Professional Documents
Culture Documents
upload
personSIGN IN
by Javeed A. Munshi
mSf!
This publication is intended SOLELY for use by PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL who are competent to evaluate
the significance and limitations of the information provided herein, and who will accept total responsibility for
the application of this information. The Portland Cement
Association DISCLAIMS any and all RESPONSIBILITY
and LIABILITY for the accuracy of and the application of
the information contained in this publication to the full
extent permitted by law.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. General 3
5. Design of Components 23
6. Detailing .....29
53
Notation
CHAPTER1
Introduction
1.1 GENERAL
BOCA 1996 and SBC 1997 for two reasons: (a) All of these
model codes use strength-level earthquake forces, and (b)
Some of the model codes are based on more recent (post1977) seismic hazard analysis and seismic zoning, which
have not been incorporated in ACI 350.3. Therefore, ACI
350.3-01 in its current form can not be directly used with
these building codes.
This publication bridges the gap between ACI 350.301 and the model codes ind icated above which use strengthlevel earthquake forces. The concepts of ACI 350-01 and
ACI 350.3-01 have been extended for use with the IBC
2000, UBC 1997, BOCA 1996 and SBC 1997 for the design
of liquid-containing structures. An effort has been made to
interpret and extrapolate the concepts and provisions of
ACI 350.3-01 to make them compatible with these codes.
Several challenges were encountered during this process because of incompatibilities and insufficient information pertaining to load combinations involving earthquake
and fluid pressure, response modification factors corresponding to impulsive and convective motion of liquid,
effects of dynamic earth and ground water pressure and
the manner in which they should be combined with other
loads, and last but not least, complexity of structural
response and boundary conditions. Since many of these
issues are complex and currently being researched and
debated, the interpretations given in this publication are
by no means final. ACI Committee 350 has identified some
of these issues to be taken up as future business. This
publication will be updated when either more information
or better interpretations of these issues become available
through the consensus committee efforts.
1.2 SCOPE
deta il ing of concrete 1 iquid-con tain i ng structures for ea rthquake forces according to the model building codes. It
covers rectangular and circular tanks with non-flexible
and flexible wall-to-base slab connections.
Chapter 5 contains the design recommendations for various components of the liquid -containing structure, including foundations, immersed elements and other components subjected to dynamic loads. Procedures for design of
both rectangular and circular tank walls are included.
Chapter 7 illustrates the design and detailing of a rectangular concrete tank located in a region of high seismicity
per the IBC 2000. The base shear is also computed for the
UBC 1997, UBC 1994, BOCA 1996 and SBC 1997 codes.
CHAPTER 2
General
i. Rectangular
3. Flexible Base
Liquid-containing structures essentially fall into two categories of behavior based on their wall- to-footing connection: the non-sliding or the rigid base (Fig. 2-1) and the
flexible base (Fig. 2-2). The non-sliding base typically uses
a fixed or hinged wall-to-footing connection. The flexible
base typically uses a base pad between the wall and the
footing and allows varying degrees and types of movement depending upon whether the wall is anchored,
unanchored contained or unanchored uncontained in the
footing (Fig. 2-2). This type of connection is only used for
circular prestressed tanks. The type of base connection is
likely to influence the seismic response of a liquid-contain-
Seismic Cables
Non-sliding Base Tanks that have a fixed or hinged connection between the walls and the foundation are essentially non-sliding type. Steel reinforcement or keying action
ensures the non-sliding behavior, as shown in Fig. 2-1.
CHAPTER 3
3.1.1 General
Section 1622.2 of IBC 2000 indicates that when calculating the seismic forces, the normal operating contents
should be included for tanks. The seismic weight W should
also include snow and ice loads when these constitute
more than 25% of W.
Section 1617.4.1.
V=CSW
R ~ RT
,, . 0.8.?,/
where,
S DS = thedesignspectralresponseaccelerationatshort
period obtained from Section 1615.1.3.
S os = 2/3S,,_,
S n,=2/3S M1
S .VM = F r S l
V = 0.3 S os WZ
= Q 0.2S, D
Exception: where < 0.15g and S, < O.U4g, the structure shall be designed for Seismic Design Catagory A.
F, = 0 -7CJ r W p
1 . A response spectrum analysis that includes consideration of actual ground motion anticipated at the site and
the inertial effects of the contained liquid.
Note that both the 1BC 2000 (1622.2.5) and the UBC 1997
(1634.4) provisions allow the use of an alternate
design procedure from a nationally approved standard.
The provisions of ACI 350.3 Vh can be used as an alternate
design procedure satisfying the criteria of a nationally
approved standard. Various concepts of ACI 350.3
have been included in Chapter 4. Note that the provisions
of ACT 350.3 are compatible with the UBC 1994 that
involves service-level earthquake forces. The IBC 2000,
UBC! 1997, BOCA 1996 and SBC 1997 use strength-level
earthquake forces.
the building codes do not give specific load combinations that can be directly used for design of liquid-containing structures for earthquake loading. Section 1605.2.2 of
1 BC 2000 indicates that fluid pressure (F) should be added
in the prescribed load combinations in accordance with
Table 3-1 Load Combinations for Building Structures Per IBC 2000
Code
Code
Section
Loads +
Required Strength
Eq. No.
ACI 9.2.1
V = 1.4D + 1.7L
(9-1)
AC1 9.2.2
(9-1)
(9-2)
(9-3)
ACI 9.2.3
(9-1)
IBC 1605.2
(16-5)
IBC 1605.2
(16-6)
ACI 9.2.4
(9-1)
(9-4)
ACI 9.2.5
(9-1)
(F)***
ACI 9.2.7
(9-1)
(9-5)
Shrinkage, Expansion of
Shrin kage-Compensating
Concrete, or Temperature ( T)
(iii) U = 1.4 (D + T)
(9-6)
t D, L, VV. II, T, ami T represent the designated service loads or their corresponding effects
such as moments, shears, axial forces, torsion, etc. Note: E is a
strength-level earthquake force.
** Weight and pressure of soil and water in soil. (Groundwater pressure is to be considered
part of earth pressure with a 1.7 bad factor.)
** Weight and pressure of fluids with well defined densities and controllable maximum
heights
Table 3-2 Comparison of Load Combinations in the 1994 and 1997 UBC for Building Structures
1994 UBC
1997 UBC
Eq. No.
Eq. No.
(9-1)
1.4D + 1.7L
(9-1)
1.4D + 1.7L
(9-2)
(9-2)
1.4 (D + L + E)*
(9-3)
0.9 D + 1.3W
(12-5)
(9-3)
0.9D + 1.3W
0.9D + 1.4E*
0.9 D + 1.43E*
(12-6)
(12-17)
(12-18)
0.9D + 1.0E,,,
p =. reliability/rcdundancy factor
Table 3-3 Load Combinations Specified in BOCA and SBC for Building Structures
Equation
No./Code
BOCA 1996**
Equation
No. /Code
SBC 1997***
(9-1)
AC1 318
1.4D + 1.7L
(9-1)
AC1 318
1.4D + 1.7L
(9-2)
AC1 318
(9-2)
AC1 318
(9-3)
AC1 318
0.9D 1.3W
(9-3)
ACI318
0.9D 1.3W
(5)
ASCE 7
(1)
SBC
(1.1 + 0.5/1,,) D + E C2 (
(6)
ASCE 7
(0.9-0.5A v )D1.0Q r
(2)
SBC
(0.9 - 0.5A U ) DQ ,
(5Y
ASCE 7
(4) 1
SBC
(6) ++
ASCE 7
(3) n
SBC
See 1613.0, 1610.3.7, Sect. 9.2 ofACl 318, and Sect. 2.3.2 of ASCE 7-95.
Used for axial compression in columns supporting discontinuous lateral force resisfm|
r/twejj(s, whete UK/5 -
Used for horizontal prestressed members in buildings assigned to SPC D or where (2R/5)
>1.U.
.4)
U= 1.4 (D + l + F + E)
The IBC 2000, the UBC 1997, the BOCA 1996 and SBC
1997 use the strength-level earthquake force while the UBC
1994 and ACI 318 use the service-level earthquake force.
Note that in the absence of clearly defined load combinations, the load combinations given above are the best
interpretations of what is currently in the building codes as
it applies to liquid -containing structures. The designer
should carefully investigate the load combinations that
apply to his/her situation.
the concrete
1. Flexural Reinforcement
3. Stirrup Reinforcement
3.8 REFERENCES
3-6. Seismic Design of Liquid-Containing Concrete Structures (ACI 350.3-01) and Commentary (ACI 350.3R01), ACI Committee 350, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2001.
CHAPTER 4
4.1 MODELING
PLAN
RECTANGULAR TANK
Undisturbed Oscillating
-f-
_T "max
.w,
\>
rI
ym
m=1m=2
IN RIGID TANKS
Fig. 4-1 Schematic of Rectangular and Circular Tank Fig. 4-3 Vibration Modes
ii
v, = c si ( iv u + W K + W , ) Impulsive
V c = C sc W r Convective
_SmlSml
s ' R RT,
q _ S l>s I < S M I
sc R ~ RT C
08 V
The overturning moment at the base of the tank is determined for the impulsive and the convective components
as follows:
M, = C SI ( VV H h w + W R h R + WA) Impulsive
M c = C sc {W t h ( ) Convective
0.67
+ 0.4
for T < T,
= S as for T 0 <T<T S
S forT > T s
The above equations can be used to determine the response ordinate S al for impulsive motion using T, and S sC
for convective motion using T c . The damping correspond-
1 5S
V, = (VV U + W R + W ; ) Impulsive
R
V r = -^(lV r ) Convective
> 0.8 V r
12
^ ~ ]^( W w + W R + W , ) Impulsive
V, ~^JT~( W " +W K + W t)
V i =nc / (W w + W R + W ; )
.. 0.8ZAC/
+ + W,)
Cl
) Convective
iVvtrvc
c ./
<-
2.5C.I
Convective
5 =C
.5 T
5 , = 2-5C
"T
where
T s = C v / 2.5C
T o = 0.2T s
for T < T
for T > T
15
C i~ Tj 2 '' 3
Impulsive
1.255
C c~ T? n
0.075 R w < C, < 2.75
Convective
M, = ^{W wK + w h R + w i h i ) Impulsive
yir
M r = =^(W c h c ) Convective
Rw
The impulsive and convective components of the baseshear are determined using the spectral values S fll and S ;|C
as follows:
V I =^(W w +W R+ W,)
Impulsive
Convective
The uplift pressure at the base can increase the overturning moments and effect the stability of the tank.
v,=
VIC
^(w w + w K + w,)
Kw
Impulsive
V c =^(W r )
Convective
CJ
V_ Convective
The quantities S (| and S jC are the impulsive and convective spectral accelera tion coefficients w hich correspond
to the impulsive and convective periods T, and T c from the
simplified spectrum (Fig. 4-8). The design spectrum is
given in U BC Fig. 1 6-3. The base shear computed using the
site-specific spectrum is not permitted to be less than 90%
of the value determined using the static force procedure
given under Section 4.4.1.
16
V^C^+Wk+VV,)
K:=C.,(W)
c = < 2.5/1,
" RT, 2n R
SC RT c 2/i ~rT
where A t and A_ are the effective peak acceleration coefficient and the effective peak velocity-related acceleration
coefficient, respectively (see Section 1610.1.3 of BOCA and
Section 1607.1 .5 of SBC)
The values of site coefficient (S) and response modification factor ( R) should be taken from appropriate edition
of the BOCA or SBC codes.
M c = C x (W c h c ) Convective
Impulsive
Convective
Impulsive
Convective
T l= 2n
iW
ig*
4.7 PERIOD
17
Tank Use
Factor /
1.5
1.25
1.0
ll/M'r inline
design earthquake.
Type of Structure
R1
On or
Above
Grade
Buried 01
4.5
4.5
1.0
2.75
4.0
1.0
2.0
2.75
1.0
3.0
1.0
(V
(2)
(3)
R = 4.5 js f/u wwA-imuiw R value permitted to be used for any lujuid-contiww^ concrete
stria tun.
2n
In
T, = TT
W = W w + W R + W,
k =144
(0,
A S E S cos 2 (i
+ 2 Wr '
For anchored
LsSh
flexible tanks
2 G r U r L r
'A J
For unanchored
flexible tanks
where
12 \E C
co,=C L i- 5 ' H, \ p c
ifn,
12r
c L = ioc M
T,
, r 8 nW
144
T C =^0
18
Fig. 4-10 Chart for Obtaining Factor Cfor Computation of Impulsive Period (T,) of a NonSliding Circular
Tank (Adapted from Ref. 3-6)
Pm = Why
T v = lit
f y l dh[
\i 24 gt w E c
4.9 FREEBOARD
roof, wall and the joint between roof and the wall. Note
that tanks with inadequate freeboard will experience uplift pressures on the roof due to liquid sloshing. 1 anks in
seismic zones 3 and 4 and tanks designed for importance
factor greater than 1.0 should either have adequate freeboard d, r . (Fig. 4-2a) or should be designed for the forces
due to restrained sloshing and vertical acceleration effects.
The sloshing height may be computed by using the fol lowing equations which are based on concepts similar to those
given in ACI 350.3.
" m 1.4T C l 2 )
UBC 97 Method
_ C V 1 (M
r 1.4T C UJ
d-
C v l (D
1.47; l 2
UBC 94 Method
max
20
l.2A,.S (L)
_1.2A.S(D3
ACI 350.3 stipulates that in computing the earth pressure, the coefficient of dynamic lateral earth pressure k at
rest should be used unless it is determined that the structure deflects sufficiently to warrant use of active and
passive pressure k a and k p , respectively. The coefficient A: i
varies from 0.4 - 0.6 for cohesionless soils and 0.4 - 0.8 for
cohesive soils ' '. I lie resultant of the seismic component of
the earth pressure can be assumed to act at a height 0.6
times the earth height above base.
Note that the above simplification of the earth pressure effects is based on the assumption that the liquidcontaining structure will not deflect enough to result in
active or passive pressure due to the seismic excitation.
When this is not the case, dynamic active and passive
pressures need to be calculated. References 4-4 and 4-5
give the guidelines for computing the dynamic active and
passive pressures. In situations where detailed active and
passive pressure computations are deemed necessary, the
user should also refer to Okabe (Ref. 4-7) and Mononobe
and Matsuo (Ref. 4-8).
Type of Backfill
A/K
Active
Passive
Dense Sand
0.001
0.01
Medium-dense Sand
0.002
0.02
Loose Sand
0.004
0.04
4.11 REFERENCES
4-7. Okabe, S. (1926), "General Theory of Earth Pressures," Journal Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Vol.
12, No. 1.
Earthquake
21
22
CHAPTER 5
Design of Components
5.1 GENERAL
cIc/
SI SI
P -fnsLw R
* R R RT,
SI SI
Pw
R 1 RT,
SI SI
P <^iv
c R c RT C
C1
v w
pw=
w RT,
CVI
KRjR
Wall Inertia
Roof Inertia
Impulsive
Convective
Wall Inertia
Roof Inertia
CI
p =yw,
' RT, 1
Impulsive
Convective
23
WALL INERTIA
IMPULSIVE PRESSURES
where
0.11C ,/<
C V 1 2.5 CJ
RT, R
0.8 ZNyl C V I
RT,
P. v = Z 1C. tt-
iX W
P K = ZIC. -8-
RX
P. = ZIC, ! L
'X
P- = ZIC
' c R
where
C =- < 2.75
!r2^
'i
Impulsive
Zone 4
_ 1.25S
L c 2*2/3
Convective
Wall Inertia
P W =C;X
P, = C S ,W R
Wall Inertia
Roof Inertia
Roof Inertia
p, =C S ,W J
Impulsive
Pc = C sc W c
Convective
Impulsive
where
1.2Z,S 2.54
Si R7? /3 R
Impulsive
Convective
Convective
24
Direction of
Tank Motion
Trailing Half
Leading Half
p_1w
P=P
1h11
2 Hf
Impulsive
' Ciy 1 C
2 HI
1 y,
Note that convective force is out-of-phase with impulsive force because of the relatively large oscillation period
of the contained liquid with respect to the tank motion.
Therefore, square root of the sum of squares (SRSS) method
should be used to combine the impulsive and convective
forces. The dynamic earth pressure caused by the movement of the tank can be directly added to the impulsive
effects for design purposes.
Intertia
Impulsive
25
2 R.
P,=
- cos 0
nr
Pc
1 6 P Cf
9nr
cost)
N v =^ + N -v )2+N 4
Hoop stress: _ i
N VVy = V 71
26
27
W, = nayb 3
where a = added weight ratio (1.25 for flat two dimensional elements vibrating normal to their axis
(baffles) and 1.0 for cylindrical shapes)
F 0 = C p Au 2
1 for cylinders)
5.4 FOUNDATIONS
Where no vertical or diagonal ties are provided between walls and footing, no tension is permitted due to
uplift from earthquake overturning moment. In such situations, the overturning moment should be balanced bv
weight and width of the structure with appropriate margin of safety.
5.6 REFERENCES
28
CHAPTER 6
Detailing
6.1 GENERAL
6.3 REFERENCE
6-1 Seismic Detailing of Concrete Buildings, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IT 60077, 2000.
29
Low
Moderate
High 1
SPC A, B
SPC C
SPC D, E 1
Seismic Zone 0, 1
Seismic Zone 2
Seismic Zone 3, 4 1
SDC A, B
SDC C
SDC D, E. F 1
ASCE 7-98
NEHRP (1997)
Intermediate
(21.2.1.3)
High
(21.2.1.4)
Frame members
21.10
21.2-21.5
None
21.2, 21.6
None
21.2, 21.7
Foundations
None
21.2, 21.8
- ___J
None
21.2, 21.9
30
Sect. No.
Fig. No.
Reinforcement spacing each way shall not exceed 18 in. (12 in. per ACI 350-01)
21.6.2.1
6-1
21.6.2.2
21.6.2.3
31
Sect. No
IV 14 ' mXj
21.6.4.1
^J^vari es linearly between 3.0 and 2.0 for hjt. between 1.5 and 2.0.
and Tho 9 Wa Shal1 be the larger of the ratios for the entire wall
Nominal shear
21.6.4.2
21.6.4.3
21.6.4.4
21.6.4.5
U-s.irrups having the same size and spacing as, and sSfo the
I .* . . .
> A .if',
CV \Jc
Figure 6-2 Reinforcement Details where Boundary Elements are Not Required
33
34
CHAPTER 7
7.1 INTRODUCTION
( = 3,834 ksi)
Long/short walls
S, = 0.4
S s = 1.0
F =1.1
F v = 1.6
Seismic coefficient R = 2
Importance Factor = 1
|l 8'
21 ' - 6 "
31' -6"
35
7.3.1 Weight
i ms
H. 8
H,
, A , 28.5x18.5x8x70 inc1I .
W, = = 295.3 kips
1,000
w _ 2(20 + 301x10x1.5x150 _ y .
w 1,000
wK=o
bXHl
V, = C SI (W w , + W R + W, ) Impulsive
V c = C sc (W c ) Convective
SI SI
q _ U DS 1 l
3 R RT,
MS a S
h, = 0.37 x 8 = 3.0 ft
/i c = 0.56 x 8 = 4.5 ft
7.3.2 Period
T. = In
' \gK
K=|48 1 It
, (225x5 + 144.7x3) , - ,,
It = = 4.2 ft
(225 + 144.7)
t = 18 in.
t = 3,834 ksi
3834
~48
= 6,290 kips/ft
T -tr 3697
1 , = 271, 1
' V 32.2x6290
0.27 sec
0.42
si 2 2x0.27
SI SI
l< RT
0.73 x 1 _ 042x1 _
2 2x2.8
Use 0.075
v,=c fl (w w +w+w,)
M, =C SI {W w h w +W, i h R + W,h l )
m, = c 5C (wa)
Impulsive
Convective
36
- 579 ft-kips
Impulsive force.
32x22x 2x150
1,000
Overturning
Resisting moment =
731x22
= 8,041 ft-kips
579
Convective force,
L g C bL C 1
Pw
A 0.002
0.109P] 0.039P C
37
P=P
ri
H,
2 HI
At bottom of wall.
p=p
1 INS ' i
[4x8-6x3]- (6x8-12x3)x {
2x8-
= 0.1 09P,
[4x8-6x3|-[(6x8-12x3)x8 g j
P=P
ht=& ' I
2x8 2
= 0.01 55 P
P =P
1 Cy ' r
2 Hr
At bottom of wall,
Cy-0 1 c
_ p [4 x8-6x4.5J- (6x8-12x4.5)x 8 ]
2x8 2 J =0.039P C
p = [4x8-6x4.5]-[(6 x 8 - 12 x 4.5) x 8 g ]
2x8 2
! =0.0859?
2x30x10
84 psf
(Use 4.0)
a8
= 3.75
c 20
- = = 2.50
a8
to height of liquid
J,
71C
= 150
= 88
Deflection coefficient
= 26
= 0.5
= 0.38
= 435
= 348
Deflection coefficient
= 98
= 1.0
= 1.68
E corresponds to the effects of earthquake force computed In Table 7-1. F corresponds to the effects of static
hydrostatic fluid pressure computed in Ref. 5-1.
Vertical direction,
Vertical direction,
Horizontal direction,
38
Loading
Inertia
Impulsive
Convective
SRSS 2
Pressure, q (psf)
ii
[\
17
Uniform
Uniform +
Triangular
Uniform -
Triangular
Top
84
30
0.0
30
34
0.0
34
Bot.
84
30
174
204
34
-18.5
15.5
Height, h (ft)
10
r.
Design Coefficients 1
/W Coeff.
435
435
150
435
150
M y Coeff.
348
348
88
348
88
Shear Coeff.
-Bottom
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
-Side
1.7
1.7
0.4
1.7
0.4
Deflection
98.0
98.0
26.0
98.0
26.0
Coeff.
M dx (ft-kips)
3.65
0.84
1.67
2.51
0.97
-0.18
0.79
6.2
!W dy (ft-kips)
2.92
0.66
0.98
1.64
0.78
-0.11
0.67
4.6
Shear (k)
- Bot.
0.84
0.24
0.70
0.94
0.28
-0.08
0.20
1.8
- Side
1.43
0.41
0.56
0.97
0.48
-0.06
0.42
2.4
Deflection (in.)
0.0061
0.00089
0.0014
0.0023
0.0010
-0.00015
0.0009
0.009
Design coefficients are taken from Kef. 5-1 for different loading patterns and end conditions of
the plates.
Deflection - Deflection coefficient \ pressure x height 1 /!, 000D, where D = E t : '/!2(!-p : ) 1,940,%2.S in -kips, and u = 0.2.
- Note that convective force is out-of-phase with both inertia and impulsive forces. 1 here
fore, square root of the sum of squares (SKSS) method
is used to combine the inertia and impulsive forces with the convective forces.
= 1.28F+ 1.0F
39
t . , 46,008
V t = 1.0 x 69 = 69 kips
V=A cv (a c v f +p J y )
a = 3 for = 0.5
' (18x121
* 1,000
tp
Wall deformation.
7.6 DETAILING
requirements under other load and serviceability conditions. This indicates that this particular tank is likely to
remain nearly elastic or distress free in the event of a
design earthquake.
The requirements of Table 6-3 are satisfied for inplane wall design. The steel provided along with spacing
satisfies Section 21 .6.2. 1 of ACI 318 (Table 6-3). Per Section
21.6.2.3, all continuous reinforcement in structural walls
should be anchored or spliced in accordance with the
provisions of reinforcement in tension (21.5.4).
0.31x2x12
9x18x12
= 0.0038
400
60,000
Flexural stiffness =
3 . 1 3 x 3, 834 x 1.5 x 20 3
10
~ 138,024 kips/in.
L2W w 1.2x10
= 46,008 kips/in.
69
40
C = 0.44N = 0.44
C. = 0.64 = 0.64
V = 0.7C 1W
Base shear,
41
c ' 2.75
V t -=^-(W r ) Convective
Base shear.
V, = ^(W lv +w R + w,)
Impulsive
ZlC c v
c=_ r7 ( ^
Convective
Impulsive
1.25S , T T
- for T, > 1 i
J.2/3 1 5
2I
1.25 S
Convective
r 65
lc
C = = 1.15
2.8
1.0 V
A =0.2
A =0.3
V, = C s) (W w + W N + W,) Impulsive
V c = CJW c ) Convective
k-s/ - RT 2/3 - R
_ 1 - 2 x 0.3 x 1.5 _ q ^
51 ~ _ 3 x 0.27 2/3
25A n _2.5xQ.3_ 0? .
R3
42
_ 1.2 A V S
RT c 2/3
0.09
V , = y V? + l/ 2 = 159.6 kips
Code
1BC 2000
UBC 1997
UBC 1994
ACI 350.3
137.3
140.9
159.6
Note that VC - 149.3 kips and 1 63.3 kips are service level base shears
that are multiplied by a factor of 1.4 when combined using the load
combinations given in Chapter 3 to determine the design force in a
member. The base shears computed for I BC 2000, UBC 1 997 and SBC /
BOCA arestrength level and are multiplied by a factor of 1 .0 in the load
combinations.
43
CHAPTER 8
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Vertical reinforcement
Horizontal reinforcement
Height of liquid = 26 ft
45
S, = 0.4
S =1.0
Seismic coefficient R = 2
Importance factor = 1
(This tank is not a part of
latitude = 41"),
8.3.2 Period
co, = C.
12 'E<_
H, \ Pc
it
r =10C I 1
' lv V I2r
C, = 10x0.143
16
\ 12x45
= 0.25
8.3.1 Weight
_D
90
26'
3.46
W, W c
W = 10,7nl kips
1 4x1,000 f
12 '3,834x1,000
26 \ 4.66
271
T, = = 0.06 sec
1 104.7
Au L
" 4x1,000 f
1,012 kips
Y ( =C s ,(W w +W r +W,)
v c = e sc (w c )
_ -*ns^ <
fl R RT t
= W l-lxl-0 = l.l
S Mi = F v S, = 1.6x0.4 = 0.64
S ds =|ss=0.73
50 ^ 1 ^ = 0.43
Impulsive
Convective
46
' 2 2x0.06
sC R
< SoJ
RT C
073x1 = 0 _ 37 ,
0.43x1
2x6.2
s _ 6S, = 6x0.43 _
tlC T-O -2
T?
