History

Layout has been changed since tender stage.

Reasons
Latest drawings prepared in Feb-08
Extract from Design Report
4.6 Desilting Basin and Power Channel
To date, there have been no investigations performed in the vicinity of the proposed power channel and desiling basin.
As such, the selection of material properties and characteristics is based purely on the appreciation gained during the site visit, and engineering judgement.
Based on the nature of the site, it is expected that the majority of overburden will be gravely sands/ sandy gravels with
cobbles, possible up to the size of small boulders. The material is expected to have very little fines,
albeit some of the cultivated areas may have higher quality material.
The desilting basin is located predominantly on a cultivated terrace.
It is expected that this site will have a relatively high thickness of overburden due to the construction of the terrace.
It is also possible that the alignment of the river originally crossed the vicinity of the terrace and as such,
it is possible that bedrock is well below surface level. It is very difficult to assess the depth to foundation rock in
this region, however, for the tendering process, it is reasonable to assume that around half of the basin will be
excavated through moderately weathered to fresh rock.
The power channel will comprise a combination of cut and fill embankments. It is expected that the depth of
overburden along the channel will be much less than in the vicinity of the desilting basin.
12.1 General
A 3.05km long Power channel takes off immediately downstream of the desilting basin and terminates into forebay at the end of its run. The channel is of trapezoidal
section having a bed width of 14m and the side slopes of 1:2. Channel is designed for a flow of 616cumecs which includes the water requirement for overloading
condition. The bed slope of the power channel has been adopted as 1:11500 and a water depth of 10.21m

The entire length of the power channel is lined 150mm thick of M-20 grade. Pressure relief valve of 150mm dia has been provided at every 7.5m centre to centre at th
base width and at 6m centre to centre at the inclined face. In addition to the above a 150mm open ended perforated longitudinal drain and transverse drain have bee
provided. A 500mm dia PVC pipe has been provided at every 500m c/c from the base of the power channel to the end of embankment slope to flush the water from th
longitudinal and transverse drains.
A WBM Service road has been envisaged on both sides at top of the embankments
Details of the Power channel design are incorporated within drawing set D2000, D2001, D2002, D2003, D2010, D2011, D2021, D2022, D2023, and D2024.
12.2 Design Criteria
As stated in the Bid documents, the prescribed performance criteria for the Power channel are as follows:

Loss of water shall not be more than 0.6 m/sec per million m of wetted perimeter of lining as specified in CBIP Manual no. 171.

Settlement of Sediment the reduction in area due to siltation shall be lesser of 2% of cross-section area of channel within one year of its operation or as
specified in the BIS code or CBIP Manual 171.

The channel shall be capable of carrying of the design discharge plus 10% overloading with sufficient (minimum) free board. The discharge shall be measu
and recorded by Contractors at least two locations using current meters.

The design criteria for the power channel are as follows:

Channel lining shall be designed as per IS:3873

The channel shall be efficient in cross section and shall meet the guidelines given in IS: 10430, IS 4558, IS 9451

All earthworks shall be carried out as per IS:4701

Cross drainage shall be provided at each crossing with natural stream

Two lane concrete bridges shall be provided at the crossing.

Road on the top of the embankment shall be provided with WBM

12.3 Design Methodology
Site Investigations
The proposed additional investigations include:

Diamond cored holes to assess rock conditions along the desilting basin area

Modelling and Analysis

Hydraulic
A hydraulic model will be constructed to investigate the flow behaviour of the power channel.
Structural
The sides of the channel shall be at stable slope so that there is no earth pressure or any other pressure against the lining. The channel lining shall be able to withstan
the effect of velocity of water, rain, sunshine and chemical action of salts

In addition to the thickness of lining, a stability analysis for the earthern embankments shall be done. A thorough analysis for the built-up and excavated slopes shall
done so that it does not slide and shall be adequately and comprehensively protected by shortcrete, anchoring, pitching etc.
Detailing
Specifications, engineering drawings and where appropriate, shop drawings will be produced as part of the final design for all elements of this work, including
excavation, filling, embankments longitudinal and transverse drains, pressure relieve valve details etc.
12.4 Design Documentation
The following is a general list of design drawings that will be produced for the Power Channel:

General Arrangement,

Cross Sections of Power channel in Cutting and Filling

Embankment details

Drainage details

Details of Pressure relieve valves

Lining details

Typical details

Longitudinal Sections

Rock stabilisation
12.5 Construction Methodology
The Joint Venture has prepared a detailed construction methodology for the Power Channel and this is included as an Appendix to this report.
Description

Power Channel

i.

