WORKSHOP

The Building Support Structure in Architecture: a

visual analysis and design of structures with
computers using SAP2000.

Workshop Homework Problems (metric)

as presented by the following Examples/Problems reference

Reference:
Building Support Structures, Analysis and Design with SAP2000
Software, 2nd ed., eBook by Wolfgang Schueller, 2015
The SAP2000V15 Examples and Problems SDB files are available on the
Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) website: csiamerica.com/go/schueller

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

AXIAL SYSTEMS: Trusses

Problem 1 (EX. 6.1)
EXAMPLE 6.1: Analysis of basic truss forms
Investigate some simple, basic truss forms based on the Howe-type of member layout (a similar
approach can be used for other common layouts, such as Pratt, Warren, K-truss, and lattice). Then
make the following changes, as indicated in the drawing below, by reshaping the truss configuration,
that is, play with the truss object using the Set Reshape Element Mode in SAP2000, by considering:

Profile: rectangular, triangular, curved, trapezoidal, and other asymmetrical shapes, that is,
contours.
Load arrangement, load direction, and load location: symmetrical and asymmetrical, vertical
and horizontal, top-loaded and bottom-loaded.
Support location and orientation: simple beams, cantilever beams, overhanging beams, frames,
etc.

For determinate structures, disregard the effect of material and member sizes, i.e., the frame elements
may be modeled with zero moments of inertia, or the default setting may be used since member
stiffness has no effect on the magnitude of internal member forces; however, do not use deflection
results.
Generate at least four different truss shapes on a 1x 1-m square grid, as shown in the drawing below.
Apply vertical, single loads of 5 kN (e.g. P vertical) at the top chord joints, as indicated in the drawing;
treat the horizontal forces of 2 kN (e.g. P horizontal) as a separate load case. Show the axial force flow
with numerical values, and show the reaction forces. Study the character of the given trusses and also
the relationship of member tension and compression so you can develop a feeling for the structure
and predict the direction of the force flow; try also to predict the deflection conceptually.
Check some of your results manually (graphically or analytically):
Check the reactions of two trusses with asymmetrical support or loading conditions.
Check the member forces of two joints for the two trusses.

a. b.
c. d.

1
1

The results of SAP2000 are checked for the particular truss layout of a parallel chord, modified Warren
truss in case (a). For the manual check of some of the computer results, the following process is used.
Check some of the SAP2000 results manually
Check Warren truss: case a,

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Cable-Supported Structures: stayed bridges

Problem 3 : Stayed bridges

Investigate several basic stayed bridge structures shown below under a uniform gravity
load of 40 kN/m; but assign 22 kN/m to the outer spans of the stayed bridge in case f;
assign zero to self weight. Disregard in this oversimplified first approach live-load
arrangement, wind loads, thermal loads, and the prestressing of the cables and the
eccentric application of the stays to the girders. The beams are simply supported at the
towers. Determine the approximate beam size using W30 (W760) or W36 (W920) sections
(A36 steel 250 MPa) as an initial input into SAP2000. Keep in mind that the beams in
reality may consist of multi-cell roadway box girders. Use as a first trial nominal 50-mm
diameter strands for the inner stays and 40-mm diameter strands for the outer stays, using
A416 Gr. 250 ( 1500 N/mm2, MPa). Neglect axial strains in the towers by allocating
large values to the cross-sectional area (just assume 1x1-m concrete sections using 6000
psi 40 N/mm2 for this conceptual study). Draw the bridge shapes on a 5x5-m grid, as
shown in the drawing. Consider P-Delta analysis plus large displacements.
Investigate conceptually the axial force flow and bending moments in the beams together
with the reaction forces and deformations. Study the character of the given structures and
also the relationship of member tension and compression, so that you can develop a
feeling for the structure and predict the direction of the force flow; try also to predict
conceptually the deflection.

