Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Person A (rows)
Person B
MBTI
(columns)
socionics
ENTP
ISFJ
ESFJ
INTP
ENFJ
ISTP
ESTP
INFJ
ESFP
INTJ
ENTJ
ISFP
ESTJ
INFP
ENFP
ISTJ
ILE = ENTp
SEI = ISFp
ESE = ESFj
LII = INTj
EIE = ENFj
LSI = ISTj
SLE = ESTp
IEI = INFp
SEE = ESFp
ILI = INTp
LIE = ENTj
ESI = ISFj
LSE = ESTj
EII = INFj
IEE = ENFp
SLI = ISTp
ENTP
ILE = ENTp
ISFJ
SEI = ISFp
ESFJ
ESE = ESFj
INTP
LII = INTj
ENFJ
EIE = ENFj
ISTP
LSI = ISTj
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
ESTP
INFJ
SLE = ESTp IEI = INFp
ESFP
SEE = ESFp
INTJ
ILI = INTp
ENTJ
LIE = ENTj
ISFP
ESI = ISFj
ESTJ
LSE = ESTj
INFP
EII = INFj
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
http://www.socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm
http://pstypes.blogspot.com/2009/03/myers-briggs-compatibility-part-1.html
http://www.sociotype.com
Homo/Heter
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Symm/Asym
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Asymmetrical
Asymmetrical
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Look-alike
Lkl
Homoverted
Symmetrical
Rhythmical
Illusionary
Ill
Heteroverted
Symmetrical
Rhythmical
Super-Ego
Contrary
Quasi-identical
Conflicting
Benefit ^
Supervision ^
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Asymmetrical
Asymmetrical
Rhythmical
Rhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Comparative
Cmp
Homoverted
Symmetrical
Rhythmical
Sdl
Heteroverted
Symmetrical
Rhythmical
Identical
Duality
Activity
Mirror
Benefit <
Supervision <
Semi-dual
PersonalityPage
Keirsey
Pierce (CelebrityTypes)
Rhythmical
Rhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
INTP
= LII = INTj
Thinker
ESI = ISFj
LIE = ENTj
ILI = INTp
SEE = ESFp
SLI = ISTp
IEE = ENFp
LSI = ISTj
(p > j)
(p > j)
(p > j)
(if p)
(if j)
(if p)
(if j)
(j > p)
(j > p)
Dominant
D
i
T
A
~A
~T
INFP
ESTJ
~I
~D
A
T
ISFP
ENTJ
INTJ
ESFP
ISTJ
ENFP
ISTP
~I
~D
~A
~T
T
A
D
ENFJ
(if p)
(j > p)
(j > p)
(j > p)
(if j)
Stack A vs. B
Auxiliary
Tertiary
A
T
T
A
I
D
D
I
~D
~I
~I
~D
Inferior
I
D
A
T
~T
~A
Dominant
D
i
T
A
T
A
Inferior
I
D
A
T
A
T
T
A
~D
~I
~I
~D
A
T
T
A
~D
~I
~T
~A
~D
~I
~D
~I
~T
~A
~T
~I
~D
~I
~D
~A
~D
~I
~T
~A
A
T
I
~I
~D
~A
~T
~A
~T
D
~T
~A
~D
~I
I
D
~T
~A
~T
~I
~D
D
I
~A
~D
~I
~T
~A
~T
~A
I
~A
~T
~A
~T
(if p)
EIE = ENFj
(if p)
(if j)
(if p)
(if j)
ISFJ
ESFJ
INTP
ENFJ
ISTP
ESTP
INFJ
ESFP
INTJ
ENTJ
ISFP
ESTJ
INFP
ENFP
ISTJ
SEI = ISFp
Nurturer
Protector
ESE = ESFj
Caregiver
Provider
LII = INTj
Thinker
Architect
EIE = ENFj
Giver
Teacher
LSI = ISTj
Mechanic
Crafter
SLE = ESTp
Doer
Promoter
IEI = INFp
Protector
Counselor
ILI = INTp
Scientist
Mastermind
LIE = ENTj
Executive
Field Marshal
EII = INFj
Idealist
Healer
IEE = ENFp
Inspirer
Champion
SLI = ISTp
Duty Fulfiller
Inspector
Guardian
Cooperator
Abstractionist
Complier?
