Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preventive Medicine
4
5
6
a r t i c l e
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Keywords:
Public health
Work
Sedentary behavior
Occupational sitting
Change in occupational sitting time
Body mass index
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Objective. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between ve-year changes in occupational sitting and body mass index (BMI) in working adults.
Methods. We analyzed data from The Danish Work Environment Cohort Study (2005 and 2010, n = 3.482).
Data on occupational sitting, weight, height and several potential confounders were self-reported. The association between change in occupational sitting (hours) (categorized as large decrease b7.5, moderate decrease
7.5 to b 2.5, no change 2.5 to 2.5, moderate increase N2.5 to 7.5 and large increase N7.5) and change in
BMI was explored by multiple linear regression analyses.
Results. 43.0% men and 36.1% women had high occupational sitting time (25 h per week) at baseline. 31.8%
men and 27.2% women decreased while 30.0% men and 33.0% women increased occupational sitting. The proportion of obese (BMI 30) increased almost 3% for both genders. BMI changed 0.13 (CI: 0.06; 0.20, p = 0.0003), per
category of change in occupational sitting in women, but no association was found in men.
Conclusion. In women, there is a positive association between ve-year changes in occupational sitting and
BMI in this study.
2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
3Q2
R
O
1Q1
31
35
33
32
34
Introduction
37
38
The prevalence of overweight and obesity has been strongly increasing the last decades (Haslam and James, 2005; Kelly et al., 2008). Because overweight and obesity increase the risk for several diseases
such as diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease, it is considered to
be among the largest challenges for public health worldwide (Haslam
and James, 2005; Kelly et al., 2008). A contributing factor for the obesity
epidemic could be, that work has changed from mainly involving different forms of physical activity to becoming mainly sedentary for a high
proportion of the working population (Stamatakis et al., 2007; Juneau
and Potvin, 2010; Allman-Farinelli et al., 2010; Church et al., 2011). Because adults often spend more than half of their waking hours at work
(Tudor-Locke et al., 2011), and sedentary behavior is characterized by
a low energy expenditure, this change has potential effects on obesity
(Pate et al., 2008; Church et al., 2011), and, more documentation for
changes in body weight from changes in occupational sitting is needed
(Hamilton et al., 2007). One prospective study found a positive association between sedentary work and body mass index (BMI) (Hu et al.,
2003). However, other prospective studies found no associations
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Q3
N
C
O
43
44
41
42
36
39
40
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Corresponding author at: National Research Center for the Working Environment,
Lers Parkall 105, DK-2100 Copenhagen , Denmark.
E-mail address: dorte.eriksen@yahoo.com (D. Eriksen).
between sedentary work and BMI (van Uffelen et al., 2010). The strongest epidemiological evidence for the positive health effects of physical
activity is based on studies investigating associations between changes
in physical activity and risk for impaired health and diseases (Bravata
et al., 2007). However, no previous studies have to our knowledge investigated if changes in sedentary working time are associated with
changes in BMI. The main aim of this study was to investigate the association between changes in occupational sitting time and BMI in a representative sample of the working population in Denmark, testing the
a priori hypothesis of a positive association between these variables.
55
56
Methods
65
Participants/study population
66
This study used data from The Danish Work Environment Cohort Study
(DWECS), consisting of a representative sample of the Danish working population aged 1859 years at entry. In 2005 the survey used a combination of (postalor internet based) questionnaire (90%) and telephone interview (10%) among a
representative sample of 20,000 workers with a response rate of 63%. In 2010 the
survey was conducted using (postal- or internet based) questionnaire only, and
achieved a response rate of 53% of a representative sample of 30,000 workers.
This study includes data from the 4732 working respondents who participated
in both 2005 and 2010.
