You are on page 1of 12

520814

research-article2014
HPQ0010.1177/1359105314520814Journal of Health PsychologyAndrew et al.

Article

Journal of Health Psychology

Positive body image and young


2016, Vol. 21(1) 2839
The Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permissions:
womens health: Implications for sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1359105314520814
sun protection, cancer screening, hpq.sagepub.com

weight loss and alcohol


consumption behaviours

Rachel Andrew, Marika Tiggemann


and Levina Clark

Abstract
This study examined the link between positive body image and a range of health behaviours. Participants
were 256 women who completed an online questionnaire measuring body appreciation, body dissatisfaction,
sun protection, cancer screening, seeking medical attention, weight-loss behaviour and alcohol and tobacco
consumption. Results indicated that body appreciation was positively related to sun protection, skin
screening and seeking medical attention and negatively related to weight-loss behaviour. Body appreciation
explained unique variance, over and above body dissatisfaction, in sun protection, skin screening and weight-
loss behaviour. These results have implications for interventions to improve adherence to health behaviours.

Keywords
body appreciation, cancer, health behaviour, sun protection, womens health

Body image has been conceptualised as a com- aspects of body image (Frisn and Holmqvist,
plex and multidimensional construct that has 2010).
the ability to influence quality of life, as well as Broadly defined, positive body image refers
affective, cognitive and behavioural function- to the love, respect, acceptance and appreciation
ing (Pruzinsky and Cash, 2002). Despite the held for ones body (Tylka, 2011). Having posi-
broad understanding of body image as a multi- tive body image allows individuals to accept all
faceted concept, theory and research in the body aspects of their body, even those which are con-
image field have previously been pathology trary to media-portrayed ideals, and to appreci-
focused (Williams etal., 2004), and has concen- ate the functions their body performs for them.
trated on negative aspects of body image (Tylka,
2011). In particular, body dissatisfaction had
been the major focus (Grogan, 1999). This Flinders University, Australia
focus has meant that the multifaceted nature of
Corresponding author:
body image has not been acknowledged Rachel Andrew, School of Psychology, Flinders University,
(Pruzinsky and Cash, 2002). More specifically, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia.
there has been little research on the positive Email: Rachel.Andrew@flinders.edu.au
Andrew et al. 29

Such individuals feel confident and happy with response to internal physiological cues; Tribole
their body, and treat their body with care and and Resch, 1995; Tylka, 2006), style (Augustus-
attention (Tylka, 2011). Importantly, this con- Horvath and Tylka, 2011; Avalos and Tylka,
struct is argued to be more than just the presence 2006), and negatively related to drive for thin-
of low negative body image (Tylka, 2011), or ness (Langdon and Petracca, 2010), eating dis-
the mere absence of body dissatisfaction (Wood- order symptomology (Avalos etal., 2005) and
Barcalow etal., 2010). The small amount of lit- engaging in weight-loss-related conversations
erature examining the general construct of with friends (Wasylkiw and Butler, 2013).
positive body image suggests that positive body Thus, this study aimed to investigate a broader
image is associated with variables beyond body range of health-related outcomes that could
satisfaction such as optimism and self-esteem potentially result from positive body image. An
(e.g. Williams etal., 2004). understanding of the role (if any) that positive
Until recently, research examining positive body image plays in specific health behaviours
body image has been hampered by the absence will not only assist in clarifying the theoretical
of any reliable and valid measurement tool. conceptualisation of positive body image but
Recognition of the need to operationalise posi- may also benefit interventions and initiatives
tive body image beyond a lack of body dissatis- that attempt to increase health behaviour
faction led to the construction of the Body compliance.
Appreciation Scale (BAS) by Avalos etal. There are many health-promotion cam-
(2005). This scale has now been used in a small paigns, programmes and policies (in Australia,
but growing number of empirical studies. Body and elsewhere) that are designed to influence
appreciation has been shown to be related posi- particular modifiable health behaviours in the
tively to self-esteem (e.g. Lobera and Ros, population (Australian Institute of Health and
2011) and self-compassion (Wasylkiw etal., Welfare, 2012). Such campaigns target either
2012), which refers to an attitude of kindness increases in health-promoting behaviours or
and caring towards oneself (Neff, 2003). A pos- decreases in health-compromising behaviours,
itive relationship has also been found with per- or both. This study focused on health behav-
ceived social support and acceptance within iours that feature in contemporary Australian
personal relationships (Augustus-Horvath and health campaigns. In particular, the health-
Tylka, 2011). Negative associations have been promoting behaviours of sun protection, and
reported between body appreciation and self- skin, breast and cervical cancer screening, and
objectification (Augustus-Horvath and Tylka, the health-compromising behaviours of
2011), which is the internalisation of an observ- unhealthy weight-loss behaviour and alcohol
ers perspective of the body (Fredrickson and and tobacco consumption were examined as
Roberts, 1997), as well as with having a non- possible outcomes of positive body image. In
anxious relationship with ones God (Homan addition, seeking medical attention when
and Cavanaugh, 2013). needed was included as a more general measure
In her review of positive body image theoris- of engagement in health and because body
ing and research, Tylka (2011) suggested that image has been previously implicated as a bar-
future research should examine more tangible rier to engaging in medical care (Alegria Drury
real-world outcomes, and, in particular, how and Louis, 2002).
positive body image relates to attentiveness to Australia has the highest incidence of skin
the body and detection of disease. As yet, there cancer in the world (International Agency for
has been no research investigating health- Research on Cancer, 2008), with skin cancer
related outcomes of positive body image (oper- accounting for approximately 80 per cent of all
ationalised as body appreciation) outside of the newly diagnosed cancers each year (Cancer
eating realm. Here, positive body image has Council Australia, 2012b). As a result, different
been related to an intuitive eating (i.e. eating in behaviours which provide protection from
30 Journal of Health Psychology 21(1)