Dreamer
Searcher
Solidifier?
Bonvivant /
Enthusiast
Facilitator
Caretaker
Critic /
Mastermind
Designer
Theorizer
Rationalist,
Philosopher
ESI = ISFj
Artist
Composer
Expressive
artist
Mediator /
Peacemaker
Composer
Producer
LSE = ESTj
Guardian
Supervisor
Originator
SEE = ESFp
Performer
Performer
Vibrant
LifeAffirmer
Politician /
Ambassador
Motivator
Presenter
Lyricist /
Romantic
Harmonizer
Clarifier
Psychologist /
Reporter
Discoverer
Advocate
PeaceMaker,
Harmonizer
Inspector /
Pragmatist
Planner
Inspector
Curator,
Reporter
Ne
Fi
Te
Si
Si
Te
Fi
Ne
Joiner
Persuader
Masterer?
Conquerer
Teacher
Envisioner
Mentor
Craftsman /
Mechanic
Analyzer
Operator
Humanist /
Empath
Foreseer
Developer
Counselor
Artisan
Legionnaire /
Conqueror
Promoter
Executor
Politician,
Entrepreneur
Ti
Se
Ni
Fe
Se
Ti
Fe
Ni
Ni
Fe
Ti
Se
Se
Fi
Te
Ni
Ni
Te
Fi
Se
Te
Ni
Se
Fi
Fi
Se
Ni
Te
Te
Si
Ne
Fi
Fi
Ne
Si
Te
Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1
Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4
Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3
Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2
Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2
Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3
2.0%
6.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
10.0%
4.5%
Mentor / Actor
Si
Fe
Ti
Ne
Fe
Si
Ne
Ti
Ti
Ne
Si
Fe
Fe
Ni
Se
Ti
Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic
Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4
Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1
Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2
Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3
Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3
3.5%
11.5%
11.0%
4.0%
3.5%
29% Green
39% White
33% Red
% general popn
(p > j)
(p > j)
INTP
ESFJ
ISFJ
ENTP
INFJ
ESTP
Ne
Ti
Fe
Si
INTP's B-type
(if j)
Dominant = 1
Auxilliary = 2
Tertiary = 3
Inferior = 4
another
Stack B vs. A
Auxiliary
Tertiary
A
T
T
A
I
D
D
I
I
D
D
I
P/J
ENTP
Seeker /
Guardian /
Inventor
Conservator
Explorer
Protector
Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Inventor
Supporter
Scientist,
Advocate, Poet
another
ThoughtLeader
For:
EII = INFj
LSE = ESTj
Altered Variables
N/S
T/F
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
E/I
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
ILE = ENTp
Visionary
Inventor
Socionics
LII = INTj
ESE = ESFj
SEI = ISFp
ILE = ENTp
IEI = INFp
SLE = ESTp
ENFP
ISTJ
IEE = ENFp SLI = ISTp
Cmp
Sp <
Comparative Supervision<
Neighbor
Counterpart
1:1
1:2
4:4
4:3
2:~3
2:~4
3:~2
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
5.0%
4.5%
Page 1
Ethicist
Wizard
Analyst /
Scientist
Conceptualizer
Director
Designer,
SensationSeeker
Investigator
Subjugator
Enterpriser /
Pioneer
Strategist
Mobilizer
Manager,
Mechanic
Administrator /
Director
Implementor
Supervisor
Soldier /
Expressionist
OrgnMan
Dreamer
Sp ^
Bn ^
Supervision^
Benefit^
Tribesman
Suitemate
1:~3
1:~2
4:~2
4:~3
2:1
2:4
3:4
3:1
asymmetric asymmetric
1:2
1:3
4:3
4:2
2:~4
2:~1
3:~1
3:~4
7.0%
12.5%
NF relationships
ENTP
ISFJ
ESFJ
INTP
ENFJ
ISTP
ESTP
INFJ
ESFP
INTJ
ENTJ
ISFP
ESTJ
INFP
ENFP
ISTJ
PersonalityPage
Keirsey
ENTp
Visionary
Inventor
ISFp
Nurturer
Protector
ESFj
Caregiver
Provider
INTj
Thinker
Architect
ENFj
Giver
Teacher
ISTj
Mechanic
Crafter
ESTp
Doer
Promoter
INFp
Protector
Counselor
INTp
Scientist
Mastermind
ENTj
Executive
Field Marshal
INFj
Idealist
Healer
ENFp
Inspirer
Champion
ISTp
Duty Fulfiller
Inspector
Originator
Guardian
Cooperator
Abstractionist
Complier?