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS:
Load Types and Boundary Conditions
Problem 4: Beam load types
Investigate for the beam cases shown below,
Boundary conditions, including cantilever action
Load types, a counterclockwise moment of 42 kNm acts at the left support of case (k), clockwise
uniform torsional loads of 4 kNm/m act along the beam span of case (e), a clockwise moment of
63 kNm acts at the right reaction of case (d), and a counterclockwise moment of 16 kNm at the left
support of the same case, etc.
Load distribution
Indeterminate action
The beams are drawn on a 2-m grid; in other words, the beams span 6 m. The uniform load is 14 kN/m
unless shown. For beam selection use SAP default setting (i.e. FSEC1).
Show input (geometry and loading), moment, and shear diagrams with numerical values at critical
locations, and deflections.
The critical moments of the cases are checked (by referring to TABLES B.10 and B.11, or other
references) to make sure that the computer results are meaningful; check the indeterminate beams
approximately.

14 kN/m

A.
14 kN/m

14 kN/m

14 kN/m

14 kN/m

B.

C.
42 kNm
D.

42 kNm

63 kNm

14 kN/m

I.

J.
14 kN/m
84 kN

4 kNm/m

K.

E.
F.

G.

H.

42 kN

28 kN/m

28 kN/m

42 kN

L.

28 kN 28 kN 28 kN

M.

21 kN/m

N.

28 kN/m

28 kN/m

7 kN/m

O.

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Floor Framing 1

Problem 11: Design of steel floor beams

The floor framing for a typical interior bay of a multi-story braced steel skeleton structure
is shown below. The composite deck distributes dead and live load of 4 kN/m2 each to the
beams; the live-load reduction factors are 0.96 for the beams and 0.8 for the interior
girders; however, for this approximation, 0.96 also is used conservatively for the girders.
Use A36 (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2) steel or Q235 (Fy = 235
N/mm2) in China and flexible connections. The compression flanges of the filler beams
and girders are assumed fully laterally supported by the floor slab.
Design the floor beams using SAP for working stress approach (AISC-ASD89 or the
Chinese 2002 design code). For the automatic section selection in SAP2000, assume W18
(W460) beams or GB-HN300 to GB-HN400 in China which, however, is not included
in the SAP2000Ed version. .

GI

3 Sp @ 2.5 m = 7.5 m

8m

BM

BM

BM

BM

GI

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Floor Framing 2

Problem 12: Design of steel floor framing

Investigate the simple, hinged floor framing for the three 6 x 6-m bays shown below. The
floor load consists of a dead load of 3.40 kN/m2 where beam weight is included, and a
live load of 2.90 kN/m2; ignore live-load reduction for this preliminary investigation.
Select the most economical sections for the beams as well as girders assuming full lateral
support of the compression flanges. Design the floor beams using (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa
or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2) steel and flexible connections; use working stress approach
(AISC-ASD89). For the automatic section selection in SAP2000, try for the filler beams
W10 (W250) sections and for the girders W16 (W410) sections. Check manually beams
BM1, G2 and G4 to see whether the computer output makes sense.

G1

6m

BM2

BM1

BM1

BM2

G2

BM2
BM5

Bm5

BM1

G1

G4

BM5

BM5

G3

BM3

BM1
BM5

BM5

BM4
3 Sp @ 2 m = 6 m

BM2
6m

3 Sp @ 2 m = 6 m

BM3

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Surface Structures: slabs

Problem 15: square concrete slabs
Investigate a square 15 cm concrete slab, 4 x 4 m in size shown below that carries a
uniform load of 5.75 kN/m2 (COMB1), that is a dead load of 0.15(23.56) = 3.53 kN/m2 for
its own weight (SLABDL taken care by self weight) and an additional dead load 0.24
kN/m2 (SUPERD), and a live load of 1.92 kN/m2 (LIVE). Use the default concrete
material properties in SAP2000 (i.e. 4000 psi 28 MPa or N/mm2 = 2.8 kN/cm2) or in
China C30 (fc = 30 N/mm2) and A615 Grade 60 rebars (Fy = 60 ksi 420 N/mm2 = 42
kN/cm2) or Chinese HRB400 (Fy = 360 N/mm2). Solve the problem by using 0.5 x 0.5 m
plate elements using SAP. Use a concrete cover of reinforcement of 19 mm.
a) Assume one-way, simply supported slab action.
b) Assume a two-way slab, simply supported along the perimeter.
c) Assume the slab is clamped along the edges to approximate a continuous interior
two-way slab.
d) Assume flat plate action where the slab is simply supported by small columns at the
four corners.
e) Assume cantilever plate action with four corner supports for a center bay of 3 x 3 m.
f) Assume umbrella action of the plate with the center column fixed to the plate.
Check the answers manually using approximations. Compare the various slab systems
that is study the effect of support location on force flow.

