Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ESTD Newsletter
GRAPHIC DESIGN/
FRANK MYKLESTAD
ORIT BADOUK-EPSTEIN
MARTIN DORAHY
WINJA LUTZ
DOLORES MOSQUERA
ANTONIO ONOFRI
JENNY ANN RYDBERG
VALERIE SINAISON
ONNO VAN DER HART
ESTD NEWSLETTER
Co-editors: Dolores Mosquera, Onno van der Hart, Orit Badouk-Epstein.
Table of contents
2
3
4
13
16
19
25
28
35
ESTD Newsletter
QUARTERLY QUOTE
ESTD Newsletter
Eva Zimmermann
ESTD President
To help realize some of the visions of ESTD and to act in the same manner as our Timisoara
colleagues, I invite all members and country representatives (see list at the end of this newsletter)
to organize local meetings and conferences, to give interviews to the media and to talk with
colleagues about chronic traumatization and dissociation. On the one hand, this helps you to
connect and to grow as a community in your region or country. On the other hand, you help ESTD to
promote and to increase the knowledge among professionals and the general population. Victims
of chronic traumatization, violence, abuse and neglect need to know that psychotherapeutic help
and overcoming trauma-related disorders is possible. To be able to do this they must be able to
find and meet their therapists! So they must find you! For any planned activity, do not hesitate to
contact ESTD (info@estd.org) so we can announce your event on our website and support you
wherever it is possible.
I would also like to point out that our next conference in Amsterdam from April 14-16, 2016 is now
calling for abstracts. We are sure that our Amsterdam conference set in a wonderful venue will
be a big success. To promote discussions and exchange, it would be great if new colleagues would
be willing to submit their conference abstract. Keep the date to make sure you will be there! It will
be a wonderful opportunity to learn more about research and clinical implications about chronic
traumatization and dissociative disorders and to meet people and colleagues from your own or
from other European countries and other continents. Dont miss it! .
Professional exchange and personal meetings are always the best way to connect and as you all
surely agree, are much richer than email and skype contacts.
Looking forward to meeting you!
Warmly
Eva Zimmermann
ESTD President
ESTD Newsletter
TO DISSOCIATE OR NOT TO
DISSOCIATE An exploration
mothers emotion and the childs reported behaviour. After a brief heavy silence, the adoptive father says
how irritated he is by the school that keeps telling them that they have the most polite and considerate
son! He continues to explain how they as parents have to listen to hours of shouting and abuse from their
child, when in the next moment there is a sudden change and he becomes a child who wants a hug and
their attention. This, the adoptive father added is beyond what we can do at the time as we are so angry
and hurt after listening to all the abuse.
ESTD Newsletter
A conversation with the teacher does indeed reveal a model pupil who is an example to his peers within
the school environment. The teacher also goes as far as expressing in confidence that she and some of
the other teachers are concerned about the parents inability to deal with the child whom they consider
as lacking parenting skills.
As a therapist, this type of dichotomy between what parents experience in the home and teachers
experience at school is certainly not unfamiliar, and many, many years ago, as a less experienced therapist,
it may have been enough to make me doubt my own assessment of the child and family, question the
parents, and feel confused about what to do next. From my current position, as a much more experienced
therapist, with a more informed understanding of trauma and dissociation in children and how to work
with it, I now know that this presentation of a child in one setting as the ideal child and in the other as the
monster child is very typical of dissociative children. The stark reality is that this varied presentation
is not limited to school and home, but can also occur between school and home on the one side and family
members and professionals on the other side. The varied presentation of the child can also change from
moment to moment in the same setting. The adults surrounding the child are often left feeling confused
about the childs change in presentation or uncertain about the unpredictable behaviour and what to do
about it.
In training and supervising therapists who work with children who have experienced complex trauma
and display dissociative features, I often find a level of uncertainty about whether a child has significant
dissociation that needs to be addressed during therapy or whether the therapist should ignore the often
very obvious symptoms of dissociation. The struggle to determine whether it actually is dissociation
they are facing and not knowing how to deal with it, leaves them uncertain and doubting their skills.
