Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
EXCEPTIONS:
1. When the law itself authorized its validity (ex. lotto, sweepstakes)
2. When the law makes the act only voidable and not void (ex. voidable contracts
where consent is vitiated)
3. When the law makes the act valid but punishes the violator (ex. marriage
solemnized by a person without legal authority)
Waiver of rights
Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
2. Knowledge of the existence of a right
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
LEX
NATIONALII
Art.
CC
15,
basis
for
determining
personal law of an
individual
is
his
citizenship
LEX REI
SITAE
Art. 16, CC
LEX LOCI
CELEBRATIONIS
Art. 17, CC
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
Citizenshi
p is the
basis for
determini
ng the
personal
law
applicable
Covers
family
rights &
duties,
status,
condition
& legal
capacity
Exception
:
Art. 26,
par. 2 of
Family
Code
Law of the
place
where the
property is
situated is
the basis
for
determinin
g law
applicable
Covers both
real &
personal
property
Law of the
place where
the contract
was executed
is the basis for
determining
law applicable
Exceptions:
(CIAO)
1. Capacity
to succeed
2. Intrinsic
validity of
the will
3. Amount
of
successiona
l rights
4. Order of
succession
Exceptions:
1. Art. 26, par.
1 of Family
Code
(marriage
involving
Filipinos
solemnized
abroad, when
such are void
in the
Philippines)
2. Intrinsic
validity of
contracts
IN
CIVIL LAW
Covers only
the forms &
solemnities
(extrinsic
validity)
Renvoi Doctrine
Where the conflict rules of the forum refer to a foreign law, and the latter refers
it back to the internal law, the latter (law of the forum) shall apply.
NOTE: If the foreign law refers it to a third country, the said countrys laws shall govern,
and is referred to as the transmission theory.
Doctrine of Processual Presumption
The foreign law, whenever applicable, should be proved by the proponent
thereof; otherwise, such law shall be presumed to be exactly the same as the law
of the forum.
Rule on Prohibitive Laws
GENERAL RULE: Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or property and laws
which have for their object public order, public policy or good customs are not rendered
ineffective by laws, judgments promulgated or conventions agreed upon in foreign
country.
EXCEPTION: Art. 26, par. 2 Family Code
Example: Divorce law
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
Human Relations
Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his
duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good
faith. (Art. 19 of NCC)
NOTE: The elements of an abuse of right under Art. 19 are:
1. There is a legal right;
2. Which is exercised in bad faith;
3. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another. (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Velayo vs. Shell held the defendant liable under Art. 19 for disposing of its
property (a perfectly legal act) in order to escape the reach of a creditor. Likewise, in
Globe
Mackay
Cable
and
Radio
Corp.
vs. CA, the employer corporation was held liable for damages for an abusive manner in
dismissing an employee, as well as for the inhuman treatment the latter got from them.
NOTE: Art. 21 deals with acts contra bonus mores, and has the following elements:
1. There is an act which is legal;
2. But which is contrary to morals, customs, public order;
3. and it is done with intent to injure.
Arts. 19, 20 and 21 are related to each other and, under these articles, an act
which
causes injury to another may be made the basis for an award of damages.
There is a common element under Arts. 19 and 21, and that is, the act must be done
intentional. However, Art. 20 does not distinguish, the act may be done either willfully
or negligently. (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Pe vs. Pe, applying Art. 21 ruled that a married man had seduced a girl
through an ingenious and tricky scheme, i.e. on the pretext of teaching her how to pray
the rosary, to the extent of making her fall in love with him. Verily, he has committed an
injury to the girls family in a manner contrary to morals, good customs and public policy.
However, in Tanjanco vs. CA, the SC denied the award of moral damages based on
the fact that for one year, from 1958-1959, the plaintiff, a woman of adult age,
maintained intimate sexual relations with defendant, with repeated acts of intercourse.
Such conduct is incompatible with the idea of seduction. Plainly, there is here
voluntariness and mutual passion; for had the plaintiff been deceived, had she
surrendered exclusively because of the deceit, artful persuasions and wiles of defendant,
she would not have again yielded to his embraces, much less for one year without
exacting early fulfillment of the alleged promises of marriage and would have cut short all
sexual relations upon finding that defendant did not intend to fulfill his promises. Hence,
no case is made under Art. 21 of Civil Code.
While a breach of promise to marry is not actionable, it has been held that to
formally set a wedding and go through and spend for all the wedding preparation and
publicity, only to walk out of it when the matrimony was about to be solemnized is a
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
different matter. This palpably and unjustifiably contrary to good customs for which the
defendant must be held answerable for damages in accordance with Art. 21 of the Civil
Code. (Wassmer vs. Velez)
PERSONS
CIVIL PERSONALITY
aptitude of being the subject, active or passive, of rights and obligations
JURIDICAL
CAPACITY
Fitness to be the
subject of legal
relations
Passive
Inherent
Lost only through
death
Can exist without
capacity to act
Cannot be
limited or
restricted
CAPACITY TO ACT
Power to do act with
legal effects
Active
Merely acquired
Lost through death
and other causes
Cannot exist without
juridical capacity
Can be restricted,
modified or limited
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
Applies to
natural persons
One has the
ability to do all
things with legal
effects except
only in those
specific circumstances where
the capacity to
act is restrained
Applies to juridical
persons
This limits the power
of juridical persons
only to those that are
expressly conferred
upon them or those
which can be implied
therefrom or
incidental thereto
Natural persons
GENERAL RULE: Birth determines personality.
