Professional Documents
Culture Documents
&RRSHUDWLYH6XEFDUULHU6HQVLQJ8VLQJ$QWHQQD
'LYHUVLW\%DVHG:HLJKWHG9LUWXDO6XE&OXVWHULQJ
Bushra Mughal1, Sajjad Hussain2, Abdul Ghafoor1
1
College of Signals, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan
2
School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK
LFDWLRQV 0.4
0.3
9 S08/$721R(68/76 0.2
1 Antenna
2 Antennas
4 Antennas
,QWKLVVHFWLRQUVWZHVKRZWKHHIIHFWRIDQ 0.1
8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6
tenna diversity on the SS performance then the SNR (dB)
0.5
P
0.5
P
0.5
P
0.7
majority data fusion rules. In this section re-
0.6
sults of MC with and without weights are pro-
d
0.5
P
vided and discussed.Here the results of and 0.4
of the MC of proposed scheme is compared 0.3 3 CRs2 antennaOR
3 CRs2 antennaAND
with the and of MC of conventional 0.2 3 CRs2 antennaMajority
3 CRs4 antennaOR
CBCSS scheme. 0.1 3 CRs4 antennaAND
3 CRs4 antennaMajority
0
5.3.1 Without weights 8 6 4 2
SNR (dB)
0 2 4 6
0.5
P
0.3
5.3.2 With weights 0.2
0.9
results are shown for both AND and Majority
0.8
data fusion rule. It can be seen from Figure 11 0.7
that AND data fusion rule is the best for mini- 0.6
0.5
0.9
ProposedOR
ProposedAND assigned to the decisions at the fusion center,
the sensing performance shall further be im-
ProposedMajority
0.8 ConventionalOR
ConventionalAND
0.7 ConventionalMajority proved.
(HFWRIYLUWXDOVXEFOXVWHUVVL]H
0.6
f
0.5
P
0.5
P
0.4
which in turns results better SS performance.
0.3 The third combination with 1 CR in VSC1, 3
0.2 CRs in both VSC2 and VSC3 outperforms the
0.1 UVWWZRFRPELQDWLRQVDVQXPEHURIPXOWLSOH
0
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 antenna CRs are increased further hence in-
SNR (dB)
creasing and reducing further. It should
be noted that the weight optimization can fur-
Fig.10(IIHFWRIZHLJKWVRQ3d of proposed schemes MC using OR and Majority ther improve the SS performance.
UXOHZ Z Z
9 C21&/8621
1
7KLVSDSHUIRFXVHVWKUHHVLJQLFDQWFKDUDFWHU
0.9
istics of CBCSS scheme which are subcarrier
0.8
energy detection of OFDM signals, antenna di-
0.7
versity based weighted virtual sub clustering,
0.6
and hard combining data fusion rules. From
d
0.5
P
0.4
above simulation results it can be concluded
0.3 [1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]OR
that proposed CBCSS scheme outperforms
0.2
[1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]OR
[1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]OR
the conventional CBCSS scheme. By virtually
0.1
[1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]AND
[1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]AND grouping the CRs with same number of anten-
[1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]AND
0
8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6
nas and assigning weights to the SS decisions
according to the number of antenna, can im-
SNR (dB)
References
0.7
0.6
d
0.5
P
uation and future directions. In Proceedings of
0.4
IEEE National Telesystems Conference, Washing-
0.3
ton, DC (USA), 15 - 23 (1992). [1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]OR
[1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]OR
[2] Mitola J, Maguire GQ. Cognitive Radio: Making 0.2 [1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]OR
[1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]AND
Software Radios More Personal. IEEE Personal 0.1 [1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]AND
[1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]AND
Communications, 6(4), 13 - 18 (1999). 0
8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6
[3] Cordeiro C, Challapali K, Birru D, Shankar N. SNR (dB)
,(((7KHUVWZRUOGZLGHZLUHOHVVVWDQ
dard based on cognitive radios. In Proceedings
of the 1st IEEE Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Fig.12(IIHFWRI96&VVL]HRQ3dRISURSRVHGVFKHPHV0&ZKHUH>D[EF@LVF
Spectrum Access Networks Conference, Balti- number of axb CRs)
more (USA), 328 - 337 (2005).
[4] Digham F, Alouini M, Simon M. On the energy
detection of unknown signals over fading chan-
nels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 5, 1
[1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]OR
3575 - 3579 (2003). 0.9 [1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]OR
[1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]OR
[5] Kostylev VI. Energy detection of a signal 0.8 [1x1(3) 2x2(1) 4x4(1)]AND
with random amplitude. In Proceedings of [1x1(1) 2x2(1) 4x4(3)]AND
[1x1(1) 2x2(3) 4x4(3)]AND
0.7
Communications IEEE International Conference,
0.6
1606 - 1610 (2002).
[6] Urkowitz H. Energy detection of unknown
f
0.5
P