The identification of signs or symptoms of dissociation in children in order to ascertain its presence
is further complicated if the therapist does not see the many signs or symptoms that are present in
the therapy room. Hornstein in Silberg (1996) wrote about children with dissociation that they . as a
group are uniquely presenting to the mental health system as polysymptomatic, traumatized children with
difficult behavior problems (Bowman, Blix, & Coons, 1985: Dell & Eisenhower, 1990; Fagan & McMahon,
1984; Hornstein & Putnam, 1992; Hornstein & Tyson, 1991; Kluft, 1984; Malenbaun and Russel, 1987;
Peterson, 1990; Riley & Mead, 1988; Vincent & Pickering, 1988; Weiss, Sutton & Utrecht, 1985) and as
challenging both to diagnostic acumen and to therapeutic expertise. In 1997, Putnam compiled symptom
clusters in pathological dissociation. These included amnesia, fugue episodes, perplexing fluctuations
in skills, habits and knowledge, fragmentary autobiographical recall, difficulty in determining the source
of recalled information, difficulty in remembering whether remembered experiences actually occurred
and dissociative flashbacks, depersonalization, derealisation, passive influence/interference experiences,
dissociative auditory hallucinations, trance-like states, alter personality states, switching behavior and
dissociative thought disorder .
There is no doubt that detecting dissociative symptoms in children continues to be a challenge for the
therapist. It requires an increasing knowledge base, advanced training, experience in working with these
children and effective clinical supervision to enable the therapist to identify dissociation in children and
adolescents more effectively. The challenge that dissociative children and adolescents can present in the
therapy room might also be one of the reasons why therapists might struggle to identify the dissociation.
This population of children and adolescents has the capacity to leave the therapist confused, anxious, and
at times even feeling unskilled. Managing the transference and countertransference in the room might also
at times be more important in the moment than actually identifying that the child is displaying significant
dissociative features.
Another concern is that a significant number of children, like James, appear to present in the therapy
room as the ANP (Apparently Normal part of the Personality). Van der Hart, Nijenhuis & Steele (2006)
ESTD Newsletter
state, The patient as ANP consciously and unconsciously avoids stimuli related to traumatic memories
(i.e., ANP is phobic to traumatic memories and related stimuli; see chapter 10). This evasion maintains
and strengthens amnesia, anesthesia and emotional constriction. This avoidance is not a goal in itself,
but assists the survivor as ANP to engage in daily life by excluding what seems too difficult to integrate.
This leads therapists who are unfamiliar with dissociation or the presentation of the ANP in children with
complex trauma, to be more easily persuaded that the child they see is the real child and so they never
see any difficult behaviour while the parents or school continue to report and struggle with extreme
behavioural difficulties. Due to the capacity of the ANP to avoid memories and stimuli related to the
trauma, the child is likely to avoid all toys, questions and interaction that will encourage this connection
in the therapy room. This repeated process may potentially waste many hours of precious therapy time
and finances and can lead to a culture where blaming parents and caregivers becomes the only logical
option as the child is cooperating very well with the therapist. It appears that this scenario is much more
prevalent in unstructured therapy where the child takes the lead and where the parent is not involved in
the therapy process.
Other children might at times in the therapy room display the ANP, and then suddenly make space for one
or various EPs (Emotional parts of the Personality) to appear. This change, referred to as switching, is
often easier to work with when it is observed in therapy. Van der Hart et al. (2006) state: There may be
complex mixtures of ANP and EP in very fragmented patients. Children who are abused and neglected
by their caretakers in early childhood with maltreatment constituting a substantial part of daily life, will
probably have particular difficulty in developing normative daily life systems. As the presentation of this
group of children can be particularly challenging in the therapy room, the focus is often inevitably placed
on containing or managing the childs behaviour rather than seeing this as possible dissociation in the
child. Wieland (2011) refers to Behavioural changes, Emotional shifts and Cognitive shifts that might
be observed by the therapist. Wieland indicated that behavioural changes might include a sudden change
in how the child acts or behaves for instance suddenly regresses or becomes aggressive while the child
would normally not display these behaviours. Emotional shifts refer to moving rapidly from one emotion
to another without the intermediate stages that are apparent in most children (Wieland, 2011). Wieland
includes signs of amnesia, variable performance where the child is able to do an assignment well on one
day, but unable to do it the next day and hearing voices or noises as part of the Cognitive shifts.
Silberg (2013) identified Five Classes of Symptoms Related to Dissociation.
