Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary This review examines workplace identity conicts, offering three primary contributions. First, it reconciles
hitherto fragmented perspectives on identity conicts to offer an integrative and cross-level perspective on
identity conicts at work. Second, it elucidates an important distinction between two types of identity conicts,
namely intra-unit and inter-unit conicts, also outlining the different roots, moderators, and reconciliations of
these conict types. Third, it proposes an alternative perspective on identity conicts as constructive forces for
individual and organizational change, also stressing the importance of context and content in shaping identity
conict outcomes. Thus, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of identity conicts in the workplace,
clarifying the current state of the science and offering new directions for future research. Copyright 2013
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: identity conict; cross-level; change
Every individual is a meeting ground for many different allegiances, and sometimes these loyalties conict with
one another and confront the person who harbors them with difcult choices.
Amin Maalouf (2003)
Identity represents an individuals answer to the question who am I? or a collectives answer to the question
who are we? (Pratt & Foreman, 2000). Individuals and groups dene themselves according to their central and
distinctive characteristics, including the values and beliefs they advocate and the expectations that they hold (Albert
& Whetten, 1985). Research has testied to the many different types of workplace identities, including career
identities, team identities, professional and organizational identities (Ashforth, Harrison, & Corley, 2008). In
addition, it has demonstrated the criticality of such identities for workplace outcomes, including motivation,
attitudes, behavior, and performance (Riketta, 2005; van Knippenberg, 2000).
However, attention has increasingly turned to the wider consequences of identity at work, including the potential
for identity conicts in the workplace. Identity conict is dened as conict between the values, beliefs, norms and
demands inherent in individual and group identities (Ashforth & Mael, 1989, p. 29). The last decade has seen a
burgeoning literature focusing on this topic, providing rich insights into the role and impact of work-related identity
conicts at individual, group, and organizational levels. This research testies to the pervasive inuence of identity
conicts in our workplaces. Indeed, the signicant and often deleterious effects of identity conicts have been
widely documented in empirical studies (Glynn, 2000; Voss, Cable, & Voss, 2006), while theoretical models place
identity conicts at the center of dysfunctional inter-group dynamics within organizations (Fiol, Pratt, & OConnor,
2009). Crucially, researchers also predict that identity-based conicts are only set to increase, as the multiplicity and
complexity of workplace environments and roles intensify (Fiol et al., 2009).
*Correspondence to: Kate E. Horton, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Room L04-97, 3062 PA
Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: khorton@rsm.nl
However, at present, the research on identity conicts remains scattered and disjointed, providing a fragmented
picture of the consequences of conicts at work. A systematic investigation of the nature and roots of different
conict types is also missing, as is an understanding of the dynamic drivers of identity conicts over time. Instead,
researchers typically operate within narrow disciplinary and methodological boundaries, taking a myopic approach
to identity conicts within their academic niche. Within this context, there is little reection on potential connections
across methodological traditions, disciplinary silos, and levels of analysis.
Addressing these limitations, our review offers three primary contributions to the eld. First, we identify two
different types of work-related identity conicts, integrating evidence from different traditions and domains. In
particular, we distinguish between intra-unit identity conicts (i.e., those that occur within an individual or
collective) and inter-unit identity conicts (i.e., those that occur across individuals or collectives). We start by
reviewing evidence of these types of conicts at individual, group, and organizational levels. We then draw on
the cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957) and the social identity approach (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner,
1985) to shed light on the underlying mechanisms, triggers, and reconciliations of intra-unit and inter-unit conicts
within our workplaces.
Second, we examine the nature of cross-level identity conicts at work, outlining important interconnections
between identity conicts at different levels of an organizational structure. This discussion highlights the importance
of integrative and cross-level approaches to identity conicts, also implying that our current tendency to work within
disciplinary silos is highly detrimental to the advancement of the eld.
Third, we consider the dynamic nature of identity conicts, examining the processes through which identity
conicts become manifest and are reconciled over time. This discussion highlights the role of change as a primary
cause and consequence of identity conicts at work, demonstrating that while internal and external changes trigger
identity conict, identity conict is itself a critical driver of workplace development and change.
Before delving into the main topic of our review, we start by examining the foundations of identity research,
including the different levels of self-representation and analysis that lie at the heart of our integrative framework.
