Professional Documents
Culture Documents
di turbine a gas
Gas Path
Analysis
Measurement
acquisition
Normalized
value
2
Measurement validation
Database
Acceptable
measurement?
Measurement
expected value
YES
Normalized value
Trend Analysis
4-5
Gas Path Analysis
Determination of HIs
Qualitative information on
gas turbine Health State
6
Analisi dello stato di funzionamento di turbine a gas
Quantitative information
on gas turbine Health State
Decisional process
NO
Measurement
acquisition
Normalized
value
2
Measurement validation
Database
Acceptable
measurement??
Measurement
expected value
NO
YES
Normalized value
Trend Analysis
4-5
Gas Path Analysis
Determination of HIs
Qualitative information on
gas turbine Health State
Quantitative information
on gas turbine Health State
Decisional process
9 Field measurements
8 Measurement accuracy
8 CP tuning
9 Health Indices
8 Measurement number
Measurement
acquisition
Normalized
value
Database
Measurement
expected value
Field measurements Qm
Cycle Program
Analisi dello stato di funzionamento di turbine a gas
Expected values Qm
Normalized value
Qm
Q = '
Qm
*
m
Measurement
acquisition
Database
Measurement
expected value
1.20
p2*
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
Analisi dello stato di funzionamento di turbine a gas
Measurement
acquisition
2
Measurement validation
Database
Measurement
expected value
Acceptable
measurement?
NO
YES
Two techniques
both applied to the
normalized trend over time
of each measurement
Measurements accuracy
[% of reference value]
Confidence band
[% of trend value]
T2
0.85
[-1 ; + 5.5]
p2
1.00
[-4; + 3]
T6
0.75
[-1 ; + 5.5]
1.20
p2*
Acceptable data
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
xi xm
k,
S
i = 1,..., N
xi xm
kB S
t k A ,
lim t + 1
2
kA = 1+
4N
i = 1,..., N
k B = (1 + N ) (1 + S ov S i )
1
N
Normalized value
Trend Analysis
4-5
Gas Path Analysis
Determination of HIs
Qualitative information on
gas turbine Health State
6
Qwp measurable
variables defining GT
working point
Qm measurable variables
along the gas path
Quantitative information
on gas turbine Health State
Decisional process
GPA model
(Cycle Program)
Health
indices X
Computed estimates of
the measurable quantities
(Q m,c)
Measured quantities (Q m)
in multiple operating points
MINIMIZATION
ALGORIT HM
min Fob (X 1, ..., X nx)
GT Characteristic Parameters
determination can be performed by
minimizing Fob
(sum of the square differences between
measured and computed values of the
measurable variables, performed on
one or multiple operating points)
2
N
1 op N m Qm,c Qm
Fob ( X 1 ,..., X N x ) =
wi
N op j=1 i =1
Qm
i
X 1, ..., X nx
which minimize Fob
Fault simulation
FAULT SIMULATION
Gas turbine operating state determination consists of the
assessment of the modification, due to deterioration and fault, of
performance and geometric data characterizing machine components.
1.02
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
healthy
0.90
faulty
0.88
0.70
1.4
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.70
healthy
faulty
16 bar line
16 bar line
PGT5R/2
95100 C
4043 C
2528 C
SEA PLATFORMS
SOLAR
CC
GGT
PT
ot
F
a
Six Qwp meas. to define the working point: NGGT, NPT, PPT, pa, Ta, RHa
Three Qm meas. are available:
C, C , GGT
Lack of measurement
Lack of fuel mass flow rate measurement (Mf).
Only the total fuel mass flow feeding the three PGT5R/2 GTs is available
pgas)
E [%]
0.0
-1.5
3.5
4.5
PPT [MW]
5.5
Acceptable data
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
1.20
T2*
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
1.20
T6*
1.10
- poc (2 % in 70 days )
and Toc comp. fouling
1.00
0.90
- Tot slightly
0.80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
days 70
Acceptable data
Unacceptable data
- Remarkable reduction of
the scattering of HI trends,
by using acceptable
measurement sets only
0
-5
-10
10
E
[%]
5
0
-5
-10
10
E
[%]
5
GGT
0
-5
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
days 70
1.1
ggt
ggt
1.0
1.0
pt
c
c
c
0.9
0.9
1.0
ggt
0.9
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.1
Regressione
Regression
Acquisizione
Acquisition
dati da DCS
from DCS
insertion
Misure
Measurements
Input.txt
Dati
Data
calcolo
Direct
Diretto
Database
Database
SATURN-D
Inverso
Inverse
Maintenance
Interventi
reports
Ciclo
Directdiretto
cycle
Inverse
Ciclo
inverso
cycle
Output
Output
diretto.txt
Direct.out
Output
Output
Inverse.out
inverso.txt
Regressione
Regression
Visualizzazione
su schermo
Q gasC Q gasM
Q gasC
LPI
[%]
The compressed
gas production
loss is
0.4
+ 13 %
0.0
-0.4
0
28
56
84
112
140
day 168
Conclusions
The methodology proved effective in supporting plant
operation and maintenance management:
Identification of unreliable measurements sets and remarkable
reduction of the scattering of the measurement trends
Gas turbine health state determination over a 2-month period:
compressor fouling, while gas generator turbine was not suffering
from significant changes in health state
The multi-point analysis (applied before and after a maintenance
stop) allowed a more detailed analysis
Software to automate the diagnostic process and to support plant
operation and management: the loss of production, due to gas
turbine deterioration, was identified
Analisi dello stato di funzionamento di turbine a gas