Professional Documents
Culture Documents
original article
A BS T R AC T
BACKGROUND
From the Department of Pediatrics, The efficacy of antimicrobial treatment in children with acute otitis media remains
Turku University Hospital (P.A.T., M.K.L., controversial.
O.R., A.R.), the Division of Health Protec-
tion, National Institute for Health and Wel-
fare (P.H., J.J.), and the Department of
METHODS
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, In this randomized, double-blind trial, children 6 to 35 months of age with acute
University of Turku (P.H.) all in Turku, otitis media, diagnosed with the use of strict criteria, received amoxicillinclavula-
Finland. Address reprint requests to Dr.
Ruohola at the Department of Pediatrics, nate (161 children) or placebo (158 children) for 7 days. The primary outcome was
Turku University Hospital, PL 52 FIN- the time to treatment failure from the first dose until the end-of-treatment visit on
20521, Turku, Finland, or at aino.ruohola@ day 8. The definition of treatment failure was based on the overall condition of the
utu.fi.
child (including adverse events) and otoscopic signs of acute otitis media.
N Engl J Med 2011;364:116-26.
Copyright 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. RESULTS
Treatment failure occurred in 18.6% of the children who received amoxicillin
clavulanate, as compared with 44.9% of the children who received placebo (P<0.001).
The difference between the groups was already apparent at the first scheduled visit
(day 3), at which time 13.7% of the children who received amoxicillinclavulanate,
as compared with 25.3% of those who received placebo, had treatment failure. Over-
all, amoxicillinclavulanate reduced the progression to treatment failure by 62%
(hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001) and the
need for rescue treatment by 81% (6.8% vs. 33.5%; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10
to 0.36; P<0.001). Analgesic or antipyretic agents were given to 84.2% and 85.9% of
the children in the amoxicillinclavulanate and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse
events were significantly more common in the amoxicillinclavulanate group than
in the placebo group. A total of 47.8% of the children in the amoxicillinclavulanate
group had diarrhea, as compared with 26.6% in the placebo group (P<0.001); 8.7%
and 3.2% of the children in the respective groups had eczema (P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
Children with acute otitis media benefit from antimicrobial treatment as compared
with placebo, although they have more side effects. Future studies should identify
patients who may derive the greatest benefit, in order to minimize unnecessary
antimicrobial treatment and the development of bacterial resistance. (Funded by
the Foundation for Paediatric Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number,
NCT00299455.)
A
cute otitis media is the most com- following acute inflammatory signs in the tym-
mon bacterial infection during early child- panic membrane had to be present: distinct ery-
hood.1 Antimicrobial agents have been the thematous patches or streaks or increased vascu- Comment on
this article at
primary treatment for this infection since the larity over full, bulging, or yellow tympanic NEJM.org
1950s, when the first studies showed that anti- membrane. Third, the child had to have acute
microbial therapy improved the outcome.2,3 Nev- symptoms, such as fever, ear pain, or respiratory
ertheless, there is no consensus regarding the symptoms. A parent of each child provided written
optimal management of acute otitis media.1 Be- informed consent. The protocol, which is available
cause the treatment of acute otitis media is a ma- at NEJM.org, was approved by the ethics commit-
jor reason for the use of antimicrobial agents in the tee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland.
outpatient setting, experts have called for these The authors vouch for the accuracy and com-
agents to be used judiciously.4,5 Several guidelines pleteness of the reported data and the fidelity of
for the management of acute otitis media recom- this report to the study protocol.
mend an observation period before antimicrobial
therapy is even considered.6-10 These recommen- Study Design
dations are based largely on meta-analyses that This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-
concluded that for 1 child to have relief of symp- trolled study that was initiated by the investigators
toms, 7 to 17 children must be treated with anti- and was conducted independently of any commer-
microbial agents.11-15 However, some experts have cial entities. Our objective was to study the effi-
suggested that the original studies included in the cacy of antimicrobial treatment with respect to the
meta-analyses had important limitations, such as resolution of symptoms and signs of acute otitis
biases in patient selection, varying diagnostic cri- media. The hypothesis was that amoxicillinclavu-
teria, and suboptimal spectrum or dosage of an- lanate would reduce the risk of treatment failure.
timicrobial agents.1,16-20 At the enrollment visit (day 1), the patients
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, symptoms, medical history, and demographic and
placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of anti- clinical characteristics were recorded, a nasopha-
microbial therapy in the age group with the high- ryngeal sample was obtained, and a clinical ex-
est incidence of acute otitis media. Our aim was amination was performed that included thorough
to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment otoscopic and tympanometric examinations. De-
for acute otitis media when strict diagnostic cri- tails of nasopharyngeal sampling, bacterial cultur-
teria are used and the antimicrobial coverage and ing, analyses of resistance of the bacteria to anti-
dosage of the active treatment are adequate. microbial agents, and otoscopic examinations are
provided in the Supplementary Appendix.