Excavation for and constructing fill embankments for a 3.25 km long power concrete lined channel of rectangular and trapezoidal cross-section with associa
structures.

ii.
iii.
iv.

Excavation for and construction in concrete of drainage structures crossing the power channel for the Mangsu Gad, Manjkot Gad, Chant Gad and other cros
structures.
Construction of four pre-stressed concrete bridges across the power channel.
Construction of two reinforced concrete pedestrian bridges across the power channel.

References
IS: 7916:1992
IS: 3873

Deviation from Tender Stage

96749
48014

Data Available

48735

neering judgement.

The channel is of trapezoidal

uirement for overloading

ery 7.5m centre to centre at the

and transverse drain have been
ope to flush the water from the

D2023, and D2024.

71.

ne year of its operation or as

The discharge shall be measured

lining shall be able to withstand

p and excavated slopes shall be

of this work, including

oidal cross-section with associated transition

Gad, Chant Gad and other cross drainage

Design Of Retaining Wall

* All dimensions are in m unless specified
1.00

h = 10.06
Water Side

Earth Side

3.50
2.00

1.50
6.00

L = 11.5
Condition 1 : No water inside power channel, Earth fill outside

Properties
Unit wt. of soil(e)
Angle of internal friction of soil()

=
=

21 KN/m3
36 degree

Unit wt. of concrete

25 KN/m3

Safe Bearing Capacity of soil(SBC)

550 KN/m2

Unit wt. of water,w

Coefficient of friction,m
Loads
Selfweight
Load
Value(KN)
W1
739.04
W2
125.69
W3
251.38
W5
431.25
Earth pressure(Static & Dynamic)
(Ref. Clause 8.1 of IS:1893-1984)

=
=

10 KN/m3
0.73

h
v

=
=
=
=
=

Horizontal Seimic Coefficient.

Vertical seismic coefficient equal to h/2
Angle of internal friction of soil
tan-1[(h)/(1v)]
Angle which earth face of the wall makes with the vertical

7 of 32

=
=

F
b

=
=

Slope of earth fill

Angle of friction between the wall and earthfill
(wall friction angle,should be taken 2/3 of of IRC-78pp79)
factor which is a function of geometry
Thickness of wall

(1 v) * cos2 ( - - )

=
Ca

cos * cos2 * cos( + + )

1 +

1
sin ( + ) sin ( - -
cos ( - ) cos ( + + )

1 +

1
sin ( + ) sin ( - -
cos ( - ) cos ( + )

Putting h = 0, v = 0 and =0
=
Ca'

(1 ) * cos2 ( -)
1 * cos2 * cos( + )

Natural period of vibration ,T = F x h2/b

F
=
0.0021
T
=
0.163447235
Sa/g
=
3
h
=
0.155

=
36 degrees
v = 2h/3 =
0.1033333333
= h
7.9967720311 or
=tan 1=

5.679561453 degrees
1v

=
24 degrees

=
0 degrees

(Ref. Note below clause 5.3.2 of IS 12720:1993)

(Ref. Note below clause 5.3.2 of IS 12720:1993)
( Ref. fig. 5 of earthquake report for 0.2 sec natural period)
( Ref. clause 5.4.3 of earthquake report)

9.8073694038 degrees

Calculation of Active Coefficients

TOTAL

(1 + v) * cos2 ( - - )

0.968

(1 - v) * cos2 ( - - )

0.787

cos * cos2 * cos( + + )

0.753

sin ( + ) sin ( - - )

0.382

cos ( - ) cos ( + + )

0.768

0.441856

0.277303

0.16

(1 v) * cos2 ( - - )

Total Ca
Castatic
Coefficient for dynamic earth pressure increment,Cadynamic = Ca - Ca'
Maximum static earth pressure =

