Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electronica
THE EVALUATION
OF GEOMETRICAL EFFECTS
IN FOUR POINT PROBE MEASUREMENTS
M. A. GREEN and M. W. GUNN
Electrical Engineering Department, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
(Received 2 December
1970; in revisedform
22 February
197 1)
Abstract-An
accurate numerical approach is presented for the evaluation of geometrical effects in
four point probe resistivity measurements upon semiconductors. The accuracy of the approach is
illustrated by comparing results obtained with correction factors tabulated for probe measurements
upon circular and rectangular geometries. Correction factors are presented for measurements with a
square probe array upon rectangular specimens.
The effect of increasing thickness for specimens of bounded geometry is also investigated. The
method allows four point probe measurements to be made not only with an arbitrary probe configuration but also upon thin specimens of an arbitrary geometry.
RCsmnC- On presente une approche numerique precise de Ievaluation des effets geomitriques dans
les prises de mesures de resistance specifique par sonde a quatre points sur les semi-conducteurs.
On demontre la precision de cette approche en comparant les resultats obtenus avec des facteurs de
correction catalog&
pour les mesures par sonde sur des geometries circulaires ou rectangulaires.
On presente des facteurs de correction pour les prises de mesures avec une serie de sondes carrtes
sur des Cchantillons rectangulaires. On examine aussi Ieffet dune augmentation depaisseur sur des
echantillons de geometric limitee. Cette methode permet deffectuer des prises de mesures a la
sonde a quatre points avec une configuration arbitraire de sonde ainsi que sur des Cchantillons de
geometric arbitraire.
Zusammenfassung- Fur Viersondenmessungen an Halbleitern werden genaue numerische Naherungen
zur Auswertung der Geometrieeffekte angegeben. Die Genauigkeit wird erlautert durch Vergleich
der mit den Korrekturfaktoren erzielten Ergebnisse mit denjenigen, die man mit tabellierten Faktoren
fur kreisformige und rechteckige Proben erhalt. Die Korrekturfaktoren zur Messung an rechteckigen
Proben mit einer quadratischen Sondenanordnung werden angegeben.
Der EinfluR zunehmender Probendicke bei fester Probengeometrie wird ebenfalls untersucht.
Die Methode ermiiglicht die Vierpunktmessung nicht nur fur eine beliebige Sondenanordnung sondern
such fur diinne Proben beliebiger Geometrie.
1. INTRODUCTION
THE
FOUR
point
probe
technique
presented
by
is that realised
by specimens
large in all three
dimensions
such as large bulk crystals. These
M. A. GREEN
1168
a nd M. W. GUNN
obtaining
a numerical
solution of the differential
equation
governing
the
potential
distribution
throughout
the semiconductor
specimen
using a
digital computer. This flexible technique has distinct
advantages
in its simplicity,
and in the fact that
arbitrary
probe configurations
and locations
can
be accommodated.
In addition,
this technique
allows four point probe measurements
to be made
upon specimens
of arbitrary
geometry,
thereby
providing an alternate method to the van der Pauw
peripheral
contact
method[9]
for
resistivity
measurements
upon such specimens.
Fig. 1. Linear
DIFFERENCE
distribution
APPROACH
rend boundmy
conditions
v.
!kC/i
P
-0
(I)
If the conductor
is isotropic and homogeneous,
p is constant
throughout
the conductor.
and this
relation reduces to Laplaces equation
[7]. Extensive
tables have been prepared by Swartzendruber [8] and Logan [5] for measurements
upon
circular
and rectangular
2 dimensional
geometries
respectively.
The technique
used by the above workers has
been based in general upon the method of current
images. This method introduces
elliptic functions
for the conformal
transformation
of rectangular
geometries
to more suitable planes. The work of
Hansen[7].
however,
was based on calculating
the potential distribution
throughout
the geometry
of interest by solving Laplaces equation using the
separation
of variables
technique.
Solutions
obtained
by this technique
were in the form of
slowly convergent
infinite series.
This paper presents
an attractive
technique
for
the evaluation
of these geometrical
effects
by
perpendicular
to the
FOUR
\/
/\
POINT
PROBE
LJ
1169
MEASUREMENTS
(6)
(b)
(a)
;--+-$
I
12
t--
lo
14
L7-_
IF
1170
M. A. GREEN
Another relationship
and
M. W. GUNN
-g=pJ,
+6h*Vl+O(hX)
(7)
(8)
If the boundary condition
can be approximated by
given by equation
v, + I:,
pJ,
-g=
(16)
(3)
(9)
+ 0
(IO)
9 point formula is
4(l,+21/,+l,)+2l;+21i,-20l,,
+ 0 (1 I)
X
I
6
2l~+2l~--4l,,
+ 0
and
sv, + sv, + 4v, - 2ov,, - 0
(13)
of current
calculation
(12)
(14)
FOUR
R=f(V,+V*+V,+v~)-vV,
(17)
(18)
1171
results
suitable
for the
4.2209
3.36248
10
Extrapolated
result
3.5098
(3.50975)
Circular
specimen
Square
specimen
Analytical
solution?
