Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
101
INTRODUCTION
The todays world witnesses knowledge revolution in
different life aspects and levels. Knowledge capabilities
arisen by the technological, IT & Communication
technology, social and economic developments has been
a critical turning point towards the age of knowledge
characterized by plenty of facts, information and
cognition in every field, most importantly business
organization which further enhanced the rank of
knowledge from a strategic perspective as a leverage for
optimal performance, greater productivity, excellence and
competitiveness (Johnson & Scholes, 2001).
In addition, one can say that knowledge as a new
production element provided momentum for the more
classical production processes. Many researchers
(Cameron, 2000; Chang & Chuang, 2009; Davenport
& Prusak, 1998) emphasize the role of knowledge
management and develop knowledge strategically
to ensure positive outcomes since knowledge as a
production element is intangible that directly associates
with other resources in general and human resources, in
particular taking in mind that the knowledge component
influences the attitudes and believes of humans such
as employees, customers, suppliers and that cognitive
102
1. METHODS
1.1 Populations
In the present study, population consisted of all branch
banks (N=24) of the three commercial Islamic banks
under study (Jordan Islamic Bank, Jordan Dubai Islamic
Bank, and International Islamic Arab Bank) that have
offices in almost all governorates of Jordan. Bank
branches located in Capital Amman were excluded
in this study since they receive greater attention and
preferable treatment by Head Offices of the sampled
banks. In addition, all other non-Islamic or foreign banks
were excluded from the sample since the researcher
believes that such exclusion will increase accuracy
and generalizeability of results due to compatibility of
characteristics of the Islamic banks in study.
1.2 Participants
Participants were (220) employees recruited from the
different managerial levels of Jordanian branch Islamic
banks using the simple randomization, and representing
20 per cent of the original population (N=1101) employed
at the Jordanian Islamic banks (Jordan Banks Association,
2011). Questionnaires were administered to all participants,
among (186) questionnaires returned back, (18) were found
unusable for analysis leaving (168) questionnaires usable
for analysis representing 76 per cent of the sample which
is good for statistical and scientific research purposes and
allows for generalizeability of results.
1.3 Instrumentation
The present study adopts the questionnaire survey to
collect data from participants and was specifically
designed for that purpose in harmony with study
questions, objectives and variables. Validity was tested
by sending the questionnaire to judges and modify it in
accordance with their views and with goals of the author
regarding the study variables. Chronbach alpha coefficient
was measured to identify internal consistency among
responses of respondents to questionnaire items, which
was at (91%) for practice level of knowledge resource
diversification strategy management and (86%) for role of
knowledge resource diversification strategy management
in the increased level of organizational learning.
To measure the study variables, Liker 5-point scale
was used in which weighs are given as follow: Very
High Degree (5), High (4), Uncertain (3), Low (2), Very
Low (1). The scale used in the current study included the
following subscales:
103
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Concept of Knowledge
Turner & Minnonne (2010) pointed out that knowledge
is defined differently by different authors, and there is
conceptual confusion between knowledge and other
terms such as organizational learning, organizational
knowledge management, and intellectual capital. In this
section, the concepts of knowledge, knowledge strategy
and knowledge management clearly defined to remove
the conceptual confusion. Burnes (2002) described
knowledge as a set of characteristics, realities, beliefs,
visions, concepts methods and skillful performance. For
Kaniki & Mphahlele (2002) knowledge refers to a mix
of experiences and information owned by the individual,
organization or community that contributes to effective
achievement of goals. Johnson & Schools (2001)
referred to knowledge as Awareness, consciousness or
familiarity gained by experience or learning. It is defined
by Al Khasawneh (2013) as product of accumulated
information, experience, technological and scientific
skills that create excellence and can be acquired through
intensive work efforts, study and analysis.
On the other hand, knowledge management was
defined by Fernandez, et al (2004) as processing and
setting up the intellectual capital that is assembled
from various resources such databases, customers,
104
105
4. RELIABILITY TEST
To test for reliability, internal consistency was computed
for a pilot study sample of (30) of employees of the Islamic
banks using Chronbach alpha coefficient. The following
table shows resulting coefficients which considered
appropriate for the purpose of the present study.
