Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v.
CASE NO: 1-
14cv00093
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA aka BARRY SOETORO; JUDGE:
HONORABLE TED STEWART
DNC,
OFC,
DEFENDANT.
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, pro se, Cody Robert Judy, and submits to this Court this
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION with an AFFADAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION for
RECONSIDERATION attached.
The Plaintiff herein submits an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for the Courts
consideration on the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
1
Cody Robert Judy
3037 So. Ogden Ave.
Suite #1
Ogden, Utah 84401
Pro se
Ph: 801-497-6655
Email: cody@codyjudy.us
codyjudy@hotmail.com
Web: www.codyjudy.us
v.
CASE NO: 1-
14cv00093
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA aka BARRY SOETORO; JUDGE:
HONORABLE TED STEWART
DNC,
OFC,
DEFENDANT.
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, pro se, Cody Robert Judy, and submits to this Court a
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION with this AFFADAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION.
FACTS ON THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ie. on THE MOTION FOR RELIEF OF
JUDGEMENT
2
1- On January 26th, 2017 a MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT (pursuant to
Rule 60) was filed and served with a witness of mailing certificate upon
Defendant(s) latest known addresses.
2- The MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGMENT was docketed by the Court on January
27, 2017.
3- Accordingly, Defendants have a 30 day time window to respond to the Motion
in the affirmative or in objection for dispositive motions, and no such
Response has been noticed by the Court or Plaintiff of Record.
4- The Courts ORDER denying PLAINTIFFS Motion was signed a day premature
of the 30 Day Response and four days premature if Defendants were given 3
days mailing time.
5- Plaintiffs AFFADAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION was filed the same day as
the ORDER denying the Motion, and docketed after, so it is unlikely the Court
was given time for consideration of the 8 page Affidavit in Support filed with
the Notice For Judgement.
6- Thus both the Plaintiff and Defendants were in essence affected adversely by
the pre-mature Court Order denying the Motion for Relief of Judgement.
7- Plaintiff asks that MOTION be Reconsidered with this MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION and the Affidavit in Support filed with the NOTICE FOR
JUDGEMENT.
8- Mr. Judy now ask the Court for relief of the circumstances that warrant this
MOTION FOR RECONSIDEREATION.
9- Mr. Judy asks the Court to sign his proposed/OR THE COURTs own/, ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE.
3
c. https://votesmart.org/candidate/biography/50479/cody-
judy#.WK3QBNIrKJA
d. 2008 last entry
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_candidates_in_the_United_State
s_presidential_election,_2008
e. FEC RECORD 2012 2016
http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do?
candidateCommitteeId=P20003372&tabIndex=3
f. CANDIDATE COMPARISON http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/?
compare=Judy
a. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61
642
5- That this Court now holds in its palm of Judgement, with this Case in
the Plaintiff, the only Presidential Candidate in the United States of
America to defend the [natural born Citizen] clause requirement in the
U.S. Constitution Article II. ,Section 1, C-5, with a bi-partisan stand
across political party lines of Republicans and Democrats who
represent a majority in the United States political arena across three
presidential elections.
6- That because Mr. Judy is the only Presidential Candidate in the United
States to have represented the U.S. Constitutions declaration that the
Office of the President be a [Citizen] at the time of the Adoption of the
Constitution and thereafter a [natural born Citizen] ie. (Born in the U.S.
to Citizen Parents see PRECEDENT SCOTUS CASE: Minor v. Happersett
4
88 U.S. 162 (1875) ), that an unbiased Claim for Equality and Fairness
under the Standard Rules of the Race in the Constitution for the Office
of the President has been made as a Civil Right for a Presidential
Candidate.
5
Office was the result of a cover-up that amounted to a collective
criminal enterprise in fraud upon the Voters of the United States of
America. A forgery has been committed in the presentation as Mr.
Obamas long form birth certificate which is fabricated, as represented
by the new evidence presented to this Court in the lawful investigation
of duly sworn agents of the law and professional experts for the Court.
a. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-47 FRAUD
AND FALSE STATEMENTS
b. Whoever, knowingly and with intent to defraud the United States, or
any agency thereof, possesses any false, altered, forged, or
counterfeited writing or document for the purpose of enabling
another to obtain from the United States, or from any agency,
officer or agent thereof, any sum of money, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
c. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103322, title XXXIII,
330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
d. 18 U.S. Code 1028 - Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information
i. a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of
this section (1) knowingly and without lawful authority
produces an identification document, authentication feature,
or a false identification document;
ii. (2) knowingly transfers an identification document,
authentication feature, or a false identification document
knowing that such document or feature was stolen or
produced without lawful authority; (6) knowingly possesses
an identification document or authentication feature that is
or appears to be an identification document or authentication
feature of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an
event designated as a special event of national significance
which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing
that such document or feature was stolen or produced
without such authority; (8) knowingly traffics in false or
actual authentication features for use in false identification
documents, document-making implements, or means of
identification; shall be punished as provided in subsection
6
iii. (b) of this section. (b) The punishment for an offense under
subsection (a) of this section is
(1) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under
this title or imprisonment for not more than 15 years, or
both, if the offense is
(A) the production or transfer of an identification document,
authentication feature, or false identification document that
is or appears to be
(i) an identification document or authentication feature
issued by or under the authority of the United States; or
(ii) a birth certificate, or a drivers license or personal
identification card;
7
b. Is this Court bias to the importance of each Parents [inherited
citizenship] giving more diligence and honor to a mother than a
father and by what Fairness and Equality does that represent?
c. And, most importantly, does this Court by its lack of honor to law
enforcement people duly deputized, conclusive forensic evidence
by experts in document fraud and forgery, and the Justice that
comes when Plaintiffs bring righteously the Claims for Relief for the
violations of protected Rights under the laws, that the Courts very
purpose was created to uphold, find so simply, it necessary to act
as the Defendants Criminal and Civil Lawyer because they fail to
Respond?