(1/2)*e*h*Castatic

29.27695 KN/m2

Dynamic earth pressure

(1/2)*e*h*Cadynamic

16.8924 KN/m2

Load due to static earth pressure(Sepr) =

29.28*10.06

Load due to dynamic earth pressure(Depr) =

16.89*10.06

acting at a distance 1/3 of height from bottom

=
169.8531 KN

294.3797 KN

acting at a distance 1/2 of height from bottom

8 of 32

Vehicle surcharge
Equivalent to soil surcharge of height,he

0.6 m

Pressure due to vehicle surcharge,Pvs =

castatic*e*he

3.494017 KN/m2

Load due to vehicle surcharge(Wv) =

Pvs * h

35.13234 KN

acting at a distance 1/2 of height from bottom

Lateral Inertia seimic load
Load
SLW2
SLW3
SLW5

Cooresponding weight(KN)
125.69
251.38
431.25

Seimic Load value (KN)

19.48
38.96
66.84

Cooresponding weight(KN)
125.69
251.38
431.25

Seimic Load value (KN)

12.99
25.98
44.56

Vertical Inertia seimic load

Load
SVW2
SVW3
SVW5
Stability against Overturning
a) Without earthquake case
Resultant of vertical forces

Load
W1
W2
W3
W5
Total Wt.

Moment about
Value(KN)
CG from B(m) B(KNm)
739.04
9.75
7205.66
125.69
7.33
921.71
251.38
6.50
1633.94
431.25
5.75
2479.69
1547.36
12241.00

CG of resultant from B

7.91 m

Overturning Moment due to static earth pressure + Vehicle surcharge,Mo

Resisting Moment,Mr
FOS = 0.9*Mr/Mo

=
=
=

1657.56 KNm
12241.00 KNm
6.65
>1.4,OK

=
=
=

3165.26 KNm
12761.32 KNm
3.63
>1.4,OK

b) With earthquake case

Load
SLW2
SLW3
SLW5
SVW2
SVW3
SVW5
Depr
Total Wt.

Value(KN)
19.48
38.96
66.84
12.99
25.98
44.56
169.85
253.38

CG from B(m)
4.85
6.53
0.75
7.33
6.50
5.75
6.53

Moment about
B(KNm)
94.52
254.33
50.13
95.24
168.84
256.23
1108.72
1629.03

Overturning moment due to Lateral seimic loads,earth pressure and vehicle

surcharge,Mo
Resisting moment,Mr
FOS = 0.9Mr/Mo
Stability against Sliding

9 of 32

a) Without earthquake case

Sliding Force
Resisiting Force = mR
FOS

=
=
=

294.3797 KN
1124.219 KN
3.818942
>1.4,OK

Sliding Force
Resisiting Force = mR
FOS

=
=
=

589.52 KN
1184.904 KN
2.009943
>1.4,OK

a) Without earthquake case

Distance of resultant from B, Lr =(Mv - Mh)/R
(12241.00- (294.38 X (10.06/3 + 1.50) + 35.13 X (10.06 /2 + 1.50) ) ) / 1547.36

6.839697 m

e = Lr - L/2

1.089697 m

Pressure at A

211.0508 KN/m2

Pressure at B

58.05441 KN/m2

b) With earthquake case

Base Pressure Calculation

Mv = moment due to vertical forces
Mh = moment due to horizontal forces
R = Vertical Reaction
e = Eccentrcity of resultant force from centre of foorting
Pressure, P = ((R/L) x (1 +- 6e/L))

STEM
Sepr =

294.38
h/3

HEEL

TOE

C
A

B
137.88

211.05

164.49

58.05

b) With earthquake case

Distance of resultant from B, Lr =(Mv - Mh)/R

6.024588 m

e = Lr - L/2

0.274588 m

Pressure at A

162.1327 KN/m2

Pressure at B

121.4987 KN/m2

Depr + Wv

Sepr =

STEM

204.99
294.38

h/2
h/3

HEEL

TOE

10 of 32

B
142.70

162.13

149.77

121.50

Design
a) Bending Moment and Shear stress Calculations
* -ve load indicates downward load
* Deductions are due to selfweight and soil weight
* Lever arm distance is the distance of CG of load to the point about which moment is considered
* Shear stress calculated at a distance d from face of concrete

Component
Heel Slab
Toe slab
Stem

Load due to earth

bottom
pressure(KN)
545.82
792.59

Load
Point about
Deduction(KN
which mom. Is Lever arm
Net Load(KN)
)
taken
distance(m)
870.2925
-324.47
About C
1.77
225
567.59
About D
2.92

Depr + Wv
Sepr

204.99
294.38

About C
About C
Total for stem

5.03
3.35

b) Permissible stresses
Material

Permissible
stresses
N/mm2

Grade

Remarks
In compression (bending Ref.