harmful ultraviolet radiation (UVR) are encour- avoiding breast, cervical or colorectal
aged through specific campaigns, for example screening.
the Slip, Slop, Slap, Seek, Slide (Cancer Unhealthy weight-loss practices and alco-
Council Australia, 2012c) and the No tan is hol and tobacco consumption are behaviours
worth dying for (Cancer Council Australia, that can compromise health and have been a
2012a) campaigns. Although some links focus of health initiatives in Australia. Due to
between tanning behaviour and higher body the increasing incidence of overweight and
satisfaction (Yoo and Kim, 2012) and weight obesity in Australia, current dietary guidelines
concern (ORiordan etal., 2006) have been advocate for healthy weight management
reported, minimal attention has been directed strategies (National Health and Medical
towards other sun protection behaviours such as Research Council, 2013). However, not all
hat or sunscreen use. weight-loss strategies are healthy, for exam-
A related health behaviour is skin screening ple, the diet industry promotes a variety of
for moles and other abnormalities, which has products such as shakes and pills (Ogden,
been targeted by Australian health-promotion 2003). Many previous studies have shown
initiatives. In Australia, people are encouraged associations between body dissatisfaction and
to scan for various cancers, including regularly unhealthy weight-loss strategies and dieting
inspecting all skin areas for suspicious looking (see Stice and Shaw, 2002).
moles (Cancer Council Australia, 2007). A cer- Alcohol and tobacco consumption have been
vical cancer screening programme for women shown to be leading causes of disease and death
between the ages of 18 and 69 years recom- in Australia, with tobacco consumption the
mends Papanicolaou (pap) tests every 2 years largest risk factor for cancer-related burden of
(Department of Health and Ageing, 2009). disease (Begg etal., 2008). Associations
Programmes for mammogram breast screen- between body dissatisfaction (Kendzor etal.,
ings presently target women aged 5069 years, 2009; Stice and Shaw, 2003) or weight preoc-
although younger women are also encouraged cupation (Clark etal., 2005) with cigarette
to be vigilant for any breast abnormalities smoking have been reported. One focus area of
(Department of Health and Ageing, 2012). Australian alcohol-related guidelines is single
As noted by Ridolfi and Crowther (2012) in occasion excessive alcohol use (or binge-
their review of body image disturbance and drinking), and reducing risk of injury when
cancer screening, screening behaviours are binge-drinking (National Health and Medical
especially pertinent to body image, as they Research Council, 2009). Binge drinking has
require inspection (personally, and sometimes itself been found to be associated with body dis-
from a medical professional) of the body. Here, satisfaction (Nelson etal., 2009).
links between body dissatisfaction and discom- In sum, the major aim of this study was to
fort (Chait etal., 2009; Jensen and Moriarty, examine a range of diverse health behaviour
2008; Risica etal., 2008) and lower frequency outcomes of positive body image, which to our
of skin examinations have been reported. There knowledge is the first study to do so.
is less research examining body image distur- Relationships were also compared with body
bance and breast and cervical cancer screening. dissatisfaction, the most common measure of
One study (Chait etal., 2009) found no associ- (negative) body image. It was hypothesised that
ation between body disturbance and womens body appreciation would be positively related
breast screening behaviour or intention, while to the health-promoting behaviours and nega-
another (DeMaria etal., 2011) reported no tively related to the health-compromising
association with gynaecological exam behav- behaviours. Furthermore, body appreciation
iour. More generally, however, Clark etal. was predicted to explain additional unique vari-
(2009) reported that body image concern was ance in health behaviours over and above that
one of the most frequently reported barriers to explained by body dissatisfaction.
Andrew et al. 31