b
0.5 m

4m

3m

0.5 m

4m

0.5 m
2m
3m
2m
0.5 m
d

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Floor Framing

Problem 16: Design of concrete floor beams

A 6-story concrete frame office building consists of 9x10-m bays with a typical
interior floor framing bay shown below. The 16.5-cm concrete slab weighs
0.165 m [24 kN/m3 (4.50 m 0.30 m)/4.5 m] = 3.70 kN/m2, while the self weight of
the floor beams is automatically taken into account by SAP2000. The slab
supports 0.24 kN/m2 for ceiling and floor finish, a partition of 1.00 kN/m2, as well
as a live load of 4.00 kN/m2. Hence, the superimposed dead load is: 3.70 + 0.24 +
1.00 = 4.94 kN/m2. Disregard the critical pattern live load moments in SAP2000 for
this first investigation.
The girders are 610 mm high and 410 mm wide, whereas the beams have the same
depth but are 300 mm wide. The 3.70-m high columns have a size of 460x460 mm
for the lower floors. A typical interior intermediate floor beam (i.e., beam
between column lines) is investigated briefly assuming the ends of the
columns fixed at the floors above and below (modeling 6 bays). Use a concrete
strength of fc' = 4000 psi (28 N/mm2, MPa) or in China C30 (fc = 30 N/mm2), and
A615 Grade 60 rebars, fy = fys = 60 ksi 420 N/mm2 = 42 kN/cm2, or Chinese
HRB400 (Fy = 360 N/mm2), and assume a concrete cover to rebar center of 65 mm.
Use ACI 318-05 or the Chinese 2002 design code (which however is not included
in the SAP2000Ed version).
The net spans of typical beams, girders, and columns respectively are,
lbm1 = 10.00 0.41 = 9.59 m
lbm2 = 10.00 0.46 = 9.54 m
lg = 9.00 0.46 = 8.54 m
lcn= 3.70 0.610 = 3.09 m

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Frame Structures: folded beams

Problem 17: Folded beam systems

Simple-span 6-m span, folded beam systems as shown below, are drawn on a 1.50 x
1.50-m grid, are investigated with respect to the effect of geometry on the bending
moment distributions, shear distribution, axial force flow, and reactions.
a) Use a single load of 48 kN for each case at mid-span (SINGLEP).
b) Use a uniform load of 16 kN/m on global z-projection (UNIFORM).
For the determinate structures the frame elements may be modeled by using A36 (Fy = 36
ksi 250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2) steel and the default setting (FSEC1 section),
since member stiffness has no effect on the magnitude of internal member forces; but, do
not use deflection results.
Show the magnitude of the reactions and moment diagrams as well as axial force
diagrams with their maximum values.
Check some of your answers manually to be sure that the computer solutions are all right.

b
a

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Frame Structures: three-hinged frames

