Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1. Organ printing concept: 3-D functional organs are printed from the bot-
RGAN shortage has become more problematic in spite tom up using living cells in a supportive medium (image courtesy of Christopher
the deposition system. Kachouie et al. proposed a method using Extrusion-based systems provide relatively better structural
hydrogel-encapsulated cells as tissue units to make a construct integrity due to continuous deposition of cylindrical struts. It is
with geometric patterns specific to target tissue types [31]. the most convenient technique in rapidly fabricating 3-D porous
Although bioprinting is a promising way as a methodical in- cellular structures [12]. Although this technology lays founda-
terface between tissue and engineering, each technique has its tion for cell patterning for scale-up tissue and organ fabrication
own limitations. Laser-based systems have high resolution and technologies, it constitutes several limitations such as shear-
enable precise patterning of living cells, where cells can main- stress-induced cell deformation and limited material selection
tain registry within 5.6 2.5 m to the initial pattern [32]. This due to need for rapid encapsulation of cells via gelation. Shear
resolution, certainly, cannot be achieved by other bioprinting stress on nozzle tip wall induces significant drop in the number
techniques that makes laser-based cell writing as a great po- of living cells when the cell density is high; however, this can be
tential for microcellular features in organs and tissues i.e., mi- partially alleviated using optimum process parameters such as
crovascularate. In the authors opinion, prolonged fabrication biomaterial concentration, nozzle pressure (ideally minimum),
time, laser shock related thermally and mechanically induced nozzle diameter, and loaded cell density [41]. Restricted bioma-
cell deformation, interactions of cell components with light, terial selection and low resolution and accuracy brings limited
gravitational and random setting of cells in the precursor solu- applicability of extrusion-based systems [12], [42]. Besides,
tion, limitations in printing in third dimension and the need for sufficiently high viscosity is essential for the biomaterial sus-
photo-crosslinkable biomaterials should be overcome for future pension to overcome surface tension-driven droplet formation
developments in laser-based systems [15], [33], [34]. In order and be drawn in the form of straight filaments. High viscosity,
to improve resolution further and increase throughput, param- on the other hand, triggers clogging inside the nozzle tip and
eters related to laser pulse characteristics (i.e., pulse duration, should be optimized considering the diameter of the nozzle tip.
wavelength, repetition rate, energy, and beam focus diameter), Considering prolonged fabrication time for printing scale-up
precursor solution properties such as viscosity, thickness, sur- tissues and organs, one of the important disadvantages of en-
face tension, and substrate properties should be optimized [34]. capsulating living cells in biomaterials is that cell-biomaterial
One-directional propulsion of cells toward the collector sub- suspension needs to be stored for a considerable period of time
strate (top to bottom) certainly limits development of 3-D struc- in the material reservoir that compromises cell viability and
tures with complex heterocellular architectures. In order to ex- limits their bioactivity. Thus, a more automated way of loading
pand this technology in the third dimension, a rotating donor- and ejecting cell-biomaterial suspension is required for scale-
side carousel leveling system with rotational and linear stages up tissue and organ fabrication. Recently, Novogen MMX Bio-
can be developed that allows printing multiple cells in different printer [43] developed the technology where the printer head has
layers for the development of heterocellular structures. Similar both suction and ejection capability enabling automatic loading
technology has been recently demonstrated with multimaterial of suspension through the nozzle tip occasionally instead of
stereolithography process [35]. In addition, the fabrication speed loading it manually prior to fabrication. Mechanical strength
can be improved by increasing the laser pulse rate or integrating and structural integrity of the fabricated structures is a com-
multiple laser beams [36]. mon drawback among bioprinting techniques, which mainly
Inkjet-based systems are versatile and affordable that favors use hydrogels due to high water content and biocompatibil-
cells encapsulation. For instance, Xu et al. [37] developed a ity that allows permeation of nutrients into and cellular prod-
fabrication platform with a different working principle as op- ucts out of the gel [44]. Water content increases their biocom-
posed to traditional inkjet printers, where droplets of crosslinker patibility; however, it deteriorates mechanical properties and
chemical were deposited onto a suspension of cardiomyocytes processability significantly. Although hydrogels possess unique
and alginate for 3-D cardiac pseudo tissue fabrication. In ad- properties, they are intrinsically weak due to high water con-
dition, the traditional setup allows integrating multiple print tent and do not withstand mechanical loading during and after
heads easily to deposit multiple cell types, which is one of the gelation process. Gelation of cell-encapsulated hydrogels is a
pivotal steps in fabricating heterocellular tissues and organs. crosslinking reaction initiated by a light, a chemical, or thermal
