Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NAME OF SEMINAR
GENDER, POLITICS AND FEMINISM
TITLE OF ESSAY
DEALING WITH CIRCULARITY IN FEMINIST
THOUGHT
N OF WORDS
1985
without
requiring
that
all
women
have
common
inside
these
collectives
are
exchangeable
and
are
product
of
human
action,
individuals
experience
themselves (and others) powerless to alter this material milieu. One can
say that milieu is lived or experienced with a certain sense of alienation.
I find this, in particular, very relevant for thinking the gender system.
One of the counter arguments that can be made to the idea of
thinking men and women in terms of equality and that the differences
among them are merely cultural is taking culture for granted. Culture,
as complex network of meanings, rituals, values, relations of power, etc.
even though is a result of how individuals, collectives and groups relate
to their environment, is actually experienced as something external to
them. Probably this is why its not just a matter of automatically doing
things different in order to achieve the desired change; since the
infrastructure in which we freely operate is not longer ours, we are much
more alienated to it that what we can actually notice.
Gender, as a series, can be then understood as a matrix of
possibilities and impossibilities for the advent of subjectivity. In womens
case with more impossibilities than possibilities. I find here an interesting
link to how Butler develops and understands the notion of gender. As
Foucault, Butler relates power with subjectivity and reminds us that, we,
as subjects under the eaves of certain juridical systems become
between
the
subject
and
the
Ego
(I).
In
this
way,
auto-reflective
attitude
because
there
is
the
risk
of
undermining and forgetting the power and positive effects of milieu and
structures of power in which we are placed. Then, without overlooking
the latter, we can begin to think and, even more important, legitimate
the different and singular positions women can and do adopt. In Youngs
words the practico-inert structures that generate the milieu of
gendered serialized existence both enable and constrain action, but they
do not determine or define it (Young, 1994, pp. 730). Thereby it is
possible to construct a position as women that interpellates us as
subjects, questions us internally and which we hold responsible from.
With a similar purpose Butler brings up the idea of displacement as a
way of introducing singularity and novelty into representations. In her
words to operate within the matrix of power is not the same as to
replicate uncritically relations of domination. It offers the possibility of a
repetition of the law which is not its consolidation, but its displacement
(Butler, 1999, pp. 40).
Despite of agreeing with these subjective resistances in my
opinion they are not always guaranteed and they cannot be easily
demanded. Hence I find it important to interrogate and think about the
conditions of possibility so that one can take ownership of the inherited.
What has to happen, both, in the verge of the subject and its
environment for the latter to be possible? Considering and promoting
this conditions of possibility is essential in the proliferation of wider and
more plural ways of representating women and gender.