EXCEPTION: The law considers the conceived child as born for all purposes favorable to
it if born alive. Therefore, the child has a presumed personality, which has two
characteristics:
1. limited; and
2. provisional/conditional (Quimiguing vs. Icao)
NOTES:
The presumption as to the childs personality applies only in cases beneficial to the
child.
The concept of provisional personality CANNOT be invoked to obtain damages for and
in behalf of an aborted child. (Geluz vs. CA)
When is a Child Considered Born
GENERAL RULE: For civil purposes, the fetus is considered born if it is alive at the time
it is completely delivered from the mothers womb.
EXCEPTION: If the fetus had an intrauterine life of less than 7 months, it is not
deemed born if it dies within 24 hours after its complete delivery from the maternal
womb.
Presumption of survivorship
Two or more persons, called to succeed each other, shall be presumed to have
died at the same time, subject to the following conditions:
1. parties are heirs to one another
2. no proof as to who died first
3. with doubt as to who died first
NOTE: Article 43 applies when the parties are called to succeed each other. But if the
parties are not called to succeed each other, Rule 131, Sec. 3 (jj) of the Rules of Court
applies. Both are to be applied only in the absence of facts.
Juridical persons
WHO:
a. State and its political subdivisions
b. Corporations, institutions and entities for public purpose or interest
c. Corporations, partnership and associations for private interest
HOW CREATED: For (a) and (b), by the laws creating or recognizing them; private
corporations are governed by BP 68 and partnership and associations are governed by the
provisions of this Code concerning partnerships.
NOTE: The Roman Catholic Church is a corporation by prescription, with acknowledged
juridical personality, inasmuch as it is an institution which antedated, by almost a
thousand years, any other personality in Europe, and which existed when Grecian
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
eloquence still flourished in Antioch and when idols where still worshipped in the temple
of Mecca. (Barlin vs. Ramirez)
The estate of a deceased person should be considered an artificial or juridical
person for the purposes of the settlement and distribution of his estate which, of course,
include the exercise during the judicial administration thereof of those rights and the
fulfillment of those obligations of his which survived after his death. (Limjoco vs.
Intestate Estate of Pedro Fragrante)
Cessation of Civil Personality
1. If natural persons: by death
2. If juridical persons: by termination of existence
CITIZENSHIP AND DOMICILE
RESIDENCE
DOMICILE
Used to indicate a
PLACE OF ABODE,
whether
permanent or
temporary
There can be
several places of
residence
denotes a FIXED
PERMANENT
RESIDENCE, which
when absent, one
has the intention of
returning
There can only be
ONE place of
domicile
Elements of Domicile
a. Physical presence in a fixed place
b. Intention to remain permanently (animus manendi)
Kinds of Domicile
1. Domicile of origin - received by a person at birth.
2. Domicile of choice - the place freely chosen by a person sui juris.
3. Constructive domicile - assigned to a child by law at the time of his birth.
II. FAMILY CODE
took effect August 3, 1988
MARRIAGE
A special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in
accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life. Its nature,
consequences and incidents are fixed by law and cannot be the subject of stipulation.
Essential requisites: (LC)
1. Legal capacity of the contracting parties, who must be a male and a female
2. Consent freely given in the presence of a solemnizing officer
Formal requisites: (ALM)
1. Authority of the solemnizing officer
2. Valid Marriage License
3. Marriage ceremony where the contracting parties appear before the solemnizing
officer, with their personal declaration that the take each other as husband and wife
in the presence of not less than two witnesses of legal age
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
Effects:
1. Absence of essential or formal requisites
the marriage is void ab initio
2. Defect in any of the essential requisites
The is marriage voidable
3. Irregularity in any of the formal requisites
Does NOT affect the validity of the marriage BUT will hold the party responsible
for such irregularity liable
Persons Authorized To Solemnize Marriages: (PMJCCC)
1. priests, rabbis, and ministers of any church
2. municipal and city mayors
3. members of the judiciary
4. ship captains or air plane chiefs
5. commanders of military unit, in the absence of chaplain
6. consul generals, consuls or vice-consuls
Authorized Venues Of Marriage
GENERAL RULE: Must be solemnized publicly, and not elsewhere, in the:
1. chambers of the judge or in open court
2. church, chapel or temple
3. office of consul-general, consul or vice-consul
EXCEPTIONS:
1. marriage at the point of death (articulo mortis);
2. marriage in remote places
3. marriage at a house or place designated by the parties with the written request to the
solemnizing officer
Marriages Exempt From License Requirement: (MOLAR)
1. among Muslims or members of ethnic cultural communities, provided such were
solemnized in accordance with their customs, rites and practices
2. solemnized outside the Phil. where NO marriage license is required by the country
where they were solemnized
3. of a man and a woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least 5
years and without legal impediment to marry each other
NOTE: The 5-year period should be computed on the basis of a cohabitation as
husband and wife where the only missing factor is the marriage contract to validate
the union. This 5-year period should be the years immediately before the day of the
marriage and it should be a period of cohabitation characterized by exclusivity meaning no third party was involved at any time within the 5 years and continuity that is unbroken (Ninal vs. Bayadog, GR No. 133778 March 14, 2000).