The other advantage of inkjet printing is that surfaces where transitions [45]. Photo-crosslinking processes compromise cell
the cells are printed and patterned do not have to be flat that viability and pose significant limitations on encapsulation of
favors cell printing in situ [38]. In general, all other techniques cells within hydrogels [33]. Crosslinking through thermal tran-
require gentle handling of a flat deposition surface that limits sitions limits the applicability of hydrogels. Thermal transition
their direct applicability in surgery rooms. Despite their great initiated crosslinking is not easy to handle after the process,
advantages, inkjet printers suffer from drawbacks including sig- while temperature changes can result in rapid degradation of
nificant cell damage and death as well as cell sedimentation and the printed thermogel that does not support cell viability in
aggregation due to small orifice diameter that restricts printing cell media culture [46]. Chemical crosslinking can compromise
cells in high densities (<5 106 cell/ml) [22], [39], [40]. In cell viability if any abrupt pH changes are observed; however,
addition, structural integrity of the printed structures is another nonacid involved crosslinking, i.e., sodium alginate, occurs gen-
obstacle, where the droplets do not fuse into each other easily tly under mild conditions and at room temperature without pro-
and the shape of droplets cannot be controlled precisely. Ade- ducing any toxic components, which has a great potential for
quate structural integrity is crucial to retain the designed and the tissue engineering [47]. So, new hydrogels should be tailored to
fabricated shape. enhance mechanical properties and processability for specific
694 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 60, NO. 3, MARCH 2013
Fig. 4. Tissue spheroids for blood vessel printing: (a) Deposition of straight
filaments containing a string of tissue spheroids (stained in white) with agarose
filaments as support material (stained in blue) both around cellular filaments and
Fig. 3. (a) Hanging drop cultures with 20 000 chondrocytes showing inside the core, (b) design for multicellular assembly with (c) printed samples
(b) spheroid fusion seven days after harvesting, creating a larger scale tissue. with human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells and human skin fibroblast cells
(reproduced from [55], image courtesy of Elsevier).
bioprinting techniques toward advanced tissue and organ fab-
rication. In addition, these materials should have the ability to spheroid as the resolution of the fabrication technology. In ad-
withstand sterilization while sterile conditions certainly need to dition, more efficient and economical ways of fabricating tissue
be acquired for process safety. spheroids are also under investigation. Iwasaki et al. introduced
In general, cell encapsulation in biomaterial allows cell pat- a new technique using micropatterned tissue culture plates for
terning that has a great potential for direct organ printing; how- mass fabrication of spheroids that has the potential for rapid
ever, subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) formation, diges- scale-up organ fabrication technology [54].
tion, and degradation of biomaterial matrix and proliferation of By using tissue spheroids, Forgacs and his coworkers at the
encapsulated cells are not trivial to control. There are still intrin- University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA, used RP-based
sic limitations for bioprinting due to limited cell proliferation bioprinting together with multicellular spheroids made from
and colonization while cells are immobilized within hydrogels, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, producing scaffold-free
and do not spread, stretch, and migrate to generate the new tis- vascular constructs [55]. Fig. 4 illustrates vascular construct
sue. Most recently, a new concept was introduced by Mironov printing, where tissue spheroids are printed sequentially in
and his coworkers [48], bioprinting and assembling them in cylindrical filaments from the bottom up. Upon fusion of tis-
hydrogel media has brought a significant potential for tissue sue spheroids followed by a tissue maturation process of three
engineering. days post-printing, the support material is pulled away manu-
Cell aggregates or cell-laden hydrogels as building blocks ally to generate the lumen. Multiple cell types, including human
at the microscale are selectively deposited to create larger tis- umbilical vein smooth muscle cells and human skin fibroblast
sues [48], [50], [51]. In this approach, these minitissues are cells, were printed together to fabricate multicellular constructs.
considered as a biomaterial with certain measurable and con- The bioprinting platform used in this study, the Novogen MMX
trollable properties and are assembled into tissues with specific Bioprinter [43], has been recently commercialized and special-
features through layer-by-layer stacking [52] or direct assem- izes in developing bioprinting across a broad array of cell types
bly [48], [53]. Fig. 3 shows hanging drop cultures, where each to create functional 3-D tissues. When building large-scale or-
spheroid contains 20 000 chondrocytes, and fusion between gan structures, the mechanical integrity of the printed structures
spheroids was observed seven days after harvesting, resulting in as well as the integration of the vascular network with the rest
a larger scale cartilage tissue. This shows a great promise in ob- of the organ seems to be the major challenges to expanding the
taining larger scale cartilage formation, where researchers have technology for further applications.