1
At the individual level, levels of self-representation and analysis are synonymous
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
occur across individuals and groups (labeled inter-unit conicts). We then go on to explore the different roots,
moderators, and consequences of these types of conicts within the workplace (Table 1).
Description Conicts in the values, beliefs, norms, and Conicts in the values, beliefs, norms,
expectations held by a single individual and expectations held by different individuals
or collective identity or groups within a collective identity
Examples
Organizational level Hybrid organizational identities (Voisey, 2010) Inter-organizational conictsIJVs
(Li & Hambrick, 2005)
Group level Army medic (Leavitt et al., 2012) Musicians versus board members
ASO (Glynn, 2000)
Individual level Intrapersonal workfamily Interpersonal conictstheater
conicts (Byron, 2005) directors (Voss et al., 2006)
Roots Cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957) Social identity (Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
Uncertainty reduction (Hogg & Terry, 2000) In-group projection model
(Mummendey & Wenzel, 1999)
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
excellence) logics. The most striking example of this type of conict was exposed in the lead up to the Challenger
space shuttle crash, when a senior engineer was urged to take off his engineering hat and put on his management
hat, in making the decision to launch the fated shuttle (Presidential commission, cited in Ashforth & Mael, 1989, p. 30).
At the individual level, intra-unit conicts are synonymous with intrapersonal conicts, representing conicts
in the values, beliefs, norms, and expectations held by a single individual about who I am as a person. Intraper-
sonal conicts thus reect an individuals personal attempts to juggle competing commitments to multiple work
and/or non-work identities. Intrapersonal conicts are rife within modern work environments as workers are
increasingly confronted with a range of workplace identities, as well as a multitude of social and non-work roles
(Ashforth et al., 2008). These identity targets typically span hierarchical and vertical boundaries, representing
different levels of self-representation (e.g., personal, relational, and collective) and different domains (e.g., work
and home). The ability to foster multiple identities is important in sustaining a complex and meaningful sense of
self that is essential to individual well-being (Thoits, 1983). However, research also indicates that an individuals
sense of consistency may be threatened by the enactment of different identities with different behavioral norms
and codes. For example, the demand to be uncompromising, formal, and authoritative in a work domain and
exible, informal, and spontaneous in a non-work domain may be the source of considerable intrapersonal
conict, as an individual attempts to reconcile the divergent claims and expectations of these different roles
(Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985). A vibrant literature attests to the pervasive inuence of workfamily conicts
(Byron, 2005) and workleisure conicts (Staines & OConnor, 1980), as well as conicts between challenging
occupational identities and neglected personal identities (Kreiner, Hollensbe, & Sheep, 2006) and between
ascribed social identities and chosen work roles (Bell, 1990).
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
doctrines, and behavioral norms advocated in Bangladeshi society, which act to contradict and frustrate the
personal career aspirations of ambitious women. At the same time, the authors reveal inherent conicts in
taken for granted elements of modern markets and the rules of the game advocated within Bangladeshi
communities.
As these examples demonstrate, work identities are not performed within a vacuum, and the nature of identities at
organizational and societal levels has a powerful inuence on those working within its boundaries, often acting to
conne and contradict personal and subgroup ambitions. Given the profound effect of nested conicts, we propose
that more research is needed to understand the nature and implications of such conicts for organizations and the
individuals that serve within them.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
In contrast, power and status are important moderators of inter-unit identity conicts. Research shows that when
there are power asymmetries amongst subgroups, the norms of the collective identity are largely dictated by the
dominant or majority group, whereas subgroups claims on a collective may be expected to be more equally
balanced when power is equitably divided (Devos & Banaji, 2005; Li, Xin, & Pillutla, 2002). In addition, research
shows that inter-unit identity conicts may be more ercely fought when they threaten high-status subgroup identi-
ties than when they involve lower status groups (Sachdev & Bourhis, 1991).
