Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peter Murtagh
Denis O Brien: The businessman is suing Red Flag over a dossier of material
about him, whch he asserts is defamatory. Photograph: David Sleator
Handling material
Denies conspiracy
There has been quite a bit of judgemental (if you'll excuse the pun) sniffling in certain
quarters over comments made by High Court Judge Colm Mac Eochaidh last week.
PR dealt a blow
Sen McCrthaigh
Last updated at 12:01AM, December 22 2015
http://www.irishexaminer.
com/ireland/staff-told-tohand-over-devices-inobrien-case-362755.html
Denis O'Brien's lawyers
say 'clear evidence' of
campaign against him
Denis O'Brien
fails in bid to
have identity of
Red Flag's client
revealed
Dec. 22, 2015 07:23
be no defamation.
He also found that Mr O'Brien had not proved
that harm had been done to him.
He also found that Mr O'Brien had not proved
that the motivation of the unnamed person
was to do harm to him.
Mr Justice Mac Eochaidh also said that Mr
O'Brien's lawyers had argued that the duty of
confidentiality owed by Red Flag to its clients
should be outweighed by the interest in
obtaining evidence of wrongdoing.
The judge said Mr O'Brien knew full well how
important confidentiality was.
He said Mr O'Brien had taken a case in 2013
against the Sunday Times in which he argued
that irreversible harm would be caused to
him if certain financial details were
published.
The judge said Mr O'Brien would have had to
have had a very strong case indeed, almost
to the point of certainty, that wrongdoing had
been committed against him, if he wanted
the court to make orders that would have
caused irreversible damage to the
defendants.
Lawyers for Red Flag said they would be
seeking their costs.
A full hearing of Mr O'Brien's case against
Red Flag has yet to take place, but Mr Justice
Mac Eochaidh said there was no urgency to
the case.
He said if the people alleged to be conspiring
https://www.rte.ie/news/
2015/1221/755495-deniso-brien/
High Court refuses to
grant Denis O'Brien
orders naming Red Flag's
client
Aodhan O'Faolain
PUBLISHED
13/12/2016
Peter Murtagh
by unlawful means.
In the event, he lost in eight of the nine categories.
Red Flag does not have to disclose the identity of their
client, the person on whose behalf a dossier of
newspaper cuttings on OBrien, plus some assessments
of him and his businesses, was assembled by the PR
company.
Furthermore, the judge ruled that OBrien had failed to
prove the dossier had been published and therefore he
could not prove that he had been defamed.
The one category in which the judge found in OBriens
favour, Category G, relates to communications between
Red Flag and their client on the dossier and any other
subject.
However, the R word with which OBrien has become
so associated in the public consciousness raised its
head once again.
Denis OBrien fails to get orders identifying Red Flag client
.
.
Marching orders
Very surprising
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irishnews/denis-o-brien-suffers-a-serious-setback-in-redflag-battle-1.2904474
Denis O'Brien
intends to appeal
High Court
disclosure ruling
Updated / Dec. 13, 2016
of 'fishing' expedition
Tim Healy
PUBLISHED
14/07/2016
1
Denis O'Brien Photo: Bloomberg
http://www.independent.ie/irishnews/courts/red-flag-accuses-obrien-offishing-expedition-34882929.html
Peter Murtagh
Envelope on desk
The investigator
Litigation focus
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/the-denis-obrien-dossier-what-happened-to-the-usbmemory-stick-1.2731837