Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shear
Large strain
Small strain
Medium strain
p
p
Compression
Gtan
G0
Gsec
Unloading
&
reloading
Gsec
G0
log
Up to order of
(0.01% strain)
10-4
Load cell
Suction cap
Bender element
system
(also in other side
of soil specimen)
Mid-height PWP
transducer
Radial belt
Soil specimen
LVDTs
Porous stone
Tie rod
Drainage
Perspex wall
Ram
(Global)
displacement
transducer
Bearing
To oil/air interface
or CRS-pump
d external
axial_external =
d external
H0
Eexternal
=
axial
Load cell
axial_external
Specimen
axial_internal =
d internal
H 0
Einternal
=
axial
axial_internal
H0 H
0
d internal
Example of measurements
Note how different the magnitudes of stiffness are when measured externally and internally.
2u G 2u 3u
=
+
t 2 x 2 x 2 t
u (x)
hv
v (or z)
h (or r)
100
TE4: After consolidation
f = 9 kHz, vh-direction
Amplitude of signals in arbitrary units
hh
Input
Output
50
Beginning
of signal
-50
First arrival
t = 0.514 mSec
0.5
1.5
Time [mSec]
Passive
Ka
F
Active
Ca
Active
Active
Ka
(a) Fixed-free
Ca
(c) Free-free
(iii) Field
Shear wave velocity measurement: Cross-hole and down-hole methods
The principle of these field methods is same as that of bender element tests. A receiver
(and transmitter in down-hole methods) is placed inside a borehole, or if the soil is soft, it
may be installed in a penetration cone (seismic cone penetration test; SCPT).
These method measures shear wave
velocity, which is a body wave. There
are also techniques which use
surface wave (Reighley wave).
Cross-hole measurement
(Hight et al., 1997)
Down-hole measurement
(Hight et al., 1997)
10
100
200
Down-hole (BH407, North)*
Down-hole (BH407, East)*
Resonant column (rot. core)
Bender element
Resonant column
(range for blocks)
C
*Shear wave was transmitted
from two sides of borehole
20
10
0
Bii
Elevation [m OD]
Biii
20
30
Bi
-10
B1
40
-20
Lithological unit: A3
50
FinallyR
In old days, the stiffness moduli measured in dynamic and static tests used to be
considered two fundamentally different things due to the strain-rate effects, because the
dynamic moduli were always far larger than the static ones. After it was found that the
static moduli had been underestimated by global measurement, the agreement of the
moduli between dynamic and static tests has been seen (Tatsuoka & Shibuya, 1991).
One problem solved?
Cross-section
10
11
Testing pad
D
r
12
(Google 2011)
Cross-sections
13
Non-linear stiffness
Simulation cases
14
15
Settlement trough
Tunnel
excavated
2D FEM mesh
16
References
Addenbrooke, T.I., Potts, D.M. and Puzrin, A.M. (1997) The influence of pre-failure soil
stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnel construction, Geotechnique 47(3) 693-712.
Burland, J.B. and Hancock, R.J.R. (1977) Underground car park at the House of
Commons, London: Geotechnical aspects The Structural Engineer, The Journal of The
Institution of Structural Engineers 87-100.
Burland, J.B. and Symes, M. (1982) A simple axial displacement gauge for use in the
triaxial apparatus, Geotechnique 32(1) 62-65.
Cuccovillo, T. and Coop, M.R. (1997) The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial
tests using LVDTs, Geotechnique 47(1) 167-171.
Goto, S., Tatuoka, F., Shibuya, S. Kim, Y.-S. and Sato, T. (1991) A simple gauge for local
small strain measurements in the laboratory, Soils and Foundations 31 136-180.
Hight, D.W., Bennell, J.D., Chana, B., Davis, P.D., Jardine, R.J. and Porovic, E. (1997)
Wave velocity and stiffness measurements of the Crag and Lower London Tertiaries at
Sizewell, Geotechnique 47(3) 451-474.
Izumi, K., Ogihara, M., and Kameya, H. (1997) Displacement of bridge foundations on
sedimentary softrock; a case study on small strain stiffness, Geotechnique 47(3) 619632.
Jardine,R.J., Symes, M.J., and Burland, J.B. (1984) The measurement of soil stiffness in
the triaxial apparatus, Geotechnique 34(3) 323-340.
Jardine, R J, Lehane, B M, Smith, P,R and Gildea, P A (1995) Vertical loading
experiments on rigid pad foundations at Bothkennar, Geotechnique 45(4) 573-599.
Nishimura, S. (2006) Laboratory study on anisotropy of natural London Clay, PhD Thesis,
Imperial College London.
Simpson, B., ORiordan, N.J. and Croft, O.D. (1979) A computer model for the analysis of
ground movements in London clay, Goetechnique 29(2) 149-175.
Tatsuoka, F. and Shibuya, S. (1991) Deformation characteristics of soil and rocks from
field and laboratory tests, the 9th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Vol.1, 101-170.
Ward, W. H. & Burland, J. B. (1973). The use of ground strain measurements in civil
engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Sot. A274 421-428.
17