Interestingly, the aforementioned accounts also imply that the severity of identity conict may depend upon
whether conicting identities are ascribed, deep-structured, or situated. Specically, when identity conicts impinge
upon ascribed or deep-structured identities, which are chronic and integral to self or group denitions, their effects
may be expected to be particularly invasive and deep-seated.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
Exploring the triggers of identity conict, we nd that external and internal changes are critical in provoking
manifest identity conicts by creating a sense of temporal inconsistency or by bringing existing identity conicts
to the fore. These changes can take the form of identity jolts (i.e., sudden challenges to the existing identity) or
slower processes of adaptation. Evocative accounts of the impact of identity jolts on experiences of intrapersonal
conict are evident in the trauma-based literature, where individuals describe their personal struggles to deal with
events that challenge a valued identity or that cause perceptions of this identity to be fundamentally revised. For
example, Haynie and Shepherd (2011) provide rich accounts of the identity conicts experienced by disabled
servicemen who are faced with building a new self-identity in the wake of a career-shattering injury. Similarly,
Maitlis (2009) highlights the fundamental sense of identity loss experienced by musicians that are forced to end their
profession because of injury. As Matthew, a cellist in Maitlis study comments, one of the amazing things to come
to grips with is the identity crisis of who on earth you are if youre no longer a cellist, having wrapped yourself in
that cover for so long (p. 47).
Intrapersonal conicts may also be activated by desired life changes. Key life events, including parenthood and
promotion, can trigger the reassessment of identities, bringing existing identities into conict with new roles and respon-
sibilities (Ibarra, 1999; Ladge, Clair, & Greenberg, 2012). Of course, there are individual differences in workers
responses to these events, which may be perceived as enriching to one individual but threatening to another.
Changes at an organizational level have also been found to be destabilizing. Indeed, Corley and colleagues
(Corley & Gioia, 2004; Corley, 2004) describe the discrepancies and tensions experienced by employees of a global
technology rm in the wake of an organizational spin-off, in reconciling their organizations emerging identity with
their reminiscences of its past and expected future identities. In addition, research shows that fundamental structural
changes (e.g., new joint ventures and organizational mergers) can be a potent trigger of inter-unit identity conicts
amongst organizational subgroups (Wiesenfeld & Hewlin, 2003).
Identity conicts may also stem from slow processes of internal adaptation, which cause identities to diverge and
disassociate over time. Research has explored how the departure of an identity from its original foundation, a process
termed as identity drift, leads to identity conict as the organizations current identity becomes misaligned with its
past. For example, Drori, Honig, and Sheaffer (2009) describe how an organizations gradual departure from its
starting norms and values alienated those workers still entrenched in the companys starting vision.
Inter-unit identity conicts are also shaped by slow processes of adaptation, which cause units to develop
divergent accounts of their organizations identity over time. Coining the term identity blurring, Ravasi and
Philips (2011) describe how inconsistent rhetoric emanating from two management teams at Bang & Olufsen
(B&O) resulted in ambiguity and misunderstanding amongst different stakeholders. Commenting on the case,
Poulsen (1997, p. 39) writes, for many years B&O sent two different messages, in two different languages, spoken
by two management groups who didnt understand each other. Such ambiguous and contradictory projections
contribute to deviance in the identity norms, values, and visions held by different subgroups, thus inciting inter-unit
conicts over time. Interestingly, as well as illustrating the impact of identity blurring on the development of man-
ifest conict, this example provides a clear portrait of the cascading effects of identity conict at the organizational
level on the emergence of subgroup conicts within the organization.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
reviewing evidence of situated strategies, considering both intra-unit and inter-unit conict resolutions. This discus-
sion highlights overlaps and distinctions in the appropriateness of different strategies for these two conict types.
The cognitive mechanisms of segmenting and organizing are key ways to manage intra-unit identity conicts.
Identities may be temporally segmented so that at different times, different identities are given precedence, or
hierarchically organized, so that priority is given to the most valued identity (Ashforth et al., 2008). For example,
an individual may choose to give precedence to their leadership identity during a performance appraisal and their
engineering identity when working on a project design (temporal segmenting) or to a valued identity (e.g., a
professional sportsperson) at the expense of a peripheral identity (e.g., a media gure; hierarchical organizing).