They are:
Perplexing shifts of consciousness, i.e., feeling in a fog, momentary lapses of consciousness, flashback
states;
Vivid hallucinatory experiences, i.e., hearing voices, seeing imaginary entities, or vivid imaginary
friends;
Marked fluctuation in knowledge, moods or patterns of behaviour and relating, i.e., feeling that moods
have a mind of their own, and skills and abilities are inconsistent, and the sense of self is divided;
Perplexing memory lapses for ones own behaviour and recently experienced events, i.e., cannot
remember behaviour, cannot remember assignments.
Abnormal somatic experiences, i.e., self-harming behaviours, pain sensitivity, bowel or bladder
incontinence.
Another challenge is that many of the other symptoms of dissociation are not consistently present in
all areas of the childs life and often not seen in therapy. For instance, amnesia is often disguised as I
have forgotten or I dont know or even look, a spider to distract the therapist. It might appear to be
suggestive of resistance to the question. Amnesic barriers between dissociative states can be present
ESTD Newsletter
to the eye of the more experienced therapist, but might be missed by the therapist who has just started to
work in this field. Derealisation might appear like normal fantasy combined with a need to repetitively play
a particular game during therapy.
In practice it appears that in the assessment process, it might be critically important to obtain a very
comprehensive picture of the child, rather than to only trust the childs information or minimalistic signs
of dissociation. Information from parents/caregivers, and from school and grandparents/family/friends,
if they act as substitute caregiveers of the child, is important. Information about the presentation of the
child and its behaviours from the adults perspective, combined with the clinical assessment completed by
the therapist, are invaluable in providing a comprehensive picture of the child. In practice it is helpful to get
the CDC (Child Dissociative Checklist) completed by both the parents/caregivers and the adult at the school
who knows the child best. It is not unusual that both CDCs will provide significant dissociative scores, but
it is also not unusual that there will be different presentations at school than at home. For instance, the
school often reports the child going into a trance-like state or daydreaming, forgetfulness and variation in
skills, while parents are often exposed to the childs poor sense of time, rapid age regression or baby talk,
experience lying, switching, changes in voice and face, while it is possible that only the therapist at a much
later stage might find that the child also hears voices and has imaginary friends. This information is mostly
obtained by asking a direct question to the child, and is seldom spontaneously disclosed. It is possible that
the process of identifying dissociation in children and adolescents might at least initially be similar to that of
a forensic detective who has to find clues from various sources in order to build up the most comprehensive
and complete picture before making a final finding.
The clinician needs to be aware of the difference in expectations between a child who has experienced
complex trauma or dissociation and a child of the same age who has not. An understanding of child
development and an ability to explore the internal world of the child assists enormously in the process of
analysing the behaviours of the dissociative child more accurately.
The following case studies illustrate how some of the typical symptoms found in the literature present
themselves in the therapy room.
Case 1: Lying
Michael is a 9-year-old boy who is totally unable to cope with the fact that he is involved in unacceptable
behaviour at school and consistently denies it. Michael displays aggressive behaviour towards his peers at
school but obviously has a significant problem and might be using some form of dissociation to disconnect
the ideal self from the self who is executing the unacceptable behaviour on a regular basis. During a
comprehensive assessment of 9-year-old Michael, he was asked whether he has any special friends that
nobody knows about. Without hesitation, Michael explained that Angry Michael was living in his head and
that he was the one who was hitting children at school. Michael again confirmed that it was not he hitting
the children, but it was Angry Michael. Although Michael has had significant therapeutic input from other
professionals, this information had not previously been disclosed. Unless this question is directly asked, it
appears that the chance of getting this information might be similar to that of winning the lottery. Michael
perceived the problem of children getting hurt at school as that of Angry Michael and as such he, Michael,
did not need to own the responsibility for it.
This problem was relatively easily addressed as Michael decided to ask Angry Michael to go to a special
room where he could watch TV and eat biscuits while he, the 9-year-old Michael would still attend school. The
parents reminded Michael each morning to make sure that Angry Michael watches TV. The outcome of this
process was that suddenly all attacks at school stopped. Since this containing of the aggressive dissociative
state is only a short-term measure, the therapist continued to work with the attachments between Michael
ESTD Newsletter
and his parents and processed early trauma, including severe domestic violence, using EMDR. After many
months of processing his painful early experiences and his own anxiety and fear, Michael was finally able
to integrate Angry Michael.
