Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9, SEPTEMBER 2013
Fig. 10. The phase differences for the forward and reflected signals for odd mode
excitation. For even mode excitation the directions of the arrows are reversed.
realized gains are 7.4 dBic for LHCP in port 1 and 4.8 dBic for RHCP in
port 2. The difference is most likely due to the loss in the coupling mechanism. The additional length of the phase shifter impacts both RHCP and
LHCP simultaneously and hence does not contribute to this difference.
V. ISOLATION
Isolation between RHCP and LHCP ports is a crucial issue for potential applications. However, due to the use of 90 phase shifter, the principles for achieving good and wideband isolation are different to those
presented in [9]. Fig. 10 illustrates the phase of the signal, which is reflected from the patch. The odd mode is excited, hence 0 phase difference at the input. As the wave travels through the line a 90 phase difference is added by the phase shifter. When the energy is reflected from the
patch (red dashed arrows) the signal travels back and through the phase
shifter for the second time, effectively producing 180 phase shift. As a
result although excitation is in odd mode the reflected wave is in even
mode (and vice versa for the even mode excitation). This shows that the
limiting factor for good isolation is the patch impedance matching and
its bandwidth. This is especially critical because traditional patch antennas are narrowband. The use of bandwidth enhancement techniques
([11], [13]) is therefore strongly recommended for the proposed designs.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
In this communication a new antenna for circular polarization diversity is proposed. Good isolation in the operating band makes the
antenna a suitable candidate for wireless applications. Other applications include polarization sensor antennas. Apart from the 90 phase
shifter (which can be easily realized within a limited footprint) the antenna feed has no wavelength dependent elements, therefore providing
a compact solution. The use of a single CPW to transmit two separated
signals allows a flexible design, especially in small devices where the
space available for RF circuits is constrained.
The use of CPW and a coupling mechanism to generate the odd mode
was used to facilitate measurement with a VNA. In fact almost any line
supporting even/odd modes can be employed and the two modes can
be generated in various ways, for instance directly by a MMIC, as even
and odd modes are often used in microwave circuits.
REFERENCES
[1] P. R. King, T. W. C. Brown, A. Kyrgiazos, and B. G. Evans, Empiricalstochastic LMS-MIMO channel model implementation and validation,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 606614, Feb. 2012.
[2] F. Yang and Y. Rahmat-Samii, A reconfigurable patch antenna using
switchable slots for circular polarization diversity, IEEE Microwave
Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 9698, Mar. 2002.
[3] R.-H. Chen and J.-S. Row, Single-fed microstrip patch antenna with
switchable polarization, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 56, no.
4, pp. 922926, Apr. 2008.
[4] B. Wu and M. Okoniewski, A novel scheme for realizing a microstrip
antenna with switchable circular polarization, in Proc. 6th Eur.
Conf. on Antennas and Propagation, Prague, Czech Rep., 2012, pp.
32783282.
4831
[5] B. A. Centiner, J. Y. Qian, G. P. Li, and F. De Flaviis, A reconfigurable spiral antenna for adaptive MIMO systems, EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Network., no. 3, pp. 382389, Aug. 2005.
[6] J.-S. Row and C.-J. Shih, Polarization-diversity ring slot antenna with
frequency agility, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 8, pp.
39533957, Aug. 2012.
[7] F. Ferrero, C. Luxey, R. Staraj, G. Jacquemod, M. Yedlin, and V.
Fusco, A novel quad-polarization agile patch antenna, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 15631567, May 2009.
[8] F. Ferrero, C. Luxey, R. Staraj, G. Jacquemod, M. Yedlin, and V. Fusco,
Theory and design of a tunable quasi-lumped quadrature coupler, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 22192222, Sep. 2009.
[9] Y. Li, Z. Zhang, W. Chen, Z. Feng, and M. F. Iskander, A dualpolarization slot antenna using a compact CPW feeding structure,
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 191194, Mar. 2010.
[10] K. C. Gupta et al., Microstrip Lines and Slotlines. Belmont, CA,
USA: Artech House, 1996, pp. 269291.
[11] W. L. Langston and D. R. Jackson, Impedance, axial-ratio, and
receive-power bandwidths of microstrip antennas, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 27692774, Oct. 2004.
[12] E. A. Soliman, S. Brebels, E. Beyne, and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, Circularly polarised aperture antenna fed by CPW and built in MCM-D
technology, Electron. Lett., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 250251, Feb. 1999.
[13] N. Herscovici, Z. Sipius, and D. Bonefacic, Circularly polarized
single-fed wide-band microstrip patch, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 12771280, Jun. 2003.
I. INTRODUCTION
Circularly polarized, microstrip-fed antennas have been intensively
studied due to their low profile, ease of fabrication, and excellent
transmission characteristics [1]. The design of multi-band circularly
polarized microstrip antennas seeks to apply these antennas to various
communication services, such as satellite communications and global
positioning systems (GPS) [2][7]. Dual-band circularly polarized
Manuscript received October 11, 2012; revised January 31, 2013; accepted
May 21, 2013. Date of publication May 30, 2013; date of current version August 30, 2013. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0003052).