Identity conicts may also be managed through reinterpreting the nature or value of the identity target. Petriglieri
(2011) outlines the process of identity restructuring through which the meaning or importance of a beheld identity is
modied in response to a perceived threat. For example, a woman may reconcile conicts between a work and a
mother identity by emphasizing a mothers role in nancially supporting her family and providing an active working
role model, as opposed to being fully employed within the family home (Brook, Garcia, & Fleming, 2008). Simi-
larly, Pratt and colleagues document the process by which trainee surgeons reinterpret their professional identities
to better align them with the reality of their daily routines (Pratt, Rockmann, & Kaufmann, 2006), while Ashforth
and Kreiner (1999) examine the ways in which stigmatized occupations are reframed to reconcile negative social
stereotypes with job incumbents perceptions of a valuable work role. Narrative devices are often critical mecha-
nisms in these reevaluation attempts. For example, conicts caused by changes to an organizational identity can
be resolved through the reinterpretation and retrospective rationalization of the past to align it with the present
(Ravasi & Schultz, 2006, p. 451), while personal and organizational myths help maintain a sense of consistency
in ones self and collective identities (Pratt & Foreman, 2000).
Finally, perhaps the most radical or extreme way to manage identity conict is through identity elimination
(Petriglieri, 2011). This process essentially involves shedding (one of) the conicting identities so that it no longer
poses a threat to other valued identities. Interestingly, research also indicates that actors may be proactive in
avoiding conict by actively shunning identities that are likely to undermine or threaten existing identities. For
example, Slay and Smith (2011) propose that individuals with a stigmatized identity may be loath to take on profes-
sional identities that conict with stereotypical prototypes of their cultural group, while gender role stereotypes are
found to shape womens professional self-images and to limit their advancement into counter-stereotypic managerial
positions (Eagly, 1987; Roberts, 2005). In this way, identity conicts not only disrupt actions and identities in the
present but also set the limits for the adoption of new identities.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
the micronance organization, Los Andes, was able to avoid many of the identity clashes experienced by competitor rms
in reconciling development and banking aspects of the organizations hybrid identity. In a similar vein, research has given
much emphasis to the resolution of inter-unit conicts through the activation of a dual identity, in which both valuable
subgroup and super-ordinate identities are fostered (Hornsey & Hogg, 2000). Indeed, Fiol and colleagues (2009) model
of Intractable Identity Conict Resolution cites the promotion of a dual identity as a key mechanism for reducing inter-
group bias, while research based on the Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources (ASPIRe) model highlights
the importance of capitalizing on strong subgroup and collective identities for minimizing intra-organizational conicts
(Peters, Haslam, Ryan, & Fonseca, 2013). Ofcial boundary spanners may also play a role in this process, acting at
the interface of inter-unit conicts to bridge divisions between organizational subgroups (Richter, West, Van Dick, &
Dawson, 2006).
Finally, there is a rich body of evidence highlighting key strategies for avoiding both intra-unit and inter-unit con-
icts during periods of organizational change. Gioia and colleagues propose that by promoting ambiguous visions,
organizations can avoid identity conict by allowing different individuals and subgroups to project their own unique
identity claims on the same amorphous vision (Gioia, Nag, & Corley, 2012), while Clark and colleagues show that
transitional identities may be important in providing a bridge between an organizations past identity and its present,
within the context of a merger (Clark, Gioia, Ketchen, & Thomas, 2010).
Interestingly, although the aforementioned strategies may often be used for both intra-unit and inter-unit conicts,
the suitability of different strategies can depend on the type of (intra-unit or inter-unit) conict encountered. Indeed,
while bridging strategies aimed at fostering dual (subgroup and shared) identities are predicted to reduce inter-unit
identity conicts (Fiol et al., 2009), they are expected to have the reverse effect on intra-unit conicts, increasing the
experience of intrapersonal conict associated with an individuals divided group loyalties (Li et al., 2002). On the
basis of such observations, we call for more research aimed at systematically understanding the applicability and ef-
fectiveness of different reconciliation strategies in resolving intra-unit and inter-unit identity conicts within our
workplaces.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
this work, Meyerson and Tompkins (2007) demonstrate that the dualities and contradictions embodied by the
principal investigator of the Michigan University ADVANCE project were crucial to her effectiveness as a change
agent responsible for advancing gender equity at the university (p. 320). As these examples demonstrate, identity
conicts provide an important impetus and mechanism for challenging existing logics and extending identity bound-
aries to incorporate previously marginalized or excluded groups.
