References

Anderson, K. A. (2008). Increasing participation of students with special needs with an

interactive whiteboard: A grant proposal. University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie,
Wisconsin.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visualisation in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies
in Mathematics, 52, 215241.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teaching professional development in teaching and teacher education over
ten years, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1020.
Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of students and teachers towards the use of interactive
whiteboards in elementary and secondary school classrooms. The Turkish Online Journal
of Educational Technology, 14(2), 1523.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching
mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 5173.
Banda, D. R., Matuszny, R. M., & Therrien, W. J. (2009). Enhancing motivation to complete
math tasks using the high-preference strategy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3),
146150.
Basilicato, A. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Assistive technology for every classroom.
Today's School, 5(5), 4445.
Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive
whiteboards help? Action Research Exchange, 1(1).
Bennett, M., & Parise, M. (2014). Computer technology: Possibilities and pitfalls, Childhood
Education, 90(5), 365369.
Bidaki, M. Z., & Mobasheri, N. P. (2013). Teachers views of the effects of the interactive white
board on teaching. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 140144.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning
environments: A review of literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 5(3), 235245.
Branzburg, J. (2008). The whiteboard revolution. Technology & Learning, 28(9), 44.
Brigham, T. J. (2013). Smart boards: A remerging technology, Medical Reference Services
Quarterly, 32(2), 194202.
Brooks-Young, S. (2007). Digital-age literacy for teachers: Applying technology standards to
everyday practice. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

Buyukbaykal, C. I. (2015). Communication technologies and education in the information age.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 636640.
Bynum, S. L. (2011). Utilizing social media to increase student engagement: A study of Kern
County public schools (Masters Thesis). California State University, Bakersfield.
Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED526312
Callison, D. (2004). Key words in instruction: Digital divide. School Library Media Activities
Monthly, 20(6), 3751.
Chamberlin, M., & Powers, R. (2010). The promise of differentiated instruction for enhancing
the mathematical understandings of college students. Teaching Mathematics and Its
Applications, 29(3), 113139.
Combs, H. (2010). Instructional technology: Status in middle and high school social studies.
Nation Teacher Education Journal, 3(3), 2331.
Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology influence
student learning? Learning & Leading with Technology, 29(8), 4656.
Criss, E. (2011). Dance all night. Music Educators Journal, 97(3), 6166.
Daggett, W. R. (2010). Preparing students for their technological future. International Center for
Leadership in Education, Retrieved from
http://www.leadered.com/pdf/PreparingStudents for Tech Future white paper.pdf.
Devlin, T. J., Feldhaus, C. R., & Bentrem, K. M. (2013). The evolving classroom: A study of
traditional and technology-based instruction in a STEM classroom. Journal of
Technology Education, 25(1).
Dohn, N. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International
Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 343-363.
Efaw, J., Hampton, S., Martinze, S., & Smith, S. (2004). Miracle or menace: Teaching and
learning with laptop computers in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 27(3), 1019.
FitzPatrick, S. B. (2001, November). Students' experiences of the implementation of an
interactive learning system in their eighth grade mathematics classes: An exploratory
study. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470137
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M., Schall, L. J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J.
(2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science
engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 515.
Friesen, N. (2013). The past and likely future of an educational form: A textbook case.
Educational Researcher, 42(9), 498508.

Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A learning
revolution? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British
primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 243256.
Glover, D., & Law, S. (2002). Improving learning: Professional practice in secondary schools.
Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the largescale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of
Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257277.
Glover, D., Miller, D., & Averis, D. (2004, July). Panacea or prop: The role of the interactive
whiteboard in improving teaching effectiveness. In the Tenth International Congress of
Mathematics Education.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature
survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for
teachers using the interactive whiteboards in mathematics and modern languages: An
empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 5
20.
Goodwin, K. (2008). The impact of interactive multimedia on kindergarten students
representations of fractions. Issues in Educational Research 18(2), 103117.
Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P. H., & Guerin, D. W. (2007).
Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math
motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of
Behavioral Development, 31, 317327.
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Education. (2011). Whiteboard
technology helping prepare students for the future [Press release]. Retrieved from
http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2011/edu/1103n02.htm
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students perceptions of interactive whiteboards.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102117.
Hall, J., & Chamblee, G. (2010). High school mathematics teachers and interactive whiteboards:
A longitudinal study of 2 users and 2 future-users, Year 3. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge
(Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education
international conference (pp. 34403447). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Hall, J., Chamblee, G., & Hughes, T. (2008). Teacher perceptions of interactive whiteboards: A
comparison of users and future-users in high school and middle school mathematics. In
K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for
information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 44614467).
Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Handler, M. K. (2011). An evaluation of the effectiveness of SMART board technology by
evaluating the students ability of completing their work with a focus on students with
disabilities (Masters thesis). Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for
using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science.
Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283301.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st
century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society,
19(3), 2737.
Hidden Curriculum. (2016). The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from
http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive
whiteboards. Learning, Media, & Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
Holland, L., & Moore-Steward, T. (2000). A different divide: Preparing tech-savvy leaders.
Leadership, 30(1). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ614619
Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to
pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology,25(3), 351-365.
Hopkins, J. (2004). Assistive technology (AT) to support students with special needs. Retrieved
from http://curriculum.org/storage/108/1278482872AssistiveTechnology.pdf
Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: Individualizing
technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239262.
Irvin, J. L., Meltzer, J., & Dukes, M. S. (2007). Taking action on adolescent literacy. Alexandria,
VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jackson, R. M. (2004). Technologies supporting curriculum access for students with
disabilities. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
Jamerson, J. (2002). Helping all children learn: Action research project.
Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/5067161.pdf

Kennewell S. (2001). Interactive whiteboards yet another solution looking for a problem to
solve? Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39, 36.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their
influence on learning, Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
Kent, P. (2006). Using interactive whiteboards to enhance mathematics teaching. Australian
Primary Mathematics Classroom, 11(2), 23-26.
Konstantinou-Katzi, P., Tsolaki, E., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Koutselini, M. (2012).
Differentiation of teaching and learning mathematics: An action research study in tertiary
education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,
44(3), 332-349.
Kumari, M., & Rani, S. (2014). Interactive white board and achievement motivation. Monthly
Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(10).
Lamberth, T. (2012). Interactive whiteboard use: The catalyst of student achievement. New
York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of
educational technology (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.
Lefebvre, S., Deaudelin, D., & Loiselle, J. (2006). ICT implementation stages of primary school
teachers: The practices and conceptions of teaching and learning. Paper presented at the
Australian Association for Research in Education National Conference, Adelaide,
Australia.
Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between
technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3),
455-472.
Lewin, C., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B., & Haldane, M. (2009). The impact of formal and
informal professional development opportunities on primary teachers adoption of
interactive whiteboards. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 17385.
Linder, S. M. (2012). Interactive whiteboards in early childhood mathematics: Strategies for
effective implementation in pre-k-grade 3. YC Young Children, 67(3), 26-35.
Manzo, K. K. (2010). Whiteboards' impact on teaching seen as uneven. Education Week Digital
Directions, 3(2), 34.
Marzano, R. (2009). Evaluation study of the effects of promethean activclassroom on student
achievement. Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratory.

McMurty, Z., & Burkett, C. (2010). Technology and its role in teacher education. In S. Blake &
S. Izumi-Taylor (Eds) Technology for early childhood education and socialization:
Developing applications and methodologies (pp. 94113). Hersey, PA: Information
Science Reference.
McQuillan, K., Northcote, M., & Beamish, P. (2012). What matters most when students and
teachers use interactive whiteboards in mathematics classrooms? Australian Primary
Mathematics Classroom, 17(4), 37.
Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings,
generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 30(1), 6588
Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. A. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of
mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational
Technology, 51(2), 22-28.
Moeller, B., & Reitzes, T. (2011). Integrating technology with student-centered learning. A
Report to the Nellie Mae Education Foundation. Education Development Center, Inc.
Morgan, A. (2010). Interactive whiteboards, interactivity and play in the classroom with children
aged three to seven years. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal,
18(1), 93104.
Morgan, G. L. (2008). Improving student engagement: Use of the interactive whiteboard as an
instructional tool to improve engagement and behavior in the junior high school
classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia.
Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: Whats offered by
interactive whiteboard technology. Teaching Science, 56(1), 2329.
Musanti, S. I., & Pence, L. (2010). Collaboration and teacher development: Unpacking
resistance, constructing knowledge, and navigating identities. Teacher Education
Quarterly, 37(1), 7389.
Oigara, J. N., & Wallace, N. (2012). Modeling, training, and mentoring teacher candidates to use
SMART board technology. Issues in Information Science and Information Technology, 9,
297-315.
Olsen, A., LeMire, S., & Baker, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy and peer support on
student participation with interactive white boards in the middle school math class.
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(2), 163-178.
Pacurar, E. & Chad, N. (2015). Interactive whiteboards and digital teaching book to secondary
school teachers and contextual affordances: Hybrid or substitute? Journal of Educational
Technology Systems, 43(3), 266288.

