You are on page 1of 6

ANNEX 3-1

PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual


Module 5 of SMR

ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC.


PROPONENT’S NAME

MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: JANUARY – JUNE 2010

I. BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION AND UPDATES

ECC Control No/REFERENCE Code No: ECC-4A-2001-562-112


Project Title: ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC.
Project Type: Manufacturing of Plastic Injected Parts
Location: PEZA-Cavite Economic Zone Rosario, Cavite
Project Coordinates: __________________________
Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) Operational
Contact Person: Mr. Katsuhiko Sasaki
EMP Approval:  During ECC Application Stage
 Updated after ECC Issuance; approved on _________n/a_________
Changes in Project Design (if any): _________________________________________
____________________________N/A_______________________________________

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Table II-1. Summary of Major Findings for the Monitoring Period

Condition / Requirement / Compliance Recommendation/Co


Commitment Status & mmitment for the
Summary of next reporting
Actions taken
Compliance with ECC Complied Continuous monitoring.

Compliance with EMP Complied Continuous monitoring


Implementation of appropriate & None There is no exceedance.
effective env’tal impact remedial
actions in case of exceedances
Complaints Management None There was no Complaint.
Realistic and sufficient budget for Complied
conducting the environmental
monitoring and audit activities
Accountability - qualified Accredited PCO Reporting
personnel are charged with the and attended
routine monitoring of the project training for EMS
activities in terms of education, concerns.
training, knowledge and
experience of the environmental
team
Others . . . -

There were no major activities that affect and influenced the monitoring
parameters during the monitoring period. Since the Standby Generator Set (450
kVA-capacity) was categorized as small source, it will be tested every other year
with 3 sampling runs for air quality. Ambient quality will be tested every year.
Test sampling was done last October 22, 2009. The next sampling will be
after two years for air quality as stated on DENR Implementation of the
Memorandum Circular No. 2007-003 otherwise known as the Policy on
Compliance and Permitting for Industrial Facilities Relating to Air Quality under
page 2: For small source(s) it should be tested once on the first year of its

1
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual
Module 5 of SMR

operation to verify its compliance. Thereafter, it should be tested once every


other/second year. Each test shall consist of three sampling runs.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

A. Compliance Monitoring

Table 1. Summary Status of ECC & EMP Compliance


ECC/EMP Relevant ECC Condition/s Status of
Condition/Requirement (if any) Complianc REMARKS
Categorization #/s Requirement e ( if
Description complying)
The production
Production
capacity Shall not
Capacity for:
exceed Ten Million
1st quarter =
1(opera (10,000,000) pcs.
630,496
1) Project coverage/limits/ tional Of Plastic Parts for 
2nd quarter =
phase) electronic and
471,651
telecommunication
3rd Quarter =
products per
4th Quarter =
annum
2(Pre- Expiration of
Injection Machine;
operatio Permit-To-
2) Components Generator Set 
nal Operate: Aug. 27,
(standby)
phase) 2010
1(Pre- Licensing & All clearances:
3) Other sectoral requirements
operatio Permits: Annually, Licensing and
mandated by other agencies 
nal submitted to PEZA- Permits has been
to be complied with
phase) EHSD secured
ECC
4) EMP and updates as deemed Monitored and Continuous
conditio 
required complying monitoring
n
Settings of baseline
5) Conduct of baseline,
are integrated to Continuous
compliance and impact self- N/A 
the EMS based monitoring
monitoring
reports.
6) Multi-sectoral Monitoring (as MOA signed and Continuous
N/A 
may be required) MMT formed monitoring
Submission of
SMR/CMR for
1(Pre-
approval and
operatio
7) Regular reporting SMR/CMR  evaluation for the
nal
period of Apr-Jun
phase)
2010 / Feb-Jun
2010
ISO Certified by
8) Institutional arrangements
Certification
necessary for Integrated Quality
International (a
implementation of N/A  management
third party
environmental management System
auditor): EMS
measures
14001 & QMS 9001
Written notification
2(Set on
within 15 days There is NO
9) Standard DENR requirement ECC
from such transfer  transfer of
on transfer of ownership Conditio
to the DENR-R4A ownership
n)
office
10) Standard DENR requirement
N/A None N/A
on abandonment
Aspects and
CM
Maintenance & Impacts are
11) Impact Mitigation Plan or Table
Monitoring of the monitored and
Construction/ Contractor’s #2 (ECC 
Mitigation Plan and under the EMS
Environmental Program conditio
its Implementation based program of
n)
the proponent
12) Social Development Plan
N/A None N/A
(SDP)
13) IEC Plan N/A None N/A
2
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual
Module 5 of SMR