Problem 18: Three-hinged frames

Investigate the following 12-m span, three-hinged frame structure systems drawn on a 1.50 x
1.50 m grid, with respect to the effect of geometry (e.g. column and beam inclination) on force
flow in statically determinate structures by studying conceptually the bending moment
distribution, axial force flow, the reactions, and the deflected shapes.
Use a uniform dead load (D) of 7.30 kN/m and a live load (L) of 10.95 kN/m on global zprojection and a lateral wind load of 7.20 kN/m on global x-projection (i.e. 0.80 kN/m2 for 9-m
spacing of frames). Consider the following load combinations for this preliminary investigation:
COMB1 (D + L), COMB2 (D + W), and COMB3 [D + 0.75(L + W)].
For the design the steel frames use the AISC-ASD 89 working stress approach as based on A36
steel (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2) and W21 (i.e. W530) sections
(AUTOW21) but use W12 (i.e. W310) sections (AUTOW12) for the arched shapes (b, d, and e).
After the first design cycle, the structure has to be reanalyzed with the new member sections and
be redesigned. Keep in mind that in the computer program design is an iterative process, where
the analysis and design must be run multiple times to complete the design process. In other words
check: Design > Steel Frame Design > Verify Analysis vs. Design Section.
For the design of the frame beams assume an unbraced length ratio of Lb/L = 0.1 about the minor
axis for preliminary design purposes, and consider the columns laterally braced about their minor
axis (Ky =1).
Show the magnitude of the reactions and moment diagrams as well as axial force diagrams with
their maximum values. Check several of your answers manually to be sure that the computer
solutions make sense.

a
b

c
d

e
f
g
h

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Frame Structures: basic arches

Problem 21: Basic arches
Investigate the simple circular three-hinged, 12-m span arch systems and half-arch
systems shown below, with respect to the effect of arch proportion and load arrangement
on intensity of force flow using SAP. The shallow arch is 2.4 m high consisting of ten
linear segments and the steep arch is a semicircular arch consisting of 12 linear segments.
Use for dead load wD = 7.30 kN/m (D) applied along the arch, for live load wL = 7.30
kN/m (LFULL for full loading and LHALF for loading half span) on the horizontal roof
projection, and for wind wW = 5.80 kN/m (W) on the vertical roof projection. Consider the
following load combinations for this preliminary investigation: COMB1 (D + LFULL),
COMB2 (D + LHALF), COMB3 [D + 0.75(LFULL + W)] and COMB4 [D +
0.75(LHALF+ W)].
Draw the arch images on a 1.20 x 1.20-m grid. Select W10 (i.e. W250) sections using
Auto Select and AISC-ASD 89 working stress approach as based on A36 steel (Fy = 36 ksi
250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2). For the design of the arches use an unbraced length ratio
of Lb/L = 0.1 about the minor axis for preliminary design purposes. Study the load
combinations and determine which ones control the design. Show and study the
magnitude of the reactions and bending moment distribution with critical values, as well
as axial force flow with their maximum values. Check some of your answers manually to
see whether the computer solutions make sense.

2.4 m

90 m
12

d
6m

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Beam Design

Problem 5: steel beam design

Design a continuous 3-span steel beam with spans of 6 m, which carries a uniform dead load and live load each
of 22 kN/m, using A36 (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2) or Q235 (Fy = 235 N/mm2 ) in China
and a W18(W460) section or GB-HN300 to GB-HN400 in China; consider the critical live load arrangement.
Assume the weight of the beam is included in the dead load. Consider the beam laterally supported by the floor
slab assuming an unbraced length ratio about the minor axis of say 0.1. Use the AISC-ASD 89 working stress
approach or the Chinese 2002 design code, which however is not included in the SAP2000Ed version.
(I cannot check the Chinese solution because I do not know the Chinese 2002 design code! SAP2000 does not
seem to auto select the most economical member but uses the largest section of the list)

Manual check of SAP2000 results:

a) ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN (ASD): fb = M/S Fb = 0.66 Fy, or Sx Mx /Fb = Mx/0.66Fy
The critical moment occurs at the interior support and may be roughly approximated as,
M wL2/10 = 2(22)(6)2/10 = 158.4 kN-m = 15840 kN-cm
Sx Mx/Fb = Mx/0.66Fy = 15840/0.66(25) = 960 cm3

Try W18x40 , (W460 x60), Sx = 1121 cm3 (from SAP2000). The SAP2000 reports the same section
with a stress ratio fb /Fb = 0.925.
b) LOAD AND RESISTANT FACTOR DESIGN (LRFD):
Mu bMn = bMp = 0.9FyZx, or Zx Mu/0.9Fy,
Mu (1.2wD +1.6wL)L2/10 = (1.2(22) + 1.6(22)62/10 = 222 kNm = 22176 kNcm
Zx Mu/0.9Fy = 22176/0.9(25) = 986 cm3, try W18 x 35,, (460x52), Zx = 1090 cm3, using AISCLRFD99
The SAP2000 reports the same section with a stress ratio fb /Fb = 0.988.

