Rmxaa..52-1 - Sfsanchezxiii - Pipe3d, A Pipeline To Analyze Integral Field Spectroscopy Data: II

Revista Mexicana de Astronoma y Astrofsica, 52, 171220 (2016)
PIPE3D, A PIPELINE TO ANALYZE INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY DATA: II.

ANALYSIS SEQUENCE AND CALIFA DATAPRODUCTS
S. F. Sanchez1 , E. Perez2 , P. Sanchez-Blazquez3 , R. Garca-Benito2 , H. J. Ibarra-Mede6 , J.J. Gonzalez1 ,

F.F. Rosales-Ortega4 , L. Sanchez-Menguiano2 , Y. Ascasibar5 , T. Bitsakis1 , D. Law6 , M. Cano-Daz1 , C. Lopez-Coba1 ,
R. A. Marino7 , A. Gil de Paz8 , A. R. Lopez-Sanchez9 , J. Barrera-Ballesteros6 , L. Galbany10,11 , D. Mast12,13 , V.
Abril-Melgarejo1 , and A. Roman-Lopes14
Received October 23 2015; accepted February 3 2016
RESUMEN
Copyright 2016: Instituto de Astronoma, Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico
Presentamos P3D, un dataducto de analisis basado en el paquete de ajustes FIT3D,

desarrollado para explorar las propiedades de las poblaciones estelares y el gas ionizado
en datos de espectroscopa de campo integral. P3D se desarrollo para obtener productos
derivados de una forma coherente, facil de distribuir y de comparar independientemente
del origen de los datos, enfocado al analisis de datos de muestreos recientes de espectro-
scopa 3D (e.g., CALIFA, MaNGA y SAMI), y la nueva generacion de estos instrumentos
(e.g., MUSE). A lo largo de este artculo describimos los diferentes pasos incluidos dentro
del analisis de los datos, ilustrandolos mediante los productos derivados para NGC 2916,
observada por CALIFA y P-MaNGA. Como un ejemplo practico del uso de este dataducto
se presentan los datos completos obtenidos para 200 cubos que conforman la segunda dis-
tribucion de datos CALIFA para la configuracion de V500, distribuyendolos de forma libre
a traves de la red. Finalmente, exploramos la hipotesis segun la cual las propiedades de las
poblaciones estelares y el gas ionizado en las galaxias al radio efectivo son representativas
del promedio a lo largo de toda la galaxia, encontrando que, de hecho, e ste es el caso.
ABSTRACT
We present P3D, an analysis pipeline based on the FIT3D fitting tool, developed
to explore the properties of the stellar populations and ionized gas of integral field spec-
troscopy (IFS) data. P3D was created to provide coherent, simple to distribute, and
comparable dataproducts, independently of the origin of the data, focused on the data of
the most recent IFU surveys (e.g., CALIFA, MaNGA, and SAMI), and the last generation
IFS instruments (e.g., MUSE). In this article we describe the different steps involved in the
analysis of the data, illustrating them by showing the dataproducts derived for NGC 2916,
observed by CALIFA and P-MaNGA. As a practical example of the pipeline we present the
complete set of dataproducts derived for the 200 datacubes that comprises the V500 setup
of the CALIFA Data Release 2 (DR2), making them freely available through the network.
Finally, we explore the hypothesis that the properties of the stellar populations and ionized
gas of galaxies at the effective radius are representative of the overall average ones, finding
that this is indeed the case.
Key Words: galaxies: structure methods: data analysis surveys techniques: spec-
troscopic
1 Instituto de Astronoma, Universidad Nacional Auton oma de 7 Facultad de CC. Fsicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
Mexico, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. Madrid, Spain.

2 Instituto de Astrofsica de Andaluca (CSIC), Granada, Spain. 8 Australian Astronomical Observatory, Epping, Australia.
3 Departamento de Fsica Te orica, Universidad Autonoma de 9 Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias (IAC), Tenerife, Spain.
Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 10 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Chile.

4 Instituto Nacional de Astrofsica, Optica y Electronica, Tonantz- 11 Departamento de Astronoma, Universidad de Chile, Santiago,
intla, Puebla, Mexico. Chile.

5 Universidad Aut 12 Observatorio Astron omico, Cordoba, Argentina.
onoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Astro-UAM,
UAM, Unidad Asociada CSIC. 13 Consejo de Investigaciones Cientficas y T ecnicas de la Republica
6 Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, USA. Argentina, Argentina.
171
172
SANCHEZ ET AL.
1. INTRODUCTION the different analyses performed on the data to generate

the dataproducts. In order to illustrate the process we use
Integral Field Spectroscopy (IFS) is steadily becom-
real data extracted from on-going IFS surveys.
ing a common technique after several years of being lim-
ited to a handful of specialists across the world. In par- The sequence of the article is as follows: In 2 we
ticular, IFS is nowadays widely used to study the spec- describe the datasets that have been used to illustrate how
troscopic properties of galaxies and their evolution along the pipeline works. In 3 we describe the full analysis
cosmological times. This is evident in the observational process, step by step, including (i) the description of the
pattern that has evolved from studies focused on limited pre-processing of the data, required to perform an ho-
samples or individual objects (e.g. Garca-Lorenzo et al. mogeneous analysis for different datasets ( 3.1); (ii) the
2005; Rosales-Ortega et al. 2011) to studies of large sam- analysis of the central spectrum ( 3.2), with a detailed
ples of galaxies in the last decade (e.g. Gonzalez Delgado description of the study of the stellar population ( 3.2.1);
et al. 2015). (iii) the spatial binning scheme adopted in P3D in or-
der to increase the S/N of the stellar continuum, indicat-
After the success of prototyping surveys, like ing the main differences with the most common used one
SAURON (Bacon et al. 2001), a new set of observational ( 3.3); (iv) the analysis of the stellar population in the
programs has flourished, either at low redshift: e.g. At- different spatial-bins and the corresponding analysis of
las3D (Cappellari et al. 2011), Disk Mass Survey (Ber- the emission lines ( 3.4 and 3.4.3); (v) the dezonifi-
shady et al. 2010), CALIFA (Sanchez et al. 2012), and cation procedure and how a emission line pure datacube
the on-going MaNGA (Bundy et al. 2015) and SAMI is generated ( 3.4.4); (vi) the analysis of the stellar in-
(Croom et al. 2012) surveys, or at high redshifts: e.g. dices for the spatially binned spectra ( 3.6.1); (vii) 3.5
SINS (Forster Schreiber et al. 2006). Despite their dif- and 3.6 describe the procedures adopted to analyze the
ferences, like the number of galaxies observed and/or the strong and weak emission lines spaxel-wise for the emis-
number of spaxels sampling each galaxy, the total num- sion line datacube; (viii) 3.7 summarizes the way the
ber of spectra of these surveys is similar, to order of mag- dataproducts are packed in a set of datacubes in order
nitude, to the total number of spectra in the Sloan Digital to be distributed in a simple way. (ix) A practical use
Sky Survey (York et al. 2000), as recently highlighted of P3D is described in 4, including the distribution
by Sanchez (2015). Moreoever, the advent of new in- of all the dataproducts derived for the V500 setup of the
strumentation able to produce even larger datasets for a CALIFA DR2 galaxies (Garca-Benito et al. 2015); Fi-
single galaxy (e.g., MUSE Bacon et al. 2010), and their nally, the summary and conclusions from this article are
likely use in survey mode, will increase by orders of mag- included in 5.
nitude and very fast the number of IFS spectra to be an-
alyzed. For this reason, it is necessary to develop new
tools capable of analyzing spectra of different surveys in 2. DATA
a consistent and automatic way. Along this article we describe the different steps of
In order to address this problem we developed the analysis pipeline illustrating the intermediate results
P3D. This article is the second in a series focused on using the following IFU data of the galaxy NGC 2916: (i)
the description of this pipeline, a spectroscopic analysis the datacubes provided by the CALIFA survey (Sanchez
tool developed to characterize the properties of the stel- et al. 2012), in both the high and low spectral resolution
lar populations and ionized gas emission lines in the spa- modes, and (ii) the datacubes provided by the P-MaNGA
tially resolved data of optical IFU surveys. In the first studies (Bundy et al. 2015). This galaxy was selected
article of this series, (Sanchez et al. 2015b, hereafter Pa- since it was already used by Cid Fernandes et al. (2013)
per I), we described in detail the basic fitting algorithms and Cid Fernandes et al. (2014) to illustrate the use of
behind P3D, included in a package named FIT3D. In their own analysis pipeline, based on .
that article we focused on the description of how the algo- The details of the CALIFA survey, the sample, obser-
rithms work on an individual spectrum, on the definition vational strategy, and reduction are explained in Sanchez
of the different parameters recovered, and on the estima- et al. (2012). All galaxies were observed using PMAS
tion of the accuracy of the numerical values recovered, (Roth et al. 2005) in the PPAK configuration (Kelz et al.
as well as on the limitations of the methodology. In the 2006), covering an hexagonal field of view (FoV) of
present article we focus on the description of how P3D 74 64 , which was sufficient to map the full optical
handles a complete datacube. We describe step-by-step extent of the galaxies up to two to three disk effective
radii. This was possible because of the diameter selec-
14 Departamento de Fsica y Astronoma, Universidad de La Serena, tion of the sample (Walcher et al. 2014). The observ-
La Serena, Chile. ing strategy guaranteed complete coverage of the FoV,
PIPE3D, ANALYSIS SEQUENCE 173
V500 V1200 P-MaNGA
1
1
20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-20
-20
-20
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)
Fig. 1. Broad-band image maps synthesized from the V500 (V-band), V1200 (B-band) and P-MaNGA (V-band) datacubes in logarith-
mic scales of 1016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 . The contours represent the intensity level starting at 1017 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 and with
successive steps of 1017 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 . The color figure can be viewed online.
with a final spatial resolution of FWHM2.5 , corre- (R1600 at 4000, and R2300 at 8500), with a to-
sponding to 1 kpc at the average redshift of the sur- tal system throughput of 25%. More details on the
vey (Garca-Benito et al. 2015). The sampled wave- MaNGA setup are given by Drory et al. (2015).
length range and spectroscopic resolution (3745-7500 , The P-MaNGA, or MaNGA prototype, observations
/ 850, V500 setup) were more than sufficient to ex- were obtained for three galaxy fields in January 2013,
plore the most prominent ionized gas emission lines from as a testing phase of the instrument, spectrograph, ob-
[O ]3727 to [S ]6731 at the redshift of our targets, serving procedures, and data reduction. They comprise
on one hand, and to deblend and subtract the underly- a heterogeneous sample of galaxies, including four ob-
ing stellar population, on the other (e.g., Kehrig et al. jects selected from the CALIFA survey for photomet-
2012; Cid Fernandes et al. 2013, 2014; Sanchez et al. ric and astrometric calibration purposes: IC 0944, NGC
2013, 2014). In addition the objects were observed us- 2916, UGC 05124, UGC 06036 (e.g. Bundy et al. 2015;
ing a higher resolution setup, covering only the blue end Belfiore et al. 2015; Li et al. 2015; Wilkinson et al. 2015).
of the spectral range (3700-4800, / 1650, V1200 Like in the case of the CALIFA survey, a three dithering
setup). The exposure time in this second setup was three scheme was adopted to obtain a complete spatial cover-
times larger than in the previous one to ensure a similar age, filling the gaps between the adjacent fibers. The raw
depth of the corresponding data. The dataset was reduced data were reduced using a prototype of the MaNGA Data
using version 1.5 of the CALIFA pipeline, whose mod- Reduction Pipeline (DRP), which is described in detail
ifications with respect to the ones presented in Sanchez by Law et al. (in preparation). In essence, the data re-
et al. (2012) and Husemann et al. (2013) are described duction includes all the usual steps required to extract the
in detail in Garca-Benito et al. (2015). In summary, the fiber-based spectra from the CCDs, perform the wave-
data fulfilled the predicted quality-control requirements length calibration, correct for the fiber-to-fiber transmis-
with a spectrophotometric accuracy better than a 6% in sion, subtract the sky spectrum, perform the flux cali-
the entire wavelength range. bration and re-arrange spatially the spectra (e.g. Sanchez
The details of the MaNGA survey, its sample, obser- 2006a). The MaNGA and P-MaNGA data have the same
vational strategy, and reduction are explained in Bundy spectral resolution, similar to CALIFA-V1200, and a spa-
et al. (2015) and Law et al. (2015). The MaNGA instru- tial resolution similar to the CALIFA data (2.5 , Bundy
ment was developed under the framework of the SDSS- et al. 2015).
IV project. It deploys 17 science integral field units The final product of the data reduction from both sur-
(IFUs), each one composed of an hexagonal array of veys is a regular grid datacube, with x and y coordinates
fibers, across a field of view of 3 degree diameter attached that indicate the right ascension and declination of the tar-
to the 2.5m Sloan Telescope (Gunn et al. 2006). Individ- get, and the z coordinate a common step in wavelength,
ual science IFUs range in size from 19 fibers (12.5 di- (in the case of CALIFA), or in the logarithm of the wave-
ameter) to 127 fibers (32.5 diameter), with a diameter of length (in the case of P-MaNGA). For simplicity the P-
2 /fiber, and a 56% effective filling factor. The fiber-ends MaNGA cubes were transformed to the same format of
are coupled with the BOSS spectrographs (Smee et al. the CALIFA ones. In both cases the pipelines also pro-
2013), which provides a continuous wavelength coverage vide the propagated error cube and a proper mask cube
from 3600 to 10300 at a spectral resolution R2000 of bad pixels. In the case of CALIFA they also include
174
SANCHEZ ET AL.
a prescription to handle the errors when performing spa- fixed spectral sampling (d ). The second extension cor-
tial binning (due to covariance between adjacent pixels responds to the 1 noise level of each pixel as formally
after image reconstruction). Although we describe here propagated by the pipeline. Those two extensions are
the analysis of this particular dataset, which comprises mandatory for P3D. In addition, if there is a third ex-
galaxies in common between these two surveys, P3D tension it is identified as the bad-pixel mask, where the
is capable of analyzing data from any of the three ma- pixels not usable are indicated with a 1. Any further ex-
jor on-going IFU surveys: MaNGA, CALIFA, and SAMI tensions will be ignored by the code.
(Croom et al. 2012). There are very few galaxies in com- Therefore, in the case of CALIFA data it is not nec-
mon between the three surveys, because although the red- essary to perform any modification of the original cubes.
shift footprints overlap, the sample selection criteria are But in MaNGA and SAMI there are different modifi-
quite different. In a companion article (Sanchez et al., cations that have to be taken into account. In the case
in preparation) we will provide the dataproducts for the of MaNGA the spectral sampling should be transformed
early-data release of the SAMI survey (Allen et al. 2015). from the logarithmic scale to a linear one (at least in
the current format of the MaNGA data). Note that this

transformation does not alter the spectral resolution of
3. ANALYSIS SEQUENCE
the data, nor does it fix it to a particular value. We have
P3D analyzes each individual datacube in a fully just re-sampled the data. In addition the order and mean-
automatic way, without using any additional external in- ing of the extensions should be re-arranged to produce
formation on the object to be analyzed (like redshift, as- the required input file. Finally, in the case of SAMI
trometry, and so on). Here we describe the different indi- the blue and red datacubes correspond to two different
vidual steps taken and the dataproducts provided. and discontinuous spectral ranges (Croom et al. 2012),
and should be glued into a single dataset to cover the
3.1. Cube pre-processing maximum wavelength range observed by the final setup
Prior to any analysis, a preprocessing of the dat- of this survey (3720-7426 ). One should take into ac-
acubes is required in order to (i) standardize the input count that this final wavelength range is different from
format and (ii) determine which areas within the FoV of the largest accessible one by the SAMI instrument, due
the data are suitable for the analysis. to the selected setup for the red spectra (Croom et al.
Most IFU surveys, and in particular CALIFA, 2012). The spectra included in the red datacube pro-
MaNGA, and SAMI, provide a FITS format file includ- vided by the SAMI pipeline are degraded to the instru-
ing a datacube as the final product of the reduction. In mental resolution of the blue datacube before creating a
that cube, created using different interpolation/image- COMBO datacube. That procedure is mandatory if we
reconstruction schemes, the X and Y coordinates corre- want to analyze the blue and red-arm spectra together as
spond to the spatial dimension (i.e., RA and DEC), and a single spectrum per spaxel. Then the cubes are just
the third coordinate corresponds to the wavelength. All combined by using the two datasets and interpolating the
of them include several extensions in the FITS files that spectra to a common linear spectral sampling (adopting
store, not only the physical flux intensity at each loca- the one of the blue datacube). Obviously, the COMBO
tion and wavelength, but also the propagated error asso- datacubes have a blank wavelength range between 5800
ciated with those fluxes, a mask to indicate which pixels and 6300 . Finally, all the cubes are converted to the
within the cube should or should not be taken into ac- same flux units, 1016 erg s1 cm2 1 spaxel1 , to facil-
count, and finally even the weight of the covariance in the itate comparison of the results. The cubes are corrected
error propagation. However, the actual format is different for galactic extinction (when feasible) using the infor-
for each survey (e.g., see Husemann et al. 2013; Garca- mation in the header, the Milky Way extinction law by
Benito et al. 2015, for a few examples). P3D requires Cardelli et al. (1989), and a Milky Way specific dust at-
all the input cubes to be in the same format, which cor- tenuation of RV =3.1.
responds to the configuration adopted for the CALIFA The next step selects the areas of interest within the
datacubes, since it was originally developed for this sur- FoV. Due to the nature of the IFU systems provided by
vey. the three surveys, the useful FoV follows either a fixed
The input file FITS format is described in Husemann hexagonal shape (CALIFA), an hexagonal shape of dif-
et al. (2013), and it comprises a set of data cubes stored ferent size (MaNGA), or a circular shape (SAMI). Fur-
as extensions of the same file. The first extension cor- thermore, in many cases the FoV covers foreground stars
responds to the measured flux densities, corrected for that should be masked, either using a proper catalog of
Galactic extinction in units of 1016 erg s1 cm2 1 , field stars or a mask provided by the user. Finally due to
with the wavelength solution following a linear step of a the gradients in the surface brightness of galaxies across
30
Flux (10-16 Erg s-1 cm-2 -1 )
20
30
P-MaNGA
20
CAL-V500
10
CAL-V1200
10
0
4200 4410
0
4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 104

Wavelength ()
Fig. 2. Central spectrum of NGC2916 for 5 aperture centered on the peak emission of the galaxy extracted from the V500 (in red)
and the V1200 (blue) CALIFA setups, and the P-MaNGA datacubes (orange). The inset shows a zoom area centered on the H and
H spectral regions to highlight the similarities between the datasets. The color figure can be viewed online.
the FoV there are areas with too little S/N to perform shows a comparison between the three broad-band im-
any reliable analysis of the stellar continuum, even in ages, illustrating the similarities in terms of spatial res-
the case of a proper spatial binning. Those areas should olution between the three different datasets. The abso-
be masked for the analysis of the continuum, but not (in lute flux intensities differ within the expectations for the
general) for the analysis of the emission lines, since the CALIFA and P-MaNGA datasets. We must recall here
spatial pattern of both components (and therefore of the that the current estimations of spectrophotometric accu-
S/N distribution) are in general decoupled. In P3D we racies for CALIFA are of the order of 3 4 % (Garca-
mask all the areas with a S/N<3 in the wavelength range Benito et al. 2015), while for P-MaNGA they are of the
5590-5680 . This range was selected to avoid possi- order of 15% (Belfiore et al. 2015). The lower pho-
ble contamination by night sky emission lines, and at tometric accuracy of the P-MaNGA observations arises
the same time avoid moderate contamination by emission because the prototype MaNGA hardware was designed
lines in the galaxy. This masking is needed since at low to explore a variety of alternative flux calibration meth-
S/N the noise is not dominated by the Poissonian errors ods in order to determine the optimal approach for the
of the intensity of the astronomical target, but by other main survey. In contrast, the full MaNGA survey-mode
effects such as the sky brightness and sky subtraction, or data reach spectrophotometric accuracies of 3% (Yan
by the electron noise, which require to perform a binning et al., submitted). The P-MaNGA datasets were origi-
of a huge area to increase the S/N to an acceptable level. nally reduced using a preliminary version of the pipeline,
This is a problem, since at large areas the co-added spec- and therefore there are some inaccuracies associated with
tra lack coherence in their properties, e.g., different kine- the reduction that are expected to be larger than those of
matics, different stellar populations, and different sources the current version of the MaNGA datacubes (Law et al.
of gas ionization may be present. 2015).
An example of the central spectra extracted from each
datacube is shown in Figure 2. For each spectrum we
3.2. Analysis of the central spectrum
applied the stellar population and emission line fitting
Initially the pipeline extracts the central spectrum of procedures described in Paper I ( 2). First, each spec-
each datacube, defined as the 5 diameter (2.5 radius) trum was fitted using a very simple template including
aperture spectrum in the case of CALIFA (P-MaNGA), two SSPs plus a spectrum of an emission line source, for
centred at the peak intensity in a broad-band image of the non-linear analysis, with the main aim of estimating
the corresponding object. The broad-band image in the the systemic velocity of the galaxy, its central velocity
observed frame is synthesized by convolving the filter dispersion and the dust attenuation. In this first analysis
response curve through the datacube. For the CALIFA a wide range of non-linear parameters is explored. A pri-
V500 and the P-MaNGA we use the V band filter, while ori, the explored range of systemic velocities covers the
for the CALIFA V1200 we use the B band. Figure 1 full redshift range of the survey considered. The veloc-
176
SANCHEZ ET AL.
30 Original
SSP model
SSP+EL model
Flux (10-16 Erg s-1 cm-2 -1 )
SSP residual
SSP+EL res.
20
26
24
10
22
20
4830 5040
0
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500