Concrete

M25

8.5 Table21 IS456)

Concrete

M25

6 Table21 IS456)

In compression(direct Ref.

Away from Liquid retaining

Steel

Fe415

190 face(Table2 IS3370(part2))

Steel

Fe415

150 face(Table2 IS3370(part2))

near to Liquid retaining

c) Material Properties

cb
st

=
=
=
=
=

Modular ratio = 280/3cb

N = 1 / (1+ st/mcb)
j = 1- N/3
d) Heel slab Design
Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d
Ast req =
Provide

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress

25 mm dia @

8.5 N/mm2
150 N/mm2
10.98
0.38
0.87

=
=
=
=
=
=

637.27
1500.00
25
75
1412.5

575.33 kN-m

3113.48 mm2 per mr

=
=
=
=

3166.928 mm2 per mr

0.224207
0.137008 N/mm2
0.2 N/mm2

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

155 mm c/c Top steel

11 of 32

OK
e) Toe slab Design
Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d
Ast req =
Provide

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)
40 mm dia @

Ast req =
Provide

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress

40 mm dia @

1081.58
1500.00
40
75
1405

1657.23 kN-m

9016.27 mm2 per mr

=
=
=
=

9308.423 mm2 per mr

0.662521
0.309382 N/mm2
0.32 N/mm2
OK

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

135 mm c/c

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress
f) Stem Design
Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d

=
=
=
=
=
=

=
=
=
=
=
=

2017.23 kN-m

1193.28
2000.00
40
75
1905

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

8094.3 mm2 per mr

=
=
=
=

8107.336 mm2 per mr

0.425582
0.212471 N/mm2
0.27 N/mm2
OK

155 mm c/c

12 of 32

13 of 32

sin ( + ) sin ( - - 1/2

cos ( - ) cos ( + + )

sin ( + ) sin ( - - 1/2

cos ( - ) cos ( + )

0.2 sec natural period)

STATIC
0.745141
0.745141

0.8602991
0.509037

0.8645432

nce 1/3 of height from bottom

nce 1/2 of height from bottom

14 of 32

nce 1/2 of height from bottom

oad value (KN)

19.48
38.96
66.84

oad value (KN)

12.99
25.98
44.56

15 of 32

Towards A from centre of footing

<SBC,OK
<SBC,OK

Towards A from centre of footing

<SBC,OK
<SBC,OK

16 of 32

Shear
Moment( Stress(N/
KNm)
mm2)
575.33
0.137008
1657.23
0.309382

Lever arm
distance(m)
1.77
2.92
5.03
3.35
=

1030.56
986.66
2017.23

0.212471

mm2 per mr
mm2 per mr

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

17 of 32

mm2 per mr
mm2 per mr

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

mm2 per mr
mm2 per mr

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

18 of 32

Design Of Retaining Wall

* All dimensions are in m unless specified
1.00

h = 10.06
Water Side

Earth Side

3.50
2.00

1.50
6.00

L = 11.5
Condition 2 : Water inside power channel, No Earth outside

Properties
Unit wt. of soil(e)
Angle of internal friction of soil()

=
=

Unit wt. of concrete

25 KN/m3

Safe Bearing Capacity of soil(SBC)

Unit wt. of water,w

550 KN/m2

=
=

10 KN/m3
0.73

Coefficient of friction,m
Loads
Selfweight
Load
Value(KN)
W2
125.69
W3
251.38
W4
603.30
W5
431.25
Water pressure(Static & Dynamic)
(Ref. Clause 7.2 of IS:1893-1984 for Hydrodynamic pressure)
h
=
Horizontal Seimic Coefficient.
v
Vertical seismic coefficient equal to h/2
=
Natural period of vibration ,T = F x h 2/b
F
=
0.0021
T
=
0.163447235
Sa/g
=
3
h
=
0.155

21 KN/m3
36 degree

(Ref. Note below clause 5.3.2 of IS 12720:1993)

(Ref. Note below clause 5.3.2 of IS 12720:1993)
( Ref. fig. 5 of earthquake report for 0.2 sec natural period)
( Ref. clause 5.4.3 of earthquake report)

19 of 32

The Hydrodynamic Pressure

p=C S h wh
The Coefficient varies with shape and depth

( (

Cm y
y
C S=
2
+
2 h
h
w=
h=
Cm =

10 KN/m3
10.055 m

y
y
2
h
h

))