This presentation in children is often referred to as lying or pathological lying but in reality the child is
using derealisation to ensure that at least the ANP will remain blameless and can continue with the normal
process of attending school and learning. Many hours of intervention were wasted trying to change the
lying behaviour, as well as two series of work completed with Michael for anger management, none of
which enabled him to connect to the presence of a dissociative state.
ESTD Newsletter
There is a real concern with regard to the level of some childrens disconnection from reality in favour of
fantasy games, activities, books, and electronic games. This has a major impact on their relationships and
specifically the attachments to their caregivers. Like many of these children, 12-year-old Jane brought her
book with her to the intensive therapy. Intensive therapy includes working with the child and family 5 hours
per day for 10 days (Potgieter-Marks in Wieland, 2011). Initially reading during the breaks appeared to be
a positive activity and parents felt it enhanced her reading skills, until the third day when Jane refused to
engage with any person as she was too embroiled in her book to even hear or respond to any of the adults
around her. After various strategies and 2 hours later, Jane was engaged again in therapy, for the therapist
to discover that the book that she was reading was confirming her already existing fantasy world as it
was about a fantasy flight to outer space. Jane was also able to explain how she was kind of able to hear
us talk to her, but it was like she was watching everything from far away and she was not able to comply
with any our requests.
There is a radical change in these children when their fantasy life (dissociation) is exchanged for the
real life. Reality becomes a space of human connection, human interaction and human communication
where responsibility for behaviour is a reality and adaptation and change is required by social rules
and expectations. This is a very painful change for the dissociative child from the dissociative world of
disconnection, distanced relationships and taking no responsibility for behaviour and actions. The reality
is that if the child is spending more time and emotional investment on a consistent basis in fantasy, be
it books, toys, or electronic activities, and resists connection to reality and to people around him/her,
this should be seen as an area that might need to be explored in terms of possible dissociative features.
Fantasy toys, books, and electronic devises have become a modern escape for children with a history of
complex trauma and disorganized attachments, as a means of acceptable dissociation. The presence of
derealisation and depersonalisation can be such that it poses a challenge to the therapist to uncover the
dissociative features in this process.
ESTD Newsletter
10
bilateral stimulation, Jane linked Black to her past experiences while living with her extremely neglectful
birth mother. Jane was able to talk to Black and let it know that she has moved in the meantime to a safe
home and a safe family and safe parents and the bad things will not happen any more. Jane closed her
eyes and conveyed the message to Black. Jane finally started to see some light in Black and it changed to
Colour. Jane felt relieved.
The next session was very much a repetition of all the others. There was still no memory of information.
(Parents reported no significant problems at school and Jane was doing well on an academic level). Once
again the therapist explored the reason for the amnesia. This time, the therapist asked Jane whether she
would be able to look inside her head to see whether she could find anything that could help her understand
why she struggles to remember. Jane lowered her head, closed her eyes and after a long silence, Jane looked
up, she smiled and said she had found Gappy who was eating all my memories. With further internal
communication with Gappy, Jane shared that he eats my memories so that I dont need to remember the
bad stuff that happened to me.
This was the start of a process where Gappy was finally integrated and Jane started to remember
increasingly more information and finding more significant dissociative states. One year later Jane was able
for the first time in her life to remember Christmassomething that she had never been able to do before.
Finally Jane was on her way to start to live life in reality. The enuresis and encopresis persisted. Silberg
(2013) refers to Nijenhuis (2004) and states: Dissociative children may experience a wide rage of somatic
symptoms with no apparent physical cause that appear to be related to past traumas. Later during
therapy, a dissociative state that was much younger appeared and she believed that she was still living with
the birth mother and was unaware that she was living in the body of 10-year old Jane. Waters in Wieland
(2011) refers to Nijenhuis (2009) and explains that somatoform dissociative symptoms are nonorganic
(no medical cause) and occur when there is trauma that causes a severe threat to the body. It is an animal
defensive response in which the body holds the unprocessed memories somatically, causing a loss of
sensation of unexplained pain that is experienced by one dissociative part but not by another dissociative
part. The symptoms can come and go depending on whether the part with a particular symptom is present.
Many children with amnesia forget significant information for example that they had their birthday party
two days ago or that they had a major conflict the previous day with their best friend at school. Some
children might also alert the therapist to the fact that they cannot recall seeing the toy that they often play
with in the therapy room or might be shocked by seeing a drawing that they have previously made or poem
that they have written during a previous session, and deny vehemently that they have ever seen it before.