The authors are with the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering,
Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 100-715, Korea (e-mail: kchwang@
dongguk.edu).
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this communication are available online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAP.2013.2265216
4832
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 61, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2013
Fig. 2. Simulated results with and without L-shaped slits: (a) reflection coefficient and (b) axial ratio. Note that the antenna parameters are shown in Table I.
,
, and
and the third circular polarization bands cannot be controlled independently [6]. In another study [7], a triple-band circularly polarized
rectangular patch antenna was proposed for GPS applications, in
which three patches with different dimensions were stacked. However,
the bandwidths when the VSWR is less than 2 at each frequency are
narrow, at 1.9%, 1.4%, and 1.7%. Furthermore, the use of a triple-layer
patch complicates the fabrication of the antenna.
In this communication, a circularly polarized slot antenna is proposed for triple-band applications. The proposed antenna exhibits not
only a broad resonance characteristic but also independent tuning
capability for each operating band of circular polarization. In order
to realize circular polarization operation in a triple-band design, three
L-shaped slit arms were engraved on a hexagonal slot. The shape
of a conventional microstrip feeding line is tapered to enhance the
impedance matching. In addition, a conducting reflector is placed
below of the antenna substrate to achieve unidirectional radiation,
thereby increasing the antenna gain. The performance of the antenna
was simulated using the ANSYS High-Frequency Structure Simulator
(HFSS). Detailed geometry of the proposed antenna, parametric
analysis, and the measured results are presented and discussed in the
following sections.
II. ANTENNA DESIGN AND SIMULATION
Fig. 1 illustrates the geometry of the proposed antenna, which is
designed on the Taconic RF-35 substrate with a thickness of 1.52
mm, a dielectric constant of 3.5 and a loss tangent of 0.0018. The
antenna consists of a hexagonal radiating slot with three L-shaped
slits and a tapered microstrip feeding line. The hexagonal slot with
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 61, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2013
,
, and
4833
TABLE I
GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS OF THE DESIGNED ANTENNA
4834
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 61, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2013
Fig. 6. Simulated magnetic current distribution with period at 3.57 GHz: (a)
, (b)
, (c)
, (d)
. Note that the antenna
parameters are shown in Table I.
Fig. 8. Simulated magnetic current distribution with period at 5.15 GHz: (a)
, (b)
, (c)
, (d)
. Note that the antenna
parameters are shown in Table I.
Fig. 7. Simulated magnetic current distribution with period at 4.17 GHz: (a)
, (b)
, (c)
, (d)
. Note that the antenna
parameters are shown in Table I.
slits 1 and 2 and the hexagonal slot are involved in the current generation, rotating counterclockwise. Fig. 8 depicts the current distribution
at 5.15 GHz. Similar to the current distribution at 4.17 GHz, the slits
1 and 2 and the hexagonal slot generate the major currents that induce
the vector sum, causing it to point from the upper right corner to the
lower left corner at
. This vector sum also rotates counterclockwise, thereby yielding the RHCP radiation.
III. MEASURED RESULTS
(see Fig. 5(b)). Based on the parametric analysis, the finally optimized
geometrical parameters of the proposed antenna are listed in Table I.
Finally, magnetic current concentrations on the aperture were simulated at each CP band to visualize the operation of the antenna. Fig. 6
illustrates the current distribution, as observed from
-direction at
3.57 GHz. Note that Ms and Mtotal represent a current vector on a
hexagonal slot and the vector sum of all major current contributions,
respectively. At
, the currents on slit 1 and the hexagonal slot
rise and their vector sum points from the upper left corner to the lower
right corner. At
, the currents near slit 3 and hexagonal slot
dominate the radiation, producing a vector sum pointing from the lower
left corner to the upper right corner. This vector sum is orthogonal to
that at
and rotates counterclockwise as the time increases, thus
producing CP radiation, as shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 7 shows the current
distribution at 4.17 GHz. Unlike the case at 3.57 GHz, it was found that
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 61, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2013
4835
Fig. 13. Measured radiation patterns at (a) 3.53 GHz, (b) 4.15 GHz, and (c)
5.08 GHz.
REFERENCES
GHz), and 5.23% (5.035.3 GHz). Fig. 12 shows a comparison of simulated and measured RHCP gains of the antenna. The measured peak
gains within the 3 dB axial ratio bands are 5.5 dBic, 4.63 dBic, and
6.77 dBic, respectively. Fig. 13 shows measured right-hand circularly
polarized and left-hand circularly polarized (LHCP) radiation patterns
and
planes at 3.53 GHz, 4.15 GHz, and 5.08 GHz.
on the
The level of co-polarization (RHCP radiation) is 16 dB higher than
that of cross-polarization (LHCP radiation) in the broadside direction
at all measured frequencies. In addition, it is important to note that the