Dreamer
Searcher
Solidifier?
Bonvivant /
Enthusiast
Facilitator
Caretaker
Critic /
Mastermind
Designer
Theorizer
Rationalist,
Philosopher
ISFj
Artist
Composer
Expressive
artist
Mediator /
Peacemaker
Composer
Producer
ESTj
Guardian
Supervisor
Pierce (CelebrityTypes)
ESFp
Performer
Performer
Vibrant
LifeAffirmer
Politician /
Ambassador
Motivator
Presenter
Lyricist /
Romantic
Harmonizer
Clarifier
Psychologist /
Reporter
Discoverer
Advocate
PeaceMaker,
Harmonizer
Inspector /
Pragmatist
Planner
Inspector
Curator,
Reporter
Seeker /
Guardian /
Inventor
Conservator
Explorer
Protector
Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Inventor
Supporter
Scientist,
Advocate,
Poet
another
ThoughtLeader
Socionics
Dominant = 1
Auxilliary = 2
Tertiary = 3
Inferior = 4
Ne
Ti
Fe
Si
Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic
another
ENFP
= IEE = ENFp
ENFJ
Ethicist
Dreamer
Ni
Fe
Ti
Se
Se
Fi
Te
Ni
Ni
Te
Fi
Se
Te
Ni
Se
Fi
Fi
Se
Ni
Te
Te
Si
Ne
Fi
Fi
Ne
Si
Te
Ne
Fi
Te
Si
Si
Te
Fi
Ne
Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2
Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3
Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3
Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2
Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1
Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4
Sp <
Supervision<
Counterpart
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3
Cmp
Comparative
Neighbor
1:1
4:4
2:~3
3:~2
Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2
Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3
Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4
Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1
3.5%
11.5%
11.0%
4.0%
3.5%
5.0%
4.5%
2.0%
6.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
10.0%
4.5%
7.0%
12.5%
Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2
Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3
Sp ^
Supervision^
Tribesman
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1
Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4
Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1
Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2
Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3
Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3
Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1
Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4
Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3
Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2
3.5%
11.5%
11.0%
4.0%
3.5%
5.0%
4.5%
2.0%
6.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
10.0%
4.5%
7.0%
12.5%
Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3
Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1
Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2
Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3
Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3
Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2
Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4
Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3
Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2
11.5%
11.0%
3.5%
Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic
Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
another
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
22% Green
2:4
43% White
3:1
36% Red
% general popn
Artisan
Administrator /
Director
Implementor
Supervisor
Soldier /
Expressionist
OrgnMan
Se
Ti
Fe
Ni
28% Green
32% White
40% Red
= EIE = ENFj
Counselor
Subjugator
Enterpriser /
Pioneer
Strategist
Mobilizer
Manager,
Mechanic
Ti
Se
Ni
Fe
Socionics
Cmp
Sociotype Comparative
TypeLogic Neighbor
1:1
4:4
another
2:~3
3:~2
% general popn
Envisioner
Mentor
Wizard
Analyst /
Scientist
Conceptualizer
Director
Designer,
SensationSeeker
Investigator
Fe
Ni
Se
Ti
21% Green
44% White
36% Red
% general popn
Teacher
Humanist /
Empath
Foreseer
Developer
Ti
Ne
Si
Fe
Sp ^
Socionics
Sociotype Supervision^
TypeLogic Tribesman
another
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
29% Green
2:~4
43% White
3:~1
28% Red
INFJ
Conquerer
Legionnaire /
Conqueror
Promoter
Executor
Politician,
Entrepreneur
Fe
Si
Ne
Ti
INFP
= IEI = INFp
Masterer?