Method scale was also found to have high internal reli-


ability ( = .93).
Participants
Participants were 256 women aged 1829 years Body dissatisfaction.Body dissatisfaction was
(M = 20.11, standard deviation (SD) = 3.11) measured by the Body Areas Satisfaction Scale
who were students at an urban university in (BASS) of Brown etal. (1990) and Cash (2000).
South Australia. Participants mean body mass Participants rate on a 5-point Likert scale how
index (BMI) was 23.50 (SD = 6.01), which falls dissatisfied or satisfied they are with their
within the normal range (World Health appearance overall, and with eight specific
Organization, 2013). The majority of partici- areas (e.g. face) or elements (e.g. muscle tone)
pants identified as Caucasian or White (89.1%), of their body (from 1 = very dissatisfied to 5 =
with 8.5 per cent Asian, 0.4 per cent Aboriginal very satisfied). All items were reverse scored,
or Torres Strait Islander, 0.4 per cent African summed and averaged to create a measure of
and 1.6 per cent other. body dissatisfaction. For women, the BASS has
been reported to have good 1-month testretest
reliability (Cash, 2000), internal consistency (
Materials
= .82) (Cash etal., 2002) and good incremental
Participants completed an online questionnaire validity (Giovannelli etal., 2008). For the pre-
which contained the measures listed below and sent sample, internal reliability was acceptable
was approved by the relevant institutional eth- ( = .80).
ics committee. Participant consent was indi-
cated by completion of the questionnaire. Sun protection.Five questions related to sun
protection were adopted from the Cancer Coun-
Background information.Participants were cil Australias National Sun Protection Survey
asked their age, height, weight and ethnicity. (see Dobbinson etal., 2008). These questions
BMI was then calculated as weight (kg)/ examined specific behaviours such as wearing
height2 (m2). sunscreen and staying in the shade during peak
UV hours in summer. Participants rated how
Positive body image. Positive body image, oper- often they performed each sun protection
ationalised as body appreciation, was assessed behaviour (from 1 = never to 5 = always). The 5
by the BAS of Avalos etal. (2005) which meas- items were summed to create a total sun protec-
ures the appreciation, acceptance, respect and tion behaviour score ranging from 5 to 25.
attention given to ones body. Participants rate Internal reliability for this scale fell just short of
13 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = acceptable ( = .64) in the current sample of
never to 5 = always). Exemplar items are women.
Despite my flaws, I accept my body for what
it is, and I am attentive to my bodys needs. Cancer screening.There were three forms of
Responses are averaged, and range from 1 to 5, cancer screening, those for skin, breast and cer-
with higher scores reflecting greater body vical cancer. Skin screening was assessed with
appreciation. The BAS has been found to have two questions regarding checking for sun spots
a unidimensional factor structure, good inter- and moles regularly, and getting moles and sun
nal reliability ( = .91.94), 3-week testrest spots checked by a health professional (r = .52,
reliability (r = .90) and convergent validity p < .001), which were summed and averaged to
with samples of US college women (Avalos create a skin screening measure. Similar ques-
etal., 2005). In a previous study with Austral- tions assessed checking for breast lumps (r =
ian women (M age = 39.93 years, SD = 13.27 .34, p < .001). A single item asked participants
years), the BAS was found to have high inter- whether they receive pap tests when they are
nal reliability ( = .90) (Tiggemann and required. Participants rated all items on a
McCourt, 2013). For the present sample, the 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = always),
32 Journal of Health Psychology 21(1)

with higher scores reflecting more participation Table 1. Descriptive statistics of body image
in the health behaviour. variables and health behaviours.

M SD Range
Medical attention.One additional question
asked whether participants see a doctor when Body appreciation 3.23 0.79 15
needed and assessed general engagement in Body dissatisfaction 2.92 0.67 15
health which was rated on 5-point Likert scale Health-promoting behaviours
(from 1 = never to 5 = always). Sun protection 14.54 3.73 525
Screening behaviours
Skin screening 2.32 0.98 15
Weight-loss behaviours. Participants were asked
Breast screening 2.03 0.96 15
to rate the extent to which they Use weight-
Pap tests 2.88 1.74 15
loss shakes, supplements or pills, and had
Medical attention 3.81 1.14 15
Been on a diet in order to lose weight on a
Health-compromising behaviours
5-point Likert scale (from 1 = never to 5 = Weight-loss behaviours 2.01 1.04 15
always). These 2 items were moderately corre- Alcohol consumption 0.13 1.77 4 to +4
lated (r = .53, p < .001) and were summed and Cigarette smoking 1.93 0.26 12
averaged to create a single measure of weight-
loss behaviours. SD: standard deviation.