6.2-
067
0.067 x 1
V, = y Vp + VC - 2,437 kips
T = Sj ^= 0.59 sec
S
Since T, < T v S = S ns
0.6 T
T
'n
+ 0.4
0.73 x
0.6x0 .06
0.118
+ 0.4
0.51
0.51
V, =C s; (W vv +W K +W ( )
V c = 468 kips
HlH,Hl
= 0.375 x 26 = 9.75 ft
lt c = 0.54 x 26 = 14.0 ft
M,=C sr (WA.+WA+W,/0
M T = v Mf + M- = 33,400 ft-kips
Base slab
ci c ci 0.7x15,734 . , ,, ,,
2,405
47
Overturning
708,030
Distribution of
base shear
Direction of
seismic force
Base tangential
unit shear, q
Since the effect of both D and F are negligible for inplane wall design, required strength is U = 1.0E for
both 1BC and ACI 318 load combinations. Tire shear
stress from hydrostatic forces acts in a radial direction,
and is not added to the in-plane shear of the wall.
V=
o.sc
nr
0.8x2,405
3.14x45
= 13.6 kips/ ft
Use tx = 3 for ,
ct.
<2
+ (0.0156x60,000)|/l,000
= 1.3F+ 1.0E
For determining the out-of-plane momen t d ue to earthquake forces M r , the tank is divided into leading half and
the hailing half portions as shown in Fig. 5-6.
48
0.023 7P C
Wall inertia,
S 1
Roof Inertia,
S/
Impulsive,
Convective,
jrr
10.6x1000
3.14x45
= 75 psf
(uniform)
Jjs_
2 ",
593
2^28 = 10 - ft k / ft
P =P,
2H-
n f 2 P w 2 x 0.034 P,
Jtr jtr
2 x 0.034x1,392x1,000
670 psf
3.14x45
(maximum @0 = 0)
2 x 0.0048 P.
1 op of liquid = L cos0
Jtr
2x0,0048x1,392x1,000
3.14x45
= 80.7 psf
At bottom of wall,
= 0.034P,
P- 2b = 0.0048P,
P -/.
(maximum @0 = 0)
- 16P c, 16x0.0148P r
9jtr 9jtr
16x0.0148x238x1,000
= 44.2 psf
9x3.14x45
(maximum @0 = 0)
^ ,, 16 x 0.0237 P-
(maximum @0 = 0)
2 Hi
At bottom of wall.
4, , = r l - 6 2feJ = 0.0148P
Ihe above pressure needs to be determined at different values of 0 and applied to the leading and the trailing
walls to determi ne the ad ditional hoop stresses and ou t-ofplane moments. These stresses and moments can be more
accurately computed using shell analysis.
49
out-of-plane bending.
_ 0.2 x 2,405
g ~ 240 kips
Assuming this force will act at an approximate resultant height of 10 ft (weighted average of h, and h c ), total
28 * "
50
Note that dynamic earth pressure effects are not included in this example. Reference 4-5 should be consulted
when determining these effects.
8.5 DETAILING
Based on the SI X. D associated with this structure, detailing corresponding to high seismic risk will apply per Table
6-1 (see Chapter 6). Based on this, it is prudent to locate the
splices away from the potential plastic hinge zones. The
Class B splice length should be provided for both No. 6
vertical bars as well as No. 8 and No. 9 horizontal bars per
12.2 of ACI 3-18-99. The required development length of
the No. 6 and No. 7 dowels in the base slab is 18 in.
"U u
Notation
1997)
9807 mm /sec 2 )
h = mean height at which the inertia force of tank
and its contents is assumed to act, ft (m)
ft-lb (kN-m)
53
Ib/ft (kN/m)
7 0 = 0.27>0.2S,/S i;s
= S m /S
54
>
Phone: 847.966.6200
Fax: 847.966.9781
Internet: www.portcement.org
EB219.01