Craftsman /
Mechanic
Analyzer
Operator
Si
Fe
Ti
Ne
= EII = INFj
% general popn
Joiner
Persuader
Mentor / Actor
3.5%
Sp <
Cmp
Supervision< Comparative
Counterpart
Neighbor
1:2
1:1
4:3
4:4
2:~4
2:~3
3:~1
3:~2
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
11.5%
11.0%
Sp <
Qid
Supervision< Quasi-ident
Counterpart Complement
1:2
1:~2
4:3
4:~3
2:~4
2:~1
3:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
Cmp
Sp <
Comparative Supervision<
Neighbor
Counterpart
1:1
1:2
4:4
4:3
2:~3
2:~4
3:~2
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
Sp ^
Act
Supervision^
Activity
Tribesman Supplement
1:~3
1:3
4:~2
4:2
2:1
2:4
3:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1
4.0%
3.5%
5.0%
4.5%
2.0%
6.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
10.0%
4.5%
7.0%
12.5%
Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3
Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3
Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2
Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1
Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4
Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
Sp ^
Supervision^
Tribesman
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1
Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3
Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2
Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2
Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3
Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4
Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1
4.0%
3.5%
5.0%
4.5%
2.0%
6.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
10.0%
4.5%
7.0%
12.5%
Page 2
do not overwrite
these formulas
PersonalityPage
Giver
Executive
Caregiver
Guardian
Inspirer
Visionary
Doer
Performer
Protector
Scientist
Duty Fulfiller
Nurturer
Idealist
Thinker
Artist
Mechanic
Keirsey
Teacher
Field Marshal
Provider
Supervisor
Champion
Inventor
Promoter
Performer
Counselor
Mastermind
Inspector
Protector
Healer
Architect
Composer
Crafter
Pierce (CelebrityTypes)
Persuader
Subjugator
Cooperator
Complier?
Searcher
Originator
Conquerer
Vibrant LifeAffirmer
Teacher
Wizard
Solidifier?
Guardian
Dreamer
Abstractionist
Expressive artist
Masterer?
Socionics
Mentor / Actor
Enterpriser / Pioneer
Bonvivant / Enthusiast
Administrator / Director
Psychologist / Reporter
Seeker / Inventor
Legionnaire / Conqueror
Politician / Ambassador
Humanist / Empath
Analyst / Scientist
Inspector / Pragmatist
Guardian / Conservator
Lyricist / Romantic
Critic / Mastermind
Mediator / Peacemaker
Craftsman / Mechanic
Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Envisioner Mentor
Strategist Mobilizer
Facilitator Caretaker
Implementor Supervisor
Discoverer Advocate
Explorer Inventor
Promoter Executor
Motivator Presenter
Foreseer Developer
Conceptualizer Director
Planner Inspector
Protector Supporter
Harmonizer Clarifier
Designer Theorizer
Composer Producer
Analyzer Operator
See, also:
http://www.personalitypage.com/html/portraits.html
http://www.typelogic.com/intp.html
http://keirsey.com/
http://similarminds.com/personality_types.html
http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/INTP
http://personalityjunkie.com/the-intp/
http://www.preludecharacteranalysis.com/types
http://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/16Types/16Types.cfm
http://lenore-exegesis.com/
http://www.personalitypathways.com/faces.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSNTdSSLauQ
http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/intro.asp
http://tap3x.net/EMBTI/charts.html
http://www.enneagram.net/instsub.html
https://www.enneagramworldwide.com/instinctual-subtypes/
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Model_A
http://www.davidmarkley.com/personality
http://testyourself.psychtests.com/testid/2143
http://personality-testing.info/tests/BIG5.php
http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/research/publications/reports/mscs/mscs07-04.pdf
http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2011/01/jungian-functions-at-a-glance
http://www.socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm
http://pstypes.blogspot.com/2009/03/myers-briggs-compatibility-part-1.html
http://personalityinstitute.tripod.com/mbtiresearchreport.htm
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/evaluating-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator-psychology-essay.php
http://people.wku.edu/richard.miller/MBTI%20reliability%20validity.pdf
https://gustavus.edu/psychology/files/Larson.pdf?origin=publication_detail
http://www.academia.edu/11245391/A_CORRELATIONAL_STUDY_OF_EXPLICIT_AND_IMPLICIT_PERSONALITY_TESTS
http://harvey.psyc.vt.edu/Documents/BessHarveySwartzSIOP2003.pdf
http://www.typeinsights.com/FreeArticles/Relationships.pdf
http://www.interactionstyles.com/
http://www.personalityhacker.com/podcast-episode-0019-models-of-personality-development/
RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23
Page 1
another label
Enneagram?
