Chapter 13 HW

13-5
a) P-value =0.00< =0.05 Reject H0. Cotton percentage
affects breaking strength.

One-way ANOVA:Stength versus Percentage

Source DF SS MS F P
Ex13-3Percentage 4 475.76 118.94 14.76 0.000
Error 20 161.20 8.06
Total 24 636.96

S = 2.839 R-Sq = 74.69% R-Sq(adj) = 69.63%

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev
Level N Mean StDev ------+---------+---------+---------+---
15 5 9.800 3.347 (-----*----)
20 5 15.400 3.130 (----*----)
25 5 17.600 2.074 (----*----)
30 5 21.600 2.608 (----*----)
35 5 10.800 2.864 (-----*----)
------+---------+---------+---------+---
10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

Pooled StDev = 2.839

 Boxplot of Strength

25

20
Strength

15

10

5
15 20 25 30 35

c) The normal probability the residual plots shows that the

assumptions are reasonable
 Versus Fits
response
10

5
Residual

-5

-10
13 14 15 16 17
Fitted Value

Normal Probability Plot

(response is Ex13-3Stength)
99

95

90

80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20

10

1
-7.5 -5.0 -2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0
Residual
 Residual Plots
Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits
99 10
90

Residual
Percent
50 0

10

1 -10
-10 0 10 14 15 16
Residual Fitted Value

Histogram Versus Order

10

5.0
Frequency

Residual
0
2.5

0.0 -10
-10 -5 0 5 10 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Residual Observation Order

13-15 Protein Contents

a) No the diet does not affect the protein content

 Boxplot of Protien content

4.5

4.0
Protein

3.5

3.0

2.5
B B+L L

b) ANOVA
Source DF SS MS F P
Ex13-13DietType 2 0.235 0.118 0.72 0.489
Error 76 12.364 0.163
Total 78 12.599

S = 0.4033 R-Sq = 1.87% R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%

Level N Mean StDev

Barley 25 3.8860 0.3796
Barley+lupins 27 3.8611 0.3784
Lupins 27 3.7600 0.4465

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled

StDev
Level +---------+---------+---------+---------
Barley (-------------*------------)
Barley+lupins (------------*------------)
Lupins (------------*------------)
 +---------+---------+---------+---------
3.60 3.72 3.84 3.96

Pooled StDev = 0.4033

c) The p-value= 0.489, the variability is due to random
error SSE= 0.146
d) Barley has the highest average protein and Lupins is
the lowest.

Individual Value Plot of B, B+L, L

4.5

4.0
Data

3.5

3.0

2.5
B B+L L
 Normal Probability Plot
(response is v)
99.9

99

95
90
80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20
10
5

0.1
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Residual

Versus Fits
(response is v)

0.5

0.0
Residual

-0.5

-1.0

3.750 3.775 3.800 3.825 3.850 3.875

Fitted Value

13-21
 There is a significant difference between 15 and 25, 15 and 30,
20 and 30, 25 and 30 25 and 35 and 30 and 35.

3-34
Low Pressure vapor deposition
From Minitab results we have;
One-way ANOVA: Uniformity versus WaterPosition

Source DF SS MS F P
Ex13-28WaterPosition 3 16.220 5.407 8.29 0.008
Error 8 5.217 0.652
Total 11 21.437

S = 0.8076 R-Sq = 75.66% R-Sq(adj) = 66.53%

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev
Level N Mean StDev --------+---------+---------+---------+-
1 3 4.3067 1.4636 (------*------)
2 3 1.7733 0.3853 (------*------)
3 3 1.9267 0.4366 (------*------)
4 3 1.3167 0.3570 (------*------)
--------+---------+---------+---------+-
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0

Pooled StDev = 0.8076

a) P-value= 0.008 < 005 reject the null hypothesis H0 and we

can conclude that strong difference in wafer positions at
=0.05
b) To estimate variance components using equations 13-24 &
13-25

Thus the estimate of variability due to treatment (wafer

position) = 2 = 1.5848
c) Random error components

Using equation
2 = MSE from ANOVA
2 = MSE= 0.652

d) From Minitab; the residual analysis indicates inadequacy

 Normal Probability Plot
(response is Uniformity)
99

95

90

80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20

10

1
-2 -1 0 1 2
Residual

Versus Fits
(response is U)

2.0

1.5

1.0
Residual

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Fitted Value
13-42.
Sampling distribution of difference of sample mean;

a) DF treatment = SS treatment / MS treatment = 193900/64600=3

Thus the number of levels of the factors that were used in
this experiment is equal to;
a-1=3 , a =4
b) The number of blocks that were used in this experiment is
equal to ;
b-1 = 3, b= 4

c) Completing the missing information;

DFE=DFT-DF blocks -DF treatment

DFE= 9

SSE=(MSE )(DFE )
4.464 *9 = 40.176

f = (MS treatment )/ (MSE)

64.600/4.464=14.47

Thus, the degree of freedom of numerator and denominator

are 2 and 9
Using the null hypothesis of equal treatment mean f anf F 2,9,
from F table f001,2,9=8.02 so P-value would be p<001

The complete ANOVA table;

Source DF SS MS f
Treatment 3 193.800 64.600 14.47
(factor)
Blocks 3 464.218 154.739
Error 9 40.176 4.464
Total 15 698.190
 d) Both at =0.05 and =0.01 there is a significant difference
in the treatment.

Exercise 13-47;

a) ANOVA results:

Two-way ANOVA: Shape versus NozzleType, Velocity

Source DF SS MS F P
Ex13-37NozzleType 4 0.102180 0.0255450 8.92 0.000
Ex13-37Velocity 5 0.062867 0.0125733 4.39 0.007
Error 20 0.057300 0.0028650
Total 29 0.222347

S = 0.05353 R-Sq = 74.23% R-Sq(adj) = 62.63%

p- value < 0.05 reject the null hypothesis so Nozzle type affect
shape measurement;
 Boxplot of Shape

1.1

1.0
shape

0.9

0.8

0.7
1 2 3 4 5

b) Fishers LSD;

There are significant difference between levels 1 and 3 ; 4; 2

and 4; 3 and 5; 4 and 5.
c) The residual analysis shows that there is some inequality of
variance. The normal probability plot is acceptable;

Versus Fits
(response is V)
0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10
Residual

0.05

0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.15
0.800 0.825 0.850 0.875 0.900 0.925
Fitted Value
 Versus Order
(response is V)
0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10
Residual

0.05

0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.15
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Observation Order
 Normal Probability Plot
(response is NT)
99

95

90

80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20

10

1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
Residual

Residual Plots for NT

Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits
99 10

90 5
Residual
Percent

50 0

-5
10
-10
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 10 15 20
Residual Fitted Value

Histogram Versus Order

6.0 10

4.5 5
Frequency

Residual

0
3.0

-5
1.5
-10
0.0
-10.0 -7.5 -5.0 -2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Residual Observation Order
`