4.1 Statistical Analysis
Table 1
Internal Consistency Chronbach Alpha
Area
Internal consistency
0.73
0.81
0.90
Overall application
0.91
0.81
0.80
0.78
Overall Role
0.86
Table 2
Frequencies & Percentages by Study Variable
Percentage%
106
Frequency
Category
57.1
96
42.9
72
16.1
27
Less than BA
57.1
96
BA
26.8
45
MA
33.3
56
5 Years of Less
34.5
58
6-10
32.1
54
100.0
168
Total
Sex
Academic
Qualification
Years of
Experience
Table 4
Means and Standard Deviations of the Contribution
of Knowledge Resource Diversification Strategy
Management (Hr Resources, Artifacts Made in the
Organization and Organizational Entities) to the Increase
of Organizational Learning at the Jordanian Banks in
Descending Order by Means
Rank No.
Area
SD
4.57 .370
4.30 .483
4.15 .647
Area
SD
Overall contribution
4.34 .368
4.23
.851
3.81
.802
3.74
.782
Overall application
3.93
.729
Rank
4.2 Variables
4.2.1 Sex
Table 5 shows no statistically significant differences
at (=0.05) attributed to sex effect on all areas and the
overall role.
Table 5
Means, Standard Deviations, and T-test of Sex Effect on the Contributory Role of Knowledge Resource
Diversification Strategy Management on the Increased Organizational Learning
Sex
Count
SD
96
4.20
.658
72
4.09
.633
96
4.55
3.88
72
4.58
.346
96
4.28
.537
72
4.33
.402
96
4.34
.404
72
4.34
.317
107
T-value
Freedom degrees
Significance
1.006
166
.316
-.496
166
.621
-.725
166
.469
.106
166
.916
Count
Category
.498
4.26
27
Less than BA
.539
4.28
96
BA
.813
3.82
45
Graduate
.647
4.15
168
Total
.271
4.60
27
Less than BA
.388
4.54
96
BA
.382
4.61
45
Graduate
.370
4.57
168
Total
.563
4.48
27
Less than BA
.395
4.35
96
BA
.542
4.09
45
Graduate
.483
4.30
168
Total
.382
4.45
27
Less than BA
.317
4.39
96
BA
.411
4.17
45
Graduate
.368
4.34
168
Total
Table 7
One Way Analysis of Variance of the Effect of Academic Qualification on the Contributory Role of Knowledge
Resource Diversification Strategy Management to Increased Organizational Learning
Source
Total squares
Freedom degrees
Mean squares
F-value
Statistical significance
Contributory role of HR in
the organization
Intergroup
6.911
3.455
9.036
.000
Intragroup
63.094
165
.382
Overall
70.004
167
Intergroup
.175
.087
.636
.530
Intragroup
22.635
165
.137
Overall
22.809
167
Intergroup
3.020
1.510
6.928
.001
Intragroup
35.962
165
.218
7.165
.001
Overall role
Overall
38.982
167
Intergroup
1.808
.904
Intragroup
20.822
165
.126
Overall
22.631
167
108
Table 8
Scheffee Post Hoc Comparisons of Academic Qualification Effect
M
Contributory role of HR resources in the
organization
Contributory role of the organizational entity
resources
Less than BA
Less than BA
4.26
BA
4.28
.02
Graduate
3.82
.44*
Less than BA
4.48
BA
4.35
.13
Graduate
4.09
.39*
Less than BA
4.45
BA
4.39
.06
Graduate
4.17
.28*
Overall role
BA
Graduate
.46*
.25*
.22*
Count
Category
.572
SD
4.25
56
5 years of less
.544
4.15
58
6-10
.802
4.06
54
More than 10
.647
4.15
168
Total
5 years of less
.354
4.62
56
.416
4.55
58
6-10
.332
4.53
54
More than 10
.370
4.57
168
Total
.527
4.25
56
5 years of less
.534
4.27
58
6-10
.359
4.39
54
More than 10
4.83
4.30
168
Total
.357
4.37
56
5 years of less
.357
4.32
58
6-10
.394
4.33
54
More than 10
.368
4.34
168
Total
Table 10
ANOVA Test Results on the Effect of Years of Experience on the Role of Knowledge Resource Diversification
Strategy on Increasing the Organizational Learning
Source
Total squares
Freedom degrees
Mean squares
F-value
Statistical significance
Intergroup
1.042
.521
1.246
.290
.418
.941
.392
Contributory role of HR
in the organization
Intragroup
68.963
165
Overall
70.004
167
Contributory role of
artifacts made by the
organization
Intergroup
.257
.129
Intragroup
22.552
165
.137
Overall
22.809
167
To be continued
109
Continued
Source
Contributory role of the
organizational entity
resources
Overall role
Total squares
Freedom degrees
Mean squares
F-value
Statistical significance
1.451
.237
.341
.712
Intergroup
.674
.337
Intragroup
38.308
165
.232
Overall
38.982
167
Intergroup
.093
.047
.137
Intragroup
22.538
165
Overall
22.631
167
5. RESULTS
Major findings from the current study are the following:
I. The application level of knowledge diversification
strategy management at the Islamic banks was high
(3.93), with the area of knowledge application using
the organizational entities in the first rank (M=4.23),
knowledge application through employing human
resources available to the organization in the second
rank (3.81), whereas knowledge application through the
artifacts made in the organization occupied the last rank
(M=3.74).