Socionics
Counselor
2,1
Ethical Intuitive Extravert (EIE)
Manager, Mechanic
8
Logical Intuitive Extravert (LIE)
Joiner
2,3
Ethical Sensory Extravert (ESE)
8
Soldier / OrgnMan
Logical Sensory Extravert (LSE)
PeaceMaker, Harmonizer
7
Intuitive Ethical Extravert (IEE)
3
Scientist, ThoughtLeader
Intuitive Logical Extravert (ILE)
Politician, Entrepreneur
3,7
Sensory Logical Extravert (SLE)
7
SensationSeeker
Sensory Ethical Extravert (SEE)
Ethicist
4
Intuitive Ethical Introvert (IEI)
Designer, Investigator
5
Intuitive Logical Introvert (ILI)
Curator, Reporter
1
Sensory Logical Introvert (SLI)
Advocate, Poet
6,1,9
Sensory Ethical Introvert (SEI)
Dreamer
4
Ethical Intuitive Introvert (EII)
Rationalist, Philosopher
5
Logical Intuitive Introvert (LII)
Expressionist
2,9,4
Ethical Sensory Introvert (ESI)
Artisan
5
Logical Sensory Introvert (LSI)
Popn %
3.5%
3.5%
11.0%
10.0%
7.0%
3.5%
4.5%
6.5%
2.0%
3.0%
12.5%
11.5%
4.5%
4.0%
7.0%
5.0%
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
Dichotomy Characteristics
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
another label
Counselor
Manager, Mechanic
Joiner
Soldier / OrgnMan
PeaceMaker, Harmonizer
Scientist, ThoughtLeader
Politician, Entrepreneur
SensationSeeker
Ethicist
Designer, Investigator
Curator, Reporter
Advocate, Poet
Dreamer
Rationalist, Philosopher
Expressionist
Artisan
Berens group
Catalysts
Theorists
Stabilizers
Stabilizers
Catalysts
Theorists
Improvisers
Improvisers
Catalysts
Theorists
Stabilizers
Stabilizers
Catalysts
Theorists
Improvisers
Improvisers
Markley group
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Traditionalists
Traditionalists
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Experiencers
Experiencers
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Traditionalists
Traditionalists
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Experiencers
Experiencers
Keirsey Values?
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Duties and responsibilities
Duties and responsibilities
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Whatever works
Whatever works
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Duties and responsibilities
Duties and responsibilities
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Whatever works
Whatever works
Keirsey Temperaments
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Cooperators
Concrete Cooperators
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Cooperators
Concrete Cooperators
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
On this page and the next, certain general characteristics of groups below are mapped into individual types above.
Some Characacteristics of Dichotomies (i.e., each letter has a single meaning independent of other letters with which it appears; effects are simply additive)
E
I
S
N
F
T
P
J
E: responsive
I: individualistic
S: concrete
Information: Sensing vs. Intuition
N: abstract
F: passionate
Decisions: Feeling vs. Thinking
T: dispassionate
P: fluid
Structure: Perceiving vs. Judging
J: structured
Focus: Extroverted vs. Introverted
social
asocial???
experiential
mental
unstructured
rigid???
spontaneous
deliberate
solitary
direct
mediated
Popn %
cooperative
uncooperative???
50%
50%
68%
31%
53%
46%
42%
57%
These letters, indicating results from the official test, are the only fixed points. Everything else is interpretation, which is often ambiguous, conflated, specious and, of course, inconsistent.
Some Groupings using Dichotomies (visualized as rotations of oblique axes in 4-space or higher-order-space up to 8-space using Type Dynamics)
_S_J =
_S_P =
_NT_ =
_NF_ =
K-M
SJ
SP
NT
NF
Keirsey Temperaments
Guardians
Concrete Cooperators
Artisans
Concrete Utilitarians
Rationals
Abstract Utilitarians
Idealists
Abstract Cooperators
Keirsey Values?