Me thods Eligible patients were randomly assigned to re-
ceive amoxicillinclavulanate (40 mg of amoxicil-
Patients and Diagnostic Criteria lin per kilogram of body weight per day plus
Children 6 to 35 months of age with acute symp- 5.7 mg of clavulanate per kilogram per day, divid-
toms were eligible for our diagnostic screening. A ed into two daily doses) or placebo for 7 days. The
list of the exclusion criteria, along with descrip- placebo was similar to the active treatment in
tions and explanations, is provided in the Supple- appearance and taste. (For a description of the
mentary Appendix, available with the full text of study drugs, the randomization procedure, and the
this article at NEJM.org. Children in whom acute procedure for concealment of study assignments,
otitis media was diagnosed per protocol were eli- see the Supplementary Appendix.) Parents were
gible for inclusion in the study. Three overall crite- given a diary and were asked to record symptoms, Videos showing
ria were required for the diagnosis of acute otitis doses of study drugs and any other medications, otoscopic signs of
media (see videos 1, 2, and 3). First, middle-ear absenteeism of the child from day care and of acute otitis media
are available at
fluid had to be detected by means of pneumatic the parent from work, and adverse events. Fever NEJM.org
otoscopic examination that showed at least two was defined as a body temperature of 38C or
of the following tympanic-membrane findings: higher. We encouraged the use of analgesic and
bulging position, decreased or absent mobility, antipyretic agents and allowed the use of anal-
abnormal color or opacity not due to scarring, or gesic ear drops and decongestant nose drops or
airfluid interfaces. Second, at least one of the sprays.
The first visit after the enrollment visit was The secondary outcomes, which were assessed
scheduled for 2 days after the initiation of the by the study physician, were the time to the ini-
study drug (day 3). The end-of-treatment visit was tiation of rescue treatment and the development
scheduled for the day after the last dose of study of contralateral acute otitis media. Data on the
drug was administered (i.e., on day 8). At that use of analgesic or antipyretic agents, absentee-
visit, diaries and used and unused study-drug cap- ism of the child from day care and of the parent
sules were returned, and adherence to the study from work, and the resolution of each symptom
drug was estimated. Parents were told to contact were based on recordings in the diary. The treat-
a study physician whenever they thought that their ment result, as of the end-of-treatment visit, was
childs condition had not improved satisfactorily based on the parents assessment of the childs
or had worsened; an additional visit was arranged overall condition as reported to the study physi-
on any day of the week. Whenever possible, the cian and on the otoscopic signs. Adverse events
same study physician examined the patient at were ascertained from entries by the parents in
consecutive visits. At each visit, the study physi- the diary and from reports by the study physicians
cian first asked the parents for their assessment after they questioned the parents.
of their childs overall condition, which was re-
corded as healthy, better, no improvement, or Statistical Analysis
worse. The child was then examined by the phy- We estimated that with 260 patients, the study
sician. At any visit, the physician could switch from would have 90% power to detect an absolute re-
the study drug to rescue treatment if the childs duction of 15 percentage points in the rate of
overall condition or otoscopic signs warranted the treatment failure in the amoxicillinclavulanate
change (see the Supplementary Appendix). Parents group as compared with the placebo group, as-
were encouraged to keep their children in the suming a 25% rate of treatment failure in the
study for follow-up assessments even if they had placebo group, with a type I error of 0.05. We
discontinued the study drug. planned to enroll 320 patients to account for a
possible 20% rate of withdrawal from the study.
