Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
American Philosophical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST CHAIN REACTING PILE
ENRICO FERMI
(Read November 17, 1945, in the Symposium on Atomic Energy and its Implications)
IT has been known for many years that vast are capable of producing new reactions. One can
amounts of energy are stored in the nuclei of many then conceive the possibility that when a first re-
atomic species and that their release is not in action takes place the particles produced by it may
contradiction with the principle of the conserva- have a sufficient activity to determine in the
tion of energy nor with any other of the accepted average more than one similar reaction. When
basic laws of physics. In spite of this recognized this is the case in each "generation" the number
fact, it was the general opinion among physicists of reacting nuclei increases until the process
until recently that a large scale release of the "burns" a sizable fraction of the original material.
nuclear energy would not be possible without the Whether the chain reaction develops or not de-
discovery of some new phenomenon. pends on whether the number of new processes
The reasons for this somewhat negative atti- produced by the particles emitted by a first process
tude were the following: Two types of processes is larger or smaller than one. This number is
in which nuclear energy could be released might called "reproduction factor."
be considered in principle. Various nuclear re- For all processes known until the discovery of
actions take place spontaneously with production fission early in 1939, however, the reproduction
of energy when two nuclei are brought in contact. factor was in all cases enormously smaller than
The simplest of many possible examples is per- one. The fission process opened a new way.
haps that of ordinary hydrogen. Two hydrogen Almost immediately after the announcement of
nuclei when brought in contact are spontaneously the discovery the possibility was discussed that
capable of reacting forming a deuterium nucleus when the two fragments separate they may be
and emitting an electron. The energy liberated excited so highly that neutrons may "evaporate"
in this process is about 1.4 Mev per process, out of them. This conjecture was soon confirmed
equivalent to 1.6 x 1010 calories per gram or by experimental observations on both sides of the
about two million times the combustion energy Atlantic.
of
an equal amount of coal. The reason why hy- In the spring of 1939 it was generally known
drogen is not a nuclear explosive is that two that a fission that can be produced by the collision
hydrogen nuclei never come in contact under of a single neutron with a uranium atom was
ordinary conditions, owing to the repulsion of thecapable of producing more than one new neutron,
positive electric charges of the two nuiclei. There probably something of the order of two or three.
is no theoretical reason that prevents the coming It was felt at that time by many physicists that a
together of the two nuclei; indeed this could be chain reaction based on the uranium fission was
achieved both by very high temperatures and by a possibility well worth investigating.
very high pressures. Temperatures or pressures At the same time this possibility was viewed
that are, however, well beyond the limits that with hope and with great concern. Everybody
could be achieved by ordinary means. Actually was conscious early in 1939 of the imminence of a
temperatures large enough to permit nuclear re- war of annihilation. There was well founded fear
actions to proceed at an appreciable rate are that the tremendous military potentialities that
prevalent in the interior of many stars, in par- were latent in the new scientific developments
ticular of the sun; these reactions are generally might be reduced to practice first by the Nazis.
recognized as the main source of the energy Nobody at that time had any basis for predicting
irradiated by the stars. the size of the effort that would be needed, and
A second possible pattern for the liberation of it well may be that civilization owes its survival
nuclear energy is the chain reaction. In most nu- to the fact that the development of atomic bombs
clear disintegrations particles are emitted (a-par- requires an industrial effort of which no belliger-
ticles, protons, or neutrons) which in their turn ent except the United States would have been
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, VOL. 90, NO. 1, JANUARY, 1946
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST CHAIN REACTING PILE 21
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
22 ENRICO FERMI
a mathematical theory of the diffusion process. sult, it is clear that they should be known in-
The results of these investigations permitted to de- dividually with extreme accuracy to make a pre-
velop a mathematical method for calculating with diction possible. The measuring methods de-
fair accuracy all the life history of a neutron from veloped -up to 1941 seldom permitted the measure-
the moment of its emission as a fast neutron to ment of nuclear properties with an accuracy better
the moment of its final absorption. than 10 per cent and were therefore inadequate
At the same time work was initiated in order to give a basis for calculations that would permit
to determine the excess number of neutrons answering in a reliable way the question of
emitted by natural uranium when a thermal neu- whether the chain reaction with natural uranium
tron is absorbed by it. Since a considerable frac- and graphite was or was not possible.
tion of the thermal neutrons absorbed by uranium In any system of finite dimensions some neu-
is captured by U-238 and does not give rise to trons escape by diffusing out of its surface. This
fission, this excess turns out to be fairly small loss of neutrons by escape can in principle be
and makes it therefore very essential to avoid as eliminated by increasing the size of the system.
much as possible parasitic losses so as to end up It was clear in 1941 that the balance of neutrons
with a positive margin that may make the chain capable of sustaining a chain reaction, even if at
reaction a possibility. A simple trick permits a
all positive, would be so small as to make it neces-
very considerable reduction of the parasitic losses
sary to use a system of very large size in order to
that take place while the neutron is being slowed
eliminate most of the loss of neutrons by escape.