With established
Emergency
14) Contingency/Emergency Documents and
Response Team
Response Plan or equivalent  records are well
and its
Risk Management Plan secured.
Implementing
guidelines.
15) Abandonment Plan (when
N/A None N/A
applicable)
Summarized EMP
on
Complied with the
Air Quality, Water
16) Environmental Monitoring monitoring report;
- Quality, Toxic & 
Plan (EMoP) Test Samplings
Hazardous Waste
and Results.
and Solid waste
management.
17) (Others) - - - -

For the Submission for the Reporting of CMR of the proponent for the
period of January – June 2010, and all the condition on the ECC was complied.

B. Impact Monitoring

Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring


Plan Implementation
Remark
Stan
Envt’l s
dard
Mgmt. (EQPL*
Monitori Monito Sampling & Measurement / EIS
Mea- commit
ng Envt’l Envt’l ring Predi
sure ment, if
Objectiv Aspect Impact Param ction
any)
e eter
Results
Stn/
Previo Curre
Locn
us nt
CO=10 CO=5
6.50 00mg/
To Air Emission Air SOx, CO=286. Ncm
determi of standby Pollution NOx, 30 SO2=20 NO
ne Air power TSP, Guard .84 SO2= EQPLs.
SO2=128 1500
Quality generator CO House/ .26 NO2=7 mg/Nc Continu
Parkin 4.63 m ous
g Area NO2=925 monitori
.02 NO2=
2000 ng
mg/Nc
m
Continu
Delivery and Compa Emissio ous
To business Air TSP, ny n Test monitori
determi truck/vehicle pollution SOx, Truck Conduct ng
ne Air that NOx, ion
Quality produces/gene Before
rates Air Compa registrat
Emissions and ny ion.
Dust Vehicle Checkin
g and
monitori
ng of
Vehicles
function
.

3
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual
Module 5 of SMR

Comply Plant Health Numbe Provisio Continu


with RA Operation hazards r of Inside n of ous
6969 accide the Protecti monitori
Soil and nts plant ve and ng
water and oil site safety
pollution spills devices/
Storag equipm
e ent
facilitie
s Proper
of storage
hazard of
ous hazardo
waste us
waste

Treatme
nt of
hazardo
us
waste

To Plant Health Vol. of Implem Continu


manage operation hazards solid Inside entation ous
solid may result to waste the of solid monitori
waste solid waste Soil and genera plant waste ng
generat generation water ted site manage
ed pollution recycle ment
d, progra
reuse m
and
properl
y
dispos
ed
To Compan
conserv Use of Depletion N/A y wide Continu
e electricity for of campai ous
natural lighting, air natural gn for monitori
resourc conditioning, Resource energy ng
es & other office s conserv
equipment. ation
and
awaren
ess
Working Ambient Health Total Inside 18 26 Continu
Environ condition hazards suspen the μg/Nc μg/Nc ous
mental ded plant m m monitori
Measure particu site ng
ment late,
μg/Nc Outsid 25 13
m e the μg/Nc μg/Nc
plant m m
site
Working Generation of Inside 64.21 90d Continu
Environ noise due to Noise Decibe the dB B in ous
mental operation of pollution l plant 8hrs monitori
Measure machine site of ng
ment 55.34 expo
Outsid dB sure
e the
plant
site

*EQPL-Environmental Quality Performance Level


o Alert or Red Flag - early warning

o Action Level-point where management measures must be employed so as not to reach the
regulated threshold or limit level, or to reduce deterioration of affected environmental
component to pre-impact or optimum environmental quality
o Limit Level-regulated threshold of pollutant (standard that must not be exceeded); point
where emergency response measures must be employed to reduce pollutants to lower than
standard limit.