Outcomes The KaplanMeier method was used to analyze
The primary outcome was the time to treatment time-to-event data with the use of the log-rank
failure, which was a composite outcome consist- test; hazard ratios and confidence intervals were
ing of six independent components: no improve- calculated on the basis of a Cox regression model.
ment in overall condition by the first scheduled Categorical outcomes were compared with the use
visit (day 3) (i.e., unless parents thought that their of the chi-square test. Students t-test was used to
childs overall condition was improving, the case compare means. Absolute percentage-point differ-
was categorized as treatment failure), a worsening ences in rates and 95% confidence intervals are
of the childs overall condition at any time, no provided.
improvement in otoscopic signs by the end-of- All analyses were performed on data from the
treatment visit on day 8 (see videos 4 through 8), intention-to-treat population. All reported P val-
perforation of the tympanic membrane at any ues are two-sided and have not been adjusted for
time, severe infection (e.g., mastoiditis or pneu- multiple testing. All analyses were performed with
monia) necessitating systemic open-label antimi- the use of SPSS software, version 16.0.
crobial treatment at any time, and any other rea-
son for stopping the study drug (e.g., an adverse R e sult s
event or nonadherence to the study drug) at any
time. The time of treatment failure was the study Study Patients
day on which the study physician confirmed any The intention-to-treat population comprised 319
one of the components for the first time. Several patients 161 in the amoxicillinclavulanate
components could be confirmed concurrently, but group and 158 in the placebo group (Fig. 1 and
this was not a requirement. The first two compo- Table 1). The rate of adherence to the study drug
nents were based on the parents assessment of was approximately 94% as assessed according
their childs overall condition, including adverse to diary entries and approximately 99% as as-
events (healthy, better, no improvement, or worse) sessed according to the amount of returned study
as reported to the study physician; the other four drugs, with no significant differences between
components were assessed by the study physician. the groups.
162 Were assigned to receive amoxicillinclavulanate 160 Were assigned to receive placebo
1 Withdrew on day 1
161 Were included in the analysis (1 was included 158 Were included in the analysis (1 was included
until withdrawn by parent on day 3) until withdrawn by parent on day 3)
Primary Outcome nate group and 25.3% in the placebo group had
Treatment failure occurred in 30 of the 161 chil- treatment failure. The separation between the
dren (18.6%) who received amoxicillinclavulanate curves continued to widen during the subsequent
and in 71 of the 158 children (44.9%) who received follow-up and peaked at the end-of-treatment visit
placebo (P<0.001). The KaplanMeier analysis on day 8. Overall, amoxicillinclavulanate reduced
showed that a separation between the curves for the risk of treatment failure by 62% (hazard ratio,
the two groups was already apparent at the first 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.59;
scheduled visit, on day 3 (Fig. 2A). At that time, P<0.001). To avoid treatment failure in 1 child,
13.7% of the children in the amoxicillinclavula- 3.8 children (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.2) needed to be
* Data were missing for three patients in the amoxicillinclavulanate group and two patients in the placebo group.
Data were missing for two patients in the amoxicillinclavulanate group and two patients in the placebo group, in
whom an adequate view of the contralateral tympanic membrane was not possible owing to thick cerumen.
All strains were susceptible to amoxicillinclavulanate.
Strains with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin were detected in 18 samples in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group
and 21 samples in the placebo group. In the amoxicillinclavulanate group, one strain of S. pneumoniae was fully resis-
tant to penicillin.
Treatment (%)
30
3, and Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix). Placebo
Contralateral acute otitis media developed in
20
13 of the 159 children in the amoxicillinclavu-
lanate group (8.2%) and 29 of the 156 children
10
in the placebo group (18.6%) for whom data were
Amoxicillinclavulanate
available (P=0.007) (Fig. 3). There was no signifi- 0
cant between-group difference in the use of an- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
algesic or antipyretic agents (Fig. 3). Among the Study Day
children who received analgesic or antipyretic No. at Risk
agents, the mean duration of treatment was 3.6 Amoxicillinclavulanate 161 160 152 150 150 150 150 149
Placebo 158 156 129 126 121 119 118 104
days and 3.4 days in the amoxicillinclavulanate
and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.45). Absen- Figure 2. KaplanMeier Curves for the Time to Treatment Failure
teeism from day care was reported for 107 of 672 and Rescue Treatment.