Alcohol consumption. Participants consumption


The mean score for sun protection behaviours
of alcohol at risky levels was assessed using
indicates that on average, participants some-
two questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders
times performed behaviours such as wearing
Identification Test (AUDIT) Alcohol Screen
sunscreen and staying in the shade. As can be
(Commonwealth Department of Veterans
seen in Table 2 which displays the correlations
Affairs, 2003). The questions were How many
between positive body image (body apprecia-
standard drinks do you have on a typical day
tion) and health behaviours, body appreciation
when you are drinking? (from 1 or 2 to 10 or
was significantly positively related to sun
more) and How often do you have six or more
protection.
standard drinks on one occasion?(from never
Participants on average performed cancer
to daily or almost daily). Reponses for the two
screening behaviours between rarely and
questions were standardised and summed to
sometimes, and as can be seen in Table 2, the
create one risky alcohol consumption score.
correlations between body appreciation and
cancer screening behaviours were all positive.
Tobacco consumption.Participants were asked
However, only the correlation with skin screen-
two questions regarding their tobacco use from
ing reached statistical significance.
the National Drug Strategy Household Survey
For medical attention, participants reported
(Australian Institute of Health and Welfare,
that they sought medical attention when they
2011). First, they were asked whether or not they
needed often, and as predicted, body appreci-
smoke cigarettes, and second, with what fre-
ation was significantly positively related to this
quency (Daily, At least weekly (but not daily),
behaviour.
Less often than weekly and Not at all).

Results Body appreciation and health-


compromising behaviours
Body appreciation and health-
Participants on average reported performing
promoting behaviours weight-loss behaviours rarely. As predicted,
Descriptive statistics for body image and health body appreciation was significantly negatively
behaviour variables are displayed in Table 1. correlated with weight-loss behaviours.
Andrew et al. 33

Table 2. Correlations between body appreciation, Relative contribution of body


body dissatisfaction and health behaviours.
appreciation to health behaviours
Body Body
Participants body appreciation was found to be
appreciation dissatisfaction
negatively correlated with their body dissatis-
r r faction as would be expected, r = .80, p < .001.
Table 2 displays the correlations between body
Health-promoting behaviours
Sun protection .17** .09
dissatisfaction and the various health behav-
Screening behaviours iours. As can be seen, the pattern of correlations
Skin screening .16* .14* for body dissatisfaction was somewhat different
Breast .10 .12 from that for body appreciation. In particular,
screening while both variables were related (in the oppo-
Pap tests .08 .05 site direction) to skin screening, seeking medi-
Medical attention .18** .20** cal attention and weight-loss behaviours, only
Health-compromising behaviours body appreciation was related to sun protection,
 Weight-loss .41*** .35*** and only body dissatisfaction was related to
behaviours alcohol consumption.
Alcohol .09 .14* To formally test whether positive body image
consumption contributed unique variance, over and above
Cigarette .06 .04 body dissatisfaction, to any of the health behav-
smoking
iours, a series of hierarchical multiple regres-
Multiple R2 .239*** .215***
sions were carried out for each of the health
*p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001. behaviours. In each hierarchical multiple regres-
sion, body dissatisfaction was entered in Step 1,
and body appreciation was entered in Step 2, to
For alcohol consumption, the median cate-
predict the health behaviour. The results of these
gory for the number of standard alcoholic
analyses are provided in Table 3, with R2change
drinks consumed when drinking was 3 or 4
and Fchange values in Step 2 indicating whether or
alcoholic drinks (24.8%). The median category
not body appreciation offered additional predic-
for the frequency with which participants con-
tion over and above body dissatisfaction.
sumed six or more standard alcoholic drinks on
As can be seen in Table 3, body appreciation
single occasions was less than monthly
explained significant unique variance in sun
(30.6%). Body appreciation was not found to
protection, skin screening and weight-loss
be significantly related to total alcohol
behaviours. That is, body appreciation offered
consumption.
predictive value in these three health behav-
The vast majority of participants did not
iours, over and above body dissatisfaction. The
smoke cigarettes (N = 232), with 91.6 per cent
only initially significant behaviour for which
indicating they do not smoke cigarettes at all,
body appreciation did not explain unique vari-
4.4 per cent smoked cigarettes less often than
ance was seeking medical attention.
weekly, 0.8 per cent smoked cigarettes at least
weekly and only 3.2 per cent smoked daily. As
seen in Table 2, smoking status was not signifi- Discussion
cantly correlated to body appreciation. Although
body appreciation was found to be higher in This study examined the relationship between
non-smokers (M = 3.24, SD = 0.76) than smok- positive body image and a range of health-
ers (M = 3.05, SD = 0.91), an independent sam- promoting and health-compromising behav-
ples t-test revealed this difference was not iours. While negative body image or body
significant, t(242) = 0.99, p = .32. dissatisfaction has previously been found to be
34 Journal of Health Psychology 21(1)

Table 3. Summary of hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting health behaviours from body
appreciation and body dissatisfaction.