As well as driving bottom-up processes of organizational change, identity conicts may also provoke top-down
change processes aimed at better aligning the organization with the individual employee. For example, changes to
human resource frameworks (Kossek & Ozeki, 1998), the revision of work hours (Ng & Feldman, 2008), the
promotion of a workfamily culture (Lewis, 2003), and the implementation of new socialization and hiring decisions
(Battilana & Dorado, 2010) each represent organization-based change policies aimed at reducing employees
experience of identity conict within their workplace.
While the aforementioned examples focus on nested intra-unit conicts, intrapersonal conicts may also promote
change at an individual level. For example, Petriglieri (2011) describes how identity conict may pave the way for
identity growth by causing an individual to restructure their identity and pursue alternative career and non-career
pathways. Likewise, recent research suggests that discrepancies between an individuals current identity and their
future work self may motivate proactive behavior aimed at achieving ones goals (Strauss, Grifn, & Parker,
2012). In this way, intra-unit identity conicts may provide a key catalyst for career change and development.
The link between inter-unit identity conict and workplace change is less clear. Indeed, many subgroup conicts
are characterized by prolonged competition as groups jostle for positive distinctiveness and superiority over rival
groups (Fiol et al., 2009). Given this nature, it may be expected that inter-unit conicts will be less conducive to
collective development and change.
In addition, we do not presume that intra-unit conicts have predominantly positive effects because of their capac-
ity to drive change, in fact far from it. Research cited at the outset of this paper emphasizes the often catastrophic
consequences of prolonged identity clashes within our workplaces. However, consistent with the sentiments of
Ashforth et al. (2008), this discussion does suggest that by challenging the status quo and offering alternative
pathways for adaptation, identity conict can enhance options for constructive development and change (Dutton,
Roberts, & Bednar, 2010). Specically, although identity conicts may be managed by suppressing discrepancies
and ensuring that conicts remain latent (situated solution), they may also be resolved in a way that challenges existing
identities and fundamentally changes both individuals and organizations (deep-structured solution; Figure 1).
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
Third, we provide a dynamic perspective on identity conict, highlighting the important connection between
conict and workplace development and adaptation. In particular, we elaborate on the role of change as a
primary cause of identity conict and the role of identity conict in developing and shaping individuals and
organizations. Importantly, this review reveals signicant gaps in our understanding of the longitudinal
processes through which identity conicts emerge and are resolved over time. Similarly, we nd little
empirical evidence of the role of individuals in affecting and embedding organizational change. On the basis
of such observations, we echo the sentiments of a number of institutional scholars (e.g., Smets, Morris, &
Greenwood, 2012) by calling for further empirical insights aimed at exploring these important phenomena.
In particular, we see much merit in examining the (bottom-up) mechanisms through which individuals with
conicting or contradictory identities challenge and ultimately change the nature of their organizations. In
addition, we believe that more emphasis should be placed on the (top-down) managerial policies and practices
that may serve to realign and resolve identity conicts within our workplaces.
Although it is beyond the connes of the current paper, we also call for extensions of this work aimed at
exploring possible selves dimensions and explicating how conicts with alternative, provisional, and
desired possible selves may facilitate and disrupt efforts at organizational and personal changes (Obodaru,
2012; Bazerman, Tenbrunsel, & Wade-Benzoni, 1998). The role of conicting possible selves as a driver
of organizational action and individual agency has been highlighted by several authors (Ibarra, 1999; Pratt,
2000). We thus propose that insights from this literature may have important implications in further
theorizing the cyclical link between identity conict and positive identity construction over time (Dutton
et al., 2010).
Our review also draws attention to several important moderators of identity conict, which are deserving of
further research. Implicit in this review is the assumption that context matters. Individual workers are
entrenched within a particular historical, political, and social climate, while institutional boundaries dene
the prevailing norms, values, and logics that organizations must adhere to in any given era. As such, context
plays an important role in shaping identity conicts. We thus suggest that greater attention should be paid to
this underrepresented aspect of OB research (Johns, 2006). Similarly, scant attention has been paid to the
content of identities and how identity conicts may relate to different aspects of the values, norms, and
expectations that individuals and organizations hold. Voss et al. (2006) showed that the impact of theater
directors identity conicts on organizational income and revenue depended on the values that clashed, so
whereas conicts in artistic, achievement, and nancial values were detrimental to performance, conicts in
prosocial values were catastrophic. This suggests that the severity and perhaps even the trigger of identity
conicts may stem from specic content aspects of the conicting identities. Drawing upon these observations,
we propose that understanding the content and context of identities may lie at the heart of predicting and
reconciling identity conicts at work. Further research in this direction would therefore be highly benecial
to the eld.