II. Results demonstrated that knowledge resource
diversification strategy management takes a significantly
high contributory part in leveraging organizational
learning among employees at the Jordanian Islamic banks
(M=4.34). The result was most perceived in the area
related to the role of artifact resources that occupied the
first rank (M=4.57), then the area related to resources of
organizational entities (M=4.30), and the area of human
resource ultimately (M=4.15).
III. There were no statistically significant differences
(=0.05) attributed to sex and experience regarding the
contributory role o knowledge resource diversification
strategy management; whereas statistical differences were
found attributed to academic qualification regarding the
contributory role of knowledge resource diversification
strategy management excluding role of artifacts made in
the organization.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the earlier findings, the author recommends that:
I. Top management at Jordan Islamic banks are
recommended to keep pace with most recent advances
in the knowledge resources, to support knowledge
capabilities, and pay greater attention to knowledge-based
strategies so that to strike balance between the different
knowledge resources. On the other hand, they are also
advised to increase the level of knowledge resources
by activating managerial practices, develop regulations
and rules, and make available the modern technology
REFERENCES
Ahmad, A., & Idris, M. (2008). Managing knowledge
management strategic management perspectives.
International Business Information Management
Association. Retrieved from www.ibimapublishing.com/
journals/CIBIMA/volume/v1n8.pdf
Al Khasawneh, A. (2013). Basics of information and library
organization management. Amman: Dar Ethraa Publishers.
Al-Bataineh, M. (2007). The effect of knowledge management on
organizational performance and learning in the Jordanian
Commercial Bank (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Amman
Arab University for Graduate Studies, Amman, Jordan.
Barnes, S. (2002). Knowledge management systems: Theory and
practice. London: Thomson Learning.
Cameron, P. (2000). Managing the wealth. CMA Management,
74(9), 46-49.
Cavaleri, S., & Fearon, D. (1996). Managing in organizations that
learn. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publisher Inc..
Chammzkoti, H., Namadchian, H., & Davoudi, S. (2012). A
study of the Impact of knowledge management on supply
chain capability. Spectrum: A Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research, 1(7), 1-9.
Chang, T., & Chuang, S. (2009). Performance effects of
knowledge management: Corporate management
characteristics and competitive strategy enablers. Asian
Journal of Management Humanity Sciences, 4(4), 181-199.
Dansh, R., & Nawaz, M. (2012). Impact of knowledge
management practices on organizational performance: An
evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Scientific
& Engineering Research, 3, 1-6.
Davenport, T., Delong, D., & Beers, M. (1998). Successful,
knowledge management projects. Sloan Management
Review, 39(2), 443-457.
110
111
www.ucv.es/jovellanos/documentos/DT_Jovellanos_3.pdf.
sited on May, 17/2013
Leiponen, A., & Heltat, C. (2010). Innovation objectives,
knowledge sources, and benefits of breadth. Strategic
Management Journal, 31, 224-236. doi:10.1002/smj.807
Madhoushi, M., & Amiri, M. (2011). Knowledge management
and organizational learning: The mutual impact. 2nd
International Conference on Business, Economics and
Tourism Management, IPEDR (pp.26-31), 24. LACSIT
Press Singapore.
Nurluoz, O., & Birol, C. (2011). The impact of knowledge
management and technology: An analysis of administrative
behaviors. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 15(1), 202-208.
Rasula, J., Vuksic, V., & Stemberger, M. (2012). The impact of
knowledge management on organizational performance.
Economic and Business Review, 14(2), 143-168.
Stevans, R. (2010). Managing human capital: How to use
knowledge, management to transfer knowledge in todays
multi generational workforce. International Business
Research, 3(3), 77-83.
Svetina, A., & Prodan , I. (2008) . How internal and external
sources of knowledge contribute to firms innovation
performance. Managing Global Transitions, 6(3), 277-299.
Turner, G., & Minonne, C. (2010). Measuring the effects of
knowledge management practices. Electronic Journal of
Knowledge, 8(1), 161-170.