Step 1 Step 2

Body dissatisfaction Body appreciation

R2 F R2change Fchange
Health-promoting behaviours
Sun protection .008 1.83 .034 8.36**
Screening behaviours
Skin screening .018 4.28* .018 4.48*
Breast screening .015 3.69 .003 0.77
Pap tests .003 0.82 .008 1.92
Medical attention .044 11.07** .004 0.99
Health-compromising behaviours
Weight-loss behaviours .118 32.18*** .049 14.15***
Alcohol consumption .021 4.54* .002 0.37
Cigarette smoking .001 0.33 .000 0.00
*p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

associated with some health behaviours, this dissatisfaction (Chait etal., 2009; Risica etal.,
was the first study to investigate how positive 2008). Given that Australia has the highest inci-
body image related to health behaviours beyond dence of skin cancer in the world (International
eating. Specifically, body appreciation was Agency for Research on Cancer, 2008) and that
found to be positively related to sun protection, skin cancers account for the overwhelming
skin screening and seeking medical attention, majority of new cancers diagnosed in Australia
and negatively related to weight-loss behav- every year (Cancer Council Australia, 2012b),
iours. On the other hand, body appreciation was these findings suggest a potential avenue for
not significantly related to breast screening, pap interventions and campaigns specifically aimed
tests or alcohol-related or smoking behaviours. at young women to increase sun protection
The finding for weight-loss behaviours con- behaviours and screening for skin cancer. Such
firms previous results demonstrating a negative campaigns might choose to focus on the bene-
association between positive body image and fits of sun protection and skin screening for the
unhealthy eating behaviour (e.g. Augustus- body, as opposed to emphasising appearance-
Horvath and Tylka, 2011; Avalos etal., 2005; based negative consequences of not engaging in
Avalos and Tylka, 2006; Langdon and Petracca, these behaviours (e.g. developing wrinkles).
2010). However, the relationships found Although not significant, the correlations
between body appreciation and other health between body appreciation and breast screening
behaviours are novel. and receiving pap tests lay in the predicted
This study found links between body appre- direction. It may be that breast screening is not
ciation and both skin screening and sun protec- an appropriate measure in a young sample given
tion which have not previously been reported. that recommendations are strongly geared
Importantly, the results also demonstrated that towards women aged 40 years and over
body appreciation contributed unique variance (Department of Health and Ageing, 2012).
in sun protection and skin screening, over However, no significant relationship between
and above that previously reported for body body dissatisfaction and breast screening in a
Andrew et al. 35

more diverse sample of older women was Stice and Shaw, 2003), the present study found
reported in a previous study (Chait etal., 2009). no links between body image and cigarette
Thus, the lack of significant association may be smoking. However, this result is not surprising
due to the nature of breast screening which given the very low proportion of smokers in the
involves a tactile rather than visual inspection present sample (8.4%).
of a relatively small and specific area of the In general, while body appreciation and
body (Chait etal., 2009). This contrasts with body dissatisfaction were correlated with each
screening for skin abnormalities which requires other and were found to be related to some of
close visual attention directed to the whole sur- the same variables, the pattern of correlations
face of the body, consistent with the positive was not the same. In particular, the overall pat-
correlation found here between positive body tern suggests that positive body image might be
image and skin, but not breast, screening. more related to health-promoting behaviours,
Similar to DeMaria etal. (2011), no relation- while negative body image might be more
ship existed between body appreciation (or related to health-compromising behaviours.
body dissatisfaction) and cervical cancer Future research might usefully investigate this
screening. This studys findings add to the small interesting proposition. In addition, the regres-
body of work examining cancer screening, but sion analyses indicated that body appreciation
support Ridolfi and Crowthers (2012) call for was able to explain unique variance in some of
more research in order to make definitive con- the health behaviours, beyond that explained by
clusions about the nature of the relationships body dissatisfaction. The unique contribution of
between body image and cancer screening positive body image to sun protection, skin
behaviours. screening and weight-loss behaviours presents
More generally, body appreciation was pos- convincing evidence that body appreciation
itively related to seeking medical attention does play a role in these health behaviours.
when required, demonstrating a potential role Nevertheless, further research needs to compre-
for positive body image in overall motivation hensively address the conceptual difference
to enhance health. Seeking medical attention is between positive body image and the absence
a more global and far-reaching behaviour than of body dissatisfaction by examining multiple
specific cancer screening, and can contribute measures of the two constructs and how they
to the detection and prevention of a range of relate to a range of social, health and well-being
diseases. In addition, general practitioners variables.
have the ability to encourage regular screening This studys findings have some practical
practices and to promote a whole range of implications. Given that body dissatisfaction is
health behaviours in people who seek profes- now viewed as normative among young women
sional advice for medical problems (Dobson (Rodin etal., 1985) and that they are confronted
etal., 2012). with flawless media images portraying the thin
The results support previous links reported ideal on virtually a daily basis (Levine and
between body dissatisfaction and alcohol con- Chapman, 2011), it is possible that strategies
sumption (Littleton etal., 2005; Nelson etal., that seek to enhance positive body image may
2009), but interestingly no relationship with prove more successful than strategies that
body appreciation was found. Alcohol intake is attempt to reduce body dissatisfaction. In par-
an important health issue in Australia, and is the ticular, if girls and women can be explicitly
focus of various campaigns as well as specific encouraged to accept and appreciate all parts of
health guidelines. Our results suggest that tar- their body, including its flaws, they should be
geting body dissatisfaction in health initiatives better able to withstand media pressures.
that aim to reduce risky alcohol consumption One way that women and girls might actively
may be useful. Contrary to some previous find- learn to develop their appreciation for their bod-
ings (Clark etal., 2005; Kendzor etal., 2009; ies is by engaging in metacognitive acceptance
36 Journal of Health Psychology 21(1)

