipated.
Calculations for sizing of pipework (drainage and water services). MEPC to submit at
commencement of DD.
FIRE
All design team comments as issued on draft CFO NOC (23rd January 2015) are currently being
followed and will form part of Detailed Design.
Drencher system to all floors (specified by NOC guidelines but not identified with current NOC).
To be retained but potential to omit in future.
Page 6 of 10
ELECTRICAL
Maximum demand calculation and transformer sizing. MEPC/BR team confirmed TATA have
approved and it is in accordance with local diversity requirements.
Main and sub-main cable sizing. To be provided at DD stage.
Lighting calculations. To be room specific for all areas and to be provided at DD stage.
Electrical shaft design and sizing. MEPC confirmed shaft is approved by TATA and cable sizing
is based upon worst case.
Main switchboard construction to be agreed. B&W recommend Form 4, Type 6. Cost

implication to be presented as beyond BOQ.
Busbar MEPC confirmed they will proceed with busbar fully rated across length. Cost
Earthing MEPC confirmed DD will be based upon one common metal (aluminum). Cost
FLS alternative route required under NFPA. Electrical shaft to be increased to accommodate.
FSI impact discussed with Client 28.01.15. Ref 8(viii) of CFO NOC.
Consider electrical kitchen provision for future increases.
Page 7 of 10
SUGGESTED TIMELINE OF INFORMATION REQUIRED TO

COMPLETE DETAILED DESIGN AS DISCUSSED 28/01/15
MEPC to provide list of information required from specialist Sub-Consultants yet to be appointed
(1-2 weeks (mid-February).
Appointment of Sub-Consultants (2-4 weeks (end February)) acoustics, landscaping, interior

designer (including Apartment and Penthouse layouts), faade lighting, AV/IT/Security/BMS/,
infrastructure.
March input from all consultants to be scoped and acknowledged in DD. Sub-Consultant
concept/schematic input to be submitted by end of March (4-8 weeks).
NOTE: ABOVE IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER CONFIRMATION

WITH CONSULTANT AND BR/REFER CURRENT MEP
DESIGN PROGRAMME AT END OF THIS REPORT.
Page 8 of 10
KEY DATES DURING SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW

PROCESS
Key Dates (HVAC/Plumbing/Fire Fighting):
Schematic Design Package Received 11/11/2014 and 14/11/2014.
Tracker with initial B&W comments issued 28/11/2014.
Initial comments from MEPC on Tracker received 09/12/2014.
Updated drawings incorporating comments raised on tracker received 15-16/12/2014.
B&W comments issued 18/12/2014 and 24/12/2014.
MEPC final schematic design drawings received 16-17/01/2015.
Final B&W comments issued 22/01/2015.
Comments issued to Client team 23/01/2015.
27/01/15 Review presentation.
28/01/15 Review Close Out discussion with BR
28/01/15 RFA letter included all Review documentation submitted to BR

(NOTE: BR approval requested for finalisation by 30 January 2015)
Page 9 of 10
Key Dates (Electrical):
Electrical Schematic Design Package Received 25/11/2014.
Load Assessment & Lighting calculations received 04/12/2014.
Tracker with initial comments issued 09/12/2014.
Initial comments from MEPC on Tracker received 24/12/2014.
Updated drawings incorporating comments raised on tracker received 09/01/2015.
Final comments on updated Schematic Design package issue 22/01/2015.
Comments issued to Client team 23/01/2015.
27/01/15 Review presentation.
28/01/15 Review Close Out discussion with BR
28/01/15 RFA letter included all Review documentation submitted to BR