Problem 6: concrete beam design

Do a preliminary design of the steel beam in Problem 5 as a concrete beam disregarding the change in loading,
using the default concrete material properties in SAP2000 (i.e. 4000 psi 28 MPa or N/mm2 = 2.8 kN/cm2) or
in China C30 (fc = 30 N/mm2) and trying b/h = 25/50 cm (9.84/19.69 in) section; disregard the difference in
loading conditions. Use ACI 318-05 or the Chinese 2002 design code (which however is not included in the
SAP2000Ed version) and A615 Grade 60 rebars (Fy = 60 ksi 420 N/mm2 = 42 kN/cm2) or Chinese HRB400
(Fy = 360 N/mm2) and a bar cover of 6 cm. The typical, interior continuous beam to be investigated is supported
by 30x30-cm columns, hence the beam has a net span of, ln = 6.00 0.30 = 5.70 m, or the end length offsets are
15 cm. Check the REBAR PERCENTAGE to see whether the assumed section makes sense.
(I cannot check the Chinese solution because I do not know the Chinese 2002 design code!)

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Beam Types

Problem 7: the effect of beam: span, continuity, and live load arrangement
Investigate for the multi-span beam types shown below, the effect of span, continuity, live-load
arrangement, and hinging. The beams are shown on a 1.00-m grid, in other words, the top beam spans
12 m, while the 3-span beams each span 4 m. The beams carry dead and live loads of 7 kN/m each;
investigate the various live-load arrangements and determine the critical ones. Design the laterally
supported beams using W12 (W310) sections or GB-HN200 to 400 in China; use A36 (Fy= 36 ksi 250 MPa or
N/mm2=25 kN/cm2) steel or Q235 (Fy = 235 N/mm2 ) in China as based on the AISC-ASD 89 working stress
approach or the Chinese 2002 design code, which however is not included in the SAP2000Ed version.
Set the self weight of beams equal to zero. Show input (geometry and loading), shear and moment
diagrams with numerical values at critical locations, deflections, and member sections. Check the design of
the beams and make sure that the critical load combinations are used by SAP2000.

A.

SIMPLE BEAMS

B.

OVERHANGING BEAMS: SINGLE-CANTILEVER BEAMS

C.

OVERHANGING BEAMS: DOUBLE-CANTILEVER BEAMS

2-SPAN CONTINUOUS BEAMS

D.

3-SPAN CONTINUOUS BEAMS

E.

F.

HINGE-CONNECTED BEAMS

G
FIXED BEAMS

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

FLEXURAL SYSTEMS: Column Design

Problem 8: Steel column design

Determine the preliminary size of a W14 (W360) column using A36 (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa
or N/mm2=25kN/cm2), that is 3.66 m long and is not braced about its strong axis, but is
braced about its weak axis and hence does not sway in that direction. The column carries an
axial load of 2224 kN at the top. As a first trial, assume Ky = 1.0 and Kx = 1.5. Use the
AISC-ASD 89 working stress approach.