In sum, our review took an integrative perspective on identity conicts, incorporating insights from different
methodological traditions, levels of analysis, and domains of research. This broad-based perspective is needed to
overcome current disciplinary silos and to advance a comprehensive and cross-level understanding of identity
conicts at work. Given the growing prevalence of identity conicts in modern workplaces, this integrative review
is both timely and important, offering a comprehensive and conceptually driven portrait of the state of the science
and an exciting agenda for future research.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Steffen Giessner and Daan van Knippenberg for their useful comments on an earlier draft of
this manuscript. In addition, we thank IRIOP special issue editor Gerard Hodgkinson and four anonymous reviewers
for their guidance in developing this paper.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
Author biographies
Kate E. Horton is a postdoctoral researcher at RSM, Erasmus University, the Netherlands, where she is working on
the EU-funded Comparative Police Studies in the EU (COMPOSITE) project. Her research interests include
multiple identities and identication, group and inter-group dynamics, organizational change, and workplace
conict.
Petra Saskia Bayerl is a postdoctoral researcher at RSM, Erasmus University, and a member of the COMPOSITE
project. Her current research addresses the link between identity and technology acceptance in organizations,
technology adoption and use with a special focus on social media, coordination in virtual settings, and organizational
change.
Gabriele Jacobs is an associate professor in the Department of Personnel and Organization at RSM, Erasmus
University, since 2000. She is the coordinator of the multidisciplinary, EU-funded COMPOSITE project. Her main
research elds are organizational change, organizational justice, and cross-cultural management.
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and inter-group
discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317334.
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263295.
Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity.
Academy of Management Review, 24, 413434.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 2039.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S., & Corley, K. (2008). Identication in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions.
Journal of Management, 34, 325374.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a days work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of
Management Review, 25, 472491.
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., & Corley, K. G. (2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization
Science, 22, 11441156.
Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M. (2002). Big 5 auditors professional and organizational identication: Consistency or conict?
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21, 2138.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial micronance organiza-
tions. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 14191440.
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with
competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225241.
Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 459477.
Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 121.
Beutell, N. J., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1982). Interrole conict among married women: The inuence of husband and wife charac-
teristics on conict and coping behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 99110.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 17, 475482.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this we?: Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 8393.
Brook, A. T., Garcia, J., & Fleming, M. (2008). The effects of multiple identities on psychological well-being. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 15881600.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169198.
Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., & Hinings, C. R. B. (2007). Interlevel inuences on the reconstruction of professional role identity.
Academy of Management Journal, 50, 15151539.
Clark, S. M., Gioia, D. A., Ketchen, Jr., D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational iden-
tity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 397438.
Corley, K. G. (2004). Dened by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity
and change. Human Relations, 57, 11451177.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 49, 173208.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
Creed, W. E., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work.
Academy of Management Journal, 53, 13361364.
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American = white. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447466.
Drori, I., Honig, B., & Sheaffer, Z. (2009). The life cycle of an internet rm: scripts, legitimacy and identity. Entrepreneurship:
Theory & Practice, 33, 715738.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts M. L. & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive
identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35, 265293.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & OConnor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conicts. Academy of Management Review, 34,
3255.
Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members identication with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13,
618635.
Gioia, D. A., Nag, R., & Corley, K. G. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching
major organizational change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 364375.
Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra.
Organization Science, 11, 285298.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conicts of commitment in a non-
prot organization. Organization Science, 8, 593611.
Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. Administrative Science Quarterly,
2, 281306.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review,
10, 7688.
Gulati, R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of
Management Journal, 50, 775782.
Haynie, J. M., & Shepherd, D. (2011). Toward a theory of discontinuous career transition: Investigating career transitions neces-
sitated by traumatic life events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 501524.
He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identication: A review of the literature and sugges-
tions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38, 335.
Hekman, D. R., Steensma, H. K., Bigley, G. A., & Hereford, J. F. (2009). Effects of organizational and professional identication
on the relationship between administrators social inuence and professional employees adoption of new work behavior. Jour-
nal of Applied Psychology, 94, 13251335.