0.75 for vertical face of wall

h =

0.155

v =

0.1033333333

Element
Height
10.055

Cm Coefficient Calculated from Fig:10

of IS:1893-1984
y Depth of water from surface

Depth from
surface, y
10.06

Cs

p(KN/m2)

0.750

11.69
w*h

Maximum static Water pressure =

Hydrodynamic pressure at base
Load due to static water pressure(Swpr) =

0.5 x100.55 x 10.06

Load due to Hydrodynamic pressure(Dwpr) =

2/3 x 11.69 x 10.06

100.55 KN/m2

11.69 KN/m2

505.5151 KN

acting at a distance 1/3 of height from bottom

=

78.35484 KN

acting at a distance 0.4h of height from bottom

Lateral Inertia seimic load
Load
SLW2
SLW3
SLW5

Cooresponding weight(KN)
125.69
251.38
431.25

Seimic Load value (KN)

19.48
38.96
66.84

Cooresponding weight(KN)
125.69
251.38
431.25

Seimic Load value (KN)

12.99
25.98
44.56

Vertical Inertia seimic load

Load
SVW2
SVW3
SVW5
Stability against Overturning
a) Without earthquake case
Resultant of vertical forces

Load
W2
W3
W4
W5
Total Wt.

Value(KN)
125.69
251.38
603.30
431.25
1411.61

Moment about
CG from A(m) A(KNm)
4.17
523.70
5.00
1256.88
8.50
5128.05
5.75
2479.69
9388.31

CG of resultant from A

Overturning Moment due to static water pressure

Resisting Moment
FOS

=
=
=

6.65 m
2452.59 KNm
9388.31 KNm
3.83
>1.4,OK

20 of 32

b) With earthquake case

Load
SLW2
SLW3
SLW5
SVW2
SVW3
SVW5
Dwpr

Value(KN)
19.48
38.96
66.84
12.99
25.98
44.56
78.35

CG from A(m)
4.85
6.53
0.75
4.17
5.00
5.75
5.52

Moment about
A(KNm)
94.52
254.33
50.13
54.12
129.88
256.23
432.68

Overturning moment due to Lateral seimic loads and water pressure

Resisting moment
FOS

=
=
=

3284.25 KNm
9828.54 KNm
2.99
>1.4,OK

Sliding Force
Resisiting Force = mR
FOS

=
=
=

505.5151 KN
1025.597 KN
2.028815
>1.4,OK

Sliding Force
Resisiting Force = mR
FOS

=
=
=

709.16 KN
1086.281 KN
1.53179
>1.4,OK

Lr

4.913331 m

e = Lr - L/2

-0.84 m

Pressure at B

69.1662 KN/m2

<SBC,OK

Pressure at A

176.3316 KN/m2

<SBC,OK

Stability against Sliding

a) Without earthquake case

b) With earthquake case

Base Pressure Calculation

Mv = moment due to vertical forces
Mh = moment due to horizontal forces
R = Vertical Reaction
e = Eccentrcity of resultant force from centre of foorting
Pressure, P = ((R/L) x (1 +- 6e/L))
a) Without earthquake case
Distance of resultant from A, Lr =(Mv - Mh)/R

Towards A from centre of fo

STEM
Swpr =
D

HEEL

505.52

TOE h/3

C
A

B
125.08

176.33

143.72

69.17

21 of 32

b) With earthquake case

Distance of resultant from A, Lr =(Mv - Mh)/R
Lr

4.377046 m

e = Lr - L/2

-1.372954 m

Pressure at B

36.88131 KN/m2

<SBC,OK

Pressure at A

223.1427 KN/m2

<SBC,OK

Towards A from centre of fo

STEM
Dwpr=

78.35
505.52

Swpr =
0.4h h/3
HEEL

C
A

223.14

D
134.06

166.45

TOE

36.88

Design
a) Bending Moment and Shear stress Calculations
* -ve load indicates downward load
* Deductions are due to selfweight and weight of water
* Lever arm distance is the distance of CG of load to the point about which moment is considered
* Shear stress calculated at a distance d from face of concrete

Component
Heel Slab
Toe slab
Stem

Load due to earth Load

Point about
bottom
Deduction(KN
which mom. Is
pressure(KN)
)
Net Load(KN)
taken
681.80
131.25
550.55
About C
512.83
828.3
-315.47
About D
Dwpr
Swpr

78.35
505.52

Lever arm
distance(m)
1.83
2.43

About C
About C
Total for stem

4.02
3.35
=

b) Permissible stresses
Material

Permissible
stresses

Grade

Remarks

N/mm2
In compression (bending Ref.