Duties and responsibilities
Whatever works
Emend rules and conventions
Personal code of ethics
IS__ =
IN__ =
ES__ =
EN__ =
Berens
Stabilizers
Improvisers
Theorists
Catalysts
Markley
Traditionalists
Experiencers
Conceptualizers
Idealists
Analyticals
Drivers
Amiables
Expressives
Page 2
Keirsey?
security seeking
sensation seeking
knowledge seeking
identity seeking
Popn %
45%
23%
14%
17%
36%
14%
32%
18%
K-M
NF
NT
SJ
SJ
NF
NT
SP
SP
NF
NT
SJ
SJ
NF
NT
SP
SP
Fe:
Te:
Fe:
Te:
Ne:
Ne:
Se:
Se:
Ni:
Ni:
Si:
Si:
Fi:
Ti:
Fi:
Ti:
Dominant
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Ni:
Ni:
Si:
Si:
Fi:
Ti:
Ti:
Fi:
Fe:
Te:
Te:
Fe:
Ne:
Ne:
Se:
Se:
Auxiliary
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Se:
Se:
Ne:
Ne:
Te:
Fe:
Fe:
Te:
Ti:
Fi:
Fi:
Ti:
Si:
Si:
Ni:
Ni:
Many theorists agree that we all have all eight functions that we use in different situations. Absent any additionally imposed structure, 8
functions would have over 40,000 permutations. MBTI is one such structure. Berens expands MBTI. Socionics goes in another direction.
Jungian Function Stack with Type Dynamics (i.e., letters' meanings depend on other letters)
Popn%
5%
11%
24%
11%
9%
14%
12%
15%
Tertiary
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Ti:
Fi:
Ti:
Fi:
Si:
Si:
Ni:
Ni:
Se:
Se:
Ne:
Ne:
Te:
Fe:
Te:
Fe:
Inferior
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Fe
Te
Fe
Te
Ne
Ne
Se
Se
Ni
Ni
Si
Si
Fi
Ti
Fi
Ti
Ni
Ni
Si
Si
Fi
Ti
Ti
Fi
Fe
Te
Te
Fe
Ne
Ne
Se
Se
Se
Se
Ne
Ne
Te
Fe
Fe
Te
Ti
Fi
Fi
Ti
Si
Si
Ni
Ni
Inferior
Ti
Fi
Ti
Fi
Si
Si
Ni
Ni
Se
Se
Ne
Ne
Te
Fe
Te
Fe
Ni: Normative theory drives curiosity. Fill in the blanks. Evolving, tight-mesh set of abstractions assimilate new (even
paradoxical) observations. (Hidden) meanings are illuminated by theory. (Random effects model. Plato's Forms?)
Ne: Connections between new and old ideas drives curiosity. Connect the dots.
Might say:
If only...
This is how the universe works
This is how the world works
Enjoy! It is what it is....
Try it this way. (This ought to work.)
Do it my way (the right way)
Feel my joy/pain
I feel your joy/pain
21%
29%
22%
28%
I__P =
I__J =
E__P =
E__J =
Page 3
Interpreting
Appraising
Opportunistic
Conformist
Ji
Pi
Pe
Je
Pe
Je
Ji
Pi
Pi
Ji
Je
Pe
Inferior
Je
Pe
Pi
Ji
on
xtroverted}
inant.
