Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bil
Topic
Objective
Theory
Equipment
Procedure
Sample Of Calculation
Conclusion
10
References
Page No
Objective
The objective of this experiment is to demonstrate the effect of the flow rate
variation on the performance characteristics of a counter-flow and parallel flow
concentric tube heat exchanger. Other objectives for this experiment also include:
i.
ii.
iii.
Introduction
Recuperator
Fluids exchanging heat are on either side of a dividing wall
Regenerator
Hot and cold fluids pass alternatively a sink and a source for heat flow
iii.
Evaporative Type
A liquid is cooled evaporatively and continuously in the same space as
the coolant.
Theoretical Background
Concentric tube heat exchanger is one of the most common conductiveconvective types of heat exchanger. Parallel flow is defined as when both
fluids enter the concentric tube heat exchanger from the same sides and flow
through the same directions whereas the counter flow is defined as when both
fluids enter from the opposite sides and flow through the opposite directions.
It is commonly claimed that the counter flow is more efficient than the
parallel flow.
TH
TC
As a matter of fact, the temperature of the hot and cold fluids changes
along the tube. Therefore, in order to calculate the heat transfer between the
two fluids, equation (1) should be integrated between the inlet and outlet
conditions, giving that
q = UAT l m .........................(2)
where T l m is the mean temperature difference across the heat exchanger and
it can be given as
T l m = T i n - T o u t / ln (T i n / T o u t ) ............................(3)
Cp H
THin
Cp C
TCin
........................(7)
The value of the actual heat transfer may be obtained from calculating
the energy lost by the hot fluid from equation (4) or the energy gained by the
cold fluid from equation (5). Since the energy gained by the cold fluid is lost
through the insulating material to the surrounding air, it is preferable to
substitute the value of energy lost by the hot fluid as the actual heat transfer
in equation (7).
In order to determine the maximum possible heat transfer for the heat
exchanger, one of the fluids is logically required to undergo a temperature
change which represents the maximum temperature difference present in the
heat exchanger, which is the difference in the temperatures for the hot and
cold fluids entering the heat exchanger. Likewise, the fluid is the one having
the minimum value of Cp. Thus, the maximum possible heat transfer then
can be expressed as
q m a x = ( Cp) m i n (T H i n T C i n ) .......................(8)
The minimum fluid may be either the hot or cold fluid, depending on the mass
flow rates and specific heats, and so the efficiency , is
=
qmax
qH
x 100% ......................(9)
Temperature Readings
Experimental Procedure
1. Set the following initial conditions: Controlled hot water temperature = 60 oC; Cold
water volumetric flow rate Vc = 2000 cm3/min.
2. Set the apparatus for counter flow (as seen on the apparatus panel). After conditions
have stabilized and while maintaining a constant cold water flow rate, record all water
temperature readings - i.e., hot and cold temperatures at inlet, mid-point and outlet for at least the following hot water flow rates: 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 cm3/min.
3. For each hot water flow rate, calculate the power emitted, power absorbed, power
lost, efficiency, log mean temperature difference and overall heat transfer coefficient.
For heat exchanger specifications see the panel located on the apparatus.
4. Then, the experiment continued with parallel flow concentric tube heat exchanger.
5.
Discuss the effect of flow rate on the calculated data above. Discuss any error from
this experiment that may skew your results
As
2
= 0.0641 m
h ,
T
57.3
57.3
57.5
57.6
57.6
57.4
57.5
Cold water
T h, mid
27.8
27.8
27.8
27.9
27.9
28.0
28.1
T h, out
42.8
45.3
47.5
49.1
50.0
50.5
51.4
Volumetri
c Flow
Rate,
Vc
l/min
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
c ,
T
T c, mid
T c, out
24.0
24.1
24.2
24.3
24.4
24.5
24.6
15.1
16.2
17.0
16.5
17.0
17.6
16.5
30.3
32.1
34.1
35.5
36.3
37.1
37.3
h ,
T
57.7
57.4
57.4
57.6
57.8
57.6
57.8
T h, mid
28.2
28.3
28.3
28.4
28.5
28.6
28.6
Cold water
T h, out
42.2
46.9
48.7
49.8
51.0
51.5
52.2
Volumetri
c Flow
Rate,
Vc
l/min