follow-up days (15.9%) among day-care attendees KaplanMeier curves are shown for the time to treatment failure (Panel A)
in the amoxicillinclavulanate group and for 144 and the time to rescue treatment (Panel B). The time to treatment failure,
of 568 follow-up days (25.4%) among day-care which was the primary composite outcome, consisted of six independent
attendees in the placebo group (a reduction of 9.4 components: no improvement in overall condition by the first scheduled
visit (day 3); a worsening of the childs overall condition at any time; no im-
percentage points with amoxicillinclavulanate; provement in otoscopic signs by the end-of-treatment visit (day 8); perfora-
95% CI, 13.9 to 4.9; P<0.001). Parents of day- tion of the tympanic membrane at any time; severe infection necessitating
care attendees in the amoxicillinclavulanate open-label systemic antimicrobial treatment at any time; and any other rea-
group missed significantly fewer workdays than son for stopping the study drug at any time. Only the first event in an indi-
did parents of day-care attendees in the placebo vidual patient was included in the analysis of the primary outcome.
group (81 days [12.1%] vs. 101 days [17.8%], a
reduction of 5.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 9.7 not improved or had worsened in 11 children
to 1.8; P=0.005). (6.8%) in the amoxicillinclavulanate group, as
At the end-of-treatment visit, there was a sig- compared with 47 children (29.7%) in the placebo
nificantly better treatment result with respect to group (22.9 percentage points less with amoxi-
both overall condition and otoscopic signs with cillinclavulanate; 95% CI, 31.4 to 14.4). Oto-
amoxicillinclavulanate than with placebo (P<0.001 scopic signs had not improved or had worsened
for both outcomes) (Fig. 4). Overall condition had in 8 children (5.0%) and 60 children (38.0%) in
Amoxicillin
Clavulanate Placebo
(N=161) (N=158) Absolute Percentage-Point Difference (95% CI)
no.(%)
Primary Outcome
Treatment failure 30 (18.6) 71 (44.9) 26.3 (36.5 to 16.1)
No improvement in overall condition by day 3 12 (7.5) 22 (13.9) 6.5 (13.2 to 0.3)
Worsening of overall condition at any time 15 (9.3) 32 (20.3) 10.9 (18.7 to 3.2)
No improvement in otoscopic signs by day 8 1 (0.6) 16 (10.1) 9.5 (14.4 to 4.6)
Perforation of tympanic membrane at any time 1 (0.6) 5 (3.2) 2.5 (5.5 to 0.4)
Severe infection at any time 0 2 (1.3) 1.3 (3.0 to 0.5)
Any reason to stop the study drug at any time 2 (1.2) 3 (1.9) 0.7 (3.4 to 2.1)
Secondary Outcome
Rescue treatment 11 (6.8) 53 (33.5) 26.7 (35.5 to 17.9)
Contralateral acute otitis media 13 (8.2) 29 (18.6) 10.4 (17.9 to 2.9)
Use of analgesic or antipyretic agents 133 (84.2) 134 (85.9) 1.7 (9.6 to 6.2)
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40
Amoxicillin Placebo
Clavulanate Better Better
Figure 3. Absolute Differences between the AmoxicillinClavulanate and Placebo Groups in Cumulative Rates of Primary and Secondary
Outcomes.
In the analysis of the primary outcome, a patient was counted only once, on the study day on which any one of the six independent com-
ponents of treatment failure was first confirmed. In a separate, secondary analysis of the cumulative incidence of each component of the
primary outcome, a patient could be included in more than one component category if the components were confirmed by the study
physician at the same time. For the secondary outcome of contralateral acute otitis media, data were missing for two children in each
group; for the outcome of use of analgesic or antipyretic agents, data were missing for three children in the amoxicillinclavulanate
group and two children in the placebo group.
the amoxicillinclavulanate and placebo groups, reported by parents, ear pain as reported by the
respectively (a decrease of 33.0 percentage points children, ear rubbing, restless sleep, or excessive
with amoxicillinclavulanate; 95% CI, 42.0 to crying (Fig. 2 in the Supplementary Appendix).
