Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.1
: 11/12/1995 to
04/04/1996
Position
: Undergraduate Trainee
Supervisor
4 months
: 23/03/1999 to
13/06/1999
Position
: Undergraduate Trainee
Supervisor
: Eng. Herath
2 2/3 months
I was responsible for the following activities together with site supervision at
the above site.
Setting out work of Building
Carry out excavation work according to drawings
Concreting of basement
Labour handling
Preparation of bar schedules
Preparation of variations considering additional works for Engineers
approval
3.2
Position
: Instructor
Supervisor
3 1/3 months
Position
Supervisor
8 2/3 months
I joined the Kajima Kumagai Hazama joint venture (I worked in the kumagai
Gumi Corporation) as a civil Engineer after my tenure at the university. In the
Kukule Ganga Hydropower Project Lot 2.1, was constructed by Kajima
Kumagai Hazama joint venture, who was the main contractor for Civil works
and Diversion facilities. Client of the project was Ceylon Electricity board.
Consulting Engineer was Nippon koei Co.,Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, ElectrowattEkono Ltd, Zurich, Switzerland and Lahmeyer International GMBH,
BadVilbel, Germany.
The main dam at Kukule is a concrete gravity type with sand traps.
Aim of the Project is to generate Hydro-electric power. It comprises of 110 m
long diversion weir, 90 m long sand traps, tunnel intake structures,
reclamation work at head pond areas, connection road between the weir site
and the power house, Control buildings and resettlement houses. Contract
amount was SLR 920 million and JYP 3075 million. Total Project duration
was 4 years.
At the beginning, I was assigned to planning and designing unit of the
KKH office where I was engaged with preparation of Bar schedules as well as
checking the same. KKH JV wanted to design and construct quarters for all
local staff and the responsibility of designing the quarters was assigned to me
in addition to other works. As such I had to allocate my time for design works
of the quarters.
At the design office, I was trained under Eng. I.M Ranjith. As a trainee
design engineer first I studied the drawings, design specifications and method
statements etc. I carried out independent analysis and designs were done as per
to British Standards (BS 8110 part-1~3). I carried out the checking of design
calculations and detail drawings
Initially I referred some specimen designs relevant to the multistoreyed buildings and studied basic principals in designing, Detailing and
standards. For design Bending moment diagrams, shear force diagrams were
developed through structural analysis methods. Minimum reinforcement
requirements, maximum spacing requirements, Deflections checks etc were
adopted as per the base BS 8110. I carried out all calculations manually and
was checked by some structural analysis programmes like Prokon.
I involved in Designing and detailing of slabs, beams, staircases
footings and I experienced in preparation of detailed structural drawings
according to the design office practice directly under the guidance of Design
Eng. I.M Ranjith.
3.2.3
Position
Supervisor
14 1/3 months
Preparing of daily, weekly and monthly machine & manpower list of all
sub contractors. In the daily records, Machine type, purpose, working
hours, and location of work were to be recorded. I had to correct the day
work records submitted by the sub contractors.
I was also responsible for taking the joint measurements with Engineers
staff and prepared measurement sheets to submit for approval. I was the
only responsible Engineer to calculate all the left bank work quantity
measurement sheets. After receiving the approval I prepared the monthly
interim invoice.
3.3
Responsible Experience
3.3.1
Position
: Site Engineer
Supervisor
11 1/2 months
I attended the site meetings and had to report on the progress achieved.
During the site meetings, I discussed the matters which were scheduled to
carry out at the previous meetings. Our attention was drawn to the following
Items, which would affect the future progress.
10
: 01/10/2003 to 30/03/2004
Position
: Project Engineer
Supervisor
11
6 months
12
13
3.3.3
: 01/04/2004 to 07/02/2005
10 months
Position
: Design Engineer
Supervisor
14
drawings including reinforcement details and bar schedules for the structures. I
was responsible getting approval for the structural drawings as well. To date I
have completed about 40 such structures including Box culverts, pipe culverts
head walls and wing walls of culverts and transitions required for the drainage
structures. At present I continue to complete the design works of balanced
structures with the team of Engineers from CECB. As the designs of the
structures done by me being actually constructed at site, the experience I gained
at this present will enhance my design experience as well as my construction
experience.
3.3.4
: 01/04/2004 to 07/02/2005
Position
: Project Engineer
Supervisor
8 months
Establishing the permanent and temporary bench marks ands setting out of
proposed centre line in the carriage way.
15
: 04-10-2005 to to date
Duration : 14 months
Position
Supervisor
Client
Estimated Cost
:-
3,200 m2
16
The above project was undertaken by the CECB as a turnkey project. The
reinforced concrete super structure rested on 32 numbers of cast-in-situ bored
piles. Structural designs were carried out in accordance with BS 8110. Preparation
of layouts and general arrangement drawings, Analysis, Design and Preparation of
drawings were carried out. The main structural components were Pile Caps
(single & double), Under Ground Water Sump, Over head Water Tank, Lift
wells(2 Nos.), BeamColumns grid frames, Roof and Floor Slabs and Staircases
(3 Nos.). During the course of work, I had an opportunity to communicate with
professionals in different disciplines such as architects, Service engineers,
Electrical and Mechanical engineers etc. One of my duties were to conduct site
meetings, site work inspections and to give instructions/ clarifications regarding
construction drawings.
Registrar General Building is the one of the largest building projects that
CECB undertook on a turnkey basis. I was responsible for the design and
participating in site visits as a consultant Engineer. There, I had an opportunity to
work under Eng. G. D. A. Piyatilaka who was the Acting General Manager in
Colombo region, CECB. I was also supposed to give necessary instructions on
quality control work and progress as mentioned above.
1. Checking of reinforcement arrangement according to the structural drawings.
2. Supervision of form works. It was necessary to study all engineering and
architectural drawings before the commencement of formworks. Ducts had to
be provided specially for electrical wiring, water supply and fire fighting.
Continuous coordination with personnel pertaining to other engineering
disciplines and architects was necessary.
17
Site was very congested with the site office, stores, labour huts and working
areas. The problems arose were easily solved by managing the work with
efficient
labour handling, keeping the site clean and safe and maintaining
adequate stocks. It was observed that there was debris everywhere in the site
and removed formwork material was not placed properly. I drew the attention
of site staff of the situation and made arrangements to remove all debris daily
and to place formwork in an orderly manner after use.
After setting out was done it was observed that setting out points get
disappeared when work was being progressed. Due to this it was difficulty to
check it again. To overcome this, parallel lines 1 m distances away from centre
lines were set out as reference line.
During the excavation for manholes for waste water and sewer lines, large tree
roots and large rocks were observed. Engineer wanted to cut the tree roots and
blast the rocks. But I diverted the waste water and sewer line direction. Then I
managed to achieve the target without cutting tree roots and rock blasting.
Finally Engineer also agreed to my proposal. But we had to construct 2
18
additional man holes. Although it affected the BOQ quantities, Engineer was
made to agree through negotiations.
After removal, the slab formwork were scattered everywhere at the site, some
formwork damaged. I arranged to stack the ply-woods according to their sizes
and to transport them to other sites for reuse.
Due to high water table at the CEB dormitory site, Lots of problems were
faced while excavating and concreting. The soil Engineers recommendation
was to place the raft foundation at 1 m depth on a firm soil base. On my
instructions 10 Nos dewatering pits were excavated around the foundation and
at the same time foundation excavation work carried out simultaneously with
dewatering. Some times small submersible pumps were used.
Since the building was targeted to complete within six months period, I had to
plan the work carefully. I did control and advised sub contractors to work
properly by way of allocating correct person to do the specified job within a
given time schedule. Further I recorded daily balance work remaining with
priority order. It helps me to arrange the daily work programme and update it.