(K).for
3.1134
(3.11343)
Probe spacing
fclctors
Side length
or diameter
Tuble 1. Correction
method[7]).
3.36244
3.35514
3.36074
3.36169
/,,
1.2 X 10-E
2.2 X 10-l
5.2 x 1lF
2.4 x 10-2
4
8
12
2
4
10
12
2
4
8
12
3.2 x lo-*
negligible
2.6 x 10-l
1.6 x lo-
9.0 x IO-1
negligible
3.11342
3.11343
3.5008
3.50918
3.50972
3.90975
3.1 x 10-l
2.1 x lo-
2
4
4.2080
4.2200
geometries
Mesh intervals
between probes
2.5 x 10-L
2.9 x lo-
% Error
3.11296
3.11334
Computed
by this method
111
421
931
121
441
441
625
36
121
441
963
25
81
total no.
of nodes
,/
120
120
270
80
210
1.50
120
80
100
150
400
100
100
No. of
iterations
IO--
lo-
10-6
IO-6
10-S
lo-
2x 10-7
9x 10-j
2 x lo-s
8 x 10ms
3 x 10-6
2x
6x
3x
3x
1x
1x
4x 10-e
6 x IO-
Sum of
residues
.3
5
Z
c!
Z
Z
p:
Z
FOUR
Table 2. Correction
factors
POINT
PROBE
= 4
s
1173
MEASUREMENTS
Circular
specimen
1.0
1.25
1.5
1.75
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
5.0
7.0
10.0
-00
a/d=
1.0
4.5324
4.5477
4.6508
4.8526
5.1168
5.7028
6.25 16
7.0969
7.6504
8.2581
86434
9.0647
4.5437
4.6778
49052
5.4593
6.0052
6.8803
7.4739
8.1442
8.5795
9.0647
a/d = 1.2
2.8667
3.3358
3.7832
4.2321
4.6701
54677
6.1273
7.0662
76495
8.2694
8.6528
9.0647
located
specimen
a/d=
1.5
2.0936
2.7101
3.3044
3.8710
4.3988
5.3127
6.0373
7.0350
7.6392
8.26%
8.655 1
9.0647
on 2 dimensional
(Fig. 2)
a/d = 2.0
a/d = 4.0
1.7822
24454
3.0939
3.7070
4.2716
5.2358
5.98%
7.0156
7.6306
8.2680
8.6550
9.0647
1.7076
2.3810
3.0418
36658
4.2391
5.2157
5.9773
7.0102
7.6281
8.2673
8.6549
9.0647
070
I
025
I
05
I
0.75
I
125
I.0
\\
I.5
175
20
U/8
array
with
(cl
then
node configuration;
(b) Eight
(c)Twelve
point set.
set:
Combining
SSEVol.
point
14.No.
II-H
= 24f,+6hVV+O(ha)
(20)
= 56V,+ 12hZV2f+O(hS)
(21)
produces
an
= 12W0+O(hs)
(22)
M. A. GREEN
1174
and M. W. GUNN
Table 3. Correction factors (K) for linear probe array on square specimens
Side length
6
Probe spacing = s
Mesh intervals
between probes
48
245
700
1521
Extrapolated
5
Total no.
of nodes
results
I08
605
Extrapolated results
tobtained
15 Point result
2 2402
2.2471
2.2479
2.2484
3.1804
X2835
3.291
of thickness w = s (Fig. I )
27 Point result
Analytical
solution?
2.2222
2.2465
2.2480
2.2484
3.2644
2.2483
3.2922
analytically.
The boundary nodes and the solution
of the finite difference
equations
are treated
analogously
to the two dimensional
problems.
4.2 The effect qfsample thickness
The effect of increasing sample thickness on the
accuracy
of four point probe correction
factors
has been investigated
previously
for the case of
infinite
sheets
of uniform
thickness.
Smits[2]
expressed
the resistivity
of an infinite sheet of
uniform thickness,
IQ. for a linear probe in the form
(23)
where s is the probe spacing, and F(w/s) is a thickness factor which approaches
unity as nlapproaches
zero.
Smits suggested
as an approximation
to the
more complex case of a geometry
bounded in all
three dimensions.
the expression
became
large compared
with the probe spacing,
the approximation
improved.
This result would be
expected
to hold for other three dimensional
geometries
of uniform
thickness.
