American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) Raters’ Report Gallaudet University Name: Garrido-Nag, Karen Interview Date: 25-Oct-2010 Department: Hearing, Speech and Lenguage ASLPIRating: 1.8 Sciences (HSLS) | The American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) evaluation you took at Gallaudet University on October 25, 2010 has been rated and the three raters have determined your present proficiency in American Sign Language as demonstrated in the interview to be 1.8. The results of your evaluation are also being sent to the Department Chair. ce: Dr. Matthew Bakke This eport contains information pertaining to the American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) evaluation et Gallaudet Universty whichis confidential and prvieged. The information Intended fer use by the individual narred above on this repor. It you are not the intended recipient, be aware thet ary disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this informations prohites. It you have receives ths information in err, please send emailto: aslpi@gallaudet.edy. In acon, all ports anc attachments received in error are to bo ratumed tothe ASL Diagnostic and Evaluation Services (ASL-DES), Gallaudet Universiy, £0 Florida Avenue NE, Mori Learning Center, 2200, Washington, DC 20008.American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLP!) Raters! Report Gallaudet University Nami 25-Oct-2010 Department: Hearing, Speech and Language Sciences ASLPIRating: 18 (HSLS) ‘Areas Evaluated: The five subcategories below are considered when eveluating an American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) at Gallaudet University. Each subcategory receives a score ranging from 0-6 from three independent evaluators. The scores are then totaled and divided by the number of evaluators, Mean scores for each subcategory are provided below. Except for LEVEL 5, the scoring process sometimes results in the assignment of a plus value (+). This does not represent a ‘midway point between two levels, but may be inferred to indicate that the examinee exceeds the requirements for a particular level but does not satisfy in all respects the requirements of the next higher level. Garrido-Nag, Karen Interview D: Mean Scores Grammar 1 ‘The clear and appropriate use of sentence types, grammatical categories, and discourse functions. The synchronization of both manual and non-manual components of grammar is also examined. Vocabulary 2 ‘The accuracy and extensiveness ofthe sign vocabulary used by the examinee. Sign selection across a variely of topics and the ably to use coloquial expressions and figurative language is also evaluated, AccentiProduction 2 ‘The formation and execution of signs, numbers, and fingerspeliing. Attention is also given to the use of space and the incorporation of affective facial expressions and Upper body movements, Fluency 2 The rhythm, pace, and flow of delivery according to topics being discussed. Comprehension 2 The overall understanding of the questions, comments, and statements made during the interview. Also examined are the examinee’s spontaneity, responses to questions, and ability to provide visual feedback to the interviewer. ‘his report contains information pertaining tothe American Sign Language Proficianey Interview (ASLPI) eveluation at Gallaudet Universiy which is confidential and privileged. The Information is intended for use by tne individual named above on this repor. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, cepying,distnbuton or use ofthe contents of this information s prohibited. I you have received this information in error, please send emailto: asipi@galaudet edu. In addition, all reports and ments received in error are tobe returned to the ASL Diagnostic and Evaluation Services (ASL-DES), Gellaudet University, 09 Florida Avenue NE, Merril Learning Center, 2200, Washington, DC 20002.