Wavelength ()
Fig. 3. Results of the SSP and emission line fitting procedure using FIT3D for the central spectrum of NGC 2916 extracted from the
V500 datacube of the CALIFA survey, shown in Fig. 2. The black line shows the original spectrum, along with the best fitted stellar
population (light blue), and the best fitted combination of stellar population and emission lines (red). Finally the pure emission line
spectrum, after subtracting the best model for the stellar population, is shown as a solid orange line, and the residual of the subtraction
of the best fitted model including both the stellar population and the emission line model is shown as a light green line. The inset
shows the same spectra for the wavelength range between H and O , to highlight the quality of the fitting. The color figure can be
viewed online.
ity dispersion covers the range between 0 and 400 km/s, 3.2 of that paper). The main reason is that it is based
including most of the known central velocity dispersion on one of the best spectrophotometrically calibrated li-
values for galaxies. Finally, the dust attenuation for the braries of stellar spectra. The template library adopted
stellar population covers a range from AV =0 to 1.6 mag. for the estimation of the non-linear parameters of the cen-
This latter parameter is derived from the range of dust tral spectrum of the galaxies comprises two extreme stel-
attenuation values observed in most galaxies (e.g. Char- lar populations: (i) a young (90 Myr) and low metallic-
lot & Fall 2000; Calzetti 2001). The number of SSPs ity (Z/Z = 0.2) stellar population, and (ii) an old (17.8
in this template is limited for the shake of speed, due to Gyr) and high metallicity one (Z/Z = 1.5). In addition it
the strong dependence of the computational time on the includes an empirical spectrum characteristic of an emis-
number of SSPs in the template and on the range of pa- sion line nebula, corresponding to the integrated spec-
rameters explored. trum across a FoV of 5 6 of the Orion Nebula (Sanchez
If there is a hint of the expected non-linear param- et al. 2007c). The choice of the spectra included in this
eters, such as a published systemic velocity and velocity template was the result of different experiments, guesses
dispersion from previous analyses (e.g., from SDSS spec- and errors along the past five years of analyzing CAL-
troscopy), or the expected dust attenuation, the pipeline IFA data, and nearly two years of analyzing MaNGA and
can restrict the range of parameters explored and speed SAMI data, in order to recover the non-linear parame-
up the process. ters in a way consistent with the values reported for the
central SDSS spectra (e.g. Marmol-Queralto et al. 2011;
After the non-linear parameters are derived, each Sanchez et al. 2012).
spectrum is fitted, in the linear phase, with a limited stel-
lar population library that includes 12 SSPs, as described The template library adopted for the estimation of the
below. This provides a simple but robust estimation of properties of the stellar populations of the central spec-
the properties of the stellar populations and the shape of trum comprises a grid of SSPs including four stellar ages
the underlying continuum (e.g. Sanchez et al. 2013). (0.09, 0.45, 1.00, and 17.78 Gyr), and three metallicities
All SSP templates used so far, were extracted from (0.0004, 0.019, and 0.03), subsolar, solar, and superso-
the MILES project (Sanchez-Blazquez et al. 2006; lar. This template library, miles12 hereafter, was used
Vazdekis et al. 2010; Falcon-Barroso et al. 2011). We se- in many previous CALIFA studies, for instance, Sanchez
lected this template on the basis of the results of Paper I, et al. (2012, 2013, 2014) and Barrera-Ballesteros et al.
were we demonstrate that is is optimal for the analysis (2015). Note that we use a very simple template library
of the stellar population based on simulations ( 3.1 and in this case since the main goal of the analysis of the cen-
tral spectrum is to derive the systemic velocity and the of wavelength ranges including the indicated set of emis-
central velocity dispersion properties. The results of the sion lines, and they are all jointly fitted, assuming that
analysis of the stellar population is not used anymore by they have similar kinematic properties. In addition we fix
the pipeline, and the template is adopted just to speed-up certain line intensity ratios, such as the relative strength
the computing process. of the [O ] and [N ] doublets.
The result of this analysis is illustrated by Figure 3,
3.2.1. Detailed analysis of the stellar population where the best model for the central spectrum of NGC
2916 extracted from V500 datacube of the CALIFA sur-
After a first guess of the systemic velocity and the
vey including the stellar population and the emission
central velocity dispersion has been obtained (on the ba-
lines is shown, along with the residuals from the differ-
sis of the analysis described above), the procedure is re-
ent analysis. In this figure it is possible to appreciate the
peated, restricting the exploration of the kinematic pa-
quality of the fitting of both the stellar populations and
rameters within a range of 300 km/s around the esti-
the emission lines, that has been extensively quantified in
mated systemic velocity, and 50% around the estimated
Paper I, 3 and 4. In particular, it is possible to appre-

velocity dispersion. The dust attenuation is explored in
ciate that we can recover the emission line fluxes even in
the same range of values. For this second iteration we se-
the case of severe absorptions (e.g., in the case of H).
lect a template with 3 SSPs for the non-linear exploration
(i.e., the derivation of the velocity, velocity dispersion,
and dust attenuation, as described in Paper I, 2.1), in-
3.3. Spatial binning
cluding the two extreme populations described above and
an intermediate population with an age of 1 Gyr and The central spectra described in the previous section
metallicity Z/Z = 0.4. For the linear exploration (i.e., have, in general, a S/N well above 50 for most of the
the detailed analysis of the stellar population by a multi- galaxies included in the IFU surveys of our interest (e.g.
SSP decomposition), a more complex stellar library was Sanchez et al. 2012; Bundy et al. 2015). Therefore, they
considered, defined as gsd156 in Paper I ( 3.1 of that are above the S/N threshold for which the simulations
paper). This library is described in detail in Cid Fernan- from Paper I ( 3 and Table 1) suggest that the prop-
des et al. (2013). It comprises 156 templates that cover erties of the stellar populations are well recovered (i.e.,
39 stellar ages (1 Myr to 13 Gyr), and 4 metallicities within an error of 0.1 dex). However, as the surface-
(Z/Z = 0.2, 0.4, 1, and 1.5). These templates were ex- brightness of the galaxies declines as a function of the
tracted from a combination of the synthetic stellar spec- galactocentric distance, the S/N decreases rapidly in the
tra from the GRANADA (Martins et al. 2005) and the outer regions (e.g., Figure 13, Sanchez et al. 2012), and
SSP libraries provided by the MILES project. This SSP therefore the results from any analysis of the stellar con-
template has been extensively used by the CALIFA col- tinuum become unreliable, as already noticed by several
laboration in different studies (e.g. Perez et al. 2013; Cid authors (e.g. Cappellari & Copin 2003; Cid Fernandes
Fernandes et al. 2013; Gonzalez Delgado et al. 2014). et al. 2013, 2014).
The only difference with respect to these studies is that In order to overcome this problem a binning scheme
the spectral resolution of the library was not fixed to is frequently adopted to aggregate spaxels in the outer re-
the spectral resolution of the CALIFA V500 setup data gions so as to increase the signal to noise ratio. This is a
(FWHM6 ), to allow its use for datasets with differ- mathematical problem that goes beyond the field of inte-
ent resolution (like the ones provided by MaNGA and gral field spectroscopy, although it is broadly addressed
the CALIFA V1200 setup). This SSP-library uses the in this field. A set of solutions has been proposed on the
Salpeter (1955) initial mass function (IMF). Although the basis of different assumptions and goals, in addition to
current implementation of the pipeline uses this SSP li- the main one, i.e., to increase the S/N ratio preserving as
brary, P3D is not restricted to this particular one; it can much as possible the spectroscopic properties of the data.
be exchanged by modifying a configuration parameter in One of the simplest methods was proposed by Samet
the main script. (1984), the so called Quadtree algorithm. This method
As described in Paper I, 2, FIT3D allows to fit consists of a recursive partition of the FoV into axis-
the stellar continuum and the emission lines by means aligned squares. The initial square corresponds to the en-
of an iterative procedure. In the case of P3D we fit tire FoV. Then the FoV is divided in four areas of equal
the strongest emission lines in the optical wavelength size. Subsequently each of the sub-squares is equally di-
range, jointly fitting the following emission lines: (i) vided. If a certain goal S/N, required as input to the al-
[O ]3727; (ii) H; (iii) H; (iv) H, [O ]4959, gorithm, is not achieved in the next iteration, then the
and [O ]5007; (v) [N ]6548, H, [N ]6583, procedure stops for a particular square. However, if it is
[S ]6717, and [S ]6731. In this way, we define a set achieved, the procedure continues until the original pixel
178
SANCHEZ ET AL.
VOR Index
V500 V500 V500
CS Index
400
400
[5590-5680] map (10-16 c.g.s.)
1.5
20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
1
0
0
200
200
0.5
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
VOR S/N
V500
150
V500
CS S/N
20
20
100
100
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
100
S/N
0
50
50
50
-20
-20
0
0
20 0 -20 20 0 -20
10 20 30
Radial distance (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)
Fig. 4. Top-left panel: Narrow-band intensity map derived by summing the fluxes within the wavelength range 55905680 for
the CALIFA V500-datacube of NGC 2916. Top-central panel: Segmentation map derived for the same datacube using a continuum
plus S/N binning scheme, as outlined in the text. Top-right panel: Segmentation map derived for the same datacube using the most
frequently used S/N voronoi binning scheme. Bottom-left panel: Radial distribution of the signal-to-noise for the original datacube
(blue squares), the segmented cube based on Voronoi binning (orange stars), and the continuum plus S/N segmented cube (black
circles), for the same datacube. Bottom-central panel: S/N map for each of the spatial bins created using a continuum plus S/N
binning scheme (the one on the top-central panel), for the same datacube. Bottom-right panel: S/N map for each of the spatial-bins
created using a S/N voronoi binning scheme (the one on the top-right panel), for the same datacube. In all the maps the contours are
the same as the ones presented in Figure 1, left-panel. The color figure can be viewed online.
(spaxel) size is reached. This algorithm is extensively and range of surface brightness of the original isophotes,
explored in Cappellari & Copin (2003). The two main and the original pixel (spaxel) selected to start the aggre-
problems of this procedure are that (1) it depends on the gation in each isophote, irrespectively of the goal S/N.
actual orientation of the FoV with respect to the original
geometry of the galaxies, (2) for the dataset discussed The most broadly used binning scheme for IFS data
here, with an intrinsic non-square (or rectangular shape), is the Voronoi binning procedure (Cappellari & Copin
the method should be adapted, and (3) it does not pre- 2003). This algorithm was developed to satisfy three re-
serve the shape of the original astronomical object. quirements, in addition to the main goal of the algorithms
An alternative method is the isophotal segmentation, described above: (i) the bins should properly tessellate
first introduced by Papaderos et al. (2002), and imple- the FoV (i.e., there should be no holes or overlapping ar-
mented for IFU data in Papaderos et al. (2013), and eas), (ii) the bin shape has to be as compact or round as
Gomes et al. (submitted). The algorithm segments the possible, and (iii) the scatter of the S/N after the binning
FoV on the basis of a set of isophotes, according to the should be as small as possible. Under this basic assump-
surface brightness distribution. Then each isophotal area tion the authors developed an algorithm in which, starting
is divided in subsequent bins by aggregating adjacent from a set of points within the FoV (called generators),
pixels (spaxels) along the azimuthal angle in order to a tessellation based on the Voronoi algorithm is gener-
achieve a goal S/N. Therefore, the area of the final spatial ated. This guarantees that all pixels (spaxels) in a certain
bins grows with galactocentric distance (as the surface spatial bin are the nearest ones to the point that has gen-
brightness decreases). The main problem with this ap- erated the considered bin. The generators are selected
proach is that the resulting segmentation/binning depends on the basis of a ranking order S/N of the pixels and a
strongly on some arbitrary parameters, like the number distance criterion (Cappellari & Copin 2003).
By construction, this algorithm guarantees a very ho- The published version of the Voronoi binning does
mogeneous distribution of the S/N; this has made it very not take into account the covariance between adjacent
popular among the community. However, it does not spaxels that is inherent to the image reconstruction
preserve the original shape of the astronomical object, schemes required to obtain a datacube from a dithering
in particular for galaxies with sharp structures. Further- observation using a fiber bundle. It is known that by co-
more, since the aggregation is based mostly on a S/N cri- adding N adjacent spectra the noise does decrease fol-
teria, it may include spaxels corresponding to areas of lowing a (N) law. On the contrary, the decrease in the
the galaxy with very different physical properties (like error is shallower, due to the covariance between adja-
spiral arms and inter-arm regions). This issue was never cent spaxels. This was nicely described in Husemann
a concern when the algorithm was created, since it was et al. (2013), where a functional form was proposed for
developed under the umbrella of the SAURON project the correction of the noise propagation when taking into
(Bacon et al. 2001), whose main (initial) goal was to ex- account the covariance. The Voronoi binning algorithm
plore the central regions of a sample of early type galax- could be corrected for this effect in a simple way.
ies, and mostly focused on the study of their kinematical In P3D we depart from the widely used Voronoi
properties. The light distribution of an early type galaxy binning scheme and we propose a different algorithm,
is expected to follow a smooth shape, and the kinemat- based on both a continuity criterion for the surface bright-
ics shows no abrupt changes. Therefore, imposing fur- ness and a goal for the signal-to-noise ratio (Contin-
ther criteria to force the spatial bins to follow the shape uum plus S/N binning, CS-binning hereafter). Like the
of the light (like the isophotal method), was not needed. Voronoi binning, CS-binning requires as input a signal-
For similar reasons it was broadly adopted in the analysis map, a noise-map, and a S/N goal. In addition, in order to
of the Atlas3D data (Cappellari et al. 2010), and subse- be aggregated it requires the difference of fraction of flux
quently used in hundreds of studies. between a given spaxel and an adjacent one. In princi-
ple, the algorithm looks initially for all the spaxels/pixel
An additional issue regarding the Voronoi binning al- for which the S/N is already above the minimum S/N re-
gorithm is that it assumes that the S/N follows the light quired. Those are selected as spatial bins with a single
distribution. In general, this is the case for datasets ac- pixel. Then, for the remaining pixels the algorithm looks
quired with IFUs that cover the complete FoV, like the for the one with the higher intensity. This will be the seed
lens array systems of SAURON (Bacon et al. 2001). In of the next spatial bin. It derives the S/N at this location
those cases, when the noise budget is dominated by the and estimates the maximum number of adjacent pixels
intrinsic Poissonian noise due to light coming from the required to increase that S/N to the target S/N, assuming
astronomical target, the S/N is a function of the surface that adjacent pixels have similar S/N levels. It assumes
brightness. For the SAURON and Altas3D data this was Poissonian statistics plus the effect of the covariance, and
the case for most of the targets, since the FoV of the in- solves for N (the number of adjacent pixels to co-add)
strument rarely covered more than 1.5 effective radius. from the equation:
Thus the noise produced by the sky subtraction and other
electronic effects of the detectors were negligible.
S /Ngoal = S /Ninput N covar(N), (1)
However, most of the current IFU surveys adopt a dif-
ferent IFU technology (fiber bundle with an incomplete where S /Ninput is the estimated signal-to-noise if the
coverage of the FoV), and the targets are sampled up to noise distribution were Poissonian (i.e., no covariance
2.5 effective radii and beyond (e.g. Walcher et al. 2014). between adjacent spaxels), N is the number of adjacent
As a consequence, these basic assumptions do not hold. spaxels included in a particular spatial bin, and covar(N)
First, because they use fiber bundles current IFU surveys is the correction introduced by the correlation of the noise
adopt a dithering scheme in order to cover the complete between adjacent spaxels. This last parameter is derived
FoV. In most cases this approach creates an intrinsic in- statistically in an empirical way as described in Huse-
homogeneous distribution of the S/N, even for exposures mann et al. (2013) and more recently in Garca-Benito
of totally flat targets. In the case of the three pointing et al. (2015), by creating spatial bins of arbitary size,
dithering pattern the spaxels can be covered by one, two, coadding N adjacent spaxels, computing S /Ninput and
or
even three fibers. Therefore, there could be a factor measuring the real S /N from the coadded spectra. Then
3 in the S/N ratio of adjacent spaxels of the same inten- a functional form for the dependence of covar(N) with
sity. The Voronoi binning, which takes into account only the number of coadded spaxels is derived as shown in
the S/N as the basic metric, will aggregate spaxels from Figure 11 of Garca-Benito et al. (2015).
different physical regions to compensate for that inhomo- Then, N is used to estimate the radius of the circular
geneity. aperture required to be integrated to enclose this number
180
SANCHEZ ET AL.
V500 V1200 P-MaNGA
200
200
200
stellar velocity (km/s)

20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
0
0
0
0
-20
-20
-20
-200
-200
-200
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
V500 V1200 P-MaNGA
Stellar (km/s)
stellar (km/s)
stellar (km/s)
200
200
200
20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
150
150
150
0
0
100
100
100
-20
-20
-20
50
50
50
0
0
0
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
Fig. 5. Stellar velocity (top panels) and velocity dispersion maps (bottom panels) derived using the three datasets for NGC2916:
left CALIFA V500 setup; central CALIFA V1200 setup; right: P-MaNGA dataset. For the velocity dispersion the values below the
instrumental velocity dispersion have been masked. The color figure can be viewed online.
of spaxels/pixels: the data. It shows the distribution of spatial bins when a

p S/N goal of 40 is selected for the Voronoi binning, and
Rmax = N/ (2) a S/N goal of 50 and a fractional flux variation of 20%
between adjacent pixels are accepted for the CS-binning.
Finally, the algorithm aggregates all adjacent pixels To allow a fair comparison, the values were selected to
within a maximum distance of Rmax and for which the reach a S/N>30 in most of the FoV and to have a sim-
flux intensity is within the predefined fraction to the ini- ilar number of spatial bins when using both algorithms
tial seed. In general this creates spatial bins that are not (391 in the case of the Voronoi and 439 in the case of the
round, since they tend to follow the shape of the isophotes CS-binning).
across the FoV. Due to the second criterion, in general
the S /Ngoal is not reached for most of the spatial bins. As expected, both algorithms create similar single
This segmentation/binning scheme is a mix between the pixel spatial bins for those pixels already fulfilling the
isophotal and the Voronoi binning schemes. S/N criterium. For pixels below the S/N goal the less
Figure 4 shows a comparison between the adopted restrictive Voronoi binning creates larger spatial bins, in
CS-binning and the Vorononi binning schemes for the particular in the outer regions of the galaxy. We include
V500 setup data extracted from the CALIFA dataset for in the figure the spatial distribution of S/N for both al-
NGC 2916. The signal and noise maps adopted for both gorithms after applying the spatial binning. By construc-
procedures were created by deriving the median and stan- tion, the distribution is very homogeneous in the case of
dard deviation of the flux intensity in each spaxel for the the Voronoi binning (hS /Ni = 38.5 4.7), and presents
spectral pixels within the wavelength range 5590-5680 a clear structure with a larger dispersion in the case of
. In the case of the Voronoi binning it is used only the the CS-binning (hS /Ni = 30.7 16.3). The bottom-left
S /N map. For the CS-binning the signal map is used for panel of Figure 4 shows the radial distribution of S/N for
the continuity criterion. For both procedures the results the original dataset and for the two binning schemes. Up
depend greatly on the wavelength regime adopted to per- to 10 the three distributions are very similar (the re-
form the spatial binning. The Voronoi binning was mod- gions where no binning is needed). At larger galacto-
ified to take into account the spatial co-variance between centric distances the distribution for the Voronoi binning
becomes almost flat, as expected from the results pre- V500

sented by Cappellari & Copin (2003). In contrast, the V1200
200
CS-binning provides a S/N 40, between 10 and 30 , P-MaNGA
covering a wide range of S/N values (between 30 and
60). The average S/N in this regime is very similar (but
velocity (km/s)
with twice the scatter) to the one provided by the Voronoi
0
binning.
Beyond this distance, the CS-binning gives little im-
provement in S/N with respect to the original data. How-
-200
ever, at those galactocentric distances the original data
have S/N<3 in most cases, and we regard those areas use-
less for the analysis of the underlying stellar population. 10 20 30
If we try to reach a S/N above 30 by co-adding indi-
Radial distance (arcsec)
vidual spaxels with a S/N below 3 the area required to

be covered by the spatial bin would be so large that the V500
spectra would lose the coherence in their basic proper-
150
V1200
ties, as indicated above. Therefore, although it may be
P-MaNGA
mathematically correct the interpretation of the physical
properties derived will be always a problem.
100
(km/s)
This example does not demonstrate the superiority of
any of these methods, as this was never our intention. If
the goal is to normalize the S/N across the FoV of the 50
data, definitely, Voronoi binning is (so far) the best al-
gorithm. However, for increasnig the S/N preserving the
shape of the original target, the CS-binning presents sig-
nificant advantages. For the current implementation of 10 20 30
P3D we adopted a S/N goal of 50 and a more restric-
Radial distance (arcsec)
tive upper limit to the range of relative fluxes between
adjacent spaxels to be coadded, setting it to a value of
Fig. 6. Stellar velocity along a pseudo-slit located at the cen-
10%, prioritizing to keep as much as possible the origi-
ter of the galaxy and tilted 60 (top panel), and radial distribu-
nal shape of the data rather than the final S/N of the spec- tion of the velocity dispersion (bottom panel) extracted from the
tra. By increasing the fractional flux variation one can kinematic maps of the galaxy NGC2916 shown in Figure 5 for
achieve a S/N closer to the goal, with the correspond- the three datasets: CALIFA V500 setup (blue squares), CAL-
ing loss of spatial information. If no limit is imposed to IFA V1200 setup (orange circles), and P-MaNGA (black stars).
the fractional flux variation, the binning provided by both The color figure can be viewed online.
methods is very similar.
The procedure provides a S/N map before and after
binning, and a segmentation map in which each pixel cor- and a position table for each binned cube, following the
responding to the same spatial bin is labeled with the run- order of the spatial bin indices (from the brightest to the
ning index that identifies the spatial bin. All those maps faintest areas in the cube, by construction). In addition
are stored as FITS format files. an intensity map at the wavelength range corresponding
to the V-band before and after performing the binning is
provided. The ratio between both maps is the relative
3.4. Analysis of the stellar population contribution of each pixel to the average intensity within
As described above, the original cube is spatially the spatial bin where it is aggregated. This ratio will be
binned using the CS-binning algorithm. The spectra cor- used later in the dezonification process, which will be ex-
responding to the spaxels within each spatial bin are av- plained below (Cid Fernandes et al. 2013).
eraged and stored as a single spectrum, together with the Each spectrum within the RSS file is analyzed fol-
average spatial coordinates. Thus, for each bin we ob- lowing the same procedures applied to the central spec-
tain a spectrum that corresponds to the mean of each in- trum, as described in 3.2.1. The goals of this analysis
dividual spectrum of all the spaxels within that spatial are the following: (i) to obtain the best representation
bin, masking spectral pixels with bad values. At the end of the underlying stellar population to subtract it from
of this process, a row stacked spectrum (RSS) is created the original data and provide a spectrum of the emission
182
SANCHEZ ET AL.
log(age/yr) [Z/H] log(*/Msun/arcsec2) log(M/L)

8 8.5 9 9.5 10 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 6 7 8 9 4 4.5
V500 V500 V500 V500