Hodgkinson, G. P. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identication: A critical realist design science perspective.
Group & Organization Management, 38, 145157.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2011). Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reexion and reection in stra-
tegic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 15001516.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Man-
agement Review, 25, 121140.
Hornsey, M., & Hogg, M. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 4, 143156.
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44, 764791.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386408.
Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conict, policies and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and direc-
tions for organizational behavior human resource research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139149.
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the me among the we identity work and the search for
optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 5, 10311057.
Ladge, J. J., Clair, J. A., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Cross domain identity transitions during liminal periods: Constructing multiple
selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 14491471.
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational
groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325340.
Leavitt, K., Reynolds, S. J., Barnes, C. M., Schilpzand, P., & Hannah, S. T. (2012). Different hats, different obligations: plural
occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 13161333.
Lewis, S. (2003). Flexible working arrangements: Implementation, outcomes and management. In International Review of Indus-
trial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 128.
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conict and disintegration in work
teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794813.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
K. E. HORTON ET AL.
Li, J., Xin, K., & Pillutla, M. (2002). Multi-cultural leadership teams and organizational identication in international joint
ventures. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 320337.
Maalouf, A. (2003). In the name of identity: Violence and the need to belong. New York: Penguin Books.
Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institu-
tional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 819850.
Maitlis, S. (2009). Who am I now? Sensemaking and identity in posttraumatic growth. In L. M. Roberts, & J. E. Dutton (Eds.),
Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organi-
zation Science, 6, 585600.
Meyerson, D., & Tompkins, M. (2007) Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: The case of advancing gender equity at
the University of Michigan. Harvard Journal of Law and gender, 30, 303322.
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup
difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158174.
Nag, R., Corley, K. G. & Gioia, D. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge and practice: Attempting
strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 821847.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). Long work hours: A social identity perspective on meta-analysis data. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 29, 853880.
Obodaru, O. (2012). The self not taken: How alternative selves develop and how they inuence our professional lives. Academy
of Management Review, 37, 3457.
Peters, K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K. & Fonseca, M. (2013). Working with subgroup identities to build organizational identication
and support for organizational strategy: A test of the ASPIRe model. Group and Organizational Management, 38, 128144.
Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individual identities. Academy of Manage-
ment Review, 36, 641662.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296320.
Poulsen, P. T. (1997). Break-point. Copenhagen: Centrum Jyllands-Postens Forlag.
Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad and the ambivalent: Managing identication among Amway distributors. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 45, 456493.
Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of
Management Review, 25, 1842.
Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management
Journal, 40, 862898.
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity
learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235262.
Ravasi, D., & Philips, N. (2011). Strategies of alignment: Organizational identity management and strategic change at Bang &
Olufsen. Strategic Organization, 9, 103135.
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture.
Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433458.
Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10,
465476.
Richter, A., West, M., Van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. (2006). Boundary spanners identication, intergroup contact, and effective
intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 12521269.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358384.
Roberts, L. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Manage-
ment Review, 30, 685711.
Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217233.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal
of Social Psychology, 21, 124.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, D.. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy
of Management Review, 27, 222247.
Slay, H. S., & Smith, D. A. (2011). Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of profes-
sional and stigmatized cultural identities. Human Relations, 64, 85107.
Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to eld: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional
change. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 877904.
Staines, G. L., & OConnor, P. (1980). Conicts among work, leisure and family roles. Monthly Labor Review, 103, 3539.
Strauss, K., Grifn, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career
behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 580598.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job
IDENTITY CONFLICTS AT WORK
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social
psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 483507). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological wellbeing: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis.
American Sociological Review, 48, 174187.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.),
Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 2, (pp. 77122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An Interna-
tional Review, 49, 357371.
Voisey, C. J. (2010). When a Japanese subsidiary is not a Japanese subsidiary: Internationalization as changing organizational
identity and capabilities. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10, 211239.
Voss, Z. G., Cable, D. M., & Voss, G. B. (2006). Organizational identity and rm performance: What happens when leaders dis-
agree about who we are? Organization Science, 17, 741755.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). Splintered identity and organizational change: The predicament of boundary spanning
managers. Identity issues in groups. Research on managing groups and teams, 5, 2752.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/job