Manual check of SAP2000 results:

A typical column concentrically loaded by an axial force, P, causes a uniform compressive stress that
should not exceed the allowable axial compressive stress, Fa that is the flexural buckling stress (i.e. critical
stress), Fcr divided by the safety factor c. Hence the required cross-sectional area, Ag, of the section is as
follows,
fa = P/Ag Fa = Fcr/c or

Ag P/Fa

Short columns are prevented from buckling below a slenderness of roughly, Kl/r = 30, for preliminary
design purposes,
Fa = Fcr / c = Fcr/1.67 = 0.6Fcr = 0.6Fy = 0.6(25) = 15 kN/cm2

Long columns fail in elastic buckling above a slenderness of roughly, Kl/r = 126 200, for A36 steel,
Fa = Fcr / c = [ 2E/(Kl/r)2]/1.92 = 102808/(Kl/r)2, where, E = 20000 kN/cm2

Intermediate columns fail in inelastic buckling; for preliminary design purposes assume for
for Fy = 25 kN/cm2:

Fa 15.0 0.06Kl/r

For preliminary estimation purposes, it may be assumed that the braced weak axis controls
the design:
For W14, rrmin 10 cm (4 in),

hence, Fa 15 0.06(1(366/10) = 12.80 kN/cm2

Hence the required cross-sectional area, Ag, of the section is as follows, A = P/Ag = 2224/12.80 = 173.75 cm2

Try W14x99 (W360 x147), A = 187.74 cm2, rmin = 9.44 cm, rmax = 15.69 cm
SAP2000 reports a W14x90 , A = 170.97 cm2, Fa = 13.29 kN/cm2
Check assumption: (KL/r)x = 1.5(366)/15.69 = 34.99, (KL/r)y = 1(366)/9.44 = 38.77 > 34.99 O.K.

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Surface Structures: beam membrane

Problem 13: Beam membrane

A simply supported, 12-m span glulam beam is 1.00 m deep and 15 cm wide. It has the following material
properties for wood:

Weight per unit volume: = 5.50 kN/m3

Mass per unit volume: m = /g = 5.5/9,81 = 0.5606 kg/m3
Modulus of elasticity: E =11000 MPa (N/mm2) = 1100 kN/cm2
Poisson's ratio: = 0.3
Coefficient of thermal expansion: t = 3.78 (10)6 (1/C) = 3.780E-06
Shear modulus: G = 4231 MPa (N/mm2) = 423kN/cm2
Allowable bending stress: Fb = 12.4 MPa = 1.24 kN/cm2
Allowable shear stress: Fv = 1.14MPa (N/mm2) = 0.11 kN/cm2

The beam is modeled using membrane elements as indicated below. Determine how many elements are
required for a sufficiently accurate solution of the stresses. Try,
(a) 24 elements (n = 6 x 4 elements, each one 2.00 x 0.25 m), with an aspect ratio of 8.
(b) 32 elements (n = 8 x 4 elements, each one 1.50 x 0.25 m), with an aspect ratio of 6.
(c) 40 elements (n = 10 x 4 elements, each one 1.20 x 0.25 m), with an aspect ratio of 4.8.
A load of 14 kN/m on top of the beam, which includes the self weight, is transformed into a surface load
applied along the beam membrane: 14/1(1) = 14 kN/m2 = 1.40 N/cm2. Check the maximum bending and
shear stresses manually and compare the values with the S11 (SMAX, SMIN) and S12 computer stress
diagrams. The critical computer results are checked disregarding the precise section properties for glulam
timber.

1m

14 kN/m

12 m

Allowable stresses:
wood: Fb 0.8 kN/cm2 = 8 N/mm2, Fv 0.1 kN/cm2 = 1 N/mm2,
concrete: Fb 1.2 kN/cm2 = 12 N/mm2, Fv 0.05 kN/cm2 = 0.5 N/mm2,
Ft 0.07kN/cm2 = 0.7 N/mm2
Problem 14: Deep beam behavior
Study the beam in Problem 13 further by investigating the following features:
(a) Put holes into the web and study the stress distribution.
(b) Move the right roller support to midspan to obtain a cantilever beam by using the ModelAlive feature.