20
DEC (arcsec)
0
-20
V1200 V1200 V1200 V1200

20
DEC (arcsec)
0
-20
P-MaNGA P-MaNGA MaNGA P-MaNGA

20
DEC (arcsec)
0
-20
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)
Fig. 7. From left to right, distribution of the luminosity weighted age and metallicity, mass surface density, and mass-to-light ratio of
the stellar population in NGC 2916 across the FoV for the three datasets. Top panels: CALIFA V500 setup. Central panels: CALIFA
V1200 setup. Bottom-right: P-MaNGA dataset. Contours correspond to the same intensity level of the broad band images presented
in Figure 1. The white masked region north-east of the center of the galaxy corresponds to a foreground star, visible in Figure 1. The
color figure can be viewed online.
lines (pure emission line spectrum); (ii) to characterize less than a certain percent). In this particular implemen-
the main properties of the underlying stellar population, tation we iterated just 2 times, to speed up the process
as described in Paper I, 2.3. and because of the limited improvement in terms of the
2 between sucessive iterations.
Following the procedures discussed, the stellar con-
The main differences with respect to the procedure
tinuum is first fitted with a simple template of SSPs in
described in 3.2.1 and Paper I, 2, are:
order to derive the systemic velocity, velocity dispersion,
and dust attenuation (miles12). Then the main prop- The velocity dispersion () for the first spectrum,
erties of the strong emission lines are derived by fitting that corresponds to the peak intensity of the galaxy,
the residual spectrum (after the underlying stellar popula- and therefore to the central region, is explored
tion is subtracted) with a set of Gaussian functions. This within a wide range of values up to 400 km/s (in
first model of the emission lines is subtracted from the addition to the instrumental dispersion that is first
original spectrum to remove the effects of the strongest applied to convolve the SSP template). Then, for
emission lines. Finally, this spectrum is fitted with the successive spectra, corresponding to spatial bins of
gsd156 template library, defined in 3.2.1, to derive the lower flux intensity, the exploration of the velocity
main properties of the stellar populations (age, metallic- dispersion is restricted to a range between 0.5 and
ity, star-formation history, etc). As described in Paper I, 1.5 times the value of the previous iteration, i.e.,
2.2, the procedure may be iterated until it fulfills a cer- 0.5i < i+1 <1.5i , where i is the index of the
tain convergence criterion (i.e., until the 2 decreases to spatial bin.
This procedure ensures that the velocity dispersion The analysis of the stellar populations performed us-
is kept within reasonable values for areas of lower ing FIT3D on the RSS file provides three different data-
S/N (lower intensity, i.e., in the outer part of the products, two csv files, and a FITS format cube:
galaxies). It is known that at lower S/N all fitting
procedures tend to increase the velocity dispersion 1. The first of the two csv files, named
to fit the average distribution of values that is domi- auto ssp.CS.OBJECT.rss.out, is an ascii
nated by the noise. table. Each row comprises the main properties of
the stellar population derived by the fitting proce-
In the case of MaNGA data, the procedure is re- dure for each individual spectrum within the RSS
peated twice, using a different template in the first file (and therefore each spatial bin within the binned
step, due to the wider wavelength range covered by cube). The parameters distributed in each column
MaNGA. First, we adopted a template adopted include the reduced 2 of the fit, the luminosity-
extracted from the MIUSCAT SSP library (Vazdekis and mass-weighted log-ages and log-metallicities
of the stellar populations, as defined in Paper I,
et al. 2012). This library is an extension of MILES,

covering the wavelength range 3465-9469 , with 2.3. In addition it contains the dust attenuation,
a similar spectral resolution and spectrophotomet- the systemic velocity, and the velocity dispersion,
ric quality. We adopted a grid of MIUSCAT SSPs with their corresponding errors. It also includes
including four stellar ages (0.06, 0.20, 2.00, and the average intensity and standard deviation of the
17.78 Gyr), and three metallicities (0.0004, 0.02, residuals from the fitting procedure, and the average
and 0.0331), subsolar, solar, or supersolar. For this mass-to-light ratio within the spatial bin.
particular library we include ages slightly younger 2. The second csv file, named
than the ones included in miles12, since we have coeffs auto ssp.CS.OBJECT.rss.out, is a
seen that they tend to reproduce slightly better the table with one row for each SSP in the library and
blue end of the MaNGA spectra (not covered by for each spectrum in the RSS file (i.e., number of
CALIFA and SAMI). The results of this first anal- spatial bins). The columns include a running index
ysis are used only to characterize the underlying corresponding to the SSP, age, metallicity, and
stellar population in the wider possible wavelength mass-to-light ratio of this population, along with
range, and to provide the best emission line spec- the fraction of light that it contributes to the original
trum (i.e., the orange spectrum in Figure 3). This spectrum at the normalization wavelength, with its
would provide a GAS-pure cube over almost the estimated error. This information is used to derive
complete wavelength range covered by MaNGA. the luminosity- and mass-weighted parameters
The results are also used to derive the non-linear included in the first file.
parameters of the stellar populations (velocity, ve-
locity dispersion and dust attenuation) 3. Finally a FITS format cube, named
output.auto ssp.CS.OBJECT.rss.out.fits
In the second step the same parameters are .gz stores the original spectra, the best model
used, wavelength ranges, stellar templates, and ini- spectra, pure emission line spectra, the residuals
tial guess values for the three surveys (CALIFA, from the fit of the emission lines (as indicated
MaNGA, and SAMI), in order to homogenize the below), and the spectra after subtracting the best
results as much as possible. However, to speed-up model for the emission lines. In this FITS format
the processes, in the case of MaNGA we do not re- cube each slice along the Z-axis comprises the
peat the derivation of the non-linear parameters of results from the fitting procedure for each spectrum
the stellar populations, but use the result from the in the RSS file.
first step described before.
The derived dataproducts included in the two csv
For MUSE data (e.g. Sanchez et al. 2015a) the same files are rearranged into a set of maps (one for each
stellar templates and guess parameters were adopted dataproduct), following the original spatial shape of
as for MaNGA, but restricting the wavelength range the datacubes, by associating each value to the lo-
to that of MUSE. Since for low-z objects MUSE cation in the 2D space defined by the segmentation
does not cover the 4000 break, we are still not sure file, as described in 3.3. This format is conve-
about the accuracy of the parameters derived for the nient to store and share the data, to compare dif-
stellar populations, which should be compared with ferent dataproducts, and for plotting purposes. The
ad hoc simulations, similar to the ones shown in Pa- maps of these dataproducts are stored in separate FITS
per I, 3.2. format files, named map.CS.OBJ PARAM ssp.fits.gz,
184
SANCHEZ ET AL.
10
0
9
log(age/yr)
[Z/H]
V500
V1200
V500
8
-0.5
P-MaNGA
V1200
P-MaNGA
10 20 30 10 20 30
Radial distance (arcsec) Radial distance (arcsec)

9
4.5
8
log(M/L)
4
7
V500
V1200 V500
P-MaNGA V1200
6
3.5
P-MaNGA
10 20 30 10 20 30
Radial distance (arcsec) Radial distance (arcsec)
Fig. 8. Radial distribution of the luminosity-weighted age (top-left panel), metallicity (top-right panel), mass surface density (bottom-
left panel), and mass-to-light ratio (bottom-right panel) of NGC 2916 also shown in Figure 7 for the three datasets: CALIFA V500
setup (blue squares), CALIFA V1200 setup (orange circles), and P-MaNGA (black stars). The color figure can be viewed online.
where OBJ is the object name (as it appears in the dispersion, the three datasets agree just within the cen-
name of the datacube) and PARAM is a label indicat- tral 8 , as expected from the simulations presented in
ing each of the derived dataproducts. For example, the Paper I (e.g., Table 1 of that paper). The V500 and
FITS file map.CS.NGC2916 age ssp.fits.gz stores V1200 datasets of the CALIFA survey agree up to to
the luminosity-weighted age derived for the CALIFA distances 10 . Beyond that galactocentric distance, the
V500 datacube of NGC 2916. All the files generated by velocity dispersion derived for the V1200 data collapses
P3D for the V500 datacube of NGC 2916 described to the minimum selected value of 20 km/s, fixed in the
in this section can be found in the FTP15 . In 3.7 we presented version of P3D at the limit of what is fea-
provide the correspondence of each FITS file with the sible at the resolution of the data. This indicates that
measured parameter, for the distributed dataproducts. we should re-analyze all the datasets allowing the ex-
ploration of lower velocity dispersion values. For the
3.4.1. Stellar Kinematics V500 dataset we have applied an overall quadratic offset
of 120 km/s to match the velocity dispersion; this indi-
Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the results of the kinemat- cates that the offset between the SSP resolution and the
ics analysis for the stellar populations. The figures show instrumental resolution should be revised and that in the
that the estimated velocities agree within 30 km/s across current analysis we have a miss-match of 30% in the
the entire FoV of the three datasets. For the velocity assumed instrumental resolution for the V500 data. This
15 ftp://ftp.caha.es/CALIFA/dataproducts/DR2/Pipe3D_ offset does not affect the derivation of the properties of
NGC2916
the stellar populations, since the final velocity profiles sensitive to the variation of metallicities, like the Fe and
are well constrained, being affected only the derivation Mg absorption features between 5100-5400, this re-
of the velocity dispersions. The offset was derived from sult is somehow expected. This range does not cover
the comparison of the peak velocity dispersion at the cen- the stronger spectral features sensitive to the analyzed
ter of the galaxies, obtained by the pipeline for the 500 parameters, and the wavelength range is too short to be
objects in common between the two CALIFA setups. Af- sensitive to the dust attenuation.
ter this correction the velocity dispersion for the V500 For the regions covered by the three datasets the sur-
dataset presented a cut at 10 , a location at which the face mass density shows very good agreement, within the
values derived were dominated by the instrumental reso- range of the dispersion of each individual dataset. The
lution. For the P-MaNGA dataset the velocity dispersion agreement is better between the two CALIFA datasets
measured beyond 9 presented a large dispersion, with than between them and the P-MaNGA data, with an offset
an offset with respect to the values derived using both the of -0.01 dex and a dispersion of 0.12 dex, in the first case,
V1200 and V500 CALIFA datasets. We still do not know compared with an offset of 0.1 dex and a dispersion of
the origin of this discrepancy , although most probably it 0.1 dex, in the second case. In both cases the dispersion
comes from the fact that the P-MaNGA data were taking is consistent with the limit in the accuracy of the mass
during an experimental phase of this project, using dif- estimation found by different authors using this method-
ferent fibers and packing, which may alter the nominal ology (Gonzalez Delgado et al. 2014, e.g). The offset
spectral resolution. is most probably due to the different spectrophotometric
calibration adopted in each survey (Garca-Benito et al.
3.4.2. Composition of the stellar population 2015; Yan et al. 2016), explaining why the two CALIFA
datasets present a better agreement.
Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the results from the anal-
Finally, the mass-to-light ratio presents a similar dis-
ysis of the properties of the stellar populations. Both
tribution for the three datasets at different galactocen-
figures show the 2D and radial distributions of the
tric distances, although there seems to be a systematic
luminosity-weighted log-age and log-metallicity, the sur-
offset between the three estimations. Like in the
face mass density, and the mass-to-light ratio for the three
case of the stellar mass density, the offset is larger for
different datasets. The log-ages agree within a range
the CALIFA datasets compared to the P-MaNGA ones
of 0.2 dex, for the central regions (<15 ) of the three
(0.07-0.100.04-0.06 dex), than among the former two
datasets, as expected from the simulations presented in
(0.030.05 dex).
Paper I (e.g., Table 1 of that paper). At larger radii, we
All these Figures confirm the consistency of the
are not able to compare with the P-MaNGA results (due
results for the stellar population analysis obtained by
to the smaller FoV of this dataset). However, the analysis
PIPE3D based on different datasets with differences
performed over the V1200 data seems to result in slightly
within the expected range, based on simulations (Paper I,
higher log-ages (0.2 dex) than the ones derived from the
Table 1), and they are also consistent with previous re-
V500 one. On average, an inaccuracy/offset of 0.1 dex
sults (e.g. Cid Fernandes et al. 2013; Gonzalez Delgado
is found between the derived log-ages using the CALIFA
et al. 2014).
V500 and both the V1200 and P-MaNGA dataset, with
a dispersion of 0.1 dex. Between the V1200 and the
P-MaNGA data there is very good agreement, with an 3.4.3. Emission lines in the binned data
offset of 0.03 dex and a dispersion of = 0.06 dex. As explained in Paper I ( 2.4) and briefly described
For the stellar metallicity we found agreement within in 3.4, FIT3D fits the emission lines in a quasi-
a range of 0.1 dex for the three datasets in the shared simultaneous way with the stellar populations, adopting
FoV, although in the inner regions the values derived for an iterative scheme. According to this, the residuals from
the V1200 are slighly smaller. This is consistent with the analysis of the stellar population are fitted with a set
the larger values derived for the ages and the well-known of Gaussian functions to characterize the properties of the
age-metallicity degeneracy. For larger radii the deriva- emission lines, and the best model of the emission lines is
tion based on V1200 data seem to present a slightly larger subtracted from the original spectra to perform the anal-
log-metallicity (0.1 dex). Indeed, the agreement be- ysis of the stellar population in a second iteration.
tween the results derived using the CALIFA V500 dataset This iterative scheme was adopted for the analysis of
and the P-MaNGA ones is remarkably good, with an off- the RSS file provided by the CS-binning. In the current
set of -0.02 dex and a dispersion of 0.06 dex. Taking implementation of P3D we included in the analysis
into account the limited wavelength range of the CAL- loop the fitting to a set of strong emission lines frequently
IFA V1200 data compared to the other two datasets (e.g., observed in the optical range of galaxies: [O ]3727,
Figure 2), a range that does not cover those features more H, H, H, [O ]4959, [O ]5007, [N ]6548,
186
SANCHEZ ET AL.
V500 P-MaNGA V500 P-MaNGA
H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2)
H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2)

8
8
20
20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
6
0
0
0
0
4
-20
-20
-20
-20
2
0
0
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
V500 P-MaNGA V500 P-MaNGA
H velocity (km/s)
H velocity (km/s)
200
200
20
20
20
20
DEC (arcsec)
DEC (arcsec)
0
0
0
0
0
-20
-20
-20
-20
-200
-200
20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20
RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)
Fig. 9. H intensity and velocity maps (top and bottom panels Fig. 10. H intensity and velocity maps (top and bottom pan-
respectively) derived using the CS-binned RSS files obtained els respectively) derived using the emission line pure cubes ob-
from the CALIFA V500 (left panels) and the MaNGA (right tained from the CALIFA V500 (left panels) and the P-MaNGA
panel) datasets of NGC 2916. In the left-hand panels contours (right panel) datasets of NGC 2916. In the left-hand panels con-
correspond to the same intensity level of the broad band im- tours correspond to the same intensity level of the broad band
ages presented in Figure 1. In the right-hand panels contours images presented in Figure 1. In the bottom panels the contours
correspond to the H intensity maps shown in the left-panels, correspond to the H intensity maps shown in the left-panels,
starting at 0.05 1016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec2 with a constant step starting at 0.05 1016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec2 with a constant step
of 1 1016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec2 . The color figure can be of 11016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec2 . The parameteres presented in
viewed online. this figure were obtained after dezonification. The color figure
can be viewed online.
[N ]6583, H, [S ]6717, and [S ]6731. Each of

these emission lines was fitted with a single Gaussian file extracted from the CALIFA V500 datacube of NGC
profile for the pure emission line spectrum at each spatial 2916. As indicated above, all the files generated by
bin derived from the analysis of the stellar population. P3D for the V500 datacube of NGC 2916 can be
The final product of this fitting procedure is an found in the FTP indicated above.
table named elines auto ssp.CS.OBJ.rss.out that Figure 9 illustrates the result of this analysis, showing
comprises, for each spectrum in the CS-file and for each the H flux intensity and velocity maps for the CS-binned
emission line, a set of columns including: (1) the nom- data, after being rearranged into the original spatial shape
inal wavelength of the emission line, (2) its integrated of the datacubes. In both panels it is possible to clearly
flux, (3) the (dispersion in ) of the Gaussian fitted, identify the original CS segmentation. This segmentation
and (4) the systemic velocity with the corresponding was created on the basis of the flux intensity and S/N of
uncertainties estimated by FIT3D. As in the case of the continuum, and in general, does not reproduce the
the stellar population, all dataproducts are rearranged corresponding parameters for the emission lines. It does
into a set of maps, following the original spatial shape not only degrade unnecessarily the spatial resolution of
of the datacubes, by associating the given value to the the emission line maps, but also it can blur the signature
location in the 2D space, defined by the segmentation of weak emission lines by co-adding in the same spatial
file described in 3.3. In a way similar to the analysis of bin emission lines with different kinematics, and it may
the stellar populations, the parameters derived for each also significantly affect the estimated equivalent width.
emission line are stored in separate FITS format files, This effect can be clearly observed in the velocity maps
named map.CS.OBJ PARAM WAVELENGTH.fits.gz, of the areas displaying weak emission.
where OBJ is the object name (as it appears in the name
3.4.4. Dezonification
of the datacube), PARAM is a label that identifies each
of the dataproducts, and WAVELENGTH is the nominal The dezonification procedure was first presented
wavelength of the emission line. For example, the FITS by Cid Fernandes et al. (2013) in order to provide an ac-
file map.CS.NGC2916 flux 6562.fits.gz stores the curate estimation of the spatial distribution of the stellar
flux density of H derived from the CS-binned RSS properties. In P3D we use it to decouple the analysis
of the emission lines from the spatial binning required Finally, this cube is subtracted from the original
to perform an accurate analysis of the stellar continuum. one providing a set of spectra that include only the
This procedure takes into account the relative contribu- emission lines from the ionized gas and the resid-
tion of each spaxel to the spatial bin in which it is aggre- uals from the analysis of the stellar population. A
gated, as explained in 3.4. This is the so-called dezoni- low order polynomial is fitted to the continuum of
fication map. this residual cube in order to remove inaccuracies in
The procedure is done performing the following the spectrophotometric calibration, or template mis-
steps: matches (e.g. Husemann et al. 2013; Cid Fernandes
et al. 2013; Garca-Benito et al. 2015).
An empty datacube is created with the same spatial
and spectral shape as the original cube. The result The final product of this analysis is the so called pure
of the dezonification procedure will be stored in emission line cube, and it is stored in a FITS format file
this datacube. named GAS.OBJ.cube.fits.gz.
As indicated before ( 3.4 and 3.4.3), for each cube

a CS-binning was performed, extracting a RSS-file
that was fitted with a SSP stellar library (plus emis- 3.5. Analysis of the strong emission lines
sion lines). This provides a multi-SSP model for
each spatial bin. An analysis of the emission lines using the pure emis-
sion line cube is implemented in order to derive the prop-
For all the spaxels within the same spatial bin the erties of the ionized gas with the best spatial resolution,
same multi-SSP model is adopted, which is stored and independently of the S/N required to analyze the con-
in the empty datacube described before at the corre- tinuum. The strongest emission lines in the wavelength
sponding spatial coordinates of each spaxel. range studied (from the list described in 3.4.3) are fitted
with a single Gaussian function. This parametrization,
Repeating this procedure for all the spatial bins, we implemented in the current version of P3D is valid for
end up with a datacube where the SSP-model corre- most of the emission lines observed over a large fraction
sponding to each spaxel is stored. However, in this of the optical extension of the galaxies. However, this
datacube the spectra corresponding to the spaxels approach is too simplistic in some cases (e.g., gas rich
within the same spatial bin are all the same, keep- major mergers, overlapping foreground galaxies, or cores
ing the spatial shape of the CS-segmentation. of AGNs). In future versions of the pipeline we will im-
plement a multi-component analysis (already foreseen in
This preliminary model datacube is multiplied by
FIT3D). The only limitation of this approach is the that
the dezonification map to match the flux intensity
the analysis will be more time consuming.
of each spectral model with that of the original
The emission lines are grouped into four groups that
cube, spaxel-by-spaxel. The dezonification map, ex-
are considered to be kinematically coupled (for simplic-
plained in 3.4, is the ratio between the broad-band
ity). Each group is fitted within a wavelength range, ad-
intensity maps of the original and CS-segmented
justed to the observed frame on the basis of the galaxy
datacubes. Thus, it is the relative contribution of
redshift. The four groups include the following emission
each spaxel to the intensity in the corresponding
lines and rest frame wavelength ranges: (i) [O ]3727
spatial bin.
(3700-3750); (ii) H, [O ] 4959, and [O ] 5007
Then, in order to take into account the mismatch (4800-5050); (iii) [N ] 6548, H, and [N ] 6583
between adjacent spectra corresponding to differ- (6530-6630); and [S ]6717 and [S ]6731 (6680-
ent spatial bins, the new cube is smoothed spatially 6770). Before any of these lines is fitted with a single
with a Gaussian kernel having the size of the ex- Gaussian, a first guess for the kinematics is done on the
pected PSF of the datacubes (2.5 -3 ), preserving basis of the expected H wavelength at the galaxy red-
the flux intensity in each spatial resolution element. shift and by performing a parabolic approximation to the
centroid of the emission line. This procedure is broadly
The product of this procedure is a cube com- used in the detection of peak intensity fluxes, like in the
prising a model of the underlying stellar popu- case of the reduction of fiber fed spectrographs, being
lation with a continous spectral shape and ad- fast and very reliable (e.g. Sanchez 2006a). Then the
justed to the flux intensity of the original cube. emission lines are fitted using a narrow range of systemic
This cube is stored in a FITS format file named velocities centered on the initial guess, and limiting their
SSP mod.OBJ.cube.fits.gz. width to the nominal instrumental dispersion.
188
SANCHEZ ET AL.
15
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

30
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

3800
H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2) Est.
H vel. FWHM () Est.

10
H vel (km/s) Est.
-0.1 0 0.1 -10 0 10
20
-1 0 1
3600
5
10
0
10 20 30 3600 3800 0 5 10 15
H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2) Fitted H vel (km/s) Fitted H vel. FWHM () Fitted
Fig. 11. Comparison between the integrated flux intensity (left panel), velocity (central panel), and velocity dispersion (FWHM,
right panel) for the H emission line extracted from the pure emission line cubes from the CALIFA V500 based on the Gaussian fits
described in 3.5 (x-axis), versus the values derived using the algorithm described in 3.6 (y-axis). The error bars indicate the errors
estimated by each procedure. For the velocity and velocity dispersion we show only the 2700 spaxels for which the H flux density
is larger than 0.5 1016 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 . In each panel the inset shows the normalized histogram of the difference between the
two estimations. The color figure can be viewed online.
The result of this analysis is a set of maps with MaNGA data than in the CALIFA ones, due to the lower
the spatial shape of the pure emission line cube, S/N of the former. The final MaNGA observing strategy
which includes the various parameters derived for (Law et al. 2015), with a minimum goal for the S/N, guar-
each emission line as described in 3.4.3. These antees that this will not be the case for the final dataset.
maps are stored in a set of FITS format files, named However, for the P-MaNGA data a fixed exposure time
map.W1 W2.OBJ PARAM NN.fits.gz, where OBJ is the was selected, which has a larger effect on the continuum
galaxy name (as it appears in the name of the dat- S/N at this spectral resolution.
acube), PARAM is a label indicating each of the de-
rived dataproducts, W1 and W2 are the wavelength
3.6. Analysis of the weak emission lines
ranges of each emission line group, as described
above, and NN is an index indicating the order of the So far we have characterized the strongest and more
emission line within each group. For example, the frequently observed (and studied) emission lines within
FITS file map.6530 6630.NGC2916 flux 00.fits.gz the wavelength range considered. However, there are
stores the flux density of H obtained from the pure emis- many more weak emission lines. Table 1 lists the usual
sion line cube derived for CALIFA V500 data of NGC emission lines observed in ionized regions of our Galaxy
2916. The emission line fluxes are not corrected for ex- in the common wavelength range between the three IFU
tinction. This should be accomplished by the usual pro- surveys considered here. This list was extracted from
cedures, e.g. analyzing the Balmer line ratios, as we will those detected in classical H regions, like the Orion
describe in 4. Like in the previous cases, an example nebula (Baldwin et al. 1991; Sanchez et al. 2007c). Those
of these files is stored in the FTP indicated above and emission lines that are accessible to MaNGA only due to
described in 3.7. its larger wavelength coverage are indicated.
Figure 10 illustrates the result of this analysis, show- It is not practical to perform a Gaussian fit, like the
ing the H flux intensity and velocity maps derived from one described in the previous section, for all the 50
the pure emission line cube. On the other hand, Fig- emission lines and for all the spectra in each datacube,
ure 9 highlights the differences between the parameters since it is very time consuming. Therefore, we have
derived when the analysis of the emission lines is, or is adopted a different scheme to extract the main proper-
not, coupled with the spatial binning required to analyze ties of these emission lines: flux intensity, velocity and
the stellar population. As anticipated, the emission lines velocity dispersion, and equivalent width.
are blurred in those areas where the continuum intensity This procedure is not a Gaussian fit, but rather a direct
is lower, and therefore larger spatial bins are required to estimation of these parameters. It requires as input the
achieve a sufficient S/N. In some cases the gas kinematics pure emission line and the stellar population model cubes
is also clearly affected. The effect is stronger in the P- described in 3.4 and 3.4.4, together with an error cube
TABLE 1 using the formula:

LIST OF EMISSION LINES ANALYZED

mc
(i obs )2
F0,i = Iimc in 2 exp 0.5 (3)
2in
() Id () Id () Id
mc
where F0,i is the integrated flux intensity of the emis-
3727.4 [O ] 4413.8 [Fe ] 5577.3 [O ]
sion line estimated from the measured flux density (Iimc )
3750.0 H12 4416.3 [Fe ] 5754.5 [N ] at the spectral point i, and for the MC realization (mc);
3771.0 H11 4471.0 He 5875.6 He (iv) Then, for each MC loop, an average of the integrated
3798.0 H10 4657.9 [Fe ] 6300.3 [O ] flux intensities is derived for all the spectral points in the
3819.4 He 4686.0 He 6312.4 [S ] wavelength range considered. The estimation is more ac-
3835.0 H9 4713.0 He 6347.3 SiII curate for those spectral points near the peak intensity
3869.0 [Ne ] 4922.2 He 6363.8 [O ] of the emission line (due to the higher S/N). Therefore
3889.0 H8 4861.3 H 6562.7 H a weighted average is performed, with the weights fol-
3967.0 [Ne ] 4889.6 [Fe ] 6583.4 [N ] lowing a Gaussian distribution centered on the observed
3970.1 He 4905.3 [Fe ] 6548.1 [N ] wavelength of the emission line and with a dispersion
4026.3 He 4958.9 [O ] 6678.0 He in ; (v) Once the integrated flux intensity is derived, the
4069.2 [S ] 5006.8 [O ] 6716.4 [S ] procedure is repeated solving Equation 3 for the velocity
4076.7 [S ] 5111.6 [Fe ] 6730.7 [S ] (v), given in km/s:
4101.7 H 5158.8 [Fe ] 7136.0 [Ar ] v
t
4276.8 [Fe ] 5199.6 [NI] 7325.0* [O ]* mc
F 0

obs,i = i 2in ln , (4)
4287.4 [Fe ] 5261.6 [Fe ] 7751.0* [Ar ]* Iimc in 2
4319.6 [Fe ] 5517.7 [Cl ] 9068.6* [S ]*
where:
4340.5 H 5537.6 [Cl ] 9530.6* [S ]*
4363.2 [O ] 5554.9 O vmc
!
i
mc
obs,i = rest 1+ , (5)
*
Accessible to MaNGA only. c
and rest is the rest frame nominal wavelength of the
emission line, c is the speed of light, and vmc i is the ve-
locity estimated for each MC realization at each spectral
provided by the data reduction. In addition, it requires a point i. As in the previous case, a weighted average is
list of the emission lines to be analyzed, with their cor- derived as the best estimation of obs and v;
responding identifications and nominal wavelengths (like (vi) Finally the velocity dispersion () is estimated on
in Table 1), and an estimation of the gas velocity (in km/s) the basis of the second order moment of the distribution,
and velocity dispersion, including the instrumental dis- for each MC realization. This approach is adopted due to
persion, in . The output of the H emission analysis the complexity of solving Equation 3 for this parameter:
described in 3.5 is adopted for these latter entries.
Iimc (i obs )2
After reading the required input, the algorithm per- 2mc,i = . (6)
Iimc
forms the following steps: (i) For each emission line
in the list, and for each spectrum in the pure emis- It is then transformed to FWHM by the scaling factor
sion line cube, it estimates the expected observed cen- (FWHM = 2.354). The dispersion also includes the in-
tral wavelength of the emission line taking into ac- strumental resolution, that should be subtracted quadrat-
count the initial guessed velocity (obs ). Then a wave- ically in any further analysis; (vii) In addition, the EW
length range is selected within FWHM of the emis- of the corresponding emission line is obtained by di-
sion line, derived from the initial guessed dispersion viding the intensity by the flux density of the underly-
(in ): [obs 2.354in , obs +2.354in ]; (ii) Within this ing continuum, derived as the average within two 30
wavelength range a set of 50 MC realizations of the spec- wide spectral windows centered at 60 from obs , of
tra are performed, by co-adding to the original flux the er- the spectrum extracted from the stellar population model
ror noise multiplied by a random number between 0.5; (i.e., once the emission lines are subtracted). The band
(iii) For each MC realization (mc), and for each spectral width is large enough to smooth out any significant con-
pixel (i) at a wavelength i , the extended flux intensity is tribution by most of the stellar absorption features, al-
estimated if the emission line was well characterized by a though some effect is impossible to avoid; (vi) The av-
Gaussian function centered at obs with a dispersion in , erage and the standard deviation of the four parameters
190
SANCHEZ ET AL.
obtained for each MC realization and for each spaxel are in Table 1. Its disadvantage is that it requires a prior es-
derived and stored in a set of 2D arrays with the same timation of the properties of the gas kinematics. For this
spatial shape as the original cube; (viii) The final dat- reason, in P3D we first perform a Gaussian fit for a
aproducts for each emission line comprise eight 2D ar- set of strong emission lines and we adopt the new algo-
rays, four for the parameters derived and four more for rithm for a much wider set of weaker (in general) emis-
the errors. The complete set of 2D arrays for all the sion lines. We are exploring alternative solutions to speed
emission lines analyzed is stored in a datacube named up the process even more.
flux elines.OBJ.cube.fits.gz, in which each 2D
slice corresponds to a particular dataproduct (or its er- 3.6.1. Stellar Indices
ror) for each of the emission lines analyzed. The header
comprises a set of keywords named NAMEXX that store the A classical technique to characterize the properties
correspondence of the slice XX to a particular emission of the stellar population in galaxies is to measure cer-
line and dataproduct. We note once more that emission tain line strength indices, such as the Lick/IDS index sys-
tem (e.g. Burstein et al. 1984; Faber et al. 1985; Burstein
line fluxes are not corrected for internal extinction in the

galaxy. et al. 1986; Gorgas et al. 1993; Worthey 1994). When
comparing with the expected values derived using stel-
Figure 11 shows the comparison between the param- lar population synthesis models, indices can be used to
eters derived using this algorithm and the values de- infer stellar population parameters such as age, metallic-
rived using the Gaussian fitting procedure for H when ity, and enhancement (e.g. Trager et al. 2000; Gallazzi
analyzing the pure emission line cube for the CALIFA et al. 2005). They provide robust, model-independent,
V500 dataset. The integrated flux intensity is the pa- information, complementary to that provided by fitting
rameter that presents the smallest differences between the full spectrum with multi-SSP templates, as described
the two procedures (F=0.020.25 1016 erg s1 cm2 ). in 3.4. In general, the method employs a combination
For the velocity the agreement is within the expec- of indices mostly orthogonal in the physical parameter
tated errors (vel=9.611.7 km/s). The largest rela- space (i.e. age and metallicity), like D4000 or H (sen-
tive differences are found for the velocity dispersion, sitive to the age), and Mgb or [MgFe] (sensitive to the
although they lie within the expectations from the es- metallicity), where [MgFe] is a combined stellar index,
timated errors (=0.80.66 , which corresponds to given by the formula:
vel = 37 31 km/s). No correction is applied based on
these differences, since a priori we do not know which of p
[MgFe] = Mgb (0.72Fe5270 + 0.28Fe5335 ) (7)
the two results is more accurate. More simulations are
required in this regard. As briefly described in Paper I, 4, FIT3D in-
cludes a script to derive the equivalent widths of a
In general, when the emission lines are well de- predefined set of stellar indices. The algorithm fol-
blended this algorithm produces reliable results. Indeed, lows the prescriptions implemented in (Cardiel
based on extensive simulations as described in Paper I et al. 2003), slightly modified to take into account
( 3.3), the accuracy of the recovered parameters is very the format of the dataset analyzed. It requires as
similar to that estimated for the Gaussian fits. However, it input the output from the previous analysis, described
seems that there is a non negligible systematic offset be- in 3.4 and 3.4.3. In particular, it uses the files
tween the kinematic parameters derived from both meth- output.auto ssp.CS.OBJECT.rss.out.fits.gz
ods; this should be clarified by simulations. Like in the and auto ssp.CS.OBJECT.rss.out, and a number
case of the method described in 3.5 (assuming a sin- of MC simulations. The algorithm uses the spectrum,
gle Gaussian function per emission line), this procedure after subtracting the strong emission lines for each
is not valid to analyze heavily blended emission lines, spatial-bin, and it takes the residuals from the analysis
such as multi-component kinematics and/or broad emis- of the stellar population as a hint of the noise pattern,
sion lines due to outflows or AGNs. in order to perform a set of MC realizations of the
The major advantage of this procedure is speed. Us- data. Then it estimates the equivalent width for each
ing a single core i7 processor it takes about one hour to of the stellar indices using the formula included in
analyze a single emission line using the Gaussian fitting for each of the MC realizations. The bandwidths
algorithm described in 3.5 for a CALIFA-like datacube adopted to derive the equivalent width are redshifted
(or a MaNGA datacube for the bundles with the largest to the observed wavelength range using the velocity
FoVs). In contrast, for the direct estimation procedure it estimated for each spectrum from the analysis of the
takes 3 minutes to analyze the 50 emission lines listed stellar population, included in the input files. Finally,
TABLE 2
LIST OF STELLAR INDICES ANALYZED
Index Index range () blue range () red range ()
H 4083.500-4122.250 4041.600-4079.750 4128.500-4161.000
Hmod 4083.500-4122.250 4079.000-4083.000 4128.500-4161.000
H 4319.750-4363.50 4283.500-4319.75 4367.250-4419.750
H 4847.875-4876.625 4827.875-4847.875 4876.625-4891.625
Mgb 5160.125-5192.625 5142.625-5161.375 5191.375-5206.375
Fe5270 5245.650-5285.650 5233.150-5248.150 5285.650-5318.150
Fe5335 5312.125-5352.125 5304.625-5315.875 5353.375-5363.375
D4000 4050.000-4250.000 3750.000-3950.000
4
5
1.5
D4000 ()
H ()
Mgb
2
1
0
0.5
7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10
log(age/yr) LW log(age/yr) LW log(age/yr) LW
2
4
5
1.5
D4000 ()
H ()
Mgb
2
1
0
0.5
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2
[Z/H] LW [Z/H] LW [Z/H] LW
Fig. 12. Comparison of a set of stellar indices (D4000, H and Mgb) and the luminosity-weighted ages and -metallicities derived for
the spatially binned spectra extracted from the CALIFA V500 datacube of NGC 2916. The color figure can be viewed online.
the average and the standard deviation for the different bandwidths were selected to be compatible with
values estimated for each MC simulation are derived. (Cardiel et al. 2003), an algorithm that allows the esti-
These parameters are stored in an ASCII file named matation of the age and metallicity of the stellar popula-
indices.CS.OBJ.rss.out, that is later transformed to tion based on a comparison with the expected values of
a datacube named indices.CS.OBJ.cube.fits.gz a pair of indices with the corresponding ones of a stel-
by associating the value to the location in the 2D space lar template, as described in Paper I, 4. This procedure
defined by the segmentation file described in 3.3. was already used in the analysis of previous IFU data,
This final datacube comprises a set of slices, each one as described in Sanchez et al. (2011) and Sanchez et al.
including the value derived for the stellar index (mean (2012).
value) and its estimated error (standard deviation). The dependence of the different stellar indices on the
Table 2 shows the list of stellar indices included in age and metallicity of single stellar populations has been
the analysis, along with the adopted bandwidths for each explored in detail using SSP models or more complex
index, and the blue and red wavelength ranges from SFHs (e.g. Poggianti & Barbaro 1997). To illustrate how
which the continuum is estimated. By construction, these the derived stellar indices compare with the luminosity-
192
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE FLUX ELINES.OBJ.CUBE.FITS.GZ DATAPRODUCT
Keyword/Slice Value Description
NAME0 flux [OII]3727 Integrated flux of [O ]3727 in 1016 erg s1 cm2
NAME51 vel [OII]3727 Velocity of [O ]3727 in km/s
NAME102 disp [OII]3727 Velocity dispersion FWHM of [O ]3727 in
NAME153 EW [OII]3727 Equivalent width of [O ]3727 in
NAME204 e flux [OII]3727 Estimated error of the integrated flux of [O ]3727 in 1016 erg s1 cm2
NAME255 e vel [OII]3727 Estimated error of the velocity of [O ]3727 in km/s
NAME306 e disp [OII]3727 Estimated error of the velocity dispersion of [O ]3727 in
NAME357 e EW [OII]3727 Estimated error of the Equivalent width of [O ]3727 in
... ... ...

NAME50 flux [SII]6731 Integrated flux of [S ]6731 in 1016 erg s1 cm2
NAME101 vel [SII]6731 Velocity of [S ]6731 in km/s
NAME152 disp [SII]6731 Velocity dispersion FWHM of [S ]6731 in
NAME203 EW [SII]6731 Equivalent width of [S ]6731 in
NAME254 e flux [SII]6731 Estimated error of the integrated flux of [S ]6731 in 1016 erg s1 cm2
NAME305 e vel [SII]6731 Estimated error of the velocity dispersion of [S ]6731 in
NAME356 e disp [SII]6731 Estimated error of the velocity dispersion of [S ]6731 in
NAME407 e EW [SII]6731 Estimated error of the equivalent width of [S ]6731 in
TABLE 4
DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJ.SFH.CUBE.FITS.GZ DATAPRODUCT
Keyword/Slice Value/Description
DESC 0 Luminosity Fraction for age-met 0.0010-0.0037 SSP
... ...
DESC 156 Luminosity Fraction for age 0.0010 SSP
... ...
DESC 195 Luminosity Fraction for met 0.0037 SSP
weighted ages and metallicities derived from the proce- indices are sensitive to other physical parameters. It is
dure described in 3.4 we show a few of them in Fig- beyond the scope of this article to study this effect in de-
ure 12. As expected, there is a clear trend between the tail, since our aim is to show the different dataproducts
stellar indices and the corresponding physical parameter delivered by Pipe3D. These results will be analyzed in
to which they are sensitive. It is also known that those future studies.
TABLE 5
DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJ.SSP.CUBE.FITS.GZ DATAPRODUCT
DESC 0 V-band map reconstructed from the original cube.
DESC 1 CS segmentation map.
DESC 2 Dezonification map.
DESC 3 Average intensity flux within the wavelength range, in 1016 erg s1 cm2 1 .
DESC 4 Standard deviation of the flux within the wavelength range, in 1016 erg s1 cm2 1 .
DESC 5 Luminosity weighted age of the stellar population in log(age/yr).
DESC 6 Mass weighted age of the stellar population in log(age/yr).
DESC 7 Error of the age of the stellar population in age/age.
DESC 8 Luminosity weighted metallicity of the stellar population in log(Z/Z ).

DESC 9 Mass weighted metallicity of the stellar population in log(Z/Z ).
DESC 10 Error metallicity of the stellar population in Z/Z.
DESC 11 Dust attenuation of the stellar population (AV,stars ) in mag.
DESC 12 Error of the average dust attenuation of the stellar population in mag.
DESC 13 Velocity of the stellar population in km/s.
DESC 14 Error in the velocity of the stellar population in km/s.
DESC 15 Velocity dispersion of the stellar population in km/s.
DESC 16 Error in velocity dispersion of the stellar population in km/s.
DESC 17 Average mass-to-light ratio of the stellar population in Solar Units.
DESC 18 Stellar mass density in M /arcsec2 , not dust corrected.
DESC 19 Stellar mass density in M /arcsec2 , dust corrected using the Av,stars .
3.7. Packing of the dataproducts order to allow the user to dezonify a particular inte-
P3D produces a large number of intermediate data- grated property and identify in an easy way which spax-
products that are usually stored either as FITS files, cor- els are binned together; (4) A total of three dataproduct
responding to the maps containing the values and er- cubes, in addition to those already described correspond-
rors of each of the estimated parameters, or as ASCII ing to the stellar indices ( 3.6.1) and the weak emission
files, as tables with the different parameters listed either lines ones ( 3.6), are delivered comprising: (i) the dat-
for each spaxel or for each spatial bin. Since the main aproducts derived from the analysis of the stellar popu-
goal of this pipeline is to produce dataproducts that are lation (OBJ.SSP.cube.fits.gz); (ii) the dataproducts
easily distributed, shared and compared between differ- describing the stellar decomposition or star formation
ent researchers and for different surveys, we have pro- history (OBJ.SFH.cube.fits.gz); (iii) the dataprod-
vided a simple solution: (1) All dataproducts are stored ucts describing the properties of the strong emission lines
in 2D maps following the spatial shape of the original (OBJ.ELINES.cube.fits.gz). Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6
datacubes, and keeping the original WCS; (2) then, those list the descriptions of the different dataproducts stored
corresponding to a similar kind of analysis are packed in each slice for each of the datacubes, as indicated in the
together and stored in datacubes with the same spatial header keywords.
shape of the dataproducts (and the original cube), which
correspond to a set of maps arbitrarily ordered along the 4. A PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF PIPE3D
3rd dimension, with a header keyword (DEC XX) indicat- Along this article we have described in detail the dif-
ing which parameter is stored in each slice (XX) of the ferent procedures implemented in P3D to character-
datacube; (3) the dataproducts corresponding to spatial ize the physical properties of the stellar populations and
bins are resampled to the original spatial shape with- the ionized gas of galaxies observed by the major cur-
out any interpolation, just associating the same value to rently on-going IFU surveys. In this section we present
all the spaxels corresponding to the same spatial bin. a practical implementation showing the results of apply-
The segmentation and dezonification files are stored in ing P3D to a particular dataset: the 200 cubes that
194
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 6
DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJ.ELINES.CUBE.FITS.GZ DATAPRODUCT
DESC 0 H velocity map, km/s.
DESC 1 H emission line velocity dispersion, FWHM in .
DESC 2 [O ]3727 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 3 [O III]5007 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 4 [O III]4959 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 5 H emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 6 H emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 7 [N II]6583 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 8 [N II]6548 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .

DESC 9 [S II]6731 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 10 [S II]6717 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 11 [O ]3727 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 12 [O III]5007 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 13 [O III]4959 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 14 H emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 15 H emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 16 [N II]6583 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 17 [N II]6548 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 18 [S II]6731 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
DESC 19 [S II]6717 emission line flux error in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .
comprise the CALIFA DR2 for the V500 setup (Garca- with those reported in previous studies (Sanchez et al.
Benito et al. 2015)16 . 2013; Walcher et al. 2014; Catalan-Torrecilla et al. 2015),
for the galaxies in common. Walcher et al. (2014) derived
The list of individual objects, including their nominal the stellar mass density for the full CALIFA mother sam-
names and the corresponding CALIFA identifications, to- ple using the full available photometric dataset for these
gether with the coordinates, is given in Appendix B, Ta- galaxies, from the UV to the NIR, and performing a SED
ble 8 In addition, the table includes some of the main fitting using P (PI: Walcher). By construction,
global properties derived by Pipe3D: (i) the redshift, (ii) all galaxies listed in Table 7 were analyzed by Walcher
the stellar mass integrated within the FoV of the dat- et al. (2014). We found an offset of 0.29 dex, with a dis-
acubes; (ii) the corresponding star formation rate17 . We persion of 0.18 dex around this offset. Sanchez et al.
should note that we have co-added all the emission within (2013) derived the stellar mass using the SDSS photome-
the FoV irrespectively of the nature of the ionization. try and the Bell & de Jong (2001) M/L relations with the
Therefore, the SFR listed here should be considered as color for the galaxies currently available for the on-going
a linear transformation of the H luminosity in a general CALIFA survey. For the 110 galaxies in common, we
sense. The errors derived by Pipe3D have been propa- found a similar offset with a smaller dispersion around
gated and included in the table. it ( log(M) = 0.24 0.13 dex). The offset between the
Figure 13 shows a comparison of these parameters two derived masses is expected, since the former ones are
derived using the Chabrier (2003) IMF, which produces
16 http://califa.caha.es/DR2/
17 The H flux for each spaxel in the FoV is corrected for dust at-
masses of the order of 0.55 smaller than those adopted in
tenuation, derived from the Balmer ratio (H/H) spaxel by spaxel, as-
the current implementation of Pipe3D Salpeter (1955), as
suming a canonical line ratio of 2.86, the Milky-Way extinction law indicated before. Once this offset is removed, the agree-
(Cardelli et al. 1989), and a Milky-Way specific dust attenuation of ment between the different estimations of the masses is
RV =3.1. Then it is transformed to absolute luminosity using the stan- remarkably good, taking into account the overall photo-
dard cosmology (H0 =71 km/s/Mpc, M =0.27, =0.73), and trans-
formed to SFR adopting the Kennicutt (1998) empirical relation
metric accuracy of the CALIFA datacubes (5%, Garca-
12
12
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

11
11
-0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 0 0.5
10
10
9
8
8
8 9 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12
1
1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
-0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 0 0.5

0
0
-1
-1
-1 0 1 -1 0 1
Fig. 13. Comparison of the integrated properties derived using P3D listed in Table 7 for the galaxies comprising the CALIFA DR2
sample with previously published results using different procedures. In each panel the inset shows the normalized histogram of the
difference between the two estimations of the parameter. The color figure can be viewed online.
Benito et al. 2015). Catalan-Torrecilla et al. (2015) de- global dust attenuation correction using the H/H ra-
rived the star formation rate for a subset of the CALIFA tio, and an aperture correction for those galaxies larger
galaxies, 147 of them, included in the DR2. The SFR than the CALIFA FoV. Although there is a clear correla-
was estimated using the H flux (Kennicutt 1998) de- tion between the SFRs derived here and those reported by
rived over an integrated elliptical aperture, performing a Catalan-Torrecilla et al. (2015), there is a non-negligible
196
SANCHEZ ET AL.
Ha [NII]6584 [NII]6548 HeI6678 [SII]6717 [SII]6731
2
log (Flux/10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) NGC2916
[ClIII] OI [OI] [NII] HeI5876 [OI] [SIII] SiII [OI]
1
[OIII]4959 Hb [FeII] [FeII] [FeII] [FeII] [NI] [FeII] [ClIII]
DEC (arcsec)
[OIII]4363 [FeII] [FeII] HeI4471 [FeIII] HeII HeI4713 HeI4922 [OIII]5007

0
He HeI4026 [SII] [SII] Hd [FeII] [FeII] [FeII] Hg
-1
[OII]3727 H12 H11 H10 HeI3819 H9 [NeIII] H8 [NeIII]
RA (arcsec)
Fig. 14. Flux intensity maps for all the emission lines listed in Table 1 and analyzed following the procedure described in 3.6, in
units of 1017 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 , derived for NGC 2916. The color figure can be viewed online.
dispersion around the one-to-one relation and a trend dex). Two reasons account for this difference: (i) first,
towards lower values compared with those derived by in Sanchez et al. (2013) a relation between the SFR and
P3D is present (log(SFR) =0.120.26 dex). In that the H luminosity was assumed:
regard, we should note that since Catalan-Torrecilla et al.
(2015) carried out a comparison with other SFR tracers S FR(M yr1 ) = 8.9 1042 LH (erg s1 ) , (8)
that could only be measured as global properties, the ion-
while here we assumed the more standard one:
ized gas extinction values and the extinction corrected
SFR were derived using aperture corrected integrated
spectra. In our case, the SFR were computed spaxel-by- S FR(M yr1 ) = 7.9 1042 LH (erg s1 ) , (9)
spaxel, which commonly require slightly different (local)
SFR recipes (Calzetti 2001), and they were not corrected and (ii) in Sanchez et al. (2013) the Hyperleda dis-
for the fraction of SFR coming from outside of the PPAK tance modulus (Paturel et al. 2003, , http://leda.
FoV. These differences could by themselves explain the univ-lyon1.fr), was used instead of the one derived
dispersion and offset found for a fraction of the targets by the estimated reshift. In general, we consider that the
in our sample. Finally, Sanchez et al. (2013) derived the properties obtained using P3D show a good agreement
SFR by co-adding the H flux of the H regions within with the previously reported values when taking into ac-
the FoV of the galaxies, performing a global dust attenu- count the different nature of the analyses.
ation correction using the average dust extinction derived The dataproduct cubes from which we have de-
for those regions in each galaxy. Although there is a clear rived these integrated properties, as described in
offset between the SFR derived, the dispersion around 3.7, are freely accessible at the following FTP ad-
this offset is rather low ( log(S FR) = 0.230.11 dress ftp://ftp.caha.es/CALIFA/dataproducts/
03.5481 04.4668 06.3096 07.9433 10.0000 12.5893 14.1254
00.5012 00.7079 00.8913 01.1220 01.2589 01.4125 01.9953 02.5119
2
00.0708 00.1000 00.1122 00.1259 00.1585 00.1995 00.2818 00.3548
DEC (arcsec)
00.0178 00.0199 00.0251 00.0316 00.0398 00.0562 00.0630 00.0631
0
00.0010 00.0030 00.0040 00.0056 00.0089 00.0100 00.0126 00.0141
RA (arcsec)
Fig. 15. Cumulative stellar mass density at different lookback times derived from the analysis of the stellar population of NGC 2916.
The color figure can be viewed online.
DR2/Pipe3D; a table summarizing the properties of these weak emission lines the maps just show a noisy pattern,
galaxies is included. 18 . The H intensity maps for all as expected since not all the emission lines are bright
the galaxies analyzed with P3D have been included in enough everywhere.
Appendix A, illustrating the content of the dataproduct
Finally, along this article we have illustrated the av-
cubes delivered. We may notice that, down to our detec-
erage quantities derived from the analysis of the stel-
tion limit, all the galaxies present ionized gas, with a dis-
lar population: luminosity-weighted age and -metallicity,
tribution that reflects the nature of the ionization. In spi-
and stellar dust attenuation. However, as indicated in Pa-
ral galaxies the gas shows the typical clumpy distribution
per I F3D provides the full star formation and chemi-
associated with the H regions, which follows the spiral
cal enrichment histories (e.g., Figure 7 & 9 of that ar-
arms. In earlier type galaxies the ionization is dominated
ticle), and when implemented in P3D it also provides
by a low-intensity/diffuse component, most probably as-
the corresponding spatially resolved versions of both dat-
sociated with pAGB stars (e.g. Papaderos et al. 2013),
aproducts. As an example of this analysis we present
and/or an AGN.
in Figure 15 the cumulative stellar mass density (,t )
Morever, the dataproducts distributed comprise simi-
along cosmological time, i.e., the stellar mass density
lar information for several ion species, not only H. Fig-
as a function of lookback time, derived from the stel-
ure 14 shows the intensity maps of all the emission lines
lar population analysis of the CALIFA V500 setup data
analyzed for NGC 2916 listed in Table 1. For most of the
of NGC 2916. This ,t distribution has been analyzed
18 ftp://ftp.caha.es/CALIFA/dataproducts/DR2/Pipe3D/ to determine whether galaxies grow their stellar mass
table_DR2_Pipe3D.csv inside-out or out-in, as well as the difference in mass as-
198
SANCHEZ ET AL.
sembly depending on galaxy properties (e.g. Perez et al.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

