Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: An experiment was conducted with 120 seven days old Vencobb commercial broiler chicks and continued up to 42
days of age to determine the feasibility of Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as a feed ingredient in broiler ration. The broilers are randomly
allotted to four dietary treatments; T1 (control diet without Azolla meal), T2 (diet with 5% Azolla meal), T3 (diet with 10% Azolla
meal) and T4 (diet with 15% Azolla meal) diets replacing sesame meal by Azolla meal. The composition of Azolla meal contained
25.78% crude protein, 15.71% crude fibre, 3.47% ether extract, 15.76% ash and 30.08% nitrogen free extract on the air-dry
basis. Live weight, production number and protein efficiency were (P< 0.01) significantly improved at the level off 5% Azolla
meal in broiler ration. Feed conversion ratio and energy efficiency were significantly (P< 0.01) improved in diet with 5% Azolla
meal and control diet. Total cost Tk/kg broiler was significantly (P<0.05) better in the diet with 5% Azolla meal. Dressing
percentage was significantly (P<0.01) increased on diet with 5% Azolla meal. Giblet percentage on dietary treatment T4
significantly (P<0.05) increased than other treatments. It can be conducted that use of Azolla meal up to 5% in the broiler
ration found to improve performance and may be used in broiler diet as a safe level. Azolla meal had no deleterious effect on
the palatability of broiler diets.
Key words: Azolla meal, composition of Azolla, broiler, body weight, protein and energy efficiency and dressing percent
Introduction
when they supply part of the total protein or when they are
included as a source of pigment for egg and broiler skin.
With those considerations, the experiment was under taken with
the following objectives:
I) To investigate the performance of broilers fed Azolla at
different dietary levels.
ii) To compare the production cost of broilers provided with
diets containing different levels of Azolla in the broiler ration.
29
Maize
Rice polish
LNB 60%
Sesame meal
Soybean meal
Azolla meal
Common salt
Vit Min. Premix 2.5g
Calculated nutrient composition
ME Kcal/kg
CP%
CF%
Ca%
Av. P%
Lysine%
Methionine%
Tryptophan%
Cystine%
2915
22.11
3.47
1.15
0.52
1.14
0.49
0.24
0.35
Maize
Rice polish
LNB 60%
Sesame meal
Soybean meal
Azolla meal
Common salt
Vit. Min. Premix 2.5g
Calculated nutrient composition
ME Kcal/kg
CP%
CF%
Ca%
Av. P%
Lysine%
Methionine%
Tryptophan%
Cystine%
Treatments
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T1
T2
T3
T4
520
500
490
490
150
145
140
110
90
90
90
90
95
70
35
0
140
140
140
155
0
50
100
150
5
5
5
5
+
+
+
+
2903
22.17
4.06
1.17
0.49
1.13
0.47
0.22
0.34
2906
21.91
4.65
1.17
0.45
1.12
0.43
0.20
0.32
2901
22.10
5.15
1.18
0.41
1.13
0.41
0.20
0.31
Treatments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T1
T2
T3
T4
580
570
570
560
175
165
145
130
90
90
90
90
55
40
10
0
95
80
80
65
0
50
100
150
5
5
5
5
+
+
+
+
3010
19.39
3.37
1.06
0.47
1.00
0.43
0.19
0.32
3002
19.20
3.93
1.09
0.45
0.97
0.41
0.18
0.30
soybean meal and rice polish was little changed. Nutrient levels of
the diets were adjusted in accordance with the BSTI (1988) feeding
standard. The composition of the experimental diets shown in
Table 2 and Table 3.
3003
19.04
4.46
1.10
0.41
0.95
0.38
0.16
0.28
2990
18.95
5.01
1.15
0.40
0.91
0.37
0.15
0.27
30
1994) but in Azolla meal it was 56.6 percent (Tamany et al., 1992).
So use of higher level of Azolla meal may had deleterious effect on
body weight as in T3 (140% Azolla meal) and T4 (15% Azolla meal).
While Cambel (1984) found better result using 10% and 15%
Azolla meal.
The higher level of Azolla (T3 and T 4) meal resulted poor growth
than T1 and T2 treatments. This might be due to higher level of
NDF in Azolla meal is the main limiting factor for efficient utilization
in monogastic animals (Buckingham et al., 1978). Tamany et al.
