Learning Outcome 4.

The junior communication professional contributes an

equal part to the management (of) the process (10%)
4a. cooperates respectfully and effectively in a team and with external
stakeholders/contacts.
4b. deals professionally with the quality control of their cooperation and products.

Instruction for filling in the form

All students in the group have to assess their peer students and themselves by
comparing each other on the different team cooperation aspects. The scores are relative.
By comparing the team members with each other on these five areas you score each
member on a scale from 0 10
Next to giving points to each other and yourself you also motivate per student what you
based your score on. Next to giving feedback on their team collaboration you also give a
suggestion for the next period on what they can improve.
The coach decides on how many points each member will get for the team collaboration.
Maximum number of points is 10

1)Planning: student contribution to the SCRUM process

the student can plan tasks, deadlines and priorities in an effective manner (CULTURAL
SENSITIVE)
the student meets the agreed deadlines
compared results to agreed plans regarding the agreed products and quality (DOD )
2)Feedback - SCRUM Retro & Reviews
the student gives feedback in a constructive way (CULTURAL SENSITIVE)
received feedback in a non-defensive way, by asking and clarifying what was meant
the received feedback (coach and colleagues) was acknowledged and implemented
when necessary
3) Collaboration/communication ( CULTURAL SENSITIVE)
the student adjusted his/her behavior according to the Collaboration Agreement/ the
cultural context
the student was collaborative, helping team members
communication with the other group members and external stakeholders was timely
and according to the Collaboration Agreement
4) Shared Learning Capacity
proactively asked for clarifications if the theory content was not clear for him/her
explained his/her work (content) when the other members needed clarifications
helped the other members to attune to his/her own work and the group work
(CULTURAL SENSITIVE)
5) Commitment/Quality Control
the group member was committed to the products' quality agreements made by the
group
the group member was committed to the group process (contributed with creative

ideas, volunteered, took extra work)

the group member had a positive working attitude and good level of motivation
Max score: 10 pts

Total (total divided by 5)

Name student that fills in this form:

Assessment criteria

Nam
e

nam
e

nam
e

1) Planning, contribution to SCRUM process

2) Feedback Retro/Review and intercultural
sensitivity
3) Collaboration/Communication + cultural
sensitivity
4) Shared learning Capacity
5) Quality Control
Total

Motivation per team member and feedback/advice for next phase:

1)For Student
Motivation:
Feedback/Advice:
2) For Student
Motivation:

Feedback/Advice:
3) For Student
Motivation:

Feedback/Advice:
4) For Student
Motivation:

nam
e

nam
e

Feedback/Advice:
5) Myself:
Motivation
Feedback/Advice