10
0
2013, Ibarra-Mede et al., submitted). We should note
here that this procedure is unable to determine where
log(age/yr) mean
-0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 0 0.5
[Z/H] mean
-0.2
those stars were actually formed. Thus, it is unsensitive
9
to radial movements. However, by describing the spatial
distribution of stellar mass at different epochs it shows
-0.4
8
how the mass is assambled, irrespective of the origin of
those stars (in situ star formation or migration).
7
7 8 9 10 -0.4 -0.2 0
log(age/yr) @Re [Z/H] @Re

4.1. The properties at the effective radius
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Previous studies have reported that some properties
8.6
of both stellar populations and ionized gas at the effec-
AV gas mean (mag)
12+log(O/H) mean
tive radius are representative of the average properties of -0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 0 0.5
2
galaxies (e.g. Moustakas et al. 2010; Sanchez et al. 2013;
8.4
Gonzalez Delgado et al. 2015). As an example of the
1
practical use of the dataset analyzed here, we will explore
this result by comparing five of the main dataproducts de-
8.2
0
rived by P3D: The luminosity-weighted stellar log age 0 1 2 3 8.2 8.4 8.6
and metallicity, the dust attenuation of the stellar compo- AV gas @Re (mag) 12+log(O/H) @Re
nent, the dust attenuation derived for the ionized gas, and
0 0.1 0.2 0.3

the gas phase oxygen abundance.
1
The average values have been obtained as the mean
AV ssp mean (mag)

values across the optical extension of the galaxies, with- -0.5 0 0.5
out a weighing, or rejection process for the stellar popula-
0.5
tion as derived directly from FIT3D (Paper I, 2.3) and
shown in Figure 7. The gas phase dust attenuation was
obtained across the optical extension of the galaxy based
0
on the spaxel-by-spaxel H to H line ratio and using the 0 0.5 1
prescriptions described in 4. For the gas phase oxygen AV ssp @Re (mag)
abundance we adopted the O3N2 line ratio and the cali-
brator proposed by Marino et al. (2013). This line ratio Fig. 16. Comparison of the average value and the value at the
involves the use of flux intensities of the following emis- effective radius for four properties of the galaxies: Top-left:
sion lines: [O ], [N ], H, and H. For both the dust Luminosity-weighted log age. Top-right: Luminosity-weighted
attenuation and the oxygen abundance a 3 selection cri- metalliciy. Central-left: Ionized gas dust attenuation. Central-
terion was applied to all the emission lines involved in right: gas phase oxygen abundance. Bottom panel: Dust at-
tenuation of the stellar population. For this latter parameter the
the derivation of the parameters, spaxel-by-spaxel. Once
errors have been truncated to a maximum value of 0.15 mag, for
the map of the different properties was derived, the mean
the sake of clarity. In each panel the inset shows the normalized
value was obtained without any further rejection crite- histogram of the difference between the two estimations of the
ria. Finally, we excluded those average values derived for parameter. The color figure can be viewed online.
galaxies that do not have at least 50 spaxels (an area of 7
arcsec2 ) fulfilling the accuracy criteria indicated above to
derive the considered parameter. The individual values pendix of that article. An intrinsic ellipticity of qo =0.13
resulting from this analysis are listed in Appendix B, Ta- has been taken into account in the deprojection proce-
ble 9. dure. Finally, we excluded those average values at the
The values at the effective radius have been derived effective radius derived for galaxies that did not have at
as the average within an annular ring of 0.75-1.25 effec- least 10 spaxels in the annular ring fulfilling the accuracy
tive radius from the center of the galaxy, after deproject- criteria indicated above to evaluate the parameter. The
ing the 2D distribution of the parameter. For the effec- individual values obtained by this analysis are listed in
tive radius we adopted the value described in Walcher Appendix B, Table 10.
et al. (2014). For the deprojection we adopted the proce- Figure 16 shows the comparison between the aver-
dure described in Sanchez et al. (2014), using the average age values calculated across the optical extension of the
semi-minor to semi-major axis ratio and ellipticity cal- galaxies and the values at the effective radius as described
culated from the isophotal analysis described in the Ap- before. For each of the parameters we perform a least
TABLE 7 This study demonstrates that at least for the param-

AVERAGE AND EFFECTIVE PARAMETERS eters analyzed the values derived at the effective radius
are indeed representative of the average values across the
Par. r 2 / par entire optical extension of galaxies. In other words, it
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) seems that the effective radius is indeed effective, as al-
log(age) 0.98 0.880.07 0.87 0.110.16 ready noticed by Sanchez et al. (2013) and Gonzalez Del-
[Z/H] 0.84 0.530.07 1.36 0.030.06 gado et al. (2015). This result is particularly important for
those IFU surveys that do not cover the entire optical ex-
AV,gas 0.93 1.150.17 7.10 0.000.21
tension for all the sampled galaxies but whose FoV reach
12+log(O/H) 0.95 0.810.01 1.01 0.010.03 at least one effective radius.
AV,ssp 0.83 0.740.08 0.41 0.010.11
(1) Compared parameter; (2) correlation coefficient; (3) slope 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
of the correlation coefficient; (4) reduced 2 with respect to the
Along this article we have described the analysis se-
one-to-one relation; (5) offset with respect to the one-to-one

relation. quence of P3D, a pipeline based on FIT3D, developed
to extract the main properties of the ionized gas and stel-
lar populations from IFS data. In particular we present
the different steps and describe the intermediate and fi-
square linear regression, deriving both the correlation co- nal dataproducts for a set of datacubes extracted from
efficient and the slope of the correlation. In addition, we the MaNGA and CALIFA surveys. This includes: (i)
calculate the reduced 2 / with respect to the one-to-one cube pre-processing; (ii) analysis of the central spec-
relation, and the mean and standard deviation of the dif- trum; (iii) spatial binning to achieve the required S/N
ference between the two parameters. level per spectrum, and a comparison with the most fre-
The results of this analysis are included in Table 7. As quently used binning procedure in the field; (iv) detailed
expected from the inspection of Figure 16, all the param- analysis of the stellar population based on multi-SSP fit-
eters analyzed show a clear and strong correlation, with ting in each spatial bin, including a description of the
large correlation coefficients. In almost all the cases the derived dataproducts; (v) analysis of the emission lines
correlation has a slope near to the one-to-one relation, in the spatially binned spectra; (vi) the required dezoni-
except for the stellar abundance ([Z/H]), which seems fication to recover a spaxel-wise model of the under-
to have a smaller slope. When compared with the one- lying stellar population and a pure emission line dat-
to-one relation, three parameters (log(age), [Z/H], and acube; (vii) the spaxel-wise analysis of the strong and
12+log(O/H)), show a 2 / near to one, indicating that weak emission lines, including a comparison between
their correlation is completely compatible with the unity the derived parameters; (viii) the analysis of the stellar
relation. For the gas phase dust attenuation, the 2 / is indices, showing a comparison/correspondence with the
too large, taking into account that the two derivations of results derived from the multi-SSP fitting procedure; and
this parameter present a strong correlation with a slope finally (ix) a description of the format of the derived dat-
very close to one. We consider that this is due to a clear aproducts provided by each individual step of the anal-
underestimation of the error of AV , which requires a re- ysis. In summary, we present here the current status of
evaluation, rather than an indication of a clear deviation the P3D pipeline, as implemented to analyze the data
from the one-to-one relation. Indeed, including a system- from the three major on-going IFU surveys: CALIFA,
atic error of 0.15 dex in both parameters, the 2 / reaches MaNGA, and SAMI. P3D produces reliable estima-
a value near to one. We find the opposite effect for the tions (as demonstrated in Paper I, 3) of the parameters
stellar dust attenuation. It is clear from Figure 16 that the analyzed, which are coherent within the differences be-
estimated errors are much too large. This may be due to tween the instrumental setups for the three surveys. The
the inclusion of the standard deviation with respect to the use of a single data format for the dataproducts derived
mean values in the error budget, which indicates that the will help to make comparisons between the three surveys
individual derivation of the dust attenuation is not very in a coherent and simple way. P3D has already demon-
stable at each spatial bin. A global reduction of the esti- strated its scientific validity, since it was used to ana-
mated errors in these parameters by about 50% makes lyze: (i) the effects of galaxy interaction in the enhance-
the 2 / reach a value close to one. In general, the dif- ment of the star formation rate and the onset of galactic
ference between each pair of explored parameters is al- outflows, employing CALIFA data (Barrera-Ballesteros
most compatible with zero, or shows very small offsets et al. 2015); (ii) the exploration of the local version of
compared with the overall dispersion and the individual the star forming main sequence in galaxies using CAL-
estimated errors. IFA data (Cano-Daz et al. in press); and (iii) the explo-
200
SANCHEZ ET AL.
ration of the evidence of the inside-out scenario in the Based on observations collected at the Centro As-
mass assembly history of galaxies, using MaNGA data tronomico Hispano Aleman (CAHA) at Calar Alto, op-
(Ibarra Mede et al. in preparation). erated jointly by the Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie
As a practical implementation we present the dat- and the Instituto de Astrofsica de Andaluca (CSIC).
aproducts provided by P3D for the publicly accessi- Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Al-
ble datacubes of the 200 galaxies that comprise the V500 fred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,
setup of the CALIFA DR2. We illustrate the content the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Depart-
of the dataproducts delivered showing the H intensity ment of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III web
maps for all of them, as well as the intensity maps of site is http://www.sdss3.org/. SDSS-III is managed
all the emission lines analyzed for NGC 2916, together by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Partic-
with the stellar mass assembly history of this galaxy. For ipating Institutions of the SDSS-III Collaboration includ-
all these galaxies we list a set of parameters that char- ing the University of Arizona, the Brazilian Participation
acterize their properties, including the integrated stellar Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Carnegie Mel-
mass and star formation within the aperture of the IFU, lon University, University of Florida, the French Partici-
the mean luminosity-weighted log age and -metallicity, pation Group, the German Participation Group, Harvard
the dust attenuation for the stellar populations, as well as University, the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the
the oxygen abundance and dust attenuation of the ionized Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group,
gas, both derived across the full optical extension of the Johns Hopkins University, Lawrence Berkeley National
galaxies and at the effective radius. Finally, we demon- Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Max
strate that, as suggested by previous studies, the values Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, New Mex-
at the effective radius are indeed characteristic of the av- ico State University, New York University, Ohio State
erage values of the parameters across the entire optical University, Pennsylvania State University, University of
extension of the galaxies. Portsmouth, Princeton University, the Spanish Partici-
pation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah,
Vanderbilt University, University of Virginia, University
of Washington, and Yale University.
SFS thanks the director of CEFCA, M. Moles, for

his sincere support to this project. SFS thanks the
CONACYT-125180 and DGAPA-IA100815 projects for
providing support for this study. APPENDICES
We acknowledge support from the Spanish Minis- A. H INTENSITY MAPS
terio de Economa y Competitividad, through projects
AYA2010-15081 and AYA2010-10904E, and Junta de Figure 17 shows the individual H intensity maps
Andaluca FQ1580. EP acknowledges support from the for all the galaxies analyzed, obtained using P3D
IA-UNAM and from the Guillermo Haro program at as described in 3.6. As indicated above, simi-
INAOE. lar intensity maps and their corresponding errors and
Support for LG is provided by the Ministry of Econ- kinematic properties have been derived for all the
omy, Development, and Tourisms Millennium Science emission lines listed in Table 1, and included in
Initiative through grant IC120009, awarded to The Mil- the flux elines.OBJ.cube.fits.gz datacube (where
lennium Institute of Astrophysics, MAS. LG acknowl- OBJ is the name of the corresponding object).
edges support by CONICYT through FONDECYT grant
3140566.
This study uses data provided by the Calar Alto
Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey (http:
B. CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTIES OF THE
//califa.caha.es/). CALIFA is the first legacy sur-
GALAXIES.
vey performed at Calar Alto. The CALIFA collabora-
tion would like to thank the IAA-CSIC and MPIA-MPG Table 8 shows the list of individual galaxies dis-
as major partners of the observatory, and CAHA itself, tributed in the CALIFA DR2, including their nomi-
for the unique access to telescope time and support in nal designations and the corresponding CALIFA-ID, to-
manpower and infrastructures. The CALIFA collabora- gether with the coordinates. In addition, a few of the
tion also thanks the CAHA staff for the dedication to this main global properties derived by Pipe3D as described
project. in 4 have been included.
Tables 9 and 10 list the parameters explored in 4.1 dominate the error budget, the dust attenuation of the stel-
for all the galaxies included in the CALIFA DR2. Each lar component being the exception. In this case the fluc-
table lists the average values and the errors, derived by tuations along the average values are much larger than
considering both the individual errors and the standard the typical individual estimation of the error.
deviation of the distribution. Table 9 lists the average An electronic version of these tables can be found
parameters across the optical extension of the galaxies, in: (ftp://ftp.caha.es/CALIFA/dataproducts/
while Table 10 lists the corresponding parameter derived DR2/Pipe3D/).
at the effective radius. In most cases the individual errors
DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec) DEC (arcsec)
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-40
IC5376
-20
NGC5205
NGC4470
NGC3614
NGC0477
NGC0169
-20
UGC05396
UGC04722
UGC03253
UGC01938
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
202
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2/arcsec2)
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
IC1683
-20
NGC5216
NGC4644
NGC3811
NGC3106
NGC2730
NGC2253
NGC1056
NGC0171
-20
UGC00005
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
NGC3991
NGC2880
NGC0499
NGC0180
NGC7819
UGC08733
UGC03539
UGC02222
-20
-20
NGC4676A
-20
-20
-20
UGC05498NED01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
IC0944
IC2487
IC1528
-20
NGC4874
NGC3994
NGC3160
NGC2347
NGC0496
NGC0192
-20
UGC02229
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
IC0540
-20
-20
NGC4003
NGC0528
NGC0216
-20
-20
UGC08778
UGC08107
UGC05598
UGC03899
UGC02403
UGC00036
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
SANCHEZ
-20
NGC3303
NGC2906
NGC2410
NGC1349
NGC0237
NGC0001
-20
-20
UGC08781
UGC08231
UGC07012
UGC01057
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
ET AL.
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
contour is off by 1/5th of the median value. The color figure can be viewed online.
IC1652
-20
-20
NGC5378
NGC4149
NGC2916
NGC1542
NGC0774
NGC0036
-20
-20
UGC08234
UGC05771
-20
UGC03969
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
-20
NGC5394
NGC5000
NGC4185
NGC3381
NGC0776
NGC0444
-20
-20
UGC05108
UGC03995
UGC03107
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
MCG-02-02-030
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
-20
-20
NGC5406
NGC4210
NGC2449
NGC1645
NGC0810
-20
-20
-20
UGC08250
UGC06036
UGC05358
UGC00809
UGC00312
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
IC0776
IC0674
IC2095
-20
-20
NGC5485
NGC0825
-20
UGC08267
UGC05359
UGC04132
UGC00841
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
UGC00335NED02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
the galaxies. The contours are different for each galaxy. The first contour represents the median intensity level, and each successive
Fig. 17. H intensity maps of the galaxies listed in Table 7, in units of 1017 erg s1 cm2 arcsec1 . The color scale is the same for all
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
NGC7563
NGC7321
NGC6310
NGC6032
NGC5908
-20
-20
UGC12688
UGC11649
UGC10972
UGC10380
UGC09067
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
NGC7716
NGC7562
NGC7025
NGC6478
NGC6314
NGC6150
NGC5930
NGC5520
-20
UGC12127
UGC10205
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
NGC7738
NGC7591
NGC6497
NGC6338
NGC6063
NGC5614
UGC12185
UGC11717
UGC10384
UGC09873
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
IC1199
NGC6515
NGC5630
-20
UGC12816
UGC12519
UGC12224
UGC10796
UGC10388
UGC09892
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
MCG-01-54-016
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-40
-20
-20
NGC6173
NGC6081
NGC5966
NGC5682
-20
UGC12518
UGC11792
UGC11228
UGC10811
NGC7436B
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
NGC7783NED01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
IC1256
IC4566
NGC7625
NGC7194
NGC6168
NGC5720
-20
UGC12864
UGC12274
UGC11262
UGC10331
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Fig. 17. Continued

40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-20
NGC7631
NGC6762
NGC6394
NGC6125
NGC5987
-20
UGC12308
UGC11958
UGC10650
UGC09476
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
MCG-01-01-012
0
0
0
PIPE3D, ANALYSIS SEQUENCE
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
NGC7800
NGC7653
NGC7466
NGC6132
NGC6004
NGC5784
-20
-20
-20
UGC11982
UGC10905
UGC10693
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
MCG-02-51-004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
-40
NGC5947
NGC7671
NGC7489
NGC6941
NGC6411
NGC6146
NGC6020
UGC12054
UGC10695
UGC09665
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
-20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40 -20 0 20 40
NGC7683
NGC7549
NGC7311
NGC6978
NGC6427
NGC6154
NGC6021
NGC5888
UGC10710
NGC4676B
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
-20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
RA (arcsec)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1
203
204
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 8
INTEGRATED PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES
NAME CAL-ID RA DEC z log(M/M) log(SFR/M/yr)
IC5376 001 00:01:19.77 +34:31:32.52 0.0166 10.65 0.10 0.006 0.105
UGC00005 002 00:03:05.63 -01:54:49.67 0.0240 11.16 0.08 0.867 0.066
NGC7819 003 00:04:24.50 +31:28:19.20 0.0165 10.61 0.08 0.412 0.067
IC1528 005 00:05:05.37 -07:05:36.23 0.0125 10.54 0.11 0.197 0.064
UGC00036 007 00:05:13.87 +06:46:19.20 0.0208 11.06 0.09 0.186 0.134
NGC0001 008 00:07:15.86 +27:42:29.16 0.0149 10.82 0.10 0.649 0.063
NGC0036 010 00:11:22.29 +06:23:21.84 0.0197 11.22 0.10 0.535 0.096
MCG-02-02-030 013 00:30:07.31 -11:06:48.95 0.0115 10.68 0.10 -0.017 0.079

UGC00312 014 00:31:23.92 +08:28:00.11 0.0144 10.35 0.10 0.642 0.053
UGC00335NED02 017 00:33:57.31 +07:16:05.87 0.0179 10.82 0.09 -0.857 0.476
NGC0169 022 00:36:51.59 +23:59:27.59 0.0153 10.90 0.09 0.500 0.097
NGC0171 023 00:37:21.55 -19:56:03.12 0.0128 10.93 0.08 0.035 0.116
NGC0180 025 00:37:57.69 +08:38:06.71 0.0173 11.01 0.08 0.537 0.120
NGC0192 026 00:39:13.41 +00:51:51.11 0.0136 10.93 0.12 0.459 0.075
NGC0216 027 00:41:27.16 -21:02:40.91 0.0051 9.64 0.08 -0.502 0.059
NGC0237 030 00:43:27.83 -00:07:29. 0.0136 10.59 0.10 0.407 0.057
IC1652 037 01:14:56.28 +31:56:54.59 0.0155 10.60 0.09 -0.800 0.334
NGC0444 039 01:15:49.55 +31:04:50.16 0.0159 10.25 0.11 -0.176 0.088
UGC00809 040 01:15:51.83 +33:48:38.51 0.0138 9.99 0.12 -0.135 0.075
UGC00841 041 01:19:10.03 +33:01:50.15 0.0183 10.31 0.13 -0.027 0.093
NGC0477 042 01:21:20.47 +40:29:17.16 0.0195 10.89 0.11 0.492 0.084
IC1683 043 01:22:38.92 +34:26:13.56 0.0160 10.76 0.11 0.537 0.066
NGC0499 044 01:23:11.49 +33:27:36.72 0.0146 11.34 0.09 1.218 0.421
NGC0496 045 01:23:11.59 +33:31:45.47 0.0200 10.84 0.12 0.659 0.072
NGC0528 050 01:25:33.57 +33:40:17.03 0.0156 11.05 0.10 -0.157 0.328
UGC01057 053 01:28:53.25 +13:47:37.67 0.0210 10.63 0.12 0.373 0.069
NGC0774 072 01:59:34.72 +14:00:29.52 0.0151 11.02 0.10 -0.906 0.248
NGC0776 073 01:59:54.52 +23:38:39.48 0.0161 11.08 0.09 0.616 0.066
NGC0810 076 02:05:28.56 +13:15:05.75 0.0257 11.48 0.10 -0.436 0.395
NGC0825 077 02:08:32.32 +06:19:25.31 0.0110 10.63 0.10 -0.702 0.176
UGC01938 088 02:28:22.12 +23:12:52.56 0.0211 10.65 0.14 0.373 0.079
NGC1056 100 02:42:48.31 +28:34:27.12 0.0053 10.20 0.10 0.095 0.059
UGC02222 103 02:45:09.67 +32:59:22.91 0.0162 10.93 0.10 -0.722 0.419
UGC02229 104 02:45:27.57 +00:54:51. 0.0241 11.15 0.08 -0.179 0.274
UGC02403 115 02:55:57.26 +00:41:33.36 0.0137 10.59 0.11 0.510 0.072
NGC1349 127 03:31:27.50 +04:22:51.24 0.0218 11.33 0.09 0.078 0.270
NGC1542 131 04:17:14.18 +04:46:54.11 0.0123 10.55 0.10 -0.024 0.127
UGC03107 133 04:37:21.83 +09:32:40.92 0.0277 10.88 0.11 0.685 0.095
NGC1645 134 04:44:06.40 -05:27:56. 0.0159 11.03 0.09 -0.279 0.215
IC2095 141 04:48:45.88 -05:07:28.56 0.0091 9.00 0.14 -0.746 0.075
TABLE 8
INTEGRATED PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES. (CONTINUED)

UGC03253 146 05:19:41.87 +84:03:09.35 0.0136 10.63 0.10 0.231 0.106
NGC2253 147 06:43:41.83 +65:12:23.04 0.0118 10.80 0.10 0.495 0.061
UGC03539 148 06:48:53.99 +66:15:41.76 0.0107 9.83 0.12 -0.169 0.089
NGC2347 149 07:16:04.07 +64:42:40.67 0.0146 11.04 0.10 0.542 0.066
UGC03899 150 07:32:37.75 +35:36:52.19 0.0128 9.59 0.13 -0.238 0.072
NGC2410 151 07:35:02.25 +32:49:19.55 0.0153 11.03 0.09 0.549 0.112
UGC03969 153 07:41:14.35 +27:36:50.76 0.0269 10.73 0.10 0.551 0.084
UGC03995 155 07:44:09.11 +29:14:50.63 0.0157 11.15 0.08 0.247 0.138