techniques which have begun to show some mainly young Caucasian university students,
success for general body image (Atkinson and and so results may not generalise to other groups
Wade, 2012). Such techniques emphasise that of women. Second, the self-report nature of the
thoughts, feelings and physical sensations are to questionnaire may also have limited partici-
be observed and experienced but not judged or pants ability to accurately remember and report
actively modified (Baer, 2003). Thus, they may the degree to which they did or did not perform
serve to prevent or ameliorate womens ten- health behaviours. Third, the just below accept-
dency to engage in social comparison or rumi- able internal reliability for the sun protection
nation about their appearance. More broadly, measure means that results for this variable
engaging in mindful meditation may assist in should be viewed with caution. Finally, the
the accurate and early detection of bodily needs cross-sectional design means that it is not pos-
or changes (Bishop etal., 2004). Another way sible to determine causal or temporal relation-
that women and girls might increase body ships between the different variables. Although,
appreciation is to participate in embodying as suggested by Tylka (2011), it is more logical
activities, that is, activities in which the mind to treat health behaviours as an outcome of pos-
and body are interconnected (Piran, 2002). sessing positive body image, it is also theoreti-
These include organised sports and other physi- cally possible that engaging in healthy
cal pursuits such as rock climbing or yoga, behaviours could lead to the development of
which are not self-objectifying (e.g. Prichard positive body image. Alternatively, there might
and Tiggemann, 2008), and are postulated as be a third variable that explains both. Future
potential precursors to positive body image research should employ longitudinal designs
(Menzel and Levine, 2011). Encouraging that track the development of both positive body
women to discuss exercise and physical activity image and health-related behaviours over some
with peers may also foster positive body image, time for a more definitive casual conclusion.
as those women who engage in more exercise Despite its limitations, to our knowledge
(as opposed to appearance) related conversa- this is the first study to examine non-eating
tions have been shown to hold more functional health-related outcomes of positive body
(as opposed to objectifying) views of their body image. In particular, the results demonstrate
(Wasylkiw and Butler, 2013). that positive body image is linked to the
Taken together, the findings allow us to add health-promoting behaviours of sun protec-
womens physical health to the list of potential tion, skin screening and seeking medical atten-
benefits associated with positive body image. tion, and negatively associated with the
Accordingly, they suggest that targeting posi- health-compromising behaviour of unhealthy
tive body image might be one way to effect tan- weight loss. These findings have both theoreti-
gible improvements in womens health. Thus, cal and practical implications: first, in expand-
public health and other interventions designed ing the scope of positive body image, and
to modify health-related behaviours, in particu- second, in identifying a new target for promot-
lar health-promoting behaviours, might use- ing healthy behaviours.
fully incorporate positive body image into their
protocols. Public health campaigns commonly
deliver messages about the harmful conse- Funding
quences of an unhealthy behaviour (known as This research received no specific grant from any
fear appeals) rather than offering a positive funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-
behaviour as an alternative (Rice and Atkin, profit sectors.
2001). Reframing these in the positive direction
might improve their effectiveness. References
There are some limitations to this study that Alegria Drury CA and Louis M (2002) Exploring
should be noted. First, the sample comprised the association between body weight, stigma of
Andrew et al. 37