down. Instead of spreading the uranium uni-
It was important to devise methods capable of
formly throughout the mass of graphite, it is
answering the following questions: (1) whether a
more convenient to arrange it in lumps distributed
system containinlg lumps of uranium distributed
in some suitable lattice configuration throughout
through the graphite in a given lattice arrange-
the graphite. This device makes it less probable
ment would become chain reacting provided its
for a neutron to encounter a uranium atom dur-
dimensions were infinitely large; and (2) assum-
ing the slowing down process when its energy
ing a positive answer to the previous question,
makes it particularly vulnerable to parasitic
what minimum dimensions would be needed actu-
absorption.
ally to achieve the chain reaction? These mini-
In working out the effectiveness of this method,
mum dimensions are usually called the critical size
the group working at Columbia was very ma-
of the pile. Since the method of detailed calcula-
terially reinforced by the collaboration with a new
tion from the values measured for the constants
research group that was set up at Princeton
was inadequate as explained before, one had to
University. In the spring of 1941 sufficient data
devise some way that would give more directly
on the details of the process had been gathered to
the required answers.
enable one to form a relatively clear picture of the
A brute-force method for this would be to set
importance of the variotus factors and of the best
up a system of the given structure and keep on
devices to be used in order to minimize the un-
adding to it until a chain reaction actually is
favorable items.
achieved or the system refused to react even when
In principle it would be possible to measure
built up to enormous size. This method obviously
with great accuracy the absorption and scattering
would be exceedingly expensive both in materials
properties of neutrons for all energies and for all
and labor. Fortunately it is possible to obtain a
atoms involved arnd to use these results in a
fairly accurate answer to the two questions by
mathematical theory of the process so elaborate
using a relatively small sample of the structure
as to make it possible to predict the behavior of
under investigation. The first experiments of this
a given system accurately enough to answer the
type, the so-called intermediate or exponential ex-
question whether a given system would or would
not be chain reacting purely on a basis of calcu-
periments, were set up at Columbia University in
lation. The practical feasibility of this program
the summer and fall of 1941. A lattice structure
did not appear too hopeful. We know now that
was set up containing cans filled with uranium-
the positive excess that makes possible a chain re-oxide spread throughout a mass of some thirty tons
action in a graphite-uranium system is of only a of graphite. A primary source of neutrons was
few per cent. Since many factors of absorption inserted at the bottom of this mass and the distri-
anid production of neutrons enter in the final re- bution of the neutrolns throughout the mass was in-
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST CHAIN REACTING PILE 23
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
24 ENRICO FERMI
they were inside the pile. Each morning the cad- to any desired level. All the operator has to do
mium strips were slowly removed, one by one, and is to watch an instrument that indicates the inten-
a determination of the neutron intensity was car- sity of the reaction and move the cadmium strips
ried out in order to estimate how far we were from in if the intensity shows a tendency to rise, and
the critical conditions. out if the intensity shows a tendency to drop. To
On the morning of December 2, 1942, the indi- operate a pile is just as easy as to keep a car run-
cations were that the critical dimensions had been ning on a straight road by adjusting the steering
slightly exceeded and that the system did not chain wheel when the car tends to shift right or left.
react only because of the absorption of the cad- After a few hours of practice an operator can keep
mium strips. During the morning all the cad- easily the intensity of the reaction constant to a
mium strips.but one were carefully removed; then very small fraction of 1 per cent.
this last strip was gradually extracted, close watch The first pile had no device built in to remove
being kept on the intensity. From the measure- the heat produced by the reaction and it was not
ments it was expected that the system would be- provided with any shield to absorb the radiations
come critical by removing a length of about eight produced by the fission process. For these reasons
feet of this last strip. Actually when about seven it could be operated only at a nominal power which
feet were removed the intensity rose to a very high never exceeded two hundred watts. It proved,
value but still stabilized after a few minutes at a
however, two points: that the chain reaction with
finite level. It was with some trepidation that the
graphite and natural uranium was possible, and
order was given to remove one more foot and a
that it was very easily controllable.
half of the strip. This operation would bring us
A huge scientific and engineering development
over the top. When the foot and a half was pulled
was still needed to reduce to industrial practice the
out, the intensity started rising slowly, but at an
new art. Through the collaboration of all the men
increasing rate, and kept on increasing until it was
evident that it would actually diverge. Then the
of the Metallurgical project and of the Du Pont
cadmium strips were again inserted into the struc- Company, only about two years after the experi-
ture and the intensity rapidly dropped to an in- mental operation of the first pile large plants based
significant level. essentially on the same principle were put in opera-
This prototype of a chain reacting unit proved tion by the Du Pont Company at Hanford, pro-
to be exceedingly easy to control. Intensity of its ducing huge amounts of energy an(l relatively
operation could be adjusted with extreme accuracy large amounts of the new element, plutonium.
This content downloaded from 18.9.61.111 on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 21:52:34 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms