Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F. Lalbiakmawia
Assistant (Hydrogeologist)
Department of PHE
PHE Department Mizoram, India
R. Lalbiaknungi
Consultant
Department of PHE
PHE Department Mizoram, India
Abstract
Water quality is a term used here to express the suitability of water to sustain various uses or processes. Earth's water resources,
including rivers, lakes, oceans, and underground aquifers, are under stress in many regions. Humans need water for drinking,
sanitation, agriculture, and industry; and contaminated water can spread illnesses and disease vectors, so clean water quality is
both an environmental and a public health issue. Providing safe drinking water is one of the greatest public health challenges
facing national governments today. The water sample is collected and tested on rural area of three districts in Mizoram State to
study of water quality, India using standard methods. A study has been made to investigate the present of physical parameters
(pH, turbidity etc.), inorganic or chemical (Hardness, Calcium, alkalinity etc.) and Toxic metals (arsenic, iron etc.) of water on
the villages water source. It has been found that pH value is in the normal range in case of spring water; meanwhile the reservoir
water has pH value less than the permissible limits. Correlation analysis on the parameters of water analysis is also shown.
Keywords: Water Quality, Rural Drinking Water, Mizoram
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I.
INTRODUCTION
Water quality is affected by a wide range of natural and human influences. The most important of the natural influences are
geological, hydrological and climatic, since these affect the quantity and the quality of water available (1). Although degradation
of water quality is almost invariably the result of human activities, certain natural phenomena can result in water quality falling
below that required for particular purposes. Natural events such as torrential rainfall and hurricanes lead to excessive erosion and
landslides, which in turn increase the content of suspended material in affected rivers and lakes. Seasonal overturn of the water in
some lakes can bring water with little or no dissolved oxygen to the surface. Such natural events may be frequent or occasional.
Permanent natural conditions in some areas may make water unfit for drinking or for specific uses.
Aquatic vegetation growth, death and decomposition of aquatic plants and algae will affect the concentration of nitrogenous
and phosphorous nutrients, pH, carbonates, dissolved oxygen and other chemicals sensitive to oxidation/reduction conditions.
Aquatic vegetation has a profound effect on the chemistry of lake water and a less pronounced, but possibly significant effect, on
river water.
Under the influence of these major environmental factors, the concentrations of many chemicals in river water are liable to
change from season to season. In small watersheds (<100 km2) the influence of a single factor can cause a variation of several
orders of magnitude. Water quality is generally more constant in watersheds greater than 100,000 km2, and the variation is
usually within one order of magnitude for most of the measured variables. (2)
The degree to which wild fire degrades water quality and supply depends on wildfire extent and intensity, post wildfire
precipitation, watershed topography, and local ecology. Potential effects of wildfire on municipal water supplies and downstream aquatic ecosystems include the following:
Increased loading of streams by nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, major ions, and metals,
Post fire erosion and transport of sediment and debris to downstream water-treatment plants, water-supply reservoirs, and
aquatic ecosystems, and
Changes in source-water chemistry that can alter drinking- water treatment (3).
The polluted water may have undesirable colour, odour, taste, turbidity, organic matter contents, harmful chemical contents,
toxic and heavy metals, pesticides, oily matters, industrial waste products, radioactivity, high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS),
acids, alkalies, domestic sewage content, virus, bacteria, protozoa, rotifers, worms.,etc. Pollution of surface waters (rivers, lakes,
ponds), ground waters, sea water are all harmful for human and animal health. Pollution of the drinking water and that of food
chain is by far the most worry-some aspect (4).
111
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
Clean water is necessary for healthy communities and strong economies. Although it might be possible to remove some
contaminants from groundwater, the quality of the water drawn into a public-supply well prior to treatment remains important
because a high-quality source of water can help eliminate or reduce the risk of delivering contaminated drinking water to the
public. The quality of the source water also is an economic issue because removing contaminants from groundwater is expensive
and difficult (5).
The effects of land use, land cover, and other drainage-basin characteristics on transport and fate of highway deicing
chemicals, nutrients, naturally occurring organic compounds, fecal- indicator bacteria, and selected metals within the source area
have contributed that the quality of water source area (6).
Soil pH is generally increased after forest fire (Tufeccioglu et al., 2010; Aref et al., 2011; Boerner et al., 2009). However
significant increase occurs only at higher temperature (450-5000C) (Certini, 2005). The presence of ash may increase soil pH due
to high pH of ash (Molina et al., 2007; Schafer and Mack, 2010). Soil pH is inexorably increased by the soil heating as a result of
organic acids denaturation. However, significant increases occur only at high temperatures (>4505000C), in coincidence of the
complete combustion of fuel and the consequent release of bases (Arocena and Opio 2003) that also leads to an enhancement of
base saturation (Macadam 1987). Khanna et al. (1994) assessed that the capacity of ash to neutralise soil acidity is well
correlated with the sum of the concentrations of K,Ca, and Mg in the ash itself. (7)
II. STUDY AREA
About the Population
According to the 2011 census Mamit district has a population of 85,757. The district has a population density of 28 inhabitants
per square kilometre (73 /sq mi) . In 1985 Mamit district became home to Dampa Tiger Reserve, which has an area of 500 km.
According to the 2011 census Aizawl district has a population of 404,054. The district occupies an area of 3,576.31 square
kilometres. The district has a population density of 113 inhabitants per square kilometre (290/sq mi).
According to the 2011 census Serchhip district has a population of 64,937. The district occupies an area of 1421.60 km. The
district has a population density of 29 inhabitants per square kilometre (75/sq mi). In 1991 the area became home to the
Khawnglung Wildlife Sanctuary, which has an area of 35 km.
Table 1.1
Details of study area
District Area (in km) Population
Aizawl
3576.31
404054
Mamit
3025.75
85797
Serchhip
1421.60
64937
112
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
RATU
22
BAWNGTHA
H
22
LENGTE
22
SAITHAH
22
7
Mamit
8
Rainwate
r
W.
PHAILENG
BAWNGTHA
H
9
10
11
22
22
LENGTE
22
12
SAITHAH
22
13
W.
PHAILENG
22
14
LUNGKAWLH
22
15
KHUMTUNG
22
16
EAST
THINGLIAN
22
Mamit
Serchh
ip
Spring
Reservoi
r
17
HMUNTHA
22
18
N.
MUALCHENG
22
19
LUNGKAWLH
22
KHUMTUNG
22
EAST
THINGLIAN
22
22
HMUNTHA
22
23
N.
22
20
21
Serchh
ip
Handpu
mp( Tube
well)
1.43
3.14
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.85
1.00
6.58
1.00
6.33
1.00
6.10
0.10
6.64
1.00
6.00
1.00
5.70
1.00
7.00
1.00
6.50
1.00
6.00
7.55
3.82
20.6
4
20.6
4
22.0
9
18.0
0
20.0
0
20.0
0
16.0
0
28.8
6
35.6
8
17.6
0
25.7
7
14.3
6
20.0
0
20.0
0
40.0
0
25.0
0
30.0
11.9
1
11.9
1
14.4
1
18.0
0
10.0
0
10.0
0
14.0
0
10.5
9
13.0
9
6.07
7.64
19.8
2
10.0
0
10.0
0
11.3
6
10.4
5
11.3
6
12.2
7
12.2
7
14.7
7
14.7
7
17.2
7
8.00
0.11
1.23
0.00
0.00
0.45
7.73
0.00
2.27
0.05
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
8.77
0.00
0.05
8.91
6.86
0.00
0.11
8.27
2.80
0.00
0.09
8.67
6.14
5.91
0.00
0.05
12.0
8
5.27
7.45
0.00
0.11
0.09
8.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
25.0
0
2.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
5.00
0.00
15.0
0
25.0
0
10.0
0
15.0
20.0
0
10.0
0
13.0
0
5.00
6.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
10.0
8.00
4.00
0.00
0.30
4.00
19.3
2
10.4
5
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.0
e-Coli
22
21.3
6
21.5
5
31.0
0
14.2
7
11.4
5
24.3
2
21.0
5
13.0
9
13.1
8
13.4
5
13.4
5
14.8
2
10.0
0
16.0
0
20.0
0
12.0
0
Total
Coliform
KELSIH
10.1
9
8.27
107.
91
42.5
5
101.
86
85.4
5
136.
00
22.1
8
36.8
2
36.8
2
32.1
0
50.0
0
32.0
0
50.0
0
40.0
0
Iron (mg/L)
Spring
25.3
6
Arsenic
(mg/L)
22
Aizawl
55.6
4
14.4
5
47.5
5
33.4
5
53.0
9
Nitrate
(mg/L)
NAUSEL
2.22
81.9
3
26.6
0
137.
40
63.2
0
72.0
8
29.0
9
33.0
0
33.0
0
30.8
2
24.0
0
23.0
0
23.0
0
23.0
0
Fluoride
(mg/L)
22
0.87
Sulphate
(mg/L)
MUALPHEN
G
7.3
7
7.0
4
7.7
5
7.4
5
7.4
9
6.7
5
6.4
2
6.4
2
6.4
3
7.2
1
6.8
0
7.5
0
6.8
1
6.2
2
6.3
9
6.3
4
6.0
2
6.0
9
6.0
3
6.2
0
6.7
5
5.8
2
6.0
Chloride
(mg/L)
22
Alkalinity
(mg/L)
ZAWNGIN
Type of
water
source
Total
Dissolved
Solids (mg/L)
Calcium
Hardness
(mg/L)
Magnesium
Hardness
(mg/L)
Distric
t
Turbidity(NT
U)
Village Name
No of
sample
s
collect
ed
Sl
No
pH
Table 1.2
Correlation between water parameters before monsoon
113
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
MUALCHENG
Spring
22
NAUSEL
22
KELSIH
22
RATU
22
BAWNGTHAH
22
LENGTE
22
SAITHAH
22
W. PHAILENG
7
Mamit
Spring
10
22
LUNGKAWLH
22
KHUMTUNG
22
HMUNTHA
13
22
N.
MUALCHENG
14
22
LUNGKAWLH
22
KHUMTUNG
22
HMUNTHA
22
N.
MUALCHENG
11
12
15
16
Serchhi
p
Serchhi
p
Reservoi
r
Spring
17
20
21
22
23
Serchhi
p
Hand
pump(
Tube
well)
22
LUNGKAWLH
22
KHUMTUNG
22
HMUNTHA
22
N.
MUALCHENG
58.7
71.9
28.2
40.0
24.5
26.9
7.1
6.8
6.0
6.6
7.0
6.7
5.0
6.8
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.7
19.2
83.2
18.6
72.0
29.0
111.
8
5.2
50.0
10.0
50.0
22.4
62.1
5.0
59.1
7.5
25.2
10.9
12.
6
0.0
31.2
6.3
7.5
0.0
13.6
6.4
6.2
0.0
19.4
5.3
7.5
0.0
16.0
6.0
2.0
0.0
18.0
10.0
3.0
0.0
14.0
8.0
4.0
0.0
12.0
8.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
71.
6
73.
2
100.
0
12.0
8.0
0.0
82.0
10.0
9.0
0.0
114.
0
14.0
10.
0
0.0
80.0
22.0
4.0
0.0
0.
1
0.
0
0.
2
0.
2
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
1
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
1
0.
0
0.
0
0.
5
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.6
0.0
4.0
1.0
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.
0
10.
0
40.
0
10.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
Iron (mg/L)
44.0
11.
4
10.
7
10.
3
10.
7
11.
3
Arsenic (mg/L)
8.5
10.
9
10.
2
19.
1
18.
0
11.
3
25.
0
25.
0
24.
8
Nitrate (mg/L)
98.1
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
1
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
e-Coli
Aizawl
101.
3
26.4
Total Coliform
24.1
44.
6
10.
8
41.
4
27.
5
39.
6
10.
2
15.
0
25.
6
13.
6
27.
7
30.
1
19.
7
14.
4
18.
0
18.
0
14.
0
18.
0
50.
0
48.
0
54.
0
50.
0
Fluoride (mg/L)
MUALPHENG
72.0
Sulphate (mg/L)
22
2.
6
2.
1
5.
3
1.
3
2.
6
1.
0
1.
0
1.
0
1.
0
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
0.
1
Chloride (mg/L)
6.
7
6.
6
7.
1
6.
7
6.
7
7.
2
7.
0
7.
0
7.
0
6.
2
6.
3
6.
0
6.
1
6.
3
6.
5
6.
1
6.
1
6.
4
6.
6
6.
6
6.
4
Alkalinity (mg/L)
ZAWNGIN
22
Village Name
District
Type of
water
source
Turbidity(NTU)
No of
sample
collecte
d
Sl
No
pH
Table 1.3
Correlation between water parameters after monsoon
114
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
115
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
Fig. 1.4: Tube well vs Reservoir water (pre monsoon), Serchhip District
Fig. 1.5: Spring vs Tube well vs Reservoir (post monsoon), Serchhip District
Fig. 1.6: Reservoir vs. Tube well (pre Monsoon & post Monsoon), Serchhip district
All rights reserved by www.ijste.org
116
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
e-Coli
Total Coliform
Iron (mg/L)
Arsenic (mg/L)
Nitrate (mg/L)
Fluoride (mg/L)
Sulphate (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Magnesium
Hardness (mg/L)
Calcium
Hardness (mg/L)
Total Dissolved
Solids (mg/L)
Turbidity(NTU)
Parameters
Ph
Turbidity(NTU)
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L)
Calcium Hardness (mg/L)
Magnesium Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L)
Sulphate (mg/L)
Fluoride (mg/L)
Nitrate (mg/L)
Arsenic (mg/L)
Iron (mg/L)
Total Coliform
e-Coli
pH
Table - 1.4
Correlation between water parameters before monsoon
1
0.521
1
0.770
0.798
1
0.441
0.452
0.620
1
0.616
0.328
0.633
0.735
1
0.858
0.530
0.875
0.656
0.769
1
0.793
0.518
0.768
0.236
0.429 0.703
1
0.383
0.285
0.589
0.173
0.305 0.549 0.579
1
0.036
-0.034 -0.129
0.250
0.213 -0.134 -0.197 -0.158 1
-0.434
-0.002 -0.329
0.213
-0.142 -0.438 -0.543 -0.494 0.502
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-0.179
-0.306 -0.310 -0.315 -0.090 -0.270 0.002 -0.050 0.202 0.048 0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 1
There is a strong positive correlation between pH and other water parameters.
