Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title 3 3
Background and Motivation
Typical location of
surge arresters:
In substations
At the end of
transmission lines
At cable ends
At transformers,
generators, capacitors
etc
Location depending on
voltage level,
equipment and local
conditions
Title 5 5
The Surge Arrester Life
The normal destiny of the surge arrester is to be:
specified, purchased, installed
- and forgotten
Most common maintenance practice:
No testing of surge arresters
Only replacement after breakdown.
surge arresters are inexpensive
no big deal to replace!!!
Title 6 6
The Surge Arrester Life
Title 7 7
Surge Arrester
Service Experiences
Title 9 9
Failed Arrester
hanging with Bus Pipe
Title 10 10
Shattered Pieces of
Surge Arrester Stacks
Title 11 11
Damaged Surge Monitor and shattered Pieces of
Arrester stack
Title 12 12
Another failed Surge Arrester
Title 13 13
MoreFailure of Surge Arrester
Title 14 14
Surge Arrester Properties
Main objectives:
Protect important apparatus against
dangerous overvoltages
Low resistance during surges so that
overvoltages are limited
High resistance during normal operation, to
avoid negative effects on the power system
Sufficient energy absorption capability for
stable operation
Title 15 15
Equivalent Circuit Diagrams
Series
spark gap
and RC
control MO
discharge
resistor
SiC discharge
resistor
Title 16 16
Voltage Current Characteristics
MOSA (ZnO) and SiC Arresters
Title 17 17
Thermal Instability
Title 18 18
Total Power Dissipation Accumulated of
Sequence of Incidents in the Network
Title 20 20
The choice of MOSA is always a compromise
The choice of MOSA is a compromise between protection
level, voltage withstand and energy absorption
Title 21 21
Design of Porchelain-MOSA
eks. Cooper Power Systems
Title 22 22
Design of Polymeric-MOSA (ABB)
Title 23 23
Ageing of MOSA
Normal operating voltage causes ageing
Pollution and overvoltage surges can cause ageing
from overloading of all or some of the blocks
Moisture entry through sealing gaskets, may lead to
shorting of ZnO discs and overstressing of healthy
ZnO blocks.
Degree of ageing depends on the nature/ quality of
the granular layer.
Increase in resistive leakage current may bring the
arrester to thermal instability and complete
arrester breakdown.
Title 24 24
Metal Oxide Surge Arresters
- Causes for Failure
Incorrect arrester specification corresponding to
actual system voltage and overvoltage stress
Overloading due to:
Temporary overvoltages (cracking, puncturing).
Switching overvoltages (cracking, puncturing,
flashover).
Lightning overvoltages (change of
characteristic/ageing, flashover, puncturing).
External pollution or moisture penetration .
Consequence of aging: Increase in the continuous resistive
leakage current .
Title 25 25
Consequences of Arrester Failures
Title 26 26
Reasons for Transformer Failures
Title 27 27
YES -Transformers Do Fail
Title 28 28
YES -Transformers Do Fail
Title 29 29
Possibilities for Surge Arrester
Condition Assessment
Title 30 30
Why Condition Assessment of
Surge Arresters?
Title 31 31
IEC 60099-5 Part 5:
Selection and Application Recommendation
Title 32 32
Methods for Monitoring of degradation of MOSA
Visual inspection
Locating external abnormalities on the arrester and gives
practically no information about the internal of the arrester
Surge counters
Frequently installed on MOSA, but has no practical use for
diagnosis of condition of the arresters
Temperature measurements Thermo Vision
Frequently used method. Detects the increased block
temperature on the housing surface of the arrester.
Leakage current measurements
Most used diagnostic method. For in-service testing, the
method with indirect determination of the resistive leakage
current with compensation for harmonics in the voltage
(THRC) is providing the best available information quality
with respect to diagnostic efficiency.
Title 33 33
Conventional Surge Counters
Title 34 34
Modern Surge Counter
ABB EXCOUNT II
Mod. Mod.
1 2
SURGE COUNTING:
- Number
- Time stamp
- Current amplitude classif.
CONDITION MONITORING:
- Total leakage current
- Resistive leakage current
(Method B2 - IEC 60099-5)
Title 35 35
Monitoring Spark Gaps, from TriDelta
Title 36 36
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
It
Ic: Ir:
0.2-3 mA 10-600A
U
Title 37 37
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
It
Ic: Ir:
0.2-3 10-600A
mA U
Ic = 100 Ic = 100
It = 100,5 It = 104,5
Ir = 10 Ir = 30
Title 38 38
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
Title 39 39
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurement
Title 41 41
Typical Voltage - Current
Characteristics
Title 42 42
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
Method B1: 3rd harmonic analysis of leakage current:
IEC 60099-5 says: Error range for third harmonic leakage
current without compensation for different phase angles of
system voltage third harmonics:
Includes various
voltage-current
characteristics of no
linear metal-oxide
120
resistors.
1% third harmonic in
voltage may give
100% measurement
error.
270
(Norway: 0,1 0,9%
harm.)
Title 43 43
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
Method B2: Harmonic analysis of leakage current
using third harmonic with compensation:
3rd harmonic analysis chosen is used as a basis to obtain
feasibility/reliability measurements in three-phase applications on-
site.
Presences of harmonics in the operating voltage generate harmonic
capacitive leakage currents that is indirectly measured and
compensated for.
The key for compensation is application of field probe for indirect
measurement of the 3rd harmonic capacitive leakage current
generated by the operating voltage.
The total and true resistive leakage current Ir is calculated from I3r
and arrester data (incl. correction for temperature and voltage).
Title 44 44
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
A HV-DC test is
effective but off
line and complex
Method B2 is
ranked to be the
best field method
for evaluation of
ageing and
deterioration of
MOSA.