10- When will Mr. Judy have his rights represented by the Court? The
United States of America has undergone a peaceful transition of power,
however, Mr. Judy in his motion before this Court has brought up many
instances of a continued grievance and cost affecting himself and
certainly affecting Voters as Tax-Payers; and of course the integrity of
our whole Election procedure and form of Government in a three
BRANCHES of equal checks and balances. Mr. Judy has presented this
Court with Law and Claims upon which relief can be granted
meritoriously as well as evidence why it should grant the relief of
judgement calling this action frivolous, especially in the face of Law
Enforcement Evidence. SEE: MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT
11- While this Court will hear Mr. Judys Motion, today, the threat of an
upheaval for ousting a sitting (defacto) President, put in with a hood-
wink and pass on crime, is passed with the peaceful transition of the
office of President. This Case yet continues to represents the
grievance of an unseated usurper based upon the limitations of two
four year terms, another Constitutional Rein checking the Office of
President. With that threat gone, and the statute of limitations yet
open for fraud and forgery and distribution felonies of identity theft
and false representation, U.S. History can and still deserves to be
made right. As well the proper address of an illegal occupant signing
8
that which demands a [natural born Citizen], as well the illegal cover
up in the Cartel of Corporations formed to avoid accountability at the
expense of U.S. Elections.
12- The Framers had such a circumstance come upon them also in the
NATURALIZATION ACT of 1790 when they realized the conundrum ill
served in the NATURALIZATION ACT of 1795 and took out [natural born]
leaving the difference acknowledged as [Citizen]. Though five years
had passed, they realized no [naturalization ACT] could claim
jurisdiction on [the laws of nature and natures God] in [natural born
Citizen]. Certainly it was wholly absurd to think about any [natural born
Citizen] born under a Law of Jurisdiction before that Jurisdiction even
existed, and conversely no [Citizen] could even be Adopted by a new
lawful jurisdiction before it was recognized OFFICIALLY.
13- In summary Mr. Judy has defended the United States of Americas
Greatest Privilege and Right; that to have a [President born in the U.S.
to U.S. Citizen Parents ]representing a passage right of TIME in the
Declaration of a New Nation born in the United States of America by
her Citizens of allegiance. It is true, the United States of America was a
melting pot of all races, colors, and creeds, but it is a Nations
fundamental right to place a criteria upon its offices of governance.
9
b. The concentration of Power in the Executive Branch is uniquely
different than the diluted power of Judges in the Judicial Branch or
the host of Representatives and Senators in the U.S. House and U.S.
Senate as the Legislature.
14- Mr. Judy did not ask Mr. Obama to falsify his long form birth certificate,
nor did the Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. That decision made
50 months after Mr. Obama declared his intent to run for Office was
made all by Mr. Obama himself, but of course there were tell-tale signs
and hints others knew and assisted who also bear responsibility in the
usurpation; like Representative Nancy Pelosi who signed two different
forms stating Barack Obama was an eligible Candidate under the U.S.
Constitution for the Democratic Party as was very well described in the
original complaint.
15- This action brought to the Bar of Justice asked for a Right or Wrong
Judgement on those actions of fraud and forgery with the motive of
usurpation in mind as motive. If the Court defends those illegal actions
in the light of the U.S. Constitution it simply becomes a mockery of
Justice and a laughing stock of the world who will see it. It puts a stake
through the heart of Justice and in short is an insistence that the Court
is irrelevant itself and no champion of Civil Rights when it comes to
10
crime and injustice upon [We the People] of this Republic for which we
stand.
17- Mr. Judy as Plaintiff, asks the Court to grant the MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION in signing the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for a RELIEF
OF JUDGEMENT on the basis of serving Justice, fine, and hold the
DEFENDANTS responsible and accountable for the whole sums as it
directs, that the burden of relieving the Judgement will be upon them
who are the perpetrators and alleged criminals in this action declaring
as much with their failure to Respond honorably. Mr. Judy request all
other relief the Court might find honorably and if the Court would like,
Mr. Judy is certainly willing to argue in person if the Court would on its
own merit call for a Hearing. Mr. Judy simply cannot predict the mind of
this Court or its Judgement on which direction to proceed, but he has
submitted the Evidence responsible for Facts so the Court is not
embarrassed by a dereliction of Justice to the Facts, or seen in
administering criminal enterprise and illegal action upon the people.
18- Sworn and Signed this 27th Day of February, 2017
________________________________/s/ Cody Robert Judy
11
Affiant: Cody Robert Judy attorney pro se
19- NOTARY:
In the Weber County of the State of Utah:
Sworn and Subscribed to me on this ____ Day of _______, 2017.
NOTORAY OF PUBLIC:
Signature: STAMP:
12
AFFADAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF to the
following via first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid:
13