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
c ,
T
T c, mid
T c, out
24.3
24.4
24.5
24.6
24.8
24.8
24.9
13.8
14.9
16.3
16.5
-11.1
-9.4
-11.4
30.9
33.2
36.1
36.3
37.1
37.5
38.3
Counter Flow
Vh
Power
Emitte
d
(W)
(
3
m /s x 10
Power
Absorbe
d
(W)
Power
Lost
Efficienc
y ()
T1
T2
Tm
(W)
(%)
2.5
3.33
4.17
5.0
5.83
6.67
W/(
2
1.67
m .C
0.996
0.863
0.133
86.6
14.5
6.3
9.84
1.37
0.825
1.096
0.272
132.9
12
9.87
1.73
0.687
1.356
0.669
197.4
10
9.9
9.95
2.13
0.584
1.535
0.951
262.7
8.5
11.2
9.79
2.45
0.522
1.631
1.108
312.2
7.6
11.9
9.59
2.65
0.474
1.726
1.252
364.1
6.9
12.6
9.47
2.85
0.419
1.740
1.321
415.1
6.1
12.7
9.00
3.02
Parallel Flow
Vh
Power
Emitted
(W)
Power
Absorbe
d
(W)
Power
Lost
Efficienc
y ()
T1
T2
Tm
(W)
(%)
W/(
m3 /s x 105
1.67
2.5
m2 . C
0.969
0.891
0.078
91.92
14.1
6.5
9.81
1.416
0.722
1.206
0.484
167.12
10.5
8.8
9.62
1.954
3.33
4.17
5.0
5.83
6.67
0.639
1.343
0.704
210.12
9.3
9.8
9.55
2.194
0.536
1.576
1.040
293.99
7.8
11.5
9.53
2.579
0.481
1.672
1.191
347.53
12.2
9.36
2.786
0.433
1.768
1.335
408.30
6.3
12.9
9.21
2.994
0.392
1.836
1.444
468.77
5.7
13.4
9.01
3.180
Sample of Calculation
C ph=4.185 kJ /(kg K )
C pc =4.187 kJ /(kg K )
h=983.2kg /m3
c =998.2 kg /m3
V h=1 l/min
5
= 1.67 x 10
Power Emitted =
= 3.33 x 10
m3 /s
V h h C ph
h ,T h , out
(
T
5
=(1.67 x 10 )(983.2)(4.185)(57.3-42.8)
= 0.99 W
Power Absorbed =
V c c C pc
l/min
c ,
( T c, out T
m /s
=(3.33 x 10
)(983.2)(4.187)(30.3-24.0)
= 0.863 W
Power Absorbed
x 100
POwer Emitted
0.863
x 100
= 0.99
= 86.6 %
c ,
T 2=T h ,out T
h ,T c ,out
T 1=T
=57.3 42.8
= 24.0 C
T m=
T 1 T 2
T 1
ln (
)
T 2
14.56.3
14.5
ln
6.3
= 9.84 C
=35.8
23.7
Power Absorbed
As x T m
0.863
= 0.0641 x 9.84
2
= 1.37 W/( m . C
=253.03%
Average
T m=
=9.642 C
Average U = (1.37 + 1.73 +2.13 + 2.45 + 2.65 +2.85 + 3.02) / 7
2
= 2.31 W/( m . C
)/7
T m=
=8.155 C
Average U = (1.416 + 1.954 + 2.194 + 2.579 + 2.786 + 2.994 + 3.18) / 7
2
=2.433 W/( m . C
Graph
Counter Flow
GRAPH OF TEMPERATURE
140
120
100
80
Temperature
60
40
20
0
1
Parallel
GRAPH OF TEMPERATURE
140
120
100
80
Temperature
60
40
20
0
1
Discussion
Muhammad Syafieq Bin Sipon
2014284374
There are a few objectives which are to be achieved in this experiment such as to
demonstrate the working principles of concentric flow heat exchanger under parallel as well
as counter flow condition and other objectives else but the most important part of the
objectives is to determine the most efficient flow of concentric tube heat exchanger whether it
is the parallel flow or counter-current flow.
A concentric tube heat exchanger is used to achieve these objectives. The heat
exchanger itself is combined with thermometers and flow rate m meters. Thus, the control of
the hot fluids temperatures and both hot and cold fluids flow rates are made easier. We can
observe the values of THin, THout, THmid, TCmid, TCin, and TCout. This experiment is conducted with
two parts of separated conditions, which are by varying the flow rates at constant temperature
and by varying the temperatures at constant flow rate.
From the experiment value, know that the effect of changing the volumetric flow rate
of the hot fluid. For counter flow, can seeing the value of power emitted and absorbed
increase when the volumetric flow rate of hot fluid increases. Besides that, knows the value
of power lost. The value of efficiency are recorded is constantly. It is because affected by
human error while taking the reading. So, some value in the table is not precisely. The overall
heat transfer increase because of changing volumetric flow rate.
For parallel flow, the value are recorded is not same like counter flow. The value for
power emitted and absorbed is larger than counter flow opposites the theoretical where the
power emitted and absorbed can smaller than counter flow. The volumetric flow rate of hot
fluid increased, the power emitted and absorbed not consistent reading because we do error
during experiment for parallel. Can seeing the power lost in parallel flow is more than
counter flow
Conclusion
As the conclusion, we can say the changing volumetric flow rate of the hot fluid will
affect the heat exchanger factor. Base from experiment, can seeing the different flow in tube
exchanger can increase or decrease energy transfer in fluid. In theoretical, the parallel flow
should be more efficiency than counter flow but from the result that we obtain differ from the
theory.