24.0). In 1 child (0.6%) in the amoxicillinclavu- After the end of the study-treatment period,
lanate group and 10 children (6.3%) in the pla- children who had received amoxicillinclavulanate
cebo group, both overall condition and oto- had less pathogenic bacteria in the nasopharynx
scopic signs had worsened (a decrease of 5.7 than did children who had received placebo (Ta-
percentage points with amoxicillinclavulanate; ble 4 in the Supplementary Appendix). However,
95% CI, 9.7 to 1.7), whereas 13 children antimicrobial resistance was identified from the
(8.1%) in the amoxicillinclavulanate group and nasopharyngeal samples of one child in the amox-
4 (2.5%) in the placebo group were completely icillinclavulanate group. On study days 1 and 8,
healthy with respect to overall condition and we detected an isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae
otoscopic signs (an increase of 5.5 percentage that first showed intermediate resistance and later
points with amoxicillinclavulanate; 95% CI, 0.6 showed full resistance to penicillin.
to 10.5).
Treatment with amoxicillinclavulanate signifi- Adverse Events
cantly accelerated the resolution of fever, poor An adverse event occurred in 85 children (52.8%)
appetite, decreased activity, and irritability. The in the amoxicillinclavulanate group and in 57
effect of treatment on the resolution of fever was children (36.1%) in the placebo group (an increase
already seen 6 hours after the first dose had been of 16.7 percentage points with amoxicillinclavu-
administered, and the effect on the resolution of lanate; 95% CI, 5.8 to 27.6; P=0.003) (Table 2).
the symptoms of poor appetite, decreased activ- There were no cases of mastoiditis. Two children in
ity, and irritability was seen on the second study the placebo group had severe infection one had
day. There was no significant effect of amoxicil- pneumococcal bacteremia and the other had radio-
linclavulanate on the resolution of ear pain as graphically confirmed pneumonia. The most com-
122 n engl j med 364;2 nejm.org january 13, 2011
No. of Patients
Healthy Better
100 91 100
Completely resolved
79
80 80
P<0.001 P<0.001
60 60
40 55 40
20 20 34
20 19
0 0
Amoxicillin Placebo Amoxicillin Placebo
Clavulanate (N=158) Clavulanate (N=158)
(N=161) (N=161)
Figure 4. Childs Overall Condition and Otoscopic Signs at the End of Treatment.
The childs overall condition at the end-of-treatment visit (day 8), as compared with the first visit, was assessed by
the parents (Panel A). Otoscopic signs at the end-of-treatment visit (day 8), as compared with the first visit, were as-
sessed by a study physician (Panel B). In the case of children who either received rescue treatment (49 children) or
discontinued the study (2 children) before the end-of-treatment visit, the treatment result was carried forward from
that time to the end-of-treatment visit on day 8.
mon adverse event was diarrhea, which affected 77 Nonetheless, amoxicillinclavulanate significant-
children (47.8%) in the amoxicillinclavulanate ly reduced two components worsening of the
group and 42 (26.6%) in the placebo group (an in- childs overall condition and lack of improvement
crease of 21.2 percentage points with amoxicillin in otoscopic signs as well as the combined oc-
clavulanate; 95% CI, 10.6 to 31.9). No watery or currence of perforations of the tympanic mem-
bloody diarrhea was reported, and diarrhea did brane and severe infections.
not result in discontinuation of the study drug. Antimicrobial treatment had a more beneficial
Eczema was significantly more common in the effect on acute otitis media in our study than in
amoxicillinclavulanate group than in the placebo previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-
group. Children with severe infections and perfora- trolled studies.21-30 Previous studies have shown
tions of the tympanic membrane were given rescue that the higher the failure rate is in the placebo
treatment. All other adverse events resolved spon- group, the more antimicrobial treatment is shown
taneously by the end-of-treatment visit (day 8), ex- to be superior. In a study by Kaleida et al.,26
cept in three children with diarrhea in each group failure rates in the placebo group were 8%
and in one child in the placebo group in whom ex- among patients who were not severely ill and
anthema developed on day 8 and lasted for 4 days. 24% among those who were severely ill, and the
respective absolute differences in failure rates
Discussion between the antimicrobial-therapy group and the
placebo group were 4 percentage points and 12
Our study shows that amoxicillinclavulanate is percentage points, respectively. In the placebo
superior to placebo for the treatment of acute oti- group in our study, the failure rate was even
tis media. The primary outcome, the time to higher 44.9%, with a 26-percentage-point dif-
treatment failure, incorporated six independent ference between the groups. The number needed
components, including acute symptoms and oto- to treat for 1 child to benefit from antimicrobial
scopic signs that are required for the diagnosis of therapy, as calculated on the basis of the results
acute otitis media. Moreover, our composite out- of our study, is 3.8, as compared with 7 to 17 on
come measured the net effect of the treatment, the basis of the meta-analyses.11-15,31,32 A marked
because the assessment of the childs overall con- difference between the amoxicillinclavulanate
dition included adverse events. This study was not group and the placebo group was also seen in
powered to assess the effect of treatment on each the need for rescue treatment. Rescue treatment
component of the composite primary outcome. was initiated in the children receiving antimi-
References
1. Vergison A, Dagan R, Arguedas A, et committee on Management of Acute Oti- design and conduct of clinical trials in
al. Otitis media and its consequences: be- tis Media. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J
yond the earache. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; acute otitis media. Pediatrics 2004;113: 2002;21:894-902.