There is weak correlation between Turbidity and water parameters. This shows that there is minimum amount of organic content in
the water.
117
Assessment of Rural Water Quality in Aizawl, Mamit and Serchhip District of Mizoram, India
(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 06 / 021)
Total dissolved solids shows strong positive relationship with pH value (0.770), Turbidity (0.798), magnesium hardness
(0.633), Alkalinity (0.875), Chloride (0.768).
Calcium hardness and magnesium hardness shows strong correlation with Alkalinity (0.656), (0.769).
Alkalinity shows strong positive relationship between other parameters. Magnesium Hardness (0.769), pH value (0.858),
Total dissolved solids (0.875).
e-Coli
Total Coliform
Iron (mg/L)
Arsenic (mg/L)
Nitrate (mg/L)
Fluoride
(mg/L)
Sulphate
(mg/L)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Alkalinity
(mg/L)
Magnesium
Hardness
(mg/L)
Calcium
Hardness
(mg/L)
Total Dissolved
Solids (mg/L)
Turbidity(NTU)
pH
Parameters
Table - 1.5
Correlation between water parameters after monsoon
pH
1
Turbidity(NTU)
0.595
1
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L)
0.634
0.935
1
Calcium Hardness (mg/L)
0.055
0.155 0.194
1
Magnesium Hardness (mg/L)
-0.110
-0.268 -0.269 0.842
1
Alkalinity (mg/L)
0.711
0.811 0.909
0.147
-0.263
1
Chloride (mg/L)
0.782
0.450 0.518 -0.063
-0.196 0.556
1
Sulphate (mg/L)
0.487
0.205 0.191 -0.154
-0.236 0.421 0.289
1
Fluoride (mg/L)
-0.127
0.205 0.210 -0.152
-0.245 0.060 0.022 -0.052
1
Nitrate (mg/L)
-0.013
-0.187 -0.205 0.683
0.895 -0.217 -0.109 -0.184 -0.202
1
Arsenic (mg/L)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Iron (mg/L)
0.316
-0.018 0.178 -0.065
-0.083 0.251 0.423 0.297 0.139 -0.073 0
1
Total Coliform
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 1
e-Coli
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 1
There is a strong positive correlation between pH and other water parameters such as total dissolved solids, alkalinity and
chloride in both pre- and post-monsoon water.
There is strong correlation of chemical properties of water between turbidity and total dissolved solids in both season.
pH value, Alkalinity and Total Dissolved Solids are having high correlation each other than the remaining parameters. It
indicates that their contribution to the water quality is high in the study area in both pre season and post monsoon.
V. CONCLUSION
The water of spring source in the study area was pH value between 6.5 to 8.5 (i.e. within the permissible limit of drinking
water). Meanwhile, water sample taken from the Tube well and reservoir have low pH value. This may be due to the highly
present of sandstone and shale in the study area. Forest fire for agriculture purpose (shifting cultivation) has caused the water
quality. Rainfall is one of the factors which cause the changing of water quality parameter. The water quality in the study area is
mainly determined by the present of dissolved solids and turbidity in water.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to their colleagues of Mizoram University and PHE Department of Mizoram for their co-operation
and support during the course of study.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Jamie Bartram and Richard Balance, Water Quality Monitoring - A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater, Quality Studies and
Monitoring Programmes United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization.
Emelko, M.B., Silins, U., Bladon, K.D., Stone, M., 2011, Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate
Demonstrating the need for source water supply and protection strategies: Water Research, v. 45, p 461472.
Trivedi, R.C.(CPCB)2003, Key Note AddressWater Quality Standards, International
Conference on Water Quality Management, Febuary, New
Delhi.
National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Factors Affecting Public-Supply-Well Vulnerability to Contamination: Understanding Observed Water
Quality and Anticipating Future Water Quality US Geological Survey 2001.
Marcus C. Waldron and Gardner C. Bent, Factors Affecting Reservoir and Stream-Water Quality in the Cambridge, Massachusetts, Drinking-Water
Source Area and Implications for Source-Water Protection.
Satyam Verma, S. Jayakumar(2012), Impact of forest fire on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil: A review Proceedings of the
International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2(3):168-176
Giacomo Certini (2005), Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review February Springer-Verlag.
118