N/S
T/F
J/P
pct
3.5%
11.0%
10.0%
7.0%
3.5%
4.5%
6.5%
2.0%
3.0%
12.5%
11.5%
4.5%
4.0%
7.0%
5.0%
3.5%
Sum - pct
T/F
N/S
Total Result
Total Result
53% 46% 99%
Sum - pct
J/P
E/I
Total Result
F
ESFJ
ENFJ
ISFJ INFJ
Total Result
57% 42% 99%
ry
ion ia
rs xill
ve u
ro t a
int inan
m
do
ESFP
ISFP
ISTP
ESTP
ENFP
INFP
INTP
ENTP
ISTJ INTJ
Sum - pct
J/P
N/S
on t
rsi an
ve in
tro om
ex ry d
illa
ux
Total Result
ESTJ
ENTJ
Total Result
57% 42% 99%
Sum - pct
J/P
T/F
Total Result
Total Result
57% 42% 99%
Sum - pct
N/S
E/I
Total Result
Page 4
Enneagram
Center
Instinct
Feeling
Thinking
Type
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Behaviors
self-confident, decisive, willful, confrontational
receptive, reassuring, complacent, resigned
principled, purposeful, self-controlled, perfectionist
generous, demonstrative, people-pleasing, possessive
adaptable, excelling, driven, image-conscious
expressive, dramatic, self-absorbed, temperamental
perceptive, innovative, secretive, isolated
engaging, responsible, anxious, suspicious
spontaneous, versatile, acquisitive, scattered
Riso-Hudson
Challenger
Peacemaker
Reformer
Helper
Achiever
Individualist
Investigator
Loyalist
Enthusiast
Palmer-Daniels
Protector
Mediator
Perfectionist
Giver
Performer
Romantic
Observer
Loyal Skeptic
Epicure
Social
Group Leader
Community Benefactor
Social Reformer
Ambassador
Politician
Critical Commentator
Profesor
Social Guardian
Utopian Visionary
Levels of Development
1
Liberation
2
Psychological Capacity
Healthy
3
Social Value
4
Imbalance / Social Role
5
Interpersonal Control
Average
6
Overcompensation
7
Violation
8
Obsession and Corruption
Unhealthy
9
Pathological Destructiveness
See:
https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/how-the-enneagram-system-works/
https://www.enneagramworldwide.com/instinctual-subtypes/
http://www.projectevolove.com/education/1/general-concepts
Page 1
Sexual
Commander
Seeker
Evangelist
Lover
Movie Star
Dramatic Person
Secret Agent
Warrior
Adventurer
Socionics
Socionics Function #, name
MBTI #,name
Socionics pattern
1 = Dominant
1 = Leading
2 = creative, secondary
2 = Auxiliary
2 = Support
3 = role
--m
4 = vulnerable, sensitive
inverts 1
8 = demonstrative, background
inverts 2
Socionics dichotomies
accepting
Ti
(independent,
fixed)
Ti
Ne
(dependent,
variable)
producing
mental
strong
valued
mental
strong
valued
(conscious)
8 = Devilish
inverts 4
Se
Fi
accepting
mental
weak
unvalued
7 = Deceiving
inverts 3
Fi
Se
producing
mental
weak
unvalued
Fe
accepting
weak
valued
Si
producing
vital
weak
valued
4 = Aspirational
Si
3 = Tertiary
3 = Relief
Fe
vital
(unconscious)
5 = Opposing
inverts 1
Ni
Te
accepting
vital
strong
unvalued
6 = Critical
inverts 2
Te
Ni
producing
vital
strong
unvalued
inverts 4
Examples
Ne
4 = Inferior
ed-
6 = mobilizing, activating
lign
inverts 3
isa
5 = suggestive, dual-seeking
Note: Socionics populates functions 3 through 8 in a completely different order from Jung, MBTI and Berens.
MBTI 3 and 4 become Socionics 6 and 5, respectively.
1: Describes a person's most comfortable thinking patterns, perspective on life, state of mind, and behavioral style, their positive motivational forces.
2: The primary mode of application of the base function. Used to interact with others, solve problems.
3: When a person is actively using his base function, the role function is essentially turned off. It is activated when a person is anxious.
4: The vulnerable function is also called the Point or Place of Least Resistance (PoLR) or sensitive function. The element in this function creates a feeling of frustration and inadequacy and is avoided as much as possible.
5: The suggestive function is also called the dual-seeking function. It perfectly complements and drives the activity of the leading function. Entertaining, soothing, energizing.
6: The subject is more comfortable using this function than the suggestive function but still can only use it sporadically.
7: The ignoring function is also called the observing, or limiting function. A person has very little use of this element, as it is the rival image of the base function, representing an antithetical approach to the same domain.
It lies in the subconscious as a persistent annoyance to the individual.
8: A person uses this element mainly as a kind of game, or to ridicule those who he thinks take it too seriously. They often intentionally go against its conventional usage simply to prove a point in favor of their creative function.
However, this function is used quite often in private, to produce information of its element to support their creative function when focusing on making contact with the external world.
Socionics Model A
Function number pattern
Accepting Producing
Ring 1 = Mental
Ring 2 = Vital
1
4
6
7
2
3
5
8
Strong
Weak
Weak
Strong
1: Leading
2: Creative
3: Role
4: Vulnerable
1: Leading
2: Creative
5: Suggestive
6: Mobilizing
5: Suggestive
6: Mobilizing
7: Ignoring
8: Demonstrative
4: Vulnerable
3: Role
8: Demonstrative
7: Ignoring
Based on the Socionics schema, Duality refers to {1:5; 2:6} = {1:~3; 2:~4}
This is equivalent to {1:4; 2:3} in the Jungian, MBTI, Berens schema.