In general,
the
approximation
given by Smits would yield a value
of resistivity
lower than the theoretically
correct
value.
5. SPECIMENS OF ARBITRARY GEOMETRY
As it was found difficult to fit the basic linear or
square probe army to a polar mesh when the array
was located arbitrarily, the use of a square mesh for
a curved body was investigated
for two dimensional
geometries.
The simplest approach is to cover the
geometry
of interest
by a square mesh and to
approximate
the specimen
boundary
by mesh
lines and mesh diagonals.
This linear approximation to the specimen
boundary
produced
results
better than a few percent
accurate
for circular
specimens.
However
a more elegant technique
developed
by Viswanathan
[ 151 produced
results
at least an order of magnitude
more accurate for
the same mesh size. This method
is outlined
below.
An arbitrary geometry covered by a square mesh
produces nodes mostly surrounded
by nodes within
the boundary
(Fig. 8). These were called interior
modes and can be treated
by the usual finite
difference
techniques.
The classes of nodes with
only 3 node and 2 nodes within one mesh interval
lying inside the boundary
were labelled edge and
corner nodes respectively.
Consider
a typical
edge node (Fig. 9). The
approach
used by Viswanathan
produces
a finite
difference formula for this node in the form
FOUR
POINT
PROBE
(aj
117.5
MEASUREMENTS
(b)
where
1+m*
A = l-m+2el_mZ+ep,
h mq(l
+m*)
l-m
=o
(26)
>
But since 0 is surrounded
c=
I+m+2rw&~y(:+mm2)
PA
by 0,3,7,4,
we have
v; =I(v,+v,+v,+v,)
(27)
D = 4 1 +e~+e;~!m;))
(
(4A-D)V3+(4B-D)V,+(4C-D)V,
pA = radius of curvature
A (Fig. 9).
E, h, a are defined in Fig. 9.
m= tana
-DV,=O
(28)
M. A. GREEN
1176
and
were calculated
from geometrical
input data and
stored in a matrix form, the relevant
set being
brought into the iteration scheme when a boundary
node was reached by the relaxation process [ 141.
This method
required
the recording
of the
quantities,
p, E, and OLin addition to a basic mesh
description
as required
by the mesh line and
diagonal approximation.
To illustrate the accuracy
of this approach,
results obtained
for both linear
and square probe array measurements
upon circular
specimens
using the technique
are presented
in
Table 4. By comparison
with those obtained for
circular specimens
using a polar mesh (Table I),
it can be seen that this method produces results at
least as accurate
as the previous
technique
for a
given number of nodes, and has the advantage that
both arbitrary
geometries
and arbitrary
probe
locations
on these
geometries
can be accommodated.
6. DISCUSSION
The techniques
discussed
in this paper were
incorporated
into programmes
written in FORTRAN IV. Using a PDP 10 digital computer, computation time was approximately
20 set for typical
problems
involving
about 400 node points,
although efficiency was improved for larger problems
using mesh halving techniques.
The optimum value
of relaxation factor, 2 [equation (18)] was found to
be 1.86 for rectangular
specimens.
In some cases,
it was possible to take advantage
of problem symmetry to reduce the number of nodes required as
was possible in preparing the results of Table I.
In the application
of numerical techniques
to the
four point probe problem, the particular technique
chosen
was appealing
because
of the simplicity
Table
4. Correction
Probe
array
factor
Diameter
Probe spacing
(K)
d
= s
for
*Advantage
circular specimens
geometries
Computed
solution
by this
method
4
5
2.9289
3.3625
10
2
5
4.1716
49052
7.4739
Analytical
Linear
array
Square
array
M. W. GUNN
2.9292
3.3591
3.3641
3.3637
4.1730
4.8997
7.4777
obtained
using
programme
Mesh intervals
between probes
for
arbitrury
Approx. no
of nodes
% Error
I.0 x
1.0 x
4.8 x
3.6 x
3.4 x
1.1 x
5.1 x
10-z
IO-
IO-
lOmy
IF
10-l
I@
10
4
4
8
4
10
4
330 f
220
85 .
330.
330-F
330
330
FOUR
POlNT
PROBE
the solution of Laplaces equation over 2 dimensional regions with Dirichlet or Neumann (or a
combination of both) types of boundary conditions.
In the present context, this method would
possibly increase efficiency for 2 dimensional
problems (regular and arbitrary geometries) with
the sacrifice of the simple algorithm described, but
the number of boundary nodes required to describe
3 dimensional specimens would be excessive. More
importantly for the more general boundary conditions which arise when obtaining Hall effect
measurements using the four point probe[ 131, the
finite difference technique described in this paper
can be used with negligible change in solution
algorithm [ 141.
7. CONCLUSION
1177
MEASUREMENTS