NGC2449 156 07:47:20.30 +26:55:48.71 0.0161 11.07 0.09 0.037 0.168
UGC04132 165 07:59:13.05 +32:54:52.92 0.0172 10.93 0.11 0.959 0.069
UGC04722 231 09:00:24.12 +25:36:52.91 0.0059 8.81 0.12 -1.035 0.083
NGC2730 232 09:02:15.81 +16:50:17.88 0.0125 10.13 0.08 0.232 0.062
NGC2880 272 09:29:34.55 +62:29:26.16 0.0038 10.55 0.08 -2.275 0.655
IC2487 273 09:30:09.16 +20:05:26.88 0.0142 10.59 0.12 0.166 0.077
IC0540 274 09:30:10.34 +07:54:10.08 0.0068 9.83 0.12 -1.086 0.168
NGC2906 275 09:32:06.21 +08:26:30.48 0.0071 10.58 0.08 -0.095 0.060
NGC2916 277 09:34:57.59 +21:42:19.08 0.0121 10.96 0.08 0.348 0.074
UGC05108 278 09:35:26.27 +29:48:45.35 0.0267 11.10 0.11 0.662 0.120
UGC05358 306 09:58:47.13 +11:23:19.32 0.0098 9.56 0.12 -0.497 0.102
UGC05359 307 09:58:51.64 +19:12:53.99 0.0281 10.85 0.13 0.298 0.208
UGC05396 309 10:01:40.48 +10:45:23.03 0.0179 10.59 0.13 0.017 0.147
NGC3106 311 10:04:05.25 +31:11:07.80 0.0205 11.40 0.08 0.220 0.247
UGC05498NED01 314 10:12:03.64 +23:05:07.43 0.0209 10.76 0.10 -0.043 0.134
NGC3160 319 10:13:55.10 +38:50:34.44 0.0227 10.92 0.10 0.275 0.297
UGC05598 326 10:22:13.99 +20:35:21.84 0.0188 10.40 0.11 0.147 0.090
NGC3303 340 10:37:00.09 +18:08:09.23 0.0205 11.16 0.09 0.414 0.136
UGC05771 341 10:37:19.34 +43:35:15.36 0.0245 11.27 0.10 -0.304 0.241
NGC3381 353 10:48:24.81 +34:42:41.03 0.0055 9.88 0.09 -0.407 0.055
UGC06036 364 10:55:55.27 +36:51:41.39 0.0215 11.12 0.10 -0.073 0.234
IC0674 381 11:11:06.36 +43:37:58.80 0.0246 11.14 0.10 -0.024 0.165
NGC3614 388 11:18:21.33 +45:44:53.51 0.0076 10.31 0.10 -0.251 0.071
NGC3811 436 11:41:16.63 +47:41:26.88 0.0104 10.64 0.10 0.351 0.072
NGC3991 475 11:57:30.95 +32:20:13.20 0.0102 9.90 0.09 0.424 0.051
NGC3994 476 11:57:36.86 +32:16:39.35 0.0103 10.59 0.11 0.565 0.052
NGC4003 479 11:57:59.04 +23:07:29.64 0.0217 11.12 0.12 0.251 0.156
UGC07012 486 12:02:03.14 +29:50:52.79 0.0102 9.90 0.10 -0.102 0.060
NGC4149 502 12:10:32.85 +58:18:14.75 0.0101 10.45 0.10 -0.355 0.120
NGC4185 515 12:13:22.20 +28:30:39.59 0.0128 10.85 0.11 0.046 0.091
NGC4210 518 12:15:15.84 +65:59:07.07 0.0088 10.50 0.09 -0.205 0.073
IC0776 528 12:19:03.12 +08:51:22.31 0.0080 9.59 0.11 -0.482 0.071
206
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 8

NGC4470 548 12:29:37.77 +07:49:27.12 0.0076 10.23 0.09 -0.009 0.053
NGC4644 569 12:42:42.67 +55:08:43.79 0.0164 10.68 0.11 0.089 0.089
NGC4676A 577 12:46:10.10 +30:43:54.83 0.0222 10.85 0.10 0.524 0.087
NGC4874 592 12:59:35.71 +27:57:33.47 0.0242 11.66 0.08 -0.757 0.601
UGC08107 593 12:59:39.76 +53:20:28.32 0.0273 11.20 0.09 0.893 0.078
UGC08231 606 13:08:37.55 +54:04:27.83 0.0080 9.64 0.12 -0.395 0.060
UGC08234 607 13:08:46.51 +62:16:18.12 0.0270 11.39 0.10 -0.955 0.768
NGC5000 608 13:09:47.49 +28:54:24.84 0.0185 10.94 0.09 0.369 0.139

UGC08250 609 13:10:20.13 +32:28:59.51 0.0173 10.06 0.14 -0.169 0.105
UGC08267 610 13:11:11.32 +43:43:34.68 0.0241 10.77 0.13 0.477 0.148
NGC5205 630 13:30:03.57 +62:30:41.76 0.0057 9.98 0.09 -0.813 0.120
NGC5216 633 13:32:06.88 +62:42:02.51 0.0097 10.58 0.09 -1.239 0.238
UGC08733 657 13:48:38.99 +43:24:45.00 0.0076 9.61 0.11 -0.644 0.073
IC0944 663 13:51:30.86 +14:05:31.92 0.0230 11.25 0.10 0.413 0.150
UGC08778 664 13:52:06.67 +38:04:01.20 0.0106 10.29 0.11 -0.668 0.109
UGC08781 665 13:52:22.75 +21:32:21.84 0.0250 11.27 0.09 0.289 0.148
NGC5378 676 13:56:51.02 +37:47:49.91 0.0096 10.61 0.10 -0.617 0.270
NGC5394 680 13:58:33.19 +37:27:12.96 0.0113 10.38 0.10 0.528 0.056
NGC5406 684 14:00:20.11 +38:54:55.43 0.0178 11.26 0.08 0.437 0.082
NGC5485 708 14:07:11.35 +55:00:05.76 0.0062 10.74 0.08 -1.599 0.340
UGC09067 714 14:10:45.45 +15:12:33.84 0.0262 10.96 0.11 0.701 0.074
NGC5520 715 14:12:22.79 +50:20:54.23 0.0061 10.07 0.10 -0.066 0.054
NGC5614 740 14:24:07.58 +34:51:32.03 0.0127 11.22 0.08 0.200 0.110
NGC5630 749 14:27:36.60 +41:15:28.08 0.0088 9.96 0.09 0.048 0.053
NGC5682 758 14:34:44.97 +48:40:12.72 0.0075 9.58 0.10 -0.498 0.062
NGC5720 764 14:38:33.28 +50:48:54.71 0.0258 11.19 0.09 0.375 0.133
UGC09476 769 14:41:32.03 +44:30:46.07 0.0107 10.43 0.11 0.045 0.064
NGC5784 778 14:54:16.43 +42:33:28.43 0.0181 11.32 0.09 0.206 0.093
UGC09665 783 15:01:32.47 +48:19:10.91 0.0083 9.99 0.09 -0.106 0.065
NGC5888 789 15:13:07.36 +41:15:52.56 0.0289 11.47 0.10 0.396 0.121
NGC5908 791 15:16:43.20 +55:24:34.55 0.0109 10.95 0.09 0.363 0.080
NGC5930 795 15:26:07.94 +41:40:33.95 0.0086 10.60 0.10 0.407 0.061
UGC09873 797 15:29:50.64 +42:37:44.04 0.0185 10.20 0.10 0.104 0.088
UGC09892 798 15:32:51.93 +41:11:29.39 0.0188 10.48 0.10 -0.032 0.084
NGC5966 806 15:35:52.10 +39:46:08.04 0.0148 11.12 0.09 -0.752 0.376
IC4566 807 15:36:42.16 +43:32:21.47 0.0184 11.01 0.10 0.149 0.138
NGC5987 809 15:39:57.35 +58:04:46.20 0.0100 11.02 0.09 -0.233 0.273
NGC6004 813 15:50:22.72 +18:56:21.47 0.0127 10.86 0.08 0.209 0.070
NGC6020 815 15:57:08.13 +22:24:16.55 0.0144 11.04 0.10 -1.260 0.648
NGC6021 816 15:57:30.69 +15:57:21.59 0.0156 10.97 0.10 -0.543 0.352
TABLE 8

NGC6032 820 16:03:01.12 +20:57:21.23 0.0143 10.65 0.13 -0.056 0.230
UGC10205 822 16:06:40.17 +30:05:56.75 0.0216 11.08 0.10 0.381 0.198
NGC6063 823 16:07:12.98 +07:58:44.40 0.0094 10.36 0.11 -0.274 0.083
IC1199 824 16:10:34.34 +10:02:25. 0.0156 10.77 0.10 0.162 0.070
NGC6081 826 16:12:56.85 +09:52:01.56 0.0166 11.03 0.08 -0.326 0.282
UGC10331 828 16:17:21.12 +59:19:12.35 0.0150 10.26 0.10 0.537 0.054
NGC6125 829 16:19:11.54 +57:59:02.75 0.0157 11.35 0.09 -1.269 0.577
NGC6132 831 16:23:38.83 +11:47:10.32 0.0165 10.48 0.11 0.301 0.081

NGC6146 832 16:25:10.32 +40:53:34.43 0.0291 11.71 0.09 -0.102 0.337
NGC6154 833 16:25:30.48 +49:50:25.07 0.0198 11.14 0.10 0.144 0.115
UGC10380 834 16:25:49.91 +16:34:33.96 0.0291 10.92 0.10 0.678 0.216
NGC6150 835 16:25:49.96 +40:29:19.32 0.0289 11.42 0.10 -1.010 0.775
UGC10384 837 16:26:46.68 +11:34:49.07 0.0165 10.33 0.13 0.650 0.057
UGC10388 838 16:27:02.97 +16:22:55.92 0.0151 10.71 0.09 -0.537 0.403
NGC6173 840 16:29:44.87 +40:48:42.12 0.0291 11.81 0.09 0.287 0.577
NGC6168 841 16:31:20.83 +20:11:08.16 0.0083 9.93 0.10 -0.065 0.060
UGC10650 843 17:00:14.59 +23:06:22.68 0.0095 9.53 0.11 -0.246 0.076
UGC10693 845 17:04:53.01 +41:51:55.79 0.0275 11.61 0.08 1.652 0.556
UGC10695 846 17:05:05.56 +43:02:35.51 0.0275 11.38 0.09 -0.171 0.256
UGC10710 847 17:06:52.51 +43:07:19.91 0.0277 10.92 0.09 0.500 0.097
NGC6310 848 17:07:57.48 +60:59:24.72 0.0112 10.69 0.11 -0.356 0.108
NGC6314 850 17:12:38.71 +23:16:12.35 0.0219 11.20 0.09 0.001 0.279
NGC6338 851 17:15:22.96 +57:24:40.32 0.0270 11.67 0.09 -0.312 0.373
UGC10796 852 17:16:47.73 +61:55:12.35 0.0102 9.77 0.11 -0.504 0.092
UGC10811 854 17:18:43.72 +58:08:06.36 0.0284 11.06 0.09 0.240 0.156
IC1256 856 17:23:47.27 +26:29:11.39 0.0156 10.72 0.12 0.229 0.080
NGC6394 857 17:30:21.43 +59:38:23.63 0.0282 11.11 0.10 0.612 0.115
UGC10905 858 17:34:06.43 +25:20:38.40 0.0258 11.45 0.10 0.613 0.282
NGC6411 859 17:35:32.85 +60:48:48.24 0.0119 11.15 0.09 -1.212 0.470
NGC6427 860 17:43:38.59 +25:29:38. 0.0101 10.81 0.09 -1.305 0.434
UGC10972 861 17:46:21.91 +26:32:37.68 0.0153 10.65 0.10 0.171 0.204
NGC6478 862 17:48:37.75 +51:09:13.67 0.0223 11.26 0.10 0.999 0.072
NGC6497 863 17:51:17.97 +59:28:15.24 0.0201 11.34 0.09 0.289 0.130
NGC6515 864 17:57:25.20 +50:43:41.15 0.0226 11.37 0.09 -0.934 0.551
UGC11228 865 18:24:46.24 +41:29:33.71 0.0190 11.15 0.09 -0.387 0.369
UGC11262 866 18:30:35.68 +42:41:33.72 0.0183 10.33 0.10 -0.317 0.149
NGC6762 867 19:05:37.07 +63:56:02.76 0.0095 10.43 0.10 -1.275 0.314
MCG-02-51-004 868 20:15:39.86 -13:37:19.19 0.0187 10.92 0.11 0.578 0.078
NGC6941 869 20:36:23.47 -04:37:07.32 0.0206 11.21 0.10 0.471 0.104
NGC6978 871 20:52:35.42 -05:42:39. 0.0197 11.13 0.10 0.227 0.115
208
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 8

UGC11649 872 20:55:27.62 -01:13:30.72 0.0124 10.75 0.09 -0.349 0.148
NGC7025 874 21:07:47.32 +16:20:09.23 0.0162 11.50 0.09 0.065 0.293
UGC11717 877 21:18:35.42 +19:43:07.31 0.0209 11.16 0.09 0.764 0.166
MCG-01-54-016 878 21:25:59.97 -03:48:32.40 0.0095 9.43 0.12 -0.434 0.093
UGC11792 880 21:42:12.69 +05:36:55.44 0.0158 10.34 0.12 0.264 0.115
NGC7194 881 22:03:30.93 +12:38:12.48 0.0268 11.56 0.09 -0.462 0.636
UGC11958 883 22:14:46.87 +13:50:27.23 0.0259 11.32 0.08 -0.395 0.409
UGC11982 884 22:18:52.94 -01:03:31.31 0.0159 10.09 0.12 -0.276 0.136

UGC12054 885 22:29:32.44 +07:43:33.59 0.0067 9.33 0.11 -0.757 0.072
NGC7311 886 22:34:06.79 +05:34:13.07 0.0147 11.28 0.10 0.456 0.079
NGC7321 887 22:36:28.03 +21:37:18.48 0.0235 11.30 0.09 0.737 0.072
UGC12127 888 22:38:29.42 +35:19:46.92 0.0272 11.65 0.09 -0.370 0.574
UGC12185 890 22:47:25.05 +31:22:24.59 0.0218 10.99 0.08 0.064 0.148
UGC12224 891 22:52:38.37 +06:05:36.96 0.0116 10.41 0.11 -0.105 0.089
NGC7436B 893 22:57:57.55 +26:08:59.99 0.0244 11.55 0.09 -0.542 0.514
UGC12274 894 22:58:19.60 +26:03:42.84 0.0251 11.14 0.09 -0.201 0.353
UGC12308 895 23:01:18.69 +14:20:22.56 0.0072 9.49 0.13 -0.632 0.066
NGC7466 896 23:02:03.45 +27:03:09.36 0.0248 10.98 0.11 0.691 0.076
NGC7489 898 23:07:32.68 +22:59:53.16 0.0205 11.18 0.08 1.039 0.069
NGC7549 901 23:15:17.27 +19:02:30.47 0.0154 10.77 0.09 0.517 0.063
NGC7563 902 23:15:55.92 +13:11:45.95 0.0142 11.13 0.09 -1.416 0.644
NGC7562 903 23:15:57.50 +06:41:15. 0.0119 11.31 0.09 -1.144 0.507
NGC7591 904 23:18:16.24 +06:35:08.87 0.0162 10.95 0.10 0.910 0.066
UGC12519 909 23:20:02.75 +15:57:10.07 0.0145 10.48 0.12 0.340 0.060
UGC12518 910 23:20:12.74 +07:55:55.91 0.0126 10.36 0.09 -0.690 0.408
NGC7625 913 23:20:30.14 +17:13:32.16 0.0052 10.22 0.10 0.237 0.053
NGC7631 914 23:21:26.66 +08:13:03.35 0.0124 10.77 0.10 -0.000 0.082
NGC7653 915 23:24:49.36 +15:16:32.16 0.0139 10.82 0.08 0.464 0.062
NGC7671 916 23:27:19.34 +12:28:02.63 0.0125 11.03 0.10 -1.041 0.417
NGC7683 917 23:29:03.81 +11:26:42.71 0.0119 11.01 0.10 -0.733 0.394
UGC12688 922 23:35:26.08 +07:19:19.55 0.0173 10.34 0.11 0.352 0.065
NGC7716 924 23:36:31.43 +00:17:50. 0.0084 10.65 0.08 -0.171 0.083
NGC7738 927 23:44:02.06 +00:30:59.75 0.0224 11.21 0.10 1.179 0.086
UGC12816 930 23:51:50.68 +03:04:58.08 0.0174 10.34 0.12 0.211 0.110
NGC7783NED01 932 23:54:10.07 +00:22:58.44 0.0247 10.99 0.09 -0.375 0.384
UGC12864 935 23:57:23.92 +30:59:31.56 0.0155 10.38 0.11 0.056 0.079
MCG-01-01-012 936 23:59:10.80 -04:11:29.76 0.0189 10.68 0.09 0.340 0.256
NGC7800 937 23:59:36.74 +14:48:25.20 0.0056 9.67 0.11 -0.289 0.056
NGC5947 938 15:30:36.59 +42:43:01.56 0.0196 10.87 0.10 0.319 0.073
NGC4676B 939 12:46:11.23 +30:43:21.71 0.0217 10.95 0.10 0.596 0.093
TABLE 9
AVERAGE PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES
NAME log(age/yr) [Z/H] AVssp 12+log(O/H) Agas
V
IC5376 8.99 0.51 -0.35 0.16 0.56 1.02 8.50 0.05 1.24 0.03
UGC00005 8.97 0.42 -0.31 0.13 0.26 0.75 8.54 0.06 1.30 0.04
NGC7819 8.68 0.45 -0.29 0.11 0.10 0.53 8.47 0.07 0.90 0.08
IC1528 8.75 0.54 -0.34 0.14 0.22 0.74 8.47 0.08 0.77 0.03
UGC00036 9.42 0.26 -0.17 0.12 0.10 0.61 8.52 0.06 1.33 0.09
NGC0001 8.89 0.49 -0.35 0.13 0.51 0.89 8.55 0.06 1.59 0.06
NGC0036 9.30 0.42 -0.34 0.14 0.21 0.69 8.53 0.06 1.31 0.03
MCG-02-02-030 9.11 0.35 -0.33 0.14 0.11 0.10 8.53 0.06 0.88 0.04
UGC00312 8.44 0.45 -0.33 0.14 0.25 0.62 8.31 0.07 0.54 0.03
UGC00335NED02 9.43 0.42 -0.31 0.16 0.11 0.52 0.93 0.93
NGC0169 9.00 0.73 -0.26 0.15 0.79 1.52 8.53 0.06 1.73 0.11
NGC0171 9.18 0.29 -0.21 0.13 0.04 0.64 8.54 0.06 0.59 0.02
NGC0180 8.34 0.55 -0.24 0.16 0.78 0.38 8.56 0.06 0.75 0.04
NGC0192 9.39 0.30 -0.34 0.13 0.19 0.91 8.52 0.06 1.92 0.21
NGC0216 8.75 0.44 -0.28 0.16 0.08 0.43 8.37 0.06 0.40 0.02
NGC0237 8.79 0.26 -0.33 0.12 0.12 0.80 8.50 0.06 0.83 0.03
IC1652 8.19 0.48 -0.26 0.14 0.84 1.55
NGC0444 8.69 0.41 -0.30 0.12 0.17 0.86 8.40 0.06 0.53 0.02
UGC00809 8.77 0.52 -0.26 0.18 0.17 0.80 8.42 0.07 0.95 0.04
UGC00841 8.62 0.64 -0.30 0.14 0.38 0.72 8.48 0.07 1.04 0.05
NGC0477 8.89 0.39 -0.33 0.12 0.09 0.43 8.48 0.08 0.91 0.02
IC1683 9.31 0.37 -0.24 0.14 0.26 0.99 8.55 0.06 2.02 0.28
NGC0499 9.69 0.26 -0.17 0.19 0.09 0.59 8.52 0.08 6.48 3.34
NGC0496 8.74 0.34 -0.31 0.10 0.26 0.89 8.48 0.07 0.99 0.03
NGC0528 9.62 0.27 -0.21 0.16 0.02 0.33 2.70 1.60
UGC01057 8.38 0.55 -0.29 0.11 0.25 0.61 8.41 0.08 0.71 0.02
NGC0774 9.59 0.23 -0.20 0.13 0.06 0.49 8.51 0.06 0.32 0.32
NGC0776 9.26 0.28 -0.30 0.14 0.16 0.89 8.56 0.06 1.00 0.04
NGC0810 9.59 0.44 -0.21 0.16 0.11 0.73 0.73 0.73
NGC0825 9.34 0.36 -0.33 0.16 0.19 0.96 8.47 0.06 0.96 0.06
UGC01938 8.54 0.42 -0.26 0.11 0.29 0.80 8.42 0.07 0.89 0.03
NGC1056 8.96 0.40 -0.38 0.13 0.55 1.62 8.44 0.05 1.55 0.09
UGC02222 9.25 0.63 -0.22 0.13 0.13 0.58 0.99 0.59
UGC02229 9.44 0.39 -0.22 0.13 0.18 1.02 1.39 0.15
UGC02403 9.10 0.42 -0.33 0.14 0.41 1.32 8.54 0.05 2.31 0.28
NGC1349 9.20 0.55 -0.21 0.17 0.13 0.72 8.51 0.06 0.94 0.06
NGC1542 8.79 0.49 -0.22 0.16 0.49 0.98 8.51 0.06 1.80 0.10
UGC03107 8.73 0.48 -0.23 0.12 0.28 0.94 8.52 0.06 1.45 0.07
NGC1645 9.11 0.52 -0.19 0.14 0.08 0.42 8.51 0.06 0.47 0.02
IC2095 8.27 0.45 -0.24 0.13 0.27 0.72 8.27 0.10 0.37 0.04
210
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 9
AVERAGE PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES. (CONTINUED)

V
UGC03253 8.29 0.30 -0.26 0.10 1.19 1.68 8.50 0.07 1.12 0.05
NGC2253 8.80 0.37 -0.36 0.12 0.30 0.67 8.55 0.05 1.13 0.04
UGC03539 8.63 0.52 -0.28 0.14 0.74 1.35 8.45 0.07 1.30 0.06
NGC2347 8.64 0.54 -0.33 0.14 0.25 0.61 8.50 0.08 0.68 0.02
UGC03899 8.01 0.43 -0.26 0.13 0.25 0.57 8.27 0.08 0.55 0.04
NGC2410 9.20 0.29 -0.27 0.13 0.34 0.93 8.49 0.05 1.56 0.10
UGC03969 9.09 0.37 -0.22 0.16 0.58 1.63 8.50 0.05 1.64 0.08
UGC03995 9.29 0.45 -0.30 0.15 0.16 0.77 8.51 0.06 0.82 0.05
NGC2449 9.04 0.53 -0.21 0.14 0.49 1.12 8.56 0.06 0.94 0.05
UGC04132 8.86 0.33 -0.27 0.13 0.61 1.33 8.52 0.05 1.65 0.05
UGC04722 7.93 0.46 -0.26 0.12 0.26 0.47 8.26 0.10 0.33 0.02
NGC2730 7.81 0.34 -0.36 0.12 1.03 0.15 8.46 0.05 0.54 0.01
NGC2880 9.70 0.25 -0.25 0.16 -0.01 0.17
IC2487 8.86 0.57 -0.37 0.14 0.38 0.85 8.49 0.07 1.10 0.03
IC0540 9.14 0.59 -0.30 0.15 0.40 1.04 1.69 0.16
NGC2906 9.42 0.29 -0.31 0.16 0.12 0.69 8.57 0.05 0.81 0.02
NGC2916 8.94 0.39 -0.31 0.12 0.10 0.59 8.53 0.06 0.64 0.03
UGC05108 9.14 0.34 -0.18 0.11 0.14 0.62 8.50 0.06 1.95 0.26
UGC05358 8.63 0.32 -0.24 0.13 0.22 0.62 8.35 0.07 0.70 0.08
UGC05359 8.70 0.56 -0.24 0.12 0.33 0.84 8.47 0.09 1.01 0.04
UGC05396 9.00 0.29 -0.23 0.11 0.21 0.96 8.47 0.06 0.87 0.04
NGC3106 9.49 0.33 -0.23 0.15 0.12 0.68 8.51 0.05 1.08 0.03
UGC05498NED01 9.25 0.41 -0.22 0.14 0.41 1.07 8.49 0.08 1.21 0.06
NGC3160 9.20 0.48 -0.11 0.11 0.15 0.69 3.20 0.52
UGC05598 8.73 0.43 -0.32 0.12 0.45 0.95 8.46 0.06 1.12 0.05
NGC3303 9.54 0.20 -0.25 0.13 0.10 0.72 8.53 0.06 1.42 0.14
UGC05771 9.61 0.22 -0.24 0.15 0.08 0.45 8.50 0.06 0.52 0.22
NGC3381 8.81 0.27 -0.33 0.11 0.05 0.51 8.50 0.05 0.37 0.02
UGC06036 9.51 0.32 -0.12 0.15 0.19 0.74 8.52 0.05 1.68 0.09
IC0674 9.09 0.46 -0.25 0.14 0.25 0.74 8.47 0.07 0.58 0.02
NGC3614 9.22 0.26 -0.42 0.09 0.06 0.54 8.53 0.06 0.74 0.01
NGC3811 8.93 0.34 -0.35 0.11 0.13 0.65 8.52 0.05 0.94 0.04
NGC3991 8.31 0.46 -0.20 0.13 0.11 0.58 8.33 0.06 0.37 0.03
NGC3994 8.97 0.29 -0.29 0.15 0.19 0.81 8.49 0.05 0.99 0.06
NGC4003 9.59 0.16 -0.15 0.16 0.06 0.45 8.52 0.07 2.09 0.30
UGC07012 8.41 0.51 -0.26 0.11 0.13 0.46 8.38 0.08 0.41 0.02
NGC4149 9.15 0.60 -0.31 0.17 0.22 0.88 8.52 0.05 1.56 0.11
NGC4185 9.41 0.22 -0.28 0.11 0.03 0.49 8.53 0.06 0.87 0.01
NGC4210 9.09 0.30 -0.32 0.11 0.07 0.60 8.54 0.06 0.57 0.01
IC0776 8.34 0.54 -0.27 0.11 0.13 0.48 8.30 0.06 0.16 0.01
TABLE 9

