Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAC.APP.No.13/2007
..... Appellant
versus
FARZANA ORS.
..... Respondents
YES
YES
3.
YES
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1.
learned Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.3,62,500/has been awarded to the appellants.
MAC .APP.No.13/2007
Page 1 of 15
2.
The
Rs.5,000/-
each
has
been
awarded
towards
Vehicles
Act
provides
for
notional
income
of
judgment is reproduced hereunder:As set out in the Second Schedule to the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, for a boy of 13 years of
age, a multiplier of 15 would have to be
applied. As per the Second Schedule, he
being a non-earning person, a sum of
Rs.15,000/- must be taken as the income.
Thus, the compensation comes to
Rs.2,25,000/-
5.
MAC .APP.No.13/2007
Page 3 of 15
7.
With respect to
non-pecuniary
compensation.
8.
The Honble
towards
future
prospects.
The
Honble
claimants
Rs.2,25,000/-.
are
The
entitled
to
claimants
loss
are
of
dependency
also
entitled
of
to
the case of R.K. Malik Vs. Kiran Pal, III (2006) ACC 261
upheld by the Honble Supreme Court.
The
learned
Tribunal
has
awarded
sum
of
13.
vacated.
J.R. MIDHA, J
MAC .APP.No.13/2007
Page 15 of 15