obesity, and health care avoidance. Journal of Cancer Council Australia (2012a) No tan is worth
the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners dying for. Available at: http://www.cancer.
14(12): 554561. org.au/preventing-cancer/sun-protection/cam-
Atkinson MJ and Wade TD (2012) Impact of meta- paigns-and-events/no-tan-is-worth-dying-for.
cognitive acceptance on body dissatisfaction html (accessed 1 March 2013).
and negative affect: Engagement and efficacy. Cancer Council Australia (2012b) Skin cancer.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Available at: http://www.cancer.org.au/about-
80(3): 416425. cancer/types-of-cancer/skin-cancer.html
Augustus-Horvath CL and Tylka TL (2011) The (accessed 4 February 2013).
acceptance model of intuitive eating: A com- Cancer Council Australia (2012c) Slip, slop, slap,
parison of women in emerging adulthood, early seek and slide. Available at: http://www.cancer.
adulthood, and middle adulthood. Journal of org.au/preventing-cancer/sun-protection/cam-
Counseling Psychology 58(1): 110125. paigns-and-events/slip-slop-slap-seek-slide.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2011) html (accessed 4 March 2013).
2010 National Drug Strategy Household Cash TF (2000) The Multidimensional Body-
Survey Report (Drug statistics series no. 25. Self Relations Questionnaire. Users manual.
Cat. no. PHE 145). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Available at: http://www.body-images.com
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (accessed 1 March 2013).
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) Cash TF, Fleming EC, Alindogan J, etal. (2002)
Australias Health 2012 (Australias health Beyond body image as a trait: The development
series no.13. Cat. no. AUS 156). Canberra, and validation of the Body Image States Scale.
ACT, Australia: Australian Institute of Health Eating Disorders 10(2): 103113.
and Welfare. Chait SR, Thompson JK and Jacobsen PB (2009)
Avalos LC and Tylka TL (2006) Exploring a model Relationship of body image to breast and skin
of intuitive eating with college women. Journal self-examination intentions and behaviors.
of Counseling Psychology 53(4): 486497. Body Image 6(1): 6063.
Avalos L, Tylka TL and Wood-Barcalow N (2005) Clark MA, Rogers ML, Armstrong GF, etal. (2009)
The Body Appreciation Scale: Development Comprehensive cancer screening among unmar-
and psychometric evaluation. Body Image 2(3): ried women aged 4075 years: Results from the
285297. cancer screening project for women. Journal of
Baer RA (2003) Mindfulness training as a clini- Womens Health 18(4): 451459.
cal intervention: A conceptual and empiri- Clark MM, Croghan IT, Reading S, etal. (2005)
cal review. Clinical Psychology: Science and The relationship of body image dissatisfaction
Practice 10(2): 125143. to cigarette smoking in college students. Body
Begg SJ, Vos T, Barker B, etal. (2008) Burden of Image 2(3): 263270.
disease and injury in Australia in the new mil- Commonwealth Department of Veterans Affairs
lennium: Measuring health loss from diseases, (2003) AUDIT (Alcohol Screen). Available at:
injuries and risk factors. Medical Journal of http://at-ease.dva.gov.au/therightmix/resources/
Australia 188(1): 3640. for-health-professionals/ (accessed 10 June
Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, etal. (2004) 2012).
Mindfulness: A proposed operational defini- DeMaria AL, Hollub AV and Herbenick A (2011)
tion. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice Using genital self-image, body image, and
11(3): 230241. sexual behaviors to predict gynecological exam
Brown TA, Cash TF and Mikulka PJ (1990) behaviors of college women. The Journal of
Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor Sexual Medicine 8(9): 24842492.
analysis of the body-self relations question- Department of Health and Ageing (2009) National
naire. Journal of Personality Assessment 55(1 Cervical Screening Program. Available at:
2): 135144. http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/
Cancer Council Australia (2007) Position Statement: screening/publishing.nsf/Content/cervical-
Screening and Early Detection of Skin Cancer. about (accessed 4 February 2013).
Sydney, NSW, Australia: Cancer Council Department of Health and Ageing (2012)
Australia. BreastScreen Australia Program. Available at:
38 Journal of Health Psychology 21(1)

http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/ and Prevention. New York: The Guilford Press,


screening/publishing.nsf/Content/breastscreen- pp. 101109.
about (accessed 4 February 2013). Littleton H, Radecki Breitkopf C and Berenson A
Dobbinson S, Wakefield M, Hill D, etal. (2008) (2005) Body image and risky sexual behaviors:
Prevalence and determinants of Australian ado- An investigation in a tri-ethnic sample. Body
lescents and adults weekend sun protection Image 2(2): 193198.
and sunburn, summer 20032004. Journal of Lobera IJ and Ros PB (2011) Spanish version of
the American Academy of Dermatology 59(4): the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS) for ado-
602614. lescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Dobson A, Byles J, Brown W, etal. (2012) 14(1): 411420.
Adherence to Guidelines: Findings from the Menzel JE and Levine MP (2011) Embodying experi-
Australian Longitudinal Study on Womens ences and the promotion of positive body image:
Health. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian The example of competitive athletics. In: Calogero
Department of Health and Ageing. RM, Tantleff-Dunn S and Thompson JK (eds) Self-
Fredrickson BL and Roberts T-A (1997) Objectification in Women: Causes, Consequences,
Objectification Theory: Toward understanding and Counteractions. Washington, DC: American
womens lived experiences and mental health Psychological Association, pp. 163186.
risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21(2): National Health and Medical Research Council
173206. (2009) Australian Guidelines to Reduce Health
Frisn A and Holmqvist K (2010) What characterizes Risks from Drinking Alcohol. Canberra, ACT,
early adolescents with a positive body image? Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
A qualitative investigation of Swedish girls and National Health and Medical Research Council
boys. Body Image 7(3): 205212. (2013) Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra,
Giovannelli TS, Cash TF, Henson JM, etal. (2008) ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
The measurement of body-image dissatisfac- Neff KD (2003) Self-compassion: An alternative
tionsatisfaction: Is rating importance impor- conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward
tant? Body Image 5(2): 216223. oneself. Self and Identity 2: 85101.
Grogan S (1999) Body Image: Understanding Body Nelson MC, Lust K, Story M, etal. (2009) Alcohol
Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children. use, eating patterns, and weight behaviors in
London: Routledge. a university population. American Journal of
Homan KJ and Cavanaugh BN (2013) Perceived Health Behavior 33(3): 227237.
relationship with God fosters positive body Ogden J (2003) The Psychology of Eating. Oxford:
image in college women. Journal of Health Blackwell Publishing.
Psychology 18(12): 15291539. ORiordan DL, Field AE, Geller AC, etal. (2006)
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2008) Frequent tanning bed use, weight concerns,
World Cancer Report 2008. Lyon: International and other health risk behaviors in adolescent
Agency for Research on Cancer. females (United States). Cancer Causes &
Jensen JD and Moriarty CM (2008) Psychosocial Control 17(5): 679686.
factors associated with skin self-exam perfor- Piran N (2002) Embodiment: A mosaic of inquiries
mance. Journal of American College Health in the area of body weight and shape preoccu-
56(6): 701705. pation. In: Abbey SM (ed.) Ways of Knowing
Kendzor DE, Adams CE, Stewart DW, etal. (2009) in and through the Body: Diverse Perspectives
Cigarette smoking is associated with body on Embodiment. Welland, ON, Canada: Soliel
shape concerns and bulimia symptoms among Publishing Inc., pp. 211214.
young adult females. Eating Behaviors 10(1): Prichard I and Tiggemann M (2008) Relations
5658. among exercise type, self-objectification, and
Langdon SW and Petracca G (2010) Tiny dancer: body image in the fitness centre environment:
Body image and dancer identity in female mod- The role of reasons for exercise. Psychology of
ern dancers. Body Image 7(4): 360363. Sport and Exercise 9(6): 855866.
Levine MP and Chapman K (2011) Media influences Pruzinsky T and Cash TF (2002) Understanding
on body image. In: Cash TF and Smolak L (eds) body images: Historical and contemporary
Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Practice, perspectives. In: Cash TF and Pruzinsky T
Andrew et al. 39