(1992) reported higher lignin i.e. 17.48% might cause poorer
growth as against the diet containing 10 and 15 percent Azolla
meal.
Feed consumption: Feed consumption was almost similar in
different dietary treatments and the differences were non
significant at all ages of the experimental period (Table 6). The
results are similar with the earlier observation of Bhuyan et al.
(1998) and Querubin et al. (1986a). They found that the inclusion
of Azolla in broiler diet did not affect feed consumption upto 15%.
Similar result also found by Castillo et al. (1981) and
Sreemannryana et al. (1993). But Bested and Morento (1985)
stated that Azolla affected the palatability of the feed and reduced
feed consumption.
31
S
1.75NS
Tx S
0.758NS
0.435NS
0.416NS
0.089
0.971*
0.487NS
1.58**
treatments was highly significant during 5-6 and 2-6 weeks of age
(Table 9). At 5-6 weeks of age the energy efficiency was best at T2
group, which differ significantly than T3 and T4 but not from T1. At
2-6 weeks of age energy efficiency was best at both T2 and T1, and
poorer energy efficiency in T3 and T 4 treatment groups. The
protein efficiency and energy efficiency showed similar trend.
Survivability: No bird died in any treatment during the
experimental period. So, survivability was cent percent in all
dietary treatment groups. This indicates that Azolla meal had no
any deleterious effects on broilers. The results are similar with
Castillo et al. (1981) who also found no toxic effect of dietary
Azolla on broiler.
32
REFERENCES:
Ali, M.A. and S. Leeson, 1995. The nutritive value of some
indigenous Asian poultry feed ingredients. Anim. Feed Sci.
and Tech., 55:227-237.
AOAC, 1990. Official method of Analysis, 13th edn. Association of
official analytical chemists, Washington DC.
Banerjee, G. C., 1992. Poultry, 3rd edn. Oxford and IBH pub. Co.
Pvt. Ltd. New Dilhi, Bombay, Calcata.
Becking, J. H., 1979. Environmental requirements of Azolla for the
use of tropical rice production. In: Nitrogen and Rice.
International Rice Research Institute. Los Banos. Leguna.
Phillipines, pp: 345-374.
Bested, S. B and. S. E. Morento, 1985. The effect of different
percentage of Azolla on fattening pigs. MSAC Journal
(Philippines), 17:31-40.
Bhuyan, M. A. H., M. R. Hasanat, M. A. Ali and M. A. Rahman,
1998. Effect of feeding Azolla (Azolla pinnata) on the
performance of broiler. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 27(1 &
2):77-82.
Boyd, C. E., 1968. Fresh water plants; a potential source of
protein. Economic Botany, 22:359-365.
Broadbent, L. A., B. J. Wilson and C. Fisher, 1981. The
composition of broiler chicken at 56 days of age: out put,
components and chemical composition. Br. Poult. Sci.,
22:385-390.
BSTI., 1988. Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institute
(Specification for poultry feeds).
Buckingham, K.E., W. E. Stepher, G. M. James and R. G. Charles,
1978. nutritive value of nitrogen fixing aquatic fern Azolla
filiculoides. J. Agri. and Food chem., 26:1230-1234.
Bul Bul, S. M. and M. A. Islam, 1991. Feasibility of using
unconventional feed in the poultry diet and formulating of
economic ration with the inoculation of the unconventional
sources. A report of a research project, sponsored by
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Department
of Poultry Science, B. A. U. Mymensingh.
Cambel, I. M., 1984. Growth performance of broilers fed with
varying levels of Azoll meal. Kabacan, North Cotabato
(Philippines), pp:66.
Castillo, L.S., A. L. Gerpacio and F. S. D. Paseual, 1981.
Exploratory studies on Azolla and fermented rice hulls in
broiler diets. College, Leguna (Philippines) pp:6.
Fujiwara, A., I. Tsuboi and F. Yoshida, 1947. Fixation of free
Nitrogen in non-leguminious plants. Azolla pinnata (In
Japaneses) Nogaku, 1:361-363.
Ghosh, G. D., 1978. Utilization of Azolla pinnata as an
unconventional source of feed in the ration of local bull
calves. M. Sc. A. H. (Thesis). Deptt. Of Animal Nutrition. B. A.
U. Mymensingh.
33
34