Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brendon R. Foley
Mr. S. Bundy
Honors English 12
24 January 2017
One of the very popular television shows of this generation, Criminal Minds, explores the
actions of serial killers and what causes them to commit these crimes. It has been a highly
debated argument what exactly is the cause, whether it be a result of ones upbringings or an evil
that people are born with. In her novel, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley portrays through the
creatures life the idea that ones hatred of others can stem from abandonment and isolation in
Victor Frankensteins thirst for knowledge drives him to create a powerful, humanlike
creature from lifeless corpses. When this creature was born, he was so disgustingly hideous that
Frankenstein ran away without looking back. This left the creature, who was unaware of
anything, stranded on its own having to learn how to survive in an unknown territory.
Now, as the creature explored the world a bit, it came into contact with other humans.
The humans, acting as anyone who encounters a giant beast naturally would, either screamed and
ran away or prepared to attack the creature. This had a horrible effect on the creatures mind that
just wanted a sense of belonging. Ultimately, it lead the creature to hating mankind and
murdering multiple people. The question is, did this hatred come from an evil within the creature
Shelley hints at the latter, that the creature being alone and miserable turned him into a
Remember that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the
fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Everywhere I see bliss,
from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good; misery
made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous. (Shelley 87)
The creature clearly states here that the only reason for it being this way is because it is in
isolation from mankind, and it cannot have any sort of interaction with other humans. It has been
shown even in real life that this factor does play a significant role in ones future hatred of others.
If you take a look at some of the famous serial killers in history, this factor pops up as one
of the possible reasons why they committed their crimes. The other factor that experts are
considering is predetermined genes that make up the chemical balance of our brain, body,
thoughts, ideas, and most importantly actions (American Academy). It is a highly debated
argument over which factor actually has a greater effect on serial killers actions.
One of the most famous of all serial killers is Jeffrey Dahmer. In his lifespan, he took the
lives of over twelve men that he would meet and bring back to his place. A look back at his
childhood hints at the monster that he would inevitably become. He felt left out with the other
kids in school who thought he was really strange. At the age of eighteen, his parents got
divorced. His mother got custody of his younger brother and moved away. Jeffrey was left alone;
his father was nowhere to be found. He was abandoned and left alone in the house with nothing
but his increasingly deranged fantasies (Twisted Minds). This, much like the creatures situation,
arguably drove him to the level of insanity that he reached as an adult. He is not alone either. In
a study of fifty convicted serial killers, fifty percent of them suffered from psychological abuse
as a child under the age of eighteen (Guy). This shows the devastating effect that abandonment
The other side of this debate also makes a compelling argument. Supporters of this view
often point to the case of David Berkowitz. Unlike Dahmer or the creature in Frankenstein,
Berkowitz was raised by his adoptive parents in a loving manner. He was well supported and
known to be very polite (Salvatore). However, he grew up to be a deranged serial killer. So how
did this come about without any evident childhood trauma? The only answer, experts say, is
somewhere in the genetic makeup of Berkowitz. There have been studies done on the brains of
people who are prone to violence. These studies did come up with some evidence that supports
this argument:
Back in 2000 a report that was published in Science by Dr. Richard Davidson at
the University of Wisconsin at Madison compared brain scans of more than five
hundred people between those who were prone to violence and those who were
considered to be normal. The study found that the brain images of those who had
distinct brain activity compared to those who were considered normal. If this
study is correct then these murderers must have been born with an entirely
different genetic makeup than that of those in the majority of the population who
While there may be evidence like this to support this case, the magnitude of the effect does not
Getting back to the case of the creature in the novel, it can be debated which side directly
caused the creature to become a murderer. The most obvious argument to be made in support of
nature is in the way the creature was created. It was constructed from an abundance of random
human remains dug up from cemeteries. It is really easy to see how there could be some evil
Foley 4
within the creature from the second it first opened its eyes. However, there is no clear evidence
anywhere in the book that suggests the creature committed the murders because it was wired to
do so.
So that only leaves the concept of nurture and the circumstances of the creatures
upbringings. At the creatures birth, it was left alone, being abandoned by Frankenstein. Much
like Dahmer, the creature was isolated from any human contact for most of its childhood. It all
relates to Maslows hierarchy of needs. Everyone needs to feel loved. Everyone needs to feel that
they belong somewhere. Without these things, a persons mind can be severely damaged, as seen
There are many situations that easily could have destroyed the possibility of the creature
becoming a monster. Most simply, Frankenstein could have done his duty to the creature by
looking after it and teaching it the ways of humans. Then he could have shown others the
creature he created and told them that it was friendly just like them. The creature might have
been accepted by everyone else if someone explained to them that it was not a dangerous
monster and it would not hurt anyone. Frankenstein could have even been revered by the
scientific community for his creation. But none of that was possible after he abandoned his
creature at birth.
The family that the creature observed for awhile also had the potential to fulfill the
creatures needs. The old man actually understood the creature and wanted to help it because he
could not see the wretchedness of the creatures appearance and only knew it for its kind
personality. If the other people in the family just took one second to listen to the creature or their
father, then they too could have realized the creature just wanted to belong somewhere. Plus,
Foley 5
they could have learned that the creature had been helping them out for many months prior to
that. But since they acted on instinct and attacked the creature, none of that was possible either.
A lot can be learned from the themes in this novel with one of the most important being
the fact that abandonment and isolation can have a terrible and destructive effect on ones mind.
People look at all these serial killers and wonder how any human could ever do such a thing to
another person, and they never think to consider the things that this person has probably gone
through in their lives. Some of these people have lived through unimaginable pain and suffering
that definitely takes its toll on their brains. The worst part of it all is that there are kids in the
world right now going through these things, and without someones love and care, they could
Works Cited
American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress. The American Academy of Experts in
Guy, Fiona. Crime Traveller. Crime Traveller, www.crimetraveller.org/. Accessed 11 Feb. 2017.
ugtimes.com/2015/04/science/the-creation-of-a-serial-killer-nature-vs-nurture/. Accessed
11 Feb. 2017.