The State Government has planned to construct a Steel Flyover
in Bangalore between Chalukya circle and Hebbal Flyover. This structure, which will be around 7 km in length, will cost the exchequer over Rs.2000Cr and will result in the chopping of over 800 trees. Understandably, this has caused widespread indignation among the common citizens. There have been protests by both the camps Beku (we want) and Beda (we dont want). Ravi Chandran of TrafficInfraTech talked to Sathyanarayanan Sankaran, a civic interventionist at the forefront of the Beda campaign. In this article Sathya dwells at length on how the Steel Flyover is part of the larger malaise of Urban Planning that affects our cities. The Crux of the Problem The steel flyover is a solution to a problem, but we are defining the problem itself wrong. If you went to an engineer and said give me a solution that will tackle 5000 PCUs (passenger car units), he will build one for you, with the proper structure and specifications. If you ask him to build one for 40000 PCUs he will build one for you, but are you even asking him the right question? This is how we operate today. An airport is built and someone says we need a highway, so go ahead and build it. Now there is congestion, so go ahead and build a steel flyover. So we are reacting constantly. The steel flyover is a symptom of a problem, a symptom of chasing what we have today on our
68
OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 16 / TrafficInfraTech
roads. The authorities are not thinking about what
they want the city to be. If they think about it, and then come up with a Steel Flyover then maybe it will be an idea worth considering, but it is not proven that they are looking five or 10 years down the line.
A crisis of Leadership and Vision
Other cities have the vision to look ahead, but our leaders dont seem to be politically savvy enough to have a vision, to say I can sell a vision of better quality of life to the people. Many leaders appreciate the good thing happening in the western countries but feel Indians will not accept these initiatives. If they can do it, so can we. I would like everyone to watch the film Bogota Change which is about two people in Colombia
www.trafficinfratech.com
INFRASTRUCTURE
who made a change to their city with
their own efforts. They were people who were fed up, pushed to the brink and then they did something. The question is does Bangalore need to go that far? Its like climate change, you dont see it, you dont feel it, but when it hits you every summer you go ahead and make these changes. The Steel Flyover is a small example of what is happening in Bangalore today. The IT boom will come and go; the start-up ecosystem will come and go; the needs are different. But there are certain basic issues in a liveable city. These are simple to define. For example, air pollution its easy to set an acceptable limit on particulate matter level in the atmosphere. Then comes modal share. Just say that 20% of traffic will be cycling and walking, 60% will be allocated for public transport (bus or metro) and whatever is left will be for private traffic. Then resources have to be allocated appropriately. Plazas and public places have to be created where people can walk and sit around, not just fly over them.
Beku vs. Beda
Its just that that the Beku people (including the government and the Chief Minister) feel we need to solve todays problems. They say that there is congestion on the road and we need to solve that. There is less capacity, so if we add six more lanes to the existing six, we can double the capacity. Its like a pipe. If less water is flowing, increase the width of the pipe so more water can flow double the lanes and double the capacity as simple as that. The Beda people feel it will not solve the problem in the long term. It is backed by scientific research. Just like you have the climate change deniers, the Beku people are closing their eyes to the future problems. It has been proven by the University of Berkeley that every lane you add will get filled to capacity in five years. Its called the theory of induced demand.
www.trafficinfratech.com
In five years, before the project is even
completed, we will be right back where we started. It may solve the problem for some time, may be an year. There will also be traffic jams at the entry point in Chalukya.
Some Other Examples
The Bangalore elevated toll way to electronic city was expected to solve many problems. However, it has created problems for region under the flyover. The poles are dropped without planning and proper design. For example, in Tumkur Road, the metro pillar drops askew on the highway, reducing four lanes to one and a half. This is because the Metro contractor is only responsible for laying out the Metro line. He does not claim any responsibility for what is below it. In the case of the Steel Flyover, who is actually taking care of North Bangalore people? Take the example of the airport flyover. 30% of the people may use it, but the remaining 70% will use the road below. The majority of the people who have been affected have not been shown a plan of what it looks like below. The contractor does not have a plan because he was not told to design it. Who is responsible for all these things that are not integrated?
The aerial nature of the city
should not be spoilt. Instead of flyovers, we can tunnel underground. Even that is not without problems and may take years, but is better than what we have currently. We have to be very careful about what we do. The surface is something we need to preserve and protect for our quality of life. Sathyanarayanan Sankaran
TrafficInfraTech / OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 16 69
INFRASTRUCTURE
more should be given off for cycles or
public transport.
Designing for traffic
Changing the character of
the city The most important aspect of these projects is that it changes the character of the place. The surface of the planet as it exists today has certain features like soil and trees that cannot exist on top of a flyover, for example. One of the things every city has discovered is that we need to keep the surface for the people. The elevated structures destroy this surface by not only spoiling the visual element of the place but also by bringing in unlawful elements underneath. Every time an engineering structure is put up, it needs to go through an urban design principle does it add value in totality. There are many layers to be looked at (for example, the flood plain) in the case of the Steel flyover. We need to ask, why we are moving these people to the airport in the first place. Studies showed that 30% of people at Windsor Manor would use the airport flyover. It changed to 50% at Mehkri Circle. This is because there is an uncompleted flyover project on Outer Ring Road nearby. It has been languishing for ages and the traffic conditions are unbearable. To avoid this route, everyone diverts to Mehkri Circle, thereby increasing the traffic there. If the planners had provided all
70
OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 16 / TrafficInfraTech
these alternate roads in advance, people
from Whitefield or Indiranagar could use those to connect directly.
Moving away from the car
paradigm Everyone complains that the traffic is too much, but it is mostly due to car traffic. We have been sold the idea of the car as a lifestyle value, but it causes many environmental problems. Why not a good public transport system? Today many people find it inconvenient to use buses. They dont even know where the bus starts and ends. We have been pushing for developing the Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA). It should really go into details of what we talked about in the context of the Steel Flyover. What is the character of the city; what are the modal targets for 2030 and how does this flyover add or subtract to that. Lets say the modal target for cars is 20% whereas now it is 40%. That means 20% of the cars need to go off the street. Who is making that decision today on how many cars should go off the street and how do they go off the street? How much should we levy as congestion charges? Many citizens like me feel that inside the Outer Ring Road we should have not more than two lanes for cars. Anything
If you look at the Steel Flyover, at
three different points, the lanes merge. Traffic merges like a zipper. It has certain characteristics. You need to ramp up the velocity of traffic on the side road to the same speed as the main carriageway. So adequate merging distance needs to be provided. There is an acceleration distance for cars. To ramp up from 20 kmph to 60 kmph, a certain time and distance are required which must be provided for. After ramping up, you need to provide enough spacing between the cars. Merges are the most expensive, even in advanced car based countries. We are doing merging in a very haphazard manner. Many roads join at a right angle to the main carriageway. Service roads are actually collector roads, but we dont treat them like that. We have shops and offices exiting into the main carriageway and we then treat the service roads not as collector roads but as the main carriageway. Often there is confusion as to where the twoway service road ends and the one-way exit ramp begins. We dont understand the basics of design. In half the places, we do not even know how to draw parallel lines! The bottom line is that we dont have proper engineers to do the job. We see in so many places for example, five lanes coming into a signal, and on the other side we have only three lanes. Whats going to happen to the traffic? All this is the result of thinking in a segment or corridor approach. It is a failure of engineering. Now what the planners are doing is flying over the problem. Essentially, it is like saying that I dont know or dont have the patience to solve the problem on the ground, so I will fly over it. The Steel Flyover is escapism. It is not about finding a solution to the problem, it is not about sustainability. The fact is there is no vision, so no clear goal.