V
NGC4470 9.01 0.29 -0.38 0.14 0.10 0.72 8.46 0.05 0.48 0.01
NGC4644 8.98 0.43 -0.13 0.13 0.16 0.74 8.55 0.06 1.14 0.14
NGC4676A 9.30 0.28 -0.20 0.13 0.26 1.40 8.50 0.05 1.42 0.10
NGC4874 9.83 0.14 -0.21 0.17 0.00 0.15
UGC08107 9.16 0.35 -0.26 0.15 0.34 1.27 8.47 0.05 1.51 0.08
UGC08231 8.12 0.36 -0.26 0.12 0.10 0.39 8.27 0.07 0.14 0.01
UGC08234 9.10 0.42 -0.17 0.13 0.15 0.61
NGC5000 9.08 0.36 -0.18 0.11 0.09 0.49 8.52 0.07 1.26 0.12
UGC08250 8.65 0.46 -0.29 0.13 0.59 1.23 8.41 0.07 0.78 0.04
UGC08267 9.15 0.38 -0.22 0.10 0.48 1.27 8.53 0.05 2.16 0.11
NGC5205 8.99 0.39 -0.33 0.13 0.08 0.40 8.52 0.06 0.74 0.02
NGC5216 9.56 0.20 -0.22 0.15 0.01 0.29 8.48 0.06 0.07 0.07
UGC08733 8.75 0.37 -0.27 0.12 0.09 0.67 8.37 0.08 0.26 0.01
IC0944 9.51 0.32 -0.24 0.11 0.25 1.05 8.51 0.06 1.96 0.07
UGC08778 9.26 0.40 -0.31 0.15 0.22 0.75 8.52 0.05 1.05 0.05
UGC08781 9.29 0.27 -0.19 0.12 0.05 0.44 8.52 0.06 1.01 0.03
NGC5378 9.48 0.27 -0.27 0.12 0.08 0.65 8.50 0.06 1.12 0.04
NGC5394 9.01 0.23 -0.24 0.13 0.16 1.00 8.56 0.05 1.97 0.24
NGC5406 9.33 0.28 -0.29 0.13 0.06 0.49 8.55 0.06 0.92 0.02
NGC5485 9.78 0.12 -0.20 0.14 0.01 0.45 8.53 0.07
UGC09067 8.86 0.24 -0.24 0.11 0.20 0.85 8.48 0.08 1.02 0.04
NGC5520 8.71 0.33 -0.33 0.13 0.16 0.65 8.48 0.06 0.84 0.04
NGC5614 9.61 0.16 -0.37 0.15 0.18 1.22 8.53 0.05 1.71 0.16
NGC5630 8.34 0.43 -0.29 0.13 0.19 0.61 8.34 0.05 0.46 0.02
NGC5682 8.55 0.54 -0.32 0.12 0.22 0.64 8.38 0.07 0.50 0.02
NGC5720 9.12 0.44 -0.32 0.14 0.18 0.45 8.51 0.07 1.04 0.02
UGC09476 9.02 0.22 -0.36 0.10 0.13 0.68 8.51 0.05 0.73 0.02
NGC5784 9.56 0.29 -0.29 0.14 0.09 0.59 8.54 0.06 1.15 0.05
UGC09665 8.85 0.41 -0.32 0.16 0.51 1.33 8.46 0.06 1.18 0.05
NGC5888 9.44 0.28 -0.22 0.14 0.11 0.59 8.56 0.06 0.92 0.03
NGC5908 9.63 0.24 -0.36 0.17 0.30 1.99 8.53 0.05 2.14 0.05
NGC5930 9.53 0.27 -0.33 0.13 0.07 1.01 8.49 0.06 1.71 0.21
UGC09873 8.58 0.57 -0.28 0.12 0.56 1.14 8.46 0.06 1.30 0.10
UGC09892 8.97 0.43 -0.35 0.13 0.29 0.90 8.48 0.06 0.99 0.03
NGC5966 9.70 0.15 -0.25 0.15 0.01 0.29 8.50 0.06 0.81 0.81
IC4566 9.30 0.34 -0.26 0.13 0.18 0.76 8.53 0.06 1.40 0.09
NGC5987 9.54 0.49 -0.24 0.14 0.37 1.58 8.49 0.07 2.32 0.62
NGC6004 9.29 0.21 -0.34 0.11 0.10 0.94 8.57 0.05 0.80 0.02
NGC6020 9.59 0.27 -0.26 0.14 0.12 0.66 0.77 0.36
NGC6021 9.51 0.22 -0.21 0.14 0.05 0.37 8.52 0.07 1.91 1.91
212
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 9

V
NGC6032 8.94 0.44 -0.20 0.13 0.15 0.72 8.49 0.08 1.07 0.16
UGC10205 9.14 0.42 -0.21 0.14 0.36 1.18 8.48 0.05 2.02 0.13
NGC6063 9.04 0.38 -0.38 0.14 0.10 0.58 8.48 0.07 0.62 0.01
IC1199 9.03 0.64 -0.28 0.16 0.25 0.67 8.56 0.06 0.99 0.05
NGC6081 9.53 0.29 -0.22 0.12 0.11 0.66 1.59 0.30
UGC10331 8.73 0.42 -0.38 0.14 0.45 0.88 8.39 0.05 0.93 0.06
NGC6125 9.78 0.21 -0.24 0.19 0.05 0.54
NGC6132 8.59 0.54 -0.30 0.14 0.27 0.69 8.43 0.08 0.76 0.02
NGC6146 9.59 0.19 -0.09 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.94 0.27
NGC6154 9.48 0.24 -0.28 0.15 0.05 0.46 8.51 0.06 1.00 0.03
UGC10380 8.71 0.66 -0.26 0.16 0.48 0.92 8.54 0.06 1.71 0.12
NGC6150 9.65 0.21 -0.15 0.15 0.05 0.37 0.62 0.62
UGC10384 8.52 0.47 -0.31 0.13 0.53 1.59 8.45 0.08 1.50 0.08
UGC10388 9.15 0.57 -0.19 0.17 0.17 0.66 8.48 0.08 1.34 0.15
NGC6173 9.81 0.16 -0.22 0.16 0.03 0.38 3.05 3.05
NGC6168 8.89 0.41 -0.34 0.16 0.34 1.21 8.41 0.05 1.08 0.05
UGC10650 8.22 0.55 -0.33 0.12 0.45 0.91 8.35 0.07 0.43 0.03
UGC10693 9.74 0.18 -0.28 0.15 0.04 0.68 7.64 7.39
UGC10695 9.57 0.32 -0.27 0.15 0.04 0.46 8.51 0.07 0.64 0.07
UGC10710 9.02 0.38 -0.23 0.21 0.67 1.10 8.48 0.06 1.25 0.05
NGC6310 9.39 0.39 -0.29 0.14 0.13 0.53 8.52 0.07 0.88 0.04
NGC6314 9.34 0.39 -0.31 0.16 0.20 1.07 8.50 0.07 2.02 0.36
NGC6338 9.72 0.30 -0.22 0.15 0.07 0.58
UGC10796 8.54 0.43 -0.23 0.11 0.15 0.55 8.38 0.07 0.39 0.02
UGC10811 8.41 0.39 -0.21 0.12 0.60 1.67 8.48 0.07 0.91 0.03
IC1256 9.08 0.36 -0.29 0.13 0.15 0.68 8.50 0.09 0.84 0.02
NGC6394 9.39 0.38 -0.31 0.15 0.20 1.07 8.54 0.05 1.53 0.09
UGC10905 9.53 0.30 -0.26 0.15 0.25 0.98 8.51 0.07 3.31 1.67
NGC6411 9.66 0.19 -0.21 0.14 0.00 0.13 8.49 0.08
NGC6427 9.51 0.40 -0.23 0.18 0.09 0.66 0.47 0.43
UGC10972 8.81 0.35 -0.24 0.14 0.50 1.03 8.46 0.07 0.74 0.02
NGC6478 8.57 0.31 -0.28 0.12 0.55 1.21 8.51 0.06 1.68 0.04
NGC6497 9.01 0.58 -0.21 0.13 0.28 0.71 8.55 0.06 0.74 0.02
NGC6515 9.44 0.41 -0.26 0.16 0.25 1.15
UGC11228 9.39 0.41 -0.19 0.14 0.31 0.90 8.51 0.07
UGC11262 8.82 0.51 -0.32 0.15 0.31 0.98 8.43 0.09 0.51 0.02
NGC6762 9.31 0.49 -0.29 0.14 0.18 0.67 8.49 0.07 0.33 0.22
MCG-02-51-004 8.42 0.42 -0.24 0.13 0.53 1.23 8.47 0.07 1.13 0.03
NGC6941 9.27 0.45 -0.28 0.12 0.16 0.80 8.54 0.06 1.06 0.02
NGC6978 9.19 0.47 -0.24 0.13 0.20 0.76 8.55 0.06 1.10 0.04
TABLE 9

V
UGC11649 9.22 0.39 -0.22 0.12 0.05 0.45 8.52 0.07 0.61 0.02
NGC7025 9.72 0.21 -0.27 0.19 0.14 1.28 8.51 0.07 1.21 0.10
UGC11717 8.63 0.87 -0.25 0.16 0.36 0.28 8.56 0.05 1.89 0.26
MCG-01-54-016 8.36 0.55 -0.26 0.15 0.25 0.66 8.31 0.11 0.50 0.03
UGC11792 8.38 0.53 -0.35 0.15 1.20 1.77 8.49 0.06 1.97 0.08
NGC7194 9.67 0.23 -0.13 0.14 0.03 0.39 1.40 0.88
UGC11958 9.63 0.41 -0.24 0.16 -0.01 1.13 0.57 0.33
UGC11982 8.75 0.42 -0.17 0.11 0.17 0.95 8.39 0.08 1.05 0.05
UGC12054 8.35 0.56 -0.29 0.14 0.32 0.74 8.33 0.07 0.52 0.02
NGC7311 9.22 0.39 -0.33 0.17 0.26 0.82 8.54 0.06 1.27 0.02
NGC7321 9.04 0.35 -0.32 0.13 0.13 0.61 8.51 0.07 0.85 0.02
UGC12127 9.71 0.28 -0.31 0.17 0.05 0.48 1.08 1.08
UGC12185 9.14 0.37 -0.25 0.13 0.13 0.62 8.47 0.07 1.01 0.03
UGC12224 8.83 0.34 -0.27 0.11 0.07 0.68 8.49 0.06 0.48 0.01
NGC7436B 9.57 0.29 -0.24 0.19 0.12 1.15
UGC12274 9.08 0.76 -0.23 0.13 0.07 0.40 1.19 0.27
UGC12308 8.24 0.45 -0.30 0.12 0.11 0.49 8.28 0.07 0.19 0.01
NGC7466 8.98 0.39 -0.31 0.12 0.36 1.05 8.51 0.05 1.40 0.08
NGC7489 8.03 0.49 -0.27 0.12 0.38 1.59 8.38 0.10 1.15 0.02
NGC7549 8.92 0.34 -0.28 0.16 0.41 1.03 8.53 0.06 1.12 0.06
NGC7563 9.74 0.21 -0.03 0.13 0.07 0.69
NGC7562 9.76 0.24 -0.15 0.14 0.04 0.48
NGC7591 8.99 0.32 -0.33 0.13 0.47 1.45 8.53 0.06 1.97 0.08
UGC12519 8.81 0.34 -0.33 0.15 0.31 0.96 8.47 0.06 0.93 0.04
UGC12518 9.26 0.53 -0.20 0.16 0.46 1.24 2.24 1.74
NGC7625 9.14 0.41 -0.41 0.12 0.41 1.81 8.55 0.05 1.58 0.08
NGC7631 9.10 0.46 -0.34 0.14 0.22 0.62 8.53 0.06 0.87 0.02
NGC7653 8.84 0.37 -0.40 0.10 0.19 0.88 8.52 0.07 0.79 0.02
NGC7671 9.40 0.58 -0.23 0.15 0.14 0.69 8.48 0.07 0.13 0.13
NGC7683 9.66 0.42 -0.21 0.17 0.18 0.50 1.88 1.46
UGC12688 8.44 0.51 -0.26 0.13 0.35 0.85 8.40 0.08 0.89 0.04
NGC7716 9.13 0.32 -0.37 0.15 0.09 0.67 8.48 0.05 0.61 0.01
NGC7738 9.37 0.37 -0.25 0.13 0.14 1.03 8.52 0.06 3.04 0.56
UGC12816 8.38 0.52 -0.23 0.10 0.17 0.65 8.38 0.08 0.67 0.02
NGC7783NED01 7.57 0.97 -0.13 0.19 0.18 0.12
UGC12864 8.77 0.28 -0.29 0.11 0.13 0.52 8.41 0.07 0.60 0.05
MCG-01-01-012 8.97 0.53 -0.23 0.17 1.27 2.04 2.91 0.25
NGC7800 8.49 0.40 -0.33 0.13 0.24 0.84 8.29 0.06 0.46 0.03
NGC5947 8.87 0.38 -0.26 0.10 0.03 0.27 8.49 0.07 0.52 0.02
NGC4676B 9.23 0.35 -0.25 0.12 0.16 0.63 8.49 0.05 1.36 0.09
214
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 10
PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES AT THE EFFECTIVE RADIUS.
V
IC5376 9.37 0.50 -0.44 0.13 0.48 0.11 8.53 0.04 1.34 0.21
UGC00005 9.18 0.28 -0.37 0.11 0.29 0.09 8.57 0.04 1.28 0.18
NGC7819 8.81 0.44 -0.28 0.14 0.06 0.06 8.47 0.07 0.82 0.17
IC1528 9.03 0.31 -0.41 0.14 0.19 0.10 8.51 0.04 0.77 0.14
UGC00036 9.56 0.44 -0.24 0.15 0.10 0.06 8.53 0.05 1.22 0.25
NGC0001 9.18 0.32 -0.46 0.12 0.49 0.10 8.58 0.05 1.19 0.17
NGC0036 9.33 0.44 -0.37 0.15 0.21 0.09 8.53 0.05 1.26 0.22
MCG-02-02-030 9.40 0.30 -0.37 0.12 0.07 0.05 8.56 0.03 0.91 0.13
UGC00312 8.54 0.36 -0.40 0.13 0.26 0.13 8.29 0.05 0.46 0.07
UGC00335NED02 9.42 0.36 -0.31 0.17 0.14 0.07 0.93 0.80
NGC0169 9.16 0.62 -0.26 0.17 0.73 0.24 8.53 0.06 1.62 0.19
NGC0171 9.22 0.23 -0.23 0.14 0.04 0.05 8.55 0.05 0.70 0.14
NGC0180 8.23 0.43 -0.24 0.18 0.80 0.13 8.56 0.06 0.90 0.17
NGC0192 9.49 0.47 -0.39 0.11 0.28 0.07 8.55 0.05 1.32 0.18
NGC0216 8.72 0.33 -0.42 0.13 0.12 0.08 8.35 0.04 0.42 0.06
NGC0237 8.85 0.25 -0.43 0.11 0.32 0.13 8.55 0.03 0.86 0.13
IC1652 7.87 0.66 -0.20 0.15 0.25 0.12
NGC0444 8.87 0.21 -0.35 0.16 0.12 0.07 8.40 0.04 0.57 0.11
UGC00809 8.98 0.25 -0.40 0.13 0.13 0.09 8.41 0.03 1.02 0.13
UGC00841 8.79 0.53 -0.25 0.20 0.41 0.11 8.49 0.08 0.98 0.16
NGC0477 8.90 0.32 -0.34 0.15 0.11 0.07 8.49 0.06 0.97 0.18
IC1683 9.47 0.61 -0.35 0.14 0.34 0.08 8.57 0.04 1.75 0.19
NGC0499 9.84 0.54 -0.24 0.17 0.13 0.06
NGC0496 8.86 0.39 -0.33 0.17 0.19 0.09 8.45 0.05 0.87 0.17
NGC0528 9.71 0.41 -0.01 0.10 0.00 0.01
UGC01057 8.79 0.27 -0.36 0.15 0.17 0.08 8.44 0.06 0.68 0.12
NGC0774 9.76 0.47 -0.26 0.12 0.02 0.02 8.54 0.02 0.71 0.28
NGC0776 9.29 0.38 -0.31 0.15 0.18 0.08 8.58 0.06 0.93 0.14
NGC0810 9.77 0.54 -0.27 0.15 0.05 0.04
NGC0825 9.57 0.41 -0.38 0.15 0.28 0.12 8.46 0.05 0.83 0.22
UGC01938 8.85 0.29 -0.32 0.14 0.33 0.08 8.45 0.05 0.78 0.13
NGC1056 9.08 0.39 -0.40 0.14 0.42 0.11 8.43 0.06 1.42 0.18
UGC02222 9.48 0.41 -0.24 0.14 0.07 0.09
UGC02229 9.67 0.33 -0.23 0.15 0.05 0.05 1.41 0.38
UGC02403 9.33 0.52 -0.41 0.12 0.51 0.11 8.55 0.04 1.41 0.19
NGC1349 9.56 0.49 -0.29 0.18 0.01 0.03 8.50 0.06 1.00 0.27
NGC1542 9.24 0.50 -0.35 0.15 0.51 0.15 8.51 0.06 1.75 0.22
UGC03107 8.85 0.35 -0.19 0.14 0.32 0.15 8.54 0.03 1.47 0.23
NGC1645 9.22 0.37 -0.23 0.14 0.09 0.10 8.51 0.06 0.59 0.28
IC2095 8.21 0.53 -0.28 0.19 0.11 0.09 8.31 0.10 0.66 0.17
TABLE 10
PROPERTIES OF THE CALIFA DR2 GALAXIES AT THE EFFECTIVE RADIUS. (CONTINUED)

V
UGC03253 8.34 0.41 -0.28 0.13 1.22 0.08 8.50 0.07 1.11 0.22
NGC2253 9.24 0.59 -0.38 0.10 0.30 0.06 8.59 0.03 1.23 0.12
UGC03539 8.09 0.56 -0.28 0.16 0.71 0.18 8.39 0.07 1.30 0.23
NGC2347 9.00 0.42 -0.45 0.10 0.32 0.08 8.56 0.04 0.62 0.11
UGC03899 8.21 0.43 -0.28 0.17 0.35 0.14 8.27 0.07 0.69 0.15
NGC2410 9.29 0.46 -0.29 0.14 0.41 0.08 8.51 0.04 1.32 0.21
UGC03969 9.10 0.42 -0.19 0.17 0.66 0.17 8.49 0.05 1.74 0.18
UGC03995 9.24 0.43 -0.28 0.16 0.15 0.09 8.51 0.05 0.86 0.16
NGC2449 9.11 0.61 -0.18 0.14 0.74 0.07 8.59 0.04 0.88 0.15
UGC04132 8.85 0.60 -0.28 0.14 0.76 0.10 8.54 0.03 1.63 0.16
UGC04722 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
NGC2730 7.74 0.30 -0.37 0.14 0.64 0.12 8.44 0.04 0.58 0.11
NGC2880 9.80 0.22 -0.35 0.13 0.01 0.02
IC2487 9.18 0.34 -0.48 0.10 0.41 0.06 8.51 0.04 1.10 0.17
IC0540 9.52 0.56 -0.45 0.10 0.45 0.09 1.26 0.28
NGC2906 9.22 0.33 -0.41 0.10 0.22 0.06 8.60 0.04 0.75 0.11
NGC2916 9.03 0.24 -0.36 0.11 0.04 0.04 8.55 0.05 0.71 0.13
UGC05108 9.16 0.40 -0.19 0.16 0.15 0.10 8.50 0.06 1.48 0.23
UGC05358 8.54 0.30 -0.24 0.16 0.33 0.08 8.35 0.06 0.77 0.18
UGC05359 8.74 0.55 -0.17 0.16 0.62 0.16 8.47 0.10 1.19 0.30
UGC05396 8.99 0.24 -0.26 0.11 0.19 0.10 8.45 0.05 0.94 0.17
NGC3106 9.46 0.68 -0.26 0.18 0.14 0.06 8.50 0.06 1.05 0.30
UGC05498NED01 9.35 0.29 -0.29 0.13 0.32 0.15 8.43 0.07 1.17 0.21
NGC3160 9.68 0.58 -0.04 0.11 0.06 0.05
UGC05598 9.00 0.30 -0.42 0.13 0.36 0.10 8.45 0.05 0.92 0.15
NGC3303 9.61 0.23 -0.28 0.15 0.11 0.08 8.52 0.05 1.22 0.18
UGC05771 9.77 0.54 -0.23 0.14 0.05 0.03 8.49 0.05 0.87 0.55
NGC3381 8.84 0.21 -0.39 0.10 0.06 0.05 8.52 0.03 0.38 0.06
UGC06036 9.36 0.87 -0.13 0.14 0.12 0.08
IC0674 9.37 0.24 -0.26 0.16 0.19 0.09 8.50 0.06 0.84 0.20
NGC3614 9.10 0.25 -0.40 0.13 0.04 0.04 8.49 0.05 0.81 0.14
NGC3811 8.96 0.26 -0.36 0.14 0.16 0.06 8.55 0.03 0.78 0.14
NGC3991 8.04 0.48 -0.23 0.16 0.23 0.13 8.28 0.02 0.46 0.07
NGC3994 8.90 0.32 -0.42 0.12 0.28 0.10 8.49 0.02 0.69 0.11
NGC4003 9.59 0.20 -0.06 0.16 0.08 0.08
UGC07012 8.54 0.38 -0.28 0.14 0.21 0.11 8.39 0.05 0.39 0.07
NGC4149 9.40 0.77 -0.32 0.12 0.61 0.11 8.52 0.03 1.79 0.14
NGC4185 9.44 0.43 -0.33 0.13 0.03 0.03 8.55 0.05 0.89 0.17
NGC4210 9.20 0.50 -0.34 0.12 0.01 0.01 8.57 0.04 0.60 0.12
IC0776 8.42 0.57 -0.26 0.17 0.23 0.16 8.31 0.06 0.28 0.12
216
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 10

