Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ag
e
(yr
s)
317
Items
+
factor
s
80
items
6
factors
Validity
CRS-r
SNAP
IV
511
90
items
2
factors
Lacks published
psychometric data
Strengths and
Weaknesses of ADHD
Symptoms
and Normal Behavior
SWAN
511
26
items
3
factors
Lacks published
psychometric
data
SKAMP
712
Limited psychometric
data
Vanderbilt ADHD
Teacher Rating Scale
and
Vanderbilt ADHD
Parent Rating Scale
Brown AttentionDeficit Disorder Scales
for Children
and Adolescents
VADTRS
VADPRS
612
13
items
2
factors
43
items
6
factors
BADDS
318
40-50
items
Good psychometric
data but few published
studies
ADHD
RS-IV
518
18
items
2
factors
ADHD Symptoms
Rating Scale
ADHD
SRS
Attention Deficit
Disorder Evaluation
Scale
ADDES
2
Conner
s3
418
Good published
psychometrics
Criterion validity tested
Reliabilty
Sensiti
vity
Specific
ity
Cost
Comorbid
items
Ease of use
Time
(mins
)
Application
P92%
T78%
A81%
P 94%
T91%
A84%
233.60
(Kit)
Yes
20-30
Multiple
Published
Adolescent
form
MAJOR
Circular
Proof
Nil
Nil
Free
Yes but
poor
support
On internet
Website scoring
20-30
Multiple
Published
Not
assessed
Nil
Nil
Free
No
Few published
IR+IC Nil
TR good
N Nil
Not
assessed
Nil
Nil
No
Treatment
limited
IR poor
IC(T) good
IC(P) exc
TR Nil
N limited
IR low-mod
IC good-exc for P,T+A
TR mod-good
N strat by age +sex
Not
assessed
Yes
10-15
Few
published
MINOR
Screening
bias
Low
Good
201
(Kit)
Good published
psychometric data
Criterion validity tested
IR low
IC(P) good
IC(T) good
TR (P) good
TR (T) good
N good + strat by age
+sex
MINOR
Screening
Sample+
Informant
bias
P84%
T63-72%
P49%
T86%
$45
56
items
2
factors
IR poor
IC (P) exc
TR (T) exc
Limited N small US pop
strat by age +sex (only
2 age grps)
Not
assessed
Nil
Nil
50
items
2
factors
IR (P+T)good
IC (P+T)exc
TR(P+T)exc
N strat by age +sex
No major or
minor
Nil
Nil
6110
Good psychometric
18
items
data from manual
P/T
Lacks published data
8ADHD Assessment Tools Table Used to help inform pilot choices
18
SR
IR poor low
IC good
TR poor-good
N US/Can
Strat by age +sex
IR poor
IC good exc
TR Nil
N limited (hispanic)
no strat
Nil
N Nil
Study
Flaws
(Snyder
2006)
MAJOR
Limited Gen
Circular
proof
IR P good, T mod/good
IC Pgood/exc, Texc, SR
good
TR Pgood/exc, Tgood,
SRgood
N strat age /sex/race
Free
Discrim. Val.
Long scale
P 77% T 75%
SR 72%
Im.val
Long
$635.95
(Kit)
Lacks published
clinical
applications
Spanish version
Easy scoring
Clinician administered instrument
available
5-10
Multiple
Published
Validity less in
Asian+
Africanamerica
n population
Spanish version
Computer scoring
15-20
Few published
Mainly research
No
Spanish version
Computer scoring
Confusing- lower scores for
greater pathology
10-15
Multiple
clinical
Yes
Spanish version
Quikscore paper + online
Computer package
20
Lacks published
data
N = Normative data; IR= interrater reliability; IC = internal consistency; TR = test retest reliability; P= parent; T = teacher; A = adolescent; strat = stratified;
Poor=<0.3; Low=0.3-0.5; Mod=0.5-0.7; Good=0.7-0.9; Exc=>0.9.