Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dania Bilal
School of Information Sciences, The University of Tennessee, 804 Volunteer Blvd., Knoxville, TN 37996.
E-mail: dania@utk.edu
Introduction
A recent survey by the U.S. Department of Education
shows that 98% of all public schools in the U.S. have
Internet access. The penetration of the Internet in schools
has increased from 78% in 1998 to 95% in 2000 (NUA,
2001). The number of children and young adults on-line has
grown from 8 million in 1997 to 25 million in 2000. NUA
estimates that by 2005 more children will go on-line at
school than at home.
Received March 27, 2002; revised May 17, 2002; accepted May 17,
2002
2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online 19 September 2002 in
Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/asi.10145
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 53(13):1170 1183, 2002
Taxonomy of Tasks
The literature does not clearly distinguish between fully
assigned, semiassigned, and fully self-generated. A task is
an essential factor in the information seeking process. Research has shown that the type of task a user is given
influences the users information seeking, information use,
and success (Bilal, 2000, 2001; Borgman et al., 1995; Bystrom & Jarvelin, 1995; Dimitrof & Wolfram, 1995; Hirsh,
1997; Marchionini, 1989, 1995; Qui, 1994; Schacter,
Chung, & Dorr, 1998; Solomon, 1993, 1994; Vakkari,
1999). As Figure 1 shows, tasks vary by type (i.e., openended vs. closed), nature (complex vs. simple), and the way
they are administered (i.e., fully assigned, semiassigned,
fully self-generated). Typically, open-ended tasks (also
known as research oriented) are complex in nature. They
have ill-structured problems, where the information required for accomplishment cannot be determined in advance
(Bystrom & Jarvelin, 1995; Vakkari, 1999). Typically,
closed tasks (also known as fact finding) are simple, well
defined, and have structured problems. They can be routine
information processing tasks with elements that are predetermined (the user knows them). The complexity or simplicity of a task may depend on its formulation and characteristics (e.g., cognitive and skill requirements, number of
existing facets or elements).
FIG. 1.
Taxonomy of tasks.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1171
1172
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1173
1174
Method
This study employed both quantitative and qualitative
inquiry methods. Through the quantitative method, data
about childrens Web moves were captured using the Lotus
ScreenCam software package. Through the qualitative
method, childrens task generation and data about task preference were captured using individual interviews that took
place at the conclusion of the research experiment.
The Setting
The study took place at a Middle School (named Middle
School for confidentiality purposes) located in East Tennessee. At the time of the research experiment, the School
library had two computer stations with an Internet connection. For purposes of the study, three computers were added,
networked, and connected to the Internet to accommodate
use of five computers simultaneously. Lotus ScreenCam
version 2.0 was installed on each computer to capture childrens Web activities. Software and hardware were pretested to ensure proper operation. Yahooligans! was set up
as the default home page in the Netscape browser.
Population and Sample
The population for this study consisted of students in
three science classes (90 students) taught by one science
teacher. Due to the Schools Internet Use Policy, childrens
parental consent to use the Internet was sought. Out of 90
invitations the teacher sent to the parents, 30 consent forms
were received. Of these, 25 children were willing to take
part in this project. Three were involved in pilot testing,
leaving 22 children who participated in the present study.
The children who participated in this study were the same as
those who took part in the previous two studies (Bilal, 2000,
2001).
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
the project to the children. As they volunteered to participate, children were escorted five at a time to the School
library and instructed to sign a consent form. After the task
was explained to them, they were asked to transcribe the
topic they would like to pursue in Yahooligans! on the work
sheet that was given to them.
Children were instructed to (a) use the work sheet to
transcribe their topics; (b) perform the task in Yahooligans!
only, (c) limit search time to 45 minutes, (d) highlight the
information that met their need using the computer mouse,
(e) print the information found, (f) highlight the relevant
information on the printout using a marker, and (g) announce the completion of the task to the researcher and/or
the school librarian. When a child did not locate information
on a topic, the child was allowed to modify the topic.
Children were encouraged to ask questions as needed. When
technical problems occurred, children were given additional
time to complete their tasks. Upon completion, each childs
Web session was saved on the local computer used. All Web
sessions were transferred electronically to the researchers
computer station. Each session was replayed, analyzed, and
transcribed by both the researcher and a trained research
assistant.