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Frame Structures: statically indeterminate portals

Problem 19: Introduction to indeterminate portal frames

Investigate a 12-m span, 4.50-m high, rectangular, single-bay, two-hinged portal steel frame with respect
to the effect of indeterminacy, that is, the change of relative member stiffness on the force flow. The
frames are spaced 12 m on center. For the design check of the steel frames use the AISC-ASD 89 working
stress approach as based on A36 steel (Fy = 36 ksi 250 MPa or N/mm2= 25 kN/cm2).
The following roof loads must be supported: 1.20 kN/m2 dead load, 1.44 kN/m2 live load, and 0.81 kN/m2
wind load against the curtain walls. Consider the following load combinations to check the given
sections: COMB1 (D + L), COMB2 (D + W), and COMB3 [D + 0.75(L + W)].
wD = 1.2(12) = 14.40 kN/m, wL = 1.44(12) = 17.28 kN/m, PW = 0.81(12 x 2.25) = 21.87 kN
The columns do not sway about their weak axes (Ky = 1) because the building is laterally braced in the
long direction. The frame naturally sways in the cross direction, where effective length factor Kx 1.0 is
determined by SAP2000 from the stiffness of the members. For the design of the beams, an unbraced
length ratio of Lb /L = 0.1 about the minor axis is used for preliminary design purposes.
(a) Treat the frame as a beam; use W24x76 (W610x113) beams together with W24x94 (W610x140)
columns, where Ib = 0.78Ic, = (Ib/Ic)(Lc/Lb) = 0.78(15/40) = 0.29 0.3
(b) Use a W24x68 (W610x101) beam together with W14x99 (W360x147) columns, where
Ib = 1.65Ic: = 0.62 0.6
(c) Use a W24x84 (W610x125) beam together with W14x90 (W360x134) columns, where
Ib = 2.37Ic: = 0.89 0.9
(d) Use a W24x94 (W610x140) beam together with W14x90 (W360x134) columns, where
Ib = 2.70Ic: = 1.01 1.0

EXPLANATIONS:
The support moment, Ms, in the two-hinged frame is dependent on the stiffness of the beam (EI/L)b and the
column (EI/L)c or for one material (Ec = Eb) on the relative stiffness factors Ib /Lb and Ic /Lc , that is on a
distribution factor, , and is equal to,
MS = (wL2/12)[3/(3+2)]
where, = (I/L)b /(I/L)c = (Ib /Lb)Lc /Ic = n(Lc /Lb),

where Ib = nIc.

For some typical conditions, the support or column moment Ms is,

= 1.0 (i.e., equal beam and column stiffness): Ms =wL2/20
= 0.5:

Ms = wL2/16

= Lc /Lb , say = 0.3:

Ms wL2/14
(e.g., for same column and beam section, possibly braced frame)

Prof. Wolfgang Schueller

Lateral Stability of Building Structures

Problem 22: Eccentrically braced, single-story building

A simple single-story, 4.50-m high building is investigated with respect to lateral load
flow only, disregarding gravity load action. The building consists of six 6.00 x 7.50 m
bays as shown below. A lateral uniform wind pressure of 1 kN/m2 is assumed. Do a
preliminary investigation of the lateral force distribution to the vertical resisting shear
walls or braced frames using default sections in SAP
a) Investigate the asymmetrical lateral-force resisting braced, hinged steel frame
structure in case (a) by using the diaphragm constraint to model the concrete floor.
.
A uniform wind pressure is assumed against the short building faade (WINDY) and
against the long faade (WINDX); but the loads are not treated in combination with each
other. The wind load at the roof level is equal to, 1.00(4.5/2) = 2.25 kN/m. In
other words, use a horizontal uniform line load along the spandrel beams of, 2.25 kN/m.
For the determinate frame structure the frame elements may be modeled by using the
default setting (FSEC1 section), since member stiffness has no effect on the magnitude of
internal member forces; but, do not use deflection results.

4.5 m

a.
7.5 m

7.5 m

6m
6m
6m

b.

c.

d.

b) Investigate the asymmetrical lateral-force resisting braced, hinged frame structure in

case (a), by using a 15-cm thick concrete slab for the roof structure rather than a rigid
plane as based on diaphragm constraint.