Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor [Alberta, Inactive]

914 950 Drake Avenue

Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6Z 2B9
Ph. 604.609.0520
bkempo@hotmail.com
Your File #: OTP-CR-274/10

September 29, 2010

International Criminal Court

Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands

Attention: M.P. Dillon, Head of Information & Evidence Unit

Via e-mail: OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int

Dear Sir/Madam:

Re: Obstruction of Justice; Complaint Pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Statute of

Rome

The purpose of this correspondence is to deliver and examine evidence related

to an assassination threat directed at me for preparing the Lutfy culpability

assessment.

On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 I began authoring the assessment against

the now Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada. My computers Microsoft

software time stamped the origination of that word doc at 7:10 p.m.. I worked on

it throughout the following day.

 2

As documented in the culpability assessment against owners and executives of

Thomson Corporation and Bell Canada, the national television network CTV has

been involved in advancing unlawful and unconstitutional interests, policies and

practices. In particular their jointly owned entertainment news program ETalk

has been the delivery mechanism for back-channel diplomacy.

The first instance of threatening me with assassination was May 1, 2006 as

documented in 'From Lab to Slab' - A Combination Human Experimentation

Confession and Death Threat (http://www.fromlabtoslab.synthasite.com), and

delivered by Asian co-host Tanya Kim. This was the first major reaction by the

operators of the triangle of power and wealth to diplomacy that began in

February 2006 and sought to disincentive me from assisting my international

clients in compelling malfeasant parties to halt violations of domestic and

international law, including the R&D, deployment and proliferation of stealth

cognition technologies (SCT).

This threat is documented at http://chinadathreat9-16-01.yolasite.com.

This assassination threat by the directing minds of Thomson Corporation and

Bell Canada, their owners and executives, through the actions of their television

producers and program co-hosts is to be viewed as another instance of (i)

arrogant belligerence and (ii) guilty conscience evidence.

 3

With respect to the former the evidence is unambiguously clear: those

perpetuating Canadas militarized totalitarian paradigm of governance, helping

the Chinese governments global ambitions that mirror what the Soviet Union

sought in the 20th century and advancing SCT in all its forms have no intention of

ever stopping, even when faced with a coalition of many thousand public and

private sector parties who stated non-stop over 4 years as documented in the

archive they are going to protect the peace, security and prosperity of the world.

With respect to the latter, uttering a guaranteed assassination threat is how one

would expect such a regime to react after being exposed and the target of

initiatives involving institutional reform and accountability of the most politically

powerful officials of the state and wealthiest individuals and corporations.

In domestic criminal justice circles what was done to aggressively dissuade me

from pursuing the ICC prosecution is obstruction of justice:

Obstructing Justice (Canada)

139 (2) Everyone who wilfully attempts ... to obstruct, pervert or defeat the
course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of
imprisonment not exceeding ten years.

(3) [E]veryone shall be deemed wilfully to attempt to obstruct, pervert or

defeat the course of justice who in a judicial proceeding, existing or
proposed, (a) dissuades or attempts to dissuade a person by threats ...
from giving evidence.

Source: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-c-46/latest/rsc-1985-c-c-46.html
 4

Obstructing Justice (USA)

1512 (2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force
against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent to (A) influence,
delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding [...]
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).

(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is (C) in the case
of the threat of use of physical force against any person, imprisonment for
not more than 20 years.

Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001512----000-.html

What this law violating behavior demonstrates again is the factionless nature of

Canadian governance and how because of it there is no fear of prosecution

domestically. And it proves yet again that malfeasant parties dont believe there

is any way the international community can halt what they have been doing and

are continuing, in particular the R&D, deployment and proliferation of SCT.

Best regards,

Brad Kempo, Barrister & Solicitor