(NOTE: BR approval requested for finalisation by 30 January 2015)
Page 10 of 10
Project: IslandCityCentre
One&TwoICC
12.01.2015
MEPDESIGNDELIVERABLESCHEDULE(Mechanical,Electrical,Plumbing&FireFighting)
Date
Closed
Description
ConceptDesign
Duration
16thJan2015
SchematicDesign(MEPCEtoBW)
MEPCEtosubmitcompleteMEPSchematicDesignsettoBWincorporatingallBW
commentsreceivedinJan2015.
23rdJan2015
30thJan2015
(MEPCE&BW)tojointlysubmittoBRacompleteMEPSchematicDesignpackagefor
"ApprovaltoproceedtoDD".Submissiontoinclude:
1.CompleteSchematicDrawings
2.Trackersheets(withagreed/openitems)
3.MEPSchematicReport
"ApprovaltoproceedtoDD"fromBR(withcommentsifany).
1week
27thMarch2015
DDwithTechnicalspecifications(MEPCEtoBW)incorporatingabovecommentsbyBR.
8weeks
10thApril2015
CutoffdateforBW'sapprovalonTenderSpecification(withcomments/suggestionsifany). 2weeks
15thApril2015
SubmissionofMEPFTenderDocuments(MEPCEtoAHC,AHCtoHill)
(notincorporatingDDCommentsfromBW).
17thApril2015
DDPeerReview(BWtoMEPCE).
30thApril2015
FinalDDSubmission(MEPCEtoBW)forBWapproval.
2weeks
10
8thMay2015
(MEPCE&BW)tojointlysubmittoBRacompleteMEPDDpackagefor"Approvalto
proceedtoFinalTenderAddendum".Submissiontoinclude:
1.CompleteDDDrawings
2.Trackersheets(withagreed/openitems)
3.MEPReport
1weeks
11
22ndMay2015
"ApprovaltoproceedtoFinalTenderAddendum"fromclient(withcommentsifany).
2week
12
29thMay2015
TenderAddendum01(MEPCEtoAHCandAHCtoHILL)
1week
13
15thJuly2015
CutoffdateforanychangesasresultofTendernegotiations/ValueEngineeringas
suggestedbyvendorsandacceptedbyBR/Hill/MEPCE/BW.Sameshallbesubmittedto
AHC/MEPtoincorporatethechangesinapointwisemanner.
(Thisnextdeliverableshallattractabortiveworkchargesifapplicable).
7weeks
14
15thAug2015
TenderAddendum02
(RevisedTenderdocumentstoenableL&TcommencepreparationofShopDrawings).
4.5weeks
15
DatebyL&T
AppointedSubcontractor'ssubmissionofShopdrawingsforapproval.
16
Approvalofshopdrawingswillbedoneasfollows:
Oneweek(5working Ifdrawingsaresubmittedfloorwise.
days)
Sixweeks
Ifdrawingsaresubmittedaslumpsumfortheproject.
Note:
1
2
Abovescheduleisvalidfordisciplinesof(Mechanical,Electrical,PlumbingandFireFighting)only.
Abovescheduledoesnottakeintoconsideration:
AV/IT
BMS
Waterbodies&Waterfeatures
Landscape/Irrigation
Security
Acoustic
Faade,Landscape&InteriorLighting
PenthouseFloors(alldisciplinesseparateschedulewillbedeveloped.
AnychangesthatmayariseafterreceiptofFinalCFONOC.
ForArchitectHafeezContractor
DRAWING REGISTER
Project : ISLAND CITY CENTRE (ICC)
Job Number : R-314
Discipline : PLUMBING
Date : 27.01.2015
Sr.
N0.
Sheet Title
27-01-2015
No of Copy
Rev
DWG No
16-01-2015
Description
31/12/2014
10-Nov-2014
Date of Issue
Scale
No
HC
SOFT
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
B. SCHEME DESIGN STAGE (SD Stage)

ICC - 1 LAYOUTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-102
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-102A
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-103
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-104
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-105
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-110
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-111
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-112
DRAINAGE SERVICES LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

WATER SUPPLY SERVICES LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR LOWER PENTHOUSE FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR TERRACE FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT UNDER GROUND WATER TANK
9
10
11
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-050
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-051
ICC1-MEP-PL-PL-052
SCHEMATIC FOR WATER SUPPLY

SCHEMATIC FOR DRAINAGE
SCHEMATIC FOR RAIN WATER
12
13
14
15
16
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-102
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-102A
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-103
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-104
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-105
17
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-110
18
19
20
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-111
ICC12-MEP-PL-PL-112
ICC12-MEP-PL-PL-113
DRAINAGE SERVICES LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

WATER SUPPLY SERVICES LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-3 FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR LOWER PENTHOUSE FLOOR(
DRAWING DELETED)
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR TERRACE FLOOR
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR REFUGE FLOOR(DRAWING DELETED )
PLUMBING LAYOUT FOR LMR LEVEL
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
ICC - 1 SCHEMATICS
ICC - 2 LAYOUTS
R0
R0
ICC - 2 SCHEMATICS
17
18
19
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-050
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-051
ICC2-MEP-PL-PL-052
SCHEMATIC FOR WATER SUPPLY

SCHEMATIC FOR DRAINAGE
SCHEMATIC FOR RAIN WATER
R0
R0
R0
DRAWING REGISTER
Job Number : R-314
Discipline : FIRE FIGHTING
Date : 27.01.2015
Sr.
N0.
Sheet Title
27-01-2015
No of Copy
Rev
DWG No
16-1-2015
Description
31-12-2014
10-Nov-2014
Date of Issue
Scale
No
HC
SOFT

ICC - 1 LAYOUTS
COMMON AREA LAYOUTS
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-097
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-102
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-103
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-104
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-105
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-106
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-107
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-108
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-109
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR 2RD BASEMENT FLOOR(

PART PLAN)
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR REFUGE FLOORS
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR FIRE CHECK FLOORS
OH FIRE PUMP LOCATION DRAWING
OH FIRE TANK LOCATION DRAWING
10
ICC1-MEP-FF-PL-050
SCHEMATIC FOR FIRE FIGHTING
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
ICC - 1 SCHEMATICS
ICC - 2 LAYOUTS
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-102
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-103
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-104
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-105
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-106
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-107
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-108
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-109
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-3 FLOOR
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR REFUGE FLOORS
FIRE FIGHTING LAYOUT FOR FIRE CHECK FLOORS
OH FIRE PUMP LOCATION DRAWING
OH FIRE TANK LOCATION DRAWING
19
ICC2-MEP-FF-PL-050
SCHEMATIC FOR FIRE FIGHTING

FIRE FIGTING PUMP SELECTION CALCULATION
R0
R0
R0
R0
ICC - 2 SCHEMATICS
R0
DRAWING REGISTER
Job Number : R-314
Discipline : MEP SERVICES CO-ORDINATED DRAWINGS
Date : 27.01.2015
Sr.
N0.
Rev
DWG No
Sheet Title
Scale
27-01-2015
Description
16-01-2015
10-Nov-2014
Date of Issue
No of Copy
Date
No
HC
SOFT
10-Nov-14
R0
R1
R1
10-Nov-14
R0
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0

COMMON AREA LAYOUTS
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-097
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-097A
3
4
5
6
7
8
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-098
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-098A
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-099
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-099A
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-100
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-100A
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-101
10
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-102
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 3RD BASEMENT FLOOR

MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 3RD BASEMENT CEILING DWG(
DRAWING DELETED)
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 2ND BASEMENT FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 2ND BASEMENT CEILING DWG
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 1ST BASEMENT FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 1ST BASEMENT CEILING DWG
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR CEILING
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR PODIUM FLOOR DRAWING (
DRAWING DELETED)
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR PART 2ND BASEMENT
ICC - 1 LAYOUTS
11
12
13
14
15
16
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-102
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-102A
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-103
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-103A
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-104
ICC1-MEP-CO-PL-105
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

MEP SERVICES PART SECTION LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
MEP SERVICES PART SECTION LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
MEP SERVICES LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-3 FLOOR
17
18
19
20
21
ICC2-MEP-CO-PL-102
ICC2-MEP-CO-PL-102A
ICC2-MEP-CO-PL-103
ICC2-MEP-CO-PL-104
ICC2-MEP-CO-PL-105
MEP SERVICES
MEP SERVICES
MEP SERVICES
MEP SERVICES
MEP SERVICES
22
ICC-MEP-CO-PL-201
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R0
ICC - 2 LAYOUTS
LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

PART SECTION LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-3 FLOOR
MEP SERVICES STARDARD SUPPORT DETAILS
DRAWING REGISTER
Job Number : R-314
Discipline : HVAC
Date : 27.01.2015
Sr.
N0.
DWG No
Sheet Title
Scale
Date
27/01/2015( final
SD Pacakage)
Description
16-Jan-2015
10-Nov-2014
Date of Issue
Rev
Date
No
Rev
No of Copy
No
HC

COMMON AREA LAYOUTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-097
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-098
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-098A
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-099
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-099A
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-100
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-100A
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 3RD BASEMENT FLOOR

HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 2ND BASEMENT FLOOR
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 2ND BASEMENT CEILING DWG
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 1ST BASEMENT FLOOR
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR 1ST BASEMENT CEILING DWG
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR CEILING DWG
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
ICC-MEP-ME-PL-101
HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR PODIUM FLOOR CEILING DWG
10-Nov-14
R0
16-Jan-15
R1
R2
R2
R2
R2
R2
R2
R2
R2
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
10-Nov-14
R0
R0
R0
R0
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
16-Jan-15
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
ICC - 1 LAYOUTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-100
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-101
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-102
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-103
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-104
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-105

HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR PODIUM FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
7
8
9
10
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-050
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-051
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-052
ICC1-MEP-ME-PL-053
SCHEMATIC FOR LIFT CORE PRESSURIZATION

SCHEMATIC FOR LIFTLOBBY PRESSURIZATION
SCHEMATIC FOR STAIRCASE RESSURIZATION
SCHEMATIC FOR TOILET EXHAUST
1
2
3
4
5
6
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-100
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-101
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-102
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-103
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-104
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-105

HVAC SERVICES LAYOUT FOR PODIUM FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-2FLOOR
HVAC LAYOUT LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-3 FLOOR
7
8
9
10
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-050
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-051
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-052
ICC2-MEP-ME-PL-053
SCHEMATIC FOR LIFT CORE PRESSURIZATION

SCHEMATIC FOR LIFTLOBBY PRESSURIZATION
SCHEMATIC FOR STAIRCASE RESSURIZATION
SCHEMATIC FOR TOILET EXHAUST
ICC - 1 SCHEMATICS
ICC - 2 LAYOUTS
ICC - 2 SCHEMATICS
SOFT
DRAWING REGISTER
Project Name
One & Two ICC, Dadar - Mumbai
Ref No
From
MEP Consulting Engineers (MEPCE)
Date
To
B & W / Hill International / BR
Discipline
R314-EL-SD-01
27.01.2015
Electrical Schematic Design Package
09.01.2015
16 / 17.01.2015
23.01.2015
FINAL
PACKAGE
27.01.2015
HC SC
OLD NOS.
REVISED NOS.
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-097
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-098
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-099
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-100
ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR 3RD BASEMENT FLOOR

ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR 2ND BASEMENT FLOOR
ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR 1ST BASEMENT FLOOR
ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR GROUND FLOOR
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R2
-
R1
R1
R2
R1
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-101
HIGH END ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENTS SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT @

GROUND & BASEMENT-1 FLOOR
R0
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R1
R0
R1
R2
R2
R0
R1
R1
R0
R0
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R1
R1
DRAWING NAME
LAYOUTS
OLD NOS.
REVISED NOS.
R-314-ICC-ONE-EL-101
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A101
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A102
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A103
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A104
ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR SERVICE-1 FLOOR
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-A105
ELECTRICAL SHAFT LAYOUT @ SERVICE - 1,2,3 @ TYPICAL FLOOR
10
OLD NOS.
REVISED NOS.
11
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A151
12
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A152
13
R-314-ICC-ONE-EL-152A
13
R-314-ICC-ONE-EL-152B
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A153
14
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A153A
15
MEP-EL-SLD-A154
16
R-314-ICC-ONE-FAPA-151
MEP-EL (FAPA)-SD-SLD-A155
17
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-A156
OLD NOS.
REVISED NOS.
18
19
20
21
22
R-314-ICC-TWO-EL-101
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-B101
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-B102
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-B103
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-B104
MEP-EL-SD-DWG-B105
OLD NOS.
REVISED NOS.
23
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B151
24
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B152
Remark
ICC ONE - LAYOUTS
ICC ONE - SCHEMATICS
EARTHING SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-ONE

ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION SCHEMATIC FOR
COMMON AREA LOADS ICC-ONE
L.T. METER SCHEMATIC FOR APARTMENTS ICC-ONE
( APT. METERS AT SERVICES FLRS. - OPTIONAL)
DWG. REMOVED FROM PACKAGE AS SCHEME OVER-RULED.
L.T. METER SCHEMATIC FOR APARTMENTS ICC-ONE
(APT.METERS PER FLR)
DB DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY FOR ICC-ONE
AVAITIONAL LIGHTING SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-ONE
REVIEW / COMMENTS / CONFIRMATION
Drawing Number
6
7
8
9
Nos. of
Copies
R-314-ICC-EL-001
R-314-ICC-EL-002
R-314-ICC-EL-003
R-314-ICC-EL-004
Sr.
N0.
1
2
3
4
Drawing Issue Date
25.11.2014
DESCRIPTION
R0
R1
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
-
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R0
R1
R2
R2
R0
R1
R1
L.T. METER SCHEMATIC FOR APARTMENTS ICC-TWO

( APT. METERS AT SERVICES FLRS. - OPTIONAL)
DWG. REMOVED FROM PACKAGE AS SCHEME OVER-RULED.
R0
L.T. METER SCHEMATIC FOR APARTMENTS ICC-TWO

(APT.METERS PER FLR)
R0
R1
R1
FAPA SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-ONE

LIGHTNING PROTECTION SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-ONE
ICC TWO - LAYOUTS
ELECTRICAL SPACE PLANNING LAYOUT FOR TYPICAL FLOOR

ELECTRICAL SHAFT LAYOUT @ SERVICE - 1,2,3 @ TYPICAL FLOOR
ICC TWO - SCHEMATICS
EARTHING SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-TWO

ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION SCHEMATIC FOR
COMMON AREA LOADS ICC-TWO
25
25
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B153
26
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B153A
DB DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY FOR ICC-TWO
R0
R0
27
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B154
AVAITIONAL LIGHTING SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-TWO
R0
R1
R1
28
R-314-ICC-ONE-FAPA-151
MEP-EL (FAPA)-SD-SLD-B155
FAPA SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-TWO
R0
R1
R1
29
MEP-EL-SD-SLD-B156
LIGHTNING PROTECTION SCHEMATIC FOR ICC-TWO
R0
R0
R1_Electrical SD Stage Drawing Register_BR.
5 of 5

Rev 1 As Revised and Issued d09-Pmc-br-064 Mep SD Submittal Rfa

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rev 1 As Revised and Issued d09-Pmc-br-064 Mep SD Submittal Rfa

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hill International Project

Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Mr Vishal Sharma (Sr. VP)

ICC Phase 1 - One ICC & Two ICC

MEP Schematic Design Submittal Request for Approval

Peer Review Consultant

MEPC Reply as per Remarks

Comments Remaining from Concept Stage

All switchrooms, electrical rooms, DB

Whilst spaces are identified for various items of

High End Electrical Equipment Space

LT meters located on the service floors

Electrical Shaft Layout at Service 1, 2 &

Some landlord cables run vertically for

Electrical Shaft Layout at Service 1, 2 &

Please provide date for release of updated

BR Remarks MEPC Conclusion

Peer Review Consultant

This requires urgent resolution as implications

Authority Approvals Consultant to confirm if

The following systems and associated

SDB-UPS for ICC-1 serves DB's for

MEPC Reply as per Remarks

Conceptual sizing of worse case busbars,

MEPC to show generic riser and electrical room

Electrical Shaft Layout at Service 1, 2 &

BR Remarks MEPC Conclusion

Peer Review Consultant

There are no Supply Authority

Please check this statement (2,500m max loop

Aircraft warning lights to follow

Ok, revised dwgs will be issued shortly.

Please provide date for release of updated

Please confirm if the supply company have

Client required to appoint

MEPC Reply as per Remarks

Revised drawing shows additional

Aviation Lighting Schematic for ICC-1

Client required to appoint

Schematic Design Stage Comments

This means the transformers are not sized for

Transformer sizing for landlord area

The current calculation for transformer sizing

Is this acceptable to Tata and if so please

Maximum demand calculation and

Maximum demand calculation and

BR Remarks MEPC Conclusion

Peer Review Consultant

MEPC Reply as per Remarks

Generators shall be sized to meet minimum life

Please provide more detailed breakdown of

Additional detail on miscellaneous

It appears these allowances are for the intake

Allowances appear to be for the intake

Lift core pressurization fans are also

Noted & will be incorporated.

Please provide date for release of updated

Load details of lift core pressurization

The emergency lighting calculation

Please provide updated calculations to reflect

Detailed general and emergency

Please provide updated calculations to reflect

Please provide updated calculations to