(eds) Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Tylka TL (2006) Development and psychometric eval-
Research, and Clinical Practice. New York: uation of a measure of intuitive eating. Journal of
The Guilford Press, pp. 312. Counseling Psychology 53(2): 226240.
Rice RE and Atkin CK (2001) Public Communication Tylka TL (2011) Positive psychology perspectives
Campaigns (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: on body image. In: Cash TF and Smolak L (eds)
SAGE. Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Practice,
Ridolfi DR and Crowther JH (2012) The link and Prevention (2nd edn). New York: The
between womens body image disturbances Guilford Press, pp. 5664.
and body focused cancer screening behav- Wasylkiw L and Butler NA (2013) Body talk among
iors: A critical review of the literature and a undergraduate women: Why conversations
new integrated model for women. Body Image about exercise and weight loss differentially
10(2): 149162. predict body appreciation. Journal of Health
Risica PM, Weinstock MA, Rakowski W, etal. Psychology. Epub ahead of print 16 May. DOI:
(2008) Body satisfaction effect on thorough 10.1177/1359105313483155.
skin self-examination. American Journal of Wasylkiw L, MacKinnon AL and MacLellan
Preventive Medicine 35(1): 6872. AM (2012) Exploring the link between self-
Rodin J, Silberstein L and Striegel-Moore R (1985) compassion and body image in university
Women and weight: A normative discontent. In: women. Body Image 9(2): 236245.
Sondregger TB (ed.) Psychology and Gender. Williams EF, Cash TF and Santos MT (2004)
Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. Positive and negative body image: Precursors,
267307. correlates, and consequences. In: 38th annual
Stice E and Shaw H (2003) Prospective relations meeting of the association for the advancement
of body image, eating and affective distur- of behavior therapy, New Orleans, LA, 1821
bances to smoking onset in adolescent girls: November.
How Virginia slims. Journal of Consulting and Wood-Barcalow NL, Tylka TL and Augustus-
Clinical Psychology 71(1): 129135. Horvath CL (2010) But I Like My Body:
Stice E and Shaw HE (2002) Role of body dissat- Positive body image characteristics and a holis-
isfaction in the onset and maintenance of eat- tic model for young-adult women. Body Image
ing pathology: A synthesis of research findings. 7(2): 106116.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 53(5): World Health Organization (2013) BMI classifi-
985993. cation. Available at: http://apps.who.int/bmi/
Tiggemann M and McCourt A (2013) Body appre- index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html (accessed 30
ciation in adult women: Relationships with January 2013).
age and body satisfaction. Body Image 10(4): Yoo J-J and Kim H-Y (2012) Adolescents body-
624627. tanning behaviours: Influences of gender, body
Tribole E and Resch E (1995) Intuitive Eating: A mass index, sociocultural attitudes towards
Recovery Book for the Chronic Dieter. New appearance and body satisfaction. International
York: St. Martins Press. Journal of Consumer Studies 36(3): 360366.

You might also like