ESTD Newsletter
11
In cases of children who were neglected and abused early in life and are now living with foster carers or
adoptive parents, there is often a misconception that nurturing the child with the appearance of regressed
behaviour will enable the child to move forward developmentally in order to acquire more age-appropriate
behaviour. Although this is partly true, in many cases such as Sam, there is a very young dissociative
state that is not able to ever display developmentally appropriate behaviour unless it is addressed as a
dissociative state, and this requires a different approach. Shirar (1996) refers to regressive behaviour in
children, where the child repeats similar infantile behaviours that took place at the time of the trauma that
caused helplessness and anxiety. She also states Regressive behavior (Regressive states in my opinion)
can be more difficult to detect in children than in adults, especially when the child is very young to begin
with. Reverting to behavior of a lower developmental level is often perceived by parents as just being
childish, mood changes, whining or having a bad day.
Wieland (2011) refers to this as behavioural changes where the child will suddenly act much younger or
much older than the childs chronological age or to suddenly become aggressive when normally passive
and accommodating.
The presentation of the regressed behaviour in this instance would never successfully be addressed by
nurturing this infantile dissociative state. It was functional as it enabled Sam to be protected against the
adults demands and the responsibility of reality. On other occasions, Sam would be excessively controlling
and demanding, especially in terms of types of food, times when he needed food, and who was preparing
the food. In therapy, Sam disclosed that Bossy was like a mum and was just making sure that Little Baby
Sam was looked after. This information reflected Sams early experiences as a baby and toddler when he
had experienced profound neglect and had to fend for himself to survive.
ESTD Newsletter
12
introjects are much more forceful than other dissociative states, they can be more difficult to work with as
they often resist integration (Potgieter Marks in Vogt, 2012). Perpetrator introjects often cause increased
damage to the childs self as professionals and parents alike are increasingly placing pressure on the child
to change the behaviour, pressurize the child to choose good behaviour and even threaten the child with
police and jail. It is evident that perpetrator introjects have the capacity to force the childs caregivers into
desperate measures and, left untreated, have the capacity to ruin a childs life.
Summary
In all of these cases, only one or a couple of classic signs of dissociation were present, and not always
consistently in the same area of the childs life. The common denominator was that these children all
experienced early complex trauma and were clearly living with trauma that had never been processed. At
the time of the trauma, they did not always have the presence of their attachment figure, but had to survive
the trauma and continue with life.
In their lives, all of these children were in some way disconnected from the reality of their lives and their
unacceptable behaviour, and were unable to cope with reality in the way that we would expect from a
child in an age-appropriate way. They all struggled in their attachments and social relationships and were
unable to take responsibility for their actions consistently. Most of the children were unable to attain their
academic potential.
The challenge for the therapist working with children and adolescents is that they are unable to explain
their problems or their internal world verbally. Rather, they explain it to us through their behaviour and
actions, and we as adults, and even as therapists, may fall into the trap of trying to change them. Evidence
for this can be found in the short-term structured programs or processes offered and aimed at creating
the ability to conform to societal norms and expectations, which invariably fail with the dissociative child.
The reality is that dissociation can appear in various disguises and without effective training, regular
clinical supervision or consultation, we as therapists might merely be well-meaning. By looking in the
wrong direction, we are less effective in helping the children and adolescents to heal. If we dare not ask
ourselves the question could this be dissociation?, we will miss the often subtle and varied symptoms of
dissociation. Therapists may be in danger of dissociating from the dissociation unless they move outside
of their own comfortable working models, look in the direction of the dissociation and continue on the
never-ending journey of acquiring and integrating new knowledge and understanding of the traumatized
childs and adolescents complicated world. Only if we, as therapists, are brave enough to see, be curious
about, and explore their dissociative world with them, can we become part of the solution.
REFERENCES
Putnam, FW. (1998). Dissociation in Children and Adolescents. New York/London: The Guildford Press.
Shirar, L. 1996. Dissociative Children. Bridging the Inner & Outer Worlds. `London/New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Silberg, JL. (1986). The Dissociative Child. Diagnosis, Treatment and Management. Lutherville, The Sidran Press.
Silberg, JL. (2013). The Child Survivor. Healing Developmental Trauma and Dissociation. New York/London: Routledge
Van der Hart, O., Nijenhuis, R.S. & Steele, K. (2006). The Haunted Self. Structural Dissociation and the Treatment of Chronic
Traumatization. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Vogt, R. (2012). Perpetrator Introjects. Psychotherapeutic Diagnostics and Treatment Models. Kroning: Asanger Verlag
Wieland, S. (2011). Dissociation in Traumatised Children and Adolescents. New York/London:Routledge
ESTD Newsletter
13
ESTD Newsletter
14
ESTD Newsletter
15
ESTD Newsletter
17
Suzette Boon, Ph.D. Eli Somer, Ph.D. and Liora Somer, Art Therapist and Psychotherapist.
ESTD Newsletter
18
ESTD Newsletter
19
BOOK REVIEWS
By Henry Strick van Linschoten,
London 2015.
Psychotherapist in private practice.
THE BODY
KEEPS THE
SCORE
Author:
Bessel Van Der Kolk, MD
ESTD Newsletter
What is more exceptional is the range of nontraditional approaches he has tried out at the
Trauma Center he founded. Main methods that he
strongly recommends for their effectiveness are
EMDR; yoga; Richard Schwartzs Internal Family
Systems therapy (IFS); the body psychotherapy
approaches of Pesso, Ogden (sensorimotor
psychotherapy) and Levine; neurofeedback; and
theatre including improvisation. In between these
major recommendations he also shows partiality
towards EFT (or other tapping systems),
acupuncture, and mindfulness methods. While he
explains and quotes how many research studies
he has initiated, and points out how important
research evidence is for him, he freely admits that
many of his ideas have neither extensive nor even
sometimes partial formal research evidence for
their effectiveness.
In his understanding of the sequelae of trauma
Van der Kolk is of course enormously experienced.
In addition he is familiar with all the literature and
perspectives. In particular he describes dissociation
well and from different angles; in the chapter on
Internal Family Systems therapy, he describes how
IFS is designed to address Dissociative Identity
Disorder.
Van der Kolk is a practitioner, and writes for
practitioners. For him the careful practical evidence
(practice-based evidence perhaps, though he
doesnt use the expression) of having seen a number
of clients who did not improve with other methods
get better from using some unusual or even esoteric
practices is enough to put such a practice on his
list of things to try. Van der Kolk, and clearly the
Trauma Center, surely are rigorous in documenting
and reviewing what they do for each individual
client, and why they do it. But the variation seems
endless compared with most other places.
Van der Kolk is well aware that no practitioner is
going to be sufficiently trained in all of his favoured
approaches to be able to use them themselves,
apart from the question of whether this would
always work. But he assumes that it is always
possible to maintain contact after referring
someone to go and try something else that he
20
ESTD Newsletter
21
ESTD Newsletter
22
BOOK REVIEWS
By Julia Bueno
UKCP registered Integrative Psychotherapist.
Not My Secret To
Keep: A Memoir
of Healing From
Childhood Sexual
Abuse
Authors:
Digene Farrar with Cynthia Hurn
Portage Bay Press
ESTD Newsletter
23
ESTD Newsletter
24
ESTD Newsletter
25
Dear Readers, again, here comes the latest research on trauma and dissociation and related fields for your science-hungry brains
and hearts... As is true for all research: regard these studies with great care and a critical mind they deserve it!
ESTD Newsletter
26
ESTD Newsletter
27
Alterations of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Telomere Length with Early
Adversity and Psychopathology
Tyrka, A.R., Parade, S.H., Price, L.H., Kao, H.-T., Porton, B., Philip, N.S., Welch, E.S. & Carpenter, L.L.
(2015). Alterations of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Telomere Length with Early Adversity and
Psychopathology. Biological Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print]. Online [retrieved May.3.2015]: http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749099
Abstract
Background
Telomere shortening and alterations of mitochondrial biogenesis are involved in cellular aging. Childhood
adversity is associated with telomere shortening, and several investigations have shown short telomeres
in psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have examined whether mitochondria might be involved in
neuropsychiatric conditions; findings are limited and no prior work has examined this in relation to stress
exposure.
Methods
Two-hundred ninety healthy adults provided information on childhood parental loss and maltreatment and
completed diagnostic interviews. Participants were categorized into four groups based upon the presence
or absence of childhood adversity and the presence or absence of lifetime psychopathology (depressive,
anxiety, and substance use disorders). Telomere length and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number were
measured from leukocyte DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Childhood adversity and lifetime psychopathology were each associated with shorter telomeres (p <
.01) and higher mtDNA copy numbers (p < .001). Significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers and shorter
telomeres were seen in individuals with major depression, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders, as
well as those with parental loss and childhood maltreatment. A history of substance disorders was also
associated with significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers.
Conclusions
This study provides the first evidence of an alteration of mitochondrial biogenesis with early life stress and
with anxiety and substance use disorders. We replicate prior work on telomere length and psychopathology
and show that this effect is not secondary to medication use or comorbid medical illness. Finally, we show
that early life stress and psychopathology are each associated with these markers of cellular aging.
ESTD Newsletter
28
The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) Scale for the
Retrospective Assessment of Abuse and Neglect During Development
Teicher M.H. & Parigger A. (2015). The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) Scale
for the Retrospective Assessment of Abuse and Neglect During Development. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117423.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117423. Online [retrieved May.3.2015]: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/
article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117423
Abstract
There is increasing interest in childhood maltreatment as a potent stimulus that may alter trajectories of
brain development, induce epigenetic modifications and enhance risk for medical and psychiatric disorders.
Although a number of useful scales exist for retrospective assessment of abuse and neglect they have
significant limitations. Moreover, they fail to provide detailed information on timing of exposure, which is
critical for delineation of sensitive periods. The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE)
scale was developed in a sample of 1051 participants using item response theory to gauge severity of
exposure to ten types of maltreatment (emotional neglect, non-verbal emotional abuse, parental physical
maltreatment, parental verbal abuse, peer emotional abuse, peer physical bullying, physical neglect, sexual
abuse, witnessing interparental violence and witnessing violence to siblings) during each year of childhood.
Items included in the subscales had acceptable psychometric properties based on infit and outfit mean
square statistics, and each subscale passed Andersens Likelihood ratio test. The MACE provides an overall
severity score and multiplicity score (number of types of maltreatment experienced) with excellent testretest reliability. Each type of maltreatment showed good reliability as did severity of exposure across
each year of childhood. MACE Severity correlated 0.738 with Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) score
and MACE Multiplicity correlated 0.698 with the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale (ACE). However,
MACE accounted for 2.00- and 2.07-fold more of the variance, on average, in psychiatric symptom ratings
than CTQ or ACE, respectively, based on variance decomposition. Different types of maltreatment had
distinct and often unique developmental patterns. The 52-item MACE, a simpler Maltreatment Abuse and
Exposure Scale (MAES) that only assesses overall exposure and the original test instrument (MACE-X)
with several additional items plus spreadsheets and R code for scoring are provided to facilitate use and
to spur further development.
ESTD Newsletter
29
intervention?
Methods
A mixed-methods design incorporated quantitative and qualitative data from a questionnaire with
qualitative data from two focus groups. Sixteen (of 20) case managers from an early psychosis intervention
centre participated in the study (16 completed a questionnaire, eight participated in focus groups).
Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative data and qualitative material was examined using
a grounded theory approach.
Results
The results showed that perceived barriers to delivering trauma-focused intervention were increased
mental health risks for clients with psychosis, workload pressures and poor client engagement.
Targeted training and formal professional guidance were thought to best scaffold an intervention.
Conclusions
Post-traumatic stress disorder intervention for first-episode psychosis clients should address engagement,
make safeguarded provisions for family involvement and be sufficiently paced and flexible. Traumafocused intervention is perceived with a degree of caution, is often not prioritized, lacks institutional
support and requires more targeted training. It is important to conduct further research regarding the
safety of trauma interventions alongside psychosis in order to address widespread concerns.
ESTD Newsletter
30
ESTD Newsletter
31
ESTD Newsletter
32
Couple Therapy with Adult Survivors of Child Abuse: Gender, Power, and Trust
Wells, M.A. & Kuhn, V.P. (2015). Couple Therapy with Adult Survivors of Child Abuse: Gender, Power, and
Trust. Socio-Emotional Relationship Therapy AFTA SpringerBriefs in Family Therapy pp 107-119. Online
[retrieved May.3.2015]: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-13398-0_9
Abstract
Many couples in therapy have a history of childhood abuse. Sensitivity to power and difficulty with trusting
ones intimate partner are key concerns for these couples. This chapter presents the relational trust
theory, which describes how gendered power imbalances in couple interactions can trigger distrustful
emotional power responses from the adult-survivor partner(s). Drawing upon Socio-Emotional Relationship
Therapy (SERT) approaches, the clinical processes described attend to gender, power, and emotions in
couple interactions in order to help partners disentangle these dual influences of power and move from
defensiveness with each other toward a more trusting position. Case examples show the problems
generated by the intermingling of gendered power dynamics and adult-survivor partner. As partners
become better able to engage in processes of mutuality, distrustful adult-survivor power responses
typically recede as a result of the adult survivors perception of the partner as trustworthy, thereby
enhancing relational trust and couple intimacy.