Parmeter, C. (2012). Student learning engagement with SMART boards in reader's workshop
(Masters thesis). St. John Fisher College, Rochester, New York.
Polly, D. (2014). Elementary school teachers use of technology during mathematics
teaching. Computers in the Schools, 31(4), 271292.
Prensky, M. (2007). How to teach with technology: Keeping both teachers and students
comfortable in an era of exponential change. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 2(4),
4046.
Preston, J. P, Moffatt, L., Wiebe, S., McAuley, A., Campbell, B., & Gabriel, M. (2015). The use
of technology in Prince Edward Island (Canada) high schools: Perceptions of school
leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 9891005.
Ramaley, J., & Zia, L. (2005). The real versus the possible: Closing the gaps in engagement
and learning. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds), Educating the Net generation,
(pp 8.18.21). Boulder, CO: Educause.
Reid, C. (2014). Exceptional students, exceptional technology. The Morning Watch, 42(1-2), 1
2.
Rolfe, A., & Cheek, B. (2012). Learning styles. InnovAiT, 5(3), 176181.
Serow, P., & Callingham, R. (2011). Levels of use of interactive whiteboard technology in the
primary mathematics classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 161173.
Sicilia, C. (2005). The challenges and benefits to teachers` practices in constructivist learning
environments supported by technology (Master's thesis). McGill University, Montreal.
Simkins, M., & Schultz, R. (2010). Using web 2.0 tools at school. Association of California
Schools Administrators, 39(3), 1238.
Slay, H., Siebrger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty
or just lipstick? Computers & Education, 51(3), 13211341.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S, Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boom or
bandwagon? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
21(2), 91101
Starkmann, N. (2006). The wonders of interactive whiteboards. THE Journal (Technological
Horizons in Education), 33(10), 36.
Statistics Canada. (2013). Census of Canada: Canadian internet use survey, 2012. Ottawa, ON.:
Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/dailyquotidien/131126/dq131126d-eng.htm

Swan, P., & Marshall, L. (2010). Revisiting mathematics manipulative materials. Australian
Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 1117.
Swan, K., Schenker, J., Kratcoski, A., & van t Hooft, M. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and
student achievement. In M. Thomas & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for
education and training: Emerging technologies and applications (pp. 131-143). Hershey,
PA:IGI Global.
Thomas, M., & Schmid, E. C. (2010). Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research
and practice. Hersey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Tienken, C. H., & Wilson, M. J. (2007). The impact of computer assisted instruction on seventhgrade student mathematics achievement. Planning and Changing, 38(3/4), 181190.
Thoonen, E. E. J, Sleegers, P. J. C, Peetsma, T. T. D, & Oort, F. J. (2011). Can teachers motivate
students to learn? Educational Studies, 37(3), 345360.
.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). This issue: Differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3),
183184.
Villano, M. (2006). Picture this! A spate of new multimedia tools is putting a whole new face on
the learning process. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 33(16), 16.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: knowledge and research needs in student
engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 137143.
Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing
evidence of equity, access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1),
179225.
White, E. L. (2013). Technology based literacy approach for English language learners. In J.
Whittinghm, S. Huffman, W. Rickman, C. Wiedmaier (Eds) Technological Tools for the
Literacy Classroom, (pp. 263353), Hersey, PA:Information Science Reference.
Wiesman, J. (2012). Student motivation and the alignment of teacher beliefs, The Clearing
House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(3), 102108.
William, J., & Chinn, S. (2009). Using web 2.0 to support the active learning experience.
Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165174.
Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of selfregulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189205.

Yelland, N. (2001). Teaching and learning with information and communication technologies
(ICT) for numeracy in the early childhood and primary years of schooling. Canberra,
Australia: Department of Education, Training, and Youth Affairs.