already demonstrated regeneration of cartilage tissue on rabbit
knees with comparable properties with that of natural cartilage
tissue [42]. Tissue spheroids in that study eliminated or mini- III. ORGAN PRINTING AND ITS CHALLENGES
mized inclusion of biomaterials and hence tissue regeneration Organ printing is a computer-aided process in which cells
achieved without the need of scaffolds. In general, this also re- and/or cell-laden biomaterials are placed in the form of aggre-
duces complications related with degradation of biomaterials gates, which then serve as building blocks and are further assem-
and resulted toxic byproducts. In addition, large-scale tissues bled into a 3-D functional organ. It is an automated approach
can be easily obtained by fusion process, where cells in cell- that offers a pathway for scalable, reproducible mass produc-
laden hydrogels cannot easily fuse [48]. By taking advantage tion of engineered living organs where multiple cell types can
of tissue spheroids, the time needed for tissue maturation can be positioned precisely to mimic their natural counterparts. De-
be significantly reduced, since each tissue spheroid contains a veloping a functional organ requires advances in and integration
large number of cells that can be printed at once. Moreover, cell of three types of technology [56]: 1) cell technology, which ad-
viability is enhanced due to the large cell seeding density and dresses the procurement of functional cells at the level needed
less mechanical stress experienced compared with direct cell for clinical applications, 2) biomanufacturing technology, which
manipulation [48]. Researchers have been investigating means involves combining the cells with biomaterials in a functional
to reduce the actual size of tissue spheroids which is around 3-D configuration, and 3) technologies for in vivo integration,
500 m because the current size restricts biomanufacturing of which addresses the issue of biomanufactured construct im-
smaller scale features considering the average size of tissue mune acceptance, in vivo safety and efficacy, and monitoring
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 60, NO. 3, MARCH 2013 695
[19] C. Xu, W. Chai, Y. Huang, and R. Marwald, Scaffold-free inkjet printing [45] A. S. Hoffman, Hydrogels for biomedical applications, Adv. Drug Deliv.
of three-dimensional zigzag cellular tubes, Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 209, Rev., vol. 64, pp. 1823, 2012.
pp. 31523160, 2012. [46] N. Fedorovich, J. Wijn, A. Verbout, J. Alblas, and W. Dhert, Three-
[20] C. L. Herran and Y. Huang, Alginate microsphere fabrication using bipo- dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs
lar wave-based drop-on-demand jetting, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 14, for bone tissue printing, Tissue Eng. A, vol. 14, pp. 127133,
pp. 98106, 2012. 2008.
[21] C. Xu, W. Chai, Y. Huang, and R. R. Markwald, Scaffold-free inkjet [47] J. L. Drury and D. J. Mooney, Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold
printing of three-dimensional zigzag cellular tubes, Biotechnol. Bioeng., design variables and applications, Biomaterials, vol. 24, pp. 43374351,
vol. 109, pp. 31523160, 2012. 2003.
[22] X. Cui and T. Boland, Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal [48] V. Mironov, R. P. Visconti, V. Kasyanov, G. Forgacs, C. J. Drake, and
inkjet printing technology, Biomaterials, vol. 30, pp. 62216227, 2009. R. R. Markwald, Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks,
[23] L. Weiss, C. Amon, S. Finger, E. Miller, and D. Romero, Bayesian Biomaterials, vol. 30, pp. 21642174, 2009.
computer-aided experimental design of heterogenous scaffolds for tissue [49] L. Chopinet, L. Wasungu, and M.-P. Rols, First explanations for differ-
engineering, Comput. Aided Des., vol. 37, pp. 11271139, 2005. ences in electrotransfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo using spheroid
[24] P. G. Campbell and L. E. Weiss, Tissue engineering with the aid of inkjet model, Int. J. Pharmaceutics, vol. 423, pp. 715, 2012.
printers, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., vol. 7, pp. 11231127, 2007. [50] X. Yang, V. Mironov, and Q. Wang, Modeling fusion of cellular aggre-
[25] K. Jakab, C. Norotte, F. Marga, K. Murphy, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, and gates in biofabrication using phase field theories, J. Theor. Biol., vol. 303,
G. Forgacs, Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of pp. 110118, 2012.
living cells, Biofabrication, vol. 2, p. 022001, 2010. [51] V. Mironov, V. Kasyanov, and R. Markwald, Organ printing: From bio-
[26] Y. Yan, X. Wang, Y. Pan, H. Liu, J. Cheng, Z. Xiong, F. Lin, R. Wu, printer to organ biofabrication line, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., vol. 22,
R. Zhang, and Q. Lu, Fabrication of viable tissue-engineered constructs pp. 667673, 2011.
with 3D cell-assembly technique, Biomaterials, vol. 26, pp. 58645871, [52] N. LHeureux, T. N. McAllister, and L. M. de la Fuente, Tissue-
2005. engineered blood vessel for adult arterial revascularization, N. Engl. J.