10:195-203. 1451-65. 18. Marchant CD. Acute otitis media, an-
2. Lahikainen E. Clinico-bacteriologic 9. Forgie S, Zhanel G, Robinson J. Man- tibiotics, children and clinical trial de-
studies on acute otitis media: aspiration agement of acute otitis media. Paediatr sign. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:891-3.
of tympanum as diagnostic and therapeu- Child Health 2009;14:457-64. 19. Pichichero ME, Casey JR. Diagnostic
tic method. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1953; 10. Marchisio P, Bellussi L, Di Mauro G, inaccuracy and subject exclusions render
107:1-82. et al. Acute otitis media: from diagnosis placebo and observational studies of acute
3. Rudberg RD. Acute otitis media: com- to prevention summary of the Italian otitis media inconclusive. Pediatr Infect
parative therapeutic results of sulphon- guideline. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Dis J 2008;27:958-62.
amide and penicillin administered in vari- 2010;74:1209-16. 20. Idem. Comparison of study designs for
ous forms. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1954; 11. Rosenfeld RM, Vertrees JE, Carr J, et al. acute otitis media trials. Int J Pediatr Oto-
113:1-79. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs rhinolaryngol 2008;72:737-50.
4. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, for acute otitis media: metaanalysis of 21. Halsted C, Lepow ML, Balassanian N,
Gerber MA, Schwartz B. Otitis media 5400 children from thirty-three random- Emmerich J, Wolinsky E. Otitis media:
principles of judicious use of antimicro- ized trials. J Pediatr 1994;124:355-67. clinical observations, microbiology, and
bial agents. Pediatrics 1998;101:Suppl: 12. Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Hayem M. Are evaluation of therapy. Am J Dis Child
165-71. antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for 1968;115:542-51.
5. Rautakorpi UM, Klaukka T, Honk- children with acute otitis media? A meta- 22. Mygind N, Meistrup-Larsen KI, Thom-
anen P, et al. Antibiotic use by indication: analysis. BMJ 1997;314:1526-9. sen J, Thomsen VF, Josefsson K, Srensen
a basis for active antibiotic policy in the 13. Marcy M, Takata G, Chan LS, et al. H. Penicillin in acute otitis media: a dou-
community. Scand J Infect Dis 2001; Management of acute otitis media. Evid ble-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin
33:920-6. Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2000;15:1-4. Otolaryngol 1981;6:5-13.
6. Appelman CL, van Balen FA, van de 14. Rovers MM, Glasziou P, Appelman 23. van Buchem FL, Dunk JH, vant Hof
Lisdonk EH, van Weert HC, Eizenga WH. CL, et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis me- MA. Therapy of acute otitis media: myrin-
NHG Practice Guideline: acute otitis me- dia: a meta-analysis with individual pa- gotomy, antibiotics, or neither? A double-
dia. Huisarts Wet 1990;33:242-5. (In Dutch.) tient data. Lancet 2006;368:1429-35. blind study in children. Lancet 1981;2:
(http://www.artsennet.nl/Richtlijnen/ 15. Sanders S, Glasziou PP, Del Mar C, 883-7.