ESTD Newsletter
33
Secure-Base Caregiving and Adult Attachment: Development Within the ClientPsychotherapist Relationship
Weeks, D.A. (2015). Secure-Base Caregiving and Adult Attachment: Development Within the ClientPsychotherapist Relationship. Dissertation, Walden University. Online [retrieved May.3.2015]: http://
scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1334&context=dissertations
Abstract
Recent studies have shown significant improvements in the attachment security of adult therapy clients
during therapy, supporting Bowlbys theory that such improvement can be influenced by secure-base
caregiving provided by mentors such as therapists. However, because these studies did not measure the
secure-base variable, its relationship to client attachment development remains unknown. The present
study is the first to evaluate that relationship by measuring clients pre and posttherapy attachment
security using the Relationship Scales Questionnaire and therapists secure-base caregiving using the
Client Attachment to Therapist and Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form. Of 21 initially insecure client
participants, 17 experienced high levels of secure-base caregiving from their therapists (the SBC-High
group) while 4 experienced low levels (the SBC-Low group). Comparison of pre and posttherapy group mean
attachment scores, using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, found a statistically significant improvement
(a = .01) in attachment security for the SBC-High group with no statistical change in attachment security
for the SBC-Low group. These findings suggest that therapists and other mentors can positively influence
the attachment development of their insecure mentees. Purposeful incorporation of this knowledge into
the design and goals of existing graduate and professional mentoring programs can positively influence
regenerative social change by promoting the attachment security of approximately one third of mentees
expected to be insecurely attached, based on demographic studies. Improving their attachments can equip
them to positively influence the attachments of all their future insecure clients who, like them, might then
realize the multiple benefits associated with attachment security.
ESTD Newsletter
34
June 3-5, 2015: "Trauma, Dissociation and Psychosis", an international conference that will take place in Kristiansand,
Norway.
Keynote speakers: Andrew Moskowitz, Colin Ross, Anthony Morrison, Ellert Nijenhuis, Inez Myin-Germeys, and Eleanor Longden.
Pre-conference workshop: Dolores Mosquera
Website: traumaconference.no
June 10-13, 2015: Vilnius, Lithuania XIV Conference of European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Trauma in
changing societies: social context and clinical practice.
http://estss2015.eu/
June 11-13, 2015: Group Therapy, Perpetrator Attachment & Social Neurobiology, Leipzig, Germany
Confirmed speakers are: Dr. Stephen W. Porges, Dr. Sue Carter, Dr. Andrew Moskowitz,
Dr. Luise Reddemann, Dr. Bernhard Strau, Dr. Adah Sachs, Dr. Michael Hayne, Dr. Ruth Blizard and many more. German-English
interpretations for all presentations!
http://www.traumapotenziale.de/veranstaltungen15_en.html
October 17-18, 2015: Utilisation of EMDR in the Treatment of Complex Trauma and Dissociation one-day workshop
with Roger Solomon. In English with French translation.
Website : www.ietsp.fr
November 27th-29th, 2015, International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation's Australia & New Zealand
regional conference, Sydney. Featuring Richard Kluft, MD, Bethany Brand, PhD, Joyanna Silberg, PhD, Warwick Middleton,
MD, Russell Meares, MD, Lynette Danylchuk, PhD, Phil Kinsler, PhD, and the Chief Royal Commissioner of the Australian Royal
Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Justice Peter McClellan.
ESTD Newsletter
Estonia
35
ESTD Newsletter
Jonas Mikaliunas
jonas.mikaliunas@gmail.com
Poland
Agnieszka Widera-Wysoczanska
instytut@psychoterapia.wroclaw.pl
Igor Pietkewicz ipietkowicz@swps.edu.pl
Radoslaw Tomalski radektomalski@poczta.onet.pl
36
ESTD Newsletter
37