Title 46 46
IEC 60099-5:
Summary of Performance
Available diagnostic methods:
Measurement of total leakage current.
Poor sensitivity. Insufficient method.
Direct measurement of resistive leakage current.
Attractive, but not usable on site.
Method B1: 3rd harmonic analysis of the leakage
current.
High sensitivity to harmonics in the voltage.
Title 47 47
Deployment of LCM 500 accessories
1
1. Gapless MOSA
2. Insulated base
3. Grounding wire
The Field Probe should
NEVER exceed this limit 4. Clip-on CT500 it(t)
2
5. Counter
3 6. Field probe ip(t)
4 7. Arrester pedestal
5 8 9
7
6 8. Telescopic rod
9. LCM 500 unit
Title www.doble.no 48 48
Performance of testing
TOGETHER WE POWER THE WORLD
CCT should be
placed above any
counter/a-meters
FP should be placed
as close as possible
to the base of the
arresters
Title 49
www.doble.com
Leakage Current Measurements
Requirements: Separate earth lead & insulated base for each arrester.
Short circuit of
insulated base
Electromagnetic will lead to
field can circulating
introduce current currents in the
in this loop. fundament and
the earth lead.
CCT
CCT
Title 50 50
Risk Assessment
Based on the level and development of resistive leakage
current Ir over time:
1. Trend analysis over time
In general look for increasing trend
Baseline reading when the arrester is new. If Ir
increases by 300-400%, this confirms severe ageing
2. Compare to maximum recommended values from
arrester manufacturers
3. Compare Ir for arresters of the same make and type:
The three phases in a line or bay
All arresters in the grid
4. Combination of step 1-3
Title 51 51
Risk Assessment
Steps in the final evaluation:
1. It and Ir are unrealistically high: Circulating
currents? Check the insulated base and arrester
grounding.
2. Ir higher than expected: Temporary heating?
Consider to re-test in approx. 1 day to confirm
measured value.
3. Confirmed high reading of Ir: Monitor
continuously or proceed with step 4.
4. Contact arrester manufacturer and consider
replacement.
Title 52 52
Testing Strategy
1. Classify all your MOSAs (name of substation, bay/line and
phase, nameplate data (manufacturer, type designation,
year/date of commissioning etc.), historical data/failure
rates, importance etc.).
2. Establish threshold levels/maximum recommended levels
for the resistive leakage current for each arrester type.
3. Define action limits (good condition, satisfactory, re-
test/monitor continuously, replace).
4. Define measurement regularity (normal, frequent,
monitor continuously, after special fault situations).
5. Define verification actions after replacement (laboratory
test, dissection/inspection).
6. Evaluate measurements, action limits, regularity of
measurements and verification tests to possibly improve the
testing strategy.
Title 53 53
Case studies
Title 54 54
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (1/3)
Title 55 55
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (2/3)
420 kV MOSA at transmission utility
Type A: 100% ~ 165 A Type B: 100% ~ 165 uA
120
Resistive leakage current in percent
120
80 Bay 1 80
Bay 2 Bay 7
60 60
Bay 3 Bay 8
40 Bay 4 40
20 20
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6
Arrester number
Type
3000
C: 100% ~ 675 uA Arrester number
Resistive leakage current (uA)
2500
2000
Bay 5
1500
Bay 6
1000
500
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Arrester number
Title 56 56
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (3/3)
Measurements showed:
1 arrester of type C with app. 375% of max. recommended value
1 arrester of type A with app. 90% of max. Recommended value
The rest of the arresters had values from 70% and lower.
Title 57 57
Measurement at a Petro-Chemical factory (1/1)
Title 58 58
Measurement at a Oil Refinery (1/1)
Title 59 59
Utility performing routine tests annually (1/2)
Case 4: Annually routine testing with LCM for all
arresters in the grid
Condition monitoring to avoid:
Sudden failures
blasting of arresters
outages
Philosophy:
Use a simple test to detect bad arresters in service- no outage
necessary!
Have set max resistive leakage current to 500A
Verification of LCM measurements in laboratory (capacitance, tan,
IR and dissection)
Cooperate with arrester manufacturer to improve arrester design
based on measurement experience
Title 60 60
Utility performing routine tests annually (2/2)
Title 61 61
Measurements at 110 kV Transm.line (1/2)
Title 62 62
Measurements at 110 kV Transm.line (2/2)
Conclusions:
3 arresters have been removed based on leakage current
measurements so far
All three showed high leakage currents of respectively 293A, 570A
and 7070 A!!!
Remaining arresters of same make showed low and normal values
(<80A)
Standard analog meters in the field were not showing readings in the
alarm region
Title 63 63
Measurements at a City Substation (1/1)
Case 6: 18 arresters, 300 kV, majority installed in 1980
The utility was concerned due to arrester failures
(arrester explosions) in the past
Measurements showed:
3 units with close to 300% (Ir max rec.=130A=100%)
4 units in the area app. 70-100%
The rest showed low/normal values <50%
Conclusion/our recommendations:
Replace 3 arresters
Monitor 4 arresters closely
Measure the rest again in app. 1-2 years
Title 64 64
Measurements at 420 kV System (1/1)
Measurements showed:
All arresters had Ir values between 37-55%
Title 65 65
Measurements at Coastal Site (1/1)
Measurements gave:
All arresters had Ir values between 35-46%
Title 66 66
Measurements at 110 kV Substation (1/2)
Measurements gave:
Two arresters had significantly higher readings (230% and 400%
respectively
Title 67 67
Measurements at 110 kV Substation (2/2)
Title 68 68
Summary
Surge arresters protect valuable assets from overvoltages
generated by lightning strikes or switching operations.
This method is easy and efficient for field application for any
make of metal oxide surge arresters.
Title 69 69
QUESTIONS?
Title 70 70