NOTE: In the case of Manzano vs. Sanchez (G.R. No. MTJ-00-1329, March 08, 2001),
the Supreme Court laid down the requisites to avail the exemption under Article 34 of
the Family Code:
a. The man and woman must have been living together as husband and wife for at
least five years before the marriage;
b. The parties must have no legal impediment to marry each other;
c. The fact of absence of legal impediment between the parties must be present at
the time of marriage;
d. The parties must execute an affidavit stating that they have lived together for at
least five years [and are without legal impediment to marry each other; and
e. The solemnizing officer must execute a sworn statement that he had ascertained
the qualifications of the parties and that he had found no legal impediment to
their marriage
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
4. in articulo mortis
5. in remote places
NOTE: A marriage license is valid only for 120 days from date of issue, in any part of the
Philippines.
Foreign Marriages
Validity of marriage:
GENERAL RULE: Where one or both parties to the marriage are citizens of the
Philippines, the foreign marriage is valid in this country if solemnized in accordance with
the laws of the country of celebration.
EXCEPTIONS: Foreign marriages shall not be recognized in the Philippines if prohibited
because: (MABB-PIP)
1. contracted by a national who is below 18 years of age
2. bigamous or polygamous (except as provided for in Art. 41, FC)
3. contracted through mistake of one party as to the identity of the other
4. contracted following the annulment or declaration of nullity of a previous
marriage but before partition
5. void due to psychological incapacity
6. incestuous
7. void for reasons of public policy
Validity of divorce:
GENERAL RULE: A divorce validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse, capacitating
him/her to remarry can allow the Filipino to remarry.
EXCEPTION: The rule will not apply if the divorce was obtained by the Filipino spouse.
NOTE: A Filipino wife remains the lawful wife of the Filipino husband despite a decree of
divorce obtained abroad by the wife. However, if the wife is already a foreigner at the
time of the divorce, she ceases to be the lawful wife of the Filipino husband. This,
notwithstanding, if at the time of the marriage the wife was still a Filipino, and
subsequently acquires citizenship of another country, thereby rendering her to have the
legal capacity to obtain a decree of divorce, the Filipino husband remains a spouse of the
former. This situation is not covered by Art. 26, par.2 which requires that, at the time of
the marriage, one of the parties is already an alien.
VOID MARRIAGES
A. Due to absence of any of the essential requisites: (BB-LAPIS)
1. contracted by any party below 18 years of age even with parental consent
2. solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform marriages unless one or
both of the parties believed in good faith that the solemnizing officer had the legal
authority to do so
3. solemnized without a license except as otherwise provided
4. bigamous or polygamous marriages
5. marriages contracted through mistake of one of the parties as to the identity of the
other
6. subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53 of the Family Code
7. contracted by a party who at the time of the marriage was psychologically
incapacitated
B. Incestuous marriages, whether the relationship be legitimate or illegitimate
(Article 37):
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
10
Subsequent marriages
without judicial declaration of nullity of previous void marriage (Article 40)
without judicial declaration of presumptive death of absent spouse (Article 41)
where the spouse was presumed dead, and both the present spouse and would-be
spouse were in bad faith in contracting marriage (Article 44)
NOTE: Where there was failure to record in the civil registry and registry of property the
judgment of annulment or of absolute nullity of the marriage, partition and distribution of
the property of the spouses and the delivery of the childrens presumptive legitimes it
shall not affect third persons (Articles 52-53).
NOTE: Even if a marriage is void, it must be declared void first because the parties cannot
decide for themselves the invalidity of their marriage.
VOID
VOIDABLE
Decree of nullity
Decree
of
annulment
Never be ratified
Ratified by free
cohabitation
Attacked directly or Attacked
directly
collaterally
only
Co-ownership
Conjugal
Partnership
Always void
Valid until annulled
Action for
Action prescribes
declaration of
nullity does not
prescribe
Psychological Incapacity
no exact definition but is restricted to psychological incapacity to comply with the
essential marital obligations of marriage
involves a senseless, protracted and constant refusal to comply with the essential
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
marital obligations by one or both of the spouses although he, she or they are
physically capable of performing such obligations (Chi Ming Tsoi vs. CA)
For purposes of remarriage, the only legally acceptable basis for declaring a
previous marriage an absolute nullity is a final judgment declaring such previous
marriage void, whereas, for purposes other than remarriage, other evidence is
acceptable. (Domingo vs. CA)
In a case for concubinage, the accused need not present a final judgment
declaring his marriage void for he can adduce evidence in the criminal case of the
nullity of his marriage other than proof of a final judgment declaring his marriage void.