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
0091-7435/ 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: Eriksen, D., et al., Sedentary workAssociations between ve-year changes in occupational sitting time and body mass
index, Prev. Med. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
Statistical analysis
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
98
R
O
Participants reported their amount of occupational sitting time by answering the question Does your work imply sitting? with six response categories
(Almost all the time, approximately of the time, approximately of the
time, approximately of the time, rarely/very little or never). Similar categorical measures of occupational sitting have been used previously (Choi et al.,
2010; Stock et al., 2005). Accounting for participants having varying number
of working hours, the categories of sitting time were calculated into sitting
hours, based on self-reported weekly working hours achieved by response to
the questions How many hours a week do you work in your main job, including
possible extra hours? and How many hours a week do you normally work in
your secondary job? The total amount of working hours per week was then
multiplied by the constant for occupational sitting, corresponding to the previously mentioned categorical occupational sitting time (0.875, 0.750, 0.500,
0.250, 0.125 and 0.000). The change in occupational sitting time from 2005 to
2010 was calculated by subtracting occupational sitting in 2005 from occupational sitting in 2010, and dened on an ordinal scale with ve categories of
weekly change (hours) (large decrease b7.5, moderate decrease = 7.5 to
b 2.5, no change = 2.5 to 2.5, moderate increase N 2.5 to 7.5 and large increase N7.5). Moreover, the baseline weekly occupational sitting hours was dened on an ordinal scale with three categories (low: 10, moderate: N 10 to b 25
and high: 25).
C
E
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Table 1
t1:1
Characteristics of the study population for each sex separately, numbers (n), percent (%). t1:2
N = 3482. The Danish Work Environment Cohort (NAK), 2005.
t1:3
Occupational sitting
76
Males
Females
t1:4
(n = 1679,
48.2%)
(n = 1803,
51.8%)
t1:5
t1:6
Confounders
Age (years)
1829
3039
4049
5059
60
164
429
587
470
29
9.8
25.6
35.0
28.0
1.7
143
497
693
459
11
7.9
27.6
38.4
25.5
0.6
Baseline BMI
Underweight (b18.5)
Normal weight (18.5b25)
Overweight (25b30)
Obesity (30)
5
781
715
178
0.3
46.5
42.6
10.6
51
1198
416
138
2.8
66.4
23.1
7.7
61
437
928
253
3.6
26.0
55.3
15.1
27
360
1182
234
1.5
20.0
65.6
13.0
Smoking status
Smoker
Ex-smoker
Never
430
464
785
25.6
27.6
46.8
457
514
832
25.4
28.5
46.2
455
391
441
392
27.1
23.3
26.3
23.4
452
416
514
421
25.1
23.1
28.7
23.4
Questionnaire method
Postal or internet based questionnaire
Telephone interview
1347
332
80.2
19.8
1493
310
82.8
17.2
184
796
354
345
11.0
47.4
21.1
20.6
149
789
659
206
8.3
43.8
36.6
11.4
607
350
722
36.2
20.9
43.0
683
469
651
37.9
26.0
36.1
Please cite this article as: Eriksen, D., et al., Sedentary workAssociations between ve-year changes in occupational sitting time and body mass
index, Prev. Med. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
t1:7
t1:8
t1:9
t1:10
t1:11
t1:12
t1:13
t1:14
t1:15
t1:16
t1:17
t1:18
t1:19
t1:20
t1:21
t1:22
t1:23
t1:24
t1:25
t1:26
t1:27
t1:28
t1:29
t1:30
t1:31
t1:32
t1:33
t1:34
t1:35
t1:36
t1:37
t1:38
t1:39
t1:40
t1:41
t1:42
t1:43
t1:44
t1:45
t1:46
t1:47
t1:48
t1:49
t1:50
t1:51
sitting in 2005 and BMI for both genders as in the primary analyses (re- 196
sults not shown).
197
Table 2
Characteristics of the study population stratied by BMI and sex, number (n) and percent (%).
N = 3482. The Danish Work Environment Cohort (NAK), 2005 to 2010.
t2:4
Males (n = 1679;
48.2%)
Females (n = 1803;
51.8%)
Discussion
198
t2:5
2005
2005
199
2010
2010
t2:6
BMI
t2:7
t2:8
t2:9
t2:10
Underweight (b18.5)
Normal weight (18.5b25)
Overweight (25b30)
Obesity (30)
5
781
715
178
0.3
46.5
42.6
10.6
4
683
772
220
0.2
40.7
46.0
13.1
51
1198
416
138
2.8
66.4
23.1
7.7
41
1079
493
190
2.3
60.0
27.3
10.5
Results
166
167
195
t3:1
t3:2
Table 3
Association between change in occupational sitting time and change in BMI (BMI). N = 3482. The Danish Work Environment Cohort (NAK), 2005 to 2010.