V
NGC4470 8.94 0.26 -0.47 0.10 0.11 0.07 8.45 0.02 0.45 0.07
NGC4644 9.43 0.50 -0.22 0.11 0.12 0.08 8.58 0.04 0.97 0.13
NGC4676A 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
NGC4874 9.64 0.67 -0.23 0.19 1e-12. 3.19
UGC08107 9.18 0.33 -0.35 0.15 0.37 0.13 8.45 0.05 1.45 0.22
UGC08231 8.14 0.37 -0.32 0.14 0.11 0.08 8.23 0.05 0.18 0.04
UGC08234 9.37 0.17 -0.21 0.15 0.02 0.03
NGC5000 9.26 0.54 -0.21 0.16 0.11 0.05 8.55 0.05 1.15 0.22
UGC08250 8.85 0.29 -0.38 0.16 0.33 0.12 8.38 0.04 0.72 0.11
UGC08267 9.31 0.57 -0.22 0.13 0.71 0.08 8.55 0.04 1.84 0.24
NGC5205 9.22 0.17 -0.36 0.14 0.06 0.04 8.54 0.06 0.87 0.20
NGC5216 9.53 0.37 -0.22 0.18 0.01 0.03 8.43 0.05 0.07 0.96
UGC08733 8.80 0.29 -0.29 0.13 0.07 0.08 8.36 0.06 0.35 0.09
IC0944 9.61 0.31 -0.16 0.12 0.35 0.12 8.52 0.05 2.06 0.35
UGC08778 9.55 0.78 -0.40 0.11 0.22 0.06 8.54 0.03 1.25 0.20
UGC08781 9.28 0.52 -0.21 0.16 0.03 0.03 8.53 0.05 1.00 0.22
NGC5378 9.51 0.52 -0.26 0.15 0.10 0.06 8.50 0.06 1.23 0.24
NGC5394 8.96 0.23 -0.24 0.15 0.08 0.06 8.56 0.06 1.46 0.20
NGC5406 9.41 0.47 -0.32 0.12 0.09 0.04 8.59 0.05 0.96 0.15
NGC5485 9.76 0.23 -0.21 0.13 0.00 0.02
UGC09067 9.00 0.33 -0.33 0.15 0.27 0.11 8.53 0.04 0.85 0.12
NGC5520 8.84 0.23 -0.38 0.12 0.15 0.08 8.51 0.04 0.65 0.10
NGC5614 9.64 0.42 -0.43 0.11 0.20 0.08 8.54 0.06 1.36 0.24
NGC5630 8.52 0.34 -0.37 0.13 0.19 0.13 8.32 0.03 0.42 0.06
NGC5682 8.78 0.36 -0.39 0.12 0.22 0.11 8.34 0.03 0.50 0.07
NGC5720 9.33 0.36 -0.33 0.15 0.16 0.06 8.52 0.06 1.17 0.23
UGC09476 9.00 0.32 -0.41 0.15 0.11 0.06 8.52 0.03 0.69 0.10
NGC5784 9.73 0.51 -0.35 0.14 0.04 0.03
UGC09665 8.91 0.35 -0.39 0.12 0.78 0.09 8.46 0.03 1.33 0.11
NGC5888 9.52 0.40 -0.25 0.10 0.12 0.04 8.58 0.04 1.03 0.16
NGC5908 9.53 0.73 -0.27 0.15 0.71 0.15 8.53 0.04 1.85 0.22
NGC5930 9.61 0.16 -0.32 0.14 0.03 0.05 8.46 0.05 1.26 0.21
UGC09873 8.77 0.33 -0.36 0.09 0.56 0.12 8.45 0.04 1.04 0.16
UGC09892 9.17 0.22 -0.41 0.13 0.22 0.08 8.48 0.04 0.93 0.13
NGC5966 9.63 0.34 -0.24 0.14 0.00 0.01 8.50 0.04 0.81 0.88
IC4566 9.39 0.35 -0.29 0.15 0.19 0.08 8.55 0.06 1.40 0.20
NGC5987 9.73 0.46 -0.30 0.13 0.58 0.20 8.48 0.08 1.87 0.42
NGC6004 9.33 0.33 -0.36 0.11 0.07 0.04 8.57 0.05 0.78 0.14
NGC6020 9.63 0.63 -0.29 0.14 0.14 0.11
NGC6021 9.66 0.40 -0.22 0.17 0.01 0.02
TABLE 10

V
NGC6032 9.29 0.31 -0.15 0.20 0.15 0.11 8.51 0.07 1.17 0.17
UGC10205 9.43 0.34 -0.24 0.18 0.25 0.10 8.49 0.04 2.01 0.32
NGC6063 9.19 0.25 -0.42 0.14 0.08 0.08 8.49 0.05 0.66 0.13
IC1199 9.15 0.51 -0.28 0.17 0.32 0.15 8.53 0.06 0.95 0.15
NGC6081 9.72 0.60 -0.20 0.14 0.09 0.05
UGC10331 8.93 0.24 -0.48 0.10 0.38 0.08 8.38 0.03 0.91 0.08
NGC6125 9.67 0.23 -0.24 0.18 0.11 0.08
NGC6132 8.75 0.34 -0.40 0.14 0.27 0.13 8.43 0.04 0.70 0.13
NGC6146 9.69 0.63 -0.07 0.13 1.00 2.93
NGC6154 9.58 0.39 -0.31 0.13 0.04 0.02 8.55 0.05 1.04 0.19
UGC10380 8.61 0.56 -0.25 0.15 0.59 0.18 8.52 0.06 1.76 0.30
NGC6150 9.75 0.68 0.02 0.08 1e-12. 5.50
UGC10384 8.54 0.56 -0.33 0.14 0.76 0.15 8.50 0.04 1.30 0.19
UGC10388 9.66 0.33 -0.26 0.17 0.04 0.04 8.45 0.04 1.21 0.38
NGC6173 9.83 0.48 -0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05
NGC6168 8.82 0.31 -0.45 0.10 0.55 0.13 8.39 0.02 0.98 0.12
UGC10650 8.27 0.61 -0.28 0.16 0.62 0.23 8.36 0.05 0.50 0.10
UGC10693 9.79 0.27 -0.32 0.14 0.04 0.06
UGC10695 9.71 0.22 -0.30 0.17 0.04 0.06 8.44 0.08 0.70 0.70
UGC10710 9.04 0.39 -0.24 0.19 0.56 0.20 8.51 0.04 1.06 0.18
NGC6310 9.73 0.62 -0.32 0.10 0.17 0.04 8.56 0.04 1.08 0.17
NGC6314 9.54 0.49 -0.42 0.12 0.28 0.12 8.49 0.05 1.81 0.44
NGC6338 9.49 0.37 -0.25 0.19 0.16 0.09
UGC10796 8.62 0.43 -0.24 0.12 0.33 0.16 8.40 0.06 0.61 0.17
UGC10811 8.42 0.43 -0.21 0.14 0.60 0.16 8.49 0.07 1.14 0.28
IC1256 9.28 0.37 -0.35 0.13 0.18 0.09 8.56 0.06 0.85 0.16
NGC6394 9.50 0.22 -0.37 0.14 0.13 0.08 8.54 0.04 1.25 0.19
UGC10905 9.71 0.51 -0.31 0.16 0.22 0.09
NGC6411 9.73 0.19 -0.27 0.12 0.00 0.01 8.59 0.03 0.02 0.50
NGC6427 9.82 0.68 -0.13 0.14 0.00 0.01
UGC10972 8.93 0.28 -0.22 0.14 0.39 0.11 8.44 0.07 0.87 0.17
NGC6478 8.68 0.79 -0.36 0.13 0.70 0.09 8.56 0.04 1.67 0.22
NGC6497 8.86 0.67 -0.24 0.11 0.31 0.10 8.57 0.05 0.84 0.16
NGC6515 9.73 0.26 -0.29 0.18 0.00 0.01
UGC11228 9.71 0.67 -0.13 0.16 0.12 0.05
UGC11262 8.70 0.43 -0.28 0.19 0.32 0.15 8.41 0.08 0.62 0.16
NGC6762 9.75 0.46 -0.35 0.13 0.06 0.05
MCG-02-51-004 8.59 0.64 -0.25 0.12 0.59 0.08 8.48 0.05 1.08 0.17
NGC6941 9.52 0.18 -0.27 0.14 0.08 0.05 8.56 0.06 1.15 0.21
NGC6978 9.43 0.52 -0.30 0.13 0.28 0.07 8.57 0.05 1.10 0.23
218
SANCHEZ ET AL.
TABLE 10

V
UGC11649 9.43 0.20 -0.22 0.13 0.01 0.02 8.55 0.06 0.75 0.17
NGC7025 9.73 0.46 -0.33 0.16 0.17 0.11 8.50 0.05 1.21 0.37
UGC11717 8.28 0.69 -0.23 0.18 0.32 0.17 8.57 0.04 1.89 0.23
MCG-01-54-016 8.28 0.60 -0.29 0.17 0.60 0.22 8.28 0.11 0.62 0.12
UGC11792 8.52 0.48 -0.43 0.13 1.39 0.08 8.47 0.05 1.75 0.26
NGC7194 9.78 0.38 -0.13 0.15 0.00 0.01
UGC11958 9.59 0.41 -0.24 0.21 0.20 0.12 0.57 0.79
UGC11982 8.64 0.72 -0.20 0.16 0.15 0.09 8.38 0.07 1.12 0.25
UGC12054 8.66 0.52 -0.35 0.16 0.41 0.17 8.31 0.05 0.61 0.13
NGC7311 9.39 0.38 -0.36 0.13 0.33 0.10 8.58 0.04 1.27 0.15
NGC7321 9.24 0.30 -0.39 0.11 0.19 0.08 8.58 0.04 0.92 0.12
UGC12127 9.77 0.52 -0.33 0.16 0.05 0.04
UGC12185 9.38 0.41 -0.31 0.15 0.10 0.06 8.50 0.05 1.24 0.26
UGC12224 8.78 0.26 -0.30 0.17 0.08 0.07 8.48 0.05 0.57 0.13
NGC7436B 9.47 0.32 -0.29 0.18 0.23 0.16
UGC12274 9.73 0.69 -0.19 0.11 0.07 0.04 1.28 0.42
UGC12308 8.38 0.27 -0.33 0.14 0.10 0.08 8.28 0.06 0.29 0.09
NGC7466 9.15 0.34 -0.40 0.15 0.32 0.11 8.52 0.04 1.25 0.18
NGC7489 8.22 0.26 -0.31 0.11 0.41 0.10 8.39 0.05 1.20 0.22
NGC7549 8.91 0.31 -0.31 0.17 0.40 0.15 8.53 0.05 1.13 0.17
NGC7563 9.70 0.63 -0.04 0.15 0.09 0.05
NGC7562 9.88 0.55 -0.16 0.12 0.01 0.01
NGC7591 9.20 0.29 -0.41 0.11 0.53 0.12 8.55 0.05 1.68 0.22
UGC12519 8.96 0.41 -0.44 0.10 0.54 0.07 8.51 0.04 1.01 0.10
UGC12518 9.69 0.29 -0.24 0.16 0.63 0.13
NGC7625 9.19 0.39 -0.47 0.10 0.49 0.17 8.56 0.03 1.08 0.16
NGC7631 9.23 0.41 -0.39 0.12 0.21 0.08 8.54 0.06 0.90 0.16
NGC7653 9.07 0.24 -0.45 0.12 0.11 0.08 8.55 0.04 0.74 0.13
NGC7671 9.85 0.64 -0.17 0.14 0.00 0.01
NGC7683 9.94 0.70 -0.16 0.15 0.09 0.03
UGC12688 8.67 0.33 -0.27 0.14 0.45 0.18 8.48 0.03 1.18 0.13
NGC7716 9.27 0.28 -0.44 0.16 0.10 0.05 8.49 0.03 0.70 0.14
NGC7738 9.71 0.46 -0.19 0.14 0.10 0.05 8.56 0.05 1.72 0.35
UGC12816 8.44 0.52 -0.21 0.19 0.31 0.21 8.38 0.06 0.76 0.15
NGC7783NED01 7.88 0.80 -0.17 0.17 0.04 0.05
UGC12864 8.78 0.35 -0.27 0.14 0.15 0.07 8.43 0.08 0.63 0.11
MCG-01-01-012 9.05 0.48 -0.20 0.19 1.39 0.10 2.84 0.40
NGC7800 8.55 0.41 -0.39 0.15 0.34 0.16 8.29 0.04 0.47 0.07
NGC5947 9.12 0.35 -0.30 0.16 0.02 0.02 8.54 0.03 0.59 0.13
NGC4676B 9.21 0.33 -0.24 0.20 0.05 0.05 8.48 0.04 1.62 0.21
REFERENCES Gonzalez Delgado, R. M., Garca-Benito, R., Perez, E., et al.

Allen, J. T., Croom, S. M., Konstantopoulos, I. S., et al. 2015, 2015, ArXiv e-prints
MNRAS, 446, 1567 Gonzalez Delgado, R. M., Perez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., et al.
Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in SPIE Conf. 2014, A&A, 562, A47
Series, Vol. 7735 Gorgas, J., Faber, S. M., Burstein, D., Gonzalez, J. J., Courteau,
Bacon, R., Copin, Y., Monnet, G., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 23 S., & Prosser, C. 1993, ApJS, 86, 153
Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Martin, P. G., Corbin, M. R., Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ,
Cota, S. A., Peterson, B. M., & Slettebak, A. 1991, ApJ, 131, 2332
374, 580 Husemann, B., Jahnke, K., Sanchez, S. F., et al. 2013, A&A,
Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., Sanchez, S. F., Garca-Lorenzo, B., 549, A87
et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A45 Kehrig, C., Monreal-Ibero, A., Papaderos, P., et al. 2012, A&A,
Belfiore, F., Maiolino, R., Bundy, K., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 540, A11
867 Kelz, A., Verheijen, M. A. W., Roth, M. M., et al. 2006, PASP,
Bell, E. F. & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212 118, 129
Bershady, M. A., Verheijen, M. A. W., Swaters, R. A., Ander- Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541
sen, D. R., Westfall, K. B., & Martinsson, T. 2010, ApJ, Law, D. R., Yan, R., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 19
716, 198 Li, C., Wang, E., Lin, L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 125
Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, Marino, R. A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Sanchez, S. F., et al. 2013,
7 A&A, 559, A114
Burstein, D., Faber, S. M., Gaskell, C. M., & Krumm, N. 1984, Marmol-Queralto, E., Sanchez, S. F., Marino, R. A., et al. 2011,
ApJ, 287, 586 A&A, 534, A8
Burstein, D., Faber, S. M., & Gonzalez, J. J. 1986, AJ, 91, 1130 Martins, L. P., Gonzalez Delgado, R. M., Leitherer, C., Cervino,
Calzetti, D. 2001, PASP, 113, 1449 M., & Hauschildt, P. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 49
Cappellari, M. & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345 Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Tremonti, C. A., Dale,
Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Krajnovic, D., et al. 2010, ArXiv D. A., Smith, J.-D. T., & Calzetti, D. 2010, ApJS, 190, 233
e-prints Papaderos, P., Gomes, J. M., Vilchez, J. M., et al. 2013, ArXiv
Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Krajnovic, D., et al. 2011, e-prints
MNRAS, 413, 813 Papaderos, P., Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., Noeske, K. G., Fricke,
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, K. J., Guseva, N. G., & Green, R. F. 2002, A&A, 393, 461
245 Paturel, G., Petit, C., Prugniel, P., Theureau, G., Rousseau, J.,
Cardiel, N., Gorgas, J., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Cenarro, A. J., Brouty, M., Dubois, P., & Cambresy, L. 2003, A&A, 412,
Pedraz, S., Bruzual, G., & Klement, J. 2003, A&A, 409, 45
511 Perez, E., Cid Fernandes, R., Gonzalez Delgado, R. M., et al.
Catalan-Torrecilla, C., Gil de Paz, A., Castillo-Morales, A., et 2013, ApJ, 764, L1
al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints Poggianti, B. M. & Barbaro, G. 1997, A&A, 325, 1025
Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763 Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Daz, A. I., Kennicutt, R. C., & Sanchez,
Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718 S. F. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2439
Cid Fernandes, R., Gonzalez Delgado, R. M., Garca Benito, Roth, M. M., Kelz, A., Fechner, T., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 620
R., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A130
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
Cid Fernandes, R., Perez, E., Garca Benito, R., et al. 2013,
A&A, 557, A86 Samet, H. 1984, ACM Computing Surveys, 16, 187
Croom, S. M., Lawrence, J. S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2012, Sanchez, S. F. 2006a, AN, 327, 850
MNRAS, 421, 872 Sanchez, S. F. IAU Symposium, ed. , B. L.
Drory, N., MacDonald, N., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2015, AJ, ZieglerF. CombesH. Dannerbauer & M. Verdugo, 85
149, 77 92
Faber, S. M., Friel, E. D., Burstein, D., & Gaskell, C. M. 1985, Sanchez, S. F., Cardiel, N., Verheijen, M. A. W., Martn-
ApJS, 57, 711 Gordon, D., Vilchez, J. M., & Alves, J. 2007, A&A, 465,
Falcon-Barroso, J., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Vazdekis, A., Riccia- 207
rdelli, E., Cardiel, N., Cenarro, A. J., Gorgas, J., & Peletier, Sanchez, S. F., Galbany, L., Perez, E., et al. 2015a, A&A, 573,
R. F. 2011, A&A, 532, A95 A105
Forster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M. D., et al. Sanchez, S. F., Kennicutt, R. C., Gil de Paz, A., et al. 2012,
2006, ApJ, 645, 1062 A&A, 538, A8
Gallazzi, A., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., White, S. D. M., & Sanchez, S. F., Perez, E., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., et al. 2015,
Tremonti, C. A. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 41 ArXiv e-prints
Garca-Benito, R., Zibetti, S., Sanchez, S. F., et al. 2015, A&A, Sanchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Iglesias-Paramo, J., et al.
576, A135 2014, A&A, 563, A49
Garca-Lorenzo, B., Sanchez, S. F., Mediavilla, E., Gonzalez- Sanchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Jungwiert, B., et al. 2013,
Serrano, J. I., & Christensen, L. 2005, ApJ, 621, 146 A&A, 554, A58
220
SANCHEZ ET AL.
Sanchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Kennicutt, R. C., John- Vazdekis, A., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Falcon-Barroso, J., Ce-
son, B. D., Diaz, A. I., Pasquali, A., & Hao, C. N. 2011, narro, A. J., Beasley, M. A., Cardiel, N., Gorgas, J., &
MNRAS, 410, 313 Peletier, R. F. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639
Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Peletier, R. F., Jimenez-Vicente, J., et al. Walcher, C. J., Wisotzki, L., Bekeraite, S., et al. 2014, ArXiv
2006, MNRAS, 371, 703 e-prints
Smee, S. A., Gunn, J. E., Uomoto, A., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 32 Wilkinson, D. M., Maraston, C., Thomas, D., et al. 2015,
Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., & Gonzalez, J. J. 2000, MNRAS, 449, 328
AJ, 119, 1645 Worthey, G. 1994, ApJS, 95, 107
Vazdekis, A., Ricciardelli, E., Cenarro, A. J., Rivero-Gonzalez, Yan, R., Tremonti, C., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 8
J. G., Daz-Garca, L. A., & Falcon-Barroso, J. 2012, York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000, AJ,
MNRAS, 424, 157 120, 1579
V. Abril-Melgarejo, T. Bitsakis, M. Cano-Daz, J.J. Gonzalez, C. Lopez-Coba, S. F. Sanchez: Instituto de Astronoma,

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, A.P. 70-264, 04510, Mexico, D.F., Mexico (sfsanchez@astro.unam.mx).
Y. Ascasibar: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; Astro-UAM, UAM, Unidad Asociada CSIC.
J. Barrera-Ballesteros, H. J. Ibarra-Mede, D. Law: Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore,
MD 21218, USA.
L. Galbany: Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Chile.
L. Galbany: Departamento de Astronoma, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago,
Chile.
R. Garca-Benito, E. Perez, L. Sanchez-Menguiano: Instituto de Astrofsica de Andaluca (CSIC), Glorieta de la As-
tronoma s/n, Aptdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain.
A. Gil de Paz: Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO BOX 296, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia.
A. R. Lopez-Sanchez: Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias (IAC), 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
R. A. Marino: CEI Campus Moncloa, UCM-UPM, Departamento de Astrofsica y CC. de la Atmosfera, Facultad de CC.
Fsicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
D. Mast: Observatorio Astronomico, Laprida 854, X5000BGR, Cordoba, Argentina.
D. Mast: Consejo de Investigaciones Cientficas y Tecnicas de la Republica Argentina, Avda. Rivadavia 1917,
C1033AAJ, CABA, Argentina.
A. Roman-Lopes: Departamento de Fsica y Astronoma, Universidad de La Serena, Cisternas 1200, La Serena, Chile.

F.F. Rosales-Ortega: Instituto Nacional de Astrofsica, Optica y Electronica, Luis E. Erro 1, 72840 Tonantzintla, Puebla,
Mexico.
P. Sanchez-Blazquez: Departamento de Fsica Teorica, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Rmxaa..52-1 - Sfsanchezxiii - Pipe3d, A Pipeline To Analyze Integral Field Spectroscopy Data: II

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rmxaa..52-1 - Sfsanchezxiii - Pipe3d, A Pipeline To Analyze Integral Field Spectroscopy Data: II

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revista Mexicana de Astronoma y Astrofsica, 52, 171220 (2016)

PIPE3D, A PIPELINE TO ANALYZE INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY DATA: II.

S. F. Sanchez1 , E. Perez2 , P. Sanchez-Blazquez3 , R. Garca-Benito2 , H. J. Ibarra-Mede6 , J.J. Gonzalez1 ,

Presentamos P3D, un dataducto de analisis basado en el paquete de ajustes FIT3D,

Mexico, Mexico, D.F., Mexico. Madrid, Spain.

Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 10 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Chile.

intla, Puebla, Mexico. Chile.

1. INTRODUCTION the different analyses performed on the data to generate

V500 V1200 P-MaNGA

20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20

the current format of the MaNGA data). Note that this

4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 104

4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500

Paper I, 3 and 4. In particular, it is possible to appre-

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)

V500 V1200 P-MaNGA

stellar velocity (km/s)

stellar velocity (km/s)

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)

V500 V1200 P-MaNGA

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)

of spaxels/pixels: the data. It shows the distribution of spatial bins when a

becomes almost flat, as expected from the results pre- V500

vidual spaxels with a S/N below 3 the area required to

log(age/yr) [Z/H] log(*/Msun/arcsec2) log(M/L)

V500 V500 V500 V500

V1200 V1200 V1200 V1200

P-MaNGA P-MaNGA MaNGA P-MaNGA

20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)

et al. 2012). This library is an extension of MILES,

Radial distance (arcsec) Radial distance (arcsec)

V500 P-MaNGA V500 P-MaNGA

H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2)

H Flux (10-16 Erg/s/cm2)

20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20 20 0 -20

RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec) RA (arcsec)

[N ]6583, H, [S ]6717, and [S ]6731. Each of

As indicated before ( 3.4 and 3.4.3), for each cube

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

H vel. FWHM () Est.

TABLE 1 using the formula:

line fluxes are not corrected for internal extinction in the

... ... ...

DESC 8 Luminosity weighted metallicity of the stellar population in log(Z/Z ).

DESC 8 [N II]6548 emission line flux in 1016 erg s1 cm2 .

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

-0.5 0 0.5 -0.5 0 0.5

Ha [NII]6584 [NII]6548 HeI6678 [SII]6717 [SII]6731

[OIII]4363 [FeII] [FeII] HeI4471 [FeIII] HeII HeI4713 HeI4922 [OIII]5007

03.5481 04.4668 06.3096 07.9433 10.0000 12.5893 14.1254

00.5012 00.7079 00.8913 01.1220 01.2589 01.4125 01.9953 02.5119

00.0178 00.0199 00.0251 00.0316 00.0398 00.0562 00.0630 00.0631

sembly depending on galaxy properties (e.g. Perez et al.

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

log(age/yr) @Re [Z/H] @Re

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

AV gas mean (mag)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3