[27] R. Chang, J. Nam, and W. Sun, Direct cell writing of 3D micro-organ for Med., vol. 357, pp. 14511453, 2007.
in vitro pharmacokinetic model, Tissue Eng., vol. 14, pp. 157169, 2008. [53] Y. Du, E. Lo, S. Ali, and A. Khademhosseini, Directed assembly of cell-
[28] S. Khalil and W. Sun, Biopolymer deposition for freeform fabrication laden microgels for fabrication of 3D tissue constructs, Proc. Natl Acad.
of hydrogel tissue constructs, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 27, pp. 469478, Sci. USA, vol. 105, pp. 95229527, 2008.
2007. [54] A. Iwasaki, T. Matsumoto, G. Tazaki, H. Tsuruta, H. Egusa, H. Miyajima,
[29] S. Khalil, F. Nam, and W. Sun, Multi-nozzle deposition for construction and T. Sohmura, Mass fabrication of small cell spheroids by using micro-
of 3-D biopolymer tissue scaffolds, Rapid Prototyping J., vol. 11, pp. 9 patterned tissue culture plate, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 11, pp. 801804,
17, 2005. 2009.
[30] K. Nair, K. Yan, and W. Sun, A multi-level numerical model for quantify- [55] C. Norotte, F. S. Marga, L. E. Niklason, and G. Forgacs, Scaffold-free
ing cell deformation in encapsulated alginate structures, J. Mech. Mater. vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting, Biomaterials, vol. 30,
Struct., vol. 6, pp. 11211139, 2007. pp. 59105917, 2009.
[31] N. N. Kachouie, Y. Du, H. Bae, M. Khabiry, A. F. Ahari, B. Zamanian, [56] R. Lanza, R. Langer, and J. Vacanti, Principles of Tissue Engineering, 3rd
J. Fukuda, and A. Khademhosseini, Directed assembly of cell-laden ed. New York, USA: Elsevier, 2007.
hydrogels for engineering functional tissues, Organogenesis, vol. 6, [57] W. W. Thein-Han and Y. Kitiyanant, Chitosan scaffolds for in vitro buf-
pp. 234244, 2010. falo embryonic stem-like cell culture: An approach to tissue engineering,
[32] N. R. Schiele, D. B. Chrisey, and D. Corr, Gelatin-based laser direct- J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., vol. 80, pp. 92101, 2007.
write technique for the precise spatial patterning of cells, Tissue Eng. C, [58] R. L. Gardner, Stem cells: Potency, plasticity and public perception, J.
vol. 17, pp. 289298, 2011. Anat., vol. 200, pp. 27782, 2002.
[33] T. Billiet, M. Vandenhaute, J. Schelfhout, S. Van Vlierberghe, and [59] R. S. Tuan, G. Boland, and R. Tuli, Adult mesenchymal stem cells and
P. Dubruel, A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid pro- cell-based tissue engineering, Arthritis Res. Ther., vol. 5, pp. 3245,
totyping for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, vol. 33, pp. 60206041, 2003.
2012. [60] M. T. Lam and M. T. Longaker, Comparison of several attachment meth-
[34] S. Catros, B. Guillotin, M. Baca kova, J.-C. Fricain, and F. Guillemot, ods for human iPS, embryonic and adipose-derived stem cells for tissue
Effect of laser energy, substrate film thickness and bioink viscosity on engineering, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., vol. 6, pp. s80s86, 2012.
viability of endothelial cells printed by laser-assisted bioprinting, Appl. [61] D. Seol, D. J. McCabe, H. Choe, H. Zheng, Y. Yu, K. Jang, M. W. Walter,
Surf. Sci., vol. 257, pp. 51425147, 2011. A. D. Lehman, L. Ding, J. A. Buckwalter, and J. A. Martin, Chondrogenic
[35] J.-W. Choi, H.-C. Kim, and R. Wicker, Multi-material stereolithography, progenitor cells respond to cartilage injury, Arthritis Rheum., vol. 64,
J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 211, pp. 318328, 2011. pp. 36263637, 2012.