Hence, the pendency of the civil action for nullity of marriage does not pose a
prejudicial question in a criminal case for concubinage.
Parties to the marriage should not be permitted to judge for themselves its
nullity, for the same must be submitted to the judgment of the competent courts and
only when the nullity of the marriage is so declared can it be held as void, and so long
as there is no such declaration, the presumption is that the marriage exists for all
intents and purposes. Therefore, he who cohabits with a woman not his wife, before
the judicial declaration of nullity of the marriage, assumes the risk of being prosecuted
for concubinage. (Beltran vs. People, June 20, 2000)
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
12
BIGAMOUS MARRIAGES
GENERAL RULE: A marriage contracted by any person during the subsistence of a
previous valid marriage shall be null and void.(Gomez vs. Lipana)
EXCEPTIONS: When the following conditions concur, the subsequent bigamous marriage
shall be valid:
1. absence of the other spouse must have been for four consecutive years, or two
years where there was danger of death
2. well-founded belief of the present spouse that absent spouse was already dead
3. judicial declaration of presumptive death
EFFECTS OF TERMINATION OF SUBSEQUENT MARRIAGE: (ICADI)
1. Children of the subsequent marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be
considered legitimate;
2. The absolute community or conjugal partnership shall be dissolved and liquidated. If
either spouse acted in bad faith, his/her share in the net profits shall be forfeited:
a. in favor of the common children;
b. if none, in favor of the children of the guilty spouse by previous marriage; or
c. in default of children, in favor of the innocent spouse;
3. Donations by reason of the marriage remain valid except if the donee contracted the
marriage in bad faith;
4. The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the spouse in bad faith as the
beneficiary in any insurance policy; and
5. The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith shall be disqualified
to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate or intestate succession.
NOTE: The above effects apply in voidable bigamous marriages. Except for (1), the above
effects also apply to marriages which are annulled or declared void ab initio under Art. 40
of the Code.
DECLARATION OF PRESUMPTIVE DEATH
Requisites: (MR-BF)
1. That the absentee spouse has been missing for 4 consecutive years or 2 consecutive
years if the disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under
circumstances laid down in Art.391 of the NCC
2. The present spouse wishes to remarry;
3. The present spouse has well-founded belief that the absentee is Dead;
4. The present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive
death.
NOTE: The present spouse must establish that he had a well-founded belief required by
law that his absent wife was already dead that would sustain the issuance of a court order
declaring presumptive death. In the case of RP vs. Nolasco, The SC believed that
respondent Nolasco failed to conduct a search for his missing wife with such diligence as
to give rise to a well-founded belief that she is dead. When he arrived in San Jose,
Antique after learning of his wifes departure, instead of seeking the help of local
authorities or of the British embassy, he secured another seamans contract and went to
London, a vast city of many millions of inhabitants, to look for her there. (RP vs. Nolasco)
Effect of Reappearance of Absent Spouse:
GENERAL RULE:
The subsequent bigamous marriage under Article 41 remains valid
despite reappearance of the absentee spouse.
EXCEPTION: If the reappearance was made in a sworn statement recorded in the civil
registry, the subsequent marriage is automatically terminated.
EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: If there was a previous judgment annulling or declaring
the first marriage a nullity, the subsequent bigamous marriage remains valid.
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
Grounds: (UP-FAVS)
1. Age of the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the marriage annulled was 18
years of age or over but below 21, and the marriage was solemnized without the
consent of the parents, guardian or person exercising substitute parental authority
over the party, in that order, and both lived together as husband and wife;
2. Unsound mind of either party
3. Fraudulent means of obtaining consent of either party
4. Vitiated consent of either party through force, intimidation or undue influence
5. Physical incapability of either party to consummate the marriage with the other, and
such incapacity continues and appears to be incurable
6. Sexually-transmissible disease of either party found to be serious and appears to be
incurable
NOTE: Mode of ratification for Nos. 1-4 is COHABITATION. In Nos. 5 & 6, there is no
ratification to speak of since the defect is permanent. The latter can be convalidated only
by prescription, i.e. 5 years from the date of marriage. Specifically, in no.5, the healthy
spouse may still annul the marriage within 5yrs. after celebration.
Circumstances amounting to Fraud under Article 46: (SPND)
1. Non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final judgment of the other party of a
crime involving moral turpitude;
2. Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of the marriage, she was
Pregnant by a man other than her husband;
3. Concealment of a Sexually transmissible disease, regardless of its nature, existing at
the time of the marriage; and
4. Concealment of Drug addiction, habitual alcoholism, homosexuality or lesbianism
existing at the time of the marriage.
NOTES:
Misrepresentation as to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity is not a ground for
annulment.
The enumeration in Article 46 is EXCLUSIVE. (Anaya vs. Palaroan)
Ground
(F2I2NS)
Persons
Who May
Sue
1.Force,
Injured party
intimidation
, or undue
influence
2. Fraud
Injured party
Prescripti
ve Period
w/in
5
years from
the
time
the force,
intimidatio
n, or undue
influence
ceased
w/in
5
years from
the
discovery
of
fraud
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
14
w/in
5
years after
the
celebration
of
the
marriage
4. Insanity
(a)
sane
spouse who
has
no
knowledge of
the insanity
(b) relatives,
guardians or
persons having
legal
charge of the
insane
(c)
insane
spouse
5. Nonconsent
(a)
parent/
legal
guardian
having charge
of the noconsent
party
(b)
no
consent
party
Injured party
(a) anytime
before the
death
of
either party
(b) anytime
before the
death
of
either party
(c) during
lucid
interval or
after
regaining
sanity
(a) anytime
before the
no
consent
party
reaches 21
(b) w/in 5
years after
reaching 21
6. STD
w/in
5
years after
the
celebration
of
the
marriage
NOTE: In Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, when cohabitation takes place after the defect ceases to
exist, the prescriptive period is rendered moot and academic. Whichever comes first may
convalidate the marriage: Cohabitation or Prescription.
Requisites for annulment due to Impotence under Art.45(5) (CUPIN)
a. Impotence exists at the time of the celebration of the marriage
b. The impotence is permanent
c. incurable
d. The impotence is unknown to the other spouse
e. The other spouse must not also be impotent
Doctrine of Triennial Cohabitation
presumption that the husband is impotent should the wife still remain a virgin after 3
years of living together with her husband.
Requisites for annulment due to Disease under Article 45(6) (ICSIIF)
1. Either party is inflicted with a sexually transmissible disease (STD)
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNULMENT OR DECLARATION OF NULLITY
1.Prosecuting attorney or fiscal should:
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
16
Cooling-off Period 6 months period designed to give the parties enough time to
further contemplate their positions with the end in view of attaining reconciliation
between them.
The enumeration in Article 55 regarding legal separation is EXCLUSIVE. (Lacson vs. San
Jose-Lacson)
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Requisites:
made before celebration of marriage
in writing (even modifications)
signed by the parties
not prejudice third persons unless registered in the civil registry
to fix terms and conditions of their property relations
additional signatories
a. 18-21: parents
b. civil interdictees & disabled: guardian
1.
2.
3.
DONATIONS
PROPTER
NUPTIAS
ORDINARY
DONATIONS
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
18
rules on ordinary
donations except
that if future
property is
donated, it must
conform with
formalities of wills
Governed
by rules on
donations
(Arts. 725773, NCC)
Grounds
Art. 86, FC
for
revocation
Arts. 760,
764, & 765,
NCC
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
First, pay out of community assets, if not enough, husband and wife are solidarily liable
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
20
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
the husband in satisfying the obligation subject of the surety agreement. A contrary
view would put in peril the conjugal partnership property by allowing it to be given
gratuitously as in cases of donation of conjugal partnership property, which is
prohibited. (Ayala Investment Corp. vs. CA)
Grounds For Termination Of Absolute Community And Conjugal Partnership: (LADS)
1. decree of legal separation
2. annulment or declaration of nullity of marriage
3. death of either spouses
4. judicial separation of property
REGIME OF SEPARATION OF PROPERTY
Causes: (CLAAPS)
a. petitioners spouse has been sentenced with a penalty which carries with it civil
interdiction;
b. loss of parental authority of the petitioners spouse as decreed by the court;
c. petitioners spouse has been judicially declared an absentee;
d. abandonment by the petitioners spouse and failure to comply with the obligations to
the family;
e. spouse granted power of administration in marriage settlement abused such power;
and
f. at the time of the petition, spouses are separated in fact for at least 1 year and the
possibility for reconciliation is highly improbable.
NOTE: The spouses contribute to the family expenses proportionately with their income
and the value of their properties. However, the liability of the spouses to the creditors for
family expenses is solidary.
PROPERTY REGIME OF UNIONS WITHOUT MARRIAGE
Art. 147
Art. 148
Applicability
1. Without
legal
impediment to
marry
2. Void
marriages due
to absence of
formal
requisite
1. With legal
impediment to
marry
2. Adulterous
relationships
3. Bigamous or
polygamous
marriages
4. Incestuous
void marriages
under Art. 37
5. Void
marriages by
reason of
public policy
under Art. 38
Separately
owned by the
parties
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
22
Party
acquired it by
exclusive funds
Property
Acquired
by Both
Parties
Governed by
the rules on
coownership
Presumption
(prima
facie)
Presumption
of joint
acquisition
and equal
sharing as to
property
acquired
while they
live
together.
one of the
parties is in
good faith,
the share of
the party in
bad faith in
the coownership
shall be
forfeited:
a. in favor
of their
common
children; or
b. in default
of or in case
of waiver by
any or all of
the common
children or
their
descendants,
in favor of
the innocent
party.