19
Site located some distance away form the main road, and was in the Telecom
building premises. Telecom higher management did not allow entering site
Lorries, Tractors, Water bouzers through this premises. So I had to face severe
problems. Each and every material had to be carried by hands. Due to this
phenomenas, I was unable to carry on site work, according to schedules. I
communicated in writing with Deputy General Manager Telecom on this
matter and I was able to overcome the problem through his kind permission to
use the premises.
1st floor slab was concreted by using pump cars and 6 m 3, 8 m3 capacity
agitator trucks. Concreting was done during the night hours. Due to excessive
truck weight, most of the Telecom roads were damaged and Telecom
prohibited truck movements. Then I understood it will definitely affect the
20
Due to non availability of batching plants in Kurunegala, the site staff was
faced with the problem of formation of cold joints during large pours of
concreting. To overcome this problem, I planned and implemented several
mixers at the same time with suitable pouring patterns to avoid formation of
cold joints. With my instructions they carried out concreting work
satisfactorily.
4.1
1.
We were all newcomers to the site and its location and while installing the
TBMS, we had to clear/cut some small tree branches in the Badagamuwa
reservation. One day a forest officer suddenly came to the site and requested that
we stop our work. This happened after 4 days of commencement of the works.
After that I had to meet the chief forest officer in Kurunegala and discuss what
happened in the site and obtain permission to continue our work.
2.
During the setting out work, one of the surveying personnel fell into the
obsolete pit and fractured his foot, at the same time completely damaging the
leveling instrument. The injured person was taken to hospital and the
incidente was communicated to the head office, requesting another instrument
for carrying out the work. The damaged instrument was sent to Boomtech
Pvt Ltd for repair.
3.
It was noticed that every morning and evening there was a time period (about
30 minutes) lost in adhering to the stores procedures in issuing and receiving
21
tools such as concrete pans, mamoties, wheelbarrows etc. All labourers were
idling during that time. To solve the problem I proposed that the storekeeper
should issue the required tools to the relevant team leader/Foreman with a
guarantee that they would be received at the completion of the work. I was
able to recover the time loss due to bad weather.
4.
I observed that the curing had not been properly carried out. I allocated a
separate worker with necessary instructions to look into curing work.
5.
There had been so many cases of damaging Hume pipes due to improper
handling. I looked into that and arranged a special tool along with a list of
instructions to lift the Hume pipe.
6.
Material wastage was a severe problem in the site. During the rainy days, part
of the sand piles were washed away. I gave instructions to cover the piles
during the rainy days. A more suitable location at the site premises was
selected to store materials.
7.
I pay keen attention to select a land to use as a yard. I proposed that it should
be very close to the site to reduce traveling time.
8.
4.2
22
positions and the sizes of cable trenches. However at the design stage those
details were not available. So I sent letters requesting for them. It was obvious
that any delay would affect our construction program. Therefore I proposed two
duct positions to fulfill the requirements.
2. Since architect drawings were not finalized, I started my design calculation
using information only drawings. Later the architect changed his Information
only drawings significantly. I had to check my previous calculations.
3. At the initial stage I did not have an overall picture of the building and also no
proper coordination of the Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing engineers etc. So I
had to change my concrete outline drawings and reinforcement drawings.
4. Some details were missed. For instance, installing the water bar mark and the
construction joints locations. When the resident Engineer called and asked about
this, I consulted with my senior engineers to give an exact answer.
5. Sump concreting had not been done properly. Advice had to be given to them to
do remedial measures and to check for any leakages after repairs.
6. Some pile cap starters were not perpendicular to the surface of the pile cap. That
made it impossible to maintain verticality of the column. I had to advice them to
drill the pile cap to a 450 mm depth and embed the same diameter bars in the
same locations.
7. Curing was not properly done after concreting. I highlighted its importance and
sent a letter through my in- charge.
23