4
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual
Module 5 of SMR

o NOTE: Section on EQPLs may be filled out as a Proponent’s draft commitment or after these
have been established and mutually agreed upon among Proponent, EMB and other MMT
members. Otherwise, only the LIMIT Level shall be the reference for regulatory compliance.
This means that environmental management measures are formulated at the “ACTION level”
so as not to exceed this regulated threshold.

Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses

Budget Actual Expenses


Expense Item* Direct from Budget for Direct Co. MMT
Co. MMT Expense expenses
A. Implementation of Management Plans & Programs
1) Environmental Impact
√ N/A √ N/A
Mitigation Plan
2) Social Development Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A
3) IEC Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A
4) Enhancement Programs Re-used Re-used
N/A N/A
(if any) materials materials
B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans
1) Self-Monitoring 10,000 10,000
2) Environmental Monitoring
Fund (with N/A 20,000 N/A 6,825.94
MMT)
3) Environmental Guarantee
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fund
TOTALS 10, 000 20,000 10, 000 6,825.94
*For mining projects, equivalent cost items shall be adopted, e.g. SDMP in lieu of SDP.

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Compliance Status
All the conditions set under the ECC of the proponent was complied and attained. There were no
exceedance of plant production and it is shown on table 1. All Effluent and emission was conformed through the
standards of DAO 2000-81. Before the registration of the company vehicle and delivery truck, emission testing
was done. According to the DENR Memorandum released last July 2008, that any diesel generator set rated at
301 kw to 599 kw should be tested once every other/second year that consists of three (3) sampling runs. The
Generator Set owned by the proponent was under the small source which should have a three sampling runs of
testing, this was done Last October 2009 in compliance to the permit for industrial facilities with air emissions.
ZPI Philippines, Inc. is certified to Integrated Management system, the programs set under the ISO
9001 and 14001, was align to the EMP under the conditions of the ECC. The program set under EMS
(Environmental management System) is continuously and properly monitored. There is Segregation of the solid
wastes, conservation and reduction of energy and water consumptions. On the Hazardous Waste management,
provision of locations and area are done, properly maintenance and posting of guidelines on how to avoid
human health and risk. Provision of proper PPE (personal protective equipment) and training under Hazardous
Waste Management was done under the training of PCO.

B. Environmental Management Plan Status


⇒ EMP of the proponent is consistent in complying with the Implementation set under the ECC
conditions. The stated mitigation/enhancement measures are scheduled. EMP is monitored and
maintained through the company wide programs for improvement and enhancement, such as:
 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT:
o Test sampling for the standby generator set. Records of data
gathered and monitored are secured; also the sampling results are well secured
for legal and future references.
 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT:
o Records of laboratory and sampling results are well secured for the
reference and basis for the monitoring.
 TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT:
o Storage for hazardous wastes is provided to avoid contamination to other
wastes such as residual and Compostable materials. Hazardous wastes are
monitored and maintained before final disposal (of any toxic/hazardous wastes
for treatment) to any treatment facilities that treated the hazardous wastes. It is
properly labeled according to its classification and segregated to other
untreated hazardous wastes.

5
ANNEX 3-1
PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual
Module 5 of SMR

o Accumulation of hazardous wastes is very minimal. A record from the previous


monitoring is well secured. Uniform manifest form of the TSD facility and the
waste generator is issued by the LGU for security purposes.

 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT:


o Solid wastes are segregated through the provided trash bins, and it is
integrated in the proponents Environmental Management System. It is
monitored by the disposal committee; Residual wastes are hauled and disposed
every month or by call as scheduled, and under PEZA accredited residual
haulers.

C. WORK PLAN FOR NEXT MONITORING PERIOD


Seeking for accredited Transporter, treater, storage and disposal facilitator for the Final disposal of the
hazardous wastes.

PREPARED BY: NOTED BY:

Engr. Robert E. Ulatan/PCO Mr. Katsuhiko Sasaki/President


Name/Position Name/Position

ZPI PHILIPPINES, Inc. ZPI PHILIPIPPINES, INC.


Proponent/Company Name Proponent/Company Name

July 14, 2010 July 14, 2010


Date Date

You might also like