[36] B. Guillotin and F. Guillemot, Cell patterning technologies for organ- [62] Y. Yu, Identification and characterization of cartilage progenitor cells by
otypic tissue fabrication, Trends Biotechnol., vol. 29, pp. 183190, 2011. single cell sorting and cloning, Masters thesis, The Univ. of Iowa, Iowa
[37] T. Xu, C. Baicu, M. Aho, M. Zile, and T. Boland, Fabrication and char- City, Iowa, USA, 2012.
acterization of bio-engineered cardiac pseudo tissues, Biofabrication, [63] C. L. Stabler, R. C. Long, I. Constantinidis, and A. Sambanis, In vivo
vol. 1, p. 035001, 2009. noninvasive monitoring of a tissue-engineered construct using 1H-NMR
[38] K. W. Binder, In situ bioprinting of the skin,. (2011). Ph.D. dissertation spectroscopy, Cell Transplant, vol. 14, pp. 139149, 2005.
in molecular genetics and genomics, Wake Forest Univ., Winston-Salem, [64] W. L. Mondy, D. Cameron, J.-P. Timmermans, N. D. Clerk, A. Sasov,
NC, USA, 2011. C. Casteleyn, and L. A. Piegl, Computer-aided design of microvascu-
[39] X. Cui, D. Dean, Z. M. Ruggeri, and T. Boland, Cell damage evaluation of lature systems for use in vascular scaffold production, Biofabrication,
thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells, Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 1, p. 035002, 2009.
vol. 106, pp. 963969, 2010. [65] J. Thilmany, Printed life, Mech. Eng. Mag., vol. 134, pp. 4447, 2012.
[40] T. Xu, J. Jin, C. Gregory, J. J. Hickman, and T. Boland, Inkjet printing [66] envisionTEC. (Dec. 7, 2012), [Online]. Available: www.envisiontec.com
of viable mammalian cells, Biomaterials, vol. 26, pp. 9399, 2005. [67] R. Marcos, R. A. Monteiro, and E. Rocha, Design-based stereological
[41] K. Nair, M. Gandhi, S. Khalil, K. C. Yan, M. Marcolongo, K. Barbee, and estimation of hepatocyte number, by combining the smooth optical frac-
W. Sun, Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes, tionator and immunocytochemistry with anti-carcinoembryonic antigen
Biotechnol. J., vol. 4, pp. 11681177, 2009. polyclonal antibodies, Liver Int., vol. 26, pp. 116124, 2006.
[42] J. Lee, M. Sato, H. Kim, and J. Mochida, Transplantation of scaffold-free [68] B. D. McLees, G. Schleiter, and S. R. Pinnell, Isolation of type III col-
spheroids composed of synovium-derived cells and chondrocytes for the lagen from human adult parenchymal lung tissue, Biochemistry, vol. 16,
treatment of cartilage defects of the knee, Europ. Cells Mater., vol. 22, pp. 185190, 1977.
pp. 275290, 2011. [69] V. Richmond, Lung parenchymal elastin isolated by non-degradative
[43] OrganovoT M (Dec. 7, 2012), [Online]. Available: http://www.organovo. means, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, vol. 351, pp. 173177, 1974.
com/ [70] E. Gylfe, B. Hellman, E. Grapengiesser, H. Dansk, and A. Salehi, Insulin
[44] G. Y. Huang, L. H. Zhou, Q. C. Zhang, Y. M. Chen, W. Sun, F. Xu, and oscillationsclinically important rhythm. Anti-diabetics should increase
T. J. Lu, Microfluidic hydrogels for tissue engineering, Biofabrication, the pulsative component of the insulin release, Lakartidningen, vol. 104,
vol. 3, p. 012001, 2011. no. 32-33, pp. 22362239, 2007.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 60, NO. 3, MARCH 2013 699
Ibrahim T. Ozbolat received dual B.S. degrees in Yin Yu received the M.D. degree from Medical Col-
industrial engineering and mechanical engineering lege of Nantong University, China, in 2010, and the
from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, M.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Uni-
Turkey, in 2006 and 2007, respectively, and the Ph.D. versity of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
degree in industrial engineering from University at His research mainly focuses on stem cell biology,
Buffalo, New York, USA, in 2011. tissue engineering, and biomanufacturing.
He is an Assistant Professor of the Department Prof. Yu is a member of ASME, TERMIS, BMES,
of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering and a Re- and ICMRS.
search Faculty at the Center for Computer-Aided De-
sign at The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA. His
research interests are biomanufacturing, tissue en-
gineering, manufacturing and design, virtual manufacturing, computer-aided
design, and electronics manufacturing.
Prof. Ozbolat is a member of IIE, ASME, APM and TERMIS.