Limitations of the Study
This study involved 22 children aged 12 and 13 years
old. However, the results of this study are based on 15
usable Web sessions that replayed fully. The children who
participated in this study were selected from three seventhgrade science classes in one Middle School located in East
Tennessee; therefore, they may not represent all middle
school students in Tennessee, nor may they represent the
general population of seventh-grade science students.
The fact that the data presented in this study were collected in 1998, the data reflect the participants cognitive
and physical behaviors in using the Yahooligans! search
engine at that time. It is possible that these participants
behaviors have changed since then.
At the time of this study, Yahooligans! was the only Web
search engine designed for children ages 712. Despite this
fact, use of only one search engine to examine childrens
information-seeking behavior may not represent an in depth
view of childrens behavior in using Web search engines.
Another limitation concerns lack of concurrent verbalization during use of Yahooligans! The fact that exit interviews took place at the end of the research experiment
rather than immediately after children completed their tasks
may impact the reliability of the responses due to recall.
Results
The results of this study are reported within the context
of the four research questions posed. Due to data loss, the
results are based on 15 usable Web sessions that replayed
fully. Due to the small sample size (15), descriptive statistics were employed to describe trends in the data. The
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1175
1176
Searching
Thirteen out of 15 children (87%) began their initial
moves by performing keyword searches using single and
two terms in their search statements. Most of these searches
included broad terms that children extracted from their
initial rather than mediated topics. The child who selected
the topic about large oil reserves, for example, entered
oil, in the initial move and oil reserve in the subsequent
move. Another child who needed information about the
name of the coach of the Atlanta Braves typed baseball
instead of Atlanta Braves.
Two children committed misspelling errors, one misspelled veterinarians as veternarians and another misspelled psychology as phsychology, and psychologists as physychologits. The first child modified the
search by using synonyms (e.g., pet doctors, dog doctors),
but found no matches. The child switched to the new topic
horses. Apparently, the child was unaware of the error
he/she committed. The fact that Yahooligans! did not have
a spell-checking technique to alert the child about the error
contributed to the breakdown the child experienced. Although the child found three categories and 33 sites under
horses, the child did not select any information to view.
The second child failed in his/her quest and transcribed on
his/her sheet that he/she did not find any information about
the topic.
Childrens search moves varied by task. As shown in
Table 1, they performed more searches on the fully selfgenerated task (mean ! 5.05) than the research-oriented
task (mean ! 3.07). The number of searches on the former
is lower than that on the fact-based task (mean ! 6.7).
Thirteen percent submitted natural language on the fully
self-generated task, whereas 8% performed this type of
searching on the research-oriented task and 35% did so on
the fact-based task. Most searches on the fully self-generated tasks had two concrete concepts, whereas most
searches on both the research-oriented and fact-based tasks
contained single concrete concepts. No child used Boolean
operators, indicating childrens unfamiliarity with this type
of searching.
Search moves also varied by success levels on the three
tasks (Fig. 2). Successful children made fewer keyword
searches on the three tasks. Their mean score of search
moves was 5.5 on the fully self-generated task, 2.4 on the
research-oriented task, and 3.49 on the fact-based task.
Unsuccessful childrens score on these tasks had a mean of
4.78, 8, and 10, respectively.
Browsing
Children browsed much more than searched by keyword
to find information about their topics. They activated 117
hyperlinks, of which 93 were appropriate to the information
sought (appropriateness ratio ! 79%). The number of hyperlinks they browsed varied by success levels (Fig. 2).
Successful children activated 68 hyperlinks (mean ! 7.5),
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
TABLE 1.
Variable
Research-oriented task
(n ! 13)
Fact-based task
(n ! 14)
73%
69%
50%
M ! 5.05a
13%
13%
M ! 12.26
M ! 1.93
M ! 7.4
M ! 14.35 minutes
33%
M ! 78
47%
M ! 3.07a
8%
2%
M ! 4.15
M ! 1.54
M ! 6.07
M ! 10.42 minutes
23%
M ! 41
20%
M ! 6.7a
35%
2%
M ! 8.4
M ! 5.1
M ! 12.2
M ! 15.78 minutes
64%
M ! 49
20%
Success
Search moves
Keyword
Natural language
Misspelling
Browsing moves
Looping moves
Backtracking
Time
Exploratory moves
Web moves
Task preference
a
M!Mean score.
FIG. 2.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1177
1178
Backtracking varied by task (Table 1). Children backtracked a little more on the fully self-generated task than
they did on the research-oriented task (mean ! 7.4 vs. 6.07,
respectively), but did so much more on the fact-finding task
(mean ! 12.2). Backtracking also varied by success levels
on the three tasks (Fig. 2). Successful children backtracked
less often on fully self-generated task (mean ! 7), the
research-oriented task (mean ! 4.7) and the fact-finding
task (mean ! 5.8) than did unsuccessful children (means of
8, 9.25, and 6.4, respectively).
Although childrens frequent backtracking may be typical of user behavior on the Web (Tauscher & Greenberg,
1997), activation of shortcuts, such as the History list and
Go list may be more efficient. Lack of use of these shortcuts
by the children in this study indicates their unfamiliarity
with these features.
Looping
Search looping refers to the re-activation of previously
executed searches. On the fully self-generated task, children
looped an average of one search (mean ! 1). Search looping
varied by success rate. Successful children looped five times
(mean ! 0.56), whereas unsuccessful children looped 10
times (mean ! 1.67) (Fig. 2).
Hyperlink looping means the reactivation of previously
visited hyperlinks. Children looped an average of one and a
half hyperlinks (mean ! 1.5). Like search looping, hyperlink looping varied by success levels. Successful children
looped 8 hyperlinks (mean ! 0.89), whereas unsuccessful
ones looped 15 hyperlinks (mean ! 2.5).
Looping varied by task (Table 1). Children looped an
equivalent number of hyperlinks on the fully self-generated
task and the research-oriented task (mean ! 1.93 vs.1.54,
respectively). However, they looped fewer hyperlinks on
the former task compared to the fact-based task (mean
! 1.93 vs. 5.1, respectively).
Search and hyperlink looping also varied by success
levels on the three tasks (Fig. 2). Successful children looped
searches and hyperlinks much less often on the three tasks
than did unsuccessful ones. Successful childrens mean
average of looping on the fully self-generated task was 0.88,
0.2 on the research-oriented task, and 2.2 on the fact-finding
task. Unsuccessful childrens mean average of looping was
3.5, 3.75, and 8, respectively.
Web Moves
The number of Web moves children made to complete
the fully self-generated tasks ranged from 12 to 110. Children made a total of 1,162 moves (mean ! 77). Web moves
are those that include all activities children performed to
complete the task (e.g., hyperlink activation, backtracking,
looping, exploratory move). The number of Web moves
varied by task (Table 1). Children made the highest number
of Web moves on the fully self-generated tasks (mean
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
To obtain a holistic view of childrens information seeking behavior, the research elicited their affective state in
terms of task preference at the conclusion of the research
experiment. Children were interviewed individually and
asked about the task they preferred the most and the reasons
for their preference. The majority of the children (47%)
preferred the fully self-generated task, 20% liked the research task, another 20% mentioned the fact-finding task,
and 13% were unsure. Only four children (27%) articulated
reasons for their task preference. One child preferred the
fully self-generated task because he/she was able to locate
the information sought. Another who favored the same task
mentioned the challenge that use of Yahooligans! provided him/her. He/she commented: . . . because I wanted to
figure out for myself that I can use [Yahooligans] and use it
well. One child preferred the fact-finding task and another
favored the research task for the same reason: ability to
locate the information sought. Satisfaction with the search
results was the driving force behind childrens task preference rather the task in itself. This finding is inconclusive,
however, because only 27% gave reasons for their task
preference, suggesting the need for further research in this
area of study.
Discussion
This study reported the findings of a research project that
examined the information seeking behavior and success of
seventh-grade science children in using Yahooligans! to
find information for a fully self-generated task. It compared
childrens behavior and success on this task to the behavior
and success they exhibited on the two fully assigned tasks
(research-oriented and fact-based) that they had performed
in the previous studies (Bilal, 2000, 2001). Children were
more successful on the fully self-generated task than on the
two assigned tasks. In addition, their information-seeking
behavior varied by task and by success levels. The findings
are discussed within the context of the four research questions posed.
Success
Most children (73%) found the information they sought
for their fully self-generated task. They were more successful on this task compared to research-oriented task (69%)
and the fact-finding task (50%). Childrens higher success
rate on the fully self-generated task was due to these factors:
first, they selected topics they were familiar with and had
interest in. Although 67% of the topics children chose were
research-oriented, they were simple; that is, they did not
contain many facets and were not complex in nature. Second, children were given a choice to modify their topics or
select new aspects of the topics if they did not locate
information of interest or did not find relevant information.
In cases when children did not find information on one of
the topics, they were able to do so on the second one. Third,
67% of the children were able to formulate a focus during
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1179
1180
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
Task Preference
Most children (47%) preferred the fully self-generated
task to the two assigned tasks they had performed in the
previous studies (Bilal, 2000, 2001). The fact that childrens
satisfaction with the results was more important to them
than choosing their own topics is not surprising. Prior research of children and adults use of the Web revealed that
user satisfaction with search results provided them with a
sense of achievement (Bilal & Kirby, 2001; Kuhlthau,
1993). Although only 27% articulated reasons for their
preference of the fully self-generated tasks in the present
study, this finding should be used as a base for further
research in this area of study.
In sum, the findings of this study revealed these important characteristics about childrens information seeking
behavior and success in finding information in Yahooligans!
for a fully self-generated task.
(1) Children were more successful when they browsed than
when they searched by keyword.
(2) Children generated topics that were research-oriented
and broad in nature. Sixty-seven percent were able to
formulate a focus and select a specific aspect of interest
during topic mediation, while 33% remained undecided
about the aspect to choose.
(3) Children who searched under their initial broad topics
remained undecided about the information to select
from the results they retrieved.
(4) Most children opted to search under broader terms they
extracted from their initial topics rather than the more
specific terms included in their mediated topics.
(5) Thirteen percent used natural language queries, and
another 13% misspelled terms repeatedly.
(6) Thirty-three percent made exploratory moves in the
Netscape browser to locate the information they needed.
No child used the Help features in Yahooligans! or the
browser.
(7) Children backtracked and looped searches and hyperlinks, but not as often as they did for the two assigned
tasks they had performed in the previous studies.
(8) Children need adequate training in using Web search
engines, in navigating in a Web browsers space, as
well as in negotiating information problems and formulating a clear focus about topics of interest.
(9) Overall, children had less difficulty with the fully selfgenerated task than with the two assigned tasks.
Conclusions
The fact that children were more successful in finding
information for the fully self-generated task and had less
difficulty with it compared to the two fully assigned tasks
should not entirely confirm that fully self-generated tasks
are better suited for Web use than fully assigned tasks. As
mentioned earlier, few children, including successful ones,
experienced uncertainty and had decision-making problems
about the information to select from the results they retrieved about their topics of interest. Thus, childrens success should not be judged solely on finding the desired
information. The process children adopt in seeking information, the meaning or sense making they derive from
the information they find, the way they use the information
are important factors in evaluating the information-seeking
process.
When children are given a choice to generate their own
tasks fully, they should be guided and supported affectively
from the time they initiate their topics to the time they
complete them. Most children chose topics that were broad
in nature and, therefore, necessitated mediation to identify
the true information need. Topic mediation is essential to
assist children in formulating a clear focus to pursue. In
addition, children should be trained in identifying their
information need so that they develop a focus and become
certain about aspects of topics to pursue. As children use of
the Web increases at schools and homes, they need to
acquire an adequate level of knowledge of the Information
Search Process (ISP) described by Kuhlthau (1993), for
example, to become more skilled in initiating and completing tasks successfully. Information seeking skills are vital
for these children especially as they use the Web outside
class context where mediation is not provided.
Children browsed more than searched by keyword on the
three tasks. The breakdowns children experienced with
keyword searching was mainly due to Yahooligans! poor
structure of keyword searching. Although Yahooligans! is
designed for children ages 712, it does not support their
information seeking effectively. This is because Yahooligans! is considered a directory rather than a search engine.
However, placing the Search box above the subject hierarchies in the search interface encourages keyword searching
and gives it a priority to browsing. The fact that the engine
lacks a spell-checking technique, has inadequate guidance
under its Help file, and does not provide a corrective feedback method, make its use difficult not only by children, but
also by adults (Bilal & Kirby, 2002). System designers
should reevaluate this engine to support childrens information seeking.
The need for Web training should not be underestimated.
Information professionals should capitalize on childrens
motivation in using the Web by developing formal Web
training programs that incorporate use of models of the
information-seeking process, such as the Big6 Skills (Eisenberg & Berkowitz, 1990). The affective aspect of information seeking should be incorporated into teaching informa-
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1181
APPENDIX 1.
1182
for this study. Thanks are also extended to the children and
the school librarian. The cooperation and support of the
School Principal and Assistant Principal are highly appreciated. Thanks to Peiling Wang, Bill Robinson, and Doug
Raber, Associate Professors, School of Information Sciences at
The University of Tennessee-Knoxville, for their comments and suggestions.
References
Belkin, N.J., Brooks, H.M., & Oddy, R.N. (1982). ASK for information
retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 6171.
Bilal, D. (1998). Childrens search processes in using World Wide Web
search engines: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the 61st ASIS
Annual Meeting, 35, October 24 29, 1998, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 4553).
Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
Bilal, D. (1999). Web search engines for children: A comparative study and
performance evaluation of Yahooligans!, Ask Jeeves for Kids, and
Super Snooper. Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting,
October 31Nov. 4, 1999. Washington, DC (pp. 70 83). Medford, NJ:
Information Today, Inc.
Bilal, D. (2000). Childrens use of the Yahooligans! search engine. I.
Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646
665.
Bilal, D. (2001). Childrens use of the Yahooligans! search engine. II.
Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118
136.
Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2001). Factors influencing childrens and adults
information seeking on the Web: Results of two studies. Proceedings of
the 64th ASIST Annual Meeting, November 4 8, 2001, Washington,
DC (pp. 126 140). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information
seeking on the Web: Children and adults as Web users. Information
Processing & Management, 38(5), 649 670.
Bjorklund, D.F. (2000). Childrens thinking: Developmental function and
individual differences. Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
Borgman, C.L., et. al. (1995). Childrens searching behavior on browsing
and keyword searching online catalogs: The Science Library Catalog
project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(9),
663 684.
Broch, E. (2000). Childrens search engines from an information search
process perspective. School Library Media Research. http://www.
als.org/aasl/SLMR/childrens_main.html. Accessed on November 20,
2001.
Bystrom, K, & Jarvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information
seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 191
213.
Catledge, L.D., & Pitkow, J.E. (1995). Characterizing browsing strategies in
the World Wide Web. Available: http://www.igd.fhg.de/www/www95/
proceedings/ papers/80/userpatterns/UserPatterns.Paper4.formatted.
html. Accessed on September 8,1998.
Dervin, B. (1983). Information as a user construct: The relevance of
perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In S.A.
Ward, & L.A. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications
for synthesis and Interpretation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University
Press.
Dimitrof, A., & Wolfram, Z. (1995). Searcher response in a hypertextbased bibliographic information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 2236.
Eisenberg, M.B., & Berkowitz, R.E. (1990). Information problem-solving:
The big six skills approach to library and information skills instruction.
Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Garland, K. (1995). The information search process: A study of elements
associated with meaningful research tasks. School Libraries Worldwide,
1(1), 4153.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
Oliver, R., & Oliver, H. (1997). Using context to promote learning from
information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 519 526.
Pew Research Center. (2001). The Internet and education: Findings of
the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.
pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report!39. Accessed on January 11,
2002.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York:
Basic Books.
Pitts, J.M. (1995). Personal understandings and mental models of information: A qualitative study of factors associated with the information
seeking and use of adolescents. School Library Media Quarterly, 23(3),
163170.
Qiu, L. (1994). Frequency distributions of hypertext path patterns: A
pragmatic approach. Information Processing & Management, 30(1),
131140.
Schacter, J., Chung, G.K.W.K., & Dorr. (1998). Childrens Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840 849.
Siegler, R.S. (1998). Childrens thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
Small, R.V. (1999). An exploration of motivational strategies used by
library media specialists during library and information skills instruction. School Library Media Research [Online]. http://www.ala.org/aasl/
SLMR/motive.html. Accessed on May 1, 2000.
Solomon, P. (1993). Childrens information retrieval behavior: A case
analysis of an OPAC. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science, 44(5), 245264.
Solomon, P. (1994). Children, technology, and instruction: A case study of
elementary school children using an online public access catalog
(OPAC). School Library Media Quarterly, 23(1), 4353.
Tausher, L., & Greenberg, S. (1997). How people revisit Web pages:
Empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 97137.
Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management 35, 819 837.
Wallace, R., & Kupperman, J. (1997). On-line search in the science
curriculum: Benefits and possibilities. Paper presented at the AERA,
Chicago. http://mydl.soe.umich.edu/papers/online_search.pdf. Accessed
on January 19, 2002.
Watson, J. (1998). If you dont have it, you cant find it. A close look at
students perceptions of using technology. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 49(11), 1024 1036.
Wang, P., Hawk, W.B., & Tenopir, C. (2000). Users interaction with
World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic
approach. Information Processing & Management, 36, 229 251.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYNovember 2002
1183