Owned by
them in
common in
proportion to
their
respective
contributions
No
presumption of
joint
acquisition.
When there is
evidence of
joint
acquisition but
none as to the
extent of
actual
contribution,
there is a
presumption of
equal sharing.
If one of the
parties is
validly married
to another,
his/her share
in the coownership
shall accrue to
the absolute
community or
conjugal
partnership
existing in
such valid
marriage.
If the party
who acted in
bad faith is not
validly married
to another or
if both parties
are in bad
faith, such
share shall be
forfeited in
the manner
provided in the
last paragraph
of Article 147.
NOTE: Under Art. 148, only the properties acquired by both of the parties through their
actual joint contribution of money, property or industry shall be owned by them in
proportion to their respective contributions. It must be stressed that actual contribution
is required by this provision, in contrast to Art. 147 which state that efforts in the care
and maintenance of the family and household, are regarded as contributions to the
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
acquisition of common property by one who has no salary or income or work or industry.
If the actual contribution of the party is not proved, there will be no co-ownership and
no presumption of equal shares. (Agapay vs. Palang). Hence, mere cohabitation without
proof of contribution will not result in a co-ownership. (Tumlos vs. Fernandez).
THE FAMILY
Basic social institution which public policy cherishes and protect hence, no suit
between members of the family shall prosper unless the compromise between the
parties have failed
FAMILY RELATIONS INCLUDE:
1. between husband and wife
2. between parents and children
3. among ascendants and descendants
4. among brothers and sisters whether full or half-blood
FAMILY HOME
GENERAL RULE: The family home is exempt from execution, forced sale or attachment.
EXCEPTIONS: (PLMN)
1. debts incurred prior to constitution
2. debts due to laborers, mechanics, architects, builders, material men and others
who have rendered service or furnished materials for the construction of the
building
3. debts secured by mortgages
4. non-payment of taxes
Guidelines:
deemed constituted from time of actual occupation as a family residence
must be owned by person constituting it
must be permanent
rule applies to valid and voidable and even to common-law spouses under Articles 147
and 148
5. continues despite death of one or more spouses or unmarried head of the family for
10 years, or as long as a minor beneficiary lives
6. can constitute one (1) family home only
1.
2.
3.
4.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
24
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
2. to second marriage, if child was born after 180 days following celebration of 2 nd
marriage whether born within 300 days after termination of 1 st marriage or
afterwards.
Proof of Filiation
GENERAL RULE: Filiation of legitimate (or illegitimate) children is established by any of
the following:
1. The record of birth appearing in the civil registrar or a final judgment
2. An admission of legitimate (or illegitimate) filiation in a public document or a private
handwritten instrument and signed by the parent concerned.
EXCEPTION: In the absence of any of the foregoing evidence, such legitimate or
illegitimate filiation shall be proved by:
1. Open and continuous possession of the status of a legitimate or illegitimate child;
2. Any other means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws.
NOTES:
Continuous does not mean that the concession of status shall continue forever but
only that it shall not be of an intermittent character while it is continuous. The
possession of such status means that the father has treated the child as his own,
directly and not through others, spontaneously and without concealment though
without publicity. There must be a showing of permanent intention of the supposed
father to consider the child as his own by continuous and clear manifestation of
paternal affection and care. (Mendoza vs. CA). The paternal affection and care must
not be attributed to pure charity. Such acts must be of such a nature that they
reveal not only the conviction of paternity, but also the apparent desire to have and
treat the child as such in all relations in society and in life, not accidentally, but
continuously. (Jison vs. CA)
The SC in Lim vs. CA, ruled that petitioner was the father of his illegitimate children
because the evidences convincingly show this. Hence, it was the petitioner who paid
the bills for the hospitalization of the mother when she gave birth. He was the one
who caused the registration of the name of the child using his surname in the birth
certificate. He also wrote handwritten letters to the mother and the child stating his
promise to be a loving and caring husband and father to both of you. There were
also pictures of the petitioner on various occasions cuddling the child.
In view of the fact that filiation may be proved by any means allowed by the Rules of
Court and special laws this may consist of baptismal certificate, a judicial admission,
a family bible in which his name has been entered, common reputation respecting his
pedigree, admission by silence, the testimony of witnesses and such other kinds of
proof admissible under Rule 130 of RC. (Mendoza vs. CA) For a baptismal certificate to
be proof of filiation under the Rules of Court, it must be shown that the father
therein participated in the preparation of the same. A birth certificate not signed by
the alleged father indicated in said certificate is not competent evidence of paternity.