Richtlijn/Otitis-media-acuta-bij-kinderen- Rovers MM. Antibiotics for acute otitis 24. Thalin A, Densert O, Larsson A, Lyden
2.htm.) media in children. Cochrane Database E, Ripa T. Is penicillin necessary in the
7. Bain J, Townsley P, Boyle K, et al. Di- Syst Rev 2010;1:CD000219. treatment of acute otitis media? In: Pro-
agnosis and management of childhood 16. Bain J. Treatment of acute otitis me- ceedings of the International Conference
otitis media in primary care: guideline dia: are children entered into clinical tri- on Acute and Secretory Otitis Media, Part 1,
no. 66. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercolle- als representative? Br J Gen Pract 2001; Jerusalem, Israel, November 1722, 1985:
giate Guidelines Network, 2003. 51:132-3. 441-6.
8. American Academy of Pediatrics Sub- 17. Dagan R, McCracken GH Jr. Flaws in 25. Engelhard D, Cohen D, Strauss N,
Sacks TG, Jorczak-Sarni L, Shapiro M. DE, Kazantzi MS, Kapaskelis AM, Falagas JH. Correlation between bacteriologic and
Randomised study of myringotomy, amoxy- ME. Antibiotics versus placebo or watch- clinical endpoints in trials of acute otitis
cillin/clavulanate, or both for acute otitis ful waiting for acute otitis media: a meta- media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:936-7.
media in infants. Lancet 1989;2:141-3. analysis of randomized controlled trials. 39. Schaad UB. Correlation between bac-
26. Kaleida PH, Casselbrant ML, Rockette J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;64:16-24. teriologic eradication and clinical cure in
HE, et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy or 32. Coker TR, Chan LS, Newberry SJ, et acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J
both for acute otitis media: results of a al. Diagnosis, microbial epidemiology, 2004;23:281-2.
randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 1991; and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis 40. Toikka P, Virkki R, Mertsola J, Ashorn
87:466-74. media in children: a systematic review. P, Eskola J, Ruuskanen O. Bacteremic
27. Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dun- JAMA 2010;304:2161-9. pneumococcal pneumonia in children.
leavey J. Acute red ear in children: con- 33. Hendley JO. Otitis media. N Engl J Med Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:568-72.
trolled trial of non-antibiotic treatment in 2002;347:1169-74. 41. Juvn T, Mertsola J, Waris M, Lei-
general practice. BMJ 1991;303:558-62. 34. Rovers MM, Schilder AG, Zielhuis GA, nonen M, Ruuskanen O. Clinical response
28. Appelman CL, Claessen JQ, Touw- Rosenfeld RM. Otitis media. Lancet 2004; to antibiotic therapy for community-
Otten FW, Hordijk GJ, de Melker RA. Co- 363:465-73. [Erratum, Lancet 2004;363: acquired pneumonia. Eur J Pediatr 2004;
amoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis media: 1080.] 163:140-4.
placebo controlled study. BMJ 1991;303: 35. Del Beccaro MA, Mendelman PM, In- 42. Ruohola A, Heikkinen T, Meurman O,
1450-2. glis AF, et al. Bacteriology of acute otitis Puhakka T, Lindblad N, Ruuskanen O. Anti-
29. Damoiseaux RA, van Balen FA, Hoes media: a new perspective. J Pediatr 1992; biotic treatment of acute otorrhea through
AW, Verheij TJ, de Melker RA. Primary 120:81-4. tympanostomy tube: randomized double-
care based randomised, double blind trial 36. Ruohola A, Meurman O, Nikkari S, et blind placebo-controlled study with daily
of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute oti- al. Microbiology of acute otitis media in follow-up. Pediatrics 2003;111:1061-7.
tis media in children aged under 2 years. children with tympanostomy tubes: prev- 43. Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Kaleida PH,
BMJ 2000;320:350-4. alences of bacteria and viruses. Clin In- Ploof DL, Paradise JL. Diagnosing otitis
30. Le Saux N, Gaboury I, Baird M, et al. fect Dis 2006;43:1417-22. media otoscopy and cerumen removal.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo- 37. Laine MK, Thtinen PA, Ruuskanen N Engl J Med 2010;362(20):e62. (Available
controlled noninferiority trial of amoxi- O, Huovinen P, Ruohola A. Symptoms or at NEJM.org.)
cillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis symptom-based scores cannot predict Copyright 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society.
media in children 6 months to 5 years of acute otitis media at otitis-prone age. Pe-
age. CMAJ 2005;172:335-41. diatrics 2010;125(5):e1154-e1161.
31. Vouloumanou EK, Karageorgopoulos 38. Johann-Liang R, Zalkikar J, Powers