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
t3:3
BMI
t3:17
t3:18
t3:19
t3:20
t3:21
t3:4
t3:5
t3:6
t3:7
t3:8
t3:9
t3:10
t3:11
t3:12
t3:13
t3:14
t3:15
t3:16
R
O
180
181
178
179
176
177
174
175
172
173
170
171
N
C
O
168
169
165
Males
Large decrease
Moderate decrease
No change
Moderate increase
Large increase
Females
Large decrease
Moderate decrease
No change
Moderate increase
Large increase
CI
BMI
CI
0.9342
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.06
0
0.27
0.31
0.22
0.27
0.27
0.19
0.27
0.21
Reference
0.7563
0.9750
0.7177
0.6685
0.46
0.50
0.24
0.06
0
0.80
0.12
0.80
0.19
0.50
0.01
0.36
0.25
Reference
0.0077
0.0016
0.0629
0.7092
BMI
CI
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.07
0
0.22
0.31
0.25
0.28
0.27
0.18
0.34
0.20
Reference
0.7446
0.9088
0.6724
0.6013
0.43
0.50
0.25
0.10
0
0.77
0.10
0.81
0.20
0.51
0.00
0.40
0.20
Reference
0.0108
0.0010
0.0502
0.4961
0.9169
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.07
0
0.22
0.31
0.25
0.28
0.26
0.19
0.34
0.20
Reference
0.7415
0.9137
0.7574
0.6166
0.46
0.48
0.23
0.08
0
0.79
0.12
0.79
0.18
0.48
0.03
0.38
0.22
Reference
0.0073
0.0018
0.0811
0.0671
0.0038
*
0.8839
0.0054
0.0058
BMI: Change in BMI from 2005 to 2010. CI: 95% condence interval. P: Signicance level. Bold writing: P b 0.05. *Overall signicance level. Large decrease: b7.5 h. Moderate decrease:
7.5 h to b2.5 h. No change: 2.5 h to 2.5 h. Moderate increase: N2.5 h to 7.5 h. Large increase: N7.5 h.
a
Crude analysis: Adjusted for age.
b
Adjusted for age + baseline BMI, smoking, leisure time physical activity, questionnaire method, and job seniority.
c
Adjusted as in model 2 + SES.
Please cite this article as: Eriksen, D., et al., Sedentary workAssociations between ve-year changes in occupational sitting time and body mass
index, Prev. Med. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
4
t4:1
t4:2
Table 4
Association between level of baseline occupational sitting time and change in BMI (BMI), N = 3544. The Danish Work Environment Cohort (NAK), 2005 to 2010.
Crude (Model 1)a
t4:3
BMI
t4:4
t4:5
t4:6
t4:7
t4:8
t4:9
t4:10
t4:11
t4:12
Males
Low
Moderate
High
Females
Low
Moderate
High
CI
BMI
CI
0.4085
0.11
0.06
0.00
0.05
0.28
0.13
0.27
Reference
0.1843
0.4977
0.20
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.13
0.31
Reference
0.0496
0.4317
BMI
CI
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.16
0.20
0.17
0.23
Reference
0.8383
0.7742
0.18
0.07
0.00
0.02
0.39
0.15
0.29
Reference
0.0823
0.5436
0.5268
0.09
0.06
0.00
0.07
0.26
0.13
0.26
Reference
0.2663
0.5237
0.22
0.08
0.00
0.02
0.42
0.14
0.30
Reference
0.0297
0.4711
0.1442
0.9554
0.0893
0.2133
BMI: Change in BMI from 2005 to 2010. CI: 95% condence interval. P: Signicance level. *Overall signicance level. Low: 10 h. Moderate: N10 h to b25 h. High: 25 h.
a
Crude analysis: Adjusted for age.
b
Adjusted for age + baseline BMI, smoking, leisure time physical activity, questionnaire method, and job seniority.
c
Adjusted as in model 2 + SES.
239
240
241
the waking hours for working adults (Tudor-Locke et al., 2011). Therefore, the occupational domain is a relevant setting for intervening on extensive sitting (Chau et al., 2012; Owen et al., 2011).