Block 1 describes people's preferred and most comfortable and natural role or "mode of operation" when interacting with other people or the environment.
Block 2 is the source of much self-consciousness.
In Block 3, people appreciate direct help to the Super-id and see tasks related to it as chores best left to others, but also as a source of frequent recreation.
In Block 4, people see Id elements as a relatively easy, if somewhat boring and meaningless exercise, good for sharpening one's skills, but not worth focusing on too much.
Page 1
Si
Se
Ti
Te
Socionics
Information
Metabolism
Element
Extraverted logic
(thinking)
Extraverted ethics
(feeling)
Abstracted definition(?)
(rather, concerned with these
Information Aspects)
external dynamics of objects
(explicit meaning of purposely observed
structures)
Extraverted sensing
Extraverted intuition
Introverted logic
(thinking)
Introverted ethics
(feeling)
Introverted sensing
Introverted intuition
English
Acronym Symbol Mental Processes
Te
Fe
responsible for the perception of an emotional state in an individual and the bodily and linguistic expression of emotions. Fe is able to influence others' emotional
condition and to communicate its own, "infecting" others. Fe is used especially in generating and recognizing excitement and enthusiasm.
Se
responsible for the perception, control, defense, and acquisition of space, territory, and control. It observes outward appearances, estimates whether forces are in
alignment or conflict, and uses strength of will and power-based methods to achieve purposes. Se understands territory and physical aggression. It is also the function
of contact and apprehension of qualia.
Ne
sees possibilities; seeks the essence (permanent but not obvious traits) of people or things; estimates potential and latent capabilities; speculates on causes,
but sees each manifestation as distinct
Ti
analytic; interested in logical explanations and distinctions, categories and meaning, consistency and structure, independent of application; interprets information
according to how it fits into a (concrete or abstract) validating system
Fi
responsible for understanding the quality, nature, and proper maintenance of personal relations; makes moral judgments; and aspires to humanism and kindness.
Fi has a strong understanding of the social hierarchy and how people feel about each other, their attitudes of like or dislike, enthrallment or disgust, repulsion or
attraction, enmity or friendship.
Si
responsible for perception of physical sensations; questions of comfort, coziness, and pleasure; and a sense of harmony and acclimation with one's environment
(especially physical). Si understand how well a person or thing's behavior agrees with its nature as well as the differences between comfortable behaviors
and positions and uncomfortable ones.
Ni
seeks to understand and forecast evolution of processes over time; is acutely aware of events that occurring outside of immediate perception.
These are the Information Aspects (i.e, inputs) that align with each Information Metabolism Element of the psyche. They are not the same thing.
inFJ
Objects vs. Fields is an elaboration of E/I. Objects are discrete, categorical, structural. Fields are continuous and involve interaction (e.g., attitude,
orientation) between the observed and the observer or among objects (e,g,, mechanics).
Static perception = Pe(Ji) vs. Dynamic perception = Pi(Je). Dynamic perception {Si, Ni} involves memory, association, expectation (incl. potentialities beyond
past observation.) Static perception {Se, Ne} is opportunistic, descriptive, dissociative, self-limiting rather than inductive.
So, as processed by a leading function:
Dynamics of objects = E__J (= E__j) = purposefully observed (Pi) structures (E).
Statics of objects
= E__P (= E__p) =
naturally observed (Pe) structures (E).
Dynamics of fields = I__J (= I__p) = purposefully observed (Pi) processes (I).
Statics of fields
= I__P (= I__j) =
naturally observed (Pe) processes (I).
External = {T, S} vs. Internal = {F, N} describes explicit vs. implicit understanding. So, in a leading function:
External dynamics of objects gets us to E_TJ (L_E = Logical Extrovert), whose Information Metabolism most easily processes explicit meaning of purposely
observed structures.
See:
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/Ti
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/types/LII-INTj/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/model_a/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics-forum/116936-reinin-dichotomies-traits-test-determine-type.html
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/16Types/16Types.cfm
Page 2