Concrete

M25

8.5 Table21 IS456)

Concrete

M25

6 Table21 IS456)

In compression(direct Ref.

Away from Liquid retaining

Steel

Fe415

190 face(Table2 IS3370(part2))

Steel

Fe415

150 face(Table2 IS3370(part2))

near to Liquid retaining

c) Material Properties

cb
st
Modular ratio = 280/3cb
N = 1 / (1+ st/mcb)
j = 1- N/3

=
=
=
=
=

8.5 N/mm2
150 N/mm2
10.98
0.38
0.87

22 of 32

d) Heel slab Design

Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d
Ast req =
Provide

=
=
=
=
=
=

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)

=
32 mm dia @

Ast req =
Provide

=
=
=
=

=
=
=
=
=
=

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)

=
25 mm dia @

Ast req =
Provide

=
=
=
=

=
=
=
=
=
=

sqrt(6.M/cb.b) =

M/(st.j.d)

=
40 mm dia @

5480.353 mm2 per mr

5546.536 mm2 per mr
0.393651
0.233436 N/mm2
0.26 N/mm2
(Table 23, IS:456-2000)
OK
767.07 kN-m

735.84
1500.00
25
75
1412.5

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

4151.145 mm2 per mr

115 mm c/c

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress
f) Stem Design
Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

145 mm c/c bottom steel

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress
e) Toe slab Design
Max. Bending Moment
Overall Depth required,D
Depth Provided
Dia. Of rebar
Clear Cover
Effective depth,d

1010.18 kN-m

844.43
1500.00
32
75
1409

4268.468 mm2 per mr

0.302192
0.170765 N/mm2
0.25 N/mm2
(Table 23, IS:456-2000)
OK
2009.46 kN-m

1190.98
2000.00
40
75
1905

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

8063.139 mm2 per mr

155 mm c/c

Ast prov =
100Ast/bd =
Shear stress at a distance d
Permissible shear stress

=
=
=
=

8107.336 mm2 per mr

0.425582
0.248426 N/mm2
0.27 N/mm2
(Table 23, IS:456-2000)
OK

Check For Crack width in STEM

( Ref. Pillai andn Menon: Page-369)

Permissible Bening Compressive Stress in Concrete

8.5

N/sq.mm.

for M25 grade

(Ref: IS 456:2000, table 21, page 81)

Since we are considering stresses due to Earthquake , the stresses specified above has been exceeded upto a limit of 33.333 percent.
(Ref: IS 456:2000, Section B-2.3, page 80)
=>

10.9803922

1000 mm

1905.000 mm

Ast

8107.336 sq.mm

Asc

8107.336 sq.mm

d'

91.000 mm.

Clear Cover

75.000 mm

Spacing

155.000 mm

2000.00 mm

0.426

23 of 32

p'

0.426

24 of 32

Taking moments of areas of the cracked-transformed section about NA

k=[m2 (p+1.5p)2+2m(p+1.5p'd'/d)0.5-m(p+1.5p')]

0.42107313

=>

kd

802.144305

Es

200000.00

fst

m * M(d-kd) / Icr

Icr

fst

N/mm^2

Tensile Stress in Steel Under Service Load

Moment due to service Load

=>

2009.46 KN.m
3.212E+011 mm4
75.75 Mpa.
Which is less than st = 230 Mpa

Crck width Calculation

m

(1/Es) * [(D-kd)/(d-kd)]*[ fst - {bt (D-kd)/(3*Ast)}]

=>

0.0001439

Cmin.

75.00 mm

acr

107.85 mm

wcr

(3*acr*m) / [1+{2*(acr-cmin) / (D-kd)}]

0.04414 mm.

As per IS 456:2000 Clause No. 35.3.2 Permissible Limit for cracking is 0.2 mm.

25 of 32

26 of 32

ght from bottom

ight from bottom

27 of 32

Towards A from centre of footing

28 of 32

Towards A from centre of footing

Shear
Moment( Stress(N/
KNm)
mm2)
1010.18
0.233436
767.07
0.170765
315.14
1694.32
2009.46

0.248426

29 of 32

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

(Table 23, IS:456-2000)

30 of 32

31 of 32

- {bt (D-kd)/(3*Ast)}]

32 of 32