(Fernandez vs. CA)
Proof of filiation of petitioners to the late Enrique Baluyut is not sufficient to confer
upon them any hereditary right in the estate of the deceased. What is necessary to be
established by an illegitimate not natural child in order that he may be entitled to
successional rights under Art 887 of NCC, is not the fact of his bare filiation but a
filiation acknowledged by the putative parent.(Baluyut vs. Baluyut)
Rights of the Children
LEGITIMATE
ILLEGITIMATE
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
26
Receive support
from parents
Entitled to the
legitime & other
successional rights
Use of mothers
surname
NOTE: However, RA
9255 amended
Article 176, FC
Receive support
according to FC
Legitime is of the
legitime of a
legitimate child
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
spouse
3) one who is married to a Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with his/her
spouse a relative within the 4 th degree of consanguinity or affinity of the
Filipino spouse
d. certified to have legal capacity to adopt by his/her diplomatic or consular office
e. certified by said office that his government allows the adoptee to enter his/her
country as his/her adopted child
3. Guardian with respect to the ward after termination of the guardianship and
clearance of his/her financial accountabilities
Pre-Adoption Services
the DSWD shall provide for the following services:
a. counselling services for the biological parents, prospective adoptive parents and
prospective adoptee
b. exhaust all efforts to locate the biological parents, if unkown
Rule on Adoption by Spouses
GENERAL RULE: The husband and the wife shall JOINTLY adopt.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. one spouse seeks to adopt the legitimate child of the other
2. one spouse seeks to adopt his/her own illegitimate child
3. the spouses are legally separated
Who may be adopted:
1. any person below 18 years of age who has been voluntarily committed to the DSWD
under P.D. 603 or judicially declared available for adoption
2. legitimate stepchild
3. illegitimate stepchild
4. qualified adult, who, prior to the adoption, has been consistently considered by the
adopter as his/her own child since minority;
5. child whose adoption has been previously rescinded
6. child whose biological or adoptive parents have died, provided that no proceedings
shall be initiated within 6 months from the time of death of said parents
Consent in Adoption (BAILAS)
The WRITTEN CONSENT to the adoption is required in the following cases:
1. the adoptee, if 10 years of age or over
2. biological parents or government instrumentality
3. the legitimate/adopted children, 10 years old or over, of the adopter and adoptee
4. the illegitimate children, 10 years old or over, of the adopter if living with the
adopter and the latter's spouse
5. spouse of the adopter and adoptee
Effectivity of Decree of Adoption
a decree of adoption shall be effective as of the date the original petition was
filed. It applies also in case the petitioner(s) dies before the issuance of the decree of
adoption to protect the interest of the adoptee.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
28
NOTE: Where the petition for adoption was granted after the child had shot and killed a
girl, the SC did not consider the retroactive effect to the decree of adoption so as to
impose a liability upon the adopting parents accruing at the time when the adopting
parents had no actual or physical custody over the adopted child. Retroactive effect
may perhaps be given to the granting of the petition for adoption where such is
essential to permit the accrual of some benefit or advantage in favor of the adopted
child. To hold that parental authority had been retroactively lodged in the adopting
parents so as to burden them with liability for a tortious act that they could not have
foreseen and which they could have prevented would be unfair and unconscionable.
(Tamargo vs. CA 209 S 518)
Effects of Adoption: (SAL)
1. Severance of legal ties between the biological parents and the adoptee and the same
shall be vested in the adopters.
EXCEPTION: if the biological parent is the spouse of the adopter
2. Adoptee shall be considered as a legitimate child of the adopter(s) for all intents and
purposes.
3. In legal or intestate succession, the adoptee and the adopter(s) shall have reciprocal
rights of succession without distinction from legitimate filiation. However, if there is a
will, the rules on testamentary succession shall be followed.
Rescission of Adoption
Grounds: (ASAR)
1. attempt on the life of the adoptee
2. sexual assault or violence
3. abandonment and failure to comply with parental obligations
4. repeated physical or verbal maltreatment by the adopter
NOTES:
Only the adoptee is given the right to rescind the decree of adoption
The adopter can NOT rescind the decree of the adoption but he or she may disinherit
the adoptee.
Effects:
a.
Parental authority of adoptees biological parents or legal custody of DSWD shall
be restored if adoptee is still a minor or incapacitated.
b.
Reciprocal rights and obligations of the adopter(s) and the adoptee to each other
shall be extinguished.
c.
The amended certificate of birth of the adoptee shall be cancelled and its original
shall be restored.
d.
Succession rights shall revert to its status prior to the adoption, but vested rights
shall not be affected.
B. Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995 (R.A. No. 8043)
Inter-Country Adoption
The socio-legal process of adopting a Filipino child by a foreigner or a Filipino citizen
permanently residing abroad where the petition is filed, the supervised trial custody is
undertaken, and the decree of adoption is issued outside the Philippines.