242
243
279
280
The main strength of this study is the prospective study design with
a large representative sample of Danish workers. The question on occupational sitting time has been used in earlier studies and have shown acceptable validity and reliability (Stock et al., 2005; Andersen et al., 2000;
Holtermann et al., 2012; Choi et al., 2010), and the ability to estimate the
weekly number of hours sitting at work strengthens the study (van
Uffelen et al., 2010). Additional strength is the ability to investigate
the association between changes in occupational sitting time and BMI.
We adjusted for baseline BMI and other potential confounders. We did
not adjust for baseline sitting time. Given the chosen analytical approach in this study, including the treatment of ordinal variables as
quantitative, we consider that changes in sitting time are associated
with similar changes in BMI independent of baseline.
The main limitation is the use of self-reported measures of occupational sitting time and BMI, which may have been inuenced by selfreporting bias. Self-reported sitting time is often overestimated (Clark
et al., 2011; Juneau and Potvin, 2010), while self-reported BMI is often
underestimated (Nyholm et al., 2007). These issues might have led to
underestimation of the association between change in occupational sitting time and BMI. It would be a methodological strength for future cohort studies to collect objective data on these variables (LagerstedOlsen et al., 2013). The survey response rate was 63% in 2005 and 53%
in 2010. Additionally the study only included individuals, who
responded in both years. This might have led to selection biases, if participants were healthier than non-participants. Potentially this might
cause underestimation of the association between changes in occupational sitting time and BMI. Moreover some methodological weaknesses
are present, like not being able to estimate the energy expenditure, not
having a clear denition of smoking and not having information on
commuting physical activity, which may have a signicant inuence
on BMI, even independently of occupational and recreational physical
activity. We cannot exclude the risk of reversed causation, since the
changes in occupational sitting and associated changes in BMI are measured during the same time span. Future studies should focus on prospective designs using objective measures for occupational and leisure
time sitting, and might focus on the potential difference between men
and women concerning the association between occupational sitting
and overweight/obesity.
281
Conclusion
282
We found a positive association between change in occupational sitting time and BMI from 2005 to 2010 in women. More prospective
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
283
284
285
289
290
Acknowledgment
291
R
O
286
287
288
For help with managing the data in SAS: Data manager Ebbe 292
Villadsen, National Research Center for the Working Environment, 293
Copenhagen, Denmark
294
258
259
256
257
254
255
252
253
250
251
248
249
246
247
t4:13
t4:14
t4:15
t4:16
244
245
References
295
Allman-Farinelli, M.A., Chey, T., Merom, D., Bauman, A.E., 2010. Occupational risk of overweight and obesity: an analysis of the Australian Health Survey. J. Occup. Med.
Toxicol. 5, 14.
Andersen, L.B., Schnohr, P., Schroll, M., Hein, H.O., 2000. All-cause mortality associated
with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch. Intern. Med. 160, 16211628.
Bravata, D.M., Smith-Spangler, C., Sundaram, V., et al., 2007. Using pedometers to increase
physical activity and improve health. A systematic review. JAMA 298, 22962304.
Brnnum-Hansen, H., Andersen, O., Kjller, M., Rasmussen, N., 2004. Social gradient in life
expectancy and health expectancy in Denmark. Soz. Praventivmed. 49, 3641.
Brown, W.J., Miller, Y.D., Miller, R., 2003. Sitting time and work patterns as indicators of
overweight and obesity in Australian adults. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 27,
13401346.
Chau, J.Y., Van Der Ploeg, H.P., Merom, D., Chey, T., Bauman, A.E., 2012. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev. Med. 54, 195200.
Choi, B., Schnall, P.L., Yang, H., et al., 2010. Sedentary work, low physical job demand, and
obesity in US workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53, 10881101.
Church, T.S., Thomas, D.M., Tudor-Locke, C., et al., 2011. Trends over 5 decades in U.S.
occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One 6,
17.
Clark, B., Thorp, A., Winkler, E., et al., 2011. Validity of self-report measures of workplace
sitting time and breaks in sitting time. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
Ferrando, A.A., Stuart, C.A., Shefeld-Moore, M., Wolfe, R.R., 1999. Inactivity amplies the
catabolic response of skeletal muscle to cortisol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84,
35153521.
Hamilton, M.T., Hamilton, D.G., Zderic, T.W., 2007. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 56, 26552667.