Who may be adopted:
a. Only a legally-free child may be the subject of inter-country adoption
NOTE: Legally-free Child - a child who has been voluntarily or involuntarily committed
to the DSWD of the Philippines, in accordance with the Child Youth and Welfare Code.
b. No child shall be matched to a foreign adoptive family unless it is satisfactorily shown
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
30
NOTE: For a comprehensive discussion of the procedural aspects of adoption, please refer
to A.M. No. 02-06-02-SC or the Remedial Law Memory Aid
SUPPORT
everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance,
education and transportation in keeping with the financial capacity of the family
Kinds: (LJC)
1. Legal that which is required or given by law
2. Judicial required by the court to be given whether pendente lite or in a final
judgment
3. Conventional given by agreement
Characteristics: (PIN-ERV)
1. Personal
2. Intransmissible
3. Not subject to waiver or compensation
4. Exempt from attachment or execution
5. Reciprocal on the part of those who are by law bound to support each other
6. Variable
Persons obliged to support each other:
1. spouses
2. legitimate ascendants and descendants
3. parents and their legitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of
the latter
4. parents and their illegitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of
the latter
5. legitimate brothers and sisters whether full or half-blood
NOTE: Support shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the
necessities of the recipient.
Order of liability if several persons are obliged to give support:
1. spouse
2. descendants in the nearest degree
3. ascendants in the nearest degree
4. brothers and sisters
NOTES:
When the obligation to give support falls upon 2 or more persons payment shall be
divided between them in proportion to the resources of each, but in case of urgent
need and special circumstances, the court may order one of them to furnish the
support provisionally subject to the right to claim from the other obligors the share
due them
When two or more recipients at the same time claim for support and the obligor does
not have sufficient means to satisfy all claims:
a. the order of liability provided by law shall be followed
b. if the concurrent obligees should be the spouse and child subject to parental
authority, the child shall be preferred
PARENTAL AUTHORITY (PA)
Rules as to the exercise of PA:
2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND SUBJECT
CHAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
1. The father and the mother shall JOINTLY exercise parental authority over the persons
of their common children. In case of disagreement, the fathers decision shall prevail
UNLESS there is a judicial order to the contrary
2. If the child is illegitimate, parental authority is with the mother.
Parental Preference Rule
the natural parents, who are of good character and who can reasonably provide for
the child are ordinarily entitled to custody as against all persons
Rule in case of legal separation of parents:
parental authority is exercised by the parent designated by the court.
GENERAL RULE: No child under 7 years of age shall be separated from the mother.
EXCEPTION: When the court finds compelling reason to order otherwise.
NOTE: Paramount consideration in matters of custody of a child is the welfare and wellbeing of the child. (Tonog vs. CA)
Persons Exercising Substitute PA:
1. surviving grandparent
2. oldest brother or sister over 21 years of age unless unfit or disqualified
3. actual custodian unless unfit or disqualified
Persons Exercising Special PA:
1. school
2. administrators and teachers
3. individual, entity or institution engaged in child care
NOTES:
Parental authority and responsibility are inalienable and may not be transferred and
renounced except in cases authorized by law.
Parents may exercise parental authority over their childs property
Kinds of Properties of a Minor
ADVENTITIOUS
PROFECTITIOUS
1. earned or acquired
by the child through
his work or industry by
onerous or gratuitous
title
2. owned by the child
1. property given by
the parents to the
child for the latter to
administer
the
2. owned by
parents
3. parents are
usufructuary
4.
property
administered by the
child
Termination of PA
PERMANENT
1. death
parents
of
the
the
TEMPORARY
1. adoption of the
child
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
32
2. death of the
child
3. emancipation of
the child
4. subjected child
to sexual abuse
2. appointment of a
general guardian
3.
judicial
declaration
of
abandonment
4. final judgment
divesting
the
parents of parental
authority
5.
judicial
declaration
of
absence or incapacity
of
the
parents exercising
parental authority
over the child
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda
Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan
Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law),
Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial
Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
MEMORY AID
WITHOUT
ADMINISTRATOR
WITH
ADMINISTRATOR
IN
CIVIL LAW
PRESUMPTION OF DEATH
ORDINARY
ABSENCE
EXTRAORDINARY/
QUALIFIED
ABSENCE
a. 7 YEARS, person
presumed dead for all
purposes except for
those
of
opening
succession
b.
10 YEARS, person
presumed dead for
purposes of opening
succession except if he
disappeared after the
age of 75, in which
case, a period of 5
years is sufficient
c.
4 YEARS, person
presumed dead for
purposes of remarriage
of the spouse present
For
all
purposes
including
those
of
opening succession, a
period of 4 YEARS, and
for
purposes
of
remarriage
of
the
spouse
present,
a
period of 2 YEARS, is
sufficient under the
following
circumstances:
a. person on board a
vessel lost during a sea
voyage or an aeroplane
which is missing; period
is counted from the
loss of the vessel or
aeroplane
b. person in the armed
forces who has taken
part in war
c. person in danger of
death
under
other
circumstances and his
existence has not been
known
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)