Hannerz, H., Albertsen, K., Nielsen, M.L., Tuchsen, F., Burr, H., 2004. Occupational factors
and 5-year weight change among men in a Danish national cohort. Health Psychol.
23, 283288.
Haslam, D.W., James, W.P., 2005. Obesity. Lancet 366, 11971209.
Holtermann, A., Hansen, J.V., Burr, H., Sogaard, K., Sjogaard, G., 2012. The health paradox
of occupational and leisure-time physical activity. Br. J. Sports Med. 46, 291295.
Hu, F.B., Li, T.Y., Colditz, G.A., Willett, W.C., Manson, J.E., 2003. Television watching and
other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus
in women. JAMA 289, 17851791.
Jans, M.P., Proper, K.I., Hildebrandt, V.H., 2007. Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers: differences between occupations and business sectors. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33, 450454.
Juneau, C.E., Potvin, L., 2010. Trends in leisure-, transport-, and work-related physical activity in Canada 19942005. Prev. Med. 51, 384386.
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
Q4
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
Please cite this article as: Eriksen, D., et al., Sedentary workAssociations between ve-year changes in occupational sitting time and body mass
index, Prev. Med. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
Pace, N., Kodama, A.M., Price, D.C., Grunbaum, B.W., Rahlmann, D.F., Newsom, B.D., 1976.
Body composition changes in men and women after 23 weeks of bed rest. Life Sci.
Space Res. 269274.
Pate, R.R., O'Neill, J.R., Lobelo, F., 2008. The evolving denition of sedentary. Exerc. Sport
Sci. Rev. 36, 173178.
Pinto Pereira, S.M., Power, C., 2013. Sedentary behaviours in mid-adulthood and subsequent body mass index. PLoS One 8, e65791.
Stamatakis, E., Ekelund, U., Wareham, N.J., 2007. Temporal trends in physical activity in
England: the Health Survey for England 1991 to 2004. Prev. Med. 45, 416423.
Stock, S., Fernandes, R., Delisle, A., Vzina, N., 2005. Reproducibility and validity of
workers' self-reports of physical work demands. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 6,
409437.
Tudor-Locke, C., Leonardi, C., Johnson, W.D., Katzmarzyk, P.T., 2011. Time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors on the working day: the American time use survey. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 53, 13821387.
Van Uffelen, J.G., Wong, J., Chau, J.Y., et al., 2010. Occupational sitting and health risks: a
systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 39, 379388.
Who, 2006. Database on BMI [Online]. Available: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?
introPage=intro_3.html ([Accessed 21.04. 2013]).
Kelly, T., Yang, W., Chen, C.S., Reynolds, K., He, J., 2008. Global burden of obesity in 2005
and projections to 2030. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 32, 14311437.
Kwasniewska, M., Jegier, A., Kostka, T., et al., 2014. Long-term effect of different physical
activity levels on subclinical atherosclerosis in middle-aged men: a 25-year prospective study. PLoS One 9, e85209.
Lagersted-Olsen, J., Korshj, M., Skotte, J., Carneiro, I.G., Sgaard, K., Holtermann, A., 2013.
Comparison of objectively measured and self-reported time spent sitting. Int. J. Sports
Med.
Larsson, C.A., Kroll, L., Bennet, L., Gullberg, B., Rastam, L., Lindblad, U., 2012. Leisure time
and occupational physical activity in relation to obesity and insulin resistance: a
population-based study from the Skaraborg Project in Sweden.
Mummery, W.K., Schoeld, G.M., Steele, R., Eakin, E.G., Brown, W.J., 2005. Occupational
sitting time and overweight and obesity in Australian workers. Am. J. Prev. Med.
29, 9197.
Nyholm, M., Gullberg, B., Merlo, J., Lundqvist-Persson, C., Rstam, L., Lindblad, U., 2007.
The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: implications for
population studies. Obesity 15, 197208.
Owen, N., Sugiyama, T., Eakin, E.E., Gardiner, P.A., Tremblay, M.S., Sallis, J.F., 2011. Adults'
sedentary behavior determinants and interventions. Am. J. Prev. Med. 41, 189196.
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
Q5
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
N
C
O
R
O
376
Please cite this article as: Eriksen, D., et al., Sedentary workAssociations between ve-